The URL can be used to link to this page

BLD20080117.pdf✓`A OF: E� Odd CITY OF EDMONDS 121 51 IT AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS"WA 98020 l A9� PHONE (425)771-0220-FAX (425)771-0221 STATUS: ISSUED 7/18/2008 Permit#: BLD20080117 BUILDING ' Expiration Date:7/18/$0/0 Project Address: 15515 75TH PL W, EDMONDS Parcel No:00500900000101 RONNIE HILLIARD STEVE BARNES GREENWALK DEVELOPMENT LLC 20831 23RD AVE W 1904 3 RD AVE, SUITE 500 12733 39TIl AVE NE LYNNWOOD, WA 98036-7804 SEAM" ILE, WA 98101 SEA '1"'I"LE, WA 98125 425-771-0696 206-6825000 206-367-2797 LICENSE # GREENDL955NS EXP 8/10/2009 I DESCRIPTION SINGE FAMILY RESIDENCE ESLHA OF NORTH EDMONDS VALUATION: $509,827+ J J .5 ab PERMIT TYPE' Residential PERMIT GROUP 64 -Single Family Residence New GRADING:Y CYDS: 490 TYPEOFCONSTRUCTION VB RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: N OCCUPANT GROUP. R3 OCCUPANT LOAD FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE 2006 OTHER:N-------OT HER DESC: ZONE RS20 NUMBER OF STORIES, 2 VEST ED DA I E. NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 1 EXISTING ARFA BASEMENT:0 _ ISTFLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR 0 PROPOSED AREA BASEMENT 614 IST FLOOR 2156 IND FLUOR 431 3 RD FLOOR.0 GARAGE:0 DECK 0 OTHER 0 13RD FLOOR0 GARAGE' 1181 DECK.0 OTHER 0 FRONTSETBACK 1 B REQUI RED: S 10 PROPOSED!13'4' REQUIRED N35'I OTAI,PROPOSED REQUIRED_W 10 PROPOSED 10 0 HEIGHT ALLOWED.25 PROPOSED:20.75 REQUIRED E 35 'TOTAL PROPOSED 66 SETBACK NOTES: SEE V-2007-84; SEE LL 2007-69 (AFN 2008O6065004) I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STAF E LAWS REGULA'I ING CONSTRUCT ION AND IN DOING THE WORK ALL HORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLA PION OF TIIE LABOR CODE OF IHE SI"A'IE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSA I ION INSURANCE AND RCW 1827 Print Name Date Released By ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR SIRUCIURF. UNTIL A FIN AI. INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTTFIC AIt OI' OCCUPANCY HAS 51i I.N GRANTED "BC IOO/IBCI10/1KC110 ARCHIVE APPLICAINT ASSI5SOR OTHER STATUS: ISSUED REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT: 1) Excavation, grading, & site preparation, shoring 2) Soil bearing verification 3) Placement of fill & compaction, Proof Rolling 4) Footing drams, Foundation Drainage, Subsurface drainage 5) Temporary Erosion Control 6) Final Erosion Control 7) Site retaining walls/ debris walls 8) General sae monitoring 9) Final letter from geotechnical engineer of record PLANNING CONDITIONS: BLD2OO8O117 (1) SEPA: Please contact the Planning Division (425.771.0220) immediately if grading is anticipated to exceed 500 cubic yards ofeither cut or fill, because review underthe State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is required. SEPA reviewrequires a completed Enviontmntal Checklist, a $420 processing fee, and a 300' Adjacent Property Owner (APO) list. SEPA review turelines vary. (2) ROCKERY/RE7A1NiNG WALL HEIGHT: Height of rockery/retaining wall shall not exceed three feet in the setback area, as measured from top of rock/wall to original grade. (3) Please contact the Planning Division fora landscape Final Inspection at 425.771.0220. • DEFERRED SUBMrITAL:- STRUCTURAL CALCUTATIONS (STAMPED AND SIGNED BYENGINEER OF RECORD) REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRiOR TO INSTALLATION. • Lot line stakes trust be in place at the time of foundation/setback inspection. • All new, extended, re-buih or relocated electrical utility and/or service shall be placed underground. • Installation, use and maintenance of equipment and components shall be per manufacturer's specifications, installation instructions, and applicable state codes. Provide manufacture's instalation instructions on site for Building Inspector. • Installer shall provide the manufacturers installation, operating instructions, and a whole house ventilation system operation description. A label shall be affixed to the whole house tbmr control that reads "Whole House Ventilation" (see operating instructions). • Maximum Height 25 feet. Measured fromaverage elevation of undisturbed soil at comers of extended building rectangle. Subject to field check by building department. • Hose Bbbs (exterior faucets) are required to have a permanently affixed anti -siphon device installed. • In addition to the requied pressure/regefvalve, an approved listed expansion tank shall be installed on all hot watertanks. Per UPC 608. • Type B or L vent connectors required on foe 1-burning appliances passing through unheated spaces. Per IMC 803.2 • Obtain Electrical Permit fiom State Department of tabor & Industries. 425-290-1309 • Pursuant to UPC6052 a water service shutoff shag be installed on the water lime as it enters the building. • Gas pipe test must be observed by City Building inspector, affidavits shall not be accepted. • City approved plastic piping may be used in water service piping provided that where metal water service piping is used for electrical grounding purposes, replacement piping shall be of like materials (UPC 604.8). A state electrical pen it and inspection is required if electrical grounding is altered, removed, improved, oradded. Contact State Dept. of Labor & industries Electrical Division at 425-29D.1309. • Submit all special inspection reports to the City Building Inspector on a weekly basis. • As required by Ordinance #3632 the geotechnical engineer of record shall monitor this site during construction for compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including: site excavation, shoring, soil support for foundation including piles, sod bearing capacity, subdrainage installation, sod compactions, and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Specific recommendations contained in the approved geotechnical report must be implemented by the owner. The geotechnical engineer shall crake written, dated reports on the progress ofthe construction and submit the report to the Building Official on a weekly basis until all sae grading, drainage, foundation and associated ground work is complete. O issions or deviations from the approved geotechnnical report and/or approved plans or specifications shag be highlighted and amndiately submitted in a seperate letter to the City for review. The City shag be advised in writing of work stoppages of more than one week. in addition to the geotechnical monitoring, special inspections based on the provisions of IBC Section 1704 are required when specified on the approved plans. Other special inspections may also be required by the geotechnical engineer, architect, or structural engineer of record (refer to approved plan set). At the completion of final sae grading and all permitted structures, a final geotechnical report, prepared by the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to the Building 40 zJV!?e711 ? � Official. This report shall contain a statement that, based upon his/her professional opinion, she observations, and testing during the monitoring of the construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements. Any deviations or omissions in the report, plans, or specifications that occured during construction shall be addressed separately. Occupancy, final approval, or release of the bond for the project shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the Building Official. • Any request for aftemate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any aerns not to code specification. • Pursuant to UPC 608 a pressure regulator valve (PRV) shall be installed near the water shutoff. • Sound/Noise originating fromtemporary construction saes as a result of construction activity are exempt fromthe noise limits of BCC Chapter 530 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction saes/activites must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. • Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance fo this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any City ordinance not lint in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision. THIS PERMT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, M4ROUEES. ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMSSION. PERMT TIW LIMT: SEE ECDC 19.00.9n5(Ax6) BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 1 F]NGINEIRING PUBLIC WORKS 425 771 0735 1 PR&TREATMENT 425 672-5755 1 RECYCLING 425 2754801 an Date Prefereed. and whether you orefer moraine or • &Erosion Control(Mobil®tion &StornTightline &Stomn Detention System • &Footing Drain Connection • &Water Service Irate • &Driveway Form & Slope Ver. • 13-Retaining Wall Forms/Location • 6RetainingWall Special Inspection • &Fingi veering Final • B-Setbacks • B-Footings • B-Foundation Wall • B-Isolated Footings/Piers • B-Slab Insulation • B-Plumb Ground Work • &Fast Floor Framing • &Plumb Rough In • B-Gas Test/Pipe • B-Equipment-Meth • B-Exserior Sheathing • BShearNailing • B-Height Verification �DBdll • B•Fran ing • B-WallInsulation/Caulk . B-Floor Insulation/Caulk B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk B-Sheetrock Nail B-Building Final P-Landscape Inspection CITY OF E D M O N D S GARY HAAKENSON MAYOR 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS. WA 98020 • 425-771-0220 • FAX 425-771-0221 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us October 1, 2009 Evergreen Bank Rhonda Bradley 2502 196th Street SW Lynnwood, WA 98036 Re: Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Site Restoration Frozen Fund Account #812810169, Ron & Susan Hilliard at 15515 751h Place W, Edmonds WA Dear Sir or Madam: The City of Edmonds hereby authorizes the release $50,000.00 from the Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Site Restoration Frozen Fund. All interested City departments have approved the release of the Restoration Frozen Fund. Sincerely, Senior Permit Coordinator Cc: Applicant File L,remp/DST's/MasterLettendReleasePerfommce07/01 Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan w 1p Am f%I tI�O�'tlylytlp`, • ��t�t�`�t��t%i��tti`7 • ��t •%� "6 Iya'I j�I `I� �Iityl�I jyOl�j`�yOI , ;:,•.: �_ � '•�'Is�jitl�.jOltt?tj`�iOl��yyNaV�t • `.�7'-q'I�.tOlti•.yttti tI tl�•yt� ��ItI`i�.�itl0%%., t iytltj`Iytytj � + a. 7��itlwtt$'fltit�tl O�t�tlO�t�tlOt d . > titi`i- I,�t OIpI Oitl Oytl tlty�t` • > : iVti tity �'ytI •'ttI �'itI �'ytI -) ' _ .�iNOityNOiNOytlwi�NtytyNOiNt, i � - I " •� � ytlyNttt�yty Nwi - ytltj�jytltjiOl�.`j� ��ilE� I`Itytt fitly i�" N., • �Q�s:Iwi�i_Iwi MOO l Qr �,• %- i g��.....WX WE ��L �Un�/0 l—i'O J/oHYW� \GO(l — ■ �a.va�� v aw JAN 16 2009 DE:vaoPMWT SEIWM CM OR OF S MONDS Retaining HILLIARD RESIDENCE SITE PLAN wal� z Ot /t 5/09 SCALE: t "= 20'-0" *APPROVED BY PLANNING �� COPY a. 0ti.06.09 c ff 11 LL•,7-009 . vi Memo To: Greenwalk LLC(Justin Bames Frorm Robert Pusey, PLS Data W712009 Re: Building Height Verification (Hilliard Residence) Dear Mr. Barnes, As requested, a budding height verification survey has been completed on the Hilliard Residence. The approved design plans for the structure proposed a building elevation of 251.6 with a maximum elevation not to exceed 255.75' As a result of a field survey performed on April 30", 2009 the highest point of the stnxdure is 251.9' at the location shown on the exhibit map attached hereto. Please feel free to contact me at (425)778-5620 If you have any additional questions concerning this matter. Thank you, Robert W. Pusey, PLS J HEIGHT CALCULATIONS: /00,--i— C=217 D = 260 230 I AVERAGE GRADE = 230.75 228 � j PROPOSED HIGHEST +2�I i y POINT- 251.E 26� MAX. HT. ALLOWED = 255.75 ACTUAL HEIGHT PER SURVEY ON APRIL 30, 2009 = 251.9 Lu uj '4-224�'�� O �H LlA_RQ_9llQELOCATED POINT OF ROOF HIGHEST II I I OVERHANG II I ELEV: 251.9' 42221 20 —218 '_— 212�� ` �� 0 crm � SURVEYORS NOTE - THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS TO SHOW ELEVATION CALCULATIONS FOR DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED AND SUBSEOUENTLY THE ACTUAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. ALL OTHER INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED ON FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. HEIGHT DETERMINATION SURVEY CLIENT: RON HILLIARD SITE ADDRESS: 15515 75TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS, WA PGS PROJECT NO: 04-030-01 SCALE: 1'-20' SITE BENCHMARK 5/8- REBAR AND ELEV-219.50' PACIFlC GEOMATIC SERVICES, INC. LAND SURVEYING do MAPPING SERVICES QUALITY SERVICE — CREATIVE SOLUTIONS WOO 216TH STREET SW, STE. 304 PGS /NC MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043 PHONE: (425) 778-W20 FAX (425) 775-2849 WEB: www.PacGWne.com --1 xy i - +z2s 21 6 I--2241 1 �. /HILLIARD RE51DENCI- POINT OF ROOF OVERHANG I I OVERHANG II I ELEV: 251.9' _ 42221 / _jj s _-_-+220 — -21 a 212 EII HT CALCULATIONS: ��-A-226 /-8=220 ��-C=217 D=260 AVERAGE GRADE = 230.75 i PROPOSED HIGHEST h POINT= 251.6 j y MAX, HT. ALLOWED - 255.75 \ r ' ACTUAL HEIGHT PER SURVEY ON APRIL 30, 2009 - 251.9 w° W O J PPROOJEECE -7 \ SSMH RIM.�K 75th PLACE_VV�_-�- ELEV-209.1�2'_ -1A SURVEYORS NOTE - THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS TO SHOW ELEVATION CALCULATIONS FOR DETERMINING THE MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT ALLOWED AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE ACTUAL HEIGHT OF THE STRUCTURE. ALL OTHER INFORMATION SHOWN IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED ON FOR ANY OTHER PURPOSE. HEIGHT DETERMINATION SURVEY CLIENT: RON HILLIARD SITE ADDRESS: 15515 75TH PLACE WEST, EDMONDS, WA PGS PROJECT NO: 04-030-01 SCALE: 1'-20' PACIFIC GEOMATIC SERVICES, INC. LAND SURVEYING k MAPPING SERVICES QUALITY SERMCE - CREATIVE SOLUTIONS 6608 216TH STREET SW, STE. 304 PIGS /NC MOUNTLAKE TERRACE, WA 98043 PHONE.(425) 778-5620 FAX:(425) 775-2849 WEB: www.PacGeoinc.com a o, A O o C � CD $ m a ca j N m S m a 0 ty d a — m � m 40 m 0 1 M m z m z p:m D zit y Jz spy mO z �Cz, ci per: n. O Z m ,, rj . O z N O 0 O O 6 J V tIQ Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. December 12, 2007 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 — 216tb Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043 17625-1301h Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425.844.1977 Fax: 425.844-1987 Final Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk Proposed Single Family Residence 156th Street Southwest and 75°i Place West RECEIVED Parcel No. 00500900000101 Edmonds, Washington DEC 18 2007 CG File No. 2212 BUILDING DEPT. Dear Mr. Hilliard: We have prepared this letter as the Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk, as required by the City of Edmonds (ECDC 19.10.040). Our scope of services has included review of our original Geotechnical Engineering Report, dated January 22, 2007, review of the architectural and structural plans by Cornerstone Architectural Group, dated May 7, 2007, review of the Structural Calculations for Hilliard Residence by Peterson, Strehle, Martinson, Inc. Consulting Engineers, dated May, 2007, review of the GeoEngineers, Inc. Landslide Hazard Map, dated July 25, 1984, telephone conversations with Steve Barnes of Cornerstone Architectural Group and David Stubbs of Peterson, Strehle, Martinson, Inc. and review of the updated architectural and structural plans, which were forwarded to our office on December 10, 2007. The critical aspect of the geotechnical design is that we have recommended that a wall be constructed to resist forces generated by a debris slide. We recommend that the wall have a minimum height of 12.5 feet. This could be reduced to 10 feet where the debris is deflected laterally or if some overtopping of the wall is acceptable. Where the wall is incorporated into the house, some deflection of the debris is possible and the 10 foot height is appropriate. Where the wall is separate from the house, some overtopping can occur. rN A° COPY Proposed Single Family Residence — Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk 156'" Street Southwest and 75' Place West Edmonds, Washington December 12, 2007 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 The updated plans and specifications that we have reviewed conform to the recommendations presented in the original geotechnical report and our letter of December e. The basement and debris wall systems have been designed with adequate heights, per the geotechnical report. The debris wall structural design calculations have a hand marked correction for the equivalent active fluid pressure at 85 pcf for the loads above the elevation of the future ground surface, as we had recommended. The revised plans also show the recommended debris wall extension to the south, as we had recommended. Provided the construction observation services recommended in the original geotechnical report are implemented, it is our opinion that the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties, from soil instability will be minimal and the proposed development will not increase the potential for soil movement. The referenced GeoEngineers Landslide Hazard Map indicates that the site is in an area that would be most susceptible to debris slides where failure would be in material that has not previously failed. The probability of movement indicated on the map is between about 2 and 5 percent in 25 years. It is our opinion that the upper 1.25 feet of the soil encountered along the slope is loose and most susceptible to movement. The probability of movement is considered much higher than the 5 percent shown on the map. This is noted in our original report and was the basis for our recommended wall heights and debris system It is our opinion that the wall system, with the plan revisions described herein, will provide the required debris retention and reduce the risk of damage to the structure. It is our opinion that the risk for deep seated slide activity is low, on the order of 2 to 5 percent. This probability estimate is based on the GeoEngineers map. A rigorous probability analysis was not completed for this site, nor is it feasible. If debris slides do occur, cleaning of material behind the wall will likely be needed in order to maintain volume for future slides. We note that yard landscaping will be at risk during a slide event and will require repair or replacing. Within the limits of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our services have been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this area at the time this report was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. ,•r. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Proposed Single Family Residence — Geotechnical Declaration and Statement of Risk 1561° Street Southwest and 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington December 12, 2007 CG File No. 2212 Page 3 We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Sean L. Caraway, PE Senior Engineer co&;"F of wasy r z f � 12f tz�01 1 sozas C�SIpNAL�'` ExVIRFs 61171 tq Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal SLC:CPC:am Four Copies Submitted cc: Mr. Steve Barnes, Cornerstone Architectural Group —1 Copy Comerstone Geotechnical, Inc. N �r ETERSON JJTREHLE d ARTINSON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS December 18, 2007 Steve Barnes Cornerstone Architectural Group RE: Hillard Residence 156a' Street SW Edmonds, Washington Steve: Structural Engineer declaration: We have reviewed the geotechnical report and understand its' recommendations, have explained to the owner the risk of loss due to slides on this site and have incorporated into the design the recommendations of the geotechnical report and designed in measures to reduce the potential risk of Injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. Sincerely, PETERSON STREHLE MARTINSON, INC. M. David Stubbs, PE, SE Vice President ID {EXPIRES 5117f pvf 2200 SIXTH AVENUE, SUITE 601 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98121 RECEIVED DEC 1 8 2007 BUILDING DEPT. PHONE 206-622-4580 FAX 206-622-0422 CITY COPY CORNERSTONE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP December 18, 2007 City of Edmonds Re: Hilliard Residence To Whom It May Concern: Applicant/Owner liability & landsclide acknowledgement: The accuracy of permit submittal information is warranted by the applicant and relieves the City and it's staff from any liability associated with reliance on such permit application submittals. All conclusions referenced in submitted reports shall be those of the applicant and associated design professionals. The applicant and owner understand and accept the risk of developing in an area with potentially unstable soils and understand the required temporary and permanent erosion control and site maintenance issues associated with specific geologic hazards or conditions of the site that may affect slope stability over time. The owner will advise, in writing, any prospective purchaser of the site, or any prospective lessees of structures on the site, of the slide potential and on -going maintenance issues of the area on the property. Sincerely, Steve Barnes t-� A WfiES AZ ,;,{,; gA RECEIVED DEC. 1 8 2007 BUILDING DEPT, CITY COPY 1904 THIRD AVENUE SUITE 500 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101 206.682.5000 TEL 206.621.7717 FAX WWW.CORNERSTONEARCH.COM CORNERSTONE ARCHITECTURAL GROUP November 9, 2007 City of Edmonds Re: Hilliard Residence To Whom it May Concern: Lead Design Professional Designation and Statement: Steve Barnes with Cornerstone Architectural Group shall be the lead design professional for the applicant. We have reviewed the geotechnical report and understand its' recommendations and have incorporated into the design the established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage from any earth movement predicted in the report. Architect/Engineer declaration: We have reviewed the geotechnical report and understand its' recommendations, have explained to the owner the risk of loss due to slides on this site and have incorporated into the design the recommendations of the geotechnical report and designed in measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. Sincerely, Steve Barnes �•""' " gT6t:i0F r> ,a :i RECEIVED DEC 18 2007 BUILDING DEPT. i� COPY 1904 THIRD AVENUE SUITE 500 SEATTLE. WASHINGTON 98101 206.682.5000 TEL 206.621."17 FAX W W W.CORNEKSTONEARCKCOM RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 CONFORMED COPY 200804141166 �g� 5 PGS OSWOMISBCOUN2T1I %8"IINNGTON COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATIONMOLD HARMLESS Reference #: -VI) c2/ 7 Grantor(s): (1):Rg2AJ U I LLoAP-0 (2) ':�USAAJ j ILLIARbAdditional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec_j2!5_Twn 2�_Rna 'i E Qtr_ 1W OR Lot Block Plat Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) 6o5[)n40cy0c)o 10 Assessor's Tax Parcel ID# not yet assigned CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY:—&W:� DATE:AGE I OF c5 Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residentRd structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: MICROFILM JAP PROyED FOR RED �- BY: ATE S PAGE �_ OF 1. Description of Subiect Property. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of ( S S I s —( S'T V P L 14/ (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: `�410gE k�OttTtCt�l� of --rP- TS IS 4 I -LAM S /.� Any, T1 A. a MpAC 5 EAS-VOIV? of 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to Obtain a building permit for the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building_ permit file number o2Q2M/7 (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of ��il/,•s � � /� fir: • �3 the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development. In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors. in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property_ either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or PABAYPP:-RO OR RE DATE. OWY, G � OF arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit 4. Insurance Requirement In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land, binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender -to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. DONE this 9 TN day of AJn, /c M RF 2 By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Ron N X` ara o a 5jbc�,C�, signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument. DATED this g day of M bQC.tvA'b x-7 , sd��444,L-7 NOTARY PUBLIC My commission ezpires:.i"!5- ;)O 11 LITEMP%B UnD INC V KEADO VAM V ENANf Cornerstone %--' Geotechnical, Inc. March 27, 2008 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 — 2161h Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043 Seismic Hazard Letter 156d' Street Southwest and 75'h Place West Parcel No. 00500900000101 Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Dear Mr. Hilliard: 17625-130"h Ave. NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 4254W4-1977 Fax: 4254844-1987 RESUB APR 24 2008 BUILDING CTY OF DMONDSNT You plan to construct a residence at your site at the intersection of 1561° Street Southwest and 75'h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. The site has parcel number 00500900000101. We prepared a geotechnical report for the project dated January 22, 2007. That report referenced the sections of the 2003 IBC for seismic hazards. Your consultant, Mr. Steve Barnes, has informed us that the City of Edmonds has adopted the 2006 IBC, and he requested that we prepare this letter to update our seismic hazard to reference the 2006 IBC. This letter should be considered a supplement to our report. It is our opinion based on our subsurface explorations that the Soil Profile in accordance with Table 1613.5.2 of the 2006 International Building Code (IBC) is Site Class D. As referenced in the 2006 IBC, we used the US Geological Survey program "Seismic Hazard Curves and Uniform Hazard Response Spectra" That program uses 2003 NEHRP Seismic Design Provisions to obtain values for S„ SI, F„ and F,,. The seismic design parameters are: S, 124.2% g S, 43.7% g F. 1.003 F, 1.563 OTY TInV E i Seismic Hazard letter 15e Street Southwest and 75" Place West Parcel No.00500900000101 Edmonds, Washington March 27, 2008 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 Site specific coefficients and adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response acceleration parameters apply as shown in Section 1613.5 of the IBC. Based on the USGS data and Tables 1613.5.6(1) and (2), the site has Seismic Design Category D. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. CH 5/2-7/69 37350 1 E%pIRES 041251 10 1 Thor Christensen, PE Senior Engineer TRC:RBP:am One Copy Submitted cc: Mr. Steve Barnes — Cornerstone Architectural Group (Three Copies) Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists February 11, 2009 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 - 21 a Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Dry Season Extension Request - Retaining Wall and Utilities Ron Hilliard Residence 15515 - 75'" Place West Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Building Permit # 2008-0117 Dear Mr. Hilliard: RECEIVED FEB 13 2009 OEMOPMENTSEAVICEs CTR CITY OF EDMONDs We have prepared this letter in support of a dry season extension for the planned construction of a retaining wall and installation of utilities at your project located at 15515 - 751' Place West in Edmonds, Washington The site has been designated an environmentally critical area due to its location within the Meadowdale landslide complex. Final stages of the project consist of construction of a new retaining wall from the northwest comer of the house to the northwest corner of the property and tie-in of underground utilities to existing utilities within 75m Place West. The wall will consist of a Redi-Rock concrete gravity wall. Granular material is planned to be used for backfill behind the retaining wall. This material Will help minimitracking off -site and erosion The utility trench is located within yard areas and will not support concrete slabs or other structures. We discussed the trenchwork, and the contractor informed us he plans to cover excavated material with plastic until use as backfill. We recommended compacting the trench material as best as possible to minimifuture trench settlements. The work should not be completed during periods of rainfall. Any water within the trench should be removed prior to placing backfill. Gravels or cobbles should not be placed 17625 -130'h Avenue NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone: 425494-1977 • Fax: 425-844-1987 Dry Season Extension Rey. _dt for Retaining Wall and Utilities Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 February 11, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 against the utility pipes. If the areas are covered with plastic during rainy weather and during times of no construction activity, we do not consider these items as significant earthwork efforts. The site has currently been stabilized by installation of Best Management Practices (BMP's) throughout the site where needed We have evaluated these BMP's and reported the results in field reports on a weekly basis during the wet season grading period We plan to continue to evaluate effectiveness of the BMP's during weekly onsite visits for earthwork that will take place during the wet season. It is our opinion that using the current BMP's and following those recommended in this letter, a grading extension would not create significant additional erosion and that the potential of erosion can be controlled by maintaining the BMP's. M•. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Dry Season Extension Req_ _st for Retaining Wall and Utilities Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 February 11, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 3 We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical. Inc. Project Manager 41110°1 �F- �Ss�c; aaL Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted JRW:CPC:am cc: City of Edmonds — one copy Mr. Steve Barnes, Cornerstone Architectural Group — one copy Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. .1 ETERSON JTREHLE 1 IARTINSON, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS September 19, 2008 Steve Barnes Cornerstone Architectural Group RE: Hilliard Residence, 15515 — 75"' Place West Edmonds, Washington (2008-0117) Reinforcing Steel Inspection Steve: A representative from our office visited the site to review the placement of reinforcing steel prior to pouring concrete. At the time of our visit, the concrete for the footings had been placed. The steel reinforcing for walls along the exterior was placed and tied but the concrete walls had not been poured. Reinforcing steel conforms to the current structural drawings. RECEIVED 0 C T - 9 2008 Sincerely, PETERSON STREHLE MARTINSON, INC. M. David Stubbs, PE, SE Vice President Cif 111 DING DEPT. 2200 SIXTH AVENUE, SUITE 601 PHONE 206-622-4580 SEATTLE WASHINGTON 98121 FAX 206-622-0422 Cornerstk,ne Geotechnical, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists April 9, 2009 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 - 216" Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Wall Drain Installation Ron Hilliard Residence 15515 - 75 h Place West Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Building Permit # 2008-0117 Dear Mr. Hilliard: RECEIVED APR 14 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR CITY OF EDMONDS This letter documents our observations of wall back drain installation at your residence project located at 15515 - 75 h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. We have been requested by Steve Barnes, your architect to complete this letter in compliance with a request from the City of We were on site during excavation for the retaining wall footings as documented in our field reports. The walls were backfilled prior to our next site visit. We did observe that a drainage composite existed against the wall at the top of the backfill. We also observed drainpipe extending from the backfill at the sides of the excavation. The drain pipe was 4 inch perforated pipe with a mess containing Styrofoam "peanuts" around the pipe. Both of these conditions are documented in project photographs. The project architect, Steve Barnes stated that he had been on site before backfllling and that the drainage system had been properly installed as shown on the plans. A black coating to restrict vapor was also observed to have been painted on the concrete. 17625 -130th Avenue NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone: 4254 44-1977 • Fax: 425-844-1987 Wall Drain Installation Ron Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 April 9, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 Based on our observations and discussions with Mr. Barnes, it is our opinion that the wall drainage systems have been properly installed. We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions or need fiuther clarification, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. V`v"v v k�Wn Jeff Wale Project Manager 'LVLuo Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted JRW:CPC:am cc: City of Edmonds — one copy Mr. Steve Barnes, Cornerstone Architectural Group — one copy Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists May 14, 2009 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 — 2le Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Revised Wall Drain Installation Letter Ron Hilliard Residence 15515 — 75" Place West Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Building Permit # 2008-0117 Dear Mr. Hilliard: FE��IVE1) JUN . 