20180803134611.pdfKe1li Martin
thepermitnetwork@ gmail. com
206-354-1445
Date: August L,2OI8
Kernen Lien, Environmental Programs Manager, City of Edmonds
kernen.lien @edmondswa.gov
From: Kelli Martin, Permit Specialist, The Permit Network
thepermitnetwork@gmail. com
Re:Second Round Comments Response Letter- PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW
Application #: 81D20180354
Project: James Weis- Single Family Residence
Project Address: L6630 74th Pl W
The purpose of this letter is to address additionalcomments received from you on July 1'L,2018
regarding the aforementioned project. For your convenience and to expedite the review and approval
process, your original comments are included and our responses are provided in BOLD.
The following new or revised documents are incorporated by reference herein
¡ Revised Grading and TESC Plan Cl of 2
¡ Revised Stormwater and Utility Plan C2 of 2
o Revised site plan SP
. Geotechnical Plan Review Letter dated June 14, 2018
PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW
1. Geotechnical Report: Not Addressed. The geotechnical report submitted with the building
permit application does not address the requirements of ECDC 23.80.060 or ECDC 23.80.070
Please submit a geotechnical report addendum that specifically addresses the required
findings in ECDC 23.80.060.4 and ECDC 23.80.070.
July 1 1,2A18 Comment: The June 14,2A18 Geotechnical Plan Review Letter does not
address the specific requirements of ECDC 23.80.060 or FCDC 23.80.070. Please subm¡t a
geCItechn¡cal report addendum the specifically addresses the required findings of ECDC
23.80.060.4 and ECDC 23.80.070"
Respondent: Carston Curd, GIT and M. Khaled Shawish, PE, Nelson Geotechnical
Associates, lnc.
Response: see updated Geotechnical Plan Review Letter dated July 31, 2018' see
Comment Response section starting on page 2 and see Minimum Risk Statement
starting on page 4
4. Side Sewer: lf the existing side sewer is not approved to be reused, new side sewer would
need to be relocated outside the stream buffer.
Respondent: Jacob D. Mealey, P.E., lnsight Engineering
Response: lssued revised Civil Engineering Site Plan C2 of 2- see Note 11 revised as
RESUB
AUt 0 2 2018
follows:
eugffiffi¡B5ur
IF A NEW SEWER LATERAL JS DETERMINED TO BE REQUIRED, AND THE
CONNECT¡ON WILL BE CORE DRILLED, THE CONNECTION AT THE SEWER MAIN WILL
NEED TO BE A ROMAC INSERT A-TEE OR IF THE SEWER CONNECTION WILL BE CUT
IN, A WYE IS TO BE INSTALLED. THE NEW S¡DE SEWER WOULD NEED TO BE
LOCATED OUTSIDE THE BUFFER
Other:
Please note that the architectural Site Plan drawing SP has been revised to conform to
the revised Civil Engineering Site Plan C 1 of 2 and C2 o'f 2
Respondent: Doug Williams' Doug Williams Design
Response: see revised Architectural Site Plan SP
lf you have questions or need additional information, please call or e-mail me at
thepermitnetwork@gm ail. com
Respectfully,
Kelli Martin, Permit Specialist
Page2 of 3