2015-1559 Abbott SFR 3- Johnson Arch.pdf
City of Edmonds
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
BUILDING DIVISION
(425) 771-0220
DATE: September 27, 2016
TO: Ron Johnson, Architect
ronarchps@outlook.com
FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner
RE: Plan Check: BLD2015-1559
th
Project Address: 16404 75 Place W
Project: Abbott SFR
Scope: Construct single-family residence w/attached garage R-3/U occupancy
group V-B construction - sprinkler system required mechanical and plumbing
included
disapproved
Please be advised that the building plans for the above referenced project have been
for the purposes of obtaining a building permit. During a review of the plans by the Building
Division for compliance with the applicable building codes, it was found that the following
.
information, clarifications, or changes are neededReviews by other divisions, such as Planning,
Engineering, or Fire, may result in additional comments that require attention beyond the scope of
this letter. Items that recur on this list appear in italics.
A complete review cannot be performed until the revised plans/documents, including a
written response in itemized letter format indicating where the clouded or otherwise
highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted to a Permit
Coordinator.
nd
Resubmittals must be made at the Development Services Department on the 2 Floor of City Hall.
Permit Center hours are M, T, Th, & F from 8am-4:30pm and from 8:30am-12pm on Wednesdays.
General Review Notes:
1.Provide as part of a complete submittal structural calculations prepared and stamped by
an engineer supporting the design of the temporary soldier pile walls represented on sheets
1 and 2 of the submitted Grading Plan and sheets A1, A2, and A3 of the
architectural/structural plans for the proposed structures to be constructed under this
permit and permit BLD2015-1602. The response to the earlier plan review comment states:
OK
. No information regarding the design of the temporary soldier pile walls could be
found among the resubmitted documents.
On sheet A7 Upper Floor Plan:
2.Upper Floor Plan Clarify the difference in the identification of the space to the east of the
Loft Area as Open to Room Below and of that anticipated by the construction indicated
in that area on sheet S3 Upper Floor Framing Plan. The plans should consistently
represent the proposed construction to guide proper review, installation, and inspection.
On sheet S5 Section Details:
3.Section 5 West Wall Detail - Provide as part of a complete submittal structural
calculations prepared and stamped by an engineer supporting the design of the grade
See enclosed
beam/foundation wall. The response to the first plan review comment states:
calculations.
. The calculations appear to support the design of a grade beam different than
See
that specified on the plans. The response to the second plan review comment states:
typ. Calcs for 8x24 grade bm.
. The design provided in response (for a 10x18 grade
beam) and none of the other provided designs are for an 8x24 grade beam.
Page 2 of 2