Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
20101130134857380.pdf
City of Edmonds Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet cFI�Lt Name of Proposed Project: Owner/Applicant Name Street/Mailing Address City State Zip Telephone: ApplinContact ers_ A Name �aQX 3S Strect/Mailing Address W_ n; City State Zip Telephone:?d r'�- 3 A16 — Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable): Firm Name Telephone: THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS Contact Nasne E-mail: Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete I. less than 25 peals -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist) Il, More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Location - Street address: C to - --Ib r 1 `moi a vicinity Wrap and site plan.) b_ Specify existing land use: c. Specify proposed type and size of development: �360 . (# of residential units and/or square footage of building) Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 1 of 5 d. Date construction will begin and be completed: e. Define proposed access locations: f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: I 2. TRIP GENERATION Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used. ADT = Average Daily Traffic PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak inay also apply as directed by the City Engineer) a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table: Land Use Daily (ADT) PM Peak -Hour Trips IN OUT c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table: PM Peak -Hour Trips Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips: Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5 3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For developments that generate over 75 pear -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.' 4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements? b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis: Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edrnonds Traffic Engineer Existing Conditions LOS 95% Delays Year of Opening LOS Delays Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use LOS Delays c. Describe channelization warrants: (Attach striping plan.) d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths): e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): [ Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Trak IrnpactAnatysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 50% 95% Existing Conditions Year of Opening Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants): f Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials): [ Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department 2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Trak IrnpactAnatysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5 5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.' a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project. b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the project is fully open (with and without project traffic). c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic). d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source: 6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation. Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the LOS calculations, b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: 1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 4124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 LOS LOS Existing Conditions Existing Delays Year of Opening With Project Without Project Five Years Beyond Change of Land Use With Project Without Project b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications: 1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records Revised on 4124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5 7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic impact fee shall be calculated from the. Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached) and as identified in ECDC 18,,82,.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations in ECIC; 18,82.130. D CHANGE IN USE Fee -for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was pen-nitted. If the previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04), the 2004 ECIC 1$.82.120 impact Ice shall be used. Units �ij Y11 ITE Land Use Category I Per Unit squarc&et Fee Rate 4 of divellinfzn of etc. New Use 11�, x JPC ha'4 -o o% x rior Use vv,� � $ New Use Fee: S - [Prior :ttJ:-se- Fee: �$ ZEI D NEW DEVELOPME NT New Use Units in ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet Fee Rate # of dwelling, Vfm etc. $ 1 x INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 (+ consultant fee) TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE City of Edmonds, om Imt 'No impact" fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative, ReWsed on 6124110 E82 - Traffic In ?pad Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5 2 -009, -.Impact FeeRaie TAW', CcYm ands Strae is and Roods fn7perct fee (tate Study TABLE 4 IMPACT" FEE [RATES 413 (23 (3) (4) (5) (6} Trip ITE. Und Use Trip 9o- Deur Length No Now -Trips per hpact 1= Per Unit @ a Gal g a Rate2 Trips-' Factor" Unit of Meawre *1 049.&1 per Tri 0 Light ]"usirial [210 0,97 100% 1,47 1,43 1.000 sq ft 1.50 per squiere Foot 0 Manufacturing 0.73 100% 1.47 1.07 1,000 sg ft 1.12 per square Not 1 Mini-vrare114u&e Q,a6 100 1.47 0.38 1,000 5 f4 0.4i} er S uare foot Single family House 1.01 100% 1.13 1.14 dwelling 1.196.33 per dwelling unit 0 Apartment 0P 62 100% 1.20 0.7 4 dwelling 776.56 per dwelling omit 0 Condominium 0.52 100% 1.15 0.60 idwellinc 629.65 er dwelling unit 240 Mobile Home 049 140% 1.09 0.54 dwelling 671.£2 per dwelling unit Z51 Senior Housing 0 -Ir? IO(r6 0.93 0.15 dwelling 157.41 per dwelling unit 320 Motel 0.47 100% 1.27 4,60 roam 629.65 perroom 420 Mariana 0.19 100% 0.97 0,18 bards 188.89 per boat berth 444 Movie Theater $40 85% 11.73 236 1,000 sq ft 2,48 pr:rssluaro toot 492 H widi/Fitnes Clefs 3.53 75% 1.00 2.65 1,000 sq ft 2.78 per 5 ultra foot S-34 High school 0.97 80% 1.00 0.78 1,000 sq f1 OZ2 per square forst 960 Church 0.55 100% 120 046 1,00D sq rt 11,69 per Square at ,anter ...-. 12.46 75%1 0.67 6.26 1.000 ug ft 6,57 P.Y s pare foot .G20 mursing "We 1,44W- 0.22 100x6 0.87 0.19 bets 199.39 per bed , Getteral Ofiien "71 Q. 1 1.49 90% 1.37 1.97 1,000 sq €k 2.07 par square tont n6- ` N€W.61 Owe 3.46 75OA 1.40 3.63 1,000 r_ ft 3.311 per square foot Spec4ait} Retail" " " 2.71 55% 0.64 0,89 1,000 sot it 0.93 per square foot 020 Shopping Center 3.73 6596 0,53 1,28 1,000 5q €t 1,34 per square front 850 Supermarket 10.50 65% 0,67 1 +4.57 11,000 jg it 4.80 pers uara foot 852 Convoini©nev mkt 34.57 44}96 QAO 5.53 1,0CQ sq ft SZO per square foot 15-16 hours 91 � Drive-in hunk 25.52 $5% 0.47 6,67 1:,000 sq ft 7.90 par square Pant 93Z Restaurant: sit 11.15 55% 0,73 4.48 1,000 5q ft 470 per square fboL down 933 fast fond, no 26.15 50% 0167 13161,000 sq ft 9.19 per square fent drive-Ull. 934 Faax toad, wJ 33,84 51% 01.62 1630 1,000 sot ft 11.23 ger square fart drive -up 936 coalaefDonui 40.75 20% 01.67 S.46 i,000 sq ft 5.73 per square foot Shop, no drive -up 938 Coffee/Donut 75.00 20% 0.67 10.05 i,4f10 sq rt 10.55 par scivarc foot