The URL can be used to link to this page

BLD20070161.pdf"1. 1 b STATUS: ISSUED 2/8/2007 Expiration Date: 2/8/2008 mgpii CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS,WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 Permit #: BLD20070161 Projecf Address _ 509 9TH AVE N, EDMONDSI Parcel No: 27032400220600 111ROPER'n'OWNER APPLICANT CONTRACTOR THUESEN ERIC CUSTOM HOMES ERIC THUESEN OWNER EXEMPTION TAKEN 18225 85TH PL W 18225 85TH PL W EDMONDS, WA 98020 Renewal of 20060032 VALUATION: $0 EDMONDS, WA 98020 425-772-9640 LICENSE 4: EXP: PERMIT TYPE: Residential PERMIT GROUP: 5 enewal' 'it1U ►v — GRADING: N CYDS: 0 TYPE OF CONSTRU- f10 : RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: N OCCUPANT GROUP: OCCUPANT LOAD: FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: OTHER: N ------- OTHER DESC: ZONE: NUMBER OF STORIES: 0 VESTED DATE: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 0 BASEMENT:0 1STFLOOR. 0 2ND FLOOR. 0 BASEMENT.0 1STFLOOR. 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 13RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 FRONTSMACK SIDESEI'BACK' S FMACK tEQUIRED: PROPOSED: REQUIRED: PROPOSED: REQUIRED: PROPOSED: iEIGHT ALLOWED:O PROPOSED:O REQUIRED: PROPOSED: :ET BACK NOTES: PER,Nirr APPROVAL 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOINGTHE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATINGTO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. . 'HIS APPLICATION ISNOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS(HER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID. Signature Print Name ATTENTION ITIS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL ORA CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/ IBC 10/ IRCI 10. ARCHIVE APPLICANT ASSESSOR OTHER BUILDING - Building Permit for 509 9th Ave. N., dated 2/8/07 STATUS: ISSUED BLD20070161 I CONDITIONS • Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. Sound/Noise originating fromtemporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt fromthe noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activites must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) CALL FOR INS PECTIONS BUILDING 425 771-0220 EXT. 1333 FNGEUE ING 425 771-0220 EXT. 1326 FIRE 425 771-0215 PUBLIC WORKS 425 771-0235 1 PR&TREATM©VT (425)672-5755 1 RECYCLING 425 275-4801 When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being requested, Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon. • B -Framing • B -Ceiling Insulation/Caulk • B-Sheetrock Nail • B -Building Final' eom o� a 1,6 1 (�, GD City of Edmonds Permit Application Form Form A Permit:Application for: ❑ New Sin& -.Family ❑ InteriorRemodel_❑.Garage/Carport 0, Fence-..: ❑ Gradings cyds. ❑ Tenant:lmprovementlChange of"Use ❑.Ro.ckery/Retaining. Wall ❑ Other°(Specify): Brief Description: CC". Op EDM 890 Site Address: SO!j g 4" AVE, 1`F . Suite # Sno County Tax Account Parcel #: P?4'A'7 032. 206©0 Business/Tenant Name (if applicable): G!KAZ - "'i' to EiSaQ PROPERTY OWNER: M Mailing Address: PL \% City: ac n1 ori QS State: kk)V\- Zip: Q G o2 r. Phone: 416IJ III q(p" FAX: (t�U) tai 0 -3�61 E-Mail:(_A,Ttswi5 %Z t-AmACa-s't' - Nei-, CONTRACTOR: Same as Property Owner 00ther.(Name) Mailing Address: City: Phone: ( ) State License Number: State: Zip: FAX: ( ) E -Mail: Exp: Date: City Business License No: APPLICANT/CONTACT: Same>as.Property Owner • ❑Same:as Contractor:.. OOther Fill out the following information if "Other". Name & Mailing Address: City: Phone: ( ) State: FAX: ( ) L:\TEMP\BUILDING\W EBchecklists\SFR.COMM.APP. doc9/21 /2006 E -Mail: PLUMBING FIXTURE COUNT Number Fixture Tvve L:\TEMP\DST's\FORMS\PLUMBFIX.xIs. 8-31-06 update Water Closet (Toilet) Sink (kitchen, laundry, bar, etc.) Lavatory Tub/Shower Dishwasher Hose Bib Water Heater Expansion Tank For Water Heater Floor Drain Pressure Reduction Valve Water Service Line Drinking Fountain Bidet/Urinal Clothes Washer Backflow Protection Device Hydronic Heat In Floor Wall Other GAS OUTLETS AC Unit BTUs Location Furnace BTUs Location Water Heater BTUs Location Boiler BTUs Location Dryer Stove/Range/Oven Fireplace/Insert BTUs Location Outdoor BBQ L:\TEMP\DST's\FORMS\PLUMBFIX.xIs. 8-31-06 update DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK Please provide a complete detailed written scope of work for the proposed project. Additions (additional square footage): Specify room use, floor level and square footage and direction if applicable (i.e. 545 square foot master bedroom/bathroom addition on the second floor with 140 square foot deck and 245 square foot kitchen addition on the main floor. South side of house). Remodels (interior renovations): Specify room uses and floor levels (i.e. combine bedrooms 1 and 2 on the main floor to create new master bedroom/bathroom; replace dining room sliding glass door with new French doors, reconfigure kitchen with new island prep counter and install new gas fireplace in the living room). L:\TEMP\BUILDING\WEBchecklists\SFR.COMM.APP.doc8/31/2006 3 EXEMPTION FROM CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION VERIFICATION FORM The undersigned property owner or contractor has applied for a building permit from. the City of Edmonds and claims that he/she/it are exempt from providing contractor registration in accordance with the provisions of RCW 18.27. The property owner, by their signature below hereby verifies to the City of Edmonds that: ❑ Value of work under $500.00. The aggregate contract price of labor and materials and all other items required for the project is less than $500.00 and is not part of a larger opertation to be undertaken on the property. The person employed to do this work has not advertised nor otherwise put himself forward to the permittee to be a contractor or qualified to engage in the business of a contract. RCW 18.27.090(9). ❑ Work performed personally on own property. The undersigned verifies that all work done under this permit will be done by the permittee personally on his/her own property and that the improvements constructed on the property are not being undertaken with the intention and purpose of selling the improved property. ❑ Commercial property exemption. The permittee is the owner of commercial property and the owner's own employees will perform all maintenance, repair and alteration work on the property. No work will be done by contract under the permit. RCW 18.27.090(13). ❑ Licensed architect, engineer, electrician or plumber. All work performed under this permit will be performed by an architect, civil or professional engineer, licensed electrician or licensed plumber operating within the scope of his or her license. RCW 18.27.090(14). c General Contractor. The owner is the General Contractor for the project and is required- to equiredto hire a minimum of two licensed subcontractors (unrelated building trades or crafts). The general contractor is responsible to verify all State licenses of subcontractor. RCW 18.27.010 THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNER HEREBY VERIFIES THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IF ANY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS FALSE, HE OR SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE IMMEDIATELY REVOKED AND ALL FEES PAID FORFEITED. Dated this Q day of , 20 E7, PROPERTY OWNER/PERMITTEE Signature Print LATEMPWILDINGTORMS\exemp contractor regis verif form.doc02/01/06 WITNESS /i/ Alg&,riol Print BLD20050140 - Umbaugh Page 1 of 1 BLD - Building Permit Ver: 1 #43ili D20050140 prop owner: ERIC THUESEN CUSTOM HOMES - status: REVISIONS - - address: 1509 9TH AVE N, EDMONDS post date: 2/9/2006 data screens: Select Screen... functions: Select Permit Function... i=$ -52 - Renewal MESSAGES AND ALERTS Type Expires By Posted Description { Theresa: The storm drainage drawings Eric submitted 11/2, reviewed, and comments emailed 11/28/06. The applicant i know, that all we are waiting for is for him re -delineate the u MESSAGE Chrisman 2/8/2007 area and buffer boundaries, as decreed per the court judge If the spreader trench as currently shown needs to be reloc have to redline the drawings that indicate the acceptable loi (outside the buffer area). http://edmondspmtweb/permittrax/PermitTraxMainlwfPermitConsoleMessageV iew. aspx?R... 2/9/2007 r T' n NOTICE TO PERMITTEE AND/OR OWNER DO NOT REMOVE 0 PARTIAL APPROVAL � CORRECTION REQUIRED � ENFORCEMENT VIIOL�-A7T-IO/N Ownerrl Ii ,� Permit Number Ian 011 O I lei -1 Job Address oq a , Site Contact WORK DESCRIBED BELOW HAS BEEN INSPECTED AND IS APPROVED ❑ APPROVED PLANS AND JOB CARD MUST BE AVAILABLE TO INSPECTOR ON SITE CORRECTIONS LISTED BELOW MUST BE MADE: BEFORE WORK CAN BE APPROVED AND/OR THE NEXT PHASE OF WORK IS STARTED RECALL FOR INSPECTION ❑ $50 REINSPECTION FEE MUST BE PAID PRIOR TO INSPECTION REQUEST ❑ STOP WORK -UNTIL AUTHORIZED TO CONTINUE BY CITY INSPECTOR ❑ NO PERMrr-STOP WORK -REMOVE CONSTRUCTION OR OBTAIN PERMIT AND MAKE WORK COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE CITY CODES THE ACTIONS OR CORRECTIONS INDICATED ABOVE ARE REQUIRED TO BE CORRECTED WITHIN CALENDAR DAYS OR PENALTIES MAY BE APPLIED. FOR INSPECTION CALL 425-771-0220 Building , ❑ Planning ❑ Engineering ❑ Fire ❑ Public Works White: Permit File Pink: Enforcement Buff: Applicant Permit Inspection Details Permit: BLD20070161 �. .;rRmf i, 1077 - E -Engineering Final Complete? Y 01/31/2008 Zulauf/sibrel 0 okay to final Y Total Time: 0 1158 - B -Building Final Complete? Y 01/29/2008 Readwin 30 APPROVED SUBJECT TO ENGINEERING FINAL. Y VERIFIED PERMANENT SHELVING IN OFFICE CLOSET. NO STOVE OR DISHWAHSER. Total Time: 30 3000 - B -All Building Inspections Covered Under 2005-0141 Complete? Y 01/29/2008 Readwin 0 Y Total Time: 0 Total Inspections: 3 Total Time: 30 10/21/2009 9:47:49 AM Page 1 of 1 DATE RECEIVED CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWN ESS fii LME0A USN �_bol MAILING ADDRESS IS -3-3-3 `30"i'LyU :w:m ZIP I TELEPHONE NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS ):1:'7 9 Qrr &YIW5 �Zo 1 STATE LICENSE NUMBER 6�R I I-rc14 964' PROPERTY T ACCOUNT PARC NO. aa7 a, ❑ NEW ❑ ADDITION pCl REMODEL `❑ REPAIR ❑ DEMOLISH ❑GARAGE CARPORT �to] t - TELE ONE' S-_76 EXPIRAT ON DAT C 3 L ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ❑ COMMERCIAL �-� COMPLIANCE OR • [PERMIT EXPIRES ❑ CHANGE OF ❑ MIXED USE /'� USE ❑ MULTIFAMILY NUMBER ❑ SIGN ❑ GRADING ❑ FENCE CYDS ( X ❑ TANK j Jt O IARAAA&61 WALLFIRE SPRIN(L R ❑RETAINING ROCKERY E]FIRFALARM OR AITIVITY) EXMIN NUMBER NUMBER OF OF DWELLING STORIES UNITS DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE D �-� SHORELINE OR ADB# • [PERMIT EXPIRES m PERMIT /'� REO'D COMPLETED EXEMPT NUMBER R IJIJ lY GROUP I CI YES ENO�ZONE JOB ADDRESS (�{` ^ tin— A S(11TE/APT# OCCUPANT SIGNAREA PLAT PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LOAD LID NO. 5 iti ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED City Surcharge ii` LID FEE $ 015t PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT')PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ED PROPOSED RW Permit Required Street Use Pemdt Required O FRONT URSIDE REAR EXISTING PROPOSED PF l0 25 Inspection Required e Engr. Review z Sidewalk Required 17 0Wiring ARKING REQUIRED DEDICATION FT PLANNING REVIEWED BY' GATEPROVIDED Underground required 0 METER SIZE �i�iW� ( I /ol{-/os LINE SIZE NO. OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED KSG �0. a✓ i5 NDT G "westan "AD V" -'I �tr1 t2�YY1pM' ori YES O NO O i Receipt # Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due wW Recording Fee CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) REMARKS I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATIONAPPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMFP ATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. Z DATE SIGNED OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE z z W ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY DATE FIRE REVIEWED BY DATE w LL rZwrdi✓19 4t IANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION SEPA m arnr OCCUPANT REO'D COMPLETED EXEMPT tt GROUP I CI YES ENO�ZONE SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT SIGNAREA HEIGHT I LOAD D 5 iti ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED City Surcharge ii` PLAN CHECK NO:43 015t IS1 T COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT')PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) ED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT URSIDE REAR THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Al is PF l0 25 N0 6ItAN bis - e Engr. Review z ARKING LOTAREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY' GATEPROVIDED Engr. Inspection 4503 �i�iW� ( I /ol{-/os 3 Fire Review KSG �0. a✓ i5 NDT G "westan "AD V" -'I �tr1 t2�YY1pM' ori rZwrdi✓19 4t 2,006 11-01 Ill TYPE OF CO T TION m arnr OCCUPANT 2 VALUATION le I GROUP 1/� ✓� SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT REQUIRED 13YES I FEE I LOAD 771-0220 RE ATTENTION EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110. 