2015-0881 Maston SFR - Nash Arch.pdf
City of Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
(425) 771-0220
DATE: September 21, 2015
TO: Maston Properties & Construction, LLC
rick@mastonproperties.com
FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner
RE: Plan Check: BLD2015-0881
Project: Maston SFR
th
Project Address: 22407 96 Avenue W
During a review of the plans by the Building Division for the above noted project, it was found that
the following information, clarifications, or changes are needed. A complete review cannot be
performed until the revised plans/documents, including a written response indicating where the
clouded or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted
to a Permit Coordinator. Reviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may
result in additional comments.
On the Residential Building Permit Application Form A:
1.Fuel Gas/Plumbing Fixture Count Clarify the difference in the proposed water heater to be
installed and that required per the selected Washington State Energy Code (WSEC) Table
R406.2, option 5b. A 36000 Btu tank-type water heater does not appear to have an energy
factor (EF) of .82.
On sheet A1:
2.2012 WSEC Notes Ventilation Change the code section references for the type of system
and the sizing of the fan to be used to provide whole house ventilation from M1508.3,
Table M1508.2, and Table M1508.3 to M1507.3.4, Table M1507.3.3(1), and Table
1507.3.3(2) per the 2012 IRC.
On sheet A3:
3.Foundation Plan - Provide a callout for Detail 3 on sheet G1 for the continuous
footings/foundations to guide proper review, construction, and inspection.
On sheet A6:
4.Upper Floor Plan
a.Indicate on the plans the required smoke alarm in the immediate vicinity of
Bedroom Two and Bedroom Three per R314.
b.Indicate on the plans the required carbon monoxide alarm in the immediate vicinity
of Bedroom Two and Bedroom Three per R315.
c.Clarify on the plans the difference in the indicated location of the proposed furnace
and of that noted for the proposed air handler on the City of Edmonds Residential
Building Permit Application Form A.
d.Clarify the callout for RB-1 4x10 DF #2 to be used to support the loads over
the window in the north wall of the Master Bedroom. It appears to be over spanned
and fails in bending when the roof trusses are placed as anticipated to result in the
roofline represented on sheets A1, A2, and A7 see also plan review comment
# 5 below.
On sheet A7:
5.Roof Framing Plan Clarify the difference in the indicated roof truss layout and the roofline
indicated on sheets A1 and A2. It appears that a hip master truss oriented north-south
over the Master Bedroom may be missing see also plan review comment #4.d above.
Page 2 of 2