Loading...
2016-0561 Willowdale Townhomes 3-unit 2- Wattenbarger Arch.pdf City of Edmonds PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS BUILDING DIVISION (425) 771-0220 DATE: September 12, 2016 TO: Wattenbarger Architects TravisM@Wattenbarger.com FROM: Chuck Miller, Plans Examiner RE: Plan Check: BLD2016-0561 th Project Address: 20730 76 Avenue W, Building C Project: Willowdale Townhomes - 3-unit Scope: Construct 3-dwelling unit structure – IRC R-3/U townhouses – V-B construction - NFPA-13 sprinkler system requirement not required – mechanical and plumbing included disapproved Please be advised that the building plans for the above referenced project have been for the purposes of obtaining a building permit. During a review of the plans by the Building Division for compliance with the applicable building codes, it was found that the following . information, clarifications, or changes are neededReviews by other divisions, such as Planning, Engineering, or Fire, may result in additional comments that require attention beyond the scope of this letter. Items that recur on this list appear in italics. A complete review cannot be performed until the revised plans/documents, including a written response in itemized letter format indicating where the ‘clouded’ or otherwise highlighted changes can be found on the revised plans, have been submitted to a Permit Coordinator. nd Resubmittals must be made at the Development Services Department on the 2 Floor of City Hall. Permit Center hours are M, T, Th, & F from 8am-4:30pm and from 8:30am-12pm on Wednesdays. On sheet S4 – Foundation Plan: 1.Foundation Plan – Indicate on the plans the required construction to support the load below the ‘plan east’ end of ‘Beam 1-11’ – 5-1/8x9 GLB 24F-V4. On sheet S5 – Main Floor Shearwalls & Framing Above: 2.Main Floor Shearwalls & Framing Above - Clarify on the plans the callout for the ‘HDR’ - (2)2x6 beam - over the ‘plan south’ door in the ‘Entry’ of ‘Unit 02’. It appears to be over spanned and fails in bending. Beam calculations for ‘Beam 1-17’ could not be found among A the submitted construction documents. The response to the plan review comments states: “ calculation for Beam (1-17) was performed and determined (2)-2x6 beam is adequate. ”. While a uniform load from ‘FLOOR’ appears to have been accounted for in spite of the ‘open to below’ design, the point loads below the ‘plan south’ end of the 3-1/2x9 GLB 24F- V4 and the ‘plan east’ end of ‘Beam 2-6’ – 4x8 DF #2 – do not appear to have been accounted for. Also note that when designing the beam, the span shall be taken as the distance from face to face of the supports, plus ½ the required bearing length at each end per the American Wood Council (AWC) National Design Specifications for Wood Construction (NDS) 3.2.1. On sheet S6 – Upper Floor Shearwalls & Framing Above: 3.Upper Floor Shearwalls & Framing Above a.Clarify on the plans the callout for ‘Beam 2-12’ – 4x8 DF #2 - over the ‘plan south’ window in the ‘Living Room’ of ‘Unit 02’. It appears to be over spanned and fails in A new beam calc (2-12) bending. The response to the plan review comment states: “ was assessed for the HDR over the “plan south” window in the Living room of unit 2. It was determined that the HDR should be sized as a 4x8 to have capacity large enough to carry the demand load. ”. The point load below the ‘plan east’ end of ‘Beam 3-4’ – 3-1/8x9-1/2 GLB 24F-V4 – does not appear to have been accounted for. b.Clarify on the plans the callout for the 4x4 post below the ‘plan west’ end of ‘Beam 2-4’ – 5-1/8x9 GLB 24F-V4. It appears to be undersized for the loads indicated in the provided structural calculations. The response to the plan review comment A post calculation, 2-4L was run to show the loading beneath the beam states: “ (2-4). A 4x4 post is adequate to carry the load created by the beam. ”. The concern regarding the size of the post below the ‘plan west’ end of ‘Beam 2-4’ is not the post itself, but instead is the anticipated bottom plate (where hem-fir is typically used) used to support the post. The bearing ‘footprint’ of the supported load appears to be greater than the allowable perpendicular to grain compression (Fb). If a 4x4 post is to be used, indicate on the plans the required bearing directly on the sub-floor sheathing, a ‘base-plate’ type of framing connector, or other means to distribute the load over the bearing surface. Page 2 of 2