BLD20090793.pdf111111111
STATUS: ISSUED 5/28/2010
Expiration Date: 11/28/2010
Parcel No: 00434600008301
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - F.DMONDS,WA 98020
PHONE(425) 771-0220 - FAX (425) 771-0221
Proibe
`-1
DJ WILSON
CG ENGINEERING
CHRISTOPHER WHITE INC.
320 DAYTON ST
250 4TH AVE S
7551 31ST AVE NW
EDMONDS, WA 98020-
EDMONDS, WA 98020-
SEATTLE, WA 98117-
(425) 361-21 I8 Ext.
(425) 778-8500 F.xtL
( ) - Ext
VALUATION: $0 CO
PLFT1
PERMIT TYPE: Residential
PERMIT' GROUP. 28 - Fill/Grade/Excavate
GRADING Y CYDS' 860
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION:
RETAINING WALL ROCKERY. N
OCCUPANT GROUP'
OCCUPANT LOAD'.
FENCE N ( 0 X 0 FT )
CODE. 2006
OTHER: N------- OTHER DESC'.
ZONE: RS-12
NUMBER OF STORIES: 0
VEST Ell DATE'.
NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS'. 0
LOT #,
IST FLOOR:0 2ND FLOOR
BASEMENT'. 020
BASEMENT: 0 1ST FLOOR' 0 2ND FLOOR:O
3RD FLOOR: AGE: 0 DECK- 0 OT I IER, 0
GAR
13RD FLOOR'. 0 GARAGE. 0 DECK: 0 OT TIER: O
REQUIRED: PROPOSED' REQUIRED'. PROPOSED. REQUIRED: PROPOSED:
HEIGHT ALLOWED.0 PROPOSED:O REQlJI RED: PROPOSED:
SETBACK NOl' ES.
I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOINGTHE WORK AUTHORIZED
THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGT ON RELATINGTO
WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18.27.
THIS AP.R6+GATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL, SIGNED BY -THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HISMER DEPUTY AND ALL F'EE_9 ARE PIJI),
Signature Pint Name Date MealgedITy Date/
ATTENTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING ORS IRUCIURE UNTIL A I INAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFIGIL OF
OCCUPANCY HAS BEFN GRANTED_ UB009/ 1130 10/ IRCI I0
ONLINE APPLICANT ASSt'NSOR
'W, cil?& (U('�/, o
STATUS: ISSUED BLD20090793
• SPMALINSPECTIONS ARE REQUIRED 17ORTHE FOLIAWINCc
• Fxavation, Grading, and Site Preparation
• Placement of Structural Fill and Compaction
Retaining Wall Construction and Drainage Installation
• CeneralShe Monitoring during wet Weather Construction
• Limit all grading activities to the subject property as identified on the approved grading plan, paying particular attention to the
be of shrubs near the northern property boundary
• Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of
the building or structure. (neck thejob card f'or all required City inspections including final project approval and final
occupancy inspections.
• Any request for alternate design. modification, variance of other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from
adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing
fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable.
Approval ofany plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and fur which a variance has not been
specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision
of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification.
• Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt fromlhe noise limits
off:CCChaptcr5.30only during the hours of7:Wamlo6:00pmunweekdays and 10:Wamand 6:00pmonSaturdays, excluding
Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating fiom construction sites/activities must comply with the
noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to F.CC5,30.120.
• Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its ollicials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
whatever nature, anshng directly or indirectly from the issuance to this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any requirements ofany City ordinance not limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance
provision.
THIS PERMT AUTHOR V.ES ONLY T11E WORK NOTED. THIS PERM I COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROI•L-R1Y ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE
PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS. MAROUEES, ETC.) WILL REOUIRE SEPARAIF PFRMSSION,
PERMT TIME LIMI $FF FCDC 19.00.005(A)(0)
PUBIJC: WORKS 425 771-M I PR&TRFA7MNNT 425 672-5755 1 MN. CLING 425 275-0g01
When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being
recuested. Contact Name and Phone Number. Date Prefereed, and whether You nrefer mornine or afternoon.