10/04 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIE 1116 - -FILE kYLLOW - INSPECTC OWNER OLD - ASSESSOR Mill ,yam Q z J GEOTECH REPORT BY: m arnr BYR L I • l i �i VALUATION le kxE F\ V� Description Plan Check FEE (` Description State Surcharge FEE HEAT SOURCE LOT SLOPE°h 'VESTED DATE Building'Permit ' q City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO:43 Plumbing Base Fee Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. Grading e Engr. Review PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5) PERMIT LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION Engr. Inspection 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Fire Review Plan Chk. Deposit Fire Inspection Receipt # Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due Recording Fee CALL FOR INSPECTION (425) Receipt # APPReL;5 This application is not a permit until signed by the Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and receipt is acknowledged in space provided. O ALS SIGNAT DATE A^ n 1 . r. 1 n I: _L j I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT 1 HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATIONAPPLICATION GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMFP ATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. SIG R O N R AGENT): DATE SIGNED 771-0220 RE ATTENTION EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110. 10/04 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIE 1116 - -FILE kYLLOW - INSPECTC OWNER OLD - ASSESSOR cf qt"L 00. NO low*6- t7 N �ArP�/�rf��i. �O�it��Di . 5?ArTEM�l�lr�lDi�, &k- )tpu 4f zws I 10,11111,+- E 163.5 jr05.0 (NO -T AW ieaW FtVVi MT A C -c c- 34 jr0i.7 �,Ooxc- Wcos. ,50V '."0 — -164.65 GuebT -665-00 /4 '- - r- ELI + 179-06 MM IZOO HOKTH to An cv V. 4d IVA 40 i HF MAXIMIJM5uLIANG ' i�:Fuoffif A 1!52.6 -6 165 .E vIA4A 149.9' ,, PLOTPLAN RECEIVED uu- Z*�PPROVED BY PLANNING DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTkqAU4*j w*/05- CITY OF EDMONDS v "4 l' Owner Plan Check # OS -4q3 Project Address S001 9 +11 Vvv-eQ • Date 1 W )05- Building Valuation & Fees deed bL'd USE AREA VALUE PER SQ. FT VALUATION More than 5 hour Charge $ $ SFR COM Base $ + #Pa es Basement Semi -Finished ADB Administrative Approval 69.30 $ Basement Unfinished $135 25.00 Other Garage/Carport 32.90/22.00 $ First Floor 92.40 $ Second Floor 92.40 $ Unheated/Storage 25.00 $ Deck 17.00 $ Unheated Sunroom 25.00 1 �� TOTAL VALUATION $ Plumbing FEES Base Fee $30 Permit Fee $ Fixtures x $10 Plan Check Fee $ Base Fee $85 State Surcharge $4.50 City Surcharge $15 Totat;Plumbin ; $ Investigation Fee ($205 min or double) $ Plumbing $ Mechanical,,. � � � � Mechanical $ Base -Fee, ' -_$30: Gradin /Yardage $ Total. Mechanical $ Total $ Fees Calculated b Checked b Planning Fees 1% Inspection Fee $65 minimum Bond Amount $ $ SEPA $420 up to 5 hours More than 5 hour Charge $ $ Recording fee Base $ + #Pa es $ ADB Administrative Approval $100 Critical Areas $135 $ Other Total $ Fees Calculated by: L:\TEMP\BUILDING\HANDOUT\fee sheet itemized form. doc06/3 0/05 Microfilmed / Engineering Fees Fire Fees Plan Review Fee ($50 per hour) Number of Hours $ Inspection Fee $50 x Number of Inspections $ Fire Connection $345 $ Total Fees Calculated by: Miscellaneous Description Department Total $ Total Fees Building COST X # OF INSPECTIONS Planning Storm Drainage Review SFR >5000 s .ft. $50 $ SFR Inspections $50x $ Commercial/MF Inspections 2.2% (Bond Amount $ $ Right of Way Base $160 + $15 Surcharge $ Right of Way Inspections $50x $170 Street Cut Fee Grand Total $ $ Water Meter Fee Size $ Water Connection Fee $ Side Sewer Connection Fee $ Side Sewer Permit Fee $30 SFR, $100 Com/MF) $ Alley Disruption Fee 111.000.000.344.110.000.000.00 Base $140 Parking Disruption Fee 111.000.000.344.120.000.000.00 Base $140 Sidewalk Disruption Fee 111.000.000.344.130.000.000.00 Base $140 Storm System Dv t. Charge New SFR 412.200.000.379.000.000.000.00 $428 Traffic Mitigation Fee ($840.72 SFR) $ Development Project Peer Review Fee $50 Plus Actual Cost In Lieu Sidewalk Fee LF $ Fee $ $ Other Total $ Fees Calculated by: Fire Fees Plan Review Fee ($50 per hour) Number of Hours $ Inspection Fee $50 x Number of Inspections $ Fire Connection $345 $ Total Fees Calculated by: Miscellaneous Description Department Total $ Total Fees Building $ Planning $ Engineering $ Fire $ Investigation Fee $ Miscellaneous $ 4` Review $170 5 Ih Review $170 6` Review $170 Grand Total $ L:\TEMP\BUILDING\HANDOUT\fee sheet itemized form.doc06/30/05 Microfilmed *� 0s' -4y 93 i �j bso 1 t7 -ws,c,�� l b e° IQ� wwtQ a /� PCU hS S� t 2) -to-E-A L- l 090. `? 7 *� 0s' -4y 93 m sl,a m 0 r- 0 0 O m T z -4 m co 0 O < z� vm C y 0 -- - e (2) 4050- Z O O = THUE5EN CUSTOM HOME5 )-a m m SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE m m C " m C O N sect >(q N 1 s cm a i� o C� ♦A `o fuuZ o cr, C -� r L" O (iS T C � I I r N m z rn Q) 1 7ti � 1 1 O 1 1 Cf� ' 1 1 'A �J, 1 �► 1 I m � 1 1 1 2 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 i C) I 1 1 1 I Gr I 1 1� � I� a • I�1 1 1 �• t • s m �sez m C O ry 0 s cm a i� o C� ♦A `o fuuZ o cr, C -� I 1 61 1 1 Z Z GQ I 1 1 1 t 5 L a I I 1 I I .p z Q 1 , 1 n 1 • 1 1 1 �► 1 I � 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 i I 1 1 1 I I O I 1 1� I� I�1 1 1 - 1 a C*i ^� w ° V �+ O O zy, cd O j b C. O D U cpm N V (Z4 O� > e�� C 4. C •C O r � p. �. > C Z C O O U O xw ) C S� cd o Cd cd c>, y U crs M. cd w U � U -d p Q. a� G cd O CO U U ' -d .� b > �. O O C W . Vi WO a Vj W= Z W Z W° h E'UyF'm�o� p U�Q Z v Z O h < o,z O nma3z�vSi>21x W� (� rn O CpL Q 0. (,,, z z< F C Q vyi W z W W p( W ZS O U vWiz C �zOz��W Q cc a, CJ NZ' W 'L Z V< W W 6 Z V cz fzJ 4zl oz�o3°at=°°Fx- b F F z � • • • CITY OF EDMONDS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220 ORDER TO CORRECT VIOLATION Location of Violation (Address and Tax Account Parcel No): 509 91h Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020 Tax Account Parcel No. 242703220600 Issued To: Eric Thuesen, Thuesen Custom Homes Address Of Person This Order Is Issued To: 18333 85th Place West, Edmonds, WA 98020 Code Section Violated:. International Residential Building Code sections 106, 108, 109. Description of Violation: Building Permit BLD2006-0032 expired on January 10, 2007 without first obtainingall ll required inspections. Corrective Action Required: Renew the permit by remitting fees of $349.00 plus any applicable City surcharge fees. Correction is Required no later than: 5:00pm (time) March 9, 2007 (date) If correction is not made by the date and time specified in the Order, a Notice of Civil Violation shall be issued. The Notice of Civil Violation shall assess fines of $100.00 per day, or portion of a day, during which the violation continues. Date Posted: Issuing Party Signature eannine L. Graf Date Mailed: February 21, 2007 Title Building Official 0t' I DATE RECEIVED r CITY OF EDMONDS CONSTRUCTION PERMIT APPLICATION OWN R f %E/NiME OBUSINESS Qe' Se N C�& r 1 -H on f 1� 11 CIr � MAILING ADDRESS I q ON ZIP TELEPHONE a 2 -b q2, - NAME tPPERMM IT PERMIT EXPIRESER - o��/v `- (\ S(11TEIAPT# 4\S NAME �y�� `AVt s•e�N C�xx�n PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. CBL# -700 ADDRESS rbISL 5 nITY U „ F,✓ C 2 TELEPHONE .1-r. &7b_3U STATE LICENSE NUMBER EXPIRAT ON DAT %3 C PROPERTYACCOUNT PARCEL NO. as o3a RW Permil Required Street Use Permit Required 0 EXISTING PROPOSED ❑ NEW RESIDENTIAL ❑ PLUMBING / MECH ADDITION COMMERCIAL ❑ COMPLIANCE OR.. 1:1❑ `,_,{ ❑ MIXED USE CH N id REMODEL ❑ MULTIFAMILY 1:1/�❑'� REPAIR / ❑ GRADING CYDS ❑ ( X ❑ DEMOLISH ❑ `TANK 10 OTH R jj£❑J ❑ CARPORT 1:1 RO KIE YGARAGE RETANING WALL FIRE ALLARM/L R (TYPE OF USE, BUSINF(SS OR ACTIVITY) EX MIN 1 NUMBER NUMBER OF OF DWELLING j STORIES UNITS a DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DONE �3O1 l Q_ PLAT NAME/SUBDIVISION NO. LOT NO. LID NO. SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION LID FEE $ PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY PER OFFICIAL STREET MAP TESCP Approved D 0 RW Permil Required Street Use Permit Required 0 EXISTING PROPOSED Inspection Required O CA 4 1;LM Sidewalk Required 13 REQUIRED DEDICATION FT Underground O BY. Wirinq required O METER SIZE LINE SIZE NO, OF FIXTURES PRV REQUIRED WAIVER O •' YES 0 NO 13 Z ALLOWED PROPOSED N t�1L STUDY ® d W REMARKS W OWNER/CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBLE FOR EROSION CONTROUDRAINAGE z a LOT COVERAGE z W ENGINEERING REVIEWED BY J ) nrtr=now= yt C9 LL IEY VARIANCE OR CU SHORELINE OR ADB# INSPECTION SEPA 9 REO'D COMPLETED EXEMPT CA 4 1;LM STR TUBAL I 0 YES M NO X BY. CA# �I fn ZONE SIGN AREA HEIGHT WAIVER O •' ALLOWED. PROPOSED ALLOWED PROPOSED N t�1L STUDY ® in/l DG" Or'�tc� ..�.. lr! LOT COVERAGE REQUIRED SETBACKS (FT.) PROPOSED SETBACKS (FT.) WED PROPOSED FRONT SIDE REAR FRONT UR SIDE REAR O Description •i. A: g •�• Z5 ID 25 NO UthN� z Plan Check 44` State Surcharge 17 !� PARKING LOTAREA PLANNING REVIEWED BY DATE g VESTED DATE REQ'D PROVIDED 4543 %X4% i 1 /o�F/o5" y 3 FT.) REMARKS �) tiara e, 15 NOT a 11 &Uest Rous✓ Building Permit nor ave pU„ -2 —1 City Surcharge r4&0rd1,V1a -W s,006 it al III PLAN CHECK NO: (� •,THIS Plumbing TYPE OF CON$T�t TION VGROUP 0 . OCCUPANT S SPECIAL INSPECTION CONSULTANT OCCUPANT REQUIRED E YES LOAD q_1 4' , j 771-0220 RE , ATTENTION EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110. 10/04 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIE 11M kL -FILE % YfLLOW - -OWNER "GOLD - A f a RFMARKS L Z00-57- C)9,/ 2- . 9 GEOTECH REPORT CA 4 1;LM STR TUBAL I �.�/V - t BY. LJ . G /f' "'' r jf:~T��-V' �l �l 1 J lVht� o tl.J'6 VALUATION N t�1L $ 2� VY0 in/l DG" Or'�tc� - ^ LV� 1 Description FEE Description FEE JIM!) Plan Check 44` State Surcharge 17 !� HEAT SOURCE LOT SLOPE% VESTED DATE (� Building Permit —1 City Surcharge PLAN CHECK NO: (� •,THIS Plumbing Base Fee S Mechanical THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. PERMIT COVERS WORK TO -BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBIC DONMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE Grading /� ul VeJ N-� / l vGY e Ll cl SEPARATE PERMISSION. Engr. Review PERMIT APPLICATION: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(5) PERMIT LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) Engr. Inspection SEE BACK OF PINK PERMIT FOR MORE INFORMATION 'APPLICANT, ON BEHALF OF HIS OR HER SPOUSE, HEIRS, ASSIGNS AND SUCCESSORS Fire Review ;Plan Chk. Deposit IN INTEREST, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, ITS OFFICIALS, EMPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND Fire Inspection Receipt # ALL CLAIMS FOR DAMAGES OF WHATEVER NATURE, ARISING DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT. ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT BE DEEMED TO MODIFY, WAIVE OR REDUCE ANY REQUIREMENT OF ANY CITY ORDINANCE Landscape Insp. Total Amt. Due 1 NOR LIMIT IN ANY WAY THE CITY'S ABILITY TO ENFORCE ANY ORDINANCE PROVISION.' Recording Fee Receipt # I HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT I HAVE READ THIS APPLICATION; THAT THE INFORMATION APPLICATION APPROVAL GIVEN IS CORRECT; AND THAT I AM THE OWNER, OR THE DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT OF THE OWNER. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUC- CALL This application is not a permit until signed by the TION; AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED Building Official or his/her Deputy: and Fees are paid, and IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO FOR INSPECTION receipt is acknowledged in space provided. WORKMEN'S COMP NSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. 0 DIALS SIGNATURE DATE SIGNAT�t RE (O NER,OR AGENT): DATE SIGNED (425) n /U /�� I i a I n 1. f' i. q_1 4' , j 771-0220 RE , ATTENTION EXT. 1333 IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTI- FICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109 / IBC110 / IRC110. 10/04 PRESS HARD - YOU ARE MAKING 4 COPIE 11M kL -FILE % YfLLOW - -OWNER "GOLD - A f a 0 RECORD OF INSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED e SETBACKS ..................... FOUNDATION: Footing ...................... Wall .......................... Pier/Porch ................. Retaining Wall ........... Slab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: Underground ............. Rough -In .............:..... Commercial Final ...... HEATING: Gas Test .................... Gas Piping ................. Equipment ................. Commercial Final ....... EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING ........................... FRAMING ........................ FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... INSULATION ................... Floor Insulation ......... Wall Insulation ........... Ceiling Insulation ....... SHEETROCK NAILING ... SPECIAL INSPECTION ... MISCELLANEOUS .......... FINAL APPROVAL FOR ti OCCUPANCY .................. ,` ' Y .. `OF I:.Ufl�r� CITY OFEDMONDS 121 5111 AVENUE NORI II I;DF10NDS;WA 980:0 I' 110Nl.:.(425) 77.1-11220 FA (425) 771,0221 ST-TUS: ISSUE, -D 9/$,.2.006�P,erm t'#,nBl D2�)0"b0890 ^r `� 8I'x�N=+Eyyp><rahonDate 9/8%2007. ct d'ddress•,509 9TA`AVENEDMONDS Ra rec l N o: 27032 3002201500 IUVIT0117111if MST, i - E40MES ERICTHULSENCUSTOM 110M1ES F'IOMEQWNE.'RA-S(51-N.ERA:1,CONTRACfOR - .. 18225 8,ST1'i RL W I F22$ 85TH PL W 18235 RSTI4 R:L SV EQMOND$. WA98020 EDhIONDB, WA 98020 EDMOND$, WA. 98020 x 425-670.1669 425.679-3¢69 .425-,67Q-3669 i LICENSE M: EN, F1i 1CLOSEEXIST INGCQVE3tEI) DLCk: WITH WRJDQW:S(UN-HEAT ARFA)WITH GAS IREPI ACT. 4 VALUATION: $1,600 PERMIT TYI'-C Residanital „ _ 1 GIs:AD,ING 4 `0'05'0 t I t, OCC0P. GROJP: It,) U.CCUI ANT LOAD. PERMIT TYI'-C Residanital „ _ 1'GRMIf CROUP 2 Addition GIs:AD,ING 4 `0'05'0 fYPE01'CONSfF;UCTION:VB ,v1,L Rtit IgLR•Y: N OCC0P. GROJP: It,) U.CCUI ANT LOAD. P, C, N (0 X 0.- QTNE 0N --; - QTN!jk DISC' $ONE RS 1.2 hUMBfROf STORIE5,.0 V4Sf.EDDATE; iA§rMCNT b ISP F_LOQ.R; 0 .. 2ND RI,Q.QR: 0, .' BASGMCNT. 0 1 Sf FLOOR: Q 2!NQ F4 qOR: 0 7 3RD FLOOR .0 GAItA�T 0` DECK: 0 OTHER' 0 3RD FLQOR; 0 GARAGE 0 DECK P. OTHCR 200 .. - RE • UIRSO' w FST 25' PROiPOSED +25' 11 1 Qi nfD' NORTH I0' PROPOSP,D' 20' RE 'U1'RFD' EAST 25 ROPOSEQ; 7' IIE-116111 KLLOWEV76 PPQPOSED.f) rOl l ED; SQUTI!I 10' PRQF PSL'.D 14' sET¢ACK N©TES': I,leighi.eiflcs/lot co' erap don't ;R,zop. Still meets setbacks. Detached garage is not pan AegO.Ory Dwelling.Unit _. .. . 1' I AGREE -TO COMPLYWITH CITY AND SiTkft LAw8 kEGUI.ATIN000NSfP.UCTION'ANQ IN DOING THF WO.It,K'AUTHPIiiIZF.Q THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL 13E GM'PLQYED.IN VIQLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF Thlr STATE OF WAS411NGrQN RELATINGTO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION IN$IPRA'NCGANP RCW 18;:7. TH,($APTLI A319N KNOT A PER111IIT UNTIL $KBILNFi LIAL OR I,I'IS/1ER DPPUTY AN'D ALI F.fSARE'PAID. , c fj L1 c c?Ft.�a (� sgnatureFp int Name . Date i An EiNTION ITIS Ut; I.AWFUL TO USE OR OCCUP I• A BUI( D. NG OR, S3RlIL.MRB UN Ill•, A FINAL INSC{,C`IION 1,1AS I3rHN StAD.E AND, \.PPROVAL QRp.CURlIFICAIL OF OCCUI'ANCa'IIAS a!- N^;Ri\N`IIiD.UDCION% IBCI 10'7 IRCI 10., y AR'CIIIVE ARF'J} AN]' ASSCSSOR a OlIi1H7i is • �t. i STATUS ISSU'F BLDZ0.06089,0. Nothing in this pemvt.approwal p;roges shall be, interpreted as allowing:gr pemtitting the rrraintenance ofany currently e,dsting illegal nonconforr'nin'g or un-penrutted building, structure, or site condltio,n which Is'out:slde the scope of the pq—T application, reg3rd•Icss ofwhelhersueh bulldtr,g,structure or.eondition g shown on'the itc Plan ordrawing Snch"building, struehlre orcondition rin}' be the subject ora separ.2te. en'forceir>cn't action Ary request for the rTwdification vgriance or•other admili s"tratrve devtatdon (her,eignfter "variance") nips:t be specifically called out and Identified. Approval of any plat or plan containing pro.visiiorrs which do not comply with City soda and,for wfiieh-a i variance has not been specifically Identified, requestand considered by th !appropriate Cry ofTi.1 in accordance with the �. appropHatc.proviS'ion of City gode.or $tate law does not approve any nerm'not to code spectficatron, T Sound/Noise onginating,fmmtemporar, construction sites as a resu'h ofco istruetlon achvl[y are a tt it fcomthe noise r^.riSs ( ofl1,CCChapter 5.30 -only during the hours o'f7:00amto 6:00pnron weekdays and 10, 0amand GOopmon Saturdays, excluding { Sundays and Federal Holidays.. At. all other tim;s the noise prginat'ing from construction s,rte$t3chvttg$,mustcornp.!y with the i mise limit's of Chapter 5.30, tin{ess a varlan.ee has bccn granted'pursuant to'LCC i THIS RERMT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTgD. THIS PERMIT "COVERS K'TO BE DONE QN PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONS TRUCnON�ON fidE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS. SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, 1-M ETES. ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERM $SIQN. PERMITTtkLIMIT: SEEECC)q 1:P:00.005(A)(6) _ S :y BUILDIiV6 (435) 771 020 EXT 1333 FT�INkl721NG 425) 771 0' 0"r 13'6. FIRE 45) 771 02'15 PUB�1G"."(SRKS(�2`')r710Z�5 YREIF�E�941FN1(425)67 3755 FtD YCIdfVC(425)275138C'i" &745 TestTipe RWranting ' f3=tileehanic I final •' RwBuilding Plna� I (J 1 _K I I S I I 1 Chit Permit apprp V, aj r *qm, i�l be qh q, allowing,or -y cur*" q vl' -n 1ng o,r.4n,ppern� tjp Or 01ra-MAg! i m4y. be the 8 gnt actlon." of whether such tion i's ihown on the structure or NORTH ct of a separate 22: q 5GALE: 1" = 29-0 10, L0 - V E r D. Oki YE-wo- A le %9 -Ao Py 4d REV Os, Vp AUG2 4.20h APPROVED V K A, N N!j NG-, Q CITY COPY 0 W22/2009 11:06:42 AM Page I of 1 q: C M --4 01 M 01 C > 0 n M C Q Z r 4 r 0 Permit Inspection Details Permit: BLD20060890 PER.'AIT-f'PA?� I f2 V BG iiT t/ 106,i, - 10102/2007 Readwin 20 DONE �ITH MAlr.SFR Total Tina: 20 71 Complete? 'Vy o" MI, 11/08/2006 Snook 25 APPROVED Yr Total Time: 25 1._15$ �3 Mechanical 10/02/2007 Readwin 20 APPROVED y Total Time: 20 10/02/2007 Readwin 20 APPROVED y Total Time: 20 Total Inspection3: 4 TiptAl Time: 95 0 W22/2009 11:06:42 AM Page I of 1 q: C M --4 01 M 01 C > 0 n M C Q Z r 4 r 0 ' �I;OAIE IiECF n ' • � _ ,.^, : .. �,� CT • j �). , PERMIT EkP'MES . ' QF ' T .. aDy4 11AODER , C( lSTFSUC IO�J P R'MIT »P44Cr�C1710N Nj I •1/ �1 p N. • 0 AAAIE/NAIiC Of IrUS NEtlB -- - - - - 111 4 / ` '' 4 1llk�S cm rN/ psutlDWItifO!1 NO LD1 ND lK) NO ' 'IF.VIINO A30RE9.8 ". •, ' l0 F,f4.1 ' �`tj OO 1 Y ."v PUbIIC I{IOIII OF WAY PER f7FfK•W, HTR[(T MAY Iny • fyy M.�rM CITY`- -.-IIP fFIL'PifONE. .. .. _ M,wr EFIS i1Nf7 ,- v1 PRO►QB °-"1'"•0"x~ {qj�M 11M I✓w1 AM T fMM�M 1 1 1L. 2 r^ j/+V, �.(l.� )_ �,/_ < (J Y'sOwrJ PCDUIRf0 OE41CA(K)N F; �,wyH 1✓.ly •.NAM¢ .. - .. .. - -. .. 4INW -.. - NO O /O(iVRIl$ PRV RfatImo V`Gvl ' Li.. 1 / Yf6 � 110 L1' . AD'OREBB".. - _. -..' :._, _. ... ,, .. .. .. ... -.... • REMARA9 .. ` .. - -OWNEN.COMTRACTOR Af!kf 10t! FOR EROSHON C,0!JIRGtMft MAOE ZIP' riELEPHONE Ee !t. NAME '... j{'. .':. G I I�L,A —'�. l..L,1 �'IC�M .. • .. E ECRIIIO REVI B_ - OAi• AODRE61 kwliN'EO BY ti DATE- . CTTY ' ' ZIP QM v+.►4 V, -,V\ TELLEPNONE- l ZS'(ol .? 0:•^I M'PNaF NUMBER - E%PIRA 1011'D SE� - f 1' Xyz LVAII.QOO SIGN An"PROPERTYTA% ACCOUNT PARCEL NO - Pi ALLOWED PROPOSED ALLOWfO PROPOSEDOO ' NEWR¢BIDEMvq, UMOINO t MECH ALIOWEO/ ►nOI(+OjSEU Nfo RNID SEMACKP iFT1 fRGNT� tROE RCAR �. raoPQnfg �It DACee IP,1 Ftq•Ii� LA1 ' ADDITION - ❑ L IOMMERGIAI COMPLUNC¢OR Q O OF - 3S:�/� wa. n0 15 /0�Y6 v� ` ( Qy Ty_ • �,. O REMODEL CHANO¢ 'AJ a MUlT1FA41LV 9fON _ PARANQ . • Rf60 D ' 10T AREA R 11' ,E - `- 3 1. O 'ORA 0 f, 0 : r - ` •' SENCE REPAIR IND CYD9 O I -K Pn O 0 OTHER - NENARNd ,/t .� •'„�. / 1 ' a t�T) 'K' OEMOU9N "K C�MAOE nETAiNIND WALL FIRE¢PRIN,w.ER PORT -'. P,(7CKE_'RY _ FRi AUnM ... `tTv _ , !t1 k ,E OF UB t"DU61NE99 0R ACTT- PIN . .' I.IIHE_,AEO BY 1'TPE OF ION C OCOVPA } .. 1 / CROUP, 3 O i NUIi'eR OF, NUTAeER or' DWELlWO carr dAL ��'77 AREAS /'11 SPE CIAIINS P C-TrON AREA L. �t y 91'DRIES VNITB NUMBER_ Ll// �I nEl1UN1E0 �. lUPANT' r„ h DESCRIBE WORK TO BE DOHfi - v PRMESS INSPEC110N5 PER UBC 106! 190101/ WC109 RP.ALMOFa 41 -N REO'D .P Eel 11 `) 1kilC c y . 1•. DescrtplJon r FEE DeWpl!t:n FEE G .. O� . fj* Ptan Check O Stale SUrcherge SOURCE' OIAlINO_ x --�� B LOT. SLOPE %- - - it,'I Building PoTmI1 :. 2 1 • . City, StxCnM)E v, i• i, PLAN CMECK NO. - ,, - r. - 1 - ; VESTED DAT .CL,) d_ Piumbkig 'Sage F O I{ 'i L . - _ .. Mechankal 1 iTl 1 THIS P&MIT AUYWOIYIT'ES ONLY THIS Wo@:L NOTED. THUS PCRMR COVERS WORK TO ` BE DONE. ON PRIVATE PROMRTY ONLY, ANY CDNSTRUCTION ON,THE PUBUC DOMAIN SIDEWALKS. DRIVEWAYS, MAR0UEE6, ETC.) WILL � (CURBS REOUIR[ > SFIAMTH PERYISSHON ' ._ .. .. .. - .. .- _ - � .. , .., .- Engr. AvAew �, ►EIIMR.APPt1CAT10N• 160 DAYS P[RYTT UMRI YE". PROVIDED WORK IS STARTED WYTMN ISO DAIS SEE BACK OF PMO( PERMR.FUR MORE INFORMATION � - Engf, InspeCtkgr:' �+ f'AI!!LHGIM, �. - r+f1e Review Plan Chk DBPOfil - Ln ON SEVILLE OF HIS OR HER 8?OWE HEtR9. ASSWN7 ANO SUCCEBORS TO AND THE CITY OF /' IN INT¢R-BT AOREf9 INDEMNIFY GEFEND HOLD MARMIESS 7f-fiOYONDa wASNB.GTON n6 O,h I(,419, EUPLOYEES, AND AGENTS FROM ANY AND -..• ..- . Fke Inspection Receipt N ALL'ClM1A9 FOR:DAMAOfi1 OF WMA NEA NATURE. AR191NG'DIRECTLY OR NOIRFCTLY - FROM THE ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT .tSBVANCE of THIS PERMIT SHALL NOT SE DEEM¢D TO AIOOIFY, WAPoE OR REANY RE"f:,MENT OF ANY.61TY ORDNANCE LnrTO,scepa InSp. ',TOlat Amt. Due !� = j O 1 NOR LIMIT IN-A;RY WAY THE CITY¢ ASKITY 70 ENFORCE ANY ORO�NANGE PROVISION' - - '• •, - ' I N Rec' 010 Fee Receipt M _ IU 11 I.HEREBY IHCKHOWLfDOE THAT I HAVE REAP" APPLICATION; YHAT THE INFORMATION ., ONFN M CORRECT, AND THAT I A4 THE OWNER OR THE OUL* MM40RIZED ADEM OF APPLICATION APPROVAL" W THE OWNER I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CrtY-AND STATE -LAWS RFOLUTIilO CONSTR,UG• TION; AND W DOING THEWORK AU )RIZED THEREBY PERSON WILL. BE EMPLCIYED CALL �� `�` b.M ��` isVS�~ &Warp OIScIYxfMAAw OFpRy, SRO r+ecM Fd.., c`110 L • I N0 IN VIOUTWN _ HE LABOR COOS Of T/1E STATE OF'WA9HINOTON REIATINO TD FOR,INSPECnON: i.e..411,F..4. Pgcati>o+y,Erowe.a. _ f fFco N WORKILEM� , lIgAT10W IN4Uf7ANCE AND PCW le ET. O) CMLS B TUBE TC iii _ f OII AGENT) DATC SIGNED (425, O o b o- 771-0220 I EAsiD B� A;E . 