Shop, driue-up, no indoor seating 945 Gas station 13.33 4595 0.53 3.19 vfp 3,347.8.2 per vfp5 wlevnvenielice 2 Ilt Trip generation (filth Edition): 4-6 PM Peak Hour Trip Ends I Excludes pass -lay PIPS: see "Trip Generollon Honrlbaok; An 17E PiQposed Reconri vended Practice" (I 98B) ^ Ratio to avorsago trip length, 'vFp. vehicle fuWng position i-ionciorson, CGJtV40fEciMand% Washingiorr Young & bctoiael 29, 20W Connpany. EFFECTIVE 5/1/2010 Page 21 .Revised on 6124114 E82 - Trak Impact Analysis Page 3 of 2004 - Impact Fee hate Table {ifJ 6J 1t .F fJCIC (r r J ?CrC �'{7C RC9i @ S� lt[iy 11PTrip (Denercaiinn (6th Ethilon): 4-6 PNS Peak 1'1777!1 TTiia Ends Excludes pass -by -hlpx: see `51p GW)er€atimi Hondba ok; An IFE Proposed Recornm ndea<I Pmctle.a'(t9R8) a Ratio to avorclgo trip lenfiih, VIP, vehlclo fuotng P031110P. Hend'e.ison, 01y of Ef� m-,)ncia, Washington v©para EFFEC'T'IVE 9/12/2004 aE�Il1 paces 13 eflaTapar,y Revised on 6124110 E82 - Tragic ImpactAnatysls Page 4 of 4 TABLE 4 IMPJIG3 F:F.7; li_A_ TSS-.. 66- --(2) - --(3) (4) Trip iTE 111 Land 'Use Trip % New Longth Net Now Ts 1pa par Impact Fac per Unit P $ Curia cateugry Rate Tri 0 motor" 'Unit of Measure 7#3'3.66_.per Trion 1,110 Uff..ht Industrial 03:98 1 DO% 1.59 1.56 1!,000 Bh Ft 1.19 (:'er square foot 140 �1mufacturlaq 9.74 ° 1100 On 1.59 1.1 B 1,1700 tq ft 0.90 tmr square foot 'lot Kni"Warehouse 0.26 100% _1.59 0.41 1,000 q ft 0.32 per square foot Flu Single family 1,01 100% 1.09 1,10 dwellinq i40.i2 par d-W,e-lUracl t1niit House 2240 Apafurient 0.62 100% 1.15 0,71 dive7ling 544.49 per dveellln8 unit 230 Condonninium 0.541 t3O% 1.15 0.62 divelli-n 474.24 cr dweft unit Z.q( I~ir�f�lle hIome 0,56 a 1d10r36 1,09. 0.61 dwolili>Ifd 466.14 per dwelling unit 310 Fint-ml 0.01 100% 1.25 h.7G r0um 5112.2.9 pet' room 320 Notal 0.47 100% 1.Z5 0.89 ruoul 44Bl 65 at room 421) Marina 0.19 10495 0.97 0.111 berth 14.0.74 iter moat herth 430 Uf course 0.30 1001!o '1.00 0.39 acre 229.10 rer acre 44 Itnz4lea Theater 3.80 10f14 0.72 2.74 1,000 ocT it 1.3G ;q s_ uare fnat. 492 1tacquax cWh 1.89 1 D09i 0,97 1.78 1,000 nq it 3.58 ri!r squaws toot F5 30 High SC11001 1,02 104°70 0,682 0.63 1,000 bg it 0.48 par sgware, foot 560 Church 0.6i 100% 1,15 _ 0.76 1,000 Fq ft 0.98perces uare foot 610 Hospital 0.92 1 OD% I--P?6 = 1.44 1,00D sq ft 1,1.0 per Square foot GLQ N rrsing homct 0.2G 1404`u U.87 0-17 [ped 13UH per bed 710 6enerai Office 1.49 100% 1.59 2.37 1,000 sq 4t 1,41 Tier square foot 720 vesica) ortica 3.66 100% 1.503 5.49 1,000 sq It 4.19 pnr square foot 820 Shopping Center 3.74 -81% 0,40 1.21 1,{700 sq it 0.93 per square f*ot 8;32 Restaurnat: sit- 10.86 SC,% I 1.015 6.45 1,400 scl it I 4.92 per square foot 83:: Fast fond, no 26J i 5M t1.G? .1.43 1,000 sq it 6.44 per square foot drive -nap e34 fsst food, vr! 33,48 51% 0.62 10,59 1,0€70 sq ft 13.08 pa:r square foot tl ri,wv-lap B44 Gas statinri_ 14.:5G (i}) 0.53 4.F3.p_uirip 35.82 per of 045 6xs station 13.38 47`A 0.53 3.33 pump 2,545,26 per +rips ul/converaienen 350 Supa:rmarkrt 11,51 55% 0.&s 4,11 1,000-5q it 3A4per srquare foot 851 Conventerice 53.73 39% 0AU 8313 1,000 sq ft 6.40 per uquare fool rnarkot-24 hr 917. Drive-in Bank 59.77 51% 0,47 13.13 1,.000 sq ft 10,03 leer squara foot 11PTrip (Denercaiinn (6th Ethilon): 4-6 PNS Peak 1'1777!1 TTiia Ends Excludes pass -by -hlpx: see `51p GW)er€atimi Hondba ok; An IFE Proposed Recornm ndea<I Pmctle.a'(t9R8) a Ratio to avorclgo trip lenfiih, VIP, vehlclo fuotng P031110P. Hend'e.ison, 01y of Ef� m-,)ncia, Washington v©para EFFEC'T'IVE 9/12/2004 aE�Il1 paces 13 eflaTapar,y Revised on 6124110 E82 - Tragic ImpactAnatysls Page 4 of 4