Loading...
2015-1103 Reid - 2nd Review.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: December 28, 2015 TO: Julie Evans Reid julie@jmdesignseattle.com FROM: Andrew Gahan, Plans Examiner nd RE: Plan Check: BLD2015-1103, 2 Review Project: Accessory Building th Project Address: 9423 215 Street SW nd During a 2 review of the plans by the Building Division for the above noted project, it was found that the following information, clarifications, or changes are still needed. A complete review cannot including a written response be performed until the revised plans/documents, indicating where the ‘clouded’ or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted to a Permit Coordinator. Reviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may result in additional comments. The original comments can be found in italics, with any additional comments in regular text below please include a written the original comments. Again, to help guide and expedite proper review, response to each of the following items : 1.Please specify the framing members to be used to support the roof diaphragm. This item has not been addressed. Specification of the framing members to be used is required for several reasons, including structural adequacy and method of achieving the proper insulation value. 2.Provide a double top-plate at the top of the wall. OK 3.While IRC 403.1.4.1, Exception 3 exempts the foundation from requiring freeze protection, per IRC 403.1.4 at the top of the same section requires that the footings be placed a minimum of 12” below the undisturbed soil. Please revise. A response to this item could not be found on the plans. Please specify the minimum depth of the footing to be used, or provide an alternate path of compliance. The above-referenced Exception 3 has a maximum eave height of 10’, but the plans show the maximum eave height is 10’-6”. Please address this comment. 4.Without the approval of an engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, per IRC 403.1 all exterior walls are to be supported by continuous footings. Please revise. In addition to 6” stem wall shown on the plans, the footing dimensions and reinforcing steel to be used must be specified. In addition, the section view does not match foundation plan. Please reconcile. 5.Please provide a framing plan showing the layout of the proposed floor and deck including specification of the members to be used. The framing plan provided does not address the deck framing. Please provide a framing plan that shows how the deck is to be built. Is it cantilevered? Simple span with posts? Additionally, it is unclear from the section view and framing plan how the structure is to bear on the foundation. It appears there is some kind of pony wall/beam system? Please clarify all of the above elements. 6.Provide a roof framing plan for the proposed structure including specification of the members to be used and connections at the top-plate. This item has not been addressed. The roof framing plan is required for the same reasons given in Item#1. 7.Specify the floor sheathing and nailing pattern to be used. This item has not been addressed. Please specify the above elements on the plans. 8.Considering that the space will be heated, clarify how the structure will comply with Table R402.1.1 of the 2012 Washington State Energy Code regarding insulation minimums. It appears that the above items have been addressed; however more information is needed to avoid unexpected expense and time lost during construction. The target values for insulation per the above-referenced Code section are: R-38 @ roof, R-21 @ walls, and R-38 in the floors. Typical methods of insulating, such as fiberglass batt insulation, may not work within the spaces available. For instance, with fiberglass batt insulation within a 2x4 wall, the maximum R-value possible is R-15. For that reason, specification of the method and materials of insulation to be used for this structure is required. 9.Provide a 50 CFM (minimum) exhaust fan in the proposed bathroom per Table IRC M1507.4. It appears that a smoke detector was provided in the bathroom (not required), but still no exhaust fan could be found. Please provide an exhaust fan within the bathroom per the above-referenced Code section. Page 2 of 2