20141028115447459.pdfC,J, t y of, f E(d III r U o l ff d s
r r"I a ffi C k'r"'ialysi s \/Yor"kslfieet
Name of Preposed Project:
Owner/Applicant Applicant ("."ontact Person:
(Z
....... .. .. ........
..... . ......... . ...... ................
lane
. . . .............. . . .....................
StreetflWaifing'�A_ c.dres's_____'
I e'9
City State Zip
Narne
...................
Street/Mailing Address
City State Zip
Telephone: . ......... .. . .
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic lmpactnalysis (if applicable):
Virtu Narne Contact Marne
Telephone-, E-mail:
U, IdIIINIffifflaaff=01
'rHRE, SHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Project Traffic Levels. e-OLTM, to, .. . .earn....
1. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated 1 and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
H. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location - Street address:
(Aflach a vichafty map and site plan.)
b. Specify existing land use: �?
Jr ......... ....... . ..................................... .
................
c, . . ...... .. ....... ............. . . . .......... . .............. . . ........
(fl qfresidendal unks, aipdlewsquarefi)ofage ofbiti''ilding)
Revi,vd on 612,1 lo &V - fraffii, hnpe',icl Arudj,wis fforkshcef Page I r?f 5
d. Date construction will begin and be completed:
e. Define proposed access locations:
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: 7q o E"Crr
�V C8411 W4 NO 041f.1 I E1191
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation. Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Trgf c Inzpac7 �1izalysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For
developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.'
4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer
Existing Conditions LOS Delays
Year of Opening LOS Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of LOS Delays
Land Use
c. Describe channelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths):
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials)-
' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on 6124110 F82 - TrQf c Iwpact Artalysrs Worksheet Page 3 of 5
S. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.'
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
LOS I I LOS
Existing I i Delays
With Project I I Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of With Project Without Project
Land Use
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
' A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public recon -ds
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Tra/tic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5
7. MITIGA"TION RECOMMENDATIONS
State rucornt-riended bpm eaSUres and (ces, required to rnuigatc proJect specific Iraffic irnpacts, Tral:fic
impact fee shall be calculated ftorn thc Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate StUdy Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.811 0, except as otberwise provided for iDdependent fee calculations
inEC'DC 1 11„612.1.30.
El CHANGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was pernii[ted, fftht
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of'Ordinance 35 16 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.81120 impact fee shall be used.
Units irl
11"'E I...a,nd Use Category I Per Unit square feet,
Fee
Fee Rate It of dwelling,
etc.
`3 x "'?”" �'
'P f
�"_f .... . .............
[ENe,wUse
Prior Use $A,
-1 ce,
[:New I..Jse Fee: $ rp Fee:
0 7ru-s!
A) -ri L,
NEW DEVELDPMENT
New Use
L OTHER
ITE Land Use Category Per Unit
I Fee Rate
0
KM
Units in
square feet,
of dwelling,
Vfr), etc.
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION.
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.0,0 (� consultant fee)
L......TOTAL TR -=FEE$
City ofEdmovids,Engineerie g Division Approval
1 No 6npad flies witl be du'c' nor wfll a Credit be given, fi,-)1, '-ul 41)paci I'ee in H, nct negalive,
/6" v1sed on x"1241;0 )"'82 T)qffic hyllpact "'Inallwis fflorkyhem Poge� ") of -5