3 2009 OEVELCYtdENiSE:RVICES CTR CITY OF ED&IONDS This letter documents our observations of wall back drain installation at your residence project located at 15515 — 75t° Place West in Edmonds, Washington. We have been requested by Mr. Steve Barnes, your architect, to complete this letter in compliance with a request from the City of 1!TO IL We were on site during excavation for the retaining wall footings as documented in our field reports. The walls were backfilled prior to our next site visit. We did observe that a drainage composite existed against the wall at the top of the backfill. We also observed drainpipe extending from the backfill at the sides of the excavation. The drain pipe was 4 inch perforated pipe with a mesh containing Styrofoam "peanuts" around the pipe. Both of these conditions are documented in project photographs. The project architect, Steve Barnes stated that he had been on site before backfilling and that the drainage system had been properly installed as shown on the plans. A black coating to restrict vapor was also observed to have been painted on the concrete. 17625 —1301h Avenue NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone: 425 V*1977 • Fax: 425-844-1987 Revised Wall Drain Instah...on Letter Ron Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 May 14, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 We also met with the earthwork contractor onsite while he was preparing to connect roof and yard drains to stormwater vault. The location of the vault has been moved from the southern region. The vault is now connected to the residential structure at the southwest comer. The new location of the vault will allow discharge to an existing catchbasin located at the southwest corner of the site. We were informed by Steve that the new vault has the same stormwater collection volume as the vault observed in plans. Footing drains are planned to outfall at the northwest and southwest comers of the site to rock outfalls. The rock outfalls will be created during final landscaping. We observed a footing drain pipe daylight near the southwest region. The footing drain at the northwest corner was attached to the wall drain in this area and daylights north of the block retaining wall at the base of the wall. Seepage was not observed during excavations for foundation and soils appeared to be dry to moist. We therefore expect minimal water will be collected from the footing drain. It is our opinion that the footing drain outfalls are adequate because of the minimal water expected to be collected. Based on our observations and discussions with Mr. Barnes, it is our opinion that the wall drainage systems have been properly installed. The roof drains connections to the vault and footing drain outfalls are expected to be completed soon. .•. Comerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Revised Wall Drain htstah--on Letter Ron Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 May 14, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 3 We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please call. Sincerely, Comerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Jeff Wale Project Manager x 0S P. c o V r �F \VAS q 1/ F 202ai RAC VALG: Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted JRW:CPC:am cc: City of Edmonds — one copy Mr. Steve Barnes, Cornerstone Architectural Group — one copy Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists June 19, 2009 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 - 216t° Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043 Water Feature Letter Ron Hilliard Residence 15515 - 75ih Place West Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Building Permit # 2008-0117 Dear Mr. Hilliard: JUN 23 2009 Ci ^i OF ED :DINGS This letter documents our observations and recommendations for the water feature installed at your residence project located at 15515 - 75 h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. We have been requested by Steve Barnes, your architect to complete this letter in compliance with a request from the City of Edmonds. A water feature has been constructed in the northern region of the site, off the northeast comer of the residential structure. We did not observe installation of the water feature, but have been informed by Steve Barnes, the site architect, of the design and construction. The information provided is that the water feature was constructed with a plastic liner at the base of the feature to prevent water from seeping into the onsite soils. A felt base was also placed below the plastic liner to prevent punctures from subgrade conditions. Any punctures to the water feature plastic liner would be expected from tree branches that fall from the slope above the feature. If this occurs, the puncture should be fixed immediately. CITY COPY 17625 -1301h Avenue NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone: 425444-1977 • Fax 425-844-1987 Water Feature Letter Ron Hilliard Residence Edmonds, Washington Building Permit # 2008-0117 June 19, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Page 2 Based on our observations and discussions with Mr. Barnes, it is our opinion that the water feature will not adversely affect the stability of the sloping conditions at the site. Excess water should not be allowed to enter the subgrade soils from punctures within the base of the pond liner. We trust that this letter meets your needs at this time. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please call. Sincerely, Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Jeff Wale Project Manager 9' DES V. coV�. VVA / F _ chitoi 20285 SIpNpS,�G .x� --A@9w, Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted JRW:CPC cc: City of Edmonds — one copy Mr. Steve Barnes, Cornerstone Architectural Group — one copy Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. DRAFT TECHNICAL 14 LANDAU ASSOCIATES MEMORANDUM TO: Ann Bullis, Building Official City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Building Division v FROM: Dennis R. Stettler, P.E. j+J ! 23 2Tu� DATE: June 29, 2009 RE: SUPPLEMENTAL GEOTECHNICAL PEER REvJEw RELATED TO WATER FEATURE BUILDING PERMIT No. 2008-0117 HILLIARD SFR-15515 75TH PLACE WEST EDMONDS, WASHINGTON This technical memorandum provides our geotechnical peer review comments related to a water feature constructed at the Hilliard residence within the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA) of North Edmonds. Landau Associates has previously conducted a geotechnical peer review for the project and several supplemental issues, and the results of those previous reviews have been documented in technical memoranda provided to the City of Edmonds (City). The City has issued a building permit and the construction of the residence is largely complete at this time. The current review addresses a water feature that has been constructed on the property that was not a part of the original building permit application package reviewed by the City and Landau Associates. Our services for this task are covered by Task Order No. 09-10 of the On -Call and Emergency/Disaster Response Geotechnical and Environmental Engineering Services Contract between Landau Associates and the City. The project has been constructed within the Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area of North Edmonds and is required to meet the requirements of Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 19.10 that is applicable to this area. ECDC Section 19.10.070D prohibits the construction of "ponds or other artificial impoundments of water" within the earth subsidence and landslide hazard area because of the critical relationship of groundwater to overall stability of the area and concerns that surface water infiltration or discharge to the ground could adversely impact groundwater levels and slope stability. The water feature that has been constructed on the property is not consistent with the requirements of ECDC Section 19.10.070D. ECDC Section 19.10.070E states that "The prohibitions established in subsection (D) of this section shall apply unless the property owner requests a waiver based upon the written analysis of a geotechnical engineer which clearly establishes that the proposed improvement will have no reasonable likelihood of triggering or otherwise contributing to any landslide hazard or earth subsidence risk either on the site or in the neighboring earth subsidence or landslide hazard area." 130 2nd Avenue South • Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 778-0907 • fax (425) 778-6409 • w .Iandauinc.com Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. (the geotechnical engineer of record for the project) has prepared a letter addressing this issue titled: Water Feature Letter, Proposed Ron Hilliard Residence, 15515 75" Place West, Edmonds, WA, CG File No. 2212, Building Permit #2008-0117. Prepared for Mr. Ron Hilliard by Cornerstone Geotechnical, dated June 19, 2009. Cornerstone Geotechnical did not directly observed the installation of the water feature, but has relied on information provided by Steve Barnes, the project architect, regarding the design and construction of the water feature. Cornerstone Geotechnical states that they were informed that the water feature was constructed with a plastic liner at the base to prevent water from seeping into the onsite soils, and a felt base was placed beneath the plastic liner to provide a cushion. Cornerstone Geotechnical provides their opinion that "the water feature will not adversely affect the stability of the sloping conditions on the site." A water feature that contains a properly designed, constructed, and maintained impermeable liner that prevents any infiltration or discharge of surface water to the ground or groundwater should not have an adverse affect on slope stability. On that basis, the waiver request to allow the water feature to remain appears to be reasonable. The property owner should recognize that the presence of this feature and any defects in its design or construction, or improper maintenance and operation, could expose the owner to damage or liabilities associated with slope movement that is exacerbated by the failure of this water feature to perform as intended. rtrtrtsss This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City in evaluating the requested waiver for the water feature constructed at the Hilliard single family residence at 15515 75" Place West. The focus of this review was the geotechnical aspects of the request. The purpose of the review was to assess the adequacy of the waiver request for compliance with City requirements contained in ECDC 19.10 and conformance with conventionally accepted geotechnical engineering practices. This geotechnical peer review by Landau Associates does not lessen the requirements for the applicant's geotechnical consultant, and other design professionals, to prepare an appropriate design for the site conditions. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City. Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. DRS/rgm 2 DRAFT RON & SUSAN HILLIARD I2083123+Ave w Lrwwood, WA 98036 Phone(425)111-0696 Ronh@pacgeoinc.mm July7, 2009 City of Edmonds Patrick Lawler Planning Department Edmonds, Washington Re: Hilliard Residence BLD20090248 • Water Feature Waiver Request Dear Patrick, The purpose of this letter is to request a waiver to allow a water feature to exist at our new home site within the Meadowdale Beach Slide Area. Apparently there has been a lot of discussions conceming this between my architect Steve Barnes, and City of Edmonds staff. The waterfeature consists of a small waterfall thatflows into a small pond. The water is then recirculated back to the top of the waterfall. The entire feature is lined with an impermeable, heavy duty, rubberized, pond liner. The pond area is approximately 15' long by 3' wide and 9" deep with a trough at the end for a pump. The pond holds roughly 350 gallons. The feature is not plumbed and must be manually filled. I am attaching letter from my geotechnical engineer stating the water feature should have no adverse affect on the slope. I am also including a photo of the feature and some correspondence between the architect and the City. I appreciate yourconsideration in granting us this waiver allowing the water feature. SYr�sr�yus t� v" '� JUL U ZuJJ .iY.L iv Vlll. cry CF EL ry$, r,Do Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Consulting Geotechnical Engineers & Geologists September 28, 2009 Mr. Ron Hilliard 6608 - 216'h Street SW, Suite 304 Mountlake Terrace, Washington 98043 Geotechnical Final Letter Proposed Single -Family Residence 15515 - 75'" Place West Edmonds, Washington CG File No. 2212 Permit Number 2008-0117 Dear Mr. Hilliard: RECEIVED SEP 3 0 2009 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C1R. CITY OF EDMONDS This letter summarizes our observations during construction for your residence located at 15515 - 75'h Place West in Edmonds, Washington. We observed geotechnical aspects of construction on a part-time basis from August 23, 2008 to September 10, 2009. Our observations have been documented in Field Reports 1 through 35. As required by the City of Edmonds, we have observed, and/or provided our evaluation of the following required geotechnical tasks which were outlined in the permit documents: 1. Excavation, Grading, Site Preparation and Shoring We observed grading and excavations within the project site. The excavations were contained within the project site, and shoring was not required. 2. Soil Bearing Verification Project specifications called for the addition of 2 feet of structural fill placed under footings or an approved subgrade. We evaluated the footing subgrade and provided recommendations for overexcavation. We also evaluated the 2 feet of structural fill where used. An allowable foundation bearing pressure of 1,500 psf was used CITY COPY 17625 -130A Avenue NE, C102, Woodinville, WA 98072 • Phone: 425-844-1977 • Fax 425.844-1987 Geotechnical Final Letter 15515—75"Place West Edmonds, Washington September 28, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Permit Number 2008-0117 Page 2 3. Placement of Fill and Compaction, Proofrolling Fill placement was required under footings for the planned structure as discussed in the soil bearing verification section of this letter. Fill placed was evaluated as meeting requirements. Structural fill was not required elsewhere within the site. 4. Footing Drain, Subdrainage Installation, Foundation Drainage Footing drains were installed around the perimeter of the site and wall drains were observed extending to the footing drains. Our documentation of drainage installation is provided in our letter of April 9, 2009. 5. Temporary Erosion Control and Final Erosion Control We have monitored temporary erosion control during the earthwork phase of site construction. We did not observe significant erosion of material off the site, any erosion observed offsite was promptly cleaned by the contractor. Temporary erosion control measures performed satisfactorily. A final erosion control visit was performed and it appears that surficial soils have been covered with grass or mulch. Final landscaping appears adequate to control erosion. 6. Site Retaining Wall, Debris Walls A tiered block retaining wall was constructed in the northern region of the site. We were offite during a portion of the construction of the wall. We evaluated wall configuration during construction. Based on our observations and evidence observed in the field, the wall was built according to our recommendations. The east side of the residence is protected from surficial landslides by a debris catchment system. This includes a combination of concrete walls, and the structure framing itself. Upon review of the final construction, it is our opinion that sufficient volume has been created for the design debris event recommended in our report. It is our opinion, based on site observations and testing during construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements. Although the structure has been designed for a debris event, it is best to use practices that reduce the chance of the debris event from occurring, and if it occurs to reduce the overall size of the event. The concentration of water on the slope is one of the largest contributors of slope instability. We recommend that observations of water flowing from the slope be considered as Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Final Letter 15515—75"Place West Edmonds, Washington September 28, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Permit Number 2008-0117 Page 3 on -going slope maintenance. This should be completed during and following large storm events. If drainage flows change, the cause should be investigated and some type of remediation should be completed as necessary. The vegetation on the slope should also be maintained. Any disturbed areas should be replanted with native vegetation. We have consulted with an engineer with experience on steep slopes with a shallow topsoil zone, and he has recommended the future planting of Hazelnut and Dogwood trees. He indicated that they root structure of those trees would help tie the surficial topsoil to the slope. With time, the catchment areas may accumulate slope wash created by raveling or small debris flows. It will be important to maintain these areas free of this material in order to maintain the design catchment volume. We would expect that this could be completed during the summer months, unless a large event occurs. If a large event does occur, the area should be cleaned out in a timely manner. 