I'.Frosion Conlrol/Mobiliratiun
• IA:ooti ng Drain TL Conveyance
• liingineering Final
• IWAuilding Final
20Fd7f9so**oP
CITY OF EDMONDS
SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
FOR SOILS
PERMIT # 3LD -200 0 9 3 DATE:
PROJECT SITE ADDRESS: I g z o S G (),.,,a F t'. I%, .'.'� i7 r: ,, c
PROJECT
SPECIAL INSPECTION AGENCY
*One form must be completed by each Special Inspection Agency or Inspector.
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED: Special inspections are required for this project in accordance
with IBC Chapter 17 or in accordance with IRC R109.2 as applicable. IBC Section 1704.1 requires the
owner or the registered design professional in charge to employ an independent testing/inspection
agency/special inspector to perform required special inspections. The independent agency hired to
perform the duties of special Inspection is required to be a registered agency with WABO under the
Special Inspection Registration Program (SIRP). The special inspector shall be a qualified person with
competence for inspection of the particular type of construction or operation requiring special inspection
(SOQ may be required by the Building Official). The owner, registered professional, contractor and
special inspector/agency shall complete the attached form and submit directly to the Building Division.
WORK REQURING SPECIAI. INSPECTION: Special inspections will be required for the following
categories of work in accordance with II
INFORMATION REGARDING REQUIRED
SPECIAI. INSPECTION ❑ATTACHED
Soils (1704.7)
n Soil Bearing Verification
Structural Fill and Compaction
❑ Foundation and Site Drains
IC Chapter 17 and IRC R109.2: FOR SPECIFIC
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SEE
❑APPROVED PLAN SHEET_
General Site Monitoring during Wet Weather construction
p Temporary Erosion Control
❑ Final Erosion Control
n
❑ Permanent Shoring
❑ Piling, Drilled Piers, and Caissons (1704.8, 1704.9)
❑ Pier Foundations (1707.5)
❑ Site retaining wall/ rockery construction
k Final letter from geotechnical engineer of record
u
a
L:\TF.MP\HUILDING\FGRMS\Inspection\Special Inspection Agreement Soils.docl2/09
THE STATEMENT OF
ACI{NOWLEDGEMENTS
I have rear! and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement.
Owner name -r)a I
(please print or type)
Signature ! - Date l <, Ic I
General Coutracto• Company/Owner name Ct � 5%dJ)h'6) - 44111L " /A/C -
(please print or type)
Signature Ll � Date S f 2"
Special Inspector/Agency name /Y W f% �e fC e' h
(please print or type)
Signature /��YJ � L �.�,:.� Date
Architect/Eugineer of Record name
! (�ilj�se print ortype)
Signature �� .A P�. , „Q.r -- Date
Return the original signed agreement to the Building Division
City of Edmonds Building Division
121 5t6 Avenue North, City Hall Second Floor
Edmonds, WA 98020
ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION:
City Official
L:\TEMP\BUILDING\FORMS\Gisspection\Speciid Inspection Agreement Soils.docl2/09
S'--ee -/
ff 9 I IWAGEOSC::II;NCES ING
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
DJ Wilson
19213 Olympic View Drive
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Subject: Geotechnical Investigation and Recommendations Regarding the Grading Plan
for h;arthwork at 19205 Olympic View Dr, Edmonds, WA
Dear Mr. Wilson,
As requested we have completed a geotechnical investigation in support of the grading work
planned on the above referenced property. This letter presents our findings.
BACKGROUND:
It is our understanding that you eventually plan to regrade the lot and build retaining walls and a
house. The plan is to start with the grading and then construct the house and retaining walls at a
later date. The grading plan was submitted to the City of Edmonds and sent back a request for
more information. Specifically, this area is in a geologic critical area due to the steep slope and
the City would like some discussion about the impact that a house and retaining wall would have
on this and surrounding lots, even though the current scope of work is only Ibr grading. A copy
of their request is attached as Attachment 1.
