BLD-2011-0059 SEPA MDNS and checklist.pdfOF EDIV
O
V N I ■
FSf 1g90 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH, EDMONDS, WA 98020 (425) 771-0220
RCW 197-11-970 Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS)
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE
Description of proposal: This project involves replacing an existing residential bridge across North
Stream. A 14 foot wide by 70 foot long wooden bridge supported by four concrete piers with spread
footings having a mid -span of 30 feet crosses perpendicular to the stream flow and provides access to the
property from the street. The existing wood bridge has been removed. A precast concrete bridge will be
set on precast concrete abutment footings located to the outside of the existing concrete piers. While the
stream channel itself will be unchanged by this project, stream buffer enhancements are proposed. (File
No. BLD -2011-0059)
Proponent: Martin Schmitz
Location of proposal, including street address if any: 870 Northstream Lane, Edmonds,
Washington. Tax parcel #00532500001800.
Lead agency: City of Edmonds
The lead agency has determined that the requirements for environmental analysis and protection have
been adequately addressed in the development regulations and comprehensive plan adopted under
chapter 36.70A RCW, and in other applicable local, state, or federal laws or rules, as provided by RCW
43.21C.240 and WAC 197-11-158 and/or mitigating measures have been applied that ensure no
significant adverse impacts will be created.
An environmental impact statement is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was
made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead
agency. This information is available to the public on request.
There is no comment period for this DNS.
XX This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14
days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by June 14, 2011.
Project Planner: Mike Clugston, AICP, Associate Planner
Responsible Official: Robert Chave, Planning Manager
Position/Title: Manager - Planning Division
Phone: 425-771-0220
Address: City of Edmonds, 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA 98020
Date: June 1 2011 Signature:
XX You may appeal this determination to Robert Chave at 121 5th Avenue North, Edmonds, WA
98020, by filing a written appeal citing the specific reasons for the appeal with the required
appeal fee, adjacent property owners list and notarized affidavit form no later than June 21,
2011. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. Contact Rob Chave to
read or ask about the procedures for SEPA appeals.
XX Posted on June 1, 2011, at the Edmonds Public Library, the Edmonds Public Safety
Building, and the Edmonds Community Services Building and published in the Everett Herald.
XX Emailed to the Department of Ecology along with a copy of the SEPA Checklist.
Page I of 2
SEPA MDNS BLD-2011-0059.DOC
5/26/1 LSEPA
XX MITIGATING MEASURES INCORPORATED INTO THE PROPOSAL:
THE PROJECT MUST COMPLY WITH ALL CITY OF EDMONDS CRITICAL AREAS
REGULATIONS (EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TITLE 23
"NATURAL RESOURCES"). SPECIFICALLY, THE MITIGATION MEASURES
IDENTIFIED IN: 1) THE "SCHMITZ PROPERTY CRITICAL AREAS REPORT —
WETLANDS AND STREAMS" PLAN PREPARED BY HART CROWSER, INC. DATED
APRIL 2011, AND 2) THE "GEOTECHNICAL REPORT — SCHMITZ BRIDGE
REPLACEMENT" PREPARED BY THE GALLI GROUP DATED JULY 2009, MUST BE
IMPLEMENTED.
Mailed notice of the SEPA Determination to property owners within 300 and to the following agencies:
Attachments
SEPA Notebook
Page 2 of 2
SEPA MDNS BLD-2011-0059.DOC
5/26/1 LSEPA
XX Snohomish County Planning &
XX
COMCAST
Development Services
Engineer, North Region
Outside rlant En g g
3000 Rockefeller
1525 751 St SW Ste 200
Everett, WA 98201
Everett, WA 98203
XX National Marine Fisheries Service
XX
Department of Fish &Wildlife
p
Northwest Regional Office
16018 Mill Creek Boulevard
7600 Sand Point Way NE
Mill Creek, WA 98012
Seattle, WA 98115-0070
XX
Puget Sound Partnership
XX Donna J. Bunten
P.O. Box 40900
Olympia, WA 98504-0900
Department of Ecology
Shorelands & Environ. Assist. Program
XX
DNR SEPA Center
PO Box 47600
P.O. Box 47015
Olympia, WA 98504-7600
Olympia, WA 98504-7015
XX US Army Corps of Engineers
XX
Puget Sound Regional Council
Regulatory Branch
Attn.: S.R.C.
PO Box 3755
1011 Western Avenue, Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98124-3755
Seattle, WA 98104-1035
Attachments
SEPA Notebook
Page 2 of 2
SEPA MDNS BLD-2011-0059.DOC
5/26/1 LSEPA
9
Oy.
Schmitz Bridge Replacement
BLD -2011-0059
870 Northstream Lane
Edmonds, WA 99020
PUGET DR
Zoning and Vicinty Map
1 inch = 150 feet
H
OF EDAIO #P71
CITY OF EDMONDS
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
Purpose of Checklist:
The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21C RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental
impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for'all proposals with
probable significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help
you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to
help the agency decide whether an EIS is required.
Instructions for Applicants:
This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this
checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer
the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can.