2•. Comerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Geotechnical Final Letter 15515 — 75 h Place West Edmonds, Washington September 28, 2009 CG File No. 2212 Permit Number 2008-0117 Page 4 Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget for our services, we have strived to take care that our services have been completed in accordance with generally accepted practices followed in this region at the time this letter was prepared. No other conditions, expressed or implied, should be understood. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you. If there are any questions concerning this letter or if we can provide additional services, please call. Sincerely, Project Manager v, co&� � of '' x 9IZ�%� v' 2u2as p 'PFGrS'['ER� S1ONAIL Charles P. Couvrette, PE Principal Three Copies Submitted JRW:CPC:am cc: City of Edmonds Building Department Steve Barnes — Cornerstone Architectural Group Comerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Pacific Services, Geomatic Inc. Memo To: Greenwalk LLC/ Justin Barnes From: Robert Pusey, PLS Date: 5/13P2009 Re: Building Height Verification (Hilliard Residence) Dear Mr. Barnes, As requested, a building height verification survey has been completed on the Hilliard Residence The datum point for the verification was the Project Site Bench Mark, a sanitary sewer manhole lid located in 7e Place W., southerly of the site with a project elevation of 209.82 feet The approved design plans for the structure proposed a building elevation of 251.6' with a maximum elevation not to exceed 255,75' As a result of a field survey performed on April 30", 2009 the highest point of the structure is 251.9' at the location shown on the exhibit map attached hereto. Please feel free to contact me at (425)778-5620 if you have any additional questions concerning this matter. Thank you, Robert W. Pusey, PLS CITY OF EDMONDS SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT The project at _ /.J J /.3 /J /"L VV issued under building permit number ALL IA A—ni 17 requires special inspection and/or testing per IBC Chapter 17. The complete list of special inspections Is attached to this document. BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ISSUED: The owner and contractor and special inspector shall complete this agreement and the attached structural test(s) and inspections schedule including the required acknowledgements. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTORS: Each special inspector shall be approved by the Building Official prior to performing any duties or inspections. Each special Inspector shall submit Statement of Qualifications to the Building Official for review. Special inspectors shall display identification when performing special inspections on site. Special inspection and testing shall meet the minimum requirements of IBC Chapter 17 and the following: A. Duties and Responsibilities of the Special Inspector I. Observe Work The special inspector shall observe the site work for conformance with the approved (stamped) plans and specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the BBC. Architect or Engineer reviewed shop drawings may be used only as an aid to inspection. Special Inspections are to be performed on a continuous basis —meaning that the special inspector Is on site at all times observing the work requiring special inspection. Periodic inspections, if any, must have prior approval by the City based on a separate written plan reviewed and approved by the Building Official and the engineer or architect of record. 2. Report Non-conformingltems The special Inspector shall bring non -conforming items to the Immediate attention of the contractor and note all such items In the daily field report Any item not resolved in a timely manner shall be immediate cause of the special inspector to notify the Building Official of the plan deviation, error, change or omission. It shall also be the duty of the special Inspector to promptly notify the engineer or architect. 3. Complete Daily Reports Each special inspector shall complete and sign both the special Inspection record and the daily report form for each day's inspection. These records shall remain at the jobsite with the contractor for review by the City Building Inspector. 4. Furnish Weekly Reports The special inspector or Inspection agency shall furnish the City with weekly reports of tests and inspections. The project engineer or architect, and others as designated shall also be copied on reports. Weekly reports must include the following: • Description of daily lnspeetions and tests made with applicable locations • List of all lion -conforming Items • Report on status of non -conforming Items (resolved or unresolved) • Itemized changes authorized by the Architect, Engineer and City If not Included in non- conformance items. 5. - Furnish Final Construction Report The special inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final signed report to the City stating that all items requiring special Inspection and testing were fulfilled and reported. And, to the best of L:\TEMP\BUBDING'1SpeciallnspectionAgreementtBC.doc 7104 RESUB JUN 3 0 2008 Bta&,,a � � or, blither knowledge the project is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and the applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC Items not in conformance or unresolved items or any discrepancies in Inspection coverage, (Le., missed Inspections, periodic inspection when continuous inspections were required, etc.) shall be specifically Itemized In this report. B. Contractor Responsibilities 1. Notify the Special Inspector It Is the duty of the contractor to notify the special inspector when work is ready for special inspection. Note, the items listed on the attached schedule and as noted on the approved plans and specifications are required to have special Inspections. Adequate notice shall be provided by the contractor so that the special inspector has time to become familiar with the project. 2. Provide Access to Approved Plans The contractor is responsible for providing the special inspector access to approved plans at the jobsite. 3. Retain Special Inspection Records The contractor is responsible to retain at the jobsite all special inspection records submitted by the special Inspector. These records are to be provided to the City building inspector upon request. C. City of Edmonds Building Department Responsibilities 1. Approve special inspectors or Inspection agencies The building department shall approve all special inspectors and special Inspection requirements. 2. Monitor special Inspection and approve weekly reports Work requiring special inspection and the performance of special Inspectors shall be monitored by the City Building Inspector. His/Her approval must be obtained prior to placement of concrete or other similar activities In addition to that of the special inspector. 3. Issue Certificate of Occupancy The Building Official may Issue a Certificate of Occupancy after all weekly special Inspection reports including the final report have been submitted and accepted. D. Owner Responsibilities The project owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent shall fund special inspection services. E. Engineer or Architect of Record Responsibilities The engineer or architect of record shall Include special inspection requirements on the plans and specifications. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS n ' m m y with the terms and conditions of this agreement. Owner Date Z7-08 Special bate 6/,23/p2� General Contractor / i � '•�d >,1J W1%C1L Qr J Date r City Building Official Date L-\TEMP\BUILDING1SpeciallnspectionAgnxmentIBC.doc 7/04 SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING SCHEDULE REWORCED CONCRETE, GUNTTE, GROUT AND MORTAR: MASONRY: —SilgeWhapeconSatassa Dsed —Ptchminvy AnaepanaaTau Waseary Wks. Wall Pisan) _SebaryKm Taos Itfauc Wmt FidA tvaRPsismsl — Ph amw Inspmioa of Uoiu ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS OR OTHER TESTS AND INSPECTIONS: h4iaQNW6Cf10NAWICYsFFMCDMPW t STRUCTURAL STEWWELDING: — S"Jc and Tea pia speeifr manbas blow j —Sbophfataid Wrnnfication —WCWwgInsixaion Oshop ❑Fidel —Dltraonklaspocdoo OSbop OFuld —Mtb-stcDtth Bolling Invocdom OShop OFicid DA325 Oswso9D ON Ox OF —Mein Dent Wabfiog Inspvc:eon — RamlachtgSwd l .W-g hsponion — NEW god Wiling haspwdm — Cotaam hasea waling lospWin, FIREPROOFING: — Phaxsax Inspaefion _ DaaityTm -76ialnessTesu hmpaa Hatching D ISIRATING CONCRETE: Sampic and Test —Pbttmcwhapeadon —Usk Weighu FILLMATERIAL: —Accera me Teas —n.am ca baya ion _ Held Dandy STRUCTURAL WOOD: — S6m WA manias inspection —ImapKdowofGa-mmFah. — YapeationolTrou 7oia Fab. _ staopk rail Tqs Camporca u Famcotnpicudby: .� rak: 602 Tak*ftNo: Date: 6 1 —Is 0 ?mod "may �l04114elltq•rpPlr� FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: rs,. Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: 176251301^ Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Sunny Subgrade Excavation File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-23 Report No: I Page: 1 of 2 Phone: 425-W1977 Visit: Evaluation, TESC Fax: 425-844-1987 RECe1V';? JRW Foudation Evaluation o 081�0 We were offite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evalq ieitai►on made for the planned foundation and evaluate erosion control offite. On arrival we observed that the contractor was in the process of excavating for the foundation subgrade at the site. The contractor informed us that he was approximately 5 feet low of subgrade elevation along the eastern side of the cut. He informed us that organic soils were encountered in this area, therefore continued downward with the excavation. The excavation in this area created an approximate 10 foot near vertical cut. We recommend that persons should not stand in this area until backfill is placed back within this area to reduce the excavation height. We were informed by the contractor that approximately 320 yards of material had been exported offsite. We met with Steve Bames offite to discuss foundation options in the area that the subgrade was 5 feet low of desired elevation. We discussed a taller foundation wall in this area. It is our opinion that the subgrade should be brought up high enough so that workers forming foundation walls will not be working near a tall excavation cut. We anticipate that a minimum of 4 feet of fill would be required in this area. In the central region of the subgrade excavation we were informed that the excavation is approximately 3 feet high of subgrade elevation. A test hole was excavated in this area to determine feasibility of subgrade soils to support footings. We probed the base of the excavation with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod penetrated approximately 12 to 18 inches in depth. We will need to evaluate the remainder of the excavated subgrade to determine uniformity of the subgrade soils and if they can be used to support the planned footings without overexcavation. In the western region of the subgrade excavation the contractor informed us that he was approximately 6 feet high of footing elevation. The contractor informed us that this area of the subgrade should be available for evaluation tomorrow. A return visit will be required to evaluate the subgrade soils for bearing capacity. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control. We did not observe soil or water leaving the site at this time. We recommend that silt fence be installed along the west side of Attachment: Distribution: Signed: SW I/4, NW IA, SEC. 05,1 SNOHOWS14 COUNP cr _ t _ %ii% // UJ o \ N . v...m3vwav�y AIL r:I - - ro t ssu IV 'am � Box Rl SETS .77 met o •fir, �. b OJ Isuu RE Aug os zoos � Es � j,i t ZI gU1LDING 4rs 24i mufrCanlc vuY CALL 48 HO'URS pa BEFORE YOU DIGb� 1-800-424-5555 .� ana a ncs sw n[ YYea a .c w,m m.rma . mrm. 1 M Oh O tlwOf .fi LnH Owl K YtM'u bAGY K �M M.IXWxw CO a�1H.-I rNunaYn�YaatinicNal.�alnn /RR Tbb RCT.b bF :RGi RRR7 /RGl /RGi FIELD REPORT Cornerstone project: 1 Geotechnical, Inc. owner: 17625130n Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425.844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Sunny Subgrade Excavation Evaluation File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-25 Report No: 2 Page: 1 of 2 By: JRW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating footing subgrade excavation. On arrival we observed that the contractor had moved excavated material from the area of the planned footing area to the north side the planned structure to bring the elevation for a planned patio in this area. Approximately 4 to 5 feet of material had been placed. Material consisted of silty fine sand with gravel and trace organics. We probed the in place soil with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod penetrated up to 2 feet in depth. The contractor informed us that approximately 3 feet of material was placed loose and was not compacted at this time. He plans to remove the material and recompac:t the material back in place. Minimal foundation excavation had occurred at the site and will be evaluated at a later date. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: RECEIVED AUG 0 8 2008 BUILDING r --s bm 'An"A ruu��in�o�unicN�uNn� /RgTbbgC7b bF :RA gRR7/RA/Rq / /�/ i / / //i/i' / /i /i/i•/ / • -/T �/ _ $W I/4.NW 1I4,SEC. 05.7 SNOHOMISH COUNT) ' / / / // / � / / / / auk / / / / //ii ✓,- ^_ � l - Zk sz // /'/i // /}-ice/ / �/�/j��✓// /�^ �� / ///i'/�/ �.�.- _ -/i' / i � i' //i Er /s1?7'�j"i' '��1-t �"=�='%'�, r--�� /�= _ t'-26•---- �/ / / "' � �/// z / / ///� \`t /ems.(--_•-, \ \vv\v3ivcrvnwm r /C/� /�/1 I �-222•-� I 1 ``` '.f � -� I w: 22�\\ — J f -: gp.aY.! Yq _Fa'xFj-in.zf7fi'KI (MM \ Z Aug oa1aoe OWN, N I&PA �NGI 8U11.D i` C 6 * 7 �� •� Ul YY CONYUQNOTF! CA48 HOURS ` BLL EAMR FORE YOU DIG p.xrx Po f�q Mf Ml YGtYr W 1-800-424-5555 r r6 rn L+F01WxS so ) �t,��Btl!i R en 9nHJ nIU`I�invnvunIcN-AiiNnn /AATbbAC7b bP:fn 8nn7./8n/8n FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project Lunds Gulch Road File No.: 2212 % Geotechnieal, Inca Owner: Ron Hilliard Date: 2008-7-30 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Report No: 3 Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Partly Cloudy Page: I of') Purpose of Subgrade Excavation RECEIVED Phone: 425-844-1977 Visit: Evaluation, TESC Fax: 425-844-1987 By. AUG j�k2008 BUILDING Subgrade Evaluation We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating footing subgrade and excavation cuts made within the structural footprint of the lot. On arrival we observed that the contractor was near completion for excavating down to footing subgrade elevation within the structural footprint. We probed the subgrade with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod did not penetrate more than 6 inches in depth along the northern approximate one- half of the foundation footprint. In the southern approximate one-half of the foundation footprint we were able to probe up to 3 feet in depth. Subgrade soils consisted of silty sand with gravel. It is our opinion that the northern half of the foundation footprint will support the desired 1,500 psf bearing capacity. The southern half of the foundation footprint will require a minimum overexcavation of 2 feet and backfill with a compactible granular material. Refer to site map for locations of footing subgrade evaluated. Excavation cuts were observed in the northeast comer of the excavation up to approximately 12 feet in height and appear to exists with a 4 foot vertical rut at the base, then 4 foot sloped at 1H:IV, then 4 feet near vertical to the top. In the southeast comer of the excavation we observed 5 foot vertical cuts with approximately 5 foot sloped cuts sloped at approximately 1H:1V. Along the southern side of the excavation we observed approximate 4 foot vertical cuts with stockpiled soil directly above the cut. The stockpiled soil was sloped at an approximate 1H:1 V slope. We recommend that the stockpiled material on south side of the excavation be covered with plastic before workers are allowed to access the excavation. Excavation cuts appear stable. It is our opinion that the excavation should be safe for worker access as long as the stockpiled material on the south side of the excavation is covered with plastic. Worker access should be suspended during or shortly after periods of heavy rainfall. The contractor indicated that the walls should be constructed and backfilled within 3 weeks which should be dry weather. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. The contractor had installed silt fence along the western property line and placed rock spalls west of the silt fence.'Y did not appear that Attachment: Signed: A—� Distribution: 1711. QM Mn"A Tuun'�in=natinicm-zixnn /RRTbbnG7b t1F:F,n 8007/B0/20 FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: �. , t�eotechnicalInc. owner: 176251301hAvenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Partly Cloudy Subgrade Excavation Evaluation, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-30 Report No: 3 Page: 2 of 3 By: JRW soils were leaving the site. We recommend that the stockpiled material on the south side of the site be covered with plastic. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: REcelveo wG 0 S 20 BUILDING )a '="A rtiunai mngw icN-4wNm L86rbD8SZV 7E:60 800Z/80/80 NW 1/4, SEC. 05. T. 27N SNOHOMLSH COUNTY, WA: / / /j /// i�/i/ /iJG i io• ///j///r _ RECEIVED .-------AUG 08 2008 UILDING .a,wFs/igjj-222 �iii,' 7:-fir _w1ie� :� �r.;T�., r �s -------\T-- Z. J`7y" CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 an ="A 111 w•�-r,.irin.0 fw" 1 M i,� V (MWif 4 ,2• 4 �� 1(QY6�•R Y CM u T IJ4,n�I n7l19Aln IG]I7AIp,nn /Qa TbbCC7b bC!rM CC,Q7/O(r/GC] KECEIVED FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: V4 Geotechnical, Inc. owner: 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Sunny Subgrade Excavation Evaluation, TESC AUG 21 2008 Date: 2008-7-23 Report No: 1 Page: 1 of 2 By: JRW Foudation Evaluation We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating excavation made for the planned foundation and evaluate erosion control onsite. On arrival we observed that the contractor was in the process of excavating for the foundation subgrade at the site. The contractor informed us that he was approximately 5 feet low of subgrade elevation along the eastern side of the cut. He informed us that organic soils were encountered in this area, therefore continued downward with the excavation. The excavation in this area created an approximate 10 foot near vertical cut. We recommend that persons should not stand in this area until backfill is placed back within this area to reduce the excavation height. We were informed by the contractor that approximately 320 yards of material bad been exported offsite. We met with Steve Barnes onsite to discuss foundation options in the area that the subgrade was 5 feet low of desired elevation. We discussed a taller foundation wall in this area. It is our opinion that the subgrade should be brought up high enough so that workers forming foundation walls will not be working near a tall excavation cut. We anticipate that a minimum of 4 feet of fill would be required in this area. In the central region of the subgrade excavation we were informed that the excavation is approximately 3 feet high of subgrade elevation. A test hole was excavated in this area to determine feasibility of subgrade soils to support footings. We probed the base of the excavation with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod penetrated approximately 12 to 18 inches in depth. We will need to evaluate the remainder of the excavated subgrade to determine uniformity of the subgrade soils and if they can be used to support the planned footings without overexcavation. In the western region of the subgrade excavation the contractor informed us that he was approximately 6 feet high of footing elevation. The contractor informed us that this area of the subgrade should be available for evaluation tomorrow. A return visit will be required to evaluate the subgrade soils for bearing capacity. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control. We did not observe soil or water leaving the site at this time. We recommend that silt fence be installed along the west side of the grop Attachment: Signed: Distribution: If u ;,. a 9 SNOHOM19H COUNTY, W► isL 4LA lG y&'I CALL 48 HOURS„ MMNJ M 014EMYlnL p BEFORE YOU DIG p a; 1-800-424-5555 s aov a MZ lose "® u Cornerstone ® Geotechnical, Inc. 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425-844-1977 Fax: 425-844-1987 FIELD REPORT Project: Lunds Gulch Road Owner: Ron Hilliard Location: Edmonds Weather: Sunny Purpose of Subgrade Excavation Visit: Evaluation File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-25 Report No: 2 Page: 1 of 2 By: 7RW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating footing subgrade excavation. On arrival we observed that the contractor had moved excavated material from the area of the planned footing area to the north side the planned structure to bring the elevation for a planned patio in this area. Approximately 4 to 5 feet of material had been placed. Material consisted of silty fine sand with gravel and trace organics. We probed the in place soil with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod penetrated up to 2 feet in depth. The contractor informed us that approximately 3 feet of material was placed loose and was not compacted at this time. He plans to remove the material and recompact the material back in place. Minimal foundation excavation had occurred at the site and will be evaluated at a later date. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: Gd � ma _ wsWi r CALL 48 HOUSS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 SW 114,NW 114, SEC. 05, T. /X ! SNOHONWH COUNTY, awa :vv d towtsis e 't* 2A#,IA6 Y WWWa MISAMMIR ovr. a.0 mw Auu wR+� Ivoa.�v M w�ro M uxvc a m.usK�u°ia A NFWY:OVI aA6gM W ' 69R� G GfII ILLK//I \4➢ U /tbNAN>Vt ({MIN: Al ona mwor sr a/» mAV Ie ANl9l mmwR _ m>�arurmsacma Cornerstone ® :_ Geotechnical, Inc. 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425-844-1977 Fax: 425-844-1987 Subgrade Evaluation FIELD REPORT Project: Lunds Gulch Road Owner: Ron Hilliard Location: Edmonds Weather: Partly Cloudy Purpose of Subgrade Excavation Visit: Evaluation, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-30 Report No: 3 Page: 1 of 3 Br. JRW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating footing subgrade and excavation cuts made within the structural footprint of the lot. On arrival we observed that the contractor was near completion for excavating down to footing subgrade elevation within the structural footprint. We probed the subgrade with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod did not penetrate more than 6 inches in depth along the northern approximate one- half of the foundation footprint. In the southern approximate one-half of the foundation footprint we were able to probe up to 3 feet in depth. Subgrade soils consisted of silty sand with gravel. It is our opinion that the northern half of the foundation footprint will support the desired 1,500 psf bearing capacity. The southern half of the foundation footprint will require a minimum overexcavation of 2 feet and backfill with a compactable granular material. Refer to site map for locations of footing subgrade evaluated. Excavation cuts were observed in the northeast comer of the excavation up to approximately 12 feet in height and appear to exists with a 4 foot vertical cut at the base, then 4 foot sloped at 1H:1 V, then 4 feet near vertical to the top. In the southeast comer of the excavation we observed 5 foot vertical cuts with approximately 5 foot sloped cuts sloped at approximately 1HIV. Along the southern side of the excavation we observed approximate 4 foot vertical cuts with stockpiled soil directly above the cut. The stockpiled soil was sloped at an approximate 1H:1 V slope. We recommend that the stockpiled material on south side of the excavation be covered with plastic before workers are allowed to access the excavation. Excavation cuts appear stable. It is our opinion that the excavation should be safe for worker access as long as the stockpiled material on the south side of the excavation is covered with plastic. Worker access should be suspended during or shortly after periods of heavy rainfall. The contractor indicated that the walls should be constructed and backfilled within 3 weeks which should be dry weather. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. The contractor had installed silt fence along the western property line and placed rock spalls west of the silt fence. it did not appear that Attachment: Signed: Distribution: FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: ® Geotechnical, Inc. Owner. 17625 1301h Avenue NE C102 Location. Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Partly Cloudy Subgrade Excavation Evaluation, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-7-30 Report No: 3 Page: 2 of 3 By: JRW soils were leaving the site. We recommend that the stockpiled material on the south side of the site be covered with plastic. Attachment: Signed: Distribution: a --Fw,� CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIC 1-800-424-5555 SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASH FIELD REPORT Cornerstone ' Geotechnical, Inc. Project: 17625130m Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Phone: 425-844-1977 Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Weather: Sunny Purpose of Subgrade Evaluation Visit: File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-9-3 Report No: 4 Page: 1 of 2 By: CPC We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating footing subgrade and excavation cuts made within the structural footprint of the lot. We had been on site previously and identified that the southern portion of the excavation was underlain by loose material and would require a few feet or so of overexcavation. We visited the site twice today. At the time of our first visit, a survey crew was on site laying out the comers of the south side of the structure. We probed the area and were able to probe about 12 to 18 inches below subgrade. The contractor informed us that the subgrade was on the order of 6 to 12 inches low already. We therefore recommended that the excavation be taken 2 feet below bottom of footing. The resulting excavation should be compacted with structural fill. The spall access road was being excavated in search of the sewer stub. The result was a mixture of rock spalls and on site soils, with the majority of the material being spalls. We recommended that this material be used as footing backfill and new, non -contaminated material be used to re-establish the driveway. The rockspall/soil mixture could be tamped into place. At the time of our second visit the overexcavation and backfilling was completed. The edges of the overexcavation area was observed to evaluate depth of overexcavation. By probing these area, it appears that the 2 feet of overexcavation recommended was completed as recommended. We then probed the spalusoil fill. The material probed dense and in our opinion is suitable for support of the structure as recommended in our geotechnical report. We have attached a drawing of the area we observed today. Attachment: Distribution: Signed- " RECEIVED SEP 12 2008 BUILDING DEFT. ioo.if \ n s rrm (r rW CALL 48 HOURS BEFORE YOU DIG 1-800-424-5555 SNOHOMISHCOUNTY, I zz6'--- ��/ inR I I /� w.air L8� qU i� �Rmm♦cmmmc�mt�m� ♦ / W I I ' � � fM.12 p O ♦\ J u r ++ ♦♦ �vmvm♦!v�♦vv♦vv� X ! - ri r� • i.ir(rncr RECEIVED FIELD REPORT c.-P 2 21008 BUILDING Project: Lunds Gulch Road File No.: 2212 Cornerstone ®'Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Ron Hilliard Date: 2008-9-11 17625130th Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Report No: 5 Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Sunny Page: 1 of 2 Purpose of Excavation Volumes, TESC Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 By: 7RW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating excavation cut volumes and erosion control. Cut Volumes We observed that foundation footings and walls were being constructed throughout the lot. We evaluated excavation cuts within the site to determine total cut volumes. We were provided with a plan sheet from Robert Pusey, PLS of Pacific Geomatic Services, Inc. titled "Excavtion Sections for Ron Hilliard, Lunds Gulch Road" that show cross section of existing ground and house excavation elevations for the planned structure. The plans indicate that 382 cubic yards of material were cut at the site. We evaluated grade stakes on the east side of the planned structure and grades appear similar to those on the provided cross section. On the west side of the structure, excavation configurations in the field did not match those of the provided cross section. It appeared that the field grade continued horizontally from the footing elevation to the downward slope on the west side of the site, whereas cross sections showed a vertical cut extending upwards from footing elevation, near footings, to existing ground. We calculated additional cut volumes observed in the field as being 83 cubic yards. Total cut volume was calculated to be 465 cubic yards. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. We observed that silt fence in the northwest region had been knocked down and soils were topping the silt fence. The silt fence should be repaired. We also observed that minor to moderate trackout in the southwest region of the site in the area of a catchbasin located in this comer. The catchbasin should have a silt sock installed and the road should be swept in this area. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: EPDXY INSTALLATION I GEOTEST SERVICES, INC. REPORT 741 Marine Drive, Bellingham, WA 98225 Phone: 360.733.7318 Fax: 360.733.7418 20611 -67th Ave. NE, Unit A, Arlington, WA 98223 PROJECT: Hilliard Residence JOB #: 08-0779 ADDRESS: 15515 75th Place W, Edmonds, WA REPORT #: C1 CLIENT Greenwalk Development DATE: 11-14-08 CONTRACTOR: Greenwalk Development PAGE M 1 of 1 WEATHER: Cloudy,550 PERMIT#: INSPECTOR: KR Item(s) Inspected ILocation 7/8" anchor bolts for hold-downs (PHD6) - 8 holes 12nd floor - E wail, HD-3 7/8" anchor bolts for hold-downs -1 hole I N wall. HD-3 718" anchor bolts for hold-downs - 3 holes Foundation - HD-4 Base plate - 4 holes, I" dia. bar 12nd floor - S base plate, 4-S6 I Braces -12 holes - #4 rebar I W side on S2 - braces for deck beams II I Reference Drawings: 3, 4, 5, 6/S8, 8/S7 II Items Inspected I Comments Substrate Condition Good Hole Cleaned w/ Air ® Yes Hole Cleaned w/ Brush M Iyes Hole Diameter O 1-114" Hole Depth O Varies AnchorldnsertType M Threaded RodlRebar AnchorMsert Diameter ® Varies Projection Length Okay Epoxy Type Simpson ET221Simpson Set Pac EZ Date ICSO Evaluation Report # 1 ;0 ICC ES-ER-4945RCC-ES-ESR-1772 The above items were conforming O nonconforming(3 conforming except as noted below Comments: All hole diameters were 1-1/4"- need engineers approval. Base plate embedment depth (12', 6-1/24 2@57 and hole diameters did not conform. Base plate did not properly seat - need engineers approval. No detail for braces -#4 rebar cut in some locations. Embedment depth was 4' to 7. Contractor was informed of inspection results. Copies: Client RECEIVED Nov 17 2001 BUILDING DEPT. Submitted -GooT,etwel oat be hold,npm"Ibleft layout of ombed, Wdlor,Ydcbre em,nebne and bead., This o,wx d,al nether"wduced oaeeptln full, wNhoWd,awdtb, WP M0IGonT4at89rAC",lee. a ooeosna„ro.wour< FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: 176251309, Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425.844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Cloudy Foundation Evaluation, Slab Subgrade, Tree Removal on Slope, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-10-15 Report No: 6 Page: 1 of? By: JRW Two visits were made onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating foundations for the catchment wall in the southeast region of the site and east footing lines, slab subgrades, clearing of trees on the steep slope on the east side of the site and erosion control. Foundation Subgrades On a morning visit we observed that the contractor had begun excavating down to footing elevation for the planned catchment wall located in the southeast region of the site. Excavation depth was approximately 2 to 3 feet on the west side of the cut and up to 5 feet on the east side of the cut. We probed the subgrade with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod did not penetrate more than 4 inches in