20140625151634813.pdfi
i
I
iI
i
K R A N N I T }}? Z-- ( G H H L
A R C H I T E C T-_
T
;i
I
City of Edmonds
Public Works Department
Engineering Division
121 5t" Avenue North
Edmonds, WA 98020
Attention: JoAnne Zulauf
Regarding: BLD20140415 Plan Review Corrections
JoAnne,
June 24, 2014
Enclosed for your review and approval are revised plans and updated drainage
report for the above referenced project. The revisions address comments outlined in
your June 6, 2014 Plan review corrections notice, which are also included here for
reference. Each added note or new information has been clouded and has revision
symbol I placed by the cloud.
Plot Plan:
1. Please remove all existing conditions that will not remain after construction from
this plan.
As requested, the plotplan, sheet A0.1 has been updated to remove all existing
conditions that were noted as to -be removed or demolished This includes_ the_ existing _
home, driveway, and trees/shrubbery. Note that this includes the existing drain line
that runsdownthe slope toward the tracks -that -the -Geotech recommended be - -
abandoned.
2. The plot plan shall show the location of all the utilities (water, sewer, electric, etc.)
and stormwater system but does not need to include the details (length, size, etc.)
Utility locations and runs -have -been _added to the plot plan. -A --legend for utility lines
has been added. The storm water system primary components location has been
added.
765 N.E. Northlake Way
Seattle, Washington 98105
T:206.547.8233 F:206.547.8219
krannitzgehl.com
3. Add note to plan "All utilities will be installed underground".
The requested note has been added along with the utility legend.
4. Please note the location of the nearest fire hydrant on plan and note the distance
between the property line and the hydrant.
The nearest fire hydrant was already shown on the plot plan and was labeled
"nearest fire hydrant". We have added a dimension with the distance to the property
line.
5. Please revise impervious surfaces information. See comment #1 under Stormwater.
Per discussion between Donna Breske, Jerry Shuster and yourself and per attached
email dated, it is not necessary to revise the impervious surfaces information as it is
agreed that the exempt impervious area was correct, and can stay as calculated for
this case, since a stream discharge is not involved. Also see response letter prepared
by Donna Breske for Civil drawings.
I appreciate the opportunity to present the enclosed revisions. Should you have any questions
or require additional information please do not hesitate to call or email me at:
206 547 8233
bryan@krannitW--ehl. com
Sincerely,
Bryan Krannit4hi
Krannitz Gehl
Enclosures