Loading...
20140516104202633.pdfNENNUM J, ()'14 Tff GALLI GROU Gcotechnicat Consulting City of Edmonds Building Division Subject: Response to Corrections Jacobson Retaining Wall 18140 84'h Ave W Plan Check 2014-0204 Attention: Leif Bjorback, Building Official Copies: Dennis Titus, Project Engineer dc'nnisl(q�c jnscmn "gengincer Geo/Soils April 30, 2014 TGG Project 1714-3 The following are responses to the correction notice from Leif 13jorback, dated April 2, 2014, regarding the project described above. The items in our response correspond to the numbered items in the correction notice. We have responded only to the items related to geotechnical issues. CG Engineering will respond to the plan review comments as the lead on the project. Item 3: Axial Loading on p-1 1, item 2 of Geotechnical Report. Axial loading refers to the capacity of the pile along its axis. We recommend 6 kips for 2 -inch piles and 12 kips for 3 -inch piles. If the pipe were to be battered, then the vertical capacity would be reduced accordingly since the capacity is along the axis of the pile. The piles are designed to resist the gravity load of the wall as well as some of the load applied by the vertical component of the anchors. Item 4: Helical Anchors The choice of the helical anchor is typically up to the installer while the capacity of the anchor is provided by the engineer. During installation The Galli Group will verify that the anchor achieves at least 200% of the design capacity of the anchor. The anchor recommended by the sh Lictural engineer (8 -inch helix, 3/8 -inch thick, I 1/2 -inch bar) will typically achieve an ultimate capacity of about 30,000 lbs in these granular soils. Thus the designated anchor seems appropriate for the design load of 12,000 lbs. Increased capacity can often be achieved if necessary by increasing the deptl-/length of installation or by increasing the diameter of the lead helix. It is incumbent upon the installer to achieve the recommended capacity under geotechnical supervision/verification. Response to Corrections (Geo/Soils) Edmonds Plan Check 2014 — 0204 18140 84" Ave W April 30, 2014 Page 2 Item 5: Statementfi-om Galli Group The Galli Group has reviewed the revised drawings for the project prepared by CG Engineering dated 03- 04-14, and revised 04-14-14 , with regard to geotechnical elements. The design conforms to the recommendations in our geotechnical report. Item 7: 2 -inch Pipe Piles Limited machine access has necessitated the use of 2 -inch piles rather than 3 -inch piles. We recommend using 2 -inch galvanized schedule 80 extra strong steel pipe piles driven to nominal refusal defined as less than I inch of penetration in 60 seconds of continuous driving under the weight of the operator and 90-1b jackhammer. The capacity for a 2 -inch pile driven to this specification may be considered equal or exceeding 12,000 lbs ultimate load or 6,000 lbs working load. The specification on the plans conforms to this recommendation. Hopefully this completes all actions requested. Sincerely, 00 01 6041GGp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IVO Paul L. Stoltenberg, P.E. Project Geotechnical Engineer r 1714 Response to Corrections GEO SOILS--JACOBSON—Plan 2014 0204.doc The Galli Group