20080116132340.pdfof rn,�o City of Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
Fsr. ggo (425) 771.-0220
DATE: January 16, 2008
TO: Patricia Brennan Architects
pbarch@earthlink.net
FROM: Jenny Readwin, Plans Exall
cillerk
RE: Plan Check # 2007-1139
Project: Burt Addition/Remodel
Project Address: 7709 2015' Street SW
During re -review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit two (2) sets of revised
plans/documents (affected sheets only) with a written response to each of the items below to a
Permit Coordinator.
1) Please add the following information to the site plan.
■ 1/16/08 Note says north side point referenced at 100. Please clarify what this point is (i. e.
nail, spike, etc.). It must be very clear what the inspector is looking for on site. Datum
point must be a fixed point. if a utility pole is used there must be a clear reference point (i.e.
nail or spike).
You may redline plans or resubmit three (3) new site plans scaled no smaller than 1"=20' and
one on paper no larger than 8 1/z" x 14".
2) 1/16/08 Air Admittance valves are only permitted under and alternate design request
submitted with letter providing documentation on. why it is not at all possible to vent the sink
conventionally. There is also a $180 fee and it is not a guaranteed approval. Revise plans to
note a loop vent or submit a formal alternate design request. Show how island sink will be
vented through the roof or with a loop vent as permitted by UPC 909.0.Air admittance valves
are not permitted unless first approved by the Building Official under and alternate method per
UPC 301.2.
3) 1/16/08 See additional items below. See attached structural comments from city consultant.
Respond to each item in writing.
1) ok
2) Still Need. Calculations are required to check the design.
BOR it is not clear how the beam loads, reactions, moments, were det wed
bayed off the mialysis submitted. All that is noted is the, results. Please, Gly how
the loads were deterimin d in the analysis.
3) Ok
4) Ok
5) It is not clear by the calculations that this was intended to be a cantilevered beam. Please
provide complete calculations to justify.
EOR, it is not clear on the drawing what is supporting the 3-1/2XI MA PSI,
ridge beam. Ple se modify accordingly.
6) Still need. A specific connector is required to be called out here.
EOR Please specify the required connections of the 5 - 114X 116 PSS, to the
supporting studs.
7) Ok
8) Still need dimension noted on plans.
Detail EOR, pleaw ape ffy the nuvdmurn notch to be used for tie roafjoist.
This is very iruportant for the shear at this t ation. NDS 3. .2
9) Ok
10) Ok
11) Ok
12) Ok
13) ok
14) Smoke detectors are required in each existing sleeping room and in the hallway outside
each separate sleeping area. One is not required in the kitchen area as shown on the
plans.
. AOR; please show locations of the smoke alarms on the drawings. R313.2.1
15) Ok
16) Ok
17) Ok
18)100 cfin minimum is required for the stove. Please revise note.
AOR please speei t the required fan to be used aor the kitehen. It is not elect: ifs
is existing and a f i is already provided or new one is required. Please, add the
rewired fmi or show locations of the oxitirrg fa.. WSV&IAQC 302.2.1
19) Ok
20) Ok
21) ok
Page 2 of 2