20091203140013556.pdfLawler, Patrick
To: michad@naahjoneeandarnon.com
Subject: NodhcraatCondos BLD2O0O003O
See attached city consulting engineer's comments.
2009120311015557
9.pdf (6 MB)
Pat Lawler
Plans Examiner
OV EDAI 0 City of . Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
f
BUILDING DIVISION
est sao (425) 771-0220
DATE: 12/2/09
TO: Nash, Jones, Anderson
Attn: Mike Johnson
11644 801h St
Kirkland, WA 98023
RE: Plan Check: BLD20080938
Project: Condominiums
Project Address: 620 Glenn St
During the review of the resubmitted plans for the above noted project, it was found that the
following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to
where the changes can be found on the plans, and submit revised plans/documents to a Permit
Coordinator. The comment numbers are based on the original and subsequent comments and
responses.
1. The city's consulting engineer's comments are included on the following pages. It might be
prudent to get the roof height and design issue resolved with planning, prior to resubmitting
revised calculations for the engineering side of the equation.
Pat Lawler
patrick.lawler@ci.edmonds.wa.us
Plans Examiner
425 771 0220 x1703
PO Box 523
S I',,
Olalla, WA 98359
561
hoytjeter@centurytel. net
2720
360 874 0562
2720_
Fax 360 874 0591
6001.._._._._
To: Theresa Umbaugh
City of Edmonds Building Dept.
121 5th Ave N
Edmonds, WA 98020
Re: North Crest 4 -Unit Condo
620 Glen Street
Edmonds, WA 98020
Plan Review # 2008-0938 EECE # EDM 08-90 (3)
i Ian review number 0
- ;
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time.
[I'lease note that this sh,yci.'ty,ejv.as not add to be d yi-ne"Ii°ILe ���ar "_an,(I taimmenty ivill
ret Sa� -�a,.dv_...h sty._e.�anaendiien as d"it��tww�h,Styi2o�M 1)fi
n411 .... be " mte a A a i ad dr �a i fed � erre llyP rt ii s eine.
._ _........._ .. - .. ..-�_
The scope of this review is for the Structural requirements of this project.
S I',,
Lower Floor
561
Main floor
2720
Second floor
2720_
'Total —
6001.._._._._
Garage2131
Total - _...._
813;
Balcony
240
Grand Natal --
5372
The above referenced project is in the process of plan review for compliance with
Edmonds ordinances and applicable codes. The following comments,
deficiencies/corrections must be addressed prior to completion of plans review and
subsequent issuance of permits.
Provide revised plans and calculations along with a written response to each of the items
listed below to facilitate a shorter back -check time.
[I'lease note that this sh,yci.'ty,ejv.as not add to be d yi-ne"Ii°ILe ���ar "_an,(I taimmenty ivill
ret Sa� -�a,.dv_...h sty._e.�anaendiien as d"it��tww�h,Styi2o�M 1)fi
n411 .... be " mte a A a i ad dr �a i fed � erre llyP rt ii s eine.
._ _........._ .. - .. ..-�_
The scope of this review is for the Structural requirements of this project.
Page 2 of 6
Plan Revicm 114umber 03
EECE#: EDM 08-90 (3)
North Crest 4 -Unit Condo
Project Review # 2008-0938
All features were checked only to the extent allowed by the submittals provided. All
portions of this project are assumed to meet or will meet other departmental requirements,
conditions and concerns before permit approval.
General
1. The� ri(.,,.w analy!.,is used an exterior deed load of the wAl not accoutrOng Or the
lyric k vooncer dead valght. Plase elar1Q, why 10 1& was used Ar the Kul load of
the wall on this level,.
2. 3. 8. Please add to the drawing the required earthquake design data per IBC
1603.1.5 item 6 (Basic seismicforce-resisting system (s)). 'I'lie drawl state broice
frarne as the seisrsde re&dng f0wee sysenn but Ods N riot Me caw. See ASCE Wide
12.2.1 or the different Kasic and rnodify the
dramrings nwcordM& The drawing sfaleslhai the asic n.';isting
sysWni is plywood shear walls. See i%SU dclinition (A'"WAvic Force'-ItudOn
Systemd'and tXSCE We 122-1 [or the, col-re'ct type orsy'steryl' 1-11ease 1-nodify
acconingly,
3. 4 9. Please add to the drawing the required earthquake design data per IBC
1603.1.5 item 7 (Design base shear). Please provide analysis how the 11baase shear oi'
2T72 vaos doemOwd as shown on sfic.,,e( LI. ThU K'ASC SIMIT Sl'ofll bC' C,11CL1haLed
NOV the correct dead load, 111case niodify accordingly,
4. 5 v 10. Please add to the drawing the required earthquake design data per IBC
1603.1.5 item 8 (Seismic response coefficient(s), U
Cs). The drawings do not. reflect
the conset Cs value. Pic -ase nwd§ acaulngly. TWs has nm been kemcd
5. 6, 18. Please add to the drawing the required applicable internal pressure
coefficient used for the wind design IBC 1603.1.4 item 4. The dn�,�wing state the
interna] presm.ire coefilicient to be I A. If dis is the case SUbMit,111,11YSiS Witll the
coeHicient. The coetheWrl is Qi R)r poir rethrence. Ws has not been addremed;
see ASC'E seclion 6.53 Or dendthn of internal prennse coctlident.
6. T 19. Please add to the drawing the required earthquake analysis procedure used
per IBC 1603.1.5 item IO.'I'h(,, drawings state, bnwed ifamc, but dis is not the case
11ease rnodify accordingly. The drawing statcs plyw'ood shear mall as thearra lysis
Procedure used. This is not an earthquake, analysis procedure aro, defined I')y tile
(;,ode. 1111ea,.ise rnodUl the thaWngs acarrAnWy. Also, please note this sfruc.ture does
not lhll uruler the lRC and must meet die IBC,