bld20100013-Holy Rosary-E2.pdf
DATE: May 26, 2010
TO: Norman Sandler, Sandler Architects, LLC
norm@sandler-architects.com
FROM: Jeanie McConnell, Engineering Program Manager
RE: Application #: bld20100013
Project: Holy Rosary New Parish Hall
Project Address: 760 Aloha Street
During review of the above noted application, it was found that the following information,
corrections, or clarifications are needed. Please redline plans or submit three (3) sets of revised
plans/documents with a written response to each of the items below to Marie Harrison.
City of Edmonds handouts, standard details and development code can be referenced on the City
website.
Review 1 February 24, 2010
Review 2 May 26, 2010
GENERAL
5/26/10 Thank you for revising the cost estimate. The bond amount required for the
1.
right-of-way improvements is $35,730. A performance bond for this amount shall be
obtained and required documentation submitted to the City prior to permit issuance.
2/24/10 comment - Please revise the off-site cost estimate to include the following:
a.Additional asphalt pavement sawcut ton include lineal footage for 2 patch adjacent to
new curb/gutter sections.
b.1 6 RSGV for fire hydrant
c.Painting of road centerline and crosswalk.
A bond is required to be placed for all right-of-way improvements. The amount of the bond
o
will be based on 120% of the City approved estimate for all right-of-way improvements.
The City will inform you of the appropriate bond amount after final review of the cost
Bond forms can be obtained from Theresa Umbaugh, Permit Coordinator
estimate.
425-771-0220 or umbaugh@ci.edmonds.wa.us
5/26/10 Please confirm that the unit pricing provided for 72-inch CMP is similar in
2.
pricing to that of aluminized steel. Please include pricing for Lock Block retaining wall
2/24/10 comment - Please provide a cost estimate for all civil on-site improvements.
bld20100013-Holy Rosary-2 Page 1 of 5
a.Inspection fees for this project will be calculated at 2.2% of the 120% City approved
estimate for all improvements (on-site and off-site).
5/26/10 Response letter states contractor to provide haul route plan. Please note, the
3.
haul route plan will need to be approved by the City prior to building permit issuance.
2/24/10 comment - Please provide a haul route plan. Trucks should be directed to SR-104 in
th
the most feasible and direct route. Travel on 196/Puget Drive and Olympic View Drive is
prohibited.
ok
4.
ok
5.
5/26/10 Notes 2, 4, 5, 8 & 9 from the attached should be included in the general notes
6.
section.
2/24/10 comment - Please revise the General Construction Notes to include any additional
pertinent notes provided in the attached.
ok
7.
ok
8.
5/26/10 Most of the items in the checklist were addressed. A few corrections have been
9.
noted below under Sheet C4.2.
2/24/10 - comment - Please refer to the attached Storm Water Management Review
Checklist provided by Jerry Shuster in review of the civil construction drawings.
Storm Drainage Report, Pace Engineers Inc., May 29, 2009
5/26/10 The following comments from Jerry Shuster were provided via e-mail on May 18,
2010:
Section 1.1 - This section should include a history of when the site was developed.
Snohomish Co. records indicate the site was developed between 1948 and 1964. This
helps in deciding what is "new impervious surface" for the project. Include the part in
Section 3.1 on the church being built in 1979 with a detention system. (keep it in 3.1 as
well)
Section 3.3, Second paragraph - ECDC 18.30.060.A.1 stated that for sites less than 1
acre, the pre developed runoff is limited to the 2 year ... not 1/2 the 2 yr.
Section 3.4 - The time of concentration used for the predevelopment condition (5 min)
is not appropriate. The predevelopment condition is assumed to be secondary growth
forest with a flow path of approximately 300 feet or so. This must be properly
calculated using the SBUH methodology for the given slope. Calculate the appropriate
Time of Concentration and modify the design accordingly.
2/24/10 comments The following comments are provided by Jerry Shuster in review of the
above noted storm drainage report. Please contact Jerry directly at 425.771.0220 or by e-mail at
shuster@ci.edmonds.wa.us with any questions you may have regarding these comments.
Page 3, Section 2.1: The City currently uses the 1992 Ecology Stormwater Manual, not
·
the 2005 one.
bld20100013-Holy Rosary-2 Page 2 of 5
The description under Task 4 should differentiate between the existing detention system
·
(if any) and the proposed one.
a.Page 16, Section 3.3: Per ECDC Chapter 18.30.060.B.1, runoff treatment is only
required in developments that create or add 5,000 square feet of new impervious
surface. Recheck the amount of "new impervious" that is pollution generating per
the comment in the attachment. If it is less than 5,000, no water quality treatment is
required. If water quality treatment is not required then you can also disregard the
comments in the attachment regarding the dead storage (it is not necessary). At a
minimum, regardless of how much PGIS, please outfit all catch basins in the parking
area with down turned 90 degree elbows on the outlet pipe, in order to provide some
oil control (including regular cleaning).