4 ,: ATTEN�`IN EXT 1333 I I , Z I - fTISUNIAWSUIT�IJ$E-OROCCVPYABIIILDINcgF;s1tt. TGREUNTILAFlNAI ` t Q IN$P.FCTIOEI .HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL; OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCJ= , ?RK . jffjL)C vEL> �j{ tvfuC, Z PANCNMAS�6ENGRANTED.1JBCtt)8;13( 11011R�1t FNNK:O}Y1IER . CQ4�•(3T.E350R Dom? FPRESS)JiARD.-YC ►AHE MAKING_ 4 COPIES' C --� m KTH 2a -O' 2W 10 hl IN A L z vA 0 nom zi 0 �4 Al• .0. Zone c bmer it Se ba Re it 'A 'N Sides0 Rot Rear M2, 0& Other P.L.OT PLM4 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHTS: MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGhT HPUS:E 0ETACHW MAGE; 1..52.A' E 1635 1 C_ , ac l 14,4.4! 149.91 1 ral .7, _C12,5 /4 -153.12 _R5_565 /4 -104.65' + 251 178.12 MAX 90OF -ELEV. + 15'. = 170.06 = %lAX ROOT tLIV.. 4 Irj. NX CA 9-K rel,.- W.- m V r6r-,4,x 4M �p It O Aft .4 I v ' � �p It O Aft .4 ' � Z �p It O Aft .4 Y O; f*I�11C�N k l i N: DIVS30CA i1"I DU IN AP I kY;rcid ��q�hO�,wl►]C �y4 -i�is'rt � � ,r +• v.n.`•%�r>q, 1:v^. I Sri vt F •� T tti - , �. Nilr • ``v + I.+ 'Ask �� ISS \r�' �,.3�'�` � t � , •\. ( \ 1 0'INS �.Vti r r N. _ .1 _.. Iti `. r `` }�.? ��( Co1 1'ouRS i 2.1'N'TEu4L,5 y C' ti [ ►.; y �4 N►�tawr APPRQV 5Y F?l.ANt 44I . trts spa /A it f E.• � }EXCISE TAX �:EauIRE Piled for Record at the RPuest Of• q:. . Thuesen Custom Homes [jn8 QANTIK SAIA"O county woo 17296 Talbot Road Edmonds, Washington 98026. I''Y COPS V • T . Notice of EasementMocRIL Grantors : Frederick A. WolgarrOtt and Judith S. Wolgamoit; husband and wife Grantee : Frederick A.. WolgamA and Judith S. W©lgamott, husband and wife Legal. Description: In S,E1/4, NNY 1L4.;ectton 24„Townsh'ip 27 North, Range_3 East, W.M. Asaessors Tax Parcel ID No. 21,032400220700 and 27032400220600 Nofi a is hereby given thatFredefilsk A. Wolgamott and Judith S. Wotgarnott, husband and wife,, owners of the following described prop 4f},, situate in the City of Edmonds, County of, Snohomish, State. of Was'.hington, to wit e PARCEL A The east 190 feet tot he "south 110 feet of the south half of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of thenorthwest quarter of S.e.Ftion 24, Township 27; North Range 3 East, W.M., Situate in the County of Snohomish,',�tate of Washington;, EXCEPT that. portion conveyed to•the City of Edmgnds per Superior Court Cause No. 1.04695. PARCEL. B r The south 11.0 feet of fho s q:qth half -of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of 5e,tioh 24, Township 27, Range 3 East, W.M., Situate in, the County of Snohomish State of Washington EXCEPT the east 190 feet thereof; and, EXCEPT the west 5.0. feet thereof conveyed tq.the City of Edr.nonds'for public road purposes by deed recorddd.dnder Recording Number 1.75663•,5, do hereby.reserve and convey until the present and.future owners, their heirs successors and assigns of the hereinabove described Parceb'B; a permanent gasemert for ingress and egress and thle installation and maimtenance of ublibes, ever,Vrjder, across., thf(ough and upon the north 15.feet.ofth..q Hereinabove desCnhed Parcel A. •Y . 4. f This irgtrum,ent shall be a rovenanttun,ning.with the land$ hereinabove des,oribed and is:bindin.g upon the +, owners of such lands, their heirs, s.uce�ssors and assigns, forever, ` .z i r I f IN WITNESS WHERE=OF we hereuntoset our hand's and seals this ., day of i • �' 2004. y .. 11 ` ,• r �4dck A. Woigamott Judrth S Wolgamo'tt I 1 State of Washington) ti`: t ,� i rj )ss ! County. of Snohomish) i I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Fredenck.A Wolgambtp' and Judith S W',Olgaitott, f � : husband and wife are the per pns w} o appeared before me and said ers • d aoknowied P Q. 991h'at+�ley rt gigned this ms:tr'urnent and acknowledged it to'be free and voluntary i 'act for the uses and purposes mentibied in this instrument. ' +. r I eiC C. R �ii1G '%, )tea✓l �� % PUBLIC x c 3' otary puhhc in and fr, a state o ��i dj ? �6 t a, z 1. 4 Washington 'residing' Ni.y appointment expires— `• ._ ) .k t is I Page 2.of.2 i i1 t i c�`Jy,e I GARY HAAKENSON x CITY OF EDMOND MAYOR 121,50d AVENUE NORTH. .EDfd.ONE1S, WA 9.8020 • (425,) 771.0220 FFM— (425) 771-0P21 Webci,gdmgndg.wa<us DEVE:LQPMENT URVICUS DEPARTMENT ,I p Planninc Building �ngineepng l �1�9. i1 Dccember 17, 2004 Enc Th'ue.s'en Custom Homes 18333 $3rd Pl W ; Edim,onds, WA 98026 ,. RE: Sidewalk Constru;ct�on ;t 509 9`" Ave N CITY COD j :.,.. Dear Erie: I'n resp.onse to your letter- of November 12t ?00.4, the City will not require you to. construct si.dewalles along rh.e'S`h Avenue N. frontage of the prQPerty at SQ9 S`h .i4 t N a$ a e©ndjition of your building pr- it approval. '. Sincerely, it D K' G'EBE..RT, PE City Engineer I P - �i n t` { 1 c: perini,t file street f e • l rKj;,o.rpo:roped A.uqus_t, 4 l , 189.0 .. •:A:.a; 4.;6:.;,1:. ^l.' ...�.��. .. 0 P - •% • l rKj;,o.rpo:roped A.uqus_t, 4 l , 189.0 .. •:A:.a; 4.;6:.;,1:. ^l.' ...�.��. .. 0 Date! D.e.cember 17,, 2004 To: Duane Cowman, Development Service Director Via: Rob Chave, Planning 'M@nager From: Dave Gebert, City Engineerl� Subject: Sidewalk Construction Wpi r for 509 90 Ave N The Cit h �s received a re lest from Eric Thuesen for a waiver fro � y q m sidewa;k congtrt ction requirements at 5.09 9th Five N, in.the letter dated November 12, This request pertains specificaNy. -to oonstruction of sid awal:ks on the property frontage along 8th Adie N. The requirement to ggnstruet sidewalks .has been reviewed in compliance, with the Edmonds Community Develo.p.ment Code (ECDC) and the 2002 Transportation Element as well as in. the benefit to the Citi! of Edmonds. Pursuant to ECDC 18.90:030; Table of Sidewalk Stzndprds, RS -152 zoning (which 5Q9 9' Ave Nis) does not require sidewalks., except as shown in the comprehensive Sidewalk Plain. It is., however, stated to be City pokey that sidewalks will be required on all streets over $00 feet in length (which Bch Ave N is, Neither the City Walkway Plan no,r.the Bikeway Comprehensive Plan indicate proposed projects at this location. The proposed development.is within 1;000 feet of existing sidewalks on 8th Me N However, portions of 8: Ave Nhave been vacated between the subject, property and the closest sidewalks on SO Ave N. Therefore, any sidewalks constructed at the property wquld be isolated from and not connecte-,d to any other sidewalks on 8th Ave N. This projeEt is within close prox. imity (within. 1000 feet,)-an.d on:.a street' leadi.,Mg to a public park/playfield. Mr. Thuesen argues that constru.ctic=n of sidewalks would be economically unfeasible due to special topographic circumstances (Le. grades, existing soils, 20 feet of existing fill). After visiting.the.9ite, I do not agree.that it is economically, unfeasible or physically impossible to corrWruct sidewalks. However, I do agree that it would be costly. In addition, I do not believe it is in the'beN interest of the City for the following reasons: 1. The property fronting o9.8th Ave N -.has a wetland very close to the 8th Ave N right-of-way. Construction of sidewalks would require construction very close to and possibly encroachment into the wetland. This is not desired b� the City. 2. 8 Ave N at this location is a short streteft of a very small, quiet, glow traffic road, isolated from the rest of 8th A.ve N by Vacated 3th Ave N right-of-way. 3. 8th Ave N at this location is only accessible via Daley -Street. This portion. of Daley Street has difficult topographic features (creek with steep banks) that would make sidewalk construction on Daley Street very costly and it is highly unlikely that the City will build sidewalks at this location on Daley Strget anytime ih t6e foreseeable ft tune. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a sidewalk constrL&d at.the subject property would ever connect to other City sidewalks. 4. Sidewalk construction is cleorly not consistent with the character of the surrounding neighborhood. While some of the criteria outlined in the 2002 Transportation Element would require sidewalks to be constructed at the project location, it has been . determined that it would not be in the City's best interest to install a sidewalk at this location. Therefore, it is recommended that the City waive the sidewalk construction polity requirement and not require construction of sidewalks along the frontage of the property at 509 91h Ave N, where it fronts along 8th Ave N, as a gondition of bailding permit approval. AP OVED: bu'0- ane Bowman Date - Development Services Director. q i C M. mD O n. o c: =m mz O� DZ �_ n� t_C . mm, o cw Zn r X D z i CO z O n M. j Nov 12, 2:004. , Enc Thuesen C HorneS 9833,3 83th PI. W. Edmonds., W'Ek. 96026 kA Mr. G,ebert 'Engineer City of Edmonds r Re: Plan check 04476 y ' t Mr. Gebert: z I am requesting a waiver for a s1dewalk at 509 8th Ave W. The site meets the condtions "o outlined in (E�.DC 1800:04.0) policy 3 2. 6. Special tapogaph cal circumstances exist within the nght of way that:erigke the contruciion of the sidewalk economically unfeasible. The •gradgll; and C n Axisting sgiis !20R of existing fill and a grade change of up to 5 ft. make construction both difficult and future settlement a sirong*ssibiiity. The nearest sidewalk that would be contigous to this one is on .6th find Daley. There isla access to this proposed sidewalk from Aloha. ( +tet c Please advise if you have any aestions. q Eric B. Thuesen * 4 425-870-3669 ph CCC 425-772-9401 cell 0-P \Ji j i I ri 2A�Ws 0..-14,1 fe cc�a.-. H 1�4:G SUS cp . ►{ Deoign Build 5ervice5, l nj c.oJS(2. �o� 3cb t EnglnCCHM,g & CQI15trUpt.,ibn M�n�a�Frn nt pnon:e rFax (360) 793 65) ' < 28119 • 12h 5t. 5.E., M®rroe, WA 5,$272 Pagcr,: (9'25) 359 ?a'62 4 i E=mail: r-heidc.q,characterlink.ne.t i l July 1.9, 2005 o . Eric Thuesen I t• Thueseri .Custom Homes 18333 85th. Place W Edmonds, WA 98020 �;,• 425) 67073669`a� s* F Subject: Thuesen - Added Man Door and Windows at Garage., Move Man door at Detached Garage l As requested I have cewiewed the lateral engineering for:this residence to accomrmodate;the ¢•.ove r changes. No change to the original shear walls are required. Hold-downs will haveto be adde..at the �? new man door in the house garage Qptional HTT22 hold-downs-can be substituted fet NpAHQ22 straps if the foundation is. already poured. �. l l Engineering and revised sumrn ry shreds are atlachEd I'f you have any further questi ,or h4bn be 1 of any further assistance pleas,, call meat the above nu.�nbers: <* i °s t'. wysyi� � '93 A eN � VI yw ,, . Cf'�TE4�� ON�1L w X1.15 ! Rick Heide, P:E.L- �. °•.f ' President 1 I Attachments BUILDING DEPAIRWEN7 dflY O,F EQMOND3: t• I'c'y COPY , ' i�JSWRn,N1.•d..a..,.t h-vyµ...n:Llifh•-MlV Y"r'<. .�.. ..< ...mow .. , .a ... .r - . .. .. .. .. . ea..a•M. :. .. a ..1 !'/"tl'^"'.,.,� { s_ I mow, ` • ! <�Y;a��y+ R. G-::, F2, Deslgn tD, Helcle, PE. Theusen 5 Residence 35 36) 793;8659 .601/04 M-A.In Floor Flan P 20' -Y2 Lj t -I '5 6 r - MI6 016 51-4 51e4 X1 X2 Lower Floor F-lj.n Full Plaight fqjmdatlon,*H -Y2 Srawl 5paec sheer well Nell All wall edges SI 3 around and yn-doiv. window6 ! g.1-4 yl —AILRAL& I Y, X.,l 6THCD14 ST24 �,Q �:�r>, y .. '..'� -.. r,;.; ..i• ... ..` .ice � ,. .. .. .•r•^r' y. RGP Design :R, D. Heide, P .E. Deslgn Build Services, Inc. 4/25 Theusen 5 Residence + Detached Garage .3&0) 193-9(059 8/11/04 Main'Floor Plan ti '• Scale I" = 20' 6' Hl9h FoundsLlon Wall 6I-6 IF Wall �. Y2 51-r? . r'" I 51-6 51-6 . Lf;?J' YI • XI X2 Upper Floor Plan Slrb 1.6 Y2 51-6 51-6 SI -6 BL KEC WALL REQUIREb 91-6 SI -b 51-E \ 1-6 ,-,,-Yl .Xl X2 t. . v c)r\p,RD p / p 934 0 S�ONAI EN \ 1AS/05 4 a.. ... �__�r � � ... .� �. ..w.. .•. YWro�....Y. '.. ..e t.. .♦ {: :-. iV.!.:.