20160713141637.pdfCITY OF EDMONDS CORRECTION NOTICE #2 RESPONSE
TEN GUN OFFICE T.I., PROJECT #BLD20160329
OVERVIEW
ENGINEERING REVIEW
FIRE REVIEW
PLANNING REVIEW
DST TRACKI NG
BUILDING REVIEW
BUILDING REVIEW
APPROVED
APPROVED
APPROVED
CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
CORRECTIONS REQUIRED
On sheets A1.0, A1.3, and A1.4 — Proposed Floor Plan:
Chuck Miller
Chuck Miller
Floor Plan — Clarify the indicated height of seating/surfaces in space "123" — Coffee Bar. They do
not appear to meet the requirements of IBC 1108.2.9.1/1109.11 and ICC A117.1 2009 sections
902 and 903. The response to the plane review comments states: "Not a primary function not
required to be ADA accessible per IBC 1109." The scoping requirements of IBC 1103.1 require
that facilities, elements, and spaces shall be accessible, with exemptions as allowed per IBC
1104 through 1110. There does not appear to be any qualifying language regarding the 'primary
function' of the facility, element, or space in those sections. IBC 3411.7 requires that certain
facilities serving an area of 'primary function', such as toilets, drinking fountains, and
telephones, be included in the scope of work, even if outside of where the alterations affecting
the area of primary function are to be completed. IBC 3411.6 requires that a facility that is
altered comply with the applicable provisions of IBC Chapter 11.
agreedRESPONSE: Per the July 1", 2016 phone conversation with Chuck Miller and David Squires, both
parties
single (1) ADA height seat at the Coffee Bar amenity for equal access. See revised Coffee Bar
seating on A1.0, A1.4 and
2. Floor Plan (A1.0, A1.3, and A1.4 — Proposed Floor Plan) Clarify the added note —'NEW 1.5HR —
Door' — and the wall construction callout — P3 — near space '108' — Exit. Those elements
appeared to be represented as existing in the earlier submittal, although different than shown
on the plans for the original construction under permit BLD1993-0593. If new construction is to
be performed in this area, accommodations to meet the accessible route requirements per IBC
1103.2.3 and ICC A117.1-2009 section 404.2.3.2/Table 404.2.3.2 for door'R01' at the north end
of space '109' — Hall A — should be made unless technically infeasible.
RESPONSE: Mallet has clarified the confusion in this area. The only new construction is the new
rated door and rated wall that propose to shorten the existing permitted (BLD1993-0593) hall to
no lonN.er include the restroom areas. qf A 1W xr*-�2 11W-Az1rom- i M
length with a new door and wall. Any doors and walls that were existing in that hallway
(including those connecting the hall to 107 Mechanical Room A and the existing stair to the 2 Id
1floor) will remain as existing. An added note stating "Existing rated door, door hardware, and
walls to remain, contractor to veriLbrA" has been added to these areas on all fieridumWiT13- W--m-
sheetsand
3. On sheet A1.6 —Egress Plan: Informational Only— No response required.