6b - P71-SEPA_Checklist_SIGNED.pdf#P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
St. IS,7)
Purpose of Checklist.
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructionsfor Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and careftilly, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklistfor nonprojectproposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area, " respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: SH 09020 WALGREENS EDMONDS
2. Name of applicant: BAYSINGER PARTNERS ARCHITECTURE PC WILLIAM M. RUECKER
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
1006 SE GRAND AVE #300
PORTLAND, OR 97214
503.546.1600
4. Date checklist prepared: 12.15.2011
5. Agency requesting checklist: City ofEdmonds
Revised on 4120110 Page I of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable): APPROXIMATE DATES ARE:
SUBMIT FOR LAND USE REVIEW: DECEMBER 22,2011
SUBMIT FOR PERMIT: APRIL 1, 2012
BEGIN CONSTRUCTION: MAY 1, 2012 FINISH CONSTRUCTION: NOVEMBER 1, 2012
(STAFF COMMENTS)
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
NO
(STAFF COM ME
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
A GEOTECHNICAL REPORT WILL BE PREPARED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 2 of'24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW FROM CITY OF EDMONDS
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this cbecklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BOWLING ALLEY BUILDING. CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATLEY
14,490 SF RETAIL (PHARMACY) BUILDING WITH DRIVE -UP SERVICE WINDOW. CONSTRUCTION OF
AN APPROXIMATELY 3,373 SF BANK PAD BUILDING WITH 3 DRIVE -THROUGH LANES. SITE WORK
WILL INCLUDE CODE COMPLIANT LANDSCAPING AND APPROXIMATELY 19 NEW VEHICULAR
PARKING STALLS. APPROXIMATELY 233 LINEAL FEET OF RETAILING WALL WILL BE REQUIRED
ALONG NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINES.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
SNOHOMISH COUNTY TAX ACCOUNT PARCEL #: 27033600113200 & 27033600113300
ADDRESS: 9801 EDMONDS WAY, EDMONDS, WA (JUST EAST OF NE CORNER OF 100TH AVE WEST
AND EDMONDS WAY)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 3 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
FULLY DEVELOPED WITH EXISTING BUILDING, PARKING AND LANDSCAPING. ROLLIN
GENERALLY A FLAT SITE WITH STEEP VEGETATED HILL ALONG NORTH AND EAST
b.
PROPERTY LINE.
(STAFF COMMENTS
What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)'!
(STAFF COMME
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
URBAN FILL
(STAFF CO
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe..
NO
(STAFF COMM
Revised on 4120110 Page 4 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of flu.
VACATED RIGHT OF WAY ALONG EAST PROPERTY LINE WILL BE GRADED TO MATCH
EXISTING SITE GRADING; APPROXIMATELY 1,000 CY OF REGRADING REQUIRED.
(STAFF COMMENTS
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9- About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
APPROXIMATELY 86.41 % IMPERVIOUS
(STAFF COMMENTS)
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES AND DEVICES AND REGRADING ONLY TO THE
EXTENT NECESSARY
(STAFF COMM
2. AIR
a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
DURING CONSTRUCTION: DUST, EQUIPMENT EXHAUST
AFTER COMPLETION: AUTOMOBILE EXHAUST
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 5 of 24 1`71 - SEPA Checklist
b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
STANDARD CONSTRUCTION TECHNIQUES FOR EMISSION CONTROL AND MODERN
EQUIPMENT WITH FILTERED EXHAUST
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 6 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
(5) Does the proposal He within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
INFILTRATION PLANTERS WILL POTENTIALLY DISCHARGE WATER TO GROUND WATER,
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 7 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals ... ; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
LIMITED TO BUILDING, SIDEWALK AND PARKING LOT RUN OFF
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water);
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
INFILTRATION PLANTERS AND A LIMITED L.I.D. SYSTEM WITH OVER FLOW TO EXISTING
STORM SEWERS WILL BE USED FOR COLLECTION, TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF
BUILDING, SIDEWALK AND PARKING LOT RUN OFF
(STAFF COMMENTS
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
LIMITED TO BUILDING, SIDEWALK AND PARKING LOT RUN OFF
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
CONTROLLED THROUGH THE USE OF INFILTRATiON PLANTERS AND A LIMITED L.I.D. SYSTEM
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 8 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
X shrubs
— grass
— pasture
— crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
other types of vegetation:
(STAFF COMMENTS)- —
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANTERS CONTAINING LANDSCAPE TREES AND SHRUBS WILL BE
REMOVED/ALTERED. EXISTING VEGETATED SLOPE, MOSTLY HIMALAYAN BLACKBERRY, IVY
AND ALDER, ON NORTH AND EAST PROPERTY LINE WILL BE MODIFIED TO ALLOW FOR
INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED RETAINING WALL. TOTAL AREA TO BE REMOVED OR ALTERED
IS APPROXIMATELY 14,014.72 SF
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONEKNOWN
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 9 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