`1d.4.�a{'Y�iaz'�il.:.'1'0�.±� Vi•�tn •• .� �. � • •_�� .. • . _ .� ,•a •;. ti's, • ... r . � • I��v� -- , 4 r4, a e� �� p yn f t �•p t o f 70 Z w W�C�•c_Lk1,x , YX'2 R �° 2 Ch`a • �I • -i a.. ... �__�r � � ... .� �. ..w.. .•. YWro�....Y. '.. ..e t.. .♦ {: :-. iV.!.:.`1d.4.�a{'Y�iaz'�il.:.'1'0�.±� Vi•�tn A. BrUce Denn"is P.E. VB.A. Gqeqtech�n.ic�alj c"17 smin"'r Q Mr. & Mrs. W8.1-garn. ott 50.3 Ave, N Edmends, WA 98020 October 24., 2001 Q. O.P Y I SOILS FOI�NOA 7 -/PNS SITE DEVELOPMEN7 i tNSPEC71ON DRAINAGE , DESIGN PERIf LEGAL R.Q. Ppx 55502 Shoreline, ft-shington 98155 546a9211;7 FAX 546-844 =i 5i C M 0 ' T. C", I M C > zC C) -n rr, rn" Fn Q C 0)4"! Mo. ZA Z� 2. Z' Q,' M. Subject: Preliminary qqpticjinicaL-Evaluafion Wolga.mott Prolperty 503 !a"Ave. N, Edrrioddsf.-Waftngton This engineering report presents te results of prel:imi,nary geotechnicail evaluation of the Wolg%amott property located at 503 90* Ave. N, Edmonds*, Was.hinqton'. This evaluation was made at the request of jwners and real estate brokerDan , Tom. asiPk REFERENCES: • Property m, ap and stepe study by LSA dated May 23, 200 1 Site photographs RAC Kg- 8 OJU � N Q Itis* understood that the total overaj,ifQ'Foperty contains the existing WoigaM, Ott residence (5,03 VAve. N') as'well as ;I long, rectangular piec-q of pre.perty that nuns , westerly . down slope to 8th . Ave. N (see photographs)It is understood that the �6,xiisting ' residence Is to remain;: three (3) futUre single-family residence to be built Onxthe ly the future 3 ne Th , wer piece of property (containing W bower (westerly] property e lo _pe ate ly 4.QQ feet long. Cu residonces) is a P Xirm -lyl.10fbetwi.debyapproxi-m-atlz-w, p re. . , - this lower piece of property cd,?-i,taims a historic tennis court, smal [loon, crete acdess drive., and minor landscaping. The remainder of the,lower property contains mature trees, brush and grasses. Thp pt"mary geotechnJ�&.ra Vature affecting d. evelopm ent is slopes. The southeast corner of the lower properly contains a high point (elevation ap proxi!r0;-40-'Iy - th Thee weste m.- edge of the property (abutting 8' Ave. N) contains a low sp0,4 (approx-imatply elevation 93). I SOILS FOI�NOA 7 -/PNS SITE DEVELOPMEN7 i tNSPEC71ON DRAINAGE , DESIGN PERIf LEGAL R.Q. Ppx 55502 Shoreline, ft-shington 98155 546a9211;7 FAX 546-844 =i 5i C M 0 ' T. C", I M C > zC C) -n rr, rn" Fn Q C 0)4"! Mo. ZA Z� 2. Z' Q,' M. • Mr. 4.Mrs. Wol.,gamott Optober 24, 2001 Page 2 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION: This engineer pEvform ed. -an initial visual geotechnical evaluation of the property on August 18, 2001 and s bs e q'uent -t using nspection using a hand soil probe on September 27, 2001. • Visual evaluation of the propd . r -ti" revealed no evidence of any geotechnipa lt, O.spes.5:. no slides, no sloughing: no soil tension cracks nor any evidence idence of significant erosional degradation. It is understood that one new propds�d residence will occupy the portion of the prepert.y where the o.urrpnt tennis court exists. Thele.nni,s court reveals.mo evidence of any geotechnical distress. (other than years of non-use and slight slab cracking). Obviously, the tennis court area provides a relatively flat house location site. The use of a hand soil probe verified relative!y shallow (less than 18 inches) dense, sub grade soils. It is understood that the rem. arinj�rig,two future residences es will be accessed through the bottom (off 8 Ave—N.). Walking I exploring the lower portions of the property did yft!jN the toppgraph. ic map indications of less steep topography towards S'h Ave. N. The use. of a hand soil probe verified-1hP presenia of dense, native sub grade soils capable of providing a minimum of 2,000 p.§.f. bearing capacity. -CONCLUSIONS I RECOMMEN DAMNS:*: Based on the findings of this engineer's preliminary geotechnical evaluation and experience with nearby properties, the following are concluded and recommended; • The. proposed 3 future sitigle-family reside- .nces on the lower portion of the Wo,igam.* oft property are ge.q.t.e.chnii.c.atly viable. • ,-The sto, Oes present do not. pose adverse geotephnJcal impacts: tb the development of the proposed 3 houses. • Additional specific geotechnic-al 'nvestjqatiqns (test p,i,ts,. soil analysis, foundation. recommendations, etc.) - pre, required to proceed with development of the p rqpqsed 3 houses. I- This engineer ob;se.rved me adverse drainage or water conditions ng the preppse d development off' 3 new houses.. t. 4 o m m rn a' 0 '10C Am m mz.1 JO 0 -n -4 M M, 0 V) M 0 Z;' On; Z! W Ak 4. ` wir'a vvolg9o3rt' O.dtoj r24 2001, e Pa9: 2 PRELIMINARY EVALUATION: This engineer performed an initial visual geotechnical evaluation of the property on August 18, 2001 and subsequent inspection using a hand soil Probe on September 27', 20,01. Visual evaluation of the pro.peKS.revealed_no e- videneg of any geotechnical distress: no stidPs, no sloughing, no soil: tension cracks nor any evidence of significant erosional degradation. It is understood that one new proposed residence will occupy the portion of the property where the current tennis. court exists. The tennis court reveals no evidence of any geotechnical distress- (ether than yoars of non-use and slight slab (zracking);. Obviously, the tennis court area provides a relatively flat house Location site.- The use.nf-a hand soil probe verified relatively shallow (,less than 1. inches) dense, sub. grade soils. It is understood that the reffiaining two future residences will: be accessed through the bottom (.off 8"' Ave N). Walf� 1 e.xplornrtg the lower portions of the property did veil; , the tcpt�graphic map i • . oattons of less steep topography towards 8`h Ave. N. The use -of a hand. soil probe verified thepresence of dense, native sub grade soils capdble of previding a minimum of 2,000.b.s.f, bearing capacity. CONCLUSIONS ! IR LA fl.ENDATIONS: Based on tho findings of this engineer's preliminary geotechnical evaluation and experienee. with nearby properties, the following are concluded and recommended,: •The proposed 3'future singl`e�farnily residences on'the lower portion of the Welgamett property are aedteehnically ylable. • The slopes present do not pose adverse geotechnical impacts to the development;of the proposes 0 houses. • Additional specific geotechnical investigations (test pits, soil analysis.) foundation recommendations, etc.) are required to prooeed with development ofthe Oroposed 3 houses. • This engineer observed no -adverse drainage.orwater conditions precludirvig the proposed development of 4—pew houses. '�.� �hl� � Mrs 1rVglgar�o October4 2001 Page 3 If there are any g:uestion5, do not hesitate to call. DennisM. Bruce, P. E. j 'Geofkh, nicaj / Civil Engineer o D,MB•.abj .' . ', p' '•' r. C Yl { } } 7 v O: -� C. 31 z i 1 e 1 i C I • rWAIDAnONS S"FD,f✓EbOPM-=*r /NSPECPOANtt •ORA/%VAQE DES/GNd REMO,` LEGAf P:O.`Box 55502 Shoreline, WA 8fl55 (206).546.9217 FAX (206) 54th -84,,42 • • ;f' ` :.. P meV 54U 114.41 Q4 7�)t7c'3la MICR r Dentis M. Bruce, P E. ' - Geotechnical /Civil Engineer ca isb a Novetnber 12, 2004 "' O C _Gity of Edmonds• Home w c e Eric ThWesen Custom 1=3 85'h RL W. j�r Edmonds, WA 98026 lr_ ' Subject; Geotechnical Revww. = Site, Plan a Ave. North . Proposed New Residence 509 i Edmortft Washington Tfiis engineering re�,cxt presents the.resu�ts of a geotical review. of the property and site plan for the proposed new residence by Thuesen CUMOM !� Homes. h REFERENCES Prelirnin8ry geoted?nk;W reP°rt by D. Bnjcg, P.E. October 21, 2001 . • Soil teat pit photographs dated September 4,2 W2, • Site Flan for proposed for new residence by'Thuesen homes r %&C,,KGRQUN.D;c Y Tivs engineer has prmndec+i.gecatechnical services for potential, buY,ers and i developer -of the overall property t a03 GP:Ave. N. h R y: • 'fide soil test pits where duff on Septemt�er �l '2002 in the vicinit of the proposed. -new dome by Thuesen Custom Mvrnes, ? .. This engineer veritied very•dense native sands with gravels at shallow feeting depths.: PROPOSED NEW RESIDlNCEc This engineer has reviewed the attached sit plan by Thuesen;Gustom;. Homes for the new residence to be located in the "?Inas court' zone. 'The'tep ,),g'aphy for the slte has been performed � ! . A and,defines to", f -slope: Sea survey map. • rWAIDAnONS S"FD,f✓EbOPM-=*r /NSPECPOANtt •ORA/%VAQE DES/GNd REMO,` LEGAf P:O.`Box 55502 Shoreline, WA 8fl55 (206).546.9217 FAX (206) 54th -84,,42 • Dennis iM Bruce_, P E. January 11, 21005 s L7 City of. Edmonds - c/o Eric Thuesen Custom Homejs CITY COPY FEB 9 to 18333 85- h FI. W P.. ?005 R. Om WA 98025 FRti1/T DUN r' Subject: Geoiechnical and Drainage Evaluation — Design Criteria 509 Wh Ave. H, Edmonds,- Washington Proposed Two New Residences with Access This engineering report prtssents the. results of a geotechnical evaluation of the property at 509 9'h Ave. N, Edmonds, Wathington This evaluation was required due to ow4er / contractor concerns, as we'll as•C'iity Afi Edmonds requirements forsleep-slope development. REFERENCES: • Site Plan and Topographic purvey by LSA • Proposed Two New Residence a,nd Driveway Access Plans .(furnished by developer) • Preliminary Geotechnical evaluation by Q. Bruce, P.E. dated October 24, 2001 Site photographs SACKGRO-UND; The overall property at 5>j9 9th Ave. N (.formerly known as the Wolgamott property..) is approximately 110, feet wide (along 9"h. Ave. N), and approximately 5010 feet deep. The existing re -silence at 503 9'h Ave: N (the Wolgamott residence) is to remain. It is understood that property developer (Eric.Th:uesen) proposes to construct,two. .new singje-family residences down-slope (.westerly). of the existing residence.,Ocie •new residence will be constructed in the area currently occupied by the historic tennis ,co.urt. The other residence will be locate! westerly of the first residence. It ,$ unelerstood that dr#/@W@y acc?, s will be -from the north side of existing res.iden.ce and allow access to each of tbe-two new homes (see Project Plans): ASO/L FO(1N0.1 T/ONS SITE DEVELQIAM€NTINS'PEG.FION, • ?/7A/NA. GE ' DESLGN. d EI�MLT L66AL • i i. City of Edmonds c/o Eric Thuesen Custom Momes. Jpppyary 13, 2005. Page 2 r This engineer evaluated•tte overall property in 2001. Several prospective. developers have looked at the property since that time. r As stated in the October2.4,•20:01 preliminaryreport,, the primary geotechnical feature affecting development -are the slopes (see Topographic Map for specific slope declinations). t Visual observation dluring'72001 (as well as the past, 3-1/� years) has revealed r.o evidence of any geotechnical distress: no slides,, no sloughing, no soil tension cracks, -or any evidence of . ig ficant erosional degradation. This engineer under$tands that tlie'lowc.r portion of the over-all. property�(adjacent 8th Ave. N) has been designated a wetland zone (see Project Site Plan). EV,ALUATIOW In order to augment the existing' site geotechnical information., 2 soil test pits were dug by backhoe on Septemb&r 4,z20Q2. Recently, 4 soil test pits were d'uQ by hand in the sloped porti,pn of the property below proposed house No. 2. The recent test holes were dug to assess the viability of on-site storm water infiltration. The September 4, 2002 test pits were dug in the vicinity of House.No.1 (tennis court house) end revealed similar sub -grade conditions, namely. 0" to 6" Lawn, organics, roots, and organic silt 6" to 4' (bottom of pits) Very dense sands. with gravels No water was encountered in either of :these two test pits. All test pit walls remained vertical and stable. No sloughing or caving occurred. January. 2005 test holes on slope. Five test holes were hand dug to app.ruximately 3400t depths on the slope below proposed House N%. 