Loading...
2012-0672 Goodmansen addition.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: August 30, 2012 TO: Randall Munson randy.munson@comcast.net FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner RE: Plan Check: 2012-0672 Project: Goodmansen addition th Project Address: 9704 216 Place SW During a review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the changes can be found on the plans, cloud all changes on the revised plans, and submit the revised plans/documents to a Permit Coordinator. Thank you. General Notes: 1.The Building Division review of the carport addition is of the structure as originally submitted. Additional review will be necessary for any changes made to the structure or its location on the lot in response to the requirements of other Divisions. 2.The Building Division does not require mechanical or plumbing plans to be submitted for single family residential construction. However, prior to construction when a significant addition or series of additions has been made to an existing structure, it is recommended that a discussion with the mechanical and plumbing contractor occur to evaluate the existing system’s capability of meeting the total demands made upon them. On page A-5: 1.Provide the required source specific exhaust fan for the bathing area of the ‘Master Bath’ per M1507. On page A-6: 2.Clarify the note ‘24” diameter x 48” deep footing’ near the proposed ‘Covered Patio’. It appears to refer to the proposed ‘Carport’ and ‘Covered Patio’ footings. If so, clarify the differences between the size noted and those represented in ‘Detail 7’ on page A-9 – see also review note # XX. 3.Indicate the required footing size to support the load at the east bearing end of ‘Beam 11’ – 5-1/4 x 11-7/8 PSL. On page A-7: 4.Indicate the beam required over the 60x68 ‘Store Doors’ in the north wall of the ‘Family Room’ to support the north end of ‘Beam 8’ – 5-1/4 x 11-7/8 PSL - and the point load of the girder truss above. 5.Indicate the beam required over the 30 window in the south wall of the ‘Utility Room’ to support the south end of ‘Beam 12’ – 5-1/4 x 11-7/8 PSL. 6.Clarify the difference between the shear walls represented and those noted in the structural calculations at the following locations: a.Wall line A – SW-1 shear wall at the north wall of the kitchen on the west side of the window at the sink. b.Wall line 2 – SW-1 shear walls at each side of the fireplace in the living room. c.Wall line 3 – SW-1 shear walls at the east wall of the ‘Family Room’, and on the east and west side walls of the stairway. 7.Provide callouts on the ‘Upper Floor/Lower Roof Framing Plan’ or references in the ‘Shear Wall Schedule’ to ‘Details 1 & 2’ where applicable to guide proper construction and inspection. 8.Provide a detail and references to it for the required shear transfer connections at the top and bottom of interior shear walls. On page A-8: 9.Detail 1 – Roof Diaphragm at SW – Add the required diaphragm boundary nailing at the bird-blocking to complete the shear transfer from the roof diaphragm to the shear wall below through the bird-blocking. 10.Provide callouts on the ‘Upper Roof Framing Plan’ or references in the ‘Shear Wall Schedule’ to ‘Details 1 & 2’ where applicable to guide proper construction and inspection. 11.Provide a detail and references to it for the required shear transfer connections at the top and bottom of interior shear walls. On page A-9: 12.Detail 7 - Post/Footing Detail - Clarify the differences between the dimension callout – 24” dia. x 72” deep concrete footing – and the dimension noted on the right side of the drawing to guide proper construction and inspection. On page A-12: 13.The footnote references in the WSEC Table 6-1 need to be corrected to guide proper application of the table information. 14.Clarify the references to “See figure(s)…” in the various sections after the WSEC Table 6-1. They appear to correspond to the WSEC Builder’s Field Guide but it is not referenced as a/the source and without it the ‘figure’ references may cause confusion. Page 2 of 2