526 DAYTON ST.pdfF W� #
DATE
FEE
CITY OF EDMONDS
RECT #
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
APO'S
APPLICATION FOR V LIANCE
HEARING DATE -
APPLICANT METCO CONSTRUCTION, INC. ADDRESS 17018 15th N.E.
PHONE 3 3-0 16
CITY &
M OF INTEREST IN PROPERTY
INDICATE TYPE OR DEGRF
LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF PROPERTY
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Exce t the E—as—t _lO f�eet 0�fL �10,
s
Mo d Pd
recordsof Snohomis
reqU s numimn of 5600 square feet for,a three-
zonin 3
VARIANCE REQUESTED: Pres S1 _--Ke. uare feet; variance
includes 55UU sq
residential unit structure; existing ownership
are-fOOt.10t-
r stea to allow ee units on 550Q squ-
0
FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
ZONE:
USE
-C-7
00
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIRE14E NT:
STATE OF WASHINGTON) ss. & OM P.S.
APR 2 8'80 WILLI
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH)
'Car OF EOMONUS By,
PtANNING Ofpr.' :t 7 Co.
signature of Applicant,owner,
Representative
Public d for th� state
on this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary In o
3 /'q(3 M S-
" �9,7 714 j �ms - o
red_!a/ /L3 t
of Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appea 7"
his/her oath depo ses and says that (s)he has prepared
who, being duly sworn, on
and read the attached stat ements and has acknowledged to me that the recititations
his/her free and
contained therein are true, and has signed this instrument as
t�her��einenrttioned.
voluntary act and deed for the purposes
19
Subscribed and sworn to before me th:is ay
;of,
Notary Public in and foritte State of Washington,
residing at
'7)
77-
�# 11 - k
DECLARATIONS OF APPLICANT 4PR
Please answer all questions
What are the physical characteristics, (i.e. topography, shape
of lot, etc.) which create a hardship for you in regard to
development of your property?
This ownership is only 50 feet wide by 110 feet deeiD. resultincr in 5500
square feet of land art-;;._
2. How does your property differ from other property in the same
. vicinity?
Most lots in the , ini are fill, -4 n -F�+ ls
Providing a 1f) Y I In nr 6600 square...foot area.
3. Will this variance be detrimental to the public or damaging to
other property or improvements in the vicinity?
4. What hardships will result to you if the variance is not granted?
Will these hardships have been caused by your own action?
5. Can you make reasonable use of your property without the variance?
Yes, duplex. However, this -use will be less cost effective than a three Plex.
Result will be a lower quality structure than if the variance is allowed.
11
men t
d of AdJMLL__
Record of Findings of !act bY Boar
of
Adjustment for the C1 ty of Edmonds finds in the case
The,Board of
t
Fi I e No. ___T- 30 request for variance a
the following:
ffidavits attesting to same
at notice was given according to Code requirements, and A
1. Th
are in the file.
2. That the foregoing set forth Standards and Criteria each have/have not been met.
3. In addition that
is4bgdoWGranted, subject to the folloiling special
4. Therefore, the request for variance
condi tions:
K
it is not obtained
".---and if a building permit and/or occupancy �%_Irm
S. Section 12.16-110 ie year from the date of the Board's decision, the con
lie sub Troperty within or
ariance shall be automatically null and void.---"
tional use permit or v
ision shall be effective on:
Dec
6.
ail
TED: Chairman, rd 4oA us —tim e _nt
. _._ZZJ94Z
DATA
Date of Hearing:
Date of Application:
Continuances:_
Date of Publication:
K
Date of Posting: —
Date of Appeal from Decision of tlic Board:
* ec ary, 0 ard of ustment
...... .......... .. .
METCO CONSTRUCTION, INC., VARIANCE APPLICATION
AK2
SUPPLEMENT TO CITY OF [MAM,6Z
PLANNING OWL
ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT VA -
The property for which applicant seeks a variance is in the
original plat of the City of Edmonds and consists of one 30 foot
lot (Lot 9) and the west 20 feet of another lot (Lot 10). These
lots are 110 feet, and total 5500 square feet of area. U ' nder
existing zoning this falls 100 square feet short of the requirement
for three residential units in this RMH zone. The requested
variance is to allow three units in this space. The following
comments are addressed to the standards and criteria to be
considered by the Board:
1. It clearly appears that the requested variance will not
amount to a rezone in any respect and definitely will not change
existing district boundaries.
2. The primary special circumstance in this case is essentially
that the property is only nominally below the zone requirement,
that is, by 100 square feet. Applicants propose to build a three
unit apartment on the site and we submit that this use and density
is entirely compatible -with adjoining properties'and uses; across
the alley to the south is the Laurantine Condominium, and adjoining
to the west is the Milltown complex. A three unit structure'on
this property will be entirely in harmony with adjoining uses.
3. No special conditions or problems of which applicants are
aware would result from approval of this variance.
4. There is a certain degree of hardship imposed upon
applicant if only two units, are allowed instead of three on this
site, at least when compared to adjoining property such as The
Laurantine.
5. We can conceive no detriment to the public health, safety,
morals or welfare, or injury to the property or improvements in
the vicinity if this variance is granted.
6. The granting of the requested variance will be entirely
in harmony and compatible with the existing code and zoning
classifications, and surely with the intent of such ligislation.
No problems are anticipated with regard to noise, sanitation,
traffic, pollution, erosion, vibration, or physical hazard.
In short, applicants feel their request for a variance is
entirely reasonable and submit that there is no substantive
objection that can be raised.