2. The findings of all 5 test holes revealed similar sub- grade conditions, namely:, 0" to 6" Qrganics, roots, and forest duff 6" to 40" (bottom o9,h:o!a s) Dense ,sand,. Relatively clean with fine (soil passing No.. 200 sieve) a$,timated to be: less. than 10 percent ti.. (D Dity of Edmonds c/o Eric Thuelsen Custom. -Homes jan'u, ary 13, 20,05 Page 3 No -water was encountered in. any of the five test hples. All test hole walls remained vertical, and s.t#ble: No sloughing- or caving occurred. NOTE: See later section"o.n drainage for results of infiltri3tion test,. I COMCLUSIONS.1 RECOMMENDATIONS$psed. on the Bindings qf#Ji§ investigation, and-experie.npe with similar sites in 9' e,. N,'Ed'- monds, Wpphingtop is the area t.�q prooertv at�609 geoteoh.nically approved for the propbstd- 2 new residences., subject to the following: • Standard reinforced continuous and .soreadlootings. Aljowable bearitg pressure: 2,000 • 15qpivalent fluid prosiurie of 1 35 �p.cr.f. is re.c6,mmended-Jor any retaining wall designand verified by this engineer. provided dr inage zone is i.nspepte 'tor of 055 and passive pressure of 3,50- • For retaining walit'design, use friction fad P.C.f. • NOTE: It is under-sipod. that the dri'v�eway access will require a reinforced concrete retain I insupport Wall to s4 ortfqrthedriv0way. itis essential the retaining wall dense native 9 1. 'founda I tiqn be founded on ive sub�-grade soils - as Verified by geotechPica.1 inspeq'-tion';:. peotechnical'inspejions bf.'tbig.qngineerprior to any foundation concrete placement. The propozed structures can be Supported on conventional continWPPS and spTpad footings bparing qb undisturbR native soils or on structural fill placed above ., native sods. See the later sub -sectioStructural.Fill for entitled General Earthwork and. structural tfuptural fill . plaee Ment and compact -ion rddojmme6dq1iQns,. Continuous and An.: ividu.at d footings hove minimum y spread I 'should w 4of,eighteen(116),pd,twe-four(24) twenty-four inches, respectively, an, d,,,s,h,Ou, Id be bottom. vd at- least eighteen ,(18) inches below the lower adjacent finish grodbd surface. Depending. on the final site gr4des, some over -excavation may be required below footings to expose ie.omprotent native soils. Unless lean concrete is used to fill the over �least as wide excavated hole., the width of the over -excavation at the bottom must be 81, 5 the sum of two tirpes t I h e depto'of the over -excavation and the -footing. width For example, an over -excavation extending two. . feet I be , low the bottom of a -t0V,,qe4oq.twide footing must be at least e excavation. ,4ven feet wide at base of th City of Edmonds". do. Eric Thuesen Custom Homes January 13, 20Q5 Page 4 r Footings constructed according to the above recommendations may b1. e designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of two thousand (2,000) pounds per square 'foot {;p.s,f:) A one-third increase in this design bearing pressure may be used when considering short-term seism, wind or seisq.loads. For the above design criteria, it anticipated that total, post construction settlement of footings founded on competent, native soils (or on structural fill up to five (5.) feet in thiici,ness) will be about one-half inch, with differential settlements on the order of one-quarter inch. Lateral loads due to wind or seismic Torres may, be resisted by frietion.>between the fogndations and the bearing soils, or by passive earth pressure acting on the vertical; embedded portions of the foundations. For the. latter condition, the foundations must either be Poured d�ectly against undisturbed soil or the backfill placed around the outside of the foundation must be revel structural fill. We recommend the following e foundation's. resistance to lateral loading: design values be used for th Parameter Desiy�.n Value Cieffident of friction." 0` 0 . Passive Earth Pressure 3�D p,c.f, Where: ;• ( p.c.f. is pounds per cupic foot.• (,. Passive earth pressure is computed using Ithe equivalent fluid density. We recommend that a safety facto;- of at, least 1.5 be.Ajwd for design.of the foundation's resistance to lateral loading. SLABSQN. G_RAD.E: Slab on -grade floors may be supported on undisturbed, competent native soils ctr on sructurai fill. The slabs may be supported on the existing soils provided these soils can be re- compacted prior to placement of the free -draining sand or gravel undem th vel layer should be a minimum of four (4) inches thick. '� fe the slab. This.sand and gra y also recommend using a vapor barrier such as 6 mil. plastic rmembrane beneath the slab with minimum overlaps of 12 inches for sealing pJposes. Pt`RMANENT FOUNDATION AND RETAINING. WALLSc .. .. R Retaining wails backfilled on one side only should be designed to resist lateral; earth pressures unposed by the soils rQtained by these structures. The following tiR � City of Edmonds r c/o ,Erre Thuesen. Custom Homes January 13, 2005 Page 5- recommended design parameters are forwalls less than twelve (12) feet in height, which restrain level backfill: t Parameter Design: Value Active Earth Pressure` .5.p,.c.f. Passive Earth Pressure 350 p.c.f. Coef Tic iest of Friction 0.55 , Soil Unit Weight _; 125 p.c.f. Where (1) p.c.f is pounds per cubic foot (2) Active and passive earth pressures are computed using equivalent fluid densities,. For.restrained walls which cannot defect at least 0.002 times ahe wall height, a uniform latera!•`pres sure of one hundred (100 pa.f, should, be added to the active equivalent fluid pressure). The values given above are to be used for design of permanent foundation and retaining walls only An appropriate safety factor should be applied when designing the walls. We recommend using a safety factor of at least 1.5 for overturning and sliding. The above design values do not include the effects of any hydrostatic pressures behind the walls and assume that nosurcharge slopes or loads Hell be placed above the walls.- If these > < nditions exist, then those pressures should be added to the above lateral pressures. Also, if sloping backfll is desired behind the walls, then we will need. to be given the wall dimensions anal slops of the backfill in order to provide the. appropriate design earth pressures: Heavy construction equipment should not.be ope-.rated behind retaining and . foundation walls within a distance equal to the height of the wall; unless the walls are designed forAhe additional lateral pressures resulting from the equipment Rla ,ement and compaction of retaining wall backfill should b accomplished with hand-opeeated equipment. Retaining Wall Backfill Backfill placed within eighteen (18) inches of any retaining or foundation walls should be free drainingI structural fill containing no erga- nics, This backflishould contain no:more than live (5) percent silt orclay particles and have no particles greater tf. City of Edmonds eo z c Thuesen Custom Homes January 13, 2005 Page 6 ve four (4) ,inches in diameter. The percentage of particles passing to the h s'ilticontent,should bE between twenty-five (25) and seventy (70) percent. Du 9 the native soils are used as backfill, a drainage composite, such as Mirafi and Enkadrain, should be placed against the retaining walls. The drainage comp set es po of these should be hydraulically connected to the foundation drain system The pur backfill requirements is to assure that the design cetera for the retaining wall is not exceeded becawse of a build-up of hydrostatic,pressure behind the wall The subsection entitled General Earthwork and Structulal Fill contains recomrne- ndations regarding placement and compaction of structural fill behind retaining and foundation walls. EXCAVATION APID SLOPES: o case should excavation slopes be greater than the limits specifi In ned in local, state andnational government safety regulations, Temporary cuts up to a -height of four (4) feet deep in unsaturated Vils may be vert,cal. For temporaryGuts having a height greater than four (4) feet, the' cut-sh6dtd';have an inclination .no steeper than 1:1. (HorizgntalsVert�'cal) from the top of tFra. slops tV the bottom of the excavation Under specific recommendation's by the geotechnical engineer, excavation cuts may be rnod:ified for site conditions. All pormanent uts into native soils should be inclined no steeper than 2:1 (H:V). Fill slopes should n - t exceed 2H:1 V. It is 'important to note that sands do cave suddenly, anf wifl ut warning. The contractors should be made aware of this potential hazard. Water should not be allowed to flow uncontrolled over the top of any temporary or permanent slope. All permanently exposed slopes should be seeded with an appropriate species of vegetation to reduce erosion. and improve stability of the. surficial layer of ,soil. D_ RAiNAGE CONSIDERATIONS: ; Footing drains are recommended at the base of all footings and retaining walls, These drains should he surrounded by at least six Safi 14.ON nches fSupac 4NP, or s imiia=.rred rock wrapped in non -.woven geotextile filter fab c material). At the highest pointy he perforated pipe invert should be at least as low as the bottom of the footing and it should be sloped for drainage. All roof and surface water drains must be kept separate from the foundation drain system: No groundwater .was observed in the septernber 2002 test- pits or the January 2Q05 test holes. Seepage ,into the planned excavation is possiple, and bkely if, excavation occurs.during Hinter months, and if encountered should be drained away from the site by use of drain�g�ditches, perforated•pipe, French drains, or by.pwmping - -.7- 0, 7- i. City of Edmonds c/o Eric,. Thuesen Custom Homes 4,.an.uppy 1.3, 20,05 Page -7 from sumps interconnected by shallow con,nectorifenches at the bottom of the excavation. The excavation of the q;ite, s,,,h%uld be graded so that surface water is Off the s_itR and away from the tops of slopes, Water should not be allowed, to stand In ,any area where foundations, slabs, or pavements, are t be constructed. Any exposed slopes to be covered with plastic to inintm jzb.drosion. Final site grading in areas wa from the building. -,d Nt tebSt t'W'g (2) percent. a y fr ,a oipcent to buildings should be slope M. Jacerit to the building is paved. pt where the area a GENERAL E G L --ARTHWORK-AN.D--STRUC,.,TURA,,L..,FI,L.L:, The proposed building and ppvemer1f.arqas hepld- be stripped and cleared of al.1 surface vegetation, all organic matter, and oth -f' terious material. Thestrippedor removed materials should not.b mixed ural fill. e With any materials td be used as struc t i,11 is defined d under the building behind permanent Sz Axt-tiral f fined as arij fill pleipe retaining . g ce fowndation wplis, or in other aireas where, the underlying soils needsto support loads. This engineer should observe- site conditions during and after excavation prior to placement of any structural fill. All structural fill should bepl6ced in'ho _rizontal lifts with a moisture. dontent at or near the optimum moisture content. The optimuFmoisture content is that moisture compacted dry diansity. The mojs,1(.,ire �content of fill content which results in the greatest c-OmPP , �;Oilsl is very. im portarit and must be elosefy controlled ql�jring the fillingand compaction prlp"-$,S. 