20070329145754.pdfo� ED,�o City of Edmonds
�d
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
�St. ago (425) 771-0220
DATE: March 29, 2007
TO: Michael Painter
PO BOX 3203
Lynnwood, WA 98046
FROM: Jenny Readwin, Plans Ex ine
RE: Plan Check # 2006-1302
Project: Emerson SFR
Project Address: 7211 Meadowdale Beach Rd.
During re -review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit two (2) sets of revised
plans/documents (affected sheets only) with a written response to each of the above items to a
Permit Coordinator.
1) 3/29/07 Still need all setbacks to property lines dimensioned. Some information is missing
from the site plan (i.e. covered porch, pergola, structure setbacks to property lines, height
calculation box -including covered porch, any easements, etc.). See enclosed sample plot plan for
minimum submittal requirements.
2) 3/29/07 Still Need. Provide reduced plot plan scaled 1 "=20' on legal size paper or smaller, that
matches the large site plan for microfilming purposes.
3) 3/29/07 Response said they were not needed but rockeries are shown on sheet 2 of the
site%ivil plans. Please show top and bottom wall elevations at 2' intervals and per our
handout because they are located in a critical area details stamped and signed by a
Washington State Licensed Professional Engineer are required with corresponding design
calculations also stamped and signed. Peer review may be required. rt appears that rockeries or
retaining walls will be needed on the site. Show location of any proposed rockeries or retaining
walls on the site plan with top and bottom wall elevations (see enclosed handout).
4) ok
5) ok
6) ok
7) 3/29/07 Still need. Provide letter from Geotechnical Engineer of record stating that they've
reviewed the final construction plans and they are consistent with their report recommendations.
8) ok
9) 3/29/07 Still need. See attached structural comments from city consultant. Respond to each item
in writing.
............ _........................ . ..
Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, PS
PO Box 523
Olalla, WA 98859
hoAeter@centurytel.net
253 857-4151
Fax 263 857-5759
To: 'Edwin Baler
123 4th Ave. N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Emerson Residence
7211 Meadowdale Beach Road
Edmonds
PIan Review # 05-446
Structure
Area S.F.
Lower floor
1560
Main floor
1588
Total
3148
Garage
576
Total
3742
av'd Patio
162
Porch
310
rand total
4196
EECE # EU 05-6I
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. 'The following comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written.response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
The scope of this review is for the Structural Only requirements of this project.
All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All
portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet ether departmental requirements,
conditions and concerns before permit approval.
Project Name: Emerson Residence Page 2 of 3
Plan Review # 05-446 EECE # 05-61
STRUCTS CC11DMEIVTS
General
1. EOR please clarify how the seismic factor was determined in the analysis. All it
states is use .143 times the weight then you increase it by 1.29%. How was this
determined? Please clarify on the response.
3. Geotechnical report states to use static fluid density of 60 PCF for long term
loading. Analysis used 42 PCF which is fine for the construction but please submit
analysis that when the structure is complete that it can resist the 60 PCF.
Sheet Al
4. Please provide detail on the drawing for the construction of the guards (guardrails).
They are required to resist a 200 pound horizontal force applied in any direction.
IBC 1647.7.1
Sheet A5
5. Please provide details on the framing of the 2"d floor deck. All that is stated is the
member sizes. Are knee braces required at the column? How are the lateral loads
being transferred at this location.? IBC 2304.9.7
6. EOR please clarify beam size call out at the deck. One beam is a 4X12 and the
other is 6X 12 with the same span. It appears based off the drawing and the
analysis the larger beam, is for the support of the spa. But how do you know the
spa will be placed on this side. The spa could be placed on either span. Also with
the different width beam, how are the members being connected at the center
column. Please either modify drawings accordingly.
i. Please provide details for the footing at the deck post. These are being placed on a
sloped surface.
Sheet S I
8. Detail D: Geotechnical report recommends the interior footing shall be placed a
minimum. of 12" below the finished grade. But this detail states 10". Please modify
accordingly.
Project Name: Emerson Residence Page 3 of 3
Plan Review # 05-446 EECE # 05-61
9. Detail D and C: The Geotechnical report states they recommend the strip fooling to
be a minimum of 18" wide but this detail states 16". Please submit letter from
Geotechnical engineer that as detail this is acceptable.
Sheet S2
10_ Shearwall table exceeds the capacity set forth in table 2306.4.1 _ Please submit .
analysis for Shearwall mark W6G and W40. Gypsum wall board on one side and
plywood on other does not equal the sum of both capacities. See IBC 2305.3.8.
Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and
additional information as requested.
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire
Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes,
clarifications or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building
Department plan review when comments are received from the other concerned
departments.
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at
(253) 857-4151 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
By:
Hoyt Jeter, P.E.
President