PURPOSE AND SCOPE:
The purpose of this report is to address the geotechnical issues raised by the City in their request.
It is our understanding that there are no plans for the house and walls with the exception of a
rockery along the north property line. Our field investigation was designed to establish the
geologic conditions at the site such that we can address the issues regarding the impact a house
and retaining walls world have on this and neighboring sites. It was not conducted to make
foundation recommendations for either the house or the walls.
A vicinity map is shown in Figure 1 and a copy of the grading plan is shown in our Figure 2. We
probed tlu•cc lines oriented and made two hand borings. We have prepared this letter based on
the field explorations, information in the literature, surface observations, and our experience in
the area.
CM COPY
RESUB
FEB 112010
BUILDING DEPARCMENT
C7Y OF EDMONDS
r,, x, (,1111 \", ".%\
,LIn, 'uu
I..I I', IlllM,
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No. 2010-003-21 'FI00
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS:
Surface observations:
Two photographs of the site are shown on Figure 3. The eastern portion of the south side of the
lot has been landscaped as part of the yard for the house to the south. That includes plantings,
two retaining walls and a shed. The upper, eastern, portion of the site has been cleared. It
appears the clearing from that area has been piled on the central portion of the site and the
western portion of the site is covered with a thick blackberry cover. The site is relatively level
from north to south. There is a relatively steep bank above Olympic view Drive. The central
portion of the site is nearly level and the eastern portion of the site rises to the property line and
beyond. Based on the topography it appears the upper (eastern end) of the site has been cut, the
center part of the site has been leveled, and the lower (western end) of the site above Olympic
View Dr has been filled, although there is no verification of that.
Geologic Map:
The Geologic "DRAFT Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area" map by Booth, Cox,
Troost and Shimel dated January 4, 2004 is shown in Figure 4. Based on this map the site is well
within the boundaries of Qva or Advance Outwash. This material is generally granular and
glacially overridden hence very dense. On steep slopes it weathers relatively quickly to a
granular soil which typically stands on an angle of about 39 degrees. The formation is generally
permeable and not subject to deep seated landslides.
LIDAR:
A LIDAR image is shown on Figure 5. LIDAR is a technique of taking pictures with a wave
length that sees through coverings on the earth's surface leaving a good 3-D image of the ground
surface. Note that there are no signs of massive sliding in the area of the site.
Probing:
A pointed 3/8 inch diameter, 6 foot long steel rod with a T handle on top was used to probe the
area as shown on Figure 2. No attempt was made to probe in the areas covered with cut brush or
heavy blackberry vines. The depth of practical refusal is shown in red on the drawing. In
general, practical refusal was reached at 1.5 to 6 fleet with an average of about 3 feet.
Borings:
I land borings were advanced at 2 locations as shown on the site and Exploration Plan (Figure 2).
The boring logs are included as Figures 5 and 6. HI I-1 was located near the center of the
property and encountered on the order of 3-1/2 to 4-1/2 feet of fill over weathered Advance
outwash. HH-2 was located near the upper (eastern end) of the lot and encountered '/2 foot of f ill
Final Report 2.9-10 2 11 WA GF.0SC11'.NCl:S IN(
February 9, 2010
I IWA Project No. 2010-003-21 '1100
or topsoil over weathered Advance Outwash. Based on the borings, the depth to refusal of the
probe was not a good indicator of the top of the Advance Outwash.
Subsurface Conditions:
Based on the above field observations and exploration it appears the upper part of the site has
been cut at some point in the past and the central and lower portions ofthe site have been filled.
Fill was probably uncontrolled and is a few feet thick. The parent material is Advance Outwash
which is weathered in the upper few feet. 'There were no indications of surface sloughing or
deep seated failures.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Slooe stability:
No indication of slope sloughing or deep seated slope instability was observed. We believe the
parent materials encountered were Advance Outwash which is consistent with the geologic map.
