The URL can be used to link to this page

BLD20100314.pdfC)E "'W" CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 STATUS: ISSUED 4/29/2011 Permit #: BLD20100314 BUILDING ' Expiration Date: 4/29/201,"f ( Project Address: 7510 162ND ST SW, EDMONDS Parcel No: 00513106000100 PROP E. O. r1I1r GOLD(NORTH) REED& ASSOCIATES AMERICAN WEST COAST CONST MIKE & NANCY GOLD ROBERT HUGHES 15322 39TH AVE NE 15225 14TH CT SE 8311 212TH ST SW MARYSVILLE, WA 98270 - MILL CREEK. WA 98012- EDMONDS, WA 98026- (425)337-3784 Ext (360)398-7253 Ext (425)754-1277 Ext LICENSE #. AMERIWC903NS EXP 8/10/2012 /: DESCPJPTION ESLHA, CONSTRUCTION OF A TWO STORY WOOD FRAMED SFR OVER A CRA WLSPACE WITH A (3) CAR ATTACHED GA RA GE. VALUATION: $473,127.20 A115i UTCUI IrLarm- E -u PERMIT TYPE: Residential PERMIT GROUP 64 - Single Family Resi ence ew GRADING N CYDS. 1064 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB RETAINING WALL ROCKERY N OCCUPANT GROUP, R3 OCCUPANT LOAD' FENCE. N ( 0 X 0 FT I CODE 2006 OTHER N ------- OTHER DESC IZONE RS -20 NUMBER OF STORIES 2 1 VEST ED DATE NUMBFR OF DWELLING UNITS I EXISTING AREA ILOT # PRO 1 S ED AREA BASEMEN -1 0 ISE FLOOR 0 2ND FLOOR 0 BASF:MENT 0 1ST FLOOR 2042 2ND FLOOR 2I 13 3RD FLOOR 0 GARAGE 0 DECK 0 OTHER. 0 3RD FLOOR 0 GAR,4GE 1207 DECK. 76 OTHER 0 FRONT , SIDESETBACK PXARSLTBACK REQUIRED 25 PROPOSED 31 IREQUIRED 35/10 PROPOSED 45 lrmrmD 25 PROPOSED: 25 HEIGHT ALLOWED 0 PROPOSED O IREQUIRED 35/10 PROPOSED. 10 SETBACK NOTES Setbacks 162nd, W, S, 75th. 35 ft total/minimum 10 feet I AGREE, TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCT ION AND IN DOINGTHF. WORK AUTHORIZED THF.RLBY. NO PERSON WILL BF EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OFTHE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELA'I'INGTO WORKMEN'SCOMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18 27 THIS,9fPLICAI'ION ISNOT A PERMIT UNTIL. SIGNED BY EHE: BUI .DINGOFFICIAL OR ER DEPUTY AND ALL, FEESE PAI Signature I Print Date ATTENTION ITIS UNLAWFUL TO USE OROCCUPY A BUILDING ORSIRUC-IU RE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRAN"rED. UBC109/ IBCI 10- IRCI 10. ONLINE APPLICANT ASSESSOR OTHER STATUS: ISSUED BLD20100314 CONDITIONS • The Building Official may impose conditions that address site work issues that includes: Limiting all excavation and drainage installation to the drier season (normally between May 1st and the end of September) and, securing City approval before entering a site with excavating, grading or clearing equipment to grade or to clear for any purposes, including the creation of access to the site. • Separate Permit Required For: Fire Sprinkler • 1) All recommendations of the geotechnical reports associated with the project must be followed. • 2) Work cannot begin until December 17, 2010. • Installer shall provide the manufacturer's installation, operating instructions, and a whole house ventilation systemoperation description. A label shall be affixed to the whole.house timer control that reads "Whole House Ventilation" (see operating instructions). • Special inspections have been called for on this project and are noted on the approved construction plans and building permit. It is the owner and/or contractors responsibility to assure that reports are provided to the City on a weekly basis. Be advised— if special inspection reports are not forthcoming, the Building Official may issue a "Stop Work" and no City inspections will be provided until such time as the reporting agency has complied and reports are reviewed and approved by the City. • Hose Bibbs (exterior faucets) are required to have a permanently affixed anti -siphon device installed. • In addition to the required pressure/relief valve, an approved listed expansion tank shall be installed on all hot water tanks. Per UPC 608. • Obtain Electrical Pen -nit from State Department of Labor & Industries. 425-290-1309 • Pursuant to UPC 605.2 a water service shutoffshall be installed on the water line as it enters the building. • Gas pipe test must be observed by City Building Inspector, affidavits shall not be accepted. • City approved plastic piping may be used in water service piping provided that where metal water service piping is used for electrical grounding purposes, replacement piping shall be of like materials (UPC 604.8). A state electrical permit and inspection is required if electrical grounding is altered, removed, improved, or added. Contact State Dept. of Labor & Industries Electrical Division at 425-290-1309. • Submit all special inspection reports to the City Building Inspector on a weekly basis. • As required by Ordinance #3632 the geotechnical engineer of record shall monitor this s ite during construction for compliance with the recommendations in the geotechnical report including: site excavation, shoring, soil support for foundation including piles, soil bearing capacity, subdrainage installation, soil compactions, and other geotechnical aspects of the construction. Specific recommendations contained in the approved geotechnical report must be implemented by the owner. The geotechnical engineer shall make written, dated reports on the progress of the construction and submit the report to the Building Official on a weekly basis until all site grading; drainage, foundation and associated ground work is complete. Omissions or deviations from the approved geotechinical report and/or approved plans or specifications shall be highlighted and irrunediately submitted in a seperate letter to the City for review. The City shall be advised in writing of work stoppages of more than one week. In addition to the geotechnical monitoring, special inspections based on.the provisions of IBC Section 1704 are required when specified on the approved plans. Other special inspections may also be required by the geotechnical engineer, architect, or structural engineer of record (refer to approved plan set). At the completion of final site grading and all permitted structures, a final geotechnical report, prepared by the geotechnical engineer shall be submitted to the Building Official. This report shall contain a statement that, based upon his/her professional opinion, site observations, and testing during the monitoring ofthe construction, the completed development substantially complies with the recommendations in the geotechnical report and with all geotechnical related permit requirements. Any deviations'or omissions in the report, plans, or specifications that occured during construction shall be addressed separately. Occupancy, final approval, or release ofthe bond for the project shall not be granted until the report has been reviewed and accepted by the Building Official. • Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of the building or structure. Check the job card for all required City inspections including final project approval and final occupancy inspections. • Provide combustion air per IMC Chapter 7 for conunercial and multi -family residential installations, and IRC Chapter 17 for one and two-family dwellings. • Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. • Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which'a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. • Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activities must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120., • Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims ford amages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance forth is permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any City ordinance nor limit in anyway the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision. • REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT: • 1) Excavation, grading, & site preparation • 2) Soil bearing verification • 3) Placement of fill & compaction • 4) Footing drain • 5)Temporary Erosion Control • 6) Final Erosion Control • 7) Site retaining wall/ rockery construction. • 8) General site monitoring • 9) Final letter from geotechnical engineer of record • New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed*in a position that is plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters. Numbers shall be legible fromthe public way, at least 4 inches high with a''/2 inch min. stroke width on a contrasting background. • Applicant shall repair/replace all damage to utilities or frontage improvements in City right-of-way per City standards that is caused by or occurs during the penllitted project. • Owner/Contractor to provide Water Service Line asbuilt at final inspection. See City Standards for requirements. INSPECTIONS THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 1 ENGINEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 1 FIRE (425) 775-7720 1 PUBLIC WORKS (425) 771-0235 1 PRE-TREATMENT (425) 672-5755 RECYCLING (425) 2754801 When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being reauested Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon. • E -Erosion Control/Mobilization • E StormTightline • E -Storm Connect to Stub • E -Footing Drain Connection • E -Water Service Line • E Engineering Final B-Preconstruction meeting • &Setbacks B -Footings B -Foundation Wall &Foundation Drainage &First Floor Framing &Plumb Rough In B -Gas Test/Pipe &Mechanical Rough In &Exterior Sheathing &Shear Nailing • B -Height Verification B -Framing B-Wall Insulation/Caulk B-Floor Insulation/Caulk B-Ceiling Insulation/Caulk B-Sheetrock Nail • B-Building Final • P-Planning Final 1 0 s m C m t v 6 ws c .• dz V •� 3 aL d d t N •+ 7 T co `r / t •i � C C l4 Q V O C ca st Z 0 CL T 0 V v CD >O CD O 04- 04 ` CL C. O J m ty R •— V y d C > L T T V C Z N N : v u cC d CL C.� F' atm ,n VLLI CL J UUJ LL in � J o .00 r 0 Fa' O C. z Q .. E O Q 0 w� UJ WN ; r.� .� t0 Z Z ::i L S: d �y LL LiA� .N O ui H - -�• o N V Z ij v N UJ Z U) ++ Ow. N w o d C O Ci m C.i LO Ul ti d � w = ,n tC d d N d�0—,� i/i V O C m w C. m 'C 0 0 Ncn O N ' N C N w O O V d > fA N L O V P N Y d U. C R m C C C. (� d •C 'O C• .O v c d ci O 0 0 O C> N 0 C. C V ++ to L E d C 0 O '�C. C. r0+ d O Q O Z Q 0 F- 0 O. m C m t v 6 f ;E z n fe w w >e n A 30 70 .•: et a1 ]a r. BLOCK 60 ME40OM4LEBEACH (VOL 5, PG. 36) C Snh'U K�.au�M. �y�ixnL Ftumkii )(SWnw Y� R IRGt> Otha>j• Plot Plan D H6112 xtie V . 201� ea ' A e Q c Randall J. Kumon BuaLOiwO DEE�Oru[R e —t. 30 Seutn ninptan (TOO) ]t0—�Slt e F t -- k COVYRIOMNBfI� O oslm roll . misnu:a0t NBOm rt M L �mpgot a uu o n4 APPROVED V ENGINEERING Otto: jOhgh! •l p6Ke nems utatb vow ww�www aw».m+�r i litaewtsvorts . 0 2 ry// �—/ P 0 Z c VED qY pIANNINO - LI o t W I�E Z z W� Y (� C ? U) O S N 0. 0 O Up Y on Q I, J W w z§3m LL T ofn 0 Y = V U MR SITE PLAN, PROJECT DATA, _ INDEX OF DRAWINGS and VICINITY MAP Data: � Miarwt.207 RESUB My COPY A 1 lUL292010 I { J e 1 4 1 e 1 e J T J e 1 e L 10 J 11 1 1: 1 U 1 14 1 le Project Data Vicinty Map OYCSA NAY! MIKE GOLD T a NORM T T ST EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1591 PEE, TO T@ NORM LITE' OF TIE ABODE DESCRIBED LBNTERLIM Alm 'NE TERMINID OF THE IERBN DESLRRED LCNTER_IM. STVATED IN THE GMHTT OF SNO 15K STATE OP• . NASHINETON. LOT 07J9U6,3 LOT AREA A" 5 -ARE RET a S6&S. YJIARE FEET • ` SLOT LbveeAoe AS A PMNLEWA6B OF LOT AREA . N.12Y 1 14Fe AMS LOv2RA6e ReSIDmmE, 6ARA6ee PCRLN SDe9 SQIARB PERT' nNGLU ,OVERHAt" MILKS, DRIVEMAY AND PATIO 1491 SQUARE PPLr n^�` TOTAL E`562 SCDARL Peer I' W . IWOMM5 COVERAOe AS A MAZZINTASE OP LOT AREA • DTD16 !`TJ FLOOR AREAS LMN6 AREA 4195 SOIIARE RET 'I• ^V SARA- 1101 SQIARP E FEET (� PORCH 96 SQIARM ITFEET SLAZINS ATEA &0690 SLIURE FEET 6LAZM6 AS A PeNGENTAbe OF FLOOR ARBA • R;}IA •^AS•wy 2005 NA:H TON STATE EMASY LODE FGNOOYIS 95 V VALte. — NO. 4 '. DOORS 00 V VAL(* lmIIM Sb F11RTL.O2 _ 1 Index of Drawings Height Calculation DESIGNERURAL . POINT • A eTDO• / / Ai SITE:FLAN. GENERAL NOT23,PRp.=T DATA,AW AIDE% OF DRAWINGS POINT - B 45AO' POIM-L 51.10' A -D ermoR ELEVATIONS ALA DETAILS' PO HT - D E M.17 AA —OR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS FLOOR A-4 ' MAIN LEVEL FLIM I TOT/J. 154.TJ / Ai WFER LEVEL FLOOR FLAN . IWM' DMD® BY "4 • 46JDT7 A TFIASE GRADe 46UDT5' • OS' -0' . 911699 YIAIGl4I1 AU.OPIABLL WIOHT ! ! A-0 ROOF PLAN etl ROOF VTSTTIUTION LA II.ATION "4 ' X0.1605' ACTIAL R1DSE!ENATION A-7 BIALOIFN SeLTIOR P64 -A SGt✓mULEA1D OETARS ' -- STRUCTURAL �. 1 . Sa LOP LEVEL FLOOR LAN. • A%/ // / S-1 P0INOAT14N PLAN S! MAN FLOOR FRAMINS FL.K SIEMYIAL. ^1.1E,Dl.IB Nm OeTAIL5 • /� 9-4 -R FLOOR t LOIMR ROOF PRAWNS RAR SIE—ALL SCJIEDILE AND DETAILS / /J 93 LEPER ROOF PRAWNS PLAN. '.A14?ARITML 5,MMLE AND DETAILS CML !J ! U 6RAOIW FLAN, TE50 FLAN. ORIVERAY SLOPE PROFILE 1 42 ROAD. ORAINASE a Te% DETAILS LA LLEARING 1 TREE ROIOVAL PLAN '9 J j Legend 2.6 STAB AT 16' O.L. Oi SD ^sm= DEELTOR (HARD YRRED Pl'BATTOK BALK4 ) aN STIRS AT Ib' O.G. a ObNVST FAN EASTN6 KALI. TO R04AIN COMBINATION PANA.1611T 0 W51Ne. YTALL TO BE RmM - THIONE RBL ACL.! ® BEARIW NALL GAOL T.140K ATEWJA LONNeLTON SHEAR YVLL .uncnaN IJDx ' r -� &HEAD: oR aeAwN6 ruu Aurae Q SELL PST OR LOAD FROM ABOVE ❑ PUSH EUTTON e BEAM OR MAOER ' Qp ELECTRIC DOOR OPOe:R O POST YIIT11 HOL.ODOPN OR SEISMIL STRAP ® FOMR PANEL T09. Top OF SLAB O T165TA1. nqM VBNTLATON CONTROL TOIL TOI Q Y'lAl.l. AT IlIfEWAl19 FaRLED AIR 5YST04 TOG, TOP OF LQMIER aR 91e9.I Ory LAMP HOLRM MTN PLLL "TCN V_ OHAHGe IN LML 14LTIFLe PIOOD1.1611T A55010LY EDINLAND. LINO 11=RE YGT. NMBeRPHeeT ON MICH SELT. 19 54014'I O SIeTFAGE MOUNTED INLAND. YULE YV.01. MALL ELBVJ5MET ON AMEN ELF/. S SImPN ® INDMOIIAL'LOURBSfRNT FI=RE 1 "NOOM N,+BCR - SEE YUNDOM SGIe'mu iu SINGLE-FoLE MALL "TLH d SImYRBI MUD �� 9 - YUY S',TGN {MB IKYlE BIB 4 - HAY •JIYITGII -n - 4• T_ LINE I!S v 5Y'ITGN —FD— 4• PENFORATE, FOINOATION DRAIN VNS YIAT6 FRvcF "'.. —"— FILTER FABRIC PQILE iiNS LpT VOLTAGE —1" ODD DOYRbPOIT 1 SIVTLH AN, DOUBLE RJ•ZEFTACLS. �LB LATH BASIN 10--R RANGE OUTLET C.O. LLGAN OOT •alPmTGJPLKE ReGPP,AC12 MT.ET ___ W__ LOMOIIR • TRIPLEX RECEP,ALLP WILT ___ NON LOHTMR b SINSL! 5,ea'IAL PURPOSE RBL. WTLCT IDD.4S NEM POINT ELEVATION O BOOR SIN6LE Rwvpr CLB OUTLET 0 REVIS ON 77T Plot Plan Q SLALG I' • ZD' -0' IS= 14th CWRT SP. ,DOI3 1 DST lD4 SITE ADDIE7! TSIO 16DM STRLT:r� TAXJI0600000L WAL D F TIONa TING A PORTOIJ OP LOTS I ANDO.BLOC OP OP MAWMDALE BBALN ACCORpN6 TO THE PLAT THEREOF RBLORDED IN VOLUME S OF PLATS, PAGE S&, RECORDS OF ENOIIOMIDN LQ1MY, MA5 ["rOR E CFT THAT PORTION OF LOT I CONVEYED TO 5N0110 w ZMNTT BY WIT CLAM DEED REfg W U VER —TONS PILE NJMSVt "-0. TOGETHER MIM TUT PORTION OF VACATED SEASIDE Ave. AD.YJININ6. SAID PIORE PARTIMLARLT DESLRI@D AS P0.LOAS, A IODJ FOOT EA\50911 FOR _,NASI! HAVN6 !DO PEE, OF •J .