depth. Subgrade soils consisted of native silty sand With gravel. On an afternoon visit we observed that the contractor had excavated down approximately 4 feet below the footing elevation for the planned key for the catchment wall. The excavation was approximately 12 inches wide. We probed the base and walls of the key cut and the probe rod did not penetrate more than 3 inches in depth. The excavation appeared to have been made in medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel. It is our opinion that the footing subgrade will support the planned catchment wall. We also probed the footing subgrade for the walls along the upper tier on the south and east sides of the foundation footprint. The probe rod penetrated up to approximately 5 inches in depth. Foundation subgrade soils consisted of silty sand with gravel. The contractor informed us that approximately 5 feet of fill was placed in one foot lifts and compacted with a jumping jack. As long as the contractor used consistent methods and materials, it is our opinion that the foundation will provide the designed 1500 psf bearing capacity for the footings along the upper tier in the south and east regions of the structure. Slab Subgrade We also evaluated slab subgrade within the interior of the foundation footprint. In the northern region of the footprint we were able to probe up to 12 inches in depth with the first 6 inches probing moderately easy and the bottom 6 inches requiring moderate effort. We informed the contractor that 6 inches of material should be stripped out before placement of gravel for capillary break. In the central to southern region of the footprint, the probe rod did not penetrate more than 6 inches in depth. We did observe some wet surface soils that were disturbed from foot traffic in this region. We informed the contractor that these disturbed areas should be stripped out. The contractor informed uat/ ouulld remove wet Attachment: Signed: Distribution: RES V B DEC - 4 2,93 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: ®=�� Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: 176251301^ Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Cloudy Foundation Evaluation, Slab Subgrade, Tree Removal on Slope, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-10-15 Report No: 6 Page: 2 ofA By: JRW disturbed areas then place a minimum of 6 inches of gravel for capillary break over the prepared subgrade. We informed the contactor that clean gravel should be used for capillary break, containing less than 5 percent fines. Steep Slope Clearing The contractor had also cut down large trees that were leaning on the steep slope to the east of the site. Small bushes and vegetation remained on the slope. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. We observed that silt fence in the northwest region had been knocked down and soils were topping the silt fence. The silt fence should be repaired. We also observed that minor to moderate trackout in the southwest region of the site in the area of a catchbasin located in this corner. The catchbasin should have a silt sock installed and the road should be swept in this area. We also recommend that at least two inches of straw be placed around the perimeter of the structure and on the steep slope in the east side of the slope where soils were exposed from tree removal. Attachment: Signed: Distribution: It �I f®®r�ow�eoer�nie FIELD REPORT Project: Lunds Gulch Road Cornerstone ® I Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Ron Hilliard 17625130th Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Partly Cloudy Purpose of TESC Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-10-21 Report No: 7 Page: 1 of 1 We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating erosion control within the site. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. We observed that silt fence had been reestablished in the western and southern region of the site. The silt fence appeared to have been adequately embedded. Approximately 2 inches of straw had been placed over exposed soils within the site including the steep slope area to the east of the site. On the east side of the site the contractor had placed clean 5/8a'inch gravel between the silt fence and 75`h Place West. Seventy Fifth PI and the driveway to the south of the site had been swept clean and a silt sock had been installed within the catchbasin at the southwest comer of the site. It appears that the contractor has adequately installed erosion control B1v1P's within the site and the site soils appear stable in regards to erosion. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: RES(j DEC - 4 2608 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS RECEIVED Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc, Project: ;/frF.A411 Permit G�7 21r � Site BMPs NOV 12 2008 BUILDING DEPT. Lott -0lt1 Inspects Overall Need Condition Repair? Date /v .1/lc'B G=Good F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits .Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance G F P Y • Stabilized roads/parking area G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates .Swale G F P Y N J *Dike G F P Y N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls *Sediment pond4rap G F P Y [� •Silt fence P F P Y (�U •Straw bale barriers G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils a , .. < cs •Nets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch F P Y *Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes ^v(vL/aunt •Terrace- ' F P Y N R L�/drt `! Pipe gigqpe drains G F P Y N F P Y • G F P. Y N Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts f P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N *Energy disslpators G F P- Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N *Concrete handling og, F P Y • G F P Y N Control De -watering /L/ 4,4- • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: II ';,-AA5 Permit No. e�c� -6/( 1nspectorQVALJ/'-Date % /7//61 Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES OP . IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the followina table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES,9Q— If ves, record results below: IV Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES d&i If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the 'Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: vi Q_b by: (print+signature) Title/Qualification of Inspector: 61%5C (: %o1-G64'-7 Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES d&i If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the 'Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: vi Q_b by: (print+signature) Title/Qualification of Inspector: 61%5C (: %o1-G64'-7 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. RECEIVED N O V 12 2008 /:�� 1�f� BUILDING DEPT. Project: Ili t,.-rA Permit No.96=1-0117 Inspector Jr- 6-�v e Date Z' A)« _ Overall Need G=Good F=Falr P=Poor Yes N=No Site BMps Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads �i (c *Stabilized site entrance F P Y � c le& ^ *Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y dsV • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N •Dike G F P Y N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N •Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls • Sediment pon&1rap G F P Y N •Siltfence F P Y (D *Straw bale barriers G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils *Nets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch 19 F P Y Q �p�oSc�C s�fr *Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace Wipe slo a drains G G F F P P Y Y N N • /wlv G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts G F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N A lt,4- •Energydisslpators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N *Concrete handling F P Y /(a) • G F P Y `( Control De -watering N /� • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: ermit No. ,"Wil— 4 7 Inspector,.-)( Date // Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: H Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: / Jr! Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. /,t/o A svL � { Was water quality monitoring part of this Inspection? YES R If yes, record results below: IH YMM" tube, meter, laboratory NTU •p _ 1 • pH scale P K+ wJxi<r� Are non-compliance Incidents evident? YES If yes, indicate tasks necessary to brin Ite into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: it i7(J'Z by: Title/Qualification of Inspector: CEs6 (print+signature)5C 7�� y7 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. rX,4to _f Project: ; #14P � c Permit No.209 ON1 Inspector T(,)&k Date ki !�}z� Overall Need G=Good F=Fair P=PoorY=Yee N=No Site BMPs Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas i P F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads •Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roada/parking area F P Y • G f P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale •Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N DEC - 4 2 •Sedimentpond G F P Y N BUILDING D •Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond4rap G F P Y N •Siltlence @ F P Y •Sfrawbola barriers G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Solis •Nets and blankets F P Y N *mulch a F P Y 49 •Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes aK�iNfi• arcf ,� r r •Terrace •P/ sfopedrains G G F F P P Y Y N N l,✓est �/oe A o G ArcLofrcf, d-AR sf fr�ie-t •P/40,G <•✓r(- G ® P N /4 t. rr"'tf ldvergt C✓�tt. • 144,4at. F P Y ®19 /c- l I C, >`vcfa . Protect Drain Inlets JAlpfc. df ^O+ p?r�(w� �e •Mserts G© P Cp N ke O/r/in� 7%avc, h W • G F P Y N $ocle, IZV "bL • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels -• G F P Y N *Energy dissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N /v114 *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N M 08 W -104 P14C Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. aJ 0 Project: #i Itt iJAPermit No.9-WI-0II.7 Inspector .i;# 9111 Date 111tJ11 Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed?SE N IF YES. list the action items to be completed on the followinn tahla- Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Inlfials �. o% Gfio na I• c W„F cfl`o af u- V h4- 0 A -Ili c 2. { &cc C KZP, 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection:0111 4,--H,, C(vJa. ,Q:��t*S/Ir�c� 0,Q ;�cics �cip lt(l 2`f hvL�s Describe discharging stormwater, If present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness°, discoloration, or oil sheen. Was water quality monitoring part of this Inspection? YES�� If ves, record results below. . RECEIVED DEC - 4 2008 BUILDING DEPT. non-compliance Incidents evident?CYE,,WNO If yes, indicate tasks necessary to tifing site Into compliance on the °Actions to be Completed" table above, and Include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES Nra If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES% Inspection completed on: / 3 fi by: (print+signature) Jl- jt Tltle/QualMatlon of Inspector. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. rper I �L— ® --e Project: . tA"I&IPermitNo)-M8-0/171nspectoF,l(rrde-Date Le}'-r Overall Need G=Good F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Site BMPs Condition Repair? CommentsiObservations Clearing Limits •Buffer Zones around senslfbm areas. F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads Wlete •Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized mads"rking area G 4f,>, P a N • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N RECE� *Dike G F P Y N A /�� •Sedimentpond G F P Y N /v DEC - 4 .Sediment trap G F P Y N BUILDING • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls *Sediment pondRrap F P Y N •Silt fence F P Y - �r •St lybetsbarriers 4ff•C G G F P F (Lfi,29V Y N N w J✓P� sir kp. t' �aS�4c • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch P Y •Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N oPlba slope drains /�rfiiC12 G F P Y N • F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets t&c c 5 ft- Sor /c •Inserts G (g P Ar-, N �;,tf JA) (d-rrv,: C..f S rat 61�1�•� Gt/cacr • G F P Y N/iP� Stabilize Channels and outlets •Conveyance channels G F P Y N •Energydissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N ��f} •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N ED T68 )EPT. Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. W Project: "llrAl-Afl-16 Permit No.99/0 $-6i(inspector `1c RA4 Date /t h4/6-7 Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed?Sj'E�NO IF YES, list the action items to be comnleted on the following table - Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials ,. 54t(< (� -( CO 2. IA w , loc . ,-E 3. j/ C Y rc ✓c ( -1 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: c/ pre C,p 4;-ii Cc A,rf /'f/om. s Ul% / y Describe discharging stormwater, If present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. �d RECEIVED Was water quality monitoring part of this Inspection? YES, DEC - 4 2008 If vas. record results below: BUILDING DEPT. non-compliance Incidents evident? ENO If yes, Indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and Include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED1 ii�0 If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YESL If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES Inspection completed on: 846 Of by: (print+signature ��tl)t Gr f7/��-- Title/Qualification of Inspector: t'G SG L ? d.4 0 6L-7 -C;or nerstone Geotechnical, Inc. r-/tAr3 -J Project: ,/fiarA Permit C6- Site BMPs ZWg"a I/ 71nspecti Overall Need Condition Repair? od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas VF P Y • G F P Y N RECEIVED • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads VEC 1 1 20g8 *Stabilizedsite entrance F P Y *Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y BUILDING DEPT. • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale *Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N •Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond/trap G F P Y N •Silt fence P Y *Straw bale barriers • A/4rI-, C, G G F F P � Y N N CJvbr S*(- J r�� h-L • G F P Y N ,!. Cop Vie t� AP, Pk ( • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch P Y •Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes .Terrace G F P Y N Pipe slope drains G F P Y N • f &s k. c F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts G �P N 1 /� ar /f s,fz t `f /e S ei • G F P Y N r • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N , /( *Energy dissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N N *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N -Canerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: 111lu.A&� Permit No" og-o+(7lnspectorTi-),.,1�Date Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed O IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials c :/ '<UcA 2. J./!.,- i 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: „ C 6�r5 Pe a Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. �U vQ�s�^G�S� Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES If ves, record results below: • 's _ tu a, meter, laboratory i� r, kit, meter, lab it -pH scale Pape y, `7 -p�aca: Are non-compliance incidents evident? OYE NO If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the 'Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES qi5p— If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES Inspection completed on: �� by: (print+signature) Title/Qualification of Inspector: % SCL- 276o6 ;- % CFM HEATING & COOLING, INC. AIR OUTLET — TEST REPORT 17425 68T" Ave NE Kenmore, Washington 98028 Phone: 425-481-3471 Fax: 425-483-9671 Project: R $ C HN.A.C. System or Unit: Location Outlet Manufacturer: AREA SERVED No. OUTLET TYPE SIZE DESIGN CFM PRELIMINARY CFM FINAL CFM o p Z a �o Sd Z� FOP- 140 0 140 � S r 20 3 / O NOTES: TEST DATE: I f- 4- al READINGS BY: apk i, T PAGE OF -Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. rIZ A 13 Project:# /fi4fcA Permit C6-#-- 10--� Site BMPs 11 Condition Repair? liu.