You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer
the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer, or
if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or does not apply". Complete answers to the questions now may
avoid unnecessary delays later.
Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if
you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you.
The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of
land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you
submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there
may be significant adverse impact.
Use of checklist for nonproject proposals:
Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." IN ADDITION,
complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (part D).
For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as
"proposer," and "affected geographic area," respectively.
A. BACKGROUND
1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Schmitz Residential Bridge Replacement
2. Name of applicant: Martin W. Schmitz
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Martin W. Schmitz (206) 949-3657
P.O. Box 1722, Edmonds, WA 98020
4. Date checklist prepared: 01/22/2011
5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Edmonds
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 1 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
7.
8.
9.
Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
03/01/2011 through 06/01/2011
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Do ,you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this
proposal? If yes, explain.
No plans for future development.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related
to this proposal.
No environmental information prepared for project at this time.
STAFF COMM 4 NTS , �'rn x �, � . " . ;b it -_ 7""r
Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting
the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
No applications are pending.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised o)7 4/20/10 Page 2 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) / Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11, Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and size of the project and site.
There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You
do not need to repeat those answers on this page.
Project site is a one story single family residence with daylight basement, exterior patios and paved driveway located in a residential neighborhood.
A 4 foot wide stream located in a valley approximately 10 to 15 feet deep runs parallel with the street and separates the residential structures from the street.
A 14 foot wide by 70 foot long wooden bridge supported by 4 concrete piers with spread footings having a mid span of 30 feet crosses perpendicular
to the stream flow and provides access to the property from the street. The existing wood bridge has been removed. A precast concrete bridge will be set
on precast concrete abutment footings located to the outside of the existing concrete piers. The stream channel will be unchanged by this project.
Previous permits: Stream bank restoration to the East of the bridge was completed in November, 2003. Hydraulic Project Approval (HPA) permit was
granted pursuant to RCW 77.55.100 by the State of Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 4 Office. Permit number: 00-F3171-01, Issued
February 5, 2002. SEPA exempt status was determined for previous stream bank restoration activities.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your
proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal
would occur over a range of area, provide range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide legal description, site plan,
vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the
agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related
to this checklist.
Street address: 870 Northstream Lane, Edmonds, WA 98020
% Section: SW'/, Section: 13, Township: 27N, Range: 03E, Snonomish County Parcel Number: 00532500001800
Parcel Legal Description: NORTHSTREAM LANE BLK 000 D-00 - LOT 18 SUBJ ESE PUD 1 -WEST COAST TELE
Latitude: 47.49'23.00" N lat, Longitude: 122.22'03.50" W long
Attachments: Vicinity Map, City of Edmonds Zoning Map 2008-11-18, Snohomish County Assessors Office Parcel Map
City of Edmonds Inventory Maps; 4.0-1, Potential Frequently Flooded Areas, Streams, and Wetlands
6.0-1 Potential Geographically Hazardous Areas, 7.0-1 Potential Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Areas
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Remised on 4/20/10 Page 3 of 24 P71 - SFPA Checklist
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
B. ENVIRONMENTAL ELEMENTS
1. Earth
a. General description of the site (circle one): Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other:
Per Topographical Survey:
Lot has gentle slope from East property line (76 foot elevation) to West property line (68 foot elevation).
Stream bed channel deepens from East property line (70 foot elevation) to West property line (52 foot elevation).
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
Per Geotechnical Report:
Slopes on the North and South side of the stream West of bridge are inclined at about 50 to 60 percent.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, and muck)? If you
know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland.
Per Geotechnical Report:
Based on site reconnaissance and subsurface investigation the project site is underlain by dense silty
sand with gravel, representative of Olympia gravel unit classification.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
No indications of unstable soils.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 4 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
e. Describe the purpose, type and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source
of fill.
Approximately 4 feet of topsoil will be removed in areas of new bridge abutment placement to expose native
dense soils suitable for bridge foundation. Abutment backfill and bridge approaches will use free draining
material such as City of Seattle Standard 'Type 17" soils.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
No erosion should occur as a result of construction. The stream bed is 4 feet wide and new abutments will
have a span of 48 feet with the stream centered within abutments. Backwall drainage system will include 4
inch perforated pipe enveloped in washed gravel and wrapped in Mirafi 140N filter fabric.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for
example, asphalt or buildings)?
Impervious surface coverage of site will remain unchanged from pre -construction surface coverage.
Structures = 3,245 sq/ft; Cement Patios = 885 sq/ft; Driveways = 2,100 sq/ft
Total Coverage = 6,230 sq/ft; Total Lot Area = 18,970 sq/ft; Surface Coverage %= 32.84 %
(STAFF COMMENTS)
III
2. AIR
a.
Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Activities will adhere to section 18.30.050 of City of Edmonds Storm Water Management code.
Maintain generous cover of fertile mulch on stream slopes to retard runoff.
Storm basins will be protected with straw wattles where runoff possible.
(STAFF COMMENTS) a R �a . �; 0 ._ f� �1 o()e 6
4ur,, —.
