20141211163225999.pdfDecember 10, 2014
City ofEdmonds
Development Services Department: Planning &Building
Attn.: Chuck Miller
1. The Architectural plan showed incorrect dimensions for the existing (and maintained) girder. We
went back to measure the existing, which is in fact a 412. Also the span will not change in the
proposed plan. The location of the 6x6 support column by the stairs has been modified to match
the structural sheet and tV maintain the existing beam span of 19'-3".
w Sheet A-3.The plan shows existing beam with correct size N«12\and existing span of
19'-3". Ren. I.
* Sheet A-5.The plan shows the support column atthe location mfthe previous wall ofthe
istorage area', matching the indication of the Structural Sheet S-3. The span remains at
19'-3". Rev. 1.
0 Sheet S-3.The span remains at1g-3'per Arch. Plan Sheet A -O5.
2. The plans now consistently represent the existing girder beams with their (re -measured)
l Structural Floor 1Plan:
a. Double Zx1Ojoist were added Uothe structural plans 0o pickupthe additional point load
imposed bvthe reactions atthe end ofthe header above. Rev. 3 -Sheet S-3.
b. Aminimum 4xAheader size was called out onplan. Rev. 4 -Sheet S-3
c. Please refer to calculation on V2 for justification of 6xio header over garage door
PietnoPoteotA
ALCOVAarchitecture company
1725 Westlake Ave N, suite 110
Seattle, NA981O
p. 206 660 6818