Loading...
2013-0523 Mathew SFR.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: June 17, 2013 TO: Randall J. Munson randy.munson@comcast.net FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner RE: Plan Check: BLD2013-0523 Project: Mathew SFR Project Address: 636 Dayton Street During a review of the plans for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications or changes are needed. Please provide written responses as to where the changes can be found on the plans, cloud all changes on the revised plans, and submit the revised plans/documents to a Permit Coordinator. Thank you. On page A-3: 1.Building Section - Clarify the ‘stairs’ apparently leading from the garage to the storage area above. Aside from a framing detail on page A-7 that might be for a stairwell, no other representations could be found among the construction documents. The placement of the stairs could be a factor in determining the dwelling/garage separation or fire sprinkler requirements. On page A-7: 2.Clarify the callout for ‘Beam No. 3’ – 4x8 DF-L #2 – it appears to be over spanned. The point load from the beam supporting the girder truss above the stairwell does not appear to have been accounted for. 3.Indicate on the plans the required framing connector to support the load at the east end of ‘Beam No. 8’ – 3-1/2x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – where it connects to ‘Beam No. 6’ – 5-1/4x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – to guide proper installation and inspection. Both beams are ‘flush-framed’. 4.Indicate on the plans the required framing connector to support the 4306 pound load at the south end of ‘Beam No. 6’ – 5-1/4x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – where it connects to ‘Beam No. 7’ – 3-1/2x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – to guide proper installation and inspection. 5.Indicate on the plans the required framing connector to support the 3950 pound load at the north end of ‘Beam No. 1’ – 3-1/2x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – where it connects to ‘Beam No. 2’ – 3-1/2x11-7/8 2.0E PSL – to guide proper installation and inspection. 6.Indicate on the plans the required beam to support the floor loads and the point loads from the roof beams above over the 5.0x5.0 window in the east wall of the Kitchen. The ‘typical’ #2 HF 4x8 specified in the ‘Framing Notes’ appears to be over spanned. 7.Indicate on the plans the required beam to support the floor loads and the point loads from the roof framing above over the 6.0x5.0 window in the south wall of the ‘Study’. The ‘typical’ #2 HF 4x8 specified in the ‘Framing Notes’ appears to be over spanned. 8.Indicate on the plans the required 7-foot ‘SW-1’ braced wall panel at the north wall of the ‘Great Room’ – braced wall line ‘B’, level 1 – per the provided structural calculations. On page A-8: 9.Indicate on the plans the required beam to support the girder truss and other loads over the 6.0x3.6 window in the west wall of the ‘Hall’. The ‘typical’ #2 HF 4x8 specified in the ‘Framing Notes’ appears to be over spanned. 10.Provide a reference where applicable to detail ‘7/A-9’ for the required construction to complete the shear transfer from the roof diaphragm to the braced wall below. Structural Calculations: 11.Clarify the amount of wall bracing provided by braced wall line ‘B’ for level 2. One of the 16-foot and the 15.33-foot segments are the north and south lower level walls of the ‘Great Room’ and have windows in them, but are shown as braced walls for the upper level. Page 2 of 2