bld20100457-A Plus Academy-TIA.pdfF
City of Edrnonds
'"Fraffic Irripact Analysis Worksheet
Name of Proposed Project:
Owner/Applicant
Name
Applicant Contact Person:
Name
Street/Mailin'g Address kr Street/Mailing Address
City State Zip city State Zip
- F
Telephone: - 1'.0 (P I :i2 Telephone:
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (Wapplicable):
Firm Name
Telephone:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
Traffic Levels
T. -11 A-ess than 25 peak -hour trips generated
IT. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated
a. Location - Street address: '7
Contact Name
F-rnaih
Sections to Com,Dlete
I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
All sections
(Attach a vicinity inap and site plan.)
b, Specify existing land use: _�+4�u
c. Specify proposed type and size of development:
L"L
4tu
(# of residential units andlor square L 4-- footage of bul ani)
Revi-%ed on 6124110 F82 - Trqffiv hnpact Analysis Worksheet Page / of 5
d. Date construction will begin and be completed: 'I nL-
e. Define proposed access locations: :1r)t i hila j �J
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: k 0 t'
2. TRIP GENERATION
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour
Trips
IN
OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour
Trips
IN
OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN
OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, Iink-diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 2 of 5
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in ECDC 18.82.130.
KLHANGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior.use was permitted. If the
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09112104),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used.
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
of , etc.
X l �'b �Q -
X
Fee
New Use Fee: $ � Prior Use Fee; $ �yr
NEW DEVELOPMENT
ITE Land Use Category
per Unit
Fee Rate
New Use
G y
$ 1
Prior Use
$
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
of , etc.
X l �'b �Q -
X
Fee
New Use Fee: $ � Prior Use Fee; $ �yr
NEW DEVELOPMENT
❑ OTHER
X
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION:
ITE Land Use Category
Per Unit
$
$
Fee Rate
New Use
$
❑ OTHER
X
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
vfp, etc.
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION:
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 + consultant fee
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE
$
$
Y� -9
�r
Division Approval Date
1 No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
Revised on 6124/10 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 5 of 5
j Y 3
/ •/ I � � � �.—��«�E3t4a��7 L4CALOFi
d '
/t
/ I s' `
x _ r
rf
m
a
I
`:SIT PLAN �T �. A PLUS ACA IMY
SCAi„=2�' [i” FOR Rl�E:�il�.".r.. o�J;.Y 2/27 lil"N 99 #101
EDMONDS A 95026
F._
/
j Y 3
/ •/ I � � � �.—��«�E3t4a��7 L4CALOFi
d '
/t
/ I s' `
x _ r
rf
m
a
I
`:SIT PLAN �T �. A PLUS ACA IMY
SCAi„=2�' [i” FOR Rl�E:�il�.".r.. o�J;.Y 2/27 lil"N 99 #101
EDMONDS A 95026
F._