Loading...
2016-0532 Miniaylo retaining walls - GT.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: May 26, 2016 TO: Slavik Miniaylo th 7316 164 Street SW Edmonds, WA 98026 FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner RE: Plan Check: BLD2016-0532 th Project Address: 7316 164 Street SW Project: Miniaylo retaining walls Scope: Repair/rebuild existing unpermitted retaining walls in ESHLA – Chapter 19.10 ECDC and Chapter 23.80 ECDC disapproved Please be advised that the building plans for the above referenced project have been for the purposes of obtaining a building permit. During a review of the plans by the Building Division for compliance with the applicable building codes, it was found that the following . information, clarifications, or changes are neededReviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may result in additional comments that require attention beyond the scope of this letter. A complete review cannot be performed until the revised plans/documents, including a written response in itemized letter format indicating where the ‘clouded’ or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted to a Permit Coordinator. nd Resubmittals must be made at the Development Services Department on the 2 Floor of City Hall. Permit Center hours are M, T, Th, & F from 8am-4:30pm and from 8:30am-12pm on Wednesdays. General Review Note: 1.On the City of Edmonds ‘Residential Building Permit Application’, the noted scope of work is to “Redo (sic) of leaning retaining wall” and the ‘check-box’ for ‘Retaining Wall’ has been selected ‘Yes’ with an added note, “repair”. The application was accepted under the premise that the repair work was to be performed to maintain the purpose and integrity of previously permitted work and that during the review process the allowance for, limitations of, and required construction of the retaining walls would be determined. Unfortunately, during the review process no record of application, review, or approval for the construction of the walls could be found. th Regarding the ‘REVISED Geotechnical Assessment for New Retaining Wall at 7316-164 Street SW’ – reference ‘J 111-01-16’- prepared by Adams Resource Consultants: 2.The following were noted as being reviewed as part of the assessment done in support of the permit application: Letter dated January 7, 2005 from Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc., to Clay · Enterprises. Plan Map titled: “Site Plan for House Construction,” by Partners Architectural, dated · June 10, 1999. Applicable City of Edmonds codes: a) Chapter 23.40 Environmentally Critical Areas · General Provisions, b) Chapter 23.80 Geologically Hazardous Areas and c) Retaining Wall Permit Submittal Requirements #B62. a.Clarify the applicability of the letter from Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. in support of the current permit application. The letter from Cornerstone Geotechnical regards the garden area/concrete planters to the immediate west of the residence driveway that were part of an ‘Order to Correct Violation’, ‘Notice of Civil Violation’, Hearing Examiner decision under case number ‘V-03-173’, and ultimately permitted under permit BLD2004-1037. The approval was for that area alone with a noted condition that “Any future development will be required to demonstrate compliance with the Critical Areas Variance criteria in effect at that time.”. The letter from Cornerstone dated after the Hearing Examiner decision is bound to that condition and does not appear to mention the presence of retaining walls of the height or configuration of those depicted in the provided photographs. b.Clarify the applicability of the Plan Map titled: “Site Plan for House Construction,” by Partners Architectural, dated June 10, 1999 in support of the current application. A City of Edmonds record of it could not be found along the previously submitted documents. The latest ‘Plan Map’ received, reviewed, and approved as part of the permitted work for the house construction under permits BLD1999-0231/BLD2000- 0325 was prepared on 11-2-98 and dated by the Eric Koch, architect for ‘Partners Architectural’ on 11-9-98. It was received by the City of Edmonds as part of a complete permit resubmittal on 11-19-98 and reviewed and approved approximately two weeks later. That ‘Plan Map’, and the others submitted for review prior, do not appear to indicate the presence of retaining walls of the height or configuration of those depicted in the provided photographs. c.Clarify the omission of Chapter 19.10 ECDC in the referenced applicable codes regarding permitted activities allowed in a geologically hazardous area. Chapter 19.10 ECDC is referenced in Chapter 23.80 ECDC and provides the required procedures related to the issuance of permits within designated earth subsidence and landslide hazard areas of the city. The current permit application and the submitted documentation do not meet the requirements of Chapter 19.10 ECDC. Page 2 of 2