— ON UGI SAC OF THE POLL " OBLW BED COJTERLII@, GOM91 '- ATM SOUTHMST CORIIIIt OF TM ABOVE DESCRIBED TRALT OF LAND, T1eNGE SWTI _' 45' WT ALONG THE S -TN LITE THEREOF A DISTANLe OF _T FEET TO ME TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING OF Me HEREIN OGSORISED OQRERL1NFy T a NORM OIOS' 25' FIST, A 0 STANCE OF SIA+ FEBT, T a NORM T T ST EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1591 PEE, TO T@ NORM LITE' OF TIE ABODE DESCRIBED LBNTERLIM Alm 'NE TERMINID OF THE IERBN DESLRRED LCNTER_IM. STVATED IN THE GMHTT OF SNO 15K STATE OP• . NASHINETON. LOT 07J9U6,3 LOT AREA A" 5 -ARE RET a S6&S. YJIARE FEET • ` SLOT LbveeAoe AS A PMNLEWA6B OF LOT AREA . N.12Y 1 14Fe AMS LOv2RA6e ReSIDmmE, 6ARA6ee PCRLN SDe9 SQIARB PERT' nNGLU ,OVERHAt" MILKS, DRIVEMAY AND PATIO 1491 SQUARE PPLr n^�` TOTAL E`562 SCDARL Peer I' W . IWOMM5 COVERAOe AS A MAZZINTASE OP LOT AREA • DTD16 !`TJ FLOOR AREAS LMN6 AREA 4195 SOIIARE RET 'I• ^V SARA- 1101 SQIARP E FEET (� PORCH 96 SQIARM ITFEET SLAZINS ATEA &0690 SLIURE FEET 6LAZM6 AS A PeNGENTAbe OF FLOOR ARBA • R;}IA •^AS•wy 2005 NA:H TON STATE EMASY LODE FGNOOYIS 95 V VALte. — NO. 4 '. DOORS 00 V VAL(* lmIIM Sb F11RTL.O2 _ 1 Index of Drawings Height Calculation DESIGNERURAL . POINT • A eTDO• / / Ai SITE:FLAN. GENERAL NOT23,PRp.=T DATA,AW AIDE% OF DRAWINGS POINT - B 45AO' POIM-L 51.10' A -D ermoR ELEVATIONS ALA DETAILS' PO HT - D E M.17 AA —OR ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS FLOOR A-4 ' MAIN LEVEL FLIM I TOT/J. 154.TJ / Ai WFER LEVEL FLOOR FLAN . IWM' DMD® BY "4 • 46JDT7 A TFIASE GRADe 46UDT5' • OS' -0' . 911699 YIAIGl4I1 AU.OPIABLL WIOHT ! ! A-0 ROOF PLAN etl ROOF VTSTTIUTION LA II.ATION "4 ' X0.1605' ACTIAL R1DSE!ENATION A-7 BIALOIFN SeLTIOR P64 -A SGt✓mULEA1D OETARS ' -- STRUCTURAL �. 1 . Sa LOP LEVEL FLOOR LAN. • A%/ // / S-1 P0INOAT14N PLAN S! MAN FLOOR FRAMINS FL.K SIEMYIAL. ^1.1E,Dl.IB Nm OeTAIL5 • /� 9-4 -R FLOOR t LOIMR ROOF PRAWNS RAR SIE—ALL SCJIEDILE AND DETAILS / /J 93 LEPER ROOF PRAWNS PLAN. '.A14?ARITML 5,MMLE AND DETAILS CML !J ! U 6RAOIW FLAN, TE50 FLAN. ORIVERAY SLOPE PROFILE 1 42 ROAD. ORAINASE a Te% DETAILS LA LLEARING 1 TREE ROIOVAL PLAN '9 J j Legend 2.6 STAB AT 16' O.L. Oi SD ^sm= DEELTOR (HARD YRRED Pl'BATTOK BALK4 ) aN STIRS AT Ib' O.G. a ObNVST FAN EASTN6 KALI. TO R04AIN COMBINATION PANA.1611T 0 W51Ne. YTALL TO BE RmM - THIONE RBL ACL.! ® BEARIW NALL GAOL T.140K ATEWJA LONNeLTON SHEAR YVLL .uncnaN IJDx ' r -� &HEAD: oR aeAwN6 ruu Aurae Q SELL PST OR LOAD FROM ABOVE ❑ PUSH EUTTON e BEAM OR MAOER ' Qp ELECTRIC DOOR OPOe:R O POST YIIT11 HOL.ODOPN OR SEISMIL STRAP ® FOMR PANEL T09. Top OF SLAB O T165TA1. nqM VBNTLATON CONTROL TOIL TOI Q Y'lAl.l. AT IlIfEWAl19 FaRLED AIR 5YST04 TOG, TOP OF LQMIER aR 91e9.I Ory LAMP HOLRM MTN PLLL "TCN V_ OHAHGe IN LML 14LTIFLe PIOOD1.1611T A55010LY EDINLAND. LINO 11=RE YGT. NMBeRPHeeT ON MICH SELT. 19 54014'I O SIeTFAGE MOUNTED INLAND. YULE YV.01. MALL ELBVJ5MET ON AMEN ELF/. S SImPN ® INDMOIIAL'LOURBSfRNT FI=RE 1 "NOOM N,+BCR - SEE YUNDOM SGIe'mu iu SINGLE-FoLE MALL "TLH d SImYRBI MUD �� 9 - YUY S',TGN {MB IKYlE BIB 4 - HAY •JIYITGII -n - 4• T_ LINE I!S v 5Y'ITGN —FD— 4• PENFORATE, FOINOATION DRAIN VNS YIAT6 FRvcF "'.. —"— FILTER FABRIC PQILE iiNS LpT VOLTAGE —1" ODD DOYRbPOIT 1 SIVTLH AN, DOUBLE RJ•ZEFTACLS. �LB LATH BASIN 10--R RANGE OUTLET C.O. LLGAN OOT •alPmTGJPLKE ReGPP,AC12 MT.ET ___ W__ LOMOIIR • TRIPLEX RECEP,ALLP WILT ___ NON LOHTMR b SINSL! 5,ea'IAL PURPOSE RBL. WTLCT IDD.4S NEM POINT ELEVATION O BOOR SIN6LE Rwvpr CLB OUTLET 0 REVIS ON 77T Plot Plan Q SLALG I' • ZD' -0' Bim# �� "`March 28; 2© Me. 'Mike Gold 151`4 :Court 522SE; Mill Creek; WA,98011 RE: Ve_getatio4n;Plan °7510s162nd. � .� �Eilm`onds,lA I' have reviewed the I proposed vegetation would defer to Mr. B trees !n they propose < ;rt RespectfullySubmittE ` �f Habitat Ecology -De: P.N i 7Paul_�. Jaye, -7 , Landscape Architect, paul0habita4d g-1 "Y 1,360.658.9810 '� r' �Ta � 1 r• `r i .at Ecology &� eslgn,alnc. - !"dscape.Arcbitecture and. -Natural Resource Consulting ical Associates and otherydo"cumentatidn regarding the deviation from the large deciduous treesihat were proposed for the slope below the residence. or, as he is more qualified to determin th_e.potential negative effect of these ,-.,,w-1826 4`' Street, #202 - Marysville, WA 98270 `Ph.,360.658.9810 - Fax 360 651.7252. . 2011 `,::' � � Ski{, •;'� � � Bim# �� "`March 28; 2© Me. 'Mike Gold 151`4 :Court 522SE; Mill Creek; WA,98011 RE: Ve_getatio4n;Plan °7510s162nd. � .� �Eilm`onds,lA I' have reviewed the I proposed vegetation would defer to Mr. B trees !n they propose < ;rt RespectfullySubmittE ` �f Habitat Ecology -De: P.N i 7Paul_�. Jaye, -7 , Landscape Architect, paul0habita4d g-1 "Y 1,360.658.9810 '� r' �Ta � 1 r• `r i .at Ecology &� eslgn,alnc. - !"dscape.Arcbitecture and. -Natural Resource Consulting ical Associates and otherydo"cumentatidn regarding the deviation from the large deciduous treesihat were proposed for the slope below the residence. or, as he is more qualified to determin th_e.potential negative effect of these ,-.,,w-1826 4`' Street, #202 - Marysville, WA 98270 `Ph.,360.658.9810 - Fax 360 651.7252. . 2011 Inc. 1890 CITY -OF EDMONDS 121 5th AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT March 14, 2012 Mr. Mike Gold 15225 10' Court SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Mr. Mike Todd — American West Coast Construction 15322 39th Ave. NE Marysville, WA 98270 Subject: BLD2010-0314 - Review of alternate landscaping DAVE EARLING MAYOR As noted in my letter, dated Feb 24th, the occupancy approval of the residence at 7510 162nd St. SW was given pending the peer review of the revised landscaping and subsequent modifications. The landscaping installed on the site is significantly different from the originally approved landscape plan prepared by The Jay Group. Mr. Todd provided as built plans and the summary report by Nelson Geotechnical dated Feb 22nd. These documents were peer reviewed by the City's consultant Landau Associates. A copy of their review is attached. In the conclusion of the Landau review, they recommend that the original landscape design architect review the as built conditions, since the original geotechnical approvals had been based upon that design. I agree with this determination as being consistent with the original permit approval and the Edmonds earth subsidence and landslide hazard provision in ECDC .19.10. In my Feb 24th letter I stated that "If items requiring correction or modification are necessitated by the review these will need to be completed prior to the final certificate of occupancy." At this time I ask that you have the landscape architect provide his review and comments on the changes to his original design. Please provide a copy of the architect's comments and any recommendations. This will assist in determining what level of modifications to the site, if any, are needed prior to release of the final C of O. Sincerely, Leonard Yarberry Building Oficial Incorporated August 11, 1890 Sister City - Hekinan, Japan Inc. 1890 1 CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5th AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 • FAX (425) 771-0221 www.edmondswa.gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT February 24, 2012 Mr. -Mike Gold 15225 14th Court SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Mr. Mike Todd — American West Coast Construction 15322 39th Ave. NE Marysville, WA 98270 Subject: Conditional Occupancy — BLD2010-0314 7510162 n1 St. SW DAVE EARLING MAYOR Hand delivered to Mr. Todd Final inspections have been completed for the construction of the new residence located at 7510 162nd St. SW. As you are aware the site is located within the Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area (ESLHA). Construction in the ESLHA has very specific review and approval criteria including peer review of geotechnical reports, plans and designs. In the course of construction the site landscaping was altered from the reviewed/approved design. The revised plan and support report from Nelson GeoTechnical Assoc. was reviewed by staff. The code does require that the revisions are peer reviewed and the City has forwarded these revisions for peer review. This letter is to serve as a conditional approval for occupancy pending completion of the peer review. If items requiring correction or modification are necessitated by the review these will need to be completed prior to the final certificate of occupancy. An exact timeline will be assessed (if necessary) based'upon the nature of any potential modifications that are required. Sincerely, �V Leonard Yarberr B1A' Off'1 ui ing icia Acknowledged: \�J • Incorporated August 11, 1890 • Sister City - Hekinan, Japan 14LANDAU ASSOCIATES TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM EWIRONMENK GEOTFCWaM TO: Leonard Yarberry, Building Official City of Edmonds Development Services Department, Building Division FROM: Chad T. e ullen, P.E. and Dennis R. Stet er, P.E. DATE: March 12, 2012 RE: GEOTECIiNICAL PEER REVIEW OF FINAL GEOTECHNICAL INSPECTION REPORT GOLD (NORTH) SFR — 7510 162ND STREET SW EDMONDS, WASHINGTON BLD20100314 INTRODUCTION This technical memorandum provides our partial geotechnical peer review of the final geotechnical special inspection summary submitted February 22, 2012 by Nelson Geotechnical Associates (NGA) for SFR permit no. BLD20100314. This residence is located at 7510 - 162nd Street West in Edmonds. In the NGA final geotechnical inspection summary letter, NGA acknowledges differences in the as -built landscaping plan from the original landscaping plan included in the approved building permit submittals. Our review and comments are primarily concerned with this deviation from the landscaping plan and its potential impact to slope stability of the project site and surrounding properties. This geotechnical peer review was accomplished in accordance with Task Order No. 12-01 of Landau Associates' On -Call Geotechnical Engineering Services Agreement with the City of Edmonds (City). Documents we reviewed in preparation of this technical memorandum include the NGA summary letter, a brief letter of explanation on landscape changes (untitled, presumably provided by the owner), revegetation plans by The Jay Group (included in the July 29, 2010 permit re -submittal), and a landscape as -built survey of the project site (source unknown). These documents were provided to us by the City. We also reviewed previous documents in our files for this project site and conducted a brief visit to view site conditions from the City ROWs along 162nd Street and 75h Place West. Comments on NGA Special Inspection Summary Letter On page 3 of the NGA Special Inspections Summary Letter, the following statement is made: Permanent erosion control measures were observed on February 16, 2012 at the site and generally included mulch, grass, bark, and low vegetation. We did not observe any exposed areas or areas that we would consider at risk of significant soil erosion. We understand that the implemented vegetation plan varied somewhat from the proposed vegetation plan. 77te original 130 2nd Avenue South 9. Edmonds, WA 98020 • (425) 778-0907 • fax (425) 778-6409 0 www.landauine.com plan called for large deciduous trees to be planted on the slope below the residence, while the current plan utilized mostly low-lying, deep-rooted vegetation. It is our opinion that the long- term erosion control measures that have been implemented and the vegetation planted at the site are adequate. The large trees that were called for in the original revegetation plan could pose a risk to the slope and the residence as they mature. The current plan is more appropriate to the site conditions than the previous plans. We recommend that the sloping areas within the site that have received vegetation be monitored throughout the wet season and repairs be implemented immediately should any signs of erosion or plant die -off be observed. During our brief visit to the project site on February 27, 2012, we observed similar conditions as those reported by NGA and as shown on the landscape as -built survey. We concur that short-term erosion control is provided by the landscaping as implemented. However, we find that the as -built condition constitutes a significant deviation from the approved landscape plan included in the permit submittal documents. Furthermore, it is not apparent that the landscape architect has been made aware of the modifications executed during construction. Based upon the approved landscape plan, nine significant trees were to be removed during construction and replaced by 27 deciduous, 3 -inch diameter saplings following construction, plus groundcover consisting of kinnikinnick and other low vegetation and bushes. Based upon a calculation methodology presented on Sheet L-2 of the original revegetation plan, the landscape architect specifies that trees should be replaced at a rate of three replacements per one removed significant tree. For the seven significant trees that were actually removed during construction, this methodology would require 21 replacement trees. The as -built condition retains two significant trees and provides two replacement trees, but otherwise substitutes all other replacement trees with additional kinnikinnick, bushes and shrubs. The actual grading accomplished on the site (and documented in the as -built drawing) is slightly different than that shown on the approved plans, with some small retaining walls having been eliminated or relocated. These modifications appear to be minor and in a general configuration consistent with the approved permit submittals; however, these changes are not acknowledged or evaluated in the NGA letter. Applicable Codes Several Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) provisions potentially pertain to the tree removal and replacement issues. ECDC 18.45 — Land Clearing and Tree Cutting Code calls of preservation of trees wherever possible, particularly within designated environmentally sensitive areas and sloping sites. The property is located within the designated North Edmonds Earth Subsidence and Landslide Hazard Area and is considered to be both an environmentally sensitive area and to satisfy the 3/12/2012 P:\074\164\FiteRoom\R\Lan&capeModificaaon&P=RwimTM.doe 2 Landau Associates slope criteria in the code. An application for a permit in accordance with ECDC 18.45 was required and the application must address "The manner in which the cleared areas on the property will be reclaimed with vegetation and the timetable for replanting" (ECDC 18.45.045.A.8). The landscape plan prepared by the landscape architect for the project (and approved as a part of the City permit process) addresses the replacement of removed trees. We are not aware of the source of the 3:1 replacement ratio called for by'the landscape architect, although a ratio of 2:1 is mentioned as a rate of replacement for hazard trees in Environmentally Critical Areas (Edmonds City Code, Chapter 