'd,onthe�materialtyp compoetion The allowable thickness �Q�f 4, of the Ill lift will depleri, -,e _ equip m ent, and the, number oT passes rr-ro e to ppmpa -t the lift. In no ease ,,shoulJO.. e lifts exceed twelve (12) inebeg in lop -3e thickness. The following table presents , recommended relative poin paction for structural fill: Location of Fill Placement Beneath. footings, slabs or wplkways Behind retaining walls Beneath pavements Minimum, . Relative Compaction 950/0 90% 9,,5% fe r upper 12 inches of Sub -rade, 9.0% below- that level City of Edmonds ' c/o Eric Thuesen Custom Homes January 13, 2005 w. ,A Page 8 Where: Minimum relative compaction is the ratio, expre sed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D-1557-78 (Modified Proctor). Use of On -Site Soils If grading activities take place during wet weather, or when the sandy, o� site soils are very wet, site preparation costs may be higher because of delays due to rains and the potential need to import granular fell. The on site soils are generally sandy and thus are not highly moisture sensitive: Grading operations will be difficult when the moisture content of these soils greatly exceeds the optimum moisture content. Moisture sensitive'Soi&wi,ll alsp be susceptible to excessive softening and "pumping" from construction equipment traffic h when the moisture content is greater tan tine optimum moisture contest. Ideally, structural fill, .Which is to fie placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more than five,( 1 5) percent silt or clay particles,. The pzrceritatpe of particles_ passing the No. 200 sieve should be measured from that.portion of the soil passing the three-quarter-ineh sieve. The use of "sortie" on-site soils for fill material rriav be acce l , ble if the upper red ornic in rials are se- gregated and moisture contents are, monitoby engineering inspections DRAINAGE CONTROLS: No drainage problems were evident with the existing residence and the ovotiaV. site. Surface runoff would flow westerly.following the topographic slope. However the^ extremely porous sub -grade sands allow for infiltration. , This engineer performed an on-site. infiltration test (complying with King C,ouI,ty Surface Water Drainage Manual Standard methodology). The 5 hand dug test hotel were filled with water during saturated winter conditions. AIL 5 test holes grained very, quickly at maximum infiltration rates. This maximum infiltration (greater than 24 inches in 2U,rrirnutes) is expected 4ue to the presemm relatively clean sands. Desi.gn.lnfiltr$ion Rate: 1.5 inches per.hour City of Edmonds e/o Eric Thuesen Custom Homes. January 1.3, 2005 Page 9 This engineer recornmend.5 using 15 inches per hour as a design infiltration rate in conjunction with storm water control for the two proposed houses. . Use standard infiltration trench,.designs attached. Geotechnica ins; ections req hived during installation of infiltration trenches. CONCRETE: Allfoundation cgn�,reie ('footings; 's-terrt ,walls-, slabs, any retainrng'walls;, etc.), shall have a rnin! rmurn cer►ent content of 5-1f2.sacks per cubic.yard of concrete mix. DRIVEWAY ZONE.:- RETAINING WALL:, As stated, the driveway access will require a ro'inforced concrete wall and subsequent fill material. I:t is essential that base oi'drivpway retaining wall be founded in dense, native sub -grade soils -As verified by geotechnical inspections. Addtiona,ly, proper placement,of approveftfl,l rndtetial.re-quires inspections. SLOPES- SETBACKS /,B;UFFERS:• There are no geotechnical•conditions limiting or restricting the location .of the two new resideneet. The area proposed for infiltration is stable bnd will accommodate infiltration trenches designed in accordance with the criteria herein. 9_nMONDS STEEP SLOPE EXEMPTION,: The following iters re -spend to City of Edmonds steep slope exemptiori criteria. • The site will be stable fo`.tlowing the permitted activity provided geotechnical inspections verify the recommendations in this report. • The proposed development will oecur on steep slope areas that qualify, as adv"ance_ outwash in accordance with the geglogica9 map of the Edmonds east. And part of the Edmonds west quadrangles by James. P. Minnard. Fill. material: Neither of the proposed 2 new residences will require fill. H January 13;, 200:5 Page 10 The access driveway will require a reinforced concrete retaining wall and approved structural fill. It is understood th,* thio engineer will, performon-site geotechnical inspections to ver—ifY proper placement of approved fill materials. None of the following conditions exist on the steep slope area: impermeable soils anter -bedded with granular soils., springs or groundwater seepage, sigrnfic-ant visible evidence ©f groundwater seepage, previous land sliding or instability, or ,nd slide deposits. xistin , la . e _ 9 ,. • ' vial soils or soils debris' weathered soils, W�lu ess of organics, �, I . . The thickn .� feet. an 3 ss than exh h, itimg loose conditions on oratJjacent to the steep slope are le 41 All excavations on the steep slopes will not extend below -a 35 degree plane ,' • extended down frorm the property line, ,j. I All retaining structures on steep slopes, shall•be engineered structures conforming to the State Building Code- and subject to on-site geotechnical inspections by this engineer. N;o rockeri'es greater than 4 feet in height are proposed. • • An undisturbed buffer of 15 feat shall be maintained from the proposed develo,pment to adjacent residential properties. . The proposed development (2 new residences and, access driveway) will not decrease the stability any adjacent property, subject to on-site geotechnical inspections by this engineea INSPECTfONS: The recommendations of to"is report are o y valid when key geotechnical as a ;s are inspected by this emQlnaer durin,Q co structidn: I' . Soil cuts Foundation sub -grade verification r' Retaining wall, or ,rockery placement Any fill placement Subsurface drainage in stallaii'on ,i Infiltratign trencti placement F . Tefipprary and final erosion ontrol. ,i l I z 0' {. M. T v M'. c mv; i o Cttx,:.; xm. M Z , X10 C > Z. n tcrn::, m,�'' 70 D 1. zil..v CD Z1. M* 4 , City of Edmonds c/o Eric, Thuesen Custprn Homes januwy 13., 2005 Page 11 SUMMARY: deneieq..'and access at 509 9th Ave. N, The proposed 2 new resi. �� Edmonds, Washington are gepteehnit-.41,ly viable when constructed inaccordance with the recommendations herein, c-Prii,p4anco with Cityof Edmonds approved plans anl. requirements, and key geoteQ11r$4Pconstruction. inspections during const u ion. GEDTIECHNICAL REVIEW OF F,101L PLANgi. At the time of this investigation and report, final house plans were i7ot available for review. As$tated n this report, Eric Thye§qn proposes to construct 2 new residencqs in accordance with the Site Plan with a north side a P si. s driveway. The dense native sands allow for standardfoundation construction in accordance with the recommendations of this repqrt.. Additionally, the native sands allow for storm- water infiltration West of the second house, subject to inspections, Prior to final permit issuance, this engvineelr should review the final house plans to c this report. compliance with the recommendations of th Upon satisfactory review, a "Statement OfMnimal Risk" will be I sued. The findings and recommendations of this report were prepared in accordance -principles a d pract ce. No, other with .generally acpapted profe-sslona+ e ngineering n the resuits The con-clus.ions are based on Warranty, either express or implied, is made of the field exploration andinterpolation of subsurf-ape conditions between explored lopptions, If conditions are encountered 0 tered during construction that appear to be different engineer should be notified to'obstrve the - described in this report, this e than those situation and ,review and verify or modify the recommendations. WAS If there are a . ny questiomi, do not hesitate to call. 54 t`17403 Dennis M, $ruce, P.E. A 4, 6eotechnic-al 1 Civil Engineer e6. 02 05.1:0.50a D. Bruce.; R.E.• 206-546-8442 p.1 Dennis IVL, Bruce, P;L. rA,/N l3 aoos- 0! IT E., Mf w. A. Geotechnical/Ciutl £nginc.r 4 S TEs-rocFsuc� To 3g C L F�F K,� To Su4-V--h:C.tF ,flR/�'l N PrGE r IikOUR.I ,..� -r,fC FVIb I- C . W �\ 1s " RA,P(D D;uE; "To SikNb ° Tins N. REeo µ ew ts A Rk-TE +Kj�l is o� S T . to Fl L:TR.hTlO'u d Vis;! 6N �/t'L.Tl�til�l) S_Q/LS FOUNC29-Ti/O+VS 5frF QEVELCY'MENT',• INSPECT/©N •QFLVNICjE • OES!GNd P.fRM/'F (EY'viG P•.©. Box 555Q2 Shojelin.ok WA 901;55 .(?ACS,) 546 92.1'9 • FAX' (206)546-&142 Where .Minimum relatiy.e'cornpaction is,the ratio expressed in percentages, of the compacted dry density to the'maximum dry density, as determined in accordance with'A$TM Test Q,es.ignation D 1557-78 (lvlodified Proctor;): Use of On-Site Soils If grading activiba.: take Place during wet weRther, or when the sandy, on site soils are vary, wet, site pre paratipn costs may pe higher because of dRl'ays due to rains amd the.p©lential need to import granular fill. The ori site soils are generally Bondy and thin are pat highly moisture sensitive. Grading operations,will be diffirrultwhen the . nor'sture content of these .oils greitly exceeds the optimum moisturg content. Moisture sensitive soils will also be susceptible to excessive softening, end f Ilpumping� from construction equipment ' raffic where the moisture content is greatet than the optimum moisture content.f Ideally, structural .fill which is to tie placed in wet weather, should consist of a granular soil having no more th�►n five (5•) percent silt or clay particles: The percentage of particles pas„s'ing the No 200 sieve should be measured from that-portlo.n of the sail, passing the thrare-guarter inch sieve. kl i The use of some” on site soils for fill inaterial may be.acceptable if the uppe^ l organic materials are s@.qregated and moisture contents are monitored by enginegrimg ' inspegt'ion. f DRAINAGE C f.,NTROLS: No draihage pro .Ipyps were evident witfrr.the existing residence amd the overall site, Surface runoff weld flow. westerly following the t©pogrd,phic slope However, the eagtremely porous sub sands allow for infiltration. f This engm ineer perfored an onsite infiltration, test (eo;,mplying•.wi1h King Cou,nty Surf- cO ? VN-alterDrainage Manual' standard methodology). The 5 hand dug test hol,Es. were filled with water during s tur-ated�w_inter conditions. All 5 test holes 0 very g,wickly.at maximum infiltration'rbtia. t This maximums in:filtraGon {greater than 24 inches in 2:0.minutes) is exPLcted, d;ue to tie presence relatively cleat? sands. Design lofiltratio'n Rate: 15 inches per hour 1 '; n � �' `� j}',�1Fr .- ��tk�.� w'$ �` �•I�i� � `"r `�"��.: �" 5 "�� i. �Mr��: .'• �.a ta.�:. a , : , •�* .� RKlt Q2 ,R? �p.7 Sri 9. pr a*. 1 .� Milk NR t,7 7t j.17i�'�,1 `7, 7 a t. Y 71i 73 KT f y 1 1A +n. �t Ic; ri C Fy V ' i Iy i •r�' / i 6 � • , V it I I jz I 11 TT` I � '... '. _ .. .. _.-.-.......-.-.........-.. ...' __.. ... .,.......,...r..r. .rwww...aa •.`.•n .- 1 �.. -...�—...�.—..—...—...."�...*wYM,�,�n/-wner,+SnwW' j Z. 4' y �5 OJ• 14e Q. ➢rune, f'. E. i 54t;-044,,2 P, . C ? 3 [v)TLT1Lt71QN Ff7tENCt1} S AND Vu LS IGU7tE 2 B T y"M-44 DOW' NSM7 INFILTRA'P1O19 SYSTkM v root �,IJ l4''T � kTtoa 1 V S Ed L I N F(r,l I✓ "r dean L Crs 1 �) QOC� 4' rigid or 6° ftexibl''e A�+' pc±rfq ated.pipe t I�1�?�{�vloU,S Sv�� ,nfiltraeon trench .f F s sump w/solidlid PLAN VIEW NTS _ I _,; roofdrafi f .: ( prk pr.l Lir tr TiIR>✓ O� Ctf E.s .