Loading...
20071226112856.pdfCity of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION Est 1g90 (425) 771-0220 DATE: December 26, 2007 TO: LIU and Associates, Inc. J. S. Liu, P.E. 19213 Kenlake Place NE Kenmore, WA 98028 FROM: Jenny Readwin, Plans amine RE: Permit # 2007-0566 Project: Crabb Revision Project Address: 835 Maple Street During review of the above noted revision, it was found that the following information, corrections, or clarifications are needed. 1) See attached comments from City's Structural Consultant. Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, P.S. PO Box 523 Olalla, WA 98359 hoytjeter@centurytel.net 360 874 0562 Fax 360 874 0591 To: Theresa Umbaugh 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Crabb Residence Retaining wall 835 Maple Street Edmonds, WA 98020 Plan Review # 2007-0566 EECE # EDM 07-87 Plan review number 01 The above referenced project is in the process of plan.review for compliance with Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments, deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and subsequent issuance of permits. Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time. SCOPE OF REVIEW The scope of this review is for the Structural requirements of this project. All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements, conditions and concerns before permit approval. STRUCTURAL COMMENTS Sheet SW -1 1. The analysis submitted required the wall to be battered back 4 degrees but the drawings note vertical not battered. This is very important. This wall acts as a gravity wall with geogrid resisting the horizontal soil pressure. If the wall is not battered back then the wall will tend to also add to the horizontal pressure if the front settles just a small amount. Please modify accordingly. 2. The analysis submitted required the first block to be buried below grade 10.32 inches: The drawings only show 9" minimum which is not conservative. Please modify accordingly. Page 2 of 2 Plan Review Number 01 EECE#: EDM 07-87 Crabb Residence 2007-0566 3. It appears the geogrid is required for height exceeding 4' and not 7'. Please justify with analysis. IBC 1806 Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and additional information as requested. Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes, clarifications or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building Department plan review when ,comments are received from the other concerned departments. Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at (360) 874-0562 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. By: Hoyt Jeter, P.E. President