The URL can be used to link to this page

20191025085003 Debra Tree Risk Assessment.pdfClient Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form �asi —Ldl-L-J - 11 Date- 1(� /22 Irl Address/Tree lolation I a Q, 2 C. Time 'D Tree species NA re� no. Sheet I oi —EAMSID� �T ZIV—d- —e-ma-1) t. A r% r dbh'-it%1* � tl.;Y Height Assessor(s)—.., >4� �WOA � Crown spread dia. Time frame Tools used 'r,.--& A - essment, Ta Target zone Occupancy A - 11 & -S 3; L g rate -rare 2-occasional 0 49 r B L g E ; 3 - frequent 4 - constant 2 a. E K >( X Sito Factors History of failures Topography FlatO SIopW;j- Y- Aspect Sitechanges Nonp-ET Gradechange-0 SiteclearingO Changedsoll hydrologyO RootcutsO Describe Sollconclitions Limited volume 0 Saturated 0 Shallow[] CompactedElavement over rootsff ?- Describe Prevailing wind direction ' -LL-Yll rke-L&W, Common weather Str ng winds.21ce 0 Snow 0 Heavy raip43" llescrlbe-�%, 11P , r-., k 0 wua INN k I M it " �nd Sneelpe Prnffla Vigor Low[] Normal 0 High El Foliage None (seasonal) [I Pests ? I k Species failure profile Branches[] Trunk[] Roots[] Describp None (cleaOM- Normal % Chlorotic—% Necrotic —% Abiotic i . A�. , --- ik — - V .6 1 . Factors Windexposure ProtectedEl PartialD Fujg@-VWind funneling 0 Relative crown size Small[] Medium[] Large[3 Crowndensity SparseE] NormalEl DenseE] Interior branches FewO Normal[] Dense[] Vines/Mistietoe/Mo Recent or planned change in load factors tS%,0_rj9 P'13---UL� Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting,the Likelihood. of.Fallure — Crown and Branche's — Unbalanced crown 0 LCR Dead twigs/branche;.� Lq�pyoverall Max.dia. Broken/Hangers Number Max.dia,— Over-extended branches 0 Pruning history Crown cleaned 11 Thinned [I Raised 0 Reduced 0 Topped 0 Lion -tailed 0 Flush cuts 0 Other Main concern(s) 4 r Q a 5-kcj v 4 : a \ An, Cracks 0 Lightning damage 0 Codominant 0 Included bark El Weak attachments El Cavity/Nest hole __y,, circ, Previous branch failures El Similar branches present 11 Dead/Missing bark [I cankers/Galls/Buris 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Conks 11 Heartwood decay 0 Response growth -------------- t71— Load on defect N/A 0 Minor El Moderate 0 SignificantQ- Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible 0 Probable-EJ- Imminent 11 —Trunk — Dead/Missing bark,21-- Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Codominant stems 0 Included bark 11 Cracks,-Er�r, Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls [J Sap ooze El Lichtnin.- damage[] Heartwood decay0 Conks/MushroomsO 'Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth_ Poor taper 0 Lean—* Corrected?— Response growth I�ain concern(s) L Load on defect N/A 0 Minor El Moderate [3 ignifi t-Er- Likelihood of failure ImprobableO Possible 0 !ProbabI&4!T— Imminent 11 — Roots and Root Collar — Collar buried/Notvisible El Depth_ Stem girdling 0 p_ Dead 2-� Decay 0 Conks/Mushrooms 0 Ooze 1:1 Cavity 0 —Y. circ. Cracks 11 Cut/Damaged roots[] Distance from trunk — Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness [I Response growth Main concern(s) Q- Load on defect N/A[1 MinorEl ModerateEl SignificaUt.2- Likelihood of failure Improbable[] Possible El Probab]B-B' Imminent 0 Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely .Probable Unlikely_ Unlikely Somewhat likely_. Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of FailUre & Impact Consequences of Failure Negligible I Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate Extreme Likely Low Moderate -High,- H i gih High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low North Notes, explanations, descriptions Mitigation options Residu al r . isk Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low[] Moderate 1:1 Hig ,h,Q' Extreme D Work priority 113 2 11 3 13 4�0— Overall residual risk Low oderate 11 High El Extreme El Recommended inspection interval Data,C]ITinal [-]Preliminary Advanced assessment needed EJNo OYes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ONone OVIsibility OAccess,2101nes []Root collar buried Describe IQ %�k This datasheet was produced by the International Society ofArboriculture (ISA)'and is intended for use b Tree RlskAssessment Qualified (TRAQ) arborlsts - 2013 t Page 2 of 2 ISA. Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form Client L"N14 %� Address/Tree location Treespecies �A-,Y Assessor(s) C- eA ry-% CHIN cl 142, Date 1& 12 1 llc� Time 2 1, &> 1,5r o Z C, Tree no. Sheet 04 Oi r,,k r& a M � r dbh1ik%k%5,+ Height 'rail t!A Iff Crown spread dia, Time frame Tools used ki ; s s%4 cX -� A-- t - I . ." . 'k- — W E Ta getzone Occupancy rate I -rare r" .6 t X .5 C Target clescrIption INQ 14 Ln occaslonal W A L 3 - frequent 4 c onstant 12 66 E Mw CL 14 m R 2 X 3 4 History of failures :2,t,QM� Topography FlatO Aspect Site changes NoneO'Grade change 0 Site clearing 0 Changed soil hydrology 0 Root cuts 11 Describe " Soil conditions Limited volume 0 Saturated 0 Shallow 0 CompacteAQPavement over rool�sa-K5 _YG Describe Prevailing wind direction IvO Common weather Strong winds,01ce 0 Snow 0 Heavy raia43' Dascribe -rt� L>k,� s 4r I T% "a - .4OX, t, 4r bTqNQ- 4rMC\ vylxr�"Prekr%alth and Species Profile I Vigor Low 0 Normal 0 High 0 Foliage None (seasonal)[] None (deadLEr-Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests \N,1k e % r\ k�\, i V,&tk- Ablotic r- , mCet A- tt f� j tN \ tn N tor k Species failure profile BranchesO Trunk[] RootsO Describe— C",\, "t �-, Load Winclexposure Protected[] Partial[] FU)JZ-Wind funneling 0 Relative crown size SmallO MediumO LargeD Crowndensity SparseO NormalO DenseO Interior branches Few[] NormalD DenseD Vines/Mistietoe/Mos Recent or planned change in load factors K�c,�v:- Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure Crown and Branches Unbalanced crown 11 LCR Dead twigs/branches-a �-O�Yooverall Max.dia. Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Over -extended branches 0 Pruning history Crown cleaned 0 Thinned 0 Raised 0 Reduced 11 Topped 0 Lion -tailed El Flush cuts 0 Other. Main concern(s) �,NjL*,�, Cracks El Codominant 0 Weak attachments El Previous branch failures 0 Dead/Missing bark 13 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 0 Response growth Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 0 Moderate [I SignificanAD-- Likelihood of failure Improbable 0 Possible 0 ProbableO-, Imminent 0 - —Trunk — Dead/Missing barl�� Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Codominant stems [I Included bark 0 Cracks 0 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 Sap ooze IJ Lightning damage 0 Heartwood decay 0 Conks/Mushrooms 0 -'Aest hole % circ. Depth (<2r�v5lty _ Poor taper 0 Lean —' Corrected? Response growth Main concem(s) -LUL Load on defect N/A 0 Minor 03 Moderate E3 Signific n�� Likelihood of failure ImprobableD Possible 0 Probablg,2- Imminent 13 -A ",\se'A T q, �4 V ov\c, +o, k..'N Lightning damage 0 — IncludedbarkO Cavity/Nest hole —Yo circ. Similar branches present 0 Sapwood damage/decay El — Roots and Root Collar — Collar buried/NotvisibleEl Depth_ Stem girdling 0 Deao-C— Decay 0 Conks/Mushrooms 0 Ooze 11 Cavity 0 ----YO circ. iCracks 0 Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk_ Root plate lifting 13 Soil weakness 0 Response growth Mainconcern(s) 1-2AZA rcAni �4 g, m"g- 4-1\A kv-t JP -, "1',C,,,T-ft, �21:1',EM6 4�71, Load on defect N/AE3 MinorEl ModerateO SignificarA4a— Likelihood of failure Improbable 11 Possible EI Probable4n— Imminent 0 Page I of 2 Risk Categorization Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood of impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely — Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely— �nlikely Somewhat likely Improbable, Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk ratinje matrix. Likelihood of Failure & impact Consequences of Failure 'Negligible Minor Significant Severe — Very likely Low Moderate High,- Extrem e — Likely Low Moderate Hi�h Hrgh Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions '.s— Mitigation options 'QkXX\F1'�A--L. k�'\X vrl'A�1-21 Residual r . isk Residual risk North Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate 0 High_12--Extreme 0 Work priority 10 2 1:1 3 D Overall residual risk Lo%y� Moderate 0 High 0 Extreme 0 Recommended inspection interval A v, Data,[�Rnal 11 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ONo OYes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ONone []Visibility DAccessj2V—ines ORoot collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society ofArboriculture (ISA) al)d is intended for use by . Tree Risk;Assessment Qualified oT . 0 1 . I RAQ) arbo.r1sts - 2013 Page 2 of 2