%fC:sS/1 P'Y .. { M 41.i • l0 4. overflow rigid ors" eex)ble perforated pipe 4pfash block - oppe.Q i � .. • 4 + washed. rode fine mesh screen�— CO 'sump w%solid lid i Pr WILE VIEW {� filter fabric.:.. compacted backfill -- w LAIP-Wh- — perforated pipe Q- c• 7 • �o' oo o Q� Fop uv v' washed.ro�k i : oQOpoopop� 11%2',3[9" MICROFILM Dennis M: Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil.Engi=neer RECEIVED February 18, 2005 FEB 2 3 2005 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Ave. N. PERMIT COUNTER Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Field Reports — Geortechnical Inspections 509 9t'' Ave. N. - Thuesen New Homes This engineering report presents the resdlts of ongoing geotechnical inspections for the two new. residences and access driveway at 509 9�'' Ave. N. Edmonds, INA. These inspections are required by the- City of Edmonds in conjunction with the permit agreement. i REFERENCES: • Geotechnical reports by 0. Bruce P.E. • City of Edmonds approved project plans • Site photographs 10PECTION.S: This engineer provides daily onsite inspections during periods of active grading and foundation work, • Excavation: Contractor began excavation in I'ate January, 2005. Excavation encountered the�'densd native sub -grade sands, as' anticipated by the geotechnical report. Excavation occwrred on the north side of the existing residence to create the access drive and retaining walls. All excavation stabie. • Sub -grade Verification: This engineer verified dense native sands easily, providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. "OK" to proceed with foundation form work, reinforcing steel, and concrete in accordance with approved plans and inspections, • Slope Stability: Overall slope has not been impacted by the excavation and foundation work to date.. All �,iopes are sta hle. I • solLS • FouNoA. r1oNs + S/TEQEVE•LC7E•MENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DE'SYGN& PERM/T • LEGAL, • P. D. Box 55502 • S ioreline, WA 98155 (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 z O 0 M -4-n vm MO �O OC sM mm Z o-4 DZ r= O� n i� mm_ C- 1) r- 0 cmi� k Z D s z x CD z 0 i 0 M y MICROFILM Dennis M: Bruce, P.E. M.S.C.E., M.B.A. Geotechnical/Civil.Engi=neer RECEIVED February 18, 2005 FEB 2 3 2005 City of Edmonds 121 Fifth Ave. N. PERMIT COUNTER Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Field Reports — Geortechnical Inspections 509 9t'' Ave. N. - Thuesen New Homes This engineering report presents the resdlts of ongoing geotechnical inspections for the two new. residences and access driveway at 509 9�'' Ave. N. Edmonds, INA. These inspections are required by the- City of Edmonds in conjunction with the permit agreement. i REFERENCES: • Geotechnical reports by 0. Bruce P.E. • City of Edmonds approved project plans • Site photographs 10PECTION.S: This engineer provides daily onsite inspections during periods of active grading and foundation work, • Excavation: Contractor began excavation in I'ate January, 2005. Excavation encountered the�'densd native sub -grade sands, as' anticipated by the geotechnical report. Excavation occwrred on the north side of the existing residence to create the access drive and retaining walls. All excavation stabie. • Sub -grade Verification: This engineer verified dense native sands easily, providing 2,000 p.s.f. bearing capacity. "OK" to proceed with foundation form work, reinforcing steel, and concrete in accordance with approved plans and inspections, • Slope Stability: Overall slope has not been impacted by the excavation and foundation work to date.. All �,iopes are sta hle. I • solLS • FouNoA. r1oNs + S/TEQEVE•LC7E•MENT • INSPECTION • DRAINAGE • DE'SYGN& PERM/T • LEGAL, • P. D. Box 55502 • S ioreline, WA 98155 (206) 546-9217 • FAX (206) 546-8442 z O 0 M -4-n vm MO �O OC sM mm Z o-4 DZ r= O� n i� mm_ C- 1) r- 0 cmi� k Z D s z x CD z 0 i 0 M City of Edmonds February 18, 200.5 Page 2 of 2 • Rockery Placement: Not yet • Sub surface Drainage: Not yet Infiltration Trench.Pl:aceme-rit; Not yet • Tem .ora. Asion _ .ontrol Measures; Contractor p[operly, established a D ry rocked construction entrant& off Ave. N See photographs. Additionally contractor placed silfatl&n fencing in down, sloPe portions of th4p property. All tempora= ry erosion control measures are approved through this date .(February 10'2006.)- * ` I U MARY: • Geotechnical aspects are proceeding with•inspections,by this engineer. All aspects completed to date (February 18, 2005.) are approved • Geotechnical. inspections ,pn.go'in:g Temporary erosion control measures are "approved through this date (February 18, 2005,. j If there are any questions,, please do not hesitate to call 47 44. y M � •- � 17405 d` b� _ ; • �s%UNAL E�G,. Ezsea 1?!I� s Dennis M Bruce P E. Geotechnical / Civil Engrn; Frit Thue'sen Custom Ho,rnes 18.x:3;3 @V' Pt W. F Edmonds, WA 08026 S' t. DMB: Imb s =+ -n C m m o =m M 6 DZ -C to o� MK m O r - 0m c cn Kco mn Zr -+ m ➢Z. 2 0 c m ROFILM. Dennis M. Bruce, P.E. M C,L., R/LB.A.eotech.nical/Civ.il Engineer ' R:ECEIV ' Lune i, 2Qo.f JUN 0 3 IIS '. City of Edmonds. PEII— !T CauNTER - 121 5a' Ave. N. Edmonds, WA 98Q,2,t' ` ub�ect, Field Reports,?:,special CeotechnieAf Inspections, 50;9 9" Ave. N. Tht;esen 2 hlew Residences ' This eng�neering.report preseijt� t}�e res_ults ofongoing,geotechn cal inspecfio;ns for the 2 1 new residences at 509 9``' Ave. N., Edmonds, WA. REFERENCES: ,> , ` • Geotechnical and inskcction-gP.orts=b,y.D. Bruce, PE.. • City of Zdmonds approved prj)ect plans • Photographs LNSPECTI.ON: -a This engineer continues to per daily onsite inspections during per ods of active grad�:ng, foundation, and geotechnic"a1 work. t • Excavation for Wo.sterly House: Excavations encountered the dense native sub- grade sands as anticipated by the geotechnicaj report. All excav non is st_ ble th-ough this date(dune 1, ti0Q5). • Sub -grade Verif cation:, This engineer verrf ed. dense, native sa^�1 providing2;OQQ p•sf bearing capa.city for the westerl house. "OK" to'proeeed with foundation forreinfording steel, and concrete . glace,rnent in accordance with approved plans and this engineer,'otechnica.l inspections, c • Slope NO adverse impacts have affected the slope o.n the Thuesen property; No adverse impact to adjacent slopes. All slopes (Thuesen and adjacent) are stable through this date (junP 1, 20Q5). :;y •. Rockery Placement NOL yet. I!(! 'IMSRCIQ, V /!, RM4 ALO/LS F&UVQA7/ONS. $/7EQ V LOP� NT /� F P.O. Bcc 5S5"Q2 -horelin@, WA 991,55 (906), X46,9 17 FAX (20;60 54QQ.4.4a City pf Edmonds June l 20.O5 Fuge 7 of • Subsurface Drainage: Not yet. o Infiltration Fence: Not yet. • Temporary Frosion Control Measures: '"o,-itractor (Eric Th -sen) Continues to p,ro,petty maintai.nthe rocked construeti.on entrance o.ff0 Ave. N., it well as siltation fencing and diligent projeci clean. up. A.1 temporary erosion "I measures are approved through this date 7005): SU:MM.A.RYa • Ongoing geotechnical inspections have verified proper cornpl:iance with project plans and good geotechnical practices. All completed aspects through this date. (:Twine 1, 2005) are approved. "OK" to proceed with foundation placement for the westerly house, • Oeoteehnica_I inspections are, on IItg. If there aye any questions, do not hesitate to call. res M B . q , ilk IM G Dennis M $'rued, �arhs,' ..,eotechnical / Civil.) i.neer QMB;jpb . !ff Height Calculation Workshect Address: S �r}�,� Date: Iy Inspoctor(s) �!►'�� .�R 1. Datum Point: U• - I Datum Point Elevation: ( lc °�y 3. Average Grader �3 h'Z. 4.. Maximum Elevation Allowed: l S •�Z(average, grade) + 5. Reference Point Elevation Shot to House: ' fiU C5..6 (datum a{evation) + 7Z. (grade to.transit level line shot to house) = 6. Measurements from line shot onto house to f ofY dge: ` Total 7. Actual Elevation?�kA l (referen,ce.point elevation,)+ S� �Y (measurements from, a124.. Con pfusion: v �.' (actual) is greater ess a l � 51 I Z (allowed); -therefore the:hovse is not ov the height r-equireme NEC 1t.203Q requirements, A , - p CI' ' VOF EDMONI?,S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTM NT 121 5th Avenue North,.Edmonds WA98 Q70 . (425) 771-02,20 Location of Violation (Address. and Tpi"Account Parcel No). X09 Wh Avenue Nar-th, Edmonds, WA 05201,N) 'r- A Issued To. Epic -rhuesen, Thue _sqn.Cukoin Homes Address Of Person This Order is Iss:' ucdXd;.LU3_3,Wh Plae_e West,Edi-nonds, WA 98,02.0 Code Section Violated,:. In, temational, Residential 4ftti� B.,i4ddling Code'sectJon s 1,06, 108 10.9. Description of Violation: ... Rudding Pepm�J(PLD20_05,rQIQ e�Qired on February 9 2007 without ,rat obtaining all required inspections. Corrective Action Required Resew the p , -�it by re-mitfing fees o -f.$2.896,00 a1us any applicable . iflicable Cit stirchargs.fe-C.S. — ------------------- Correction is Required no later Chan:._ 5:00prn (time) March 9,2,007., IT'corre.c.tion is not made by t -he date and time specified in. the Order, a NoticO.01 Violation shall be issued. The N -of . Notice ()f Civil Violation shall 1 11 assess fines 00.10.0 per dav-, or portion of a day, during which the violation c6ntipues. Date Posted:—, Date Mailed: February 21, 2003 Iss-u-mg Party Jeannine L. Graf Tiflp, Ruildin .g Official, Sign ature FINAL; PRO,JE,CT APPROVALFORM TOe SU D.ATFc, r l.� p 7 MEMO TO:. PERMIT COORDINATOR, BUILDING DIVISION I"RCQ'M:. FIRE DFPA7.RTME.NT DATE ENGINEERING DIVISIQN DATE l 2 D C)7 PLANNING DIVISION DATE / , /7 - PI"HAST! SIGN - - - - PROJECT S r%C . SITE ADDRESSd q✓ -/fir �1�1 17 rn' 4 PERMIT 5� O ZOOS -6 l Y_AM-9 DATE, INSPECTI�D fo' /7 .07 _ R ��C"� �. 10 DESCRIPTION OF WORK TO BE INSPECTE4 (� SC, CGS Y fp,�U'C 1J/� z A field in was conducted to determine e6jr pliance .with -a„pproved plans. Final approval : v denotes that there are no ob ec,tioti's from . the above signed De , artment '-to .the release 'of J, g P e a"z t, PF,RF•.O'RIGIAN'CE BONDS and the granting. of : � D y ... _. M n• f 0 rr. GRANT FINALROJE T APPROVAL ' U < M Z'r- GRANT PROJECT APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS NOTIrD LO Copy of CONDITIONS given to owner/contractor" by inspector FAILED FINAL INSPECTION - OUTSTANDING ISSUCS . m t [ Copy of CORRECTION NOTICI✓ given to pwner/contr-acto,r by inpeetor 2. + 3. ' RE -INSPECTED OUTSTANDING ISSU'>✓S - GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL x Date._ Signiltwre tcmp}bld&fgr7 :ocaprv,l— 3/25/04 1 eM I M10 TO: PERMIT COORININ TOR, BULLDING DIVISION °.' CRO.MI: _� �T 1 I'RI DIP 1fZ.'I'b1f N`f' D:r�'I'1; 11,NOIN (RING (7IVISfON I)A'I 1:_^ _-_ ',` - •-+y.- ION f1.F.A1F..i1GN .- •. ..-...------+I'..`NN I1;`I.CI. I..I,I:-�1��I'.I�-..-aw-•--+-."---_--+.-�..-x.-. C` 1{ P:f RM1.IT 1r. c70 �j ��(�f311.. - 1).�"P1 INSPECTED ---- . D.LSCRLT`I'IO.N Ol WO(2l;'I'O I3F; INS I`'I;0T1-D A field inspection was conducted to detcrinine conipliance with approved plarns. Mimi approval denotes that there ire no ohjee'io.ns from the al?ovc sign.cel Department to. the release =of PF -R ORMANCE 13.ONDS- and tlrc grantine-ar : GRANT FINAL PROJECT APPROVAL E GRANT PROJECT A-PPROVA;L WI FTI CONDITIONS NOTED F [ Copy or COND:tTlON$ giver! to owner/contractor by insl: Wor L'• FAV - L IN.�L I:N 'PCCTION . oursTANDING ISSUES . l Copy tit ('OI2,R.FC�I'ION NNOTICE given to owner/contractor by illp4cto,r L � 3• ; (?LC'I`f3f� OU:I'S'T'{�ND'lNG-I,SSt114S : GRANT FINAL PRO.11'iC:T APPI:t.OVAI, r Si. matur _ • IaC'ITIr.�,)'I CI1a: tf)fF11k:�C11It C.\'� 312510:1 1REC0,RD OFMSPECTIONS INSPECTOR DATE APPROVED SETBACKS .................. FOUNDATION: Footing ............. P. ....... Wall.......................... Pier/.Porch:h ................. let'aining Wall ........... Slab Insulation .......... PLUMBING: Underground ............. Rclugh-ln ................... ComTqrc.ij4 Final HEATING: (3ps Test .................... Gas Piping Equip ment ................. Commqrcial Final ....... EXTERIOR SHEATHING NAILING ........................... FRAMING ....... FIRST FLOOR FRAMING... INSULATION ................... Floor l.n.syla,tion ......... Wall Insulation ...... VCObiling Insulation . ....... SHEETROCK NAILING ... SPECIAL INSPECTION ... `� r -gym , � -�`� .. I M ELLANEOUS .......... MISCELLANEOUS FINAL APPROVAL FOR OCCUPANCY ........ ....... Q)- M—D J- ?I j c Lut, U CIO t7D WaarMci 77 va Get& �,&j Cnr.0- 179 The -11-lit . U1 I's NIT arc Mjj . 19.111 I :q:, m -4I 0 M > ,C:: 0 mi 0 C7 tC M ZI c