NATIVE VEGETATION INCLUDES SALAL, VINE MAPLE, KINNIKINNICK, WESTERN YARROW,
SWORD FERN,PACIFIC COAST IRIS WITH STANDARD URBAN LANDSCAPE TREES, SHRUBS,
GRASSES AND GROUNDCOVERS. EXISTING NATIVE DOUG FIRS VEGETATION ALONG NORTH
PROPERTY LINE WILL BE RETAINED AND UNDISTURBED
(STAFF COMMENT
5. Animals
a. Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
fish: bass, salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, other:-_
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 10 of'24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
ELECTRIC - AIR CONDITIONING, LIGHTING
NATURAL GAS - HEATERS
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
DAYLIGHTING, ENERGY EFFICIENT SHELL IN EXCESS OF CODE REQUIREMENTS, SHADING
DEVICES. LIGHT SHELVES AND OCCUPANCY SENSORS ON LIGHTING
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page I I of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
STANDARD CLEANING SUPPLIES AND PHARMACEUTICALS ARE SOLD
(STAFF CO
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
TRAFFIC
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 12 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
CONSTRUCTION: STANDARD WORK HOURS OF 8 AM TO 5 PIVI
TRAFFIC & BUSINESS OPERATION: STANDARD BUSINESS HOURS OF APPROXIMATELY
8 AM - 10 PM
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
OVERALL TRAFFIC COUNTS WILL REDUCE FROM EXISTING USE TO PROPOSED USES
THEREBY REDUCING NOISE IMPACTS FROM TRAFFIC. DURING CONSTRUCTION
MACHINERY WILL NOT IDLE UNUSED FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
SITE IS CURRENTLY OCCUPIED BY A BOWLING ALLEY AND APPROXIMATELY 31 VEHICULAR
PARKING STALLS. ADJACENT PARCEL TO THE WEST IS A GROCERY STORE/NATURAL FOOD
MARKET
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 13 of 24 P71 - SEPA Che'cklist
C. Describe any structures on the site.
A BUILDING APPROXIMATELY 24,000 SQUARE FEET IN AREA THAT IS OCCUPIED BY A
BOWLING ALLEY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
YES. ALL OF THE EXISTING BUILDING WILL BE DEMO'D
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
BN - NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS
f.
(STAFF COMMENTS
What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
(STAFF COMMENTS).
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 14 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
h. Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify.
N 0
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
20 EMPLOYEES, 0 RESIDENTS
(STAFF COMMENTS)
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
5 EMPLOYEES, 0 RESIDENTS
(STAFF COMMENTS)
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
CREATION OF USES THAT HAVE HIGHER STAFFING NEEDS THEREBY CREATING MORE JOB
OPPORTUNITES
(STAFF COMMENTS)
1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if
any:
ALL PROPOSED USES ARE ALLOWED UNDER BOTH THE CURRENT ZONING AND COMP PLAN
DESIGNATONS THROUGH THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 15 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMM
b. Approximately how many units, if any would he eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMME
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
TALLEST HEIGHT OF PHARMACY BUILDING: APPROXIMATELY 25 FEET
TALLEST HEIGHT OF BANK PAD BUILDING: APPROXIMATELY 22 FEET
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 16 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
NO SIGNIFICANT VIEWS WOULD BE ALTERED OR OBSTRUCTED
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
(STAFF COMMENTS) - - -
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
THERE WILL BE BUILDING LIGHTING (INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR) FOR BOTH BUILDINGS AS
WELL AS PARKING LOT LIGHTING. INTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING WOULD OCCUR UNTIL
CLOSE OF BUSINESS AT APPROXIMATELY 10 PM
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
NONE
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 17 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
LIGHTS WILL BE SHIELDED AND FACILITIES DO NOT OPERATION 24 HOURS A DAY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
THE SITE CURRENTLY HOUSES A BOWLING ALLEY. NO OTHER KNOWN RECREATIONAL
OPPORTUNITIES IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
YES, THE BOWLING ALLEY WILL BE DEMOLISHED
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
provided by the project or applicant, if any:
NONE. THERE ARE NO RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES INCLUDED AS PART OF THE
PROPOSED PROJECT
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 18 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMMENT.S)-
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY
(STAFF COMMENTS)-
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
THE SITE FRONTS ON EDMONDS WAY (STATE HIGHWAY 104). ACCESS IS CURRENTLY
EXISTING AT TWO LOCATIONS ALONG THE FRONTAGE. THESE LOCATIONS WILL REMAIN
UNCHANGED.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 19 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
YES
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
THE PROJECT INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 19 VEHICULAR PARKING STALLS
THE SITE CURRENTLY HAS APPROXIMATLEY 31 VEHICULAR PARKING STALLS WHICH WILL
BE REMOVED
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS
Revised on 4120110 Page 20 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur. .
