20150204130558005.pdf"Fraffic Ir�,ripact- k�,�,,�ialysis
U hNji I C,:,
Worksheet
NaRne of Piroposed
. .............. . ......
Owiaer/Applicant
Name
... ........... . . . ............................
Street/Mailing Address
City State Zip
Apphcaifl :on Peirson:
. ............................................... ........... - . . ................ ... .............................. . ......... .
Name
Street/l aiHng Address
. . ...........
City State Zip
-ione:
Telephone: Telel)]
.................... . . . . ------ ------ . . . ..... . ................. . .........
Traffic Engineer who pi-epared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if appliciable):
Firm "Name Contact Narne
Telephone: E-mail:
-------------------------
...............................
THRESHOLD L,EVELS OF ANAIMIS
-,P,Kqj.e.ct'TraI'fic Levels s to Complete
I. Less than 25 peak -hour tj.,-ips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
11, More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location - Street address: t
............. . . ........ ......... . ......... (A thich a vie -ire ity mop an d site plan.)
b.Specify existing land use: C
c. Specify
proposed t/
pc and size of developnent:
. . . . . . .......
e ol'buildhig)
Rewvvd Pcpj',c / e) 5
d, Date constn..rctioi ivill begin and be
e, Def lie propos('A acc'ess locatiorvi:
f. Defi iie proposed sight distance at site egress local iorrs:
2. TRIP GENERATION
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Insfluite of"T'ransportafioo Engineers (ffE) Trip Generation
nranual. For independent fee calcuiations, the currerit edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PIVI Peak-hoin- trips (AM, noou or sehool peak may also apply as directed by the City Bigiiieer)
a, Existing Site Trip Generation Table;
. .......... . . ............. . Grp
...... . .
PM Peak .-HourTrips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN AUT
............
. .................... . . . . . ... . ........................................ . . .... . ............... . . . . ... . .......................................................... ... . ........ . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ............
b. Proposed ProJect Trip, Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
. . . . . ......... - ......... . . - . ........................... . . ......... . . . . .......
c. Net New PrQject Trip Generation Table:
........ . . M
PPeak-Rom, Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
..........
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link. -diverted orpassby trips:
Revised on 6,24, 10 F82 - Jhqfic Page 2'al 5
3. 1111113 DIS" PRIBIJ11014
Prepare and attach a graphic Omwing, 1 -Wo -cerilages and ass�nrnerds, 1"01
ject trij�,� clisfribtj6on pei
(level opal en Ls that generate ovej '75 peak hour [rips, the City Engineer mserves the iiglit to requin"
trip distrilmAJon to be cJe[,ern-iined thi-OLIgh use of the 0ty traffic rnodel. �
,1SITEA(TESS ]ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been me! per AASHTO requirernents?
13. Intersection Level of
Intersect on, to be ev
Existing Conditions
ice (LOS) Analysis-,
!(Ishall be cletermined b) the 0v qflWnioncls Trqf , Egi cer
[10S
Delays
Year of Opening 'LOS, Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of 1,1S Delays
Land Use 0
. ... ...... ........
c. Describe channelization warrants:
— --------- -- — — -- - ------- -
(Attach stripinn plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate .50 and 95 %queuing lengths):
50J�
% i
95%
Existing Conditions I
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history'` (only required for access to principal and minor arterials)::
Aw-fflable upm reqi,icsi m City of Hinotids Drnlolopment Services Depadflvm�
Available ripcm rcqu,wst m Miry of'Fdmonds Poko
fla vispr) on hwf
,lic lmpewrzbvdlysi,s Wmbhee(
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.I
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
LOS I LOS
Existing Conditions I Existing I I Delays
Year of Opening With Project Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of With Project Without Project
Land Use
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Traffic c Impact Analvsis f l"orksheet Page 4 of 5
T M 1.1 1GA110 IN RECOi "11" lEN DA'FJONS
'Rate rmmm,riended ineasures and 1`76-,s required to miligate pro ect specific Iri,,iffic irnpacts. Fraffic
S 'i
Impact fee shall be cakUlated fi-on-i the Echnonds 1Wi.d Impact Fee Rate Study 'Fable 4 (attached)
and as identified in FO)( 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided Voi independent fiee calculations
in FCDC 18,82,130,
Cl-LAINGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the tin�ie the pl-iOl' LISe was permitted. Ifthe
previous ase was permitted prior to the adoption of Oj�dinancc 3516 ('effective date- 09/12/04),,
the 2004 ECDC 1 &81120 impact fee shall be used.
Units in
ITE Land 11:>c.Calegory Per Ulnit square 'feet.,
Fee Rate of dwelling,,
etc.
New Ilse X
Prior Use X
V�
blew Use Fee: [P :H o :1rL �Js
D NEW DEVELOPMENT
ITE Land Use Category Per Unit
I Fee Rate
9
D OTHER
Ii
Units in
square feet,
fi of dwelling,
vfbetc,
MIDGATION FEE RECOMMENDATIOIS:
INDE PEND FNTFEE CALEUL.A] I ]ON: $200M (± consultant fee'
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMTACT FIEF
City of Edmonds, Engineering Division Approval Date
' No impad 1'ea �vJfl bc, due, nor vvM a c',icAd [A', Jim an impml pw.a, G"'fleuIation vesuldng in a tio m""g,"flive,
Revis(?d ou 6/24/10 Wwksheei Poge 'J