(ebate j /_y 10I od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas • G F F P P Y Y N RECEIVED • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads UEC 1 1 2008 *Stabilized site entrance F P Y *Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y BUILDING DEPT. • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale *Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N� Ji— •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sediment pondRrap G F P Y N •Silt fence P Y *Straw bale barriers • '114ef %c, G G F F P �% Y N N —=ytlrtis ' • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch < VF P Y *Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N Pipe slope drains G F P Y N •�tf•c F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets •inserts G 4�PP T2 N v_ • G F P Y N ` • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets •Conveyance channels G F P Y N *Energy dissipators G F P Y N !" • G F P Y N Control Pollutants /— •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N N . •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering 0 G F P Y N �;ornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: Permit Nod-oO9 -01r7inspector7 "k✓r-lzDate Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed O /F YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. C /A(t ; 2. i 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: t (�rS `lrc c �c.d�tns�fG-hU� Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. e' % � �SC� oq C_ Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES If yes, record results below: NO q_paper, k1l meter, lab pH scale i Are non-compliance incidents evident? �CW NO If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept of Ecology? YES If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES Inspection completed on: �� l �by: (print+signature) Title/Qualification of Inspector: C % SGL. -72-6cj(, X 7 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. `0 Project: "/rrr tf Permit Site 13MPs 008-0117 Inspectc Overall Need Condition Repair? it nnta A F=Fair P=Poor Y--Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N A *Dike G F P Y N •Sedlmentpond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls • Sediment pondRrap G F P Y N ED •Slit fence G F P Y 4i RECE►V •Stryv bale barriers • J7c XC G G(V F P P Y Y `fi DEC 3 1 2008 DEPT. G F P Y N BUILDING Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch F P Y *Seeding G F P Y ING F P Y G F P Y Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N Wipe slope drains G F P Y N • f/�lt• c P Y • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets •Inserts P Y • G F P Y N • G F .P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N/ •Energydissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N/ *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering N / • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. -�11 Project: f �� i A4Permit No.-UO�`d It7lnspectorXY0&-fit Date X ;-IJ-9 Will exis ing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES Nit IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: A, S-k- i S�rGif � Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. /"% &A(,rc, �f-c Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES 65?� If yes, record results below: 0-paper, ldt, meter, lab -pli-scale �2%-i�l Are non-compliance incidents evident? O If yes, indicate tasks necessary to rin ite into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: A/r yid by: (print+signature r-h V&, C Title/Qualification of Inspector: Cr Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. `i ,_:, Project: fW14-A Permit Site BMPs Overall Need Condition Repair? rim l od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=t Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area G P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N *Dike G F P Y N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpon&Trap G F P Y N ;ZECEIVED •Silt fence F P Y *Straw bale barriers F P Y DEC 3 1 2006 • G F P Y N • G F P Y N BUILDING DEPT. • G F P V N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Solis •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch F P Y *Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Tefface G F P Y N •Pipe slope drains G F P Y N •Ma/CA^ F P Y • F P Y Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts t n GCS L•� �W • G F P Y N • G F .P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N •Energydissipators G F P Y N N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: ilia-v� Permit No. Z001-01'7Inspector POde Date � Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installedNO IF YES. list the action items to be completed on the fnlinwinn tahla- AcBto be Completed Date Completed/ons Initials r o l k •. LAK 0C,C,ir,� C-4-d tvn 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: K,10 J Z iwLfS P/-'";P S' ^cc INS* r ^ r1ie&*1,- Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. C'1-sG,(., ws-c Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES If yes, record results below: i s. tube,meter, laboratoryNTU Are non-compliance incidents evident?< Sr O If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actlons to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES. If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES Imo_ Inspection completed on: 043110 by: (print+signature JC SIC W_✓ Title/Qualification of Inspector: C sGL W-G 0 y1 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. ftl Project: 6,11,4r-d Permit G I Site BMPs Noah -0117 inspector,eYWv/CDate //W09 Overall Need G=Gcod F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *BufferZones around sensitive areas F P Y �l V • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads •Stablltzed site entrance F P Y *Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y CbD • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates •Swale G F P Y N •Dike G F P Y N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N �( *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •SedlmentpondArap G F P Y N RECEIVED •Silt fence F P Y •Straw bale barriers F P Y JAN 16 2009 • G F P Y N • G F P Y N DEVEIDIRMENTSEIWIGESCTR. • G F P Y N CnY OF Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils *Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch V F P Y *Seeding G F P Y N 0/0/c.<ft §2F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N •Pipe slope drains G F P Y N • r.1✓(�.� F P Y 0 • /�T1-� F P Y Q Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N •Energydissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N .Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: Permit No.9014 -0It7lnspector c4fwt-1t Date �g�d Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YE: 1F YES list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: y f t-(g 41 ? � �I" "—S Q�JO r(,L,5 n�O 1/v�Pi Si ref �ajr rnf/k d f 0,/%G•,` e F f(-A Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, `cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES ga- If yes, record results below: n4.� s,.-...IN -i-L s........r Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES•JSd, If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the °Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. . If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: �/� 1 by: (print+signature)je Title/Qualification of Inspector: CESG G 74-�b4 >"7 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: "/fw1AAs Permit Site BMPs -all 7 Condition Repair? j 7109 Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance ZGD F P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area C F P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates •Swale G F P Y N •Dike G F P Y N „ //� •Sedimentpond G F P Y N /A •Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond4rap G F P Y N RECEIVED *Silt fence F P Y *Straw bate barriers P Y JAN 212009 • G F P Y N 8ES M • G F P Y N OeALOPPN� • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils Wets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch P Y •Seeding F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N *Pipe slope drains G F P Y N �v v F P Y • �h(}i�(iV F P Y Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts G F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N •Energydisslpators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering r✓ • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: rmit No.o';06*9-1�// ? InspectorJ 9U(-fit Date / 1710 Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the followino table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: f / _S, /,rc /&C/- �'—&C, . Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. ,Ivd A'TC Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES 192, If ves, record results below: kWi'Jr-Rk-3&5 tube-, meter, laboratory NTU Are non-compliance Incidents evident? YES If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: Z&7101 by: (print+signature) %vie Title/Qualification of Inspector: Caf a_ �oz(66l% Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project:. ermit Site BMPs (P$ -OI17 Inspectors e 94)1-11 Date /A-1//6 Overall Need G=Good F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=t` Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits •Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads Sr ie<f0 �5^t= • Stabilized site entrance •Stabilized roadoarking area G F �v P P Y N i • . G F P Y N Control Flow Rates •Swale •Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N ,IL/IA •Sedimentpond G F P Y N •Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond4rap G F P Y N •Silt fence F P Y •Straw bate barriers F P Y • G- F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils Wets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch F P Y dDRECEIVED •Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N JAN 2 6 2009 Protect Slopes pEyp.ppMEltrSEFMCES GM • Terrace G F P Y N CITY OF EOMONDS •Pipe slope drains G F P Y N .�l�ff"i�c • /w(v�.etV F P P Y Y Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts G <LP_F P Y UL • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N *Energy dissipators G F P Y N N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering N 0 0 G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: Permit PermitNo.;7W!9''°1t'7 Inspector je�Date / L/��i Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed?(: £p NO IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed! Initials 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: % e /-/ ll 17 Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. / v J 4.14' rC1% u i' t Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES If yes, record results below: TIWARMP meter, laboratory NTU paper, k1t, meterlab pH scale Are non-compliance incidents evident?!��E"0 If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES�9 If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES Inspection completed on: by: (print+signaturea( Title/Qualification of Inspector: FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: Lunds Gulch Road j Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Ron Hilliard 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Partly Cloudy Purpose of TESC Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-10-21 Report No: 7 Page: I of 1 By: JRW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating erosion control within the site. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. We observed that silt fence had been reestablished in the western and southern region of the site. The silt fence appeared to have been adequately embedded. Approximately 2 inches of straw had been placed over exposed soils within the site including the steep slope area to the east of the site. On the east side of the site the contractor had placed clean 5/81' inch gravel between the silt fence and 75a' Place West. Seventy Fifth PI and the driveway to the south of the site had been swept clean and a silt sock had been installed within the catchbasin at the southwest comer of the site. It appears that the contractor has adequately installed erosion control BMP's within the site and the site soils appear stable in regards to erosion. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: RECEIVED O C T Z 9 2008 BUILDING DEPT. FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: Geotechnical, Inc. ' Owner: 176251301h Avenue NE C102 Location: Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Purpose of Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 Lunds Gulch Road Ron Hilliard Edmonds Cloudy Foundation Evaluation, Slab Subgrade, Tree Removal on Slope, TESC File No.: 2212 Date: 2008-10-15 Report No: 6 Page: 1013 By: 7RW Two visits were made onsite on behalf of our client for the purpose of evaluating foundations for the catchment wall in the southeast region of the site and east footing lines, slab subgrades, clearing of trees on the steep slope on the east side of the site and erosion control. Foundation Subgrades On a morning visit we observed that the contractor had begun excavating down to footing elevation for the planned catchment wall located in the southeast region of the site. Excavation depth was approximately 2 to 3 feet on the west side of the cut and up to 5 feet on the east side of the cut. We probed the subgrade with a half inch diameter steel probe rod and the probe rod did not penetrate more than 4 inches in depth. Subgrade soils consisted of native silty sand with gravel. On an afternoon visit we observed that the contractor had excavated down approximately 4 feet below the footing elevation for the planned key for the catchment wall. The excavation was approximately 12 inches wide. We probed the base and walls of the key cut and the probe rod dial not penetrate more than 3 inches in depth. The excavation appeared to have been made in medium dense to dense silty sand with gravel. It is our opinion that the footing subgrade will support the planned catchment wall. We also probed the footing subgrade for the walls along the upper tier on the south and east sides of the foundation footprint. The probe rod penetrated up to approximately 5 inches in depth. Foundation subgrade soils consisted of silty sand with gravel. The contractor informed us that approximately 5 feet of fill was placed in one foot lifts and compacted with a jumping jack. As long as the contractor used consistent methods and materials, it is our opinion that the foundation will provide the designed 1500 psf bearing capacity for the footings along the upper tier in the south and east regions of the structure. Slab Subgrade We also evaluated slab subgrade within the interior of the foundation footprint. In the northern region of the footprint we were able to probe up to 12 inches in depth with the first 6 inches probing moderately easy and the bottom 6 inches requiring moderate effort. We informed the contractor that 6 inches of material should be stripped out before placement of gravel for capillary break. In the central to southern region of the footprint, the probe rod did not penetrate more than 6 inches in depth. We did observe some wet surface soils that were disturbed from foot traffic in this region. We informed the contractor that these disturbed areas should be stripped out. The contractor informed It/ 1ould remove wet Attachment: Sig Distribution: RECEIVED 9 2008 BUILDING DEPT. FIELD REPORT CornerstoneProject: Lunds Gulch Road File No.: 2212 Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Ron Hilliard Date: 2008-10-15 17625130t^ Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Report No: 6 Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Cloudy Page: 2 of; Purpose of Foundation Evaluation, Slab Phone: 425-844-1977 Visit: Subgrade, Tree Removal on Slope, TESC Fax: 425-844-1987 By: JRW disturbed areas then place a minimum of 6 inches of gravel for capillary break over the prepared subgrade. We informed the contactor that clean gravel should be used for capillary break, containing less than 5 percent fines. Steep Slope Clearing The contractor had also cut down large trees that were leaning on the steep slope to the east of the site. Small bushes and vegetation remained on the slope. TESC We walked the site to evaluate erosion control measures implemented. We observed that silt fence in the northwest region had been knocked down and soils were topping the silt fence. The silt fence should be repaired. We also observed that minor to moderate trackout in the southwest region of the site in the area of a catchbasin located in this corner. The catchbasin should have a silt sock installed and the road should be swept in this area. We also recommend that at least two inches of straw be placed around the perimeter of the structure and on the steep slope in the east side of the slope where soils were exposed from tree removal. Attachment: Signed: Distribution: ^4 sHim1 FW RM PLM :i r- 1% 4 t i HI C'nPNJr P[Tnf lr Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. I Project: /% `tiA 91 Permit !6 #fXta, Site BMPs WO`f .- d It 7 Inspectc Overall Need Condition Repair? 9 A-kDate 30 ;od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N= Comments/Observations Clearing Limits *Buffer Zones around sensitive areas PF P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads •Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates •Swale G F P Y N *Dike G F P Y N y� •Sediment pond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond4rap G F P Y N •Siltfence F P Y • Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Solis *Nets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch <OF P Y cht RECEIVED *Seeding G F P Y N • G F P Y N FEB - 61009 • G F P Y N Protect Slopes Cm,01P13 �M NSM: •Terrace G F P Y N •Pipe slope drains G F P Y N •r 4-c F P Y O)Q-L F P Y Cid- Protect Drain Inlets •Inserts P Y • G F .P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N •Energydissipators G F P Y N G F P Y N Con• trol Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering 36 G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. 0J Project: Permit No.,'°d $-0/17 Inspector) G1- tc Date % /'JdA Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YE IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the followma table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials t. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: 6Ve,, .S-E , ylvttc S, VC cd(d'n Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. �0 cd Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES AD_ If yes, record results below: f lab n-compliance Incidents evident? YE If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: W_V/'09 by: (print+signature) c M (C % ' ` - Title/Qualification of Inspector: (6,ft4 790W Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: � � Permit No "�/17 Inspector,)C �f�"� Date �16'l09 Overall Need G=Good F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Site BMPs Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits •Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance F P Y *Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N •Dike G F P Y N mil/ •Sediment pond G F P Y N •Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls *Sediment pond4rap G F P Y N •Siitfence F P Y *Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils REC Wets and blankets G F P Y N •Mulch F P Y 2009G FEB 1100977 *Seeding G F F P P Y Y IN EpN94CEG CnY OF F P Y Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N *Pipe slope drains G F P Y N •/q/atuc. (A,., F P Y • ✓ G F P Y Protect Drain Inlets •inserts . F P Y AV • G F P Y *99 • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets •Conveyance channels G F P Y N A •Energydissipators G F P Y N /1// • G F P Y N Control Pollutants •Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N *Concrete handling G F P Y N • IG F P I Y N Control De -watering �� • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: ffP /1(4cC Permit No. )z0l'0/t 7 Inspector c I-P "te Date ;2- Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES( IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the followina table - Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: �(� 0 Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. d Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YE� If yes, record results below: v NTU u •[ja'' .... ii:?�'�f`s3t :yak .. - . • • - - Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES jOJ_ If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the °Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: ?` / 6 109 by: (print+signature) N Title/Qualification of Inspector: C Fi i(L 7-60 0 6 )�7 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: �/C-14 3PermitNoo'AV-01/%I Anspect( Ce 09--I-(J— Overall Need Site BMPs Condition Repair? Q'wl,/<Date-//31a od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits •Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads •Stabilized site entrance P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale *Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentponditp G F P Y N •Silt fence F P Y 49, *Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch V F P Y •Sealing G F P Y N • &H c F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N *Pipe slope drains • /uSfi G F F P P Y Y N �✓ e, F P YRECEIVE Protect Drain Inlets .Inserts F P Y FEB 23 2009 • G F P Y N • G F P I Y N g NiSWCESCTR Stabilize Channels and Outlets •Conveyance channels G F P Y N d *Energy dissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N /14- •Concrete handling G F P Y N 1,1 • G F P Y N Control De -watering • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. St;'1 'l Project: i `c.� Permit No. POf-brt7lnspector_ W4,/Date -2, IIJAl Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES-( IF YES, list the action items to be comDleted on the followinc table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: �i t17, �'(b-%t Q 3 1%eec p . ' / /�cc Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YESc_ If ves, record results below: If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: 2(t3 j07 b not+si nature f_I`- �" p p Y� (P � 9 ) Title/Qualification of Inspector: C��(✓L ��'ia j 7 Cornerstone '/%%L --ff- Geotechnical, Inc. V Project: % It' W&iAfPermit Site UPS (7 %o Overall Need G=Good F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N4 Condition Repair? Comments/Observations Clearing Limits i •Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads *Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area 3 F P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale •Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N �— •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •SedimentpondRrap G F P Y N •Slit fence F P Y *Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils RECEIVED *Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch F P Y 0 FEB 23 2009 •SIIn G F P Y N •/"1 r F P Y OEV13DWE (T SERVICE CM • G F P Y N CITY OF E)MONDS Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N *Pipe slope drains G F P Y N • F P Y • F P Y Protect Drain Inlets •inserts F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N f •Energydissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering /vl • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: a,_1bc_aAt5 Permit No.-""Y-011-7Inspectorie kDate /av Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YEI 1F YES, list the action items to be completed on the following table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 7. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: �� clv��y <C_�� ,^i/�GG��-• Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. /1.1�2 A.scc,u�c Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES If ves, record results below: ti Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site Into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: by: (print+signature)a — Title/Qualification of Inspector: t- ma,& 0 6 )"77 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. WA Project: 1 is ✓ A/ Permit No.X�01'01t 7 Site BMPs Overall Need Condition Repair? 41;7-3 ,(C Date-�--47/J` od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits 11 •Buffer Zones around sensldve areas F P Y (f� • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction AccessfRoads •Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roads/parking area F P Y • G F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale •Dike G G F F P P Y Y N N N/1� •Sediment pond G F P Y N •Sedimenttrap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls • Sediment pondRrap G F P Y N •Slltfence F P Y *Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils Wets and blankets G F P Y RECEIVED •Mulch F P Y �N *Seeding G F P Y N MAR 10 2009 F P Y • G F P Y N DOM SERVICES CTR. Protect Slopes CFTY OF •Terrace G F P Y N •Pipe sl9ppe drains v G F P Y • /%,VJ F P Y • r1o.t}1G F P Y Protect Drain Inlets *Inserts F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets *Conveyance channels G F P Y N tiI,4- •Energydissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N •Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering IAi • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: ermit Will existing BMPs need to IF YES, list the action -6/17 Jc 04kwt modified or removed or additional BMPs instal items to be com leted on the foliowin table: Ill Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 1. 2. 3, 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation.(inches) since last inspection: fi,, y .Q J,.Al ll Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. �✓J vI �s� �. �� J L Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YES. If ves, record results below: :� =� Zia `--CHI-• i!��l_. a meter- laboratory NTU 4" aper pH scale _p kit meter, lab =f f. ?�•h.: _ - L, :ems' J'LS' Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES iiiii If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring site into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and Include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: � ��a9 by: (print+signature) J e Lr- IlSIPRIVS Title/Qualification of Inspector: C I i 6 L 7X6() 27 Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. ®-� I Project: 1II4.,ra AK Permit Site BMPs RECEIVED MAR 3 0 2009 SUILDI -04- 0t1-7 Inspect( Overall Need Condition Repaid r R1-� �-,�/ od F=Fair P=Poor Y=Yes N=No Comments/Observations Clearing Limits •Buffer Zones around sensitive areas F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Construction Access/Roads •Stabilized site entrance F P Y •Stabilized roadsoarking area F P Y F P Y N Control Flow Rates *Swale G F P Y N *Dike G F P Y N •Sedimentpond G F P Y N *Sediment trap G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Install Sediment Controls •Sedimentpond/trap F P Y N *Silt fence F P Y .Straw bale barriers F P Y • G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Preserve Vegetation/Stabilize Soils •Nets and blankets G F P Y N *Mulch F P Y •Se ding F P Y .r ��1K� F P Y • G F P Y N Protect Slopes •Terrace G F P Y N .Pipe slope drains G F P Y N • G F P Y N • G F P Y N Protect Drain Inlets •inserts q F P Y • G F P Y • G F P Y N Stabilize Channels and Outlets •Conveyance channels G F P Y N (4- •Energy dissipators G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control Pollutants *Chemical Storage Area covered G F P Y N f *Concrete handling G F P Y N • G F P Y N Control De -watering �� A- • G F P Y N Cornerstone Geotechnical, Inc. Project: 4-'1NARqPermit No.&),de9 - oR 7 lnspector:�,� Date 7 113 16 9 Will existing BMPs need to modified or removed or additional BMPs installed? YES IF YES, list the action items to be completed on the followina table: Actions to be Completed Date Completed/ Initials 7. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Describe current weather conditions and approximate amount of precipitation (inches) since last inspection: �„ rl-e c( v Sc P Describe discharging stormwater, if present. Note the presence of suspended sediment, "cloudiness", discoloration, or oil sheen. / U 6� • 'rvL- P,-( c. Was water quality monitoring part of this inspection? YESd If esrecord results below: -dram " - , oe rlttti _ nits tube meter, laboratory NTU paper, Idt meter, lab pH scale Are non-compliance incidents evident? YES If yes, indicate tasks necessary to bring —Effie a into compliance on the "Actions to be Completed" table above, and include dates each job WILL BE COMPLETED. If yes, has the non-compliance been reported to Dept. of Ecology? YES NO If yes, should the SWPPP drawings be modified: YES NO Inspection completed on: 3 )13109 by: (print+signature) C r w 4 cV/nv`� Title/Qualification of Inspector: ( FF(LL. -7a-604 i7 FIELD REPORT Cornerstone Project: Lunds Gulch Road File No.: 2212 -y? Geotechnical, Inc. Owner: Ron Hilliard Date: 2009-9-10 17625130th Avenue NE C102 Location: Edmonds Report No: 35 Woodinville, WA 98072 Weather: Sunny Page: 1 of 1 Purpose of Final Erosion Control Phone:425-844-1977 Visit: Fax: 425-844-1987 By: JRW We were onsite on behalf of our client for the purposes of evaluating final erosion control measures implemented. We observed that the site had been landscaped and construction was completed. Landscaping mulch had been placed along the frontage of the site and along the south side of the structure. Small shrubbery had been planted in these areas as well. Sod had been installed in the southeast and northern regions of the site and gravel had been placed in the east of the structure. It appears that final erosion control measures have been adequately installed and should provide protection from surface soil movement across the site. Attachment: Distribution: Signed: RECEIVED SEP 212009 DEVELOPMENT. SENCES CM OF 60ONDS y°F eDM Inspection Comments ti v p BLD20080117 64 - Single Family Residence New Applied: 02/11/2008 Issued: 07/18/2008 Expires: 07/18/2010 ��c. 1490 Address: 15515 75TH PL W, EDMONDS INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1001 - E-Erosion Control/Mobilization 12/09/2008 Zulauf INC Comment: Correction per Geotech 11/26/07. Not done. 1001 - E-Erosion Control/Mobilization 12/12/2008 Sibrel INC Comment: Regarding Geotech correction notice: Street was swept but is becoming dirty again, reminded contractors to sweep @ endo of day, downstream CB sock has been cleaned in lieu of replacement and is OK to reuse. ADD'L item: Verified construction debris removed from silt fence. 1001 - E-Erosion Control/Mobilization 08/1912009 Zulauf CMP Comment: Gina inspected 8/18/09, fully landscaped. 1013 - E-Storm Tightline 08/19/2009 Sibrel CMP Comment: ok to final 1014 - E-Storm Connect to Stub 10/17/2008 Sibrel CMP Comment: Verified connection from vault to CB. 1015 - E-Storm Detention System 08/19/2009 Sibrel CMP Comment: ok at final 1034 - E-Water Service Line 01/26/2009 MCCONNELL INC Comment: Public Works will be installing water meter near existing fire hydrant and not at the property line. 1034 - E-Water Service Line 04/17/2009 Sibrel INC Comment: Ok to bury 1034 - E-Water Service Line 04/21/2009 lambertj INC Comment: Verified connection at meter and house - NEED to verify grounding at house - Verified grounding at meter. 1034 - E-Water Service Line 08119/2009 Zulauf CMP Comment: Grounded 1077 - E-Engineering Final 08/27/2009 Zulauf CMP Comment: ok to final 1106 - B-Setbacks 08/26/2009 lawler CMP Comment: Special Inspection received. 1108 - B-Footings 08/08/2008 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction, Footing OK for North Side. 1108 - B-Footings 09/08/2008 steinike INC Comment: Wrote correction, per Ann Bullis All Footing and Wall Inspections are going to be special Inspections. 1108 - B-Footings 08/26/2009 lawler CMP Comment: Special Inspection received. 1110 - B-Foundation Wall 08/26/2009 lawler CMP Comment: Special Inspection received. 12/6/2011 10:40:58 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 1 of 3 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1120 - B-Plumb Ground Work 10117/2008 bjorback CMP Comment: Approved. 1126 - B-Plumb Rough In 04/30/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction. 1126 - B-Plumb Rough In 05/05/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1126 - B-Plumb Rough In 05/06/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1126 - B-Plumb Rough In 05/11/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 1128 - B-Gas Test/Pipe 02/03/2009 bjorback CMP Comment: APPROVED 1130 - B-Equipment-Mech 04/30/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction. 1130 - B-Equipment-Mech 05/06/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1130 - B-Equipment-Mech 05/11/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 1132 - B-Exterior Sheathing 12/31/2008 steinike CMP Comment: 1136 - B-Shear Nailing 05/0612009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1136 - B-Shear Nailing 05/11/2009 steinike CMP Comment: With Ok from Structural Engineer. 1140 - B-Height Verification 05/06/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1140 - B-Height Verification O5/15/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 1142 - B-Framing 05/01/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1142 - B-Framing 05106/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction Notice. 1142 - B-Framing 05/15/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 11"-B-Wall Insulation/Caulk 05/15/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 1148 - B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk 05/15/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 12/6/2011 10:40:58 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 2 of 3 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 05/19/2009 steinike CMP Comment: 1158 - B-Building Final 08/12/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote Correction notice, Not ready! 1158 - B-Building Final 08/24/2009 steinike INC Comment: Wrote correction notice. 1158 - B-Building Final 08/26/2009 lawler CMP Comment: Subject to final letter from Geotechnical Engineer of Record 2000 - P-Landscape Inspection 03103/2009 Coccia INC Comment: ALSO, MAKE SURE THEY SUBMIT THE REQUIRED 3 COPIES OF THE LLA MAPS... 2000 - P-Landscape Inspection 08/18/2009 Coccia CMP Comment: OK, 30% native vegetation retained, landscape plan mostly matches up. Planning signs off 8/18/2009. 12/6/2011 10:40:58 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 3 of 3