20180521141354.pdfMay 9, 2017
Strobl Design
Jacob Strobl
PO Box 20764
Seattle, WA 98102
J ,pt@stro1.)1des� orn
(206) 661-3622
Mike Clugston
Associate Planner
City of Edmonds
(425) 771-0220
Re: Plan Check: BLD20171839
Planning Review Comments
Dear Mike,
Please see the below responses to the correction notice dated February 8, 2018 for 19015 Olympic View
Drive, plan check number BLD20171839.
Correction #1
Geotech report: Please have Mr. Glandon update his January 11,2017 report to address this specific
single family development proposal including the house, driveway, retaining walls, etc.
Response:
See response from Mr. Glandon dated May 5, 2018 addressing correction item #1.
Correction #2
2. Critical area notice to title: Per ECDC 23.40.270. 8, sites with field -verified presence of critical areas
and/or critical area buffers for which a permit application is submitted must as a condition of permit
issuance, record a notice of the existence of the critical area and/or critical area buffer against the
property with the Snohomish County Auditor's Office. Attached is a Notice of Presence of Critical Areas.
Please sign and notarize this document. Prior to issuance of the building permit, this form must be
recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor's Office.
Response:
Critical Area Notice will be filed with the county by the property owner prior to permit issuance.
uuu wii UB
MAY 18 2018
Correction #3
Vegetation management plan: This project is subject to the vegetation management plan produced with
the associated short plat in P1N20140075. Native vegetation in the amount of 993 sq. ft. on the subject
lot (Lot B) must be retained or created with the single family project.
The clearing extent on the SWPPP (Sheet 2 of the civil plans) shows 'no disturbance' areas along the east
property line consistent with what was shown with the short plat. At the same time, the Site Plan (Sheet
A2) shows new deciduous trees along the east property line.
Verify whether the 'no disturbance' areas will remain intact. If those areas remain undisturbed during the
development process, no additional native planting will be required. However, if those areas are
disturbed during development, native replanting in the amount of 993 sq.ft. will be required. That area
must then be visually shown and a native plant schedule be called out on Sheet A2.
Response•
See revised sheet A2 with added vegetation management plan.
Correction #4
An "awning above entry" is shown on the Main Floor Plan. This feature doesn't seem to appear on other
sheets or it isn't labeled as such. If an awning is part of the project, show and label it on the plans
(including Sheet 52) noting that it can only project into the required east setback a maximum of 30
inches similar to an eave.
Response•
The awning above the entry has been removed from the project see revised sheet A3.
Correction #5
Retaining walls in setbacks. Retaining walls may only be 3' above original grade where located within a
required setback area. There are portions of wall within
the east, south and west setback areas. It appears that portions of several walls
within the south setback may be taller than 3'. Where located within a setback,
show the existing grade and top of wall elevations at LO foot intervals and
ensure the walls are no greater than 3' where located in a required setback.
Response:
See revised grading plan on sheet 3 of 6 of the civil engineering plans. Retaining walls within the
setback do not extend more than 3' above the existing grade.
These items resolve the plan corrections for the project. Please let me know if you have any questions.
Best Regards,
Jacob Strobl