23.40.220.7b.iv). A ratio of 3:1 is specified for unlawful clearing in Chapter 18.45.075.A. Neither of these chapters appear to be directly applicable—the clearing activity was lawful and part of an approved permit, and a "hazard tree" condition was not present. However, Chapter 18.45.045.D does provide that "Approved plans shall not be amended without written authorization from the city. The permit may be revoked or suspended by the city upon discovery that incorrect information was supplied violation of the provisions of this chapter." One goal of revegetation planting is typically to reduce the potential for erosion and shallow sliding of the site soils. Numerous Puget Sound -area slope bluff management publications and a majority of geotechnical engineers and engineering geologists acknowledge the role that well-managed trees play in providing erosion prevention/control and shallow stabilization of soils at sloped sites, especially as part of a multilayered vegetation structure also including lower -growing shrubs and groundcover. These functions are provided through several mechanisms, including reductions in soil moisture from deep root uptake and tree respiration, reduction of raindrop impact. from the canopy and from leaf litter, and the mechanical binding of soil within the tree's root zone. Tree roots typically extend much deeper and provide greater slope reinforcement than other vegetation. Deep root uptake and.tree respiration stopped after trees were cut at the project site. With time, the mechanical binding provided by the dead roots will degrade as they rot. This may take several years to more than a decade to occur; in the meantime, new trees planted now would grow to the extent that they would provide a slope stabilization benefit in the future. ECDC 23.80 — Geologically Hazardous Areas addresses development in landslide hazard areas and section 23.80.070.4 states "Unless otherwise provided or as part of an approved alteration, removal of vegetation from an erosion or landslide hazard area or related buffer shall be prohibited, " Section 23.80.070.3 states that "Development within an erosion or landslide hazard area and/or buffer shall be designed to meet the following basic requirements unless it can be demonstrated that an alternative design that deviates from one or more of these standards provides greater long-term slope stability while meeting all other provisions of this title. " 3/122012 P:\074\164\FileRoom\R\LandtcapeModificaaon&Peer RevimTM.doc 3 Landau Associates Since development of the property required removal of a number of trees within or adjacent to the proposed footprint of the residence, an effective means of addressing this issue was to develop a planting plan that included a significant number of replacement trees such that the vegetative function of the trees previously on the property could be restored. This alternate design, when properly implemented, could be argued to provide greater long-term slope stability than conditions prior to construction. In our opinion, the landscaping plan that was submitted as a part of the permit application for development of the property and approved by the City effectively mitigated the removal of trees and other vegetation on the property that occurred during construction. CONCLUSION The actual planting and tree replacement on the property differs substantially from the approved landscape plan. In our opinion, the limited number of replacement trees actually planted does not meet the intent of the approved permit to provide a significant number of replacement trees that would provide greater long-term slope stability benefits as compared to previous conditions and that would effectively mitigate the removal of trees from the designated environmentally sensitive area. We recommend that the landscape architect review the as -built condition to determine appropriate modifications to the current as - built conditions in order to achieve the original design objective and to satisfy the intent of the ECDC and the approved development plans. This technical memorandum has been prepared for use by the City of Edmonds in evaluating the geotechnical special inspection summary letter provided for the Gold (North) single family residence at 7510 162nd Street SW. The focus of this review was specifically to review modifications to the landscape plan during construction. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to the City: Please contact us if you have any questions or if we may be of further service. CTM/DRS/rgm 3112/2012 P:\074\164\PileRoom\R\LandscapeModificanon&PeerRmmTM.doc 4 Landau Associates NELSON GEOTECHNICAL NGAAASSOCIATES9 INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS & GEOLOGISTS Main Office 17311 —135th Avenue NE, A-500 Woodinville, WA 98072 (425) 486-1669 FAX(425)481-2510 (425) 337-1669 Snohomish County February 22, 2012 Mr. Mike Gold 15225 14`h Court SE Mill Creek, Washington 98012 Geotechnical Special Inspection Summary Letter Gold Residence 7510 -162nd Street West Edmonds, Washington NGA File No. 8196B 11 Dear Mr. Gold: Engineering -Geology Branch 437 East Penny Road Wenatchee, WA 98801 (509) 665-7696 FAX (509) 665-7692 FEB 22 2131196 BUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS This letter summarizes our geotechnical consultation and construction monitoring services for the new residence located at 7510 -162nd Street West in Edmonds, Washington. The project generally consisted of constructing a two-story residence. This residence is part of a two -lot short plat and. is considered to be the northern residence of the two lots. We previously issued a geotechnical engineering evaluation for this project dated February 12, 2010. l The City of Edmonds required geotechnical inspections for earthwork construction at this project site as indicated in an undated letter. The geotechnical inspections included soil bearing verification, subsurface drainage installation, site monitoring during wet weather construction, temporary and permanent erosion control inspections, and foundation and site drain installation. We were retained by you to provide geotechnical engineering inspection and consultation services for the project. We monitored geotechnical -related construction activities at the project site on a part-time basis on and off from May 2, 2011 to February 16, 2012. Our observations, opinions, and recommendations regarding earthwork activities for the northern residence at this project site were included in Field Reports 9 through 15, which have been submitted to you. Special Inspections Summary Letter Gold Residence 7510 -162nd Street West Edmonds, Washington February 22, 2012 NGA File No. 8196B 11 Page 2 We evaluated the residence and garage foundation subgrade by observing the material exposed in the excavation and by probing with a '/z -inch diameter probe rod under moderate pressure. The soils exposed at the foundation subgrade consisted of native blue -gray silt with varying amounts of sand that we interpreted as native glacial soils. In general, the footing subgrade probed approximately 6 to '18 inches and was interpreted to be very soft to stiff. The foundation excavations were over -excavated a minimum of two feet below the proposed foundation subgrade and backfilled with 2- to 4 -inch rack spalls. The rock spalls were tamped in place with the trackhoe bucket and a bulldozer. In our opinion, the foundation subgrade was suitably prepared in accordance with the plans and our recommendations and should adequately support the planned loads. We observed the footing drains around the residence consisted of 4 -inch PVC perforated pipes embedded in washed rock and covered in filter fabric, extending around the perimeter of the structure per the project plans. We did not observe the installation of the drains behind the block retaining walls. The contractor informed us that the drains behind the block walls consisted of 6 -inch perforated rigid PVC pipe embedded in washed rock and covered in filter fabric. We observed that there were 4 -inch cleanouts located at the ends of the walls. The contractor informed us that the wall drains were tightlined to the catch basins as shown on the plans. In our opinion, based on our observations and the information that the contractor provided, the footing and wall drains appear to have been installed in accordance with our recommendations and the plans. In Field Report 13, we evaluated the surface of the slope above the northern residence to the east•and south with a V2 -inch diameter steel probe. Probing yielded results of up to three feet indicating very loose conditions. We also observed some tension cracks within the surface of the soils within the slope. We recommended at that time, that all of the loose material be removed from the sloping areas and be replaced with 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. We also recommended that the rock spalls be placed on level benches and tamped in with the excavator bucket. We did.not observe any of these recommended repairs. The contractor informed us that the repairs, as described in our field report, were performed in accordance with our recommendations. We understand that the soft soils on the slope were removed and rock spalls were placed on the slope. Bark -and low-lying vegetation was then placed on the slope. We again probed the surface of the slope with results of 0.5 to 1.5 feet of penetration. It is our opinion that there is still a potential for minor sloughing events to occur on the slope above the residence. Such events could affect NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Special Inspections Summary Letter Gold Residence 7510-162°d Street West Edmonds, Washington February 22, 2012 NGA File No. 8196B 11 Page 3 the short block walls that were placed on the slope. We recommend that this slope be monitored for signs of sloughing through the wet season and repairs be implemented immediately.. Erosion control measures were utilized at the project site. Temporary erosion control measures generally included a silt fence and plastic sheeting over the slopes of the excavation. We did not observe stormwater flowing uncontrolled off site during our visits. Based on our observations while on site, materials were not tracked into public right-of-way or onto neighboring properties during earthwork construction. It is our opinion that temporary erosion control measures both during dry season and the wet season were adequate. Permanent erosion control measures were observed on February 16, 2012 at the site and generally included mulch, grass, bark, and low vegetation. We did not observe any exposed areas or areas that we would consider at risk of significant soil erosion. We understand that the implemented vegetation plan varied somewhat from the proposed vegetation plan. The original plan called for large deciduous trees to be planted on the slope below the residence, while the current plan utilized mostly low-lying, deep-rooted vegetation. It is our opinion that the long-term erosion control measures that have been implemented and the vegetation planted at the site are adequate. The large trees that were called for in the original re - vegetation plan could pose risk to the slope and the residence as they mature. The current plan is more appropriate to the site conditions than the previous plans. We recommend that the sloping areas within the site that have received vegetation be monitored throughout the wet season and repairs be implemented immediately should any signs of erosion or plant die off be observed. We also observed structural fill compaction for a portion of the storm drain located within the roadway, The backfill consisted of recycled asphalt compacted in thin lifts. We evaluated compaction using a nuclear densometer and a %z -inch diameter steel probe rod. Probing generally yielded penetrations of one to two inches, indicating medium dense to dense conditions which we interpreted as well compacted. In- place density tests results indicated 95 percent relative compaction per ASTM D-1557, modified proctor. In our opinion the storm drain backfill was suitably compacted and should support the planned loads. NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. Special Inspections Summary Letter Gold Residence 7510 -162nd Street West Edmonds, Washington February 22, 2012 NGA File No. 8196B 11 Page 4 Based on our part-time construction monitoring, it is our opinion that the geotechnical special inspection items for this project that we observed were completed in general accordance with the plans and our recommendations. ••• NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC, Special Inspections Summary Letter February 22, 2012 Gold Residence NGA File No. 8196B 11 7510 -162nd Street West Page 5 Edmonds, Washington We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on. this project. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding this letter or require further information. Sincerely, NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. �0� washi\ ed G8o LEES. BELLAH Lee S. Bellah, LG Project Geologist Khaled M. Shawish . Principal Three Copies Submitted LSB:KMS:bd 2 NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. BRIEF LETTER OF EXPLANATION ON LANDSCAPE CHANGES TO GOLD RESIDENCE NORTH PERMIT #BLD20100314 1. IN THE ORGINAL CLEARING PLAN CALLED�FOR REMOVAL OF (2) 36" POPLAR TREES ON THE NORTH WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, THOSE WERE RETAINED. 2.. BECAUSE OF GRADING CHANGES THE ORGINAL RETAINING WALLS WERE RELOCATED AND THE FAR WEST RETAINING WALL WAS ELMINATED. 3. BECAUSE OF DRIVEWAY TURN AROUND BEING ELIMENATED AND THE DEGREE OF SLOPE ON THE EAST SIDE OF DRIVEWAY WE ELIMINATED THE GRASS CALLED FOR ON THE ORGINAL PLAN AND INSTEAD PLANTED GROUND COVER AS IT WAS TOO STEEP FOR GRASS TO MOW. 4. WE ELIMINATED ALL LARGE TREE PLANTINGS ON THE SLOPES AND TOPS OF BANKS AS THE GEO-TECT DID NOT WANT TO HAVE THE ADDED WEIGHT FROM THE LARGE TREES CAUSING POSSIBLE SLIDE CONDITIONS 5. WE CHANGED SOME OF THE PLANT CALL OUTS AS THEY WOULD NOT WORK IN FULL SUN. IT WAS OUR INTENT TO HAVE DROUGHT RESISTANT, LOW GROWING, FULL SUN PLANTS THAT DID NOT IMPACT OUR VIEW OR THAT OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES 6. WE INCREASED THE NUMBER OF PLANTS BY 106 ADDITIONAL PLANTS AND REDUCED THE LARGE TREES BY 19 THERE WERE ONLY 2 LARGE TREES REMOVED AT CLEARING. 7. WE FEEL THAT IT IS OUR DESIRE TO CREATE A LOW MAINTANCE, DROUGHT RESISTANT YARD, WITH LOW GROWING PLANTS, SO AS NOT TO IMPACT VIEW CORRIDORS. VI'sla�4 FEB 22 2012 BUILDING DEPARTMEN s CITY OF EDA40NDS CITY OF EDMONDS- ° SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGRW1nrg, V v � 8st. 18g DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR PERMYT # 010/4" 0.7/+ DATE: CITY OF ED'„o1;DS PROJECT SITE ADDRESS: SCP Ana( —5-74 -!;;eA2 PROJECT NAME: �,i7 O SPECIAL INSP)9CTION AGENCY`�- *One form must be completed by each Special Inspection Agency or Inspector. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS REQUIRED: Special inspections are required far this project in accordance with IBC Chapter 17 or in accordance with IRC R109.2 as applicable. IBC Section 1704.1 requires the owner or the registered design professional in charge to employ an independent testiugl inspection agency/special inspector to perfoiin required special inspections. The independent agency hired to perfon n the duties of special inspection is required to be a registered agency with WABO under the Special Inspection Registration Program (SIRP). The special inspector shall be a gnalifled person with competence for inspection of the particular type of construction or Operation requiring special inspection (SOQ may be required by the Building Official). The owner, registered professional, contractor and special inspector/agency shall complete the attached form and submit directly to the Building Division. WORK REQURING SPECIAL INSPECTION: Special inspections will be required for the following categories of work in accordance with IDC Chapter 17 and IRC 8109.2: FOR SPECIFIC INFORMATION REGARDING REQUI.RED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS SEE THE S'IATENIENT OF SPECIAL INSPECTION . DATTACEO D DAPPROVED PLAN SHEET Soils (1704.7) )!i Soil Bearing Verification p Structural Fill and Compaction .Foundation and Site Drains it General .Site Monitoring during Wet Weather construction Temporary Erosion Control o Final Erosion Control o Temporary Shoring ❑ Permanent Shoring a Piling, Drilled Piers, and Caissons (1704.5, 1704.9) o Pier Foundations (1707.5) In Site retaining wall/ rockery construction Final letter from geotecbnical engineer of record l7 .3 i I-.NTEbMBUII..DINGIFORMS\in4=dOnlSpecial mon Agreement Soils.docl2109 i` BEFORE A PERMIT CAN BE ]ISSUED: The owner and contractor and special inspector shall complete this agreement and the attached Special Inspection Information Form, including the required acknowledgements and return to the Budding Division for approval prior to permit issuance. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL INSPECTORS: Each special inspector shag be approved by the Budding ` official prior to performing any duties or inspections. The company performing inspections must be WABO certified as well as the individual completing inspections. When required by the Building Official, each special inspector shall snbmnit Statement of Qualifications to the City for review. Special inspectors shall display identification when performing special inspections on the project site. Special inspection and testing shall meet the minimum requirements of IBC Chapter 17 and the following.- A. ollowing; A. Duties and Responsibilities of the Special inspector 1. OBSERVE 'WORK The special inspector shall observe the site work for conformance with the approved (stamped) plans and specifications and applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC Architect or Engineer reviewed shop drawings may be used only as an aid to inspection. Special inspections are. to be performed on a continuous basis --meaning that the special inspector is on site at all times observing the work requiring special inspection. Periodic inspections are permitted only as specifically noted in the approved project plans in accordance with IBC Chapter 17, and as approved by the Building Official. Continuous Inspection means the same inspector is on site day to day to observe the work requiring special inspection - Periodic Inspection means some inspections may be performed on a periodic basis to satisfy the requirements of continuous inspection, provided these periodic inspections are performed as outlined in the project plans and specifications, and approved by the Building Official. 2. REPORT NONCONF.ORNUNG ITEMS The special inspector shall bring non -conforming items to the iomediate attention of the ` contractor and note all such items in the daily field report Any item not resolved in a timely :r manner shall be immediate cause of the special inspector to notify the Building Official, by lo telephone at (425-771-0220) or in person at City Hall, of the plan deviation, error, change or omission. It shall also be the duty of the special inspector to promptly notify the engineer or architect of record. 3. DAILY REPORTS DEPT ON SITE WITH CONTRACTOR Each special inspector shaft complete and sign a daily report for each day's inspections. The daily reports shall remail at the jobsite with the contractor for review by the City Building Inspector. 4. WEEKLY REPORTS TO QTY The special inspector or inspection agency shall furnish the City with weekly reports of tests and inspections. The project engineer or architect; and others as designated shall also be copied on reports. Weekly reports must include the following. Description and date of daily inspections and tests made with applicable locations • List of all non -conforming items and locations • Report on status of non -conforming items (how each was resolved or unresolved) Field changes authorized by the Architect, Engineer or City Inspector if not included in non-conformance items. L.\,.M�MUMD] NWORM UmpeWon%pecW Inspection Agceemm t Soils.doclTJ09 ' 5. FINAL CONSTRUCTION REPORT The special inspector or inspection agency shall submit a final signed report or Certificate of Compliance to the City stating that all items requiring special Inspection and testing were fulflled and reported. And, to the best of his/her lmowledge the project is in conformance with the approved plans and specifications, approved change orders and the applicable workmanship provisions of the IBC. Items not in conformance, unresolved items or any discrepandes in Inspection coverage CU., missed inspections, periodic inspection when continuous inspections were required, etc.) shall be specifically addressed in this report. B. Contractor Resuousibatees 1. NOTIFY THE SPECIAL INSPECTOR OF ALL REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS It is the duty of the contractor to notify the special inspector when work is ready for special inspection. Note, the items listed on the attached Special Inspection Information Form and as noted on the approved plans and specifications are required to have special Inspections. Adequate notice shall be provided by the contractor so that the special inspector has time to become familiar with the project. All work requiring special inspection must be approved prior to concealing or covering said work. 2. Ip'ROME ACCESS TO APPROVED PLANS The aintractor is responsible for providing the special inspector access to approved plans at the jobsft 3. RETAIN SPECIAL INSPECTION RECORDS. The contractor is responsible to retain at the jobsite all special inspection records submitted by the special inspector. These records are to be provided to the City building inspector upon request ' C. City of Edmonds Building Division ResRousibffldes 1. APPROVE SPECIAL INSPECTION The Building Division shall approve all Special Inspectors and special inspection requirements. 2. MONITOR SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND APPROVE WEEIt;LY REPORTS Work requiring special inspection and the performance of special inspectors shall be monitored by the City Building Inspector. Building Inspector approval most be obtained prior to placement of concrete or other similar activities in addition to that of the special inspector. 3. ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY The Building Oficial may issue a Certificate of Occupancy after . all weekly special Inspection reports including the final report have been submitted and accepted by the City. D. Owner Remonsibilities r 1. The project owner or the engineer or architect of record acting as the owner's agent shall fund special inspection services. E. Engineer or Architect of Record Resaonsibilitiies 1. Prepare Statement of Special inspections in accordance with IBC Section 1705. 2. Review the special Inspection reports and provide corrective action for work that may not conform to the approved plans. L:ITEMPMU DINWORMS tVectionlSpecW Tion Agreement SaHs.docl2tO9 Owner name Signal AcKNowLEDGEMENTS I have read_ and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this, agreement MlUw(U1 (!md - PL print or type) Date i General Contractor Comipan er name 'C b �� H� �l�S W C . (please print or type) Signature Date l - 1 o -1 O Special Inspector/ ency name 06Lp t l R[V ASO- , (please print or type) Sianature Date Vk 6 Architect/Engineer of Record name We,,&Jc Red f r - (p ease print or type) Sigsatare ..tom Date��el Return the original signed agreement to the Building Division City of Edmonds Building Division 121 Sen Avenue North, City Hall Second Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 ACCEPTED BY CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DIVISION: -City Official Signat o I L 1?EMPIBUILDINGTORMSUnspecti mAxS ddImpmfianAgreement Sols.dac12J09 a ae ax as �i A c� i% 1Y 4 a e R, t"I J. Meuneve '� clwc ESIGFER sevul. m levte. veia. (ioe) a.o-sst E Ir r°l92 13e4chmark: / I mr vvwv+r IL•rJle fc>ruf � i ' �__,_ , , j • Euvnrlax . ex.xa (ruo ee) i / / .b• F / / r b, • wxm. I/ IL•YJOe fG1FJ Ir /l. / r r i , r , / .....r- . ___ r _• � - .-Street r--------------------------------------------------- 162n d St e t S.W. t -- /• / MRee»"//eaf R IL.9D. rl /, IL.MN — — / � -- PRO _ /�/ _ cor+wcM}norwE // RE III NC _ I.. �eulr�w�a Fol .; / y.�, 1_.-,..: y „f�T / •l / canRacrw+nor� u M aorx mas o.snox a „• fNCRINS Z L.S 'S. Ile / /' ,/ � j \• l� 1 _ J l� MF.Fe Fe•aa re uvns v. •'I! /re. } A 11F0 \teMeVTi. Af y. r / iL•>Ibc OER`t e ANNINII ,�I/ i uwtalwcra�ce.wl�ue .V\�_.�-�� /••.f" �/l-. / n./ /J Z 0 s / i ;M,' / v W BLOCK 60 Z MEADOWDALEBEACH i �/•� (VOL 5, PG. 36) v) ¢ p T ti iR %' � o Cn.�_g.)'•iJ c".., Fbyr�- /'i. �•r (1 lr 1 Z W.S'i riC.iwls_fi. ^dCILAL / j ' f , • • Z iC `Rz HDF}F r 10-hci•' — ' i/ Ic.n.e> Q W C y Plot Plana i.o�� o Y � 9LALEr I• . 20'O' SITE PLAN, PROJECT DATA, _ INDEX OF DRAWINGS and VICINITY MAP Data: es M.Mh31, 201U yJf� RYIESUB cmcopy x A— JUL 29 2910 + 1 1 e e e / 1 a 1 1 +e 11 +1 1 e U 0 fe +T U +e 19. n ri Project Data Vicinty Map OYf1R NAF! MIKL 60.D = INH CQ T 92. 1 9D012 59l l04 TSIO 162M STR@T 5W 1 00]1910600300 nNe A BLOC OP T Or MUDO SITE ADDRESS 2.6 STUDS AT 16. O.G. TAX ALLOWT 141•eeR SITJATep IN M GOl1JTY OF SIJOIIOMI]IL DTATe M L AL DESCRIPTION PORTION OF LOTS I AND 2. WASNIN6TON WDA! EEACH ALLORD ' TO TM FLAT TMR50F RECORDED IN VOLUIC S m PUPS, PAee 9D, RefgRDJ Or 9N0110MISH COVHIY, WA3MIN6TON • MXCZPT THAT PORTON OF LOT 1 CONVEYED TO SNOHOW5M , 'Lar GO•TWG 9669. ]OUARP-FEET . .I '• BY OUR D® Re(gRDeD UCETt AIDITOR'S Ji•�� Flu PILL II1g5CR 66970. 0. T.. TOIN TOBETE'R WTI THAT PORTION OF VACATED SeA]IDC AVG TOO:. ADJOINING. •'. ]AID G'SEF@M FIORL PARTK,U.ARLY DESGRIE'•FD AS POLLOWS. ,` A 1000 FOOT G9eFt9R POR D ,,,Ase HAVING 500 PRET OF YNLK6, DRIVEWAY AIA PATIO 1491 SCTAARC P=CT "• ]IX:N W DTM ON ULM SIDE OP M FOLLO'/UN6 DE9LR5OD GEN+e IM. �r`' LOlTpILIN6 AT M SOUTHWEST —R -R OF M ABOVE IMPe OU3 GOVM^&I! N A PE-RG[9TTA&E OF LOT ARU . 2TD96 DBSGRIEeD TRACT OF LAND, MNLe 9MN DBS' 4D' CAST PONS M SOUTH LITQ ROOR AM" . LMNe ARU 4193 BLUARe FeeT T9!RLQ A pl]TANLE OP 6762 RCT TO M TRUE POINT Q Be61N4N6 OP M DESCRIBED CBn Q`! OF 81.44 TITLE NORTH 0103' 23' WEST, A DIBTANLG OP DI.94 PEST, ' 25- THENCE NORTH Tt T' 99' WT, A DISTANCE OF ,999 FEET TO M t1aRT1 LII! OF M ABOVE DGSLRIBED LI9lRRLIK AND M TEIAlIW9 OP M +EREIN Oe9LRIB® LnrmRLIm. 2.6 STUDS AT 16. O.G. SITJATep IN M GOl1JTY OF SIJOIIOMI]IL DTATe M . WASNIN6TON "ISTI- WALL TO De RF)+OVED SEARING WALL ' ... LOT COVERAGE LOT AReA M�'IS 5-- PE=T • : 'Lar GO•TWG 9669. ]OUARP-FEET . .I '• BEAM OR HE m Ji•�� .. 'LOT GOVeRNe N A P—EWA6 OF LOT AREA .19.12! T.. TOIN V TOO:. 11� ... •'. IMFFRVIalS O RA•6B RESIDENLE, eARAee a PORCH 9DD, SGIIARL FEET. DNLWDINS OVERHANl91 ,` ." r^O. . YNLK6, DRIVEWAY AIA PATIO 1491 SCTAARC P=CT "• %y ' TOTAL 3562 S ARe FEET �r`' l^I�, atJ IMPe OU3 GOVM^&I! N A PE-RG[9TTA&E OF LOT ARU . 2TD96 S110YQt MEA) ROOR AM" . LMNe ARU 4193 BLUARe FeeT N Q`! GARAGE � 1201 ^X,UME FQT ' PORCH 96 9O6YRE FELT t. " t GLAZING ARG FEET PILT[R FABRIC PAGE Ove —E F PLW eVSIN6 N A PERL�LTA6e OF BOOR I•ItU . 19.4B6 t � - ^�'�+..,_ lTVD YWIIei9TON STATE eM —T LODE YeNpOWS LS U' VALLe. LIPAH OVf OPTION NO. 4 .. DCCRS ]O V VAL EXI9nNe LDNTDUR M_DILM eb PA -142 MEW _WMR 12D.49 Neal POINT ELEVATION Q REVs— Q ROOK SINSLE R l:E ALLe OUR2T Index of Drawings Height Calculation DESIGNERURAL. '" M_ 91tE RAN, GENERAL -TM PRO•PLT DATA AND 11•IOeX Q DRAW NG3 'rr 7 Pomm-A sl a POIM - 9 49.90' POIM - I, 99J0 A-] E%TERIOR ELCVATLSD AND DETAILS' POINT - D EXILWOR SXVATIpL' AND DRAILS A-4 MAN LEVEL BOOR RAN 1 TOTAL 104.73 / I A-3 LPPeit LNEL BOOR RAN . - A-0 ROOF RAN ad BOOP VC30+UTON LM.LI.lAT1ON !' ' 104.7Y DIVIDED BY 4 . -JD'A' AVeLA6e GRADE w.lgev •ALTU . R1 1P62 RNATIM A -T BUILDING 9eGT1011 WNDOW SLHeNLB AIC DBTAIL9 ' L . STRUCTURAL YI LOWSR LJr.72 FLOOR PLAN ;' / / / / • 9-2 FOLMDATIOH }9 MAN FLOOR PRAWNe RAN, SIR!ARYLAIl 9LNeDUIP AND DETAILS is / D-4 UPPER BOOR a LOWR ROOF FRAWNG PUN, 5HEARFV.LI, 5ClCDUI.E Alb DerALe 53 ZIPPER ROOF —W, RAN SMARP,ALL SLHepLLE Alm DeTAL] /, ,/ / 1 // // CML U 6RAD�HS RAR TESL RAN DW VLWAY SLOPE PROPILL 6-2 ROAD. DR/JNAbe L TESL DETAILS L-3 CLLARINe a TRE! Rls—AL Legend O9D 2.6 STUDS AT 16. O.G. 2X4 STA] AT 16' O.L. EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN O ® "ISTI- WALL TO De RF)+OVED SEARING WALL - 5MAR R WALL SHUR aR SEARING WA L ABOVE ® PST OR LOAD FROM ABOVE I OJ BEAM OR HE m O TOS. POST WTI( MOLDDOrM OR SEISWG STRAP --- OP a SLAB T.. TOIN TOF OF WILL TOO:. TOP LP L0.11TEA OR'JBI ® O LNAN6! IN LEVEL - DET. MIF06NJQT Qi WULN OCT. IS SMCWN ®e 4:V Y T. W4BEW911ECT M YMILN ]ECT. IS 911JrM WALL eLNl9Neef ON YMN21 ELEV. B DHDYM 1 WNDOW NMBeIR -Dee WNDOW 9LI®ULE d S110YQt MEA) {NS HO]e DID —TL — 4' — LINE —FD— 4• PERFORATED P—ATIM DRAIN —T — PILT[R FABRIC PAGE Ove pOWJ]pgJT 0LB LATCH BLAIN �L.O, LIPAH OVf `-� EXI9nNe LDNTDUR MEW _WMR 12D.49 Neal POINT ELEVATION Q REVs— O9D ]WORE omaTOR (HARD WR® WBATTeRY BAC—) EWIAJST PAN ® WM (NATION PANILIBHT - TELEPHOI@ RLLePTAr. n ® CAB. T.V. OR ATONIA CONNECTION OJ JINCTION 90X D aaLL �O BELTRIL DOOR OPENER ® O POWER PANEL THERM. (YYTH VEMTLAT, N LONTR0. AT INilbRATm FLRVLCD AIR SYST!!