What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, automobile, odors, and
industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe
and give approximate quantities if known.
Possibility of slight dust during excavation for abutments to be mitigated by maintaining street and
driveways free of sediment during excavation. No air emissions after project completion.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 5 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may effect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No off-site sources of emissions.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to the, if any:
No measures planned.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
3. WATER
a. Surface:
(1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and
seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, and wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names.
If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Northstream stream, a year-round spring fed stream flows East to West across the property from
the Maplewood Park area terminating in Puget Sound. The average stream width is four feet with an
average depth of six inches.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If
yes, please describe and attach available plans.
Yes, a precast concrete bridge will be placed spanning the existing stream bed.
See Bridge Structure General Notes #1, #2 and site plan for work sequence details.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface
water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill
material.
No fill or dredge material to be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 6 of24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description,
purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No water withdrawls or diversions required.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Property is located within Zone X of FEMA flood insurance map 53061 C1305 E, Panel 1305.
This area is determined to be outside 500 year floodplain.
See attachments: FEMA National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the
type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No discharges of waste material to surface waters.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Ground:
(1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general
description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No water withdrawn or discharged.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 7 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if
any (for example: Domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural;
etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to
be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Water Runoff (including storm water):
(1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any
(include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters?
If so, describe.
No water runoff.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)�a I �F i (� � , p ,7 i. i ,� a �w...
P w
Remised on 4/20/10 Page 8 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
4. Plants
a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site:
X deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other:
X evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other:
X shrubs
grass
pasture
crop or grain
wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage, other:
water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other:
other types of vegetation:
(STAFF COMM
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 9 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other materials to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site,
if any:
None. Existing landscaping will remain unchanged.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
5. Animals
a.
Check or circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or
near the site:
X birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, other:
mammals: deer, bear, elk, beaver, other:
(STAFF COMM
b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 10 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
6. Energy and Natural Resources
a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed
project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally
describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed
measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 11 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
7. Environmental Health
a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and
explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so describe.
No.
(1) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Noise
(1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment,
operation, other)?
None. Location is residential.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 12 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
(2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or
a long-term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hour's noise
would come from the site.
Installation of bridge will require trucking delivery of pre -cast concrete bridge segments to work site.
Crane will be located at driveway entrance on street for approximately 8 hours .
(STAFF COMMENTS)
(3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
8. Land and Shoreline Use
a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties?
Residential.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 13 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
C. Describe any structures on the site.
Single family residence with daylight basement.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)� diAlu ) .f;, �...„�) part° aoa
�, . .
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
Single family, residential.
(STAFF COMMENTS) .. � '. 4`10"41!4 )°' —
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
Single family, residential.
(STAFF COMMENTS)1, p-
r � ��(a��
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master plan designation of the site?
Not in designated area.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 14 01'24 P71 - SEP11 Checklist
h.
I
j.
k.
Has any part of the site been classified as an "environmentally sensitive" area? If so, specify
Critical Area Checklist determination as of 1/21/1999 indicates:
Wetland present. Part of critical area inventory. Environmentally sensitive area.
SIL
(STAFF COMMENTS)+` o-. 1"�'(✓,
�" ' " '� .. i i° t, ,t.. i/V
Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
None.
STAFF COMMENTS
Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected Iand uses and plans, if
any:
Compliance with all City of Edmonds and HPA conditions.
Critical areas regulations: Edmonds Community Development Code title 23: Natural Resources.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4120110 Page 15 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
9. Housing
a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Approximately how many units, if any would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low-income
housing.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
10. Aesthetics
a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principle
exterior building material(s) proposed?
Bridge railing at 42" above bridge deck if applicable.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 16 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
11. Light and Glare
a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 17 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
12. Recreation
a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Edmonds city parks, Puget Sound.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreation uses? If so, describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be
p.rovided by the project or applicant, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 18 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
13. Historic and Cultural Preservation
a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers
known to be on or next to the site? If so, generally describe.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance
known to be on or next to the site.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
14. Transportation
a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe proposed access to the existing street
system. Show on site plans, if any.
Northstream Lane, Edmonds WA. Residential street.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 19 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
b. Is site currently served by public transit? If no, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit
stop?
Yes, Community Transit bus, approximately 4 blocks to the South.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
C. How many parking spaces would the completed project have? How many would the project eliminate?
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
d. Will the proposal require any new roads, streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not
including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so,
generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20/10 Page 20 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when
peak volumes would occur.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
15. Public Services
a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police
protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any:
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
Revised on 4/20110 Page 21 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist
16. Utilities
a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone,
sanitary sewer, septic system, other:
(electricity), (natural gas), (water), (refuse service), (telephone), (sanitary sewer), (cable)
(STAFF COMMENTS)
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general
construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
None.
(STAFF COMMENTS)
I declare under penalty of perjury laws that the above answers are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I understand
that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
s
01/22/2011
Signature of Proponent Date Submitted
Rerised on 4/20/10 Page 22 of 24 P71 - SEPA Checklist