bld20100485-Dr. Kitts-TIA.pdfCity of Edmonds
Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet
Name of Proposed PrRiect: tch"L CFFI Of" M6, VAT(151 W5
0
Telephone
Telephone: 200.15-/va.02-M
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable):
Contact Marne
Firm Name
im
11. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated I All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location -Street address
a vicinity map, and site plan.)
Revised an 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impacl Ana�ysis Worksheet Page 1 of'5
d. Date construction will begin and be completed: 16 (o -St
e. Define proposed access locations: NUAN aim SPACE
jS�Vl,�jsT.��,Nc� ONLY.
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: tRMWA OT WbEj>
_FW -M TEA41l .�
2. TRIP GENERATION — N/,4
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
Daily (ADT)
PM Peak -Hour Trips
IN
OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
PM Peak -Hour
Daily (ADT) IN
Trips
OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
Land Use
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Daily (ADT) IN OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6/24/10 E82 - Trak Impact Analysis Worksheel Page 2 of 5
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION N /A
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For
developments that generate over 75 peals -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.'
4. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY �_ N/A
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Trqffic Engineer
Existing Conditions
LOS
95 %
Delays
Year of Opening
LOS
Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
Five Years Beyond Change of
LOS
Delays
Land Use
c. Describe channelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 % queuing lengths):
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on. 6124/I0 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5
50%
95 %
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
2 Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on. 6124/I0 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 3 of 5
5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES — NIA
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city.
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peals -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS — 1q/A
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peals -hour trips. Other City -planned developments must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revises! on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5
LOS
LOS
Existing Conditions
Existing
Delays
Year of Opening
With Project
Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
With Project
Without Project
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
1 A list of planned developments are available at the City upon request for public records
Revises! on 6124110 E82 - Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 of 5
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds load Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.12.0, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in ECDC 18.82.130.
CHANGE IN USE
Fee for prior use shall be bused on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 35 16 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.1.20 impact fee shall be used.
Units in
ITE Land Use Category per Unit square feet,
Fee Rate #k of dwelling,
of , etc.
New Use _
1Prior Use a $ 3 X
Ee:wu:se Fee: prior Use Fee: —
11 NEW DEVELOPMENT
Units in
ITE Land Use Category per Unit square feet,
Fee Rate ## of dwelling,
of , etc.
New Use
lar
City of I ri%6tld , { ngir eering Division Approval Date
' No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net. negative.
Revised on 6124110 1:82 - Traffic hipactAna1yis Worksheet Page 5 of 5
m T
41
any
m T