•U 0, LAM HOLO6R WTH PLLL SYUTLM FunPLe Fi.DDDLIeNr A]]e4BLY RECESS® INLAIA. LI6NTIH6 FIXTIR! SLAFAGe FWti® INLAND. WALL WA9LI. I= IU IIAIVIa1AL Ra) ItT rIXNRL ]IN6Le-FOLe WALL ]F9TLH f� 9 - W\Y SWTGH I 4 - WAY 1TtTG1 IDT DIF6ER 9WTLII ' I� WAT=RPROOFSWTLH tII LOM VOLTA6B 9WTGN I� DWTCH AMO DOU9Le RELCPTALIL R RANGE OJM1ET LUApRLRXe ReCCPTAGLE OUTLET I®. TRIPLEX RELEPTAGLE -,uT I -O SINGLE SPECIAL PURFOSB REL, avn-eT Q ROOK SINSLE R l:E ALLe OUR2T LHAINLINC FEW -4 I OH L; BLOC ME4DOWD/ (VOL 5, P (IOP Plot Plan a NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC FIELD REPORT Project: Gold Residences Owner: Mike Gold Location: Edmonds, WA 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Showers, 50's Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 5/2/11 Report No: 1 Page 1 of 1 By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of a. pre - construction meeting at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We also met with the representatives with the City of Edmonds, Donna Breske the civil engineer, Vern with Currie Construction and the owner Mike Gold. During the meeting we discussed the special inspections to be performed.by NGA. We were informed that the silt fence will be installed and ready for approval tomorrow. We will return tomorrow'to observe the silt fence installation. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: RECEIVED-' � 201 FEB 2 DEVELOPMENT SENCES CTR. CITY Of EDMONDS FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B11 GEOTECffivICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 5/3/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 2 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Showers, 50's Page 1 of.2 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that the silt fence had been installed along the western portion. of the site just to the east of the top of slope. The silt fence appeared to be trenched below the surface and backfilled with pea gravel on the upslope side of the silt fence. In our opinion, the silt fence appears to have been installed in accordance with the project plans. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: 1 RIO� FEB 23 2092 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C-1 R.. CITY OF EDMONDS A 2 All lam (,Dist I T - REECMVEZ� rl u FEB " S' 2,012 DEVELOPMENT SFRVICES C -Mr. CITY OF EDMONDS FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B11 GEOTECBNICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 5/11/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 3. 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 50's Page 1 of 2 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that the garage foundation for the southern residence had been excavated down to the proposed footing subgrade. The soil exposed in the subgrade consisted of blue gray silt with clay and fine sand deposits that we interpreted as native landslide grade by probing with a %Z -inch diameter probe rod under moderate deposits. We evaluated the sub pressure. The subgrade was penetrated approximately 6 to 24 inches. We interpreted it to be very soft to stiff. We recommended that they still overexcavate the foundation footing lines by two feet and backfill with 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls according to the approved plans. Mike agreed We also observed that during the excavation of the southern residence, a concrete slab and foundation re encountered near the footingsubgrade elevation along the western footing line. The senior were . engineer will return to observe the concrete and provide recommendations for repair. We also observed tall steep cuts on the order of approximately 4 to 8 feet tall along the southern and eastern sides of the residence excavation. Some sloughing of these slopes were observed while on site. ,. We recommended to Mike that these slopes should be sloped back to safe inclinations and covered with plastic sheeting to provide stable excavation cuts and safe worker access. We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the subgrade, prepared as recommended above, should provide adequate support for the planned foundation loads. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: r. � _ ��yy L}rj�.E WE L Viip �.}�. � �• 1 FEB 41 0 2012 DEVELOFf ENJ' S£f?VICES C-1 R. CITY op Fnunhinc. goo GoIona w fm*L $\°14 bbl ZI2 FEB 2012 OEVELOPMEN SERVICES OTR. GIN OF EDMONDS : PAD ILWISOAge /3f1.•1V I '� r•� � Q C� f �. , � , -, r raµ �'�:cwa.o;.me`ea.4xcxe/ .. ..• _ c ,3 of r J v V J(/ chi !� ' ' �.SB , ��• / r r r ' / N lANL77£!F ' ' / PA710 1 r� Q = 45.0 f HOUSE FF=55.a f BASWIT.= 45 DJW AT CS pe / r r , f !� To BE -ARAC,E FF=54.J15.1 R£IUOVED ) + Whr i M7?j5'43"W `' - - - - --�/. / _ 18)6.29' Ohl LINE 4 h 41A S CES FEB 2 3 ?..012 DEVELOFMrEM' SFRVICES C M. CITY Or EOM�ONDS �IW Y � 7- 471 � .!� �rr � / /� ♦ •�� 1341 h CP lz ,--' r ' Anon ' ' = 4aG rod B- �\ HOUSE�' S£ FF=55.0 t't f ► �f ,r' ;� r / BASEMENT = 45.0 ./ /.------- Ise j (, 20: /• . I — 3 %J IDIP $'ED/Auvr : / '15' r,j ' / ♦t 2 ,lW AT CS f �` `P ' 515 TO r � ' �• ritJ" � . /S � rr ' ` rt`:' 'rI 60 Rf]IIOVID / / GARAGE FF=54 375 . l r � �J'35'431N � - - - - -•�/. / � ._ _ _ _ / ,' / 18.29 • r / . `�—,— •-- f � � 62 WM lig, 111111:1111 66 ` // E OIY LINE / % �� rrr / rr' j r ' r // 43 FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B 11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gbld Date: 5/12/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 4 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 50's Page 1 of 2 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of FEB 2 3 2012 (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: KMS �-'ELOPMi:1V1 SERVICES C CIT( OF EDMONDS We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. f Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that during the excavation of the southern l residence, a concrete slab and foundation were encountered near the footing subgrade elevation along the western footing line. We recommend that this slab and foundation be broken up and removed from the excavation to expose native soils below. We . should be notified upon removal of the concrete to verify native soils below the concrete and all water has been removed from the excavation. After the concrete has been removed and native soils exposed, we recommend that the excavation be backfilled with 4- to 8 -inch rock spalls to the top of the existing concrete and capped with approximately two feet of 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. Mike agreed. We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on apart -time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 5/16/11 Report No: 5 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Showers, 50's Page 1 of 2 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of FFg 2 3 2g12 (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring Y B : LSB �eVEL CITY OETY OF'7 SERVICES CTl EDMONOS . We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. AM Site Visit r Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that they were beginning to install metal sheets along the slopes of the garage excavation. We observed that one sheet was installed on the eastern side of the garage cut within the southeast corner.. A one foot deep by two foot wide trench was excavated along• the toe of the cuts and the sheet was placed within this trench and rested against the slope face. Some sloughing and groundwater seepage was observed along the eastern and -south eastern sides of the cuts. PM Site Visit We observed that they had generally completed the installation of the metal plates along the excavation slopes. We observed that 7 -foot lengths of 2 -in pin piles were driven into the trench along the base of the slopes and along the top of the slopes. Approximately one foot of the pipe was left above the surface to provide support for the sheets. The sheets were placed against the piles and laid back onto the slope covering a majority of the exposed cut face. Chains were attached to the top of the plates and around the piles- located at the top of the slope. The trenches along the base of the plates were then backfilled with 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls were. then piled within the. southeastern corner of the excavation. We recommended that the remaining southern excavation cut for the residence be similarly supported with metal plates. We also recommended that the remaining exposed upper portions of the slope be covered with plastic sheeting. Mike agreed. We were informed that the footing trenches would be excavated tomorrow after installation of the metal plates. We will return to observe the foundation subgrade. We observed that material from the'excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being .trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the temporary shoring measures installed should provide safe worker access if conditions remain unchanged. We recommend that these measures be continually monitored by the onsite contractor. If conditions change, we should be notified immediately to provide additional recommendations. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: 41A Too RECEIVED �'c�'ELOF E slowSE�V ES Cis?.C* S.W—& C!?y OFEC�fCS jr A+ CONCRETE 5LE PATIO' EL = 4a0 i \ ` HWSE fF 5.0 r / B-1 I BASEMEN 45.0 Sir �� • 2 j. q , i ' TO BE RfaIOYID UNE r E FF=54 -M ` 4 1, , r , FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: -Mike Gold Date: 5/17/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 6 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Showers, 50's . Page 1 of 2 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of • (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: JRW We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction .monitoringat the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. We observed that they had completed the footing trenches in the southeastern portion of the site. The trenches had been backfilled with approximately 2 feet of 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. We observed the contractors grading the southern portion of the site. The excavation exposed brown, iron -stained silt with fine sand, underlain by dark gray -blue silt with fine sand, underlain by gray -green silt with fine sand which we interpreted as native landslide deposits. We were informed that metal plates would be installed on the excavation slopes in the southern portion of the site. We were informed that the footing trenches would be excavated tomorrow after installation of the metal plates. We will return to observe the foundation subgrade..- We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No .material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the temporary shoring measures installed should provide safe worker access if conditions remain unchanged. We recommend d by the onsite contractor: If conditions change, we should that these measures be continually monitore be notified immediately to provide additional recommendations. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: RECEIVEK� FEB 2.3 2012 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. C11Y OF EU. -IONOS Signed: BIZ � '�k1#177-Al a {.pYV Ri �^GMS7 FR. yrs � a� CEIV Z)t FEB 2 0 2012 DEVELOPMENT SE?UCES CTR MY OF EMIX-10S !l f l , CONCPM I J ' 1 til PA710 1 .' ` f o / EL = 45.0 lr' HOUSE- FF 5.s:o t B-1 BASSWENT = 450 _ _ � / AT C8 � i % � J•. ! I ' f 70 BE REIT/ O GAR/4GE 54.375 FF= 64 18)6.29' ' E ON UNE % !� ! , r ' _'.._...-.._L..._��_ �.. ..•Gly.,, FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather:. Sunny, 60's Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 5/19/11 Report No: 7 Page 1 of 3 4 - By: LSB FEB 2 3 2012 i-vE! OPMENT SEWCES CTT CITY OF EDMONDS We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. While on site we met with Vern with Currie Construction and Mike Todd. We observed that were overexcavating the lower western portion of the southern residence approximately two feet below the planned foundation subgrade. The excavation exposed blue gray silt with clay and fine sand deposits that we interpreted as native landslide deposits. We evaluated the. subgrade by probing with a %2 -inch diameter probe rod under moderate pressure. The subgrade was penetrated approximately 6 to 18 inches. We interpreted it to be very soft to stiff. The overexcavation was beginning to be backfilled with approximately 2 feet of 2- to 4 -inch rock'spalls. The rock spalls were being tamped in place with a trackhoe bucket and track rolled in.place with.a bulldozer. We observed that the area where the old concrete slab was encountered was backfilled with 2 feet of 4 - to 8 -inch. rock spalls. The contractor informed us that they removed the concrete slab. They also informed. us that the foundation for the new residence is located outside of the encountered concrete foundation. We observed that they had generally completed the installation of the metal plates: along the southwestern excavation slopes. We observed that 7 -foot lengths of 2 -in pin piles were driven into the trench along the base of the slopes and along the top of the slopes. Approximately one foot of the pipe was left above the surface to provide support for the sheets. The sheets were placed against the piles and laid back onto the slope covering a majority of the exposed cut face. Chains were attached to the top of the plates and around the piles located at the top of the slope. The trenches along the base of the plates and behind the plates were then backfilled with 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. The exposed portions of the slopes were covered with plastic sheeting. The excavation slopes appeared to be marginally stable at the time of our visit. However, we did observe a tension crack at the ground surface along the neighboring driveway to the south of the excavation. 'We informed Mike Todd and Vern about the crack and recommended that they closely monitor the stability of the cut slopes and move the pin piles anchoring the metal plates to the driveway area behind the tension crack. We will return tomorrow to observe the cut and tension crack. We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to "the roadway from the site. Attachment: Site Plan Signed: Distribution: We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion. that the subgrade should Provide adequate support for theplanned foundation loads. RECEP FEB 23 2012 DEVECIiY OF PWiEN )MON CTR. a Attachment: Site Plan Signed: Distribution: FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B 11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 5/19/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 7: 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 60's Page 2 of 3 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: LSB We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion. that the subgrade should Provide adequate support for theplanned foundation loads. RECEP FEB 23 2012 DEVECIiY OF PWiEN )MON CTR. a Attachment: Site Plan Signed: Distribution: 1� 41A RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2012 DEVELOPMENTSEOvICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS PAHO ' EZ = 450 •B -1I — — r. 7— I ' / , FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 60's . Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring File No.: 8196B 11 Date:' 5/20/11 Report No: 8 Page 1 of 2 By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. While on site we met with Vern with Currie Construction. and Mike Todd. We observed that were overexcavating the lower northwestern portion of the southern residence approximately two feet below the planned foundation subgrade. The excavation exposed blue gray silt with clay and fine sand deposits that we interpreted as native landslide deposits. We evaluated the subgrade by probing with a %Z -inch diameter probe rod under moderate pressure. The subgrade was penetrated approximately 6 to 18 inches. We interpreted it to be very soft to stiff. The overexcavation was beginning to be backfilled with approximately 2 feet of 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. The rock spalls were being tamped in place with a trackhoe bucket and track rolled in place with a bulldozer. The excavation slopes appeared to be marginally stable, at the time of our visit. However, we did observe a tension crack at the ground surface along the neighboring driveway to the south of the excavation. 'It appears that this tension crack has gotten larger since yesterday. We installed rebar stakes on the north side of the crack to monitor movement within the slope. We informed Mike Todd and Vern about the crack and recommended that they closely monitor the stability of the cut slopes and move the pin piles anchoring the metal plates to the driveway area behind the tension crack. We should be notified if conditions change. We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the subgrade should provide adequate support for the planned foundation loads. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: E C E IIVE ) FEB 2 3 2012. DEVEIOFNEN7 SEMACES UR. CITY OF EDMONIDS �L RECEOVED FEB 2 3 2012 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTTI. CITY OF EON40NDS 0ow (Axe 12.1m 61/fAe)( Ir � f I ,/G HODS£ FF=55.0 BASSWVT 45.0 JBF 5m►MENF ^ l , J ' 1 ` I B -15 fi. A. Ir TO BE D Axe v , I ro i REWOVO / GARACE FF -54.37562 . r r 6,4 f r_ f , FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 6/9/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 9 RECEWED 17311 135"' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 60's Page 1 of 1 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of FEB 2 3 2012 (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: KMSO'ElELOPMEWSERVICES CIR. CIN OF EDMONDS We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes to observe excavation for the northern residence and overall site conditions. We met with Mike at the Gold Residence project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. We observed the contractor was in the process of excavating the building pad for the northern residence. Tall cuts along the southern and eastern sides of the excavation have been created with inclinations of .over 1H:1 V. The cuts were up to 20 feet tall or taller. The material exposed within the lower portion of the cut consisted of gray medium stiff to stiff silt. Above the gray silt, we observed less competent light brown to brown silt with sand and sand lenses. We observed steady seepage at the bottom of the less competent material above the gray silt. We also understand that a portion of this material slid down the previous night, and the sloughed material had been cleaned up by the time we arrived at the site. We recommended to Mike that steel plates or some other type of temporary shoring be implemented along the tall cuts to maintain safe worker access. He indicated to us that he would rather wait until the excavation is complete and he will decide at that time how to approach this issue. We informed him that, in any case, safe worker access must be maintained at all times. He agreed. We also observed the condition along the southern side of the excavation for the southern residence. We observed that the tension cracks we previously noted on the neighboring property to the south have ( widened to several inches in some locations, and that the entire cut bank along that side is slowly drooping and moving towards the recently poured foundation. The metal stakes holding the tops of the plates are within the moving wedge of soil and thus are not providing any support for the plates. We informed Mike that this movement will likely continue, especially. during wet weather and will . eventually lead to a major failure if conditions are not addressed. We also recommended that for the very least more stakes be placed well beyond the failing soil mass and the tops of the plates be chained to the new stakes. We recommended to Mike that the safety of workers operating in that area be his number one priority and that the conditions be corrected as to ensure safe worker access at all times. He agreed. We also observed that sections of the recently poured foundations along ,the southern portion of the south residence has been undermined by on-going sloughing and seepage in that area. We observed a gap several inches in width extending underneath the footing. We recommended to Mike that concrete or grout be pumped underneath the footing to fill all noted gaps. He agreed. Attachment: Signed: Distribution: FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 60's File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 6/8/11 Report No: 10 Page 1 of 2R E CINE '', Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of FEB 2 3 2092 (425),486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: LSB DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 162nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. 'We observed that the garage foundation for the southern residence had been excavated down to the proposed footing subgrade. The soil exposed in the subgrade .consisted of blue gray silt with clay and fine sand deposits that we interpreted as native landslide deposits. We evaluated the subgrade by probing with a Y2-inchdiameter probe rod under moderate pressure. The subgrade was penetrated approximately 6 to 18 inches. We interpreted it to be very soft to stiff. The contractor informed us that these areas were still approximately 2 to 4 ft higher than the proposed bottom of rock spall trenches. He also informed us that they would be continuing to excavate the foundation area down to allow placement of the rock spalls. We also observed tall steep cuts on the order of approximately 15 to 20 feet tall along the southern and eastern sides of the northern residence excavation. These slopes were generally sloped back away from the residence excavation at an approximate gradient of 0.75:Horizontal to 1:Vertical (0.75H:1V). Some sloughing and minor groundwater seepage was observed within the slope cuts during our site visit. We informed Mike Todd that these slopes were very tall and steep and could experience instability if not addressed. We recommended that these cuts be sloped back to a safe inclination or benched to provide ( safe worker access. We also recommended that the slope cuts be covered with plastic. Mike informed us that he would monitor the slope cuts overnight and address stability measures tomorrow if needed. We observed that the southern residence foundation has been poured. We also observed indication of further movement at the ground surface along the top of the slope cut within the neighboring southern property. The senior engineer with NGA will visit .the site tomorrow to provide additional recommendations for this area. We observed that material from the excavation was being stockpiled on site away from the slopes and being trucked off site. No material appeared to be tracked on to the roadway from the site. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the subgrade, prepared as recommended above, should provide adequate support for the planned foundation loads. Attachment: Site Plan Signed: Distribution: SW 1/4 SEC. 05, 600 l r •n I AE-a9.ea (CfR) r LE -u.87 IE - M. SSW_19.87 N. lop•SF� ,/ r Gc��taR) Benchmark: ror uoNwrwr '4Ck,c�7p i % -. �v�rroN - azss (ruo m) uu �'ISNpQF 4 useDWW AgMT mcar g rue >rDURANXT , l/ � • � • � �-naso By a our A ' '• � l Nr J l ,Jsasasr.IS.W. y .. ms`s 40 -Tvi %ils Fr -410 20, i HMX FF -MO alswff. 4-W R� trot. 65f AL QI � y � � wy,�g=s�.m 11 T /,��``, 4'/ e / CK 60 REECIE FEB 2 3 2012 oEvELcITY O 401 os C;;t. We visited the site today at the request. of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of observing the temporary cuts for the northern residence at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that the contractor had sloped back the cut for this residence at an approximate 1 Horizontal to 1 Vertical inclination. The material exposed in the excavation walls consisted mostly of silt in varying degrees of consistency. Mike informed us that he did not wish to use temporary steel plates to support this cut, as he was of the opinion that the cuts were sufficiently stable. We informed Mike that the use of steel plates would add another level of safety and may be a prudent approach. He informed us that he would consider the use of the steel plates if conditions change. RRIO FEB 2 3 2012 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C-1 R. CITY OF EDMONDS Attachment: Signed: ,�� o-'141.0 Distribution: FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B 11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 6/16/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 11 17311 135m Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 60's Page 1 of 1 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: KMS We visited the site today at the request. of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of observing the temporary cuts for the northern residence at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. We observed that the contractor had sloped back the cut for this residence at an approximate 1 Horizontal to 1 Vertical inclination. The material exposed in the excavation walls consisted mostly of silt in varying degrees of consistency. Mike informed us that he did not wish to use temporary steel plates to support this cut, as he was of the opinion that the cuts were sufficiently stable. We informed Mike that the use of steel plates would add another level of safety and may be a prudent approach. He informed us that he would consider the use of the steel plates if conditions change. RRIO FEB 2 3 2012 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES C-1 R. CITY OF EDMONDS Attachment: Signed: ,�� o-'141.0 Distribution: NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC 17311 135TH Ave. NE #A-500 Wpodinville, WA 98072. (425)4. 86-1669 FAX481-2510 FIELD REPORT Project: Gold Residences Owner: Mike Gold Location: Edmonds, WA Weather: Sunny, 60's Purpose of Visit: Construction Monitoring File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 7/1/11 Report.No: 12 Page 1 of 2 We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd. He informed us that they had begun installing the footing drains. - They had already backfilled a portion of the wall to allow for access and covered the drain. The C contractor showed us photos of the installation. We were able to observe.the drain along the western and southwestern footing lines. We observed that the 4 -inch perforated PVC pipe had been placed at the correct orientation and was surrounded by washed rock. The washed rock was then covered with filter fabric. We also observed that water proofing and drainage composite had been placed on the outside of the tall retaining walls. . We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. It is our opinion that the footing drains are being installed in general accordance with our recommendations and should perform adequately. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: B vEa FEB 2 3 2012 DEIELOPMENR SENCES CTR. CITY OFFIDIVIONDS Signed: � � 'noon* RECEIVED FEB 2 3 2912 DEVELOPMENT SE MICES CTR. CM OF EDMONDS as lay 6A Irl is If I'M". n We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of erosion control monitoring at'the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we observed that for the majority of the sloping potions of the site had been covered with plastic sheeting and were anchored down with sand bangs. However, we did observe that some of the plastic sheeting had been blown away likely by the wind which exposed some bare soils within the sloping areas of the site. We recommend that the plastic sheeting in these areas be placed back to cover the exposed portions of the slope and additional sandbags be placed to minimize the potential of the sheeting moving again. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: �<; FIELD REPORT NELSON Project: Gold Residences File No.: 8196B11 GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold Date: 11/22/11 ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA Report No: 14 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Heavy Rain, 40's Page 1 of 1 Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425)486.-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of erosion control monitoring at'the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we observed that for the majority of the sloping potions of the site had been covered with plastic sheeting and were anchored down with sand bangs. However, we did observe that some of the plastic sheeting had been blown away likely by the wind which exposed some bare soils within the sloping areas of the site. We recommend that the plastic sheeting in these areas be placed back to cover the exposed portions of the slope and additional sandbags be placed to minimize the potential of the sheeting moving again. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: �<; i FIELD REPORT NELSON Project:. Gold Residences GEOTECHNICAL Owner: Mike Gold ASSOCIATES, INC Location: Edmonds, WA 17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Sunny, 40's WoodinviUe, WA 98072 Purpose of (425} 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring File No.: 8196E 11 Date: 11/10/11 Report No: 13 Page 1 of 2 By: LSB We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes for the purpose of construction monitoring at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike Todd and Patrick Lawler with the City of Edmonds. We understand that the wet season grading period began October 1" for the City of Edmonds and the City has requested recommendations regarding site erosion control measures. We walked the site and observed that the slopes along the downhill side of the northern and southern residences had bee covered with plastic and a silt fence was also located along the downhill side of the plastic. For the most part the remaining portions of the site remained uncovered and bare soil was exposed. We recommended that all of the sloping portions of the northern and southern lots be covered with either plastic sheeting or erosion control material such as jute netting of a synthetic straw mat. These materials should also be adequately anchored to the surface of the slopes. We were informed by Mike that the eastern and southern slopes around the northern residence will begin to be landscaped tomorrow. He also informed us that he intends to place landscaping plants and bark along the surface of the slope. We evaluated the surface of the slope with a 0.5 -inch diameter steel probe. Some areas of the slope above the residence probed .approximately 4 to 5 -inches indicating suitable conditions. However, some areas probed up to 3 feet indicating very loose conditions. We understand that these areas were likely filled in when the block walls were constructed. We also observed tension cracks within the surface of the slope. We recommend that all of the loose material be removed from the sloping areas and be replaced with 2- to 4 -inch rock spalls. The rock spalls should be placed on level benches and tamped into the slope with an excavator bucket. The surface of the slope around the northern residence should then be covered with erosion control matting and vegetation. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. We recommend that we return to'the site after erosion control measures have been completed and slope repairs begin. Attachment: Site Plan Distribution: Signed: 1 X13 . or Al2, SEC. 05, i ?o LFr3a.ar ". + Benchmark: ,, S£ /R r _ _ _.. • �,c .�rruri �,arYaawr 21 (wn ) Ll � - SyoR Y 4 r artxatxi LE�39.70 IN x ovr A � Q� � � 'm�smw.•r � � / dST.IS.Vt� �� AT tsz m— I rssuv�12as9• 2 �' a 99n9Ncc mtr ro 1 J r 4 a I LE-37.90 (L�-)' / f'• ` .\ R 8AMal of `Lf I 1 % / // / I /�"/ / Q wu 9r=mowFx b.41— MOCK -CLOCK (KEYSTONE) WALL 5 N.rs BLOCK / MEADOWDALE BEACH / i ; % , t Ii°"• �" Message Bjorback, Leif From: Lawler, Patrick Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:49 AM To: Lambert, Jennifer; Zulauf, JoAnne Cc: Bjorback, Leif Subject: FW: Gold Residence Erosion Control Field Reports . Hi Jen and JoAnne, Page 1 of 1 I stopped by the Gold project today and spoke with Mike Tood, contractor. He had the geo send me the attached. I also suggested that he needs to reposition the visqueen on the slope to lap correctly and cover the exposed soils, which he agreed to do. I will stop by during the week and see if he complies. Pat -----Original Message ----- From: Lee Bellah [mailto:leeb@nelsongeotech.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 11:34 AM To: Lawler, Patrick; Bjorback, Leif Cc: toddhms@aol.com Subject: Gold Residence Erosion Control Field Reports Please find the attached field reports for the Gold Residence project as requested. Thanks, Lee Bellah, LG Nelson -Geotechnical 425 486 1669 From: scanner@nelsongeotech.com [mailto:scanner@nelsongeotech.com] Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 10:59 AM To: Lee Bellah Subject: Message from KMBT_361 W 12/27/2011 ^\ NELSON GEOTECM41CAL TES INC ASSOCIATES, FIELD REPORT Project: Owner: Location: 17311-135' Ave. NE #A-500 Weather: Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of (425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Gold Residences Mike Gold Edmonds, WA Sunny, 30's I File No.: 8196B 11 Date: 12/2/11 Report No: 15 Page 1 of 3 Construction Monitoring By: DPN We visited the site today at the request of Mike Todd with Todd Homes to evaluate construction activities at the Gold Residences project located in 7510 -62nd Street SW in Edmonds, WA. Upon arrival, we met with Mike. We observed that the storm drain had been completed along 62"d Street SW and 76d' Ave., as shown on attached site plan. Mike informed us that the trench was approximately 3 feet deep, 3 feet wide and 10 feet long within the roadway. We were informed and observed that the entire trench backfill consisted of recycled asphalt and compacted using a trackhoe with hoepack attachment in 1 -foot lifts. We evaluated compaction using a nuclear densometer and a Y2 -inch diameter steel probe rod. Probing generally yielded penetrations of 1 to 2 inches, indicating medium dense to dense conditions which we :1 interpreted as well compacted. In-place density tests results indicated 95 percent relative compaction per - ASTM D-1557, modified proctor. Test results and locations are provided in the attached pages. We have been providing monitoring services on a part-time basis only. Our findings and conclusions are based on construction activities observed while on site. Based on our part-time observations in the field, communications with the contractor, our understanding of this site and project plans, and provided that the contractor used consistent materials and methods while we were present and not present at the site, it is our opinion that.the backfill is being compacted to a firm condition and should support the planned loads. Attachment: Site Plan, Density Test Sheet Signed: Distribution: r i/� HA W.8 C'.Wv Sa Fo W-ftd R—d aw F.& -k tm W. & bd— pw 910CK_(KE�YSTOIIE�WALL I SLOCK60 MEADOWDALE BEACH wr lw Syr 1/4, SEC- 05, 1 ELEVA7W 62*23 xfFLPca-f-so LE Of a ST S. W, c L "t— std �a H d -- F A x p � A O � U V U o � rn P-4 0-4 a O o 0 .o rn V .- � ,F 0 0 OO d .� .�. vz w � w 00 00 N Q z o az ti r'o '1t z F t-, O v, C-4 C14 1p V F a � w Z W F a N v 0w y�F a m m d F E Q P, A 9 O 0 0 U � H F •o �; F. a A A 0 � cc W in A 0 David West & Co. (Professional Land Surveying 1476 Melissa Way (425) 530-7424 - office Wenatchee, Wa. 98801 June 09, 2011 Mike Gold To: City of Edmonds Re: 16200 75TH PI. W. Edmonds, Wa. To Whom it May Concern I; David G. West Jr., a Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Washington, Reg. No. 30442, Do hereby certify that I staked/verified the foundation for the North House in accordance with the above referenced approved site plan. Since , A Dav . West, Jr., P.L. - 1 David West & Co. (Professional Land Surveying) 1476 Melissa Way (509) 630-0783 (cell) Wenatchee, Wa. (509) 470-6204 Oct. 05, 2011 Mike Gold To: City of Edmonds Re: Height Certification Plan Check #BLDG20100314 7510 -162ND St. S.W. Edmonds Wa. 98020 To Whom It May Concern: I, David G. West Jr., a Professional Land Surveyor in the State of Washington, Reg. No. 30442, do hereby certify that I shot the roof peak of the house situated on above referenced parcel and found it to be elev. 69.73 (Max E1.=71.18) This was based on the monument in case at the intersection of 75th Pl. W. & 162nd St S.W. and having an elevation of 62.23 as shown, on the site plan. Sin erely, David 2G. West, Jr., L.S. RETURN ADDRESS: City of Edmonds, City Clerk" 121 5th Avenue North Edmonds, WA 98020 201011050088 CONFORMED COPY PGS SNOHOMISH000ONTY,� G1ASHINGTON COVENANT OF NOTIFICATION AND INDEMNIFICATION/HOLD HARMLESS Reference #: 61-b Grantor(s): (1)M1kE (1% Gram (2) tJ*WCY N- 6OL-0 Additional on pg. Grantee(s): City of Edmonds Legal Description (abbreviated): Sec 5 TwncQ7 Rng z�� Qtr�o tpqfCPwow EINoti OR Lot Z Block 60 PlatyoL S pq' 38 v Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#(s): (1) O 0 S'1310 G p oo 10 0 (2) Assessor's Tax Parcel.1D# not yet assigned . CITY OF EDMONDS APPROVED FOR RECORDING BY:-��- DATE%DSPAGE 4 OF Jr Under the review procedures established pursuant to the State Building Code, incorporating amendments promulgated by the City of Edmonds, and as a prerequisite to the issuance of a building permit for the construction of a residential structure and attendant facilities, the undersigned OWNERS of property do hereby covenant, stipulate and promise as follows: 1. Description of Subject Property. EAPPR VED FOR RECORD G: BY: DATE:/ PAGE _ OF This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless relates to a tract of land at the street address of u►� 17 S E7- / 6 Z —S T S -W .r--- o n 6 u 0 (insert street address), Edmonds Snohomish County, Washington and legally described as: LOTS J'�Pt 2, OL -00:' GO OF J" PI -Art t�lKN ACCORD WCJ TO THfa PLA -1 TtgeeOF REu0R.0(=-d tN UOW[''lt S C11`. pLA-t9. PAC- 30, RECoftS o—F 5Ng4otts14 Coutit"r, WAst "rAtotil excepT i -o* -r foe'r p nF LOT I coNye-ulo Tb 51,tolLorti Sit (:ov N+Y fiY QU ct.e}t.h nG�n (fit 20 n uum�R /ku�lroR S Fii nlurtifi�t2 66grJ�7o TO I2 vac[ -t14 `r kt 66an0tJ 01= ✓ACAM0 SFAs 10 AVC . A- � acs tra r rd G . stTn.k14M t1-4 1*E cEum-rY- yrr Smol4o"1514, 5EM 0V-WA514ItJ6 f,/. 2. Notification and Covenant of Notification. The above referenced site (hereinafter "subject site") lies within an area which has been identified by the City of Edmonds as having a potential for earth subsidence or landslide hazard. The risks associated with development of the site have been evaluated by technical consultants and engineers engaged by the applicant as a part of the process to obtain a building permit for.the subject site. The results of the consultant's reports and evaluations of the risks associated with development are contained in building permit file number (insert number) on file with the City of Edmonds Building Department. ' Conditions, limitations, or prohibitions on development may have been imposed in accordance with the recommendations of AAPPR VED FOR RECORD G: BY: DATE�b PAG OF the consultants in the course of permit issuance. The conditions, limitations, or prohibitions may require ongoing maintenance on the part of any owner or lessee or may require modifications to the structures and earth stabilization matters in order to address future or anticipated changes in soil or other site conditions. The statements and conditions proposed by the OWNERS' geotechnical engineer, geologist, architect and/or structural engineer are hereby incorporated by reference from the contents of the file as fully as if herein set forth. Any future purchaser, lessee, lender or any other person acquiring or seeking to acquire an interest in. the property is put on notice of the existence of the content of the file and the City urges review of its contents. The file may be reviewed during normal business hours or. copies obtained at the Building Department, City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, Washington 98020. 3. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The . undersigned OWNERS hereby waive any and all liability associated with development, stating that they have fully informed themselves of . all risks associated with development of the property and do therefore waive and relinquish any and all causes of action against the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and employees arising from and out of such development..In addition, the OWNERS on behalf of themselves, their successors in interest, heirs and assignees, do hereby promise to indemnify and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, its officers, agents and 'employees from any loss, claim, liability or damage of any kind or nature to persons or property either on or off the site resulting from or out of earth subsidence or landslide hazard, arising from or out of the issuance of any permit(s) authorizing development of the site, or occurring or APPROVED FOR RECORDING: BY: DATE: / PAGE _ OF . arising out of any false, misleading, or inaccurate information provided by the OWNERS, their employees, or professional consultants in the course of issuance of the building permit. - 4. Insurance Requirement. In addition to any bonding which may be required during the course of development, the Community Services, Director has/has not (strike one) specifically required the maintenance of an insurance policy for public liability coverage in the amount and for the time set forth below in order to provide for the financial responsibilities established through the indemnification and hold harmless agreement above: 5. Covenant to Touch and Concern the Land. This covenant of notification and indemnification/hold harmless touches and concerns the subject tract and shall run with the land; binding, obligating and/or inuring to the benefit of future owners, heirs, successors and interests or any other person: or entity acquiring an interest in property, as their interest may appear. This provision shall not be interpreted to require a mortgagor or lender to indemnify the City except to the extent of their loss nor to obligate such persons to maintain the insurance above required. U DONE this �' day of OWNER(S) By: By:'�- By STATE OF WASHINGTON ) ss: COUNTY OF I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ykiJ IVLc 1 L� g G:,J signed this instrument and acknowledged it to be (his/her) free and voluntary act for the purposes mentioned in this instrument` DATED this `�� Y da of L:\TEMP\BUILD ING\MEADO VACOVENANT NOTAR Y PUBL My commission expires:"polo O AFFORDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL INC. P.O BOX 40 MOUTLAKE TERRACE WA 98043 425-357-9868 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION RECEIVED FEB 2 2 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Asbestos removal services were performed by our firm at the following address: 16100 75'" Place West - Edmonds, WA 98026 Be assured that all activities performed were conducted in accordance with all current and applicable environmental regulations and contract specifications. Any air monitoring required by statutes was performed. Clearance air sampling verified air was clean by current state and national standards. Regulated waste was deposited in accordance with EPA guidelines. An approved landfill facility is required to forward documentation of this within 45 days of disposal. Asbestos liability insurance and a contractor's surety bond was in effect during these operations. NOTE: Affordable Environmental Inc. is on the PSCA fax program, as such we notify them prior to job start. L& I is notified via e-mail. Please feel free to contact our customer service representative at (425) 512-8750 between 7:00 AM and 3:30 PM Monday through Friday if you have any further questions or need additional documentation. Sincerely, ANTHONY M CHA E PRESIDENT AEI. WA StateContractors License #: AFF ORE1942DT WA.State Asbestos Contractor Certification. #: 1427 REED '61 ASSOCIATES, PS Civil & Structural Engineering ®0 8311 212th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 i Office (425) 778-2793 Fax (425) 775-2073 March 31, 2010 Mike & Nancy Gold 15225 14" Court SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Subject: R&A Job # 10-128n SFR to be constructed at 7510 162°d Street SW, Edmonds, WA STRUCTURAL ENGINEER DECLARATION (City Ordinance #2661 and #3632) Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gold, This letter is our confirmation that we have reviewed the geotechnical reports for this project, understand its recommendations, and have explained to you the potential risk of loss to yourself and neighbors due to possible slides on the site. We also affirm that we have incorporated the recommendations of the geotechnical report into the structural design of this project. In addition, we have worked closely with you, the geotechnical engineer, civil engineer, and the architect to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage that might be caused by any earth movement predicted in the report. All people who own or occupy homes in a known earth subsidence and landslide hazard area should know that earth movements are always a possibility. They must assume responsibility for all risks, damage and loss associated with such an area. If any. further clarification is required or you have any questions, please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, Wendell Reed P.E. CBO w . APR 2 6 2010 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS CITY DOPY Donna L. Breske, P.E. 6621 Foster Slough Road, Snohomish, Wa. 98290 ,!' ' Phone: (425) 334-9980, Fax: (425) 334-7380 4, donnabreske@comcast.net April 22, 2010 City of Edmonds 121 5`h Ave. North Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: Civil Engineer's Statement of Risk for Earth Subsidence Landslide Hazard Area Reference: Michael & Nancy Gold -North House, Single Family Home, New Construction 7510.162°d ST. S.W., Edmonds, WA 98020 The plan set prepared by this Civil Engineer and dated 4-15-10, conforms to the recommendations of Nelson Geotechnical Associates Inc., February 12, 201.0 Geotechnical Evaluation. Specifically, elements incorporated into the Civil Design per the Geotechnical Engineering Evaluation include: • According to the structural engineer, the uphill side, east side of the garage wall is designed to act as a debris wall and grading elevations against this wall are no more than five feet above the garage finished floor. • On site silt and clay materials are not to be used as structural fill. The structural fill under the proposed driveway is depicted as imported structural fill. • Cut-off/interceptor trench is shown just east of the house. • Slope inclinations at 3(H):1(V) or shallower are shown on the Grading Plan consistent with recommendations from the geotechnical engineer. • A 2 -foot over -excavation for'footings per the geotechnical report are taken into consideration for the grading cut calculations. • Stockpiles of excavated material are not shown near the top of slope. • TESC measures are designed in accordance with Best Management Practices. In my judgment the Civil Plans and specifications prepared by me conform to the recommendations of the geotechnical engineer. Furthermore, the risk of damage to the proposed development, or to adjacent properties from soil instability will be minimized provided that the BMP's are followed and erosion control elements installed in accordance with the Civil Plans. APR- 2 6 2010 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR - CITY OF EDMONDS March 2010 City of Edmonds Edmonds, Wa Gentlemen:.. �, % S I O �! 6 2 140 ST" Ste% Qj)fl ON (QS_- - - _. We are applying for building permits in the Meadowdale Slide Area. The applicant/owner (that's us) of the site certifies that: The accuracy of all permit submittdl information is warranted by the applicant/owner in a form which relieves the City and its staff from any liability associated with reliance on such permit application submittals. While an application may reference the reports of prior public consultants to the City, all conclusions shall be those of ourselves (applicant/owner) and our design professionals. The application/owner understands and accepts the risk of developing in an area with potential unstable soils and understands the required temporary and permanent erosion control and site maintenance issues associated with specific geologic hazards or conditions of the site that may affect slope stability over time. That we will advise, in writing, any prospective purchasers of the site, or any prospective lessees of structures on the site, of the slide potential and on-going maintenance issues of the area and on the property. Michael R. Gold Nancy M.. Gold Owner/Applicant Owner/Applicant WA �r,,SKOM44 STATE OF <State,>, COUNTY OF <G94RW>, ss.: On this day, personally appeared before me c 4y)A A � . C�a� c�. ' 0(aj,�.j 1 A_ Cao L d to me known to be the person(s) described in and who Executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he/she signed the same as his/her voluntary act and deed, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned. Witness myhand and official seal hereto affixed �a•P�(.•B •ZgfFO�.`� this `V? day ofAgy C/ .n V - �Ct,7 �N�A PUBL%G,�� -Az Notary Public in and for the State of��T My commission expires 71 1201 APR 2 6 2010 DEVELOPMENTCITY OF EDMONDS REED` ASSOCIATES, PS Civil & Structural Engineering • ®� 8311 212th St. SW, Edmonds, WA 98026 S Office (425) 778-2793 Fax (425) 775-2073 March 31; 2010 Mike & Nancy Gold. 15225 14th Court SE Mill Creek, WA 98012 Subject: R&A Job # 10-128n SFR to be constructed at 7510 162nd Street SW, Edmonds, WA LEAD DESIGN PROFESSIONAL DESIGNATION AND STATEMENT (City Ordinance #2661 and #3632) Dear Mr. & Mrs. Gold, This letter is our confirmation that you have designated Reed & Associates PS as lead design professional and that we have reviewed the geotechnical reports for this project, understand its recommendations, and have incorporated into the design the established measures to reduce the potential risk of injury or damage from any earth movement predicted in the report. If any further clarification is required or you have any questions, please feel free to call this office. Sincerely, V �1 Wendell Reed P.E. CBOT a 7—co RECEIVED APR 26 2010 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS `CITy COPY ( S' C` 'r ■-' — .ter' n1-1- ; vlt .6 1 - Ugia�� rte- �-'-r,» North Edmonds. Earth Subsidence.and . r" -_f ' r ~* F Landslide Hazard Area (See.ECDC'23$0020 B 1:and EGDC 19.10) _ . (Note;-8bundanes are.theapproximate:extent. ' i (• ;;y t 1 ' :prev�ofg..hazardsare resentouslanlidin r- adjacent to the iandslide' boundaries) - >i — - ---; 1----- �-�F tom�t- � .. Slope cYf40%, orsteeper and s �r � ��—,", 'with a vertical relief-often�(1'.0) ft or more. i �= P,11 • .(See ECDG 23:80.020 9-2) Ali M.?— L;��y\.. buffer a ual to the height Minimum q S of the sleep slope or 50 feet: whichever jr.!T is greater see ECDC 23.80.070 A.1) (The buffer shown is the minimum buffer +i..• ..•-adjacent to the. North Edmonds Subsidencef t, and Landslide Hazard Area; a similar j° °. (-�j ► _ r _` buffer would apply to steep slope areas, but is not shown on this map for clarity) • - 2 ft Topographic Contourr��'� - - "' S't'.� Vertical datum: NAVD88 ' 'moi �I_ ., ,r'::'-- 1 -. •-,-'' �� \�/1" Parcel : c 7 i,; a 100 20 Scale in Feet L ( ,.I _- •---f— - .-F1. �w� _,ten. ►� 1njOicAiLS 1paC: �tT �. 1; ff�' J -`�- ` p C:�TII.S �tCrN - �1 li:. .-1- .t � ! >• v� Gt:Ot'l_Gi�i�liG�l. fi � Ea - - __ - �_�'`-_•;-._:- --- �-�_ _ :; �� _ _,.,,,,a. Li0 A -l' .s '� - y'i'p - - ' ��:-'-l"L_ -- - •-�� ? n - �flit - RECEIVED ..p Sr_=• � i.Tt l �V ,,P .a .r ...1'-..e��"c•l :fir .:us.:�-:x.r+--_ - ' APR 2 6 2010 --- DEVELOPIAENT OF DMO SERVICES CTFi CITYCovTV: COPS , z N OV EQ4t0 Inspection Comments a BLD2010031464 -Single Family Residence New Applied: 05/03/2010 Issued: 04/29/2011 Expires: 04/29/2013 10c. 0 Address: 7510 162ND ST SW, EDMONDS INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1000 - E -Pre -Con 05/02/2011 SIBREL CMP Comment: Attended: Owner, owner's contractor, geotech, civil engineer (Donna Breske), surveyor and a couple laborers. Items covered: 1) Contractor asked to bring west silt fence up the hill as not to disturb existing vegetation. Said it's okay with me if it's okay with geotech. 2) Demo of existing structure to go this week -- contractor needs to cut WSL, says the sewer is already cut/capped; 3) Landscaping: a) clearing limits do not appear to match landscape plan (claimed I didn't see landscape plan); b) there's an engr note (JL) on dwgs to not go outside limits (into ROW) -- going to have to iron that one out between JL and planning; 4) Donna wishes to regrade area in 75th ROW to lessen steep slope and increase safety, but JL in review said no -- Advised Donna to revisit the topic with Engr. Dept. 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization 05/23/2011 ZULAUF COM Comment: need to refresh temp construction entrance from 162nd. 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization 10/28/2011 MCCONNELL COR Comment: See attached correction notice. 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization 10/31/2011 ZULAUF PAR Comment: tesc not in place. Discussed with Building since rainy season. They are supposed to have a geotech or certified erosion control inspector on site but apparently don't. Building will follow up. 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization 12/05/2011 ZULAUF COM Comment: told Mike to put the sock into the cb adjacent to the driveway (it was lying next to it). Site very muddy as usual. 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization Comment: Remove silt fence 1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization Comment: Approved. 02/16/2012 LAMBERTJ COM 02/17/2012 MCCONNELL CMP 1013 - E -Storm Tightline 12/05/2011 ZULAUF COM Comment: cb between properties installed and tightline installed all the way to the cb in 162nd. Only inspected connection to cb in 162nd -all other backfilled with no inspection. Water test at final. 1013 - E -Storm Tightline 02/23/2012 LAMBERTJ CMP Comment: Contractor covered pipe prior to inspection - stated Geotech had looked at pipe; however, there is no record of this - added water to downspout to verify connection. 1014 - E -Storm Connect to Stub 02/15/2012 ZULAUF Comment: ok to b/f storm from city system to property. 1014 - E -Storm Connect to Stub Comment: Final Approved 02/15/2012 LAMBERTJ 1017 - E -Footing Drain Connection 02/23/2012 LAMBERTJ Comment: Geotech inspected the footing drains 4/13/2012 7:13:55 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 PAR CMP CMP Page 1 of 4 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1034 - E -Water Service Line 10/28/2011 MCCONNELL COR Comment: Failed. Need tracer wire and verification of PSI on pipe. See attached correction notice. 1034 - E -Water Service Line 10/31/2011 ZULAUF PAR Comment: ok to backfill -not connected at meter 1034 - E -Water Service Line 02/17/2012 MCCONNELL CMP Comment: Verified tracer wire connection per 2/15 correction. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 10/28/2011 LAMBERTJ COM Comment: Need easement for city utilities prior to final approval. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 02/16/2012 LAMBERTJ COR Comment: Correction Notice Given - See Attached 1077 - E -Engineering Final 02/17/2012 MCCONNELL COM Comment: All items on correction notice complete less: 1) Geotech report needs to be provided to City discussing storm installation. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 02/24/2012 LAMBERTJ CMP Comment: Final Approved. - geotech did not provide documentation of the storm installation as stated by contractor - added water to downspouts and cb in driveway to verify connection 1101 - B-Preconstruction meeting 05/02/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1106 - B -Setbacks 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: per survey letter David West 6/9/2011 1108 - B -Footings 06/22/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1110 - B -Foundation Wall 06/28/2011 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1112 - B -Foundation Drainage 07/01/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1114 - B -Onsite Geo -tech meeting 11/10/2011 LAWLER CMP Comment: met with contractor, geotech onsite and walked two lots. Geo will email results to inspector. 1120 - B-Geotech Reports 12/05/2011 LAWLER COM Comment: Had conversation with Mike Todd and he will get the most current geotech reports emailed and will also have the visqueen slope cover reinstalled to eliminate gaps that have developed 1120 - B-Geotech Reports 02/15/2012 LAWLER COR Comment: need final geo letter 1120 - B-Geotech Reports 04/12/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1122 - B -First Floor Framing 07/11/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1126 - B -Plumb Rough In 08/11/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 4/13/2012 7:13:55 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 2 of 4 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1128 - B -Gas Test/Pipe 09/29/2011 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In 09/30/2011 LAWLER PAR Comment: all HVAC except fireplaces 1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In 10/14/2011 STEINIKE COM Comment: Not ready 1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1132 - 13 -Exterior Sheathing 08/09/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1140 - B -Height Verification 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: per survey letter David West 10/5/2011 1142 - B -Framing 10/07/2011 STEINIKE PAR Comment: Ok to Insulate but need Height Check and Finish Dry in. 1142 - B -Framing 10/13/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 10/12/2011 STEINIKE COR Comment: Gave correction notice. 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1146 - B -Floor Insulation/Caulk 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1148 - B -Ceiling Insulation/Caulk 02/15/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 10/17/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 1158 - B -Building Final 02/16/2012 LAWLER COR Comment: Final geotech letter Engineering final approval Planning final approval Water heater seismic straps to framing not ductwork 1158 - B -Building Final 02/22/2012 LAWLER COR Comment: Planning and engineering finals required 1158 - B -Building Final 04/12/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 2000 - P -Planning Final 11/18/2010 LIEN COM Comment: Inspection of landscaping for consistency with the revegetation plan. 2000 - P -Planning Final 04/12/2012 LIEN CMP Comment: Based on the letter from the landscape architect and geotechnical reviews, planning signs of on the as planted landscaping. 4/13/2012 7:13:55 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 3 of 4 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 3000 - B -Shower Pan 11/03/2011 STEINIKE CMP Comment: 4/13/2012 7:13:55 AM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 4 of 4