20070420080258.pdfo� EI) City of Edmonds
Q6PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
Fst. 1 g90 (425) 771-0220
DATE:
Apri120, 2007
TO:
Randal J Munson
randy.munson@comcast.net
FROM:
Jenny Readwin, Plans Exa ne
RE:
Plan Check # 2007-0164
Project: Classico Homes SFR
Project Address: 945 Glen St.
During re -review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit two (2) sets of revised
plans/documents (affected sheets only) with a written response to each of the items below to a
Permit Coordinator.
1) ok
2) ok
3) ok
4) ok
5) ok
6) ok
7) ok
8) ok
9) 4/20/07See attached additional comments. See attached structural comments from city
consultant. Respond to each item in writing.
Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, P.S.
PO Box 523
Olalla, WA 98359
hoytjeter@centurytel.net
360 874 0562
Fax 360 874 0591
To: Theresa Umbaugh
121 5th Avenue N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Classico Homes
945 Glen Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Plan Review # 2007-0164
Second Letter
Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2007
EECE # EDM 07-07 (2)
Structure
Stated Area
S.F.
First floor
2085
Second floor
1894
Total
3979
Garage
785
Total
4764
Porch
60
Covered Porch
88
gpper Floor Deck
12
Grand total
4924
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The fallowing comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
The scope of this review is for the Structural requirements of this project.
All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All
portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements,
conditions and concerns before permit approval.
Page 2 of 3
EECE#: EDM 07-07 (second letter)
Classico Homes
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS
General
1. 3. The drawings should clearly specify the requirement for the soil at the site.
Nothing is specified at this time. How were the foundations system determined for
this site with out this information provided? Please add this to the drawings.
R401.2 The response state to see sheet A-1.There is not any sheet Al in the set.
Please submit this on response.
Sheet A-6 FOUNDATION PLAN:
2. 4. EOR, please provide analysis for the foundations below the columns shown.
None was submitted in the analysis to justify the size sizes specified. Only one
footing was submitted on the response. There are other footings that required
analysis to be submitted not only the one location. For example the 27'X24"
footing.
3. AOR there appears to be no footing specified under the garage RWS wall. Please
add the required information at this location.
Sheet A-7 UPPER FLOOR/LOWER ROOF FRAMING PLAN:
4. 7. When different width beam frame into a wood column a detail is required to
show how the forces will be transferred. For example beam mark 7 and beam mark
8 have a width 5-114 and 7" respectively. Please add detail at this location to show
how the required forces will be transferred. More information is required then
just stating 6x6 wood columns. The revision to change the width is fine but still the
drawings do not specified the required connections of the wood post to the beams.
This information should be clearly added to the drawings for all post to beam
connections.
S. 16. EOR, there appears to not be a complete load path to the SW 2. Shearwall
number 1, as shown on sheet A8 at bedroom number 4, has no method to transfer
to the exterior shear wall (SW2) at the exterior wall located at the study. Submit
analysis and details to transfer this lateral force. The response states see response
from Reed and associates. There was not any response in the submitted packages.
Please submit this on response.
Sheet A-8 UPPER ROOF FRAMING PLAN:
6. 18. EOR, please sped the required collector element to transfer the shear force
to the interior wall at bedroom number 2. There is not method specified to transfer
this force at this location. The drawings still do not show in collector elements for
the interior shear walls. The response states see response from Reed and associates.
Page 3 of 3
EECE#: EDM 07-07 (second letter)
Classico Homes
There was not any response in the submitted packages. Please submit this on
response.
Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and
additional information as requested.
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire
Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes,
clarifications or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building
Department plan review when comments are received from the other concerned
departments.
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at
(360) 874-0562 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
By:
Hoyt Jeter, P.E.
President