2008-0750 Murillo Eagle Eye.pdf
Eagle Eye Consulting Engineers, P.S.
PO Box 523
Olalla, WA 98359
hoytjeter@centurytel.net
360 874 0562
Fax 360 874 0591
To: Marie Harrison
th
121 5 Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: Murillo Addition
th
23406 97 Place W
Edmonds, WA 98020
Plan Review #2008-0750 EECE #EDM 08-85 (2)
Plan review number 02
Structure Area S.F.
Lower floor 2781
Second floor 1154
Total 3935
Garage 319
Total4254
New Deck 84
Patio 66
Grand total 4404
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds
ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back-check time.
SCOPE OF REVIEW
Structural, Ordinance, V&IAQC, Energy
The scope of this review is for therequirements
of this project.
All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All
portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements,
conditions and concerns before permit approval.
Page 2 of 4
Plan Review Number 02
EECE#: EDM 08-85
Murillo Addition
2008-0750
STRUCTURAL COMMENTS
General
1.4. Please specify the required diaphragm nailing on the drawings.. Table IRC
503.2.1.1(1). The response states See new sheet 5A. This sheet does not have the
diaphragm nailing requirements specified. The table is for vertical loads and not
diaphragm requirements. Please modify accordingly.
Sheet 3 Purposed (lower) Floor Plan
2.5. Please add a detail at the bedroom 6 and the existing garage above. Based off
the drawings the support of the existing garage will be compromised with this
remodel. Please clarify on the drawings. The response states to furr out the wall for
the new additions, but the slab will not support the forces. Please modify
accordingly.
3.Please specify the required header size and the required support at the windows
noted on this sheet.
Sheet 5 Foundation Plan/Deck Framing
4. 8. Based off a span off trusses of approximately 35 feet the allowable soil bearing
pressure will be exceeded. Please submit analysis either to justify the footing size
or modify accordingly. The response states made the footing 16 wide X 8 but
this will not support the vertical forces due to the door openings. Please modify
the drawing accordingly.
Sheet 6 Roof Framing Plan
5.10. Please specify the required over framing attachments on the drawings. This has
not been specified on the drawings. Please add this to the drawings.
6.12. Please specify the required connection for the 6x10 beams on the drawings. A
positive connection is required to be specified. The only place the connection is
specified is at the post but not at the main house. How is the new 6x10 going to be
supported at these locations? Please modify the drawings to show how the vertical
loads are going to be transferred.
7.13. The drawings do not show any information for the attachment of the new
diaphragm to the existing wall locations. Please add a detail at this location to
show the lateral load path on the drawings. The response states See detail cross
sections on sheet 5A. The diaphragm is a horizontal or sloped system acting to
Page 3 of 4
Plan Review Number 02
EECE#: EDM 08-85
Murillo Addition
2008-0750
transmit lateral forces to the vertical resisting elements. This still is not specified
on the drawings. Nothing is specified to transfer the diaphragm lateral forces.
ORDINANCE COMMENTS
General
1.1. Please add the dimension for the construction of this structure. It is fine to put
field verify on the drawings but with the dimension specified there is know way to
determine the actual size of the structures. I have scaled some of the missing
dimension but this information should be provided when resubmitting. Please
specify how far the kitchen area extends past the exiting garage wall. The drawings
show a jog out without any dimension specified.
2.4. The drawings note the total area on the site is 3179 ft^2 but based off the written
dimensions and a few places scaled this gross area will be exceeded. Please add all
pertinent written dimensions and modify the drawings accordingly to not exceed
the 3200 ft^2. This still cannot be verified since the jog out is not specified at the
kitchen.
Sheet 3 New Floor Plan
3.10. Please specify the required fire-resistant filling around all penetrations at walls
between the house and the garage. With the new wall being added it is not clear if
there will be any penetrations new penetration into the structure. R309.1.2. This
still is not noted on the drawings. Please add this to the drawings.
4.11. All exterior doors shall have a minimum landing specified on the drawings
including the height of the threshold. R311.4.3 The response states 36 minimum,
but this is not noted for the doors off each of the bedrooms to the exterior. Please
modify accordingly.
Sheet 6 Roof Framing Plan
5.17. Please clarify on the drawing the required roof ventilations. I was unable to
determine this from the drawings. R806. The response states bird block from the
truss company. Please submit this to enable complete review of proper roof
ventilations.
Sheet 7 Cross Section
6.19. The building code requires roofs built with combustible material and with a
vertical height of 30 or more to have an attic access. Please note on the drawing
the vertical clearance and note the required attic access if required. (Without
Page 4 of 4
Plan Review Number 02
EECE#: EDM 08-85
Murillo Addition
2008-0750
knowing the slope of the truss bottom chord and size there is know way to
determine if the 30 will be exceeded. R807.1. The response states that the access
is off the enclosed deck. Please provide details at this area to show how this is
being built. It is not clear based on the submitted drawings.
VENTILATION AND INDOOR AIR QUALITY COMMENTS
General
7.20. Please specify the location and the required CFM for the whole house fan for
this structure. Since the remodel area exceeds 500 ft the structures shall meet the
whole house state ventilation requirements. WSV&IAQC 101.3.1.1. The required
CFM shall be specified on the drawing for the structures. The response states per
HVAC contractor. If this is to be specified as a deferred submittal, this should be
listed on the drawings. Nevertheless, the minimum required per the Washington
state ventilations codes should be specified on the drawings. Please modify
accordingly.
ENERGY COMMENTS
Prescriptive method used
Additional corrections may be required following receipt of corrections and
additional information as requested.
Your plans are being reviewed concurrently with the Building Department, Fire
Department, Zoning Department and Public Works Engineering. Changes,
clarifications or additional corrections may be required subsequent to the Building
Department plan review when comments are received from the other concerned
departments.
Should you have any inquiries regarding this letter, please contact Hoyt Jeter at
(360) 874-0562 between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
By:
Hoyt Jeter, P.E.
President