Deep seated failures in Advance Outwash would not be expected unless it is located on weaker
soils and the go fix the ride on a very large slide. We do not see any indication of that scenario
at this site. We do not foresee any negative impacts on this site or on any neighboring properties
from a geologic perspective. Drainage and erosion must be controlled.
Grading:
The steepest grading slopes appear to be 21-1:1 V (2 horizontal to I Vertical). All materials
encountered at the site, and we believe all materials on the site that are not highly organic, could
be cut or filled to this angle and remain stable. As long as surface water and erosion are
controlled, we do not foresee any negative impacts on this lot or neighboring properties from this
grading from a geologic perspective.
House:
A house foundation would be constructed in the weathered Advance Outwash soil and not in the
fill. The depth into the Advance Outwash soils was not determined but it is probably a few feet.
We do not foresee any reason a house could not be built on this site and we do not foresee the
house having any geologically unfavorable impacts on this lot or neighboring properties. Design
of the house foundations will require location specific foundation explorations and design
recommendations.
Retaining walls:
In our opinion, properly designed and constructed retaining walls could be constructed anywhere
on the lot without causing instability of adjacent properties. These walls will require location
Final Repin2-9-10 3 1IWA GFOSCIYNCES INC.
February 9, 2010
HWA Project No.2010-003-21 TWO
specific foundation explorations and recommendations. The type of wall which is most
applicable will depend on location, height and the foundation conditions at the location.
Wet weather construction:
The soils at this site may be relatively highly erodible depending upon what is encountered in the
cuts and what is used for fill. During the normal construction window, normal BMP's (covering
bare ground during wet weather, vegetating bare ground, etc.) should be used and should control
erosion.
CON Drr1ONS AND LIMITATIONS
We have prepared this report for TJ Wilson and his design team for use in obtaining the permit
for the grading plan shown herein and addressing the issues brought up by the City of Edmonds
in the Attachment I. Although walls and a house are discussed no explorations were done to
support those activities and no foundation design recommendations are presented herein.
This report should be provided in its entirety to prospective contractors; however, the
conclusions and interpretations presented herein should not be construed as a warranty ofthe
subsurface conditions. Experience shows that soil and ground water conditions can vary
significantly over small distances. Inconsistent conditions may occur between explorations that
may not be detected by a geotechnical study. If, during future site operations, subsurface
conditions are encountered which vary appreciably from those described herein, HWA should be
notified to review the recommendations made in this report, and revise, if necessary. If there is a
substantial lapse of time between submission of this report and the start of construction, or if
conditions change due to construction operations, it is recommended that this report be reviewed
to determine the applicability of the conclusions and recommendations considering the changed
conditions and time lapse.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner, or the
owners' representative, to ensure that the information and recommendations are brought to the
attention of the appropriate design team personnel and incorporated into the project plans and
specifications, and the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and subcontractors
carry out such recommendations in the field.
We recommend I IWA GeoSciences Inc. be retained to monitor construction, evaluate soil and
ground water conditions as they are exposed, and verify that subgrade preparation, backfilling,
and compaction are accomplished in accordance with the specifications.
Within the limitations of scope, schedule and budget, I IWA attempted to execute these services
in accordance with generally accepted professional principles and practices in the fields of
geotechnical engineering and engineering geology at the time the report was prepared. No
Penal Repro 2-9J0 4 HWA GBOScwN<'Y.s INC.
February 9, 2010
1IWA Project No. 2010-003-21 T100
warranty, express or implied, is made. The scope of our work did not include environmental
assessments or evaluations regarding the presence or absence of wetlands or hazardous or toxic
substances in the soil, surface water, or ground water at this site.
This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety engineering. We do not direct the
contractor's operations, and cannot be responsible for the safety of personnel other than our own
on the site. As such, the safety of others is the responsibility of the contractor. The contractor
should notify the owner if any of the recommended actions presented herein are considered
unsafe.
Qeae�
We appreciate this opportunity to be of service.
Sincerely,
HWA GEOSCIENCES IN(:.
Tom Kimsey, PhD, PE
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
TK:TT:cf
Teddy Taddese, PhD
lingineering Geologist
Find RcpW 2-9-10 5 HWA GEOSCIENCF.S INC.
,•: t
�uV-. .M •
' yr d� M
1: • T •..w.". .tl... pi•• A � V.• _a_._.0 a
Y -
� L w fi •_
4 M Y• M M _M O w o
M r_..r
...�
.p+i.
t y
+
•
.�
nNG t'r•'•
.r
yy
V•
1 11
i[:V ,,[li.: <a;; •. .. 4{•l .n
1;
_ �
Z.
Ir
• fyO
1 + 1
I "
`
— r
L 'I
t1
I.O.
�• it
"T;�
K0
1 n
. r
r•
,,
116T', HWAGEOSCIENCES INC
February 8, 2010
2,4
an\�
n.m.l1
! �!
Ate`•
C•1'854 SeCt10n
e�
` '
6.0
Depth in feet u'.61#1 <" I ia- rnrohe
�'�+•�
Apprrox. extern or heap or cut
+
h�whcxn ilh'hnuaehuld wade
'•
tense lrlaclarcrry buN1u•s
0
Hand boring dcsignal ion &
npprowuote location
SITE AND EXPLORATION PLAN rIGURF No
DJ WILSON PROPERTY PROJECT No,
19705 OLYMPIC VIEW DR 2010-003-21
EDMONDS, WA T100
197c7_13i
Composite Geologic Map of the Sno-King Area
Central Puget Lowland, Washington
By Derek B Booth. Brett F. Cox, Kathy G. Troost and Scud A. Shlmel
Seattle -Area GeO"IC MaPPVV PrgeCt (SGMP), Unlvershy Of Washington,
and the United States GeologwA Survey (USGS)
Printed January 5, 2004
Scale 124200
ULT', I HWAGEOSCIENCES INC.
February 8, 2010
GEOLOGIC MAP
WILSON PROPERTY LANDSCAPING
19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR
EDMONDS,WA
FIGURC NO
2010-003-21
T100
DRILLING COMPANY: HWA Geosderoea Inc. SURFACE ELEVATION:
3 feel
DRILLING METHOD:
Hard Auger CASING ELEVATION
} feet
SAMPLING METHOD: Grab
LOCATION: See Figure 2
ac
U
r
S
� m0
=
w
N
F ❑
=
F mO
a s
i
G
w o
Q
O
to
DESCRIPTION
a
coi7
0
•:.
SM
Loose, brawn, silty, Me m medium SAND with scattered fine
W cease growl, moist Rootlets. Plastic noted at about 0.6
feet.
(FILL)
O S-1
ry
SM
Loose to rtladlum derse, Ight brown, sly, Me o coarse
S 2
0
gravely, Me to medium SAND, moist.
__—_--_.. (FILL)J
2.
pSM
Stiff, brown, fine to medium sandy SILT to aly Me to medium
SAND with fine to coarse gravel, moist. Bumt wood noted.
(FILL)
ale
6-
6-
B-
10
SM Looes to Medium demo, atroe brown to yellow brown, silly.
Me gravely iuw to medium SAND, wet. Scottered ocasse
gravel now.
(FILLIWEATHERED ADVANCE OUTWASH)
SM Medium danaa, yepow brown rust ma0laq allghty ally, tine to
medium SAND, moist to wet
(WEATHERED ADVANCE OUTWASH)
Hand boning terminated at a depth of about 6.4 feet below
wisting ground surface.
No ground water seepage was observed while co iducting
hand bodng operations.
O S3
NOTE: This log of subsurface conditions applies only at the specified Wcation and on the data Indicated
and therefore may not necessity be Indicative at other times andlor locations.
DATE STARTED: 2J42010
DATE COMPLETED 2142010
LO(.GED BY: T. Taddeas
a
--------------iI r o
3 l
a
[10
0 20 40 60 80 100
Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit I 0 Liquid I knit
Natural Water Content
HAND HOLE:
DJ Wilson Residence HH-1
HMIGEOSCIENCES INC Edmonds, Washington PAGE: t at 1
PROJECT NO.: 2010-003 rI R 6
i4wala mloao3.cw 2a10 •
FDRILLING COMPANY: HWAGeostlancea Inc. SURFACE El OVATION:
DRILLING METHOD: Hand Auger CASING ELEVATION
SAMPLING METHOD: Grab
LOCATION: See Figure 2
3feet
!feet
DATE STARTED: 2/42p10
DATE COMPLETED: 2A2D10
LOGGED BY: T. Taddew
N
U
al
M
rZ
F
�9T(
TS
1
INS
g$
@?
V J
ep1
w W
Q. a
W
-
ID
ti
I
h DESCRIPTION
a
O
O
0 •' MILLaw
.. Lo, brown to dark brown, silty fine SAND to sandy SILT
0
SM wtth or9WXs. Roots and =#dbf v ma noted.
,
_ (FILLrrgPSDIL)
Laws to medium dmue, yellow mown, slightly silty. fine Io
t medium SAND, moist. Scattered fore to coarse gravel. Roots
t
and rootlets noted.
(WEATHERED ADVANCE OUTWASH)
2
/\ S-1
I
U
2
Medium dense, ague brown, Nightly wly, floe to medium
��
SAND. Scattered fine to ronree graven. mold.
0 (ADVANCE OUTWASH)
_.
3
Hand bowing terminated at a depth of about 3.0 feet below
ezlsbq ground surface.
4 Noground watarseepegewaa obawwd while conducting 4
hand boft opereaons.
10-
NOTE: This log of subIn rfaca conditions applies only at the specified location and on the data indicated
l and theMore may not necessarily be indicagw of other tines and/or locations.
10
0 20 40 60 so 100
Water Content (%)
Plastic Limit [- O—i Liquid Limit
Natural Water Content
HAND HOLE:
DJ Wilson Residence HH-2
HMIGEOSCMICES INC Edmonds, Washington PAGE:1 of t
PROJECT NO.: 2010-003 FIGURE' 7
HANONOL 2010-0 .GPJ Mid
Attachment 1
Letter from City of Edmonds to Greg Guillen and Jared Underbrink dated
December 2, 2009
Inspection Comments
P1 I+1,11'1 BLD20090793 28 - Fill/Grade/Excavate
Applied: 11/16/2009 Issued: 05/28/2010 Expires: 11/28/2010
Address: 19205 OLYMPIC VIEW DR, EDMONDS
INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION
1158 - B-Building Final 11/17/2010 LAWLER CMP
Comment: Letter with revised scope of work submitted on 11/16/2010
1158 - B-Building Final 11/12/2010 BJORBACK COM
Comment: Spoke with DJ who will provide letter to our office next week.
1001 - E-Erosion Control/Mobilization 1111012010 ZULAUF CMP
Comment: ok at final
1077 - E-Engineering Final 11/10/2010 ZULAUF CMP
Comment: ok to final
1158 - B-Building Final 10/15/2010 LAWLER COM
Comment: met Chris White on site to see revised scope of work. Notified by phone message that a letter
describinq the changes would be adequate for a final.
1158 - B-Building Final
Comment: Need final gootech letter
10/0612010 LAWLER INC
1001 - E-Erosion Control/Mobilization 08/11/2010 MCCONNELL COM
Comment: Met with contractor on site. Scope of project has changed some. TESC to be installed as appropriate
for work proposed. Haul route out to 9th. Trucks not to travel OVD or Puget. Solo trucks only.
11/19/2010 10:33:42 AM Page 1 of 1