Sheet L2.1 Landscape Plan
ok
1.
Sheet C1.0 Site Plan
1.2/24/10 comment - Please revise Construction Notes as follows:
ok
All Notes
ok
Note 1 -
5/26/10 Please reference detail 3 on sheet C6.2 instead of sheet C6.1.
Note 5 -
2/24/10 comment - Details on the placement of the concrete curb stop are also
provided in section detail C on sheet C3.1. Please reference under this note.
ok
Note 7 -
ok
Note 10 -
ok
Note 12 -
ok
Note 13 -
ok
2.
ok
3.
5/26/10 End curb note was added on the east side of the drop-off drive, but the comment
4.
below was intended to address the walkway on the west side of the drop-off drive. As the
walkway on the west side of the drop-off drive is not wheel chair accessible, my
assumption is there will be a step down at the north end of the walk, consistent with Sheets
A1.3 and A1.6. However, this plan sheet shows a break in the curb, which seems to imply
the sidewalk ramps to the drive aisle. Please clarify/revise accordingly.
2/24/10 comment - Please indicate whether the north end of the walkway between the drop-
off drive and the parking lot will ramp to the drive aisle or if the curb is to wrap around.
Sheet A1.3 and detail 2 on Sheet A1.6 indicate a curb, while most other plans do not show a
curb at the end of the walkway.
ok
5.
ok
6.
Sheet C2.1 TESC Plan
ok
1.
bld20100013-Holy Rosary-2 Page 3 of 5
Sheet C2.3, C2.4 Traffic Control Plan
ok
1.
ok
2.
ok
3.
ok
4.
ok
5.
ok
6.
5/26/10 Please update plans to include sidewalk closed ahead signage (to be placed at
7.
nearest intersection).
Sheet C3.0 Grading Plan
ok
1.
5/26/10 It doesnt appear as though this comment was addressed.
2.
2/24/10 comment - For the loc-block retaining wall, sheet A1.3 is referenced, but I believe
this should be A1.4.
Sheet C4.0 Storm Drainage Plan
5/26/10 Note was added to existing CB instead of CB-1. Please revise accordingly.
1.
2/24/10 comment - Please note on plans whether CB-1 will be a saddle manhole or if the
existing storm pipe will be cut to allow for installation.
ok
2.
Sheet C4.2 Storm Drainage Details
ok
1.
ok
2.
ok
3.
ok
4.
5/26/10 Details A & B callout detention pipe material as aluminized steel type 2, however
5.
detail C still notes CMP. In addition, 24 CMP reducers are shown at the ends of the
detention pipe in details A & B. Please revise accordingly.
2/24/10 comment provided in storm checklist Uncoated CMP should not be used in this
\[detention\] application. The shallow groundwater in this area (evidenced by the extensive
underdrain system proposed) necessitates the use of aluminized steel type 2, HDPE, or other
material that will last in west environment
5/26/10 Detail A does not callout invert elevation for outfall pipe. Please revise.
6.
2/24/10 comment provided in storm checklist Add invert of outlet pipe from control
manhole.
Sheet C5.0 Utility Plan
ok
1.
ok
2.
ok
3.
bld20100013-Holy Rosary-2 Page 4 of 5
ok
4.
ok
5.
ok
6.
ok
7.
5/26/10 Cross section of sewer and storm provided, but fire line was not included. Please
8.
revise.
2/24/10 comment - Please provide a cross section of the fire line and storm line crossing near the
SW corner of the building.
ok
9.
5/26/10 Thank you for labeling the irrigation vault at the NW corner of the property.
10.
The vault I was referring to in the comment below, however, is located at the NW corner
of the existing Holy Rosary Church building. The vault can fairly easily be seen on sheet
C2.0.
2/24/10 comment - There is an existing irrigation vault shown, but not labeled, at the NW
corner of the Holy Rosary Church building. Please show how this irrigation line is fed . . .
will it create any conflicts for the new utilities to be installed in the area?
ok
11.
ok
12.
Sheet C6.0 Site & Utility Details
ok
1.
ok
2.
Sheet C6.1 Site & Utility Details
ok
1.
Sheet C6.2 Site & Utility Details
ok
1.
Please contact me at 425-771-0220 or by e-mail at mcconnell@ci.edmonds.wa.us if you have
specific questions regarding these plan corrections.
bld20100013-Holy Rosary-2 Page 5 of 5