780 NET NEW TRIPS PER DAY
85 NET NEW TRIPS DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR
110 NET NEW TRIPS DURING WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR
(STAFF COMMENTS)
9. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
NONE. THE EXISTING BOWLING ALLEY GENERATES AN APPROXIMATE TOTAL OF 1,450 DAILY
TRIPS WITH 110 DURING WEEKDAY AM PEAK HOUR AND 120 DURING THE WEEKDAY PM PEAK
HOUR WHICH MEAN THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL RESULT IN A REDUCTION IN TRAFFIC ON
THE ROADWAYS.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
NO
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
DOES NOT APPLY AS THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS NOT EXPECTED TO RESULT IN AN
INCREASED NEED FOR PUBLIC SERVICES
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 21 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: I electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
I sanitary sewer, septic system, other: I
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
CONNECT TO EXISTING UTILITIES AS REQUIRED
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. SIGNATURE
I declare u penalty of pc �ra-wstmat the ove answers are true and correct to the best of m knowledge. I understand
orJury cm
that 9thel a licy is r- yin .6n- Ld ak ts decision.
g
Signature o
Submitted
Revised on 412 0/10 Page 22 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
D. SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS
(do not use this sheetforproject actions)
Because these questions are very general, it may be helpful to read them in conjunction with the list of the elements of the
environment.
When answering these questions, be aware of the extent the proposal, or the types of activities likely to result from the
proposal, would affect the item at a greater intensity or at a faster rate than if the proposal were not implemented. Respond
briefly and in general ten-ns.
1. How would the proposal be likely to increase discharge to water; emissions to air; production, storage, or release of
toxic or hazardous substances; or production of noise?
THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL LIKELY NOT INCREASE ANY DISCHARGES TO AIR, WATER, OR THE
PRODUCTION, STORAGE, RELEASE OF TOXIC OR HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES OR PRODUCTION OF
NOISE THAN THE CURRENT FULLY DEVELOPED URBAN SITE
Proposal measures to avoid or reduce such increases are:
DOES NOT APPLY
2. How would the proposal be likely to affect plants, animals, fish, or marine life?
THERE IS SOME EXISTING LANDSCAPE MATERIALS THAT WILL BE REMOVED BUT NO NATURAL AREAS
OR HABITATES WILL BE DISTURBED OR AFFECTED.
Proposed measures to protect or conserve plants, animals, fish, or marine life are:
DOES NOT APPLY
3. How would the proposal be likely to deplete energy or natural resources?
NO
Proposed measures to protect or conserve energy and natural resources are:
DOES NOT APPLY
Revised on 4120110 Page 23 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
4. How would the proposal be likely to use or affect environmentally sensitive areas or areas designated (or eligible or
under study) for governmental protection; such as parks, wilderness, wild and scenic rivers, threatened or endangered
species habitat, historic or cultural sites, wetlands, floodplains, or prime farmlands?
DOES NOT APPLY
Proposed measures to protect such resources or to avoid or reduce impacts are:
DOES NOT APPLY
5. How would the proposal be likely to affect land and shoreline use, including whether it would allow or encourage land
or shoreline uses incompatible with existing plans?
ALL PROPOSED USES ARE ALLOWED UNDER CURRENT ZONING AND COMP -PLAN DESIGNATIONS
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce shoreline and land use impacts are:
DOES NOT APPLY
6. How would the proposal be likely to increase demands on transportation or public services and utilities?
LIKELY THE PROJECT WILL NOT INCREASE DEMAND ON THESE SURFACES AS THE SITE IS CURRENTLY
DEVELOPED WITH A RECREATIONAL USE AND WILL BE CHANGING TO RETAIL USE
7
Proposed measures to reduce or respond to such demand(s) are:
DOES NOT APPLY
Identify, if possible, whether the proposal may conflict with local, state, or federal laws or requirements for the
protection of the environment.
WE DO NOT BELIEVE THE PROPOSAL WOULD CONFLICT WITH LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL LAWS OR
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE ENVIRONMENT.
Revised on 4120110 Page 24 qf 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist