BLD20110243.pdfSTATUS: ISSUED 7/7/2011
Expiration Date: 7/7/44.5:
Parcel No: 00914200000800
CITY OF EDMONDS
121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020
PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FARC: (425) 771-0221
Permit #: BLD2011
Project Address: 17804 VISTA DEL MAR DR,(
EDMONDS]
ANN WILLIAMS SCOTT MILLER KEARSLEY HOMES
21800 NOOTKA RD 10777 MAIN ST # 104 ROBIN KEARSLEY
WOODWAY, WA 98020- BELLEVUE, WA 98004- 6631 NORMA BEACH RD
EDMONDS, WA 98026
(425) 772-8965 Ext. ► (425) 455-5549 Ext. - (425) 742-5888 EXT:
LICENSE #: KEARSH1005NH EXP: 10/23/2011
JOB DESCRIPTION
NEW SFR
VALUATION: $528,540.00 COMPLL T5toD
PERMIT TYPE: Residential
PERMIT GROUP: 64 - Single Family Residence New
GRADING: Y CYDS: 370
TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB
RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: Y
OCCUPANT GROUP: R3
OCCUPANT LOAD:
FENCE: N 0 X 0 FT.
CODE: 2009
OTHER: N ----- OTHER DESC:
ZONE: RS -12
NUMBER OF STORIES: 0
VESTED DATE:
NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 0
LOT #:
BASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0
BASEMENT: 2301 1 ST FLOOR: 2501 2ND FLOOR: 0
3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0
3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 610 DECK: 395 OTHER: 334
FRONTSETBACK
REQUIRED: E 25 PROPOSED: 31 RE UIRED: N 10 PROPOSED: 10.25 REUIRED: W 25 PROPOSED: 25+
HEIGHT ALLOWED:25 PROPOSED:24.96 I REQUIRED: S 10 PROPOSED: 10.5
SETBACK NOTES:
1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO
PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S
COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27.
THIS APPLICAT)ON IS NOTA PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS/HER DEPJe6LY AND,, ALL FEES ARE PAID.
(,&/.-&/lzmz--r 1417/1h),//ams 7-7-2-vr/ 7r) l-MOi- WJIV�-7/7/11
Signature Print Name
ATTENTION
IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF
OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC 109/ IBCI 10/ IRC110.
= ONLINE = APPLICANT
= ASSESSOR
eVc (0[s
WN I .fr
STATUS: ISSUED
• Separate Permit Required For:
BLD2O11O243
• Residential Fire Sprinkler
• State Electrical
• 1) Critical area protection and mitigation associated with this project will be done in accordance with the report from Nelson
Geotechnical Associates (February 11, 2011) and their clarifying letter dated June 17, 2011.
• 2) Vegetation within the'limits of site disturbance line' as identified on the associated Grading and Erosion and Control Plan
may be removed as part of this permit. After this project is complete and the site is stabilized, no trees or vegetation may be
cut or removed from the site without an approved permit and restoration plan, except as allowed in ECDC 18.45.030 and
ECDC 23.40.220.C.7, as amended.
• Lot line stakes must be in place at the time of foundation/setback inspection.
• Installer shall provide the manufacturer's installation, operating instructions, and a whole house ventilation system operation
description. A label shall be affixed to the whole house timer control that reads "Whole House Ventilation" (see operating
instructions).
• Maximum Height 25 feet. The agent/contractor shall set up the equipment; establish the datum point and the point of average
grade. Call for inspection to verify. These items must be consistent with the approved plan. If the proposed height of a
building (as shown on the plans) is within 12 inches of the maximum height permitted for the zone an elevation survey is
required.
• Special inspections have been called for on this project and are noted on the approved construction plans and building permit.
It is the owner and/or contractors responsibility to assure that reports are provided to the City on a weekly basis. Be advised—
if special inspection reports are not forthcoming, the Building Official may issue a "Stop Work" and no City inspections will
be provided until such time as the reporting agency has complied and reports are reviewed and approved by the City.
• Hose Bibbs (exterior faucets) are required to have a permanently affixed anti -siphon device installed.
• In addition to the required pressure/relief valve, an approved listed expansion tank shall be installed on all hot water tanks.
Per UPC 608.
• Obtain Electrical Permit from State Department of Labor & Industries. 425-290-1309
• Gas pipe test must be observed by City Building Inspector, affidavits shall not be accepted.
• Submit all special inspection reports to the City Building Inspector on a weekly basis.
• Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of
the building or structure. Check the job card for all required City inspections including final project approval and final
occupancy inspections.
• Provide combustion air per IMC Chapter 7 for commercial and multi -family residential installations, and IRC Chapter 17 for
one and two-family dwellings.
• Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from
adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing
fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable.
• Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been
specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision
of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification.
• Pursuant to UPC 608 a pressure regulator valve (PRV) shall be installed near the water shutoff.
• Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits
of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:OOam to 6:OOpm on weekdays and 10:OOam and 6:OOpm on Saturdays,
excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activities must
comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120.
• Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold
harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of
whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance for this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to
modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any City ordinance nor limit in any.way the City's ability to enforce any
ordinance provision.
• REQUIRED SPECIAL INSPECTIONS FOR THIS PROJECT:
• 1) Excavation, grading, & site preparation
• 2) Soil bearing verification
• 3) Placement of fill & compaction
0 4) Footing drain
• 5) Temporary Erosion Control
• 6) Final Erosion Control
• 7) Site retaining wall/ rockery construction.
• 8) General site monitoring
• 9) Final letter from geotechnical engineer of record
INSPECTIONS
THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE
PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION.
PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6)
BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 1 ENGINEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 1 FIRE (425) 775-7720
PUBLIC WORKS 425) 771-0235 PRE-TREATMENT 425) 672-5755 RECYCLING 425) 275-4801
When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection
being requested, Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon.
• E -Erosion Control/Mobilization
• E -Storm Tightline
• E -Storm Connect to Stub
• E -Footing Drain Connection
• E -Water Service Line
• E -Driveway Form & Slope Ver.
• E -Retaining Wall Drainage
• E -Engineering Final
• B-Preconstruction meeting
• B -Setbacks
• B -Footings
• B -Foundation Wall
• B -Foundation Drainage
• B -Basement Wall Dampproofing
• B -Slab Insulation
• B -Plumb Ground Work
• B -Basement Wall Dampproofing
• B -Plumb Rough In
• B -Gas Test/Pipe
• B -Mechanical Rough In
• 13 -Exterior Wall Sheathing
• B -Roof Sheathing
• B -Shear Nailing
• B -Height Verification
• B -Framing
• B -Wall Insulation/Caulk
• 13-Insulation/Energy
• B-Sheetrock Nail
• B -Building Final
• F -Fire Sprinkler Acceptance
• X -Special Inspection
• E-Tightline Drain Connection
4
m
N
Q
m
d
m
O
v
c
m
CL
0
0
0
0
d
Of
C
�o
s
T
a`
O
Z,*
d
14
E}
N
O
a
v
N
r
&Z !t
W
d
m
CODco
N
c O
`
p
w
v
N
!V
J
M
E
R w' H
m
T
d O V
M
L
'#
RN
t
'7
a
CL
C
3.2
= CL
7
L
C
E
0
c
Q
E
CL
=
Z
Im .
c
N - , . ^
7 N
_ A3x., A
M
0, _ d
W <r,Ym
GS
N
.O
0.
Z;O:
Q Nq
lk
Y
U. +s+ Q
r
E�
�l
LL
t
d O Q
O
K7
''0•J
d
Q
•�
cS�
V
I, Z in
AW,_.
A
y w
w Z
C
N
E
o
d
�s
4
0
Z
Q
O
a L
F- dw
a
N
_-
wQ
}
m
N
Q
m
d
m
O
v
c
m
CL
0
0
0
0
d
Of
C
�o
s
T
a`
O
Z,*
d
W
E}
a
v
d
R
o
&Z !t
W
m
CODco
N
c O
`
p
w
v
!V
M
E
R w' H
T
d O V
V c c
RN
t
CL
C
3.2
= CL
7
E
0
c
Q
d d V
=
O
M
N
GS
N
N
L
N N
E d O
Y
U. +s+ Q
r
c
c
d O Q
d
C
•�
cS�
V
v
A
y w
C
N
E
o
d
�s
4
0
Z
Q
O
a L
F- dw
m
N
Q
m
d
m
O
v
c
m
CL
0
0
0
0
d
Of
C
�o
s
T
a`
Inspection
Comments
BLD20110243
64 - Single Family Residence New
PERMITTRA'K
Applied: 04/08/2011
Issued: 07/07/2011
Expires:
07/07/2013
Address: 17804 VISTA DEL MAR DR, EDMONDS
INSPECTION
DATE
INSPECTOR
ACTION
1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization
08/11/2011
LAMBERTJ
PAR
Comment: TESC adequate at this time.
1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization
12/07/2012
ZULAUF
PAR
Comment: ok
1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: see attached cn
1001 - E -Erosion Control/Mobilization
02/19/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: ok at final
1013 - E -Storm Tightline
09/20/2011
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: T/I already covered. Geotechnical -ok to b/f. Water test at final.
1013 - E -Storm Tightline
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: need as built and geotechnical report
1013 - E -Storm Tightline
02/19/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: done
1014 - E -Storm Connect to Stub
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: ok at final
1017 - E -Footing Drain Connection
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: ok at final
1034 - E -Water Service Line
12/21/2011
LAMBERTJ
PAR
Comment: OK to backfill - water service
line is sleeved - Tracer wire installed - verify grounding at
final inspection
1034 - E -Water Service Line
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: see cn
1034 - E -Water Service Line
02/19/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: done
1044 - E -Driveway Form & Slope Ver.
11/14/2012
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: Inspected subgrade. Driveway will be worked to approx. 19.6%. Waiver letter is to 18% so will need to
submit a new letter.
1044 - E -Driveway Form & Slope Ver.
12/07/2012
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: Completed driveway under 20%
slope. Approval letter states 18 -
20 %.
1054 - E -Retaining Wall Drainage
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: NO WALL CONSTRUCTED
1077 - E -Engineering Final
02/04/2013
ZULAUF
COM
Comment: SEE ATTACHED CORRECTION NOTICE
2/21/2013 9:55:42 AM Page 1 of 3
INSPECTION
DATE
INSPECTOR
ACTION
1077 - E -Engineering Final
02/19/2013
ZULAUF
CMP
Comment: ok to final
1101 - B-Preconstruction meeting
07/11/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment:
1106 - B -Setbacks
08/11/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment: Letter from surveyor.
1108 - B -Footings
08/11/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment:
1110 - B -Foundation Wall
09/06/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment:
1112 - B -Foundation Drainage
09/15/2011
STEINIKE
PAR
Comment: Ok pending geotech special Inspection.
1112 - B -Foundation Drainage
02/19/2013
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1114 - B -Basement Wall Dampproofing
09/26/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment:
1118 - B -Slab Insulation
07/02/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment: By Russ
1120 - B -Plumb Ground Work
09/27/2011
STEINIKE
CMP
Comment:
1126 - B -Plumb Rough In
12/22/2011
LAWLER
PAR
Comment: Fernco at sewer connection approved
1126 - B -Plumb Rough In
05/10/2012
LAWLER
PAR
Comment: Approved with question at master bath
1126 - B -Plumb Rough In
06/07/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1128 - B -Gas Test/Pipe
04/04/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment: Gas piping approved, could not locate inspection card, will sign
at next trip.
1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In
05/10/2012
LAWLER
PAR
Comment: Approved except living room fireplace not
complete
1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In
06/21/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1132 - 13 -Exterior Wall Sheathing
01/11/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1133 - B -Roof Sheathing
04/23/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1136 - B -Shear Nailing
04/19/2012
LAWLER
COR
Comment: provide shear transfer connections at top and bottom of shear walls. Straps not to be bent, but plumb.
2/21/2013 9:55:42 AM Page 2 of 3
INSPECTION DATE
INSPECTOR
ACTION
1136 - B-Shear Nailing 04/23/2012
LAWLER
PAR
Comment: Except panel back side of mechanical room and basement bottom
plate nailing
1136 - B-Shear Nailing 06/21/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1140 - B-Height Verification 06/18/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment: per survey letter
1142 - B-Framing 04/19/2012
LAWLER
COR
Comment: intended interior shearwall inspection
1142 - B-Framing 06/07/2012
LAWLER
COR
Comment: 1.) provide mechanical ventilation to crawl space
2.) okay to install shear panels to backside of basement mechanical
room
3.) follow point loads from second floor to footings
4.) height check by surveyor
5.) EOR to address notches in bottom chord of girder truss at MBR
6.) okay to insulate
1142 - B-Framing 06/21/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1144 - B-Wall Insulation/Caulk 06/21/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1146 - B-Insulation/Energy 02/19/2013
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 07/02/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1152 - B-Hydronic Piping Test 05/30/2012
LAWLER
CMP
Comment: Inspection card not available but hydronic piping test approved
1156 - B-Mechanical Final 01/31/2013
LAWLER
PAR
Comment: Per-final walk through
1156 - B-Mechanical Final 02/19/2013
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
1158 - B-Building Final 02/19/2013
LAWLER
CMP
Comment: K
1930 - F-Fire Sprinkler Acceptance 02/20/2013
SMITHM
CMP
Comment: APPROVED
3004 - X-Special Inspection 02/21/2013
LAWLER
CMP
Comment:
2/21/2013 9:55:42 AM Page 3 of 3
Y X Y a 14Iu NILE FABRIC CH EQUIV. -25' WN.
m (OPRONAL-PER SITE CONDITION)
b BJRY Dorm OF FLTER YATEFm W r
X 12' TRENCH
II -Il I
� YAA]MIY
b
1HPDPD SITE
T INSPECTOR
CyI t%vM�ti1 , w,6clto;u,
o(.iN� �tJ � W I UW IaM h
21`?cn i���"fI�A RD
�+IuNVh, k1P g6o2v
ALTER FABRIC YATEMAL 4•-6 QUARRY SPALLS �
J s tA..A - ooGz �
14aO 5oa
'RINE: ANGLE SILT FENCE RACK UP THE N, � CEO-TEI� FABRIC
NRovrc iLLL IS AREA
SLOPE AT TIE ELT OF RUN. b §�
W- hIZIi = l-7/ 47a� - Lo -� voikFSR. Mkx-
BACI U VM NATIVE SOL "MIR' Y01. 11aCIDESR
OR GRAVEL BAC U0 O TRENCH AND
ON BOTH SDES OF FENCE
FABRIC ON TSURFACE AP
PRO Y GINEERIfNG
OQUR DF10 PlA' NTNG SINIPS USED 11TIF % � P .IF IC SITE IBTH Afl/Ef TRAFFIC �� G.
ASON: INTERCEPT ,�5 CDETAVg WwRN. m IEaFw4Uxi�oan OF 04EEET FLM R"' 'REASON: AHC ROAD$ REDUCE BY NOTCR MOUNT IF �' ° �0
2ol1-UZLf3 /J 1,11`` !/ 1"F �C � � BINlINR! MfND1bW
'Lone �S_ " I��'�r I l�,0•1.� --D-
i AM ate
% ' ens =co ��
Setbacks R red S k-n�.� -� s►-r� ati
Front C "Ay,�Ne r� P-„a�Mrs-
Sides Jq 0
I�
2S' kr-
Rear W 0611Z ZS° APPROl��E v FILM, G
Other _ --------
Height
----- -
-_-------
rwlmKog F:�Ii,-JIW944 z 0,
Zoo _op I,A-LJ )S -,N
I i I
Io 6411S�klAR
ilNlo' _ _ ILfS{;f'llzFdT -:..- :::rr•:. -;.�"� :;....• �� � I
NORTH
I4o\µ1o17ar HrSEW7.1e ^\ I
BGhrMC+ /l i' I
to %'• f �
P,01 Lrr
(o�N �-&f /i \\ I.00II'Tjaf•�i
3,
LEFS110
�T nor:
Tp fA or
r m
�-r�+l �r6Tti
r IFI V)6fip Oct N Arra
15.8. ���b 'G' � � � � ° h1NdR ua, • o "
.%Iger: ,�'�•�� :Z -15S. ... ,. ...n.�a.�o
NQ "
v. v ,A ISLS �r�m'RVF lip
a ®mama
r. coram+ r011ewrAmrF:
n NNw _
.. _ .V O NfYOKi<awLL A1lof. llfla m is F1�6
Q' I :AR-OV1wI A.M C�ii >I/ Na[lFA'
AM A,mv-r rAMNOn NNa szm
I60 a�awrarWrrAaIB`mr N mam as aw Amror+
�Vy ,E. emxvr "m°Oct nN°�wa1pOi arulvnmdm•.m
JRN[� lA<r 6YOf ld rleHNKa 11.,9p1 lI M4WRII"
IoOL ATn-IES, J�X \ �rNr w.r. rl0 ` No��v we mmor�r.Nsr. mtDrry
.17a 1 I*a// • omuirr a xmo taco v.NrmaNwrn.mNn-
� "I6 �� �' llrNrArtrRR1N mNF� aorADQNNY[LYNrnP
IO:�rrr �!). ...'�..: •:.. � / rec Na9IR NNLJ
�F1�JZ)'I'fit1T Ir.� LI� ��NmDry A ��mrrsriu°rr A'�o,xsa:° wu
a'^�T-I A,mLLRT.�V /JL9Fl0'L[(iF6fCC ,m LnAae
_ Rv '� - r'�orFr.¢ a�Rsa rmrruaruo l+¢-sxumc
a�e4�U�
_ 42l US :1C..�;� cemrarua®r xr.sue..vm.owYx.rAi.m.xRrmOrfiFme�
pn
5Y. Tz Zspl
L 'F r
bNo
307
-r_
41 5P
Z9-7
fs/
311 sr
' g. F�aiD,7'v.awmirswccRirts ,
ROa RY STAAWDS m<N
RESUB
' �61
JUN y�1 2011
�fOiTC A!Il.LE
�iUILDIPdr� D6PARG AQENT . t�T ; of '•-�I,(-�a:
n47p= al•4"� - /(r MII.iX�2 KI"ff'�9
,Z,6 ssy. G!TY Opt LVOMO NDS `� _- -
,xyT lcr Cav
OF EDk
o�� SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT
U N
Permit #: Odd 9'3 Project:
Fsr. 189
Prior to issuance of a permit, this form must be completed in its entirety and returned to the Cityfor
approval. The completed form must have signatures of acknowledgment by all parties.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Special Inspection Firm and Special Inspectors:
The Special Inspection firm of /VEL56A/ &eo mQg1Vtcn L iitiSAG/ 5 will perform special
inspection for the following types of work (separate forms must'be submitted if more than one firm is to be -
employed):
❑ Reinforced Concrete
❑ Bolting in Concrete
❑ Prestressed Concrete
❑ Shotcrete
❑ Structural Masonry
❑ Structural Steel/Welding
❑ High Strength Bolting
❑ Spray applied Fireproofing
❑ Smoke Control Systems
❑ Lateral Wood
❑ Structural Observation
Grading/soils
❑ Other
❑ Other
All individual inspectors to be employed on this project will be WABO certified for the type of work they are to
inspect. If inspection is for work that is not covered by the WABO categories, or the inspector is not WABO
certified, a detailed resume of the inspector and firm must be submitted. The resume must show that the
inspector and the firm are qualified by education and experience to perform the work and testing required by the
project design and specifications.
The work shall be inspected for conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. Revisions
and addenda sheets will not be used for inspection, unless they have been approved by the City. Inspection
records shall include:
A daily record to be maintained on site, itemizing the inspections performed.. Any nonconforming work
shall be brought to the immediate attention of the contractor for resolution.
A weekly report shall be submitted to the City; detailing the inspections and testing performed, listing
any nonconforming work and resolution of nonconforming items.
A final report shall be submitted to the building department prior to the Certificate of Occupancy being
issued. This report will indicate that inspection and testing was completed in conformance with the
approved plans, specifications and approved revisions or addenda. Any unresolved discrepancies must
be detailed in the final report.
LABuilding New Folder 2010\Forms\Special inspection fonn.docl0/2512010
S % k01-
RECEPIVED
C()PY
JUN 2.3 2011
BUILDING DEPART°EA)
CITY OF EDMOtJDS
r.
V
Contractor:
The contractor shall provide the special inspector or agency adequate notification of work requiring inspection.
The City approved plan and specifications must be made available, at the jobsite for the use of the special
inspector and the City inspector. The contractor shall maintain all daily inspection reports, on site, for review by
all parties.
The special inspection functions are considered to be in addition to the normal inspections performed by the City
and the contractor is responsible for contacting the City to schedule regular inspections. No concrete shall be
poured or other work'covered until approval is given by the City inspector.
Building Department:
The building department shall review any revisions and addenda. The City inspector will monitor the special
inspection functions for compliance with the agreement and the approved plans. The City inspector shall be
responsible for approving various stages of construction to be covered and for work to proceed.
Design Professionals:
The architect and/or engineer will clearly indicate on the plans and specifications the specific types of special
inspection required. and shall include a schedule for inspection and testing. The architect and/or engineer will
coordinate their revision and addenda process in such a way as to insure that all required City approvals are
obtained, prior to work shown on the revisions being performed in the field.
Owner:
The project owner, or the architect or engineer acting as the owners agent, shall employ the special inspector or
agency.
ENFORCEMENT
A failure of the special inspector or firm to perform in keeping with the requirements of the IBC, the approved
plans and this document, may void this agreement and the Building Official's approval of the special inspector.
In such a case a new special inspector and/or firm would need to be proposed for approval. A failure of the
design and/or construction parties to perform in accordance with this agreement may result in a STOP WORK
notice being posted on the project until nonconforming items have been resolved.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
I have read and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement.
Owner: 1414 A/ 6Mi 2 Signature � �(�/�� Date 49& / U
Contractor: 110&14 %(r%¢IZSLE 4 Signature Date: lv Zl i1
Arc ng: X -Or rn I LOfKL Signature Date:
Special Insp. < 5*) (VW1VW,/.1161q,, Signatur z Date:
ACCEPTED FOR THE CITY OFF ED/MONDS BUILDING DEPT.
By: `LV Date:
LABuilding New Folder 2010\Forms\,Special inspection form doc10/25/2010
FIELD REPORT
NELSON
Project:
Williams Residence
File No.: 8323B11
GEOTECBMCAL
Client:
Ami Williams
Date: 7/22/11
ASSOCIATES, INC
Location:
17804 Vista Del Mar Drive,
Report No: 01
Edmonds, WA
17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500
Weather.
Mostly Sunny - 60's
Page: 1 of 2
Woodinville, WA 98072
Purpose of
(425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510
Visit:
Construction Monitoring
By: BD
We visited the site today at the request of Robin Kearsley of Kearsley Homes to observe and evaluate
construction activities at the Williams Residence project located at 17804 Vista Del Mar Drive in
Edmonds, Washington.
Upon arrival, we observed that most of the building foot print had been excavated, as shown on the
attached site plan. The contractor was excavating material from the southeastern portion of the property.
We also met with Robin. He informed us that the drilled pier locations had been staked, and that they
would be installed early next week.
Most of the soil exposed consisted of orange -brown to brown -gray, fine to medium sand with silt and
scattered layers of gravel, and an approximate wedge of silty sand with gravel that was up to
approximately three feet thick. We interpreted it to be native soil. We evaluated the exposed subgrade
with a 'A -inch diameter probe rod under moderate pressure, and found that the soil was penetrated
approximately % to 3 inches. We interpreted it to be dense.
We have been providing construction monitoring on a part-time basis: - Our findings and conclusions are
based on construction activities observed while on site. Based on our part-time observations in the field,
communications with the contractor, our understanding of this site and project plans, it is our opinion
that the foundation areas today should provide adequate support for the planned loads.
Attachment: Site Plan
Distribution:
Signed:
.:. .
• - _ •4:' � :•� �: �'•- :-� � 323 Q
.'.13•.1• .l L•. •. .-. •> �•-. �^+ a^•r.. ._-
or
'�: � • I �;..ii ~�.,-•:-°�-y. •� ^'�1' �f i• -r _+_�_ s,r '• 3 iv).. s-�-n�...>
- ` OJ A-s-^
s
i L31
Zj
�: � .. ,•-••.f' � ,. ••1 • `-..�,'��- - . � mss.. � .r r .� • . � ,' "- ^} • � ��
rye" a� � - � -. ' 3 .:; - ��� = . t - .; •- - i -.
r
FIELD REPORT
NELSON
Project:
Williams Residence
File No.: 8323B11
GEOTECHNICAL
Client:
Ann Williams
Date: 7/27/11
ASSOCUTES, INC
Location:
17804 Vista Del Mar.Drive,
Report No: 02
6
22.0
Edmonds, WA
23.0
I7311 135w Ave. NE #A-500
Weather:
Mostly sunny - 60's
Page: 1 of 3
WoodiavIllc, WA 98072
Purpose of
(425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510
Visit:
Construction Monitoring
By: BD/JRW
_ We visited the site today at the request of Robin Kearsley .of Kearsley Homes to observe and evaluate
{' construction activities at the Williams Residence project located at 17804 Vista Del Mar Drive in
Edmonds, Washington.
Drilled Piers
Upon arrival, we observed that the drilling contractor from Pearson Drilling had begun augering the first
hole for the drilled piers. Plans included the drilling of 14' drilled piers on the downhill side of the
residence. The soil exposed in the augered holes generally consisted of moist, brown -gray, fine to
medium sand with gravel grading with increasing gravel at about 16.0 feet below the existing ground
surface, and the holes were drilled between 20 to 23.5 feet, as shown in the chart below. The contractor
informed us that they were using an 18 -inch auger instead of the planned 16 -inch. After each hole was
augered, we used a flashlight to check if there was caving or groundwater in the drilled holes. We did
not observe caving or ground water in the holes, but we did observe moist to wet soil at the bottom of a
few of the holes. The rebar cages were then set into the hole.
Pile #12 was positioned too close to Pile #11 and it was decided by Robin to move it south
ed
approximately 12 inches. He said that this was suitable because of the planned location of the plana
grade beam that will be positioned above this pier.
Pile #
D th (ft) -
1
21.5
2
22.0
3
22.5
4
22.0
5
22.0
6
22.0
7
23.0
Pile #
Depth ft
8
22.5
9
23.5
10
22.0
11
22.0
12
22.0
13
22.0
14
23.0
Attachment: Site Plan Signed:
Distribution:
FIELD REPORT
NELSON
Project:
Williams Residence
File No.: 8323B11
GEOTECENICAL
Client:
Ann Williams
Date: 7127/11
ASSOCIATES, INC
Location:
17804 Vista Del Mar Drive,
Report No: 02
Edmonds, WA'
17311 135' Ave. NE #A-500
Weather:
Mostly Sunny - 60's
Page. 2 of 3
Woodinville, WA 98072
Purpose of
(425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510
Visit:
Construction Monitoring
By. BD/3RW
We observed the workers fill the drilled and caged holes with concrete using a pump trick and filling
from the top down. Each hole was filled to a level to create an equal top elevation for all 14 piers.
Approximately 1.3 cubic yards of concrete was used in each pia.
Foundation Sabg rade
We evaluated the foundation subgrade for the southwest portion of the site using a %-inch steel probe
rod. The soil was penetrated approximately one to two inches under moderate pressure, which we
interpreted as medium dense to dense. However, a small section in the western portion probed
approximately 6 inches, which we interpreted as loose, as shown on the site plan. We recommended
that this area be over -excavated before the foundation concrete was placed. Robin agreed.
Conclusion
We have been providing construction monitoring on a part -tune basis. Our findings and conclusions are
based on constriction activities observed while on site: Based on our part-time observations in the field,
communications with the contractor, our understanding of this site and project plans, it is our opinion
that the drilled piers were adequately installed, and the foundation areas evaluated today should provide
adequate support for the planned loads.
Attachment: Site Plan
Distribution:
WAt .i
,t.
FIELD REPORT
NELSON
Project:
Williams Residence
File No.: 8323B 11
GEOTECHNICAL
Client:
Ann Williams
Date: 9/15/11
ASSOCIATES, INC
Location:
17804 Vista Del Mar Drive,
Report No: 03
Edmonds, WA
17311 135TB Ave. NE #A-500
Weather:
Partly Sunny - 60's
Page: 1 of 2
Woodinville, WA 98072 Purpose of
(425) 486-1669 FAX 481-2510 Visit: Construction Monitoring By: BD
We visited the site today at the request of Robin Kearsley of Kearsley Homes to observe and evaluate
construction activities at the Williams Residence project located at 17804 Vista Del Mar Drive in
Edmonds, Washington.
Upon arrival, we met with Ron and Karl. They informed us that they were installing the footing drain
around foundation.' The footing drain consisted of 4 -inch perforated PVC pipe surrounded by washed
rock and covered with filter fabric. We also observed drainage composite along the back and sides of
the tall retaining walls. A portion of the footing drains had already been covered when portions of the
walls were backfilled for site access. We were informed that the drains were completed in the same
manner as what we observed. The contractors also told us that the roof downspouts would not be
connected to the footing drains, as recommended.
We have been providing construction monitoring on a part-time basis. Our findings and conclusions are
based on construction activities observed while on site. Based on our part-time observations in the field,
communications with the contractor, our understanding of this site and project plans, it is our opinion
that the footing drains are being installed in general accordance with project plans.
Attachment: Site Plan
Distribution:
OCT 2 12011
BUILDING DEPARTMEW
GTY OF EDMONDS
Signed: - C
NELSON GEOTECHNICAL
ASSOCIA'TES9NUA
I a
GEOTECHNICAL. ENGINEERS & GEC7LoGt,sTs
Man Office
17311 1350' Avenue NE, A-506
W000Srviil% WA. 08072 ..
(425)486-1669 FAX 1,425) 481.2510
(425) 337-1669 Snohori?sh County
February 8, 2)OT3
Ms. Ann Williams
21800 Ngotka Road
Woodway, Washington 08020
Coiastiur,tion':vloniitorittg Suimnary Letter
W ill iai rns Residence
-Edmonds; Washington
NGA File No. 8323BI I
De4ir.Nis. Williams:
Enginee(ing-Gedogq 8fanch
437 East.?enny Road
Wera-chee, VMA 50801
(509)'665-7696 FAX' 60q) 665-7692
We were tcquest'. d by your eonfi-actor Robin Kearsley of Kearslcy.Homes to prepare this summary letter
for.your residence project located at M01 Vista Del Mar Drive in Edmonds, Washingtom
Iaitroduction
We were retained to provide pati-iitne monitoring
.and consultation services during the cardiwork phase of
eoiistrttction. per the Special Inspections and 'r estiiib Agmement ieiluired by the City cif E(hnonds (Permit
:Nlo. 2011-0243). Our eeilliwork monitoring activities at the projzeG took place on apart -.bine basis from
July 22; .2011 through September :15:, 2010 and included observing f6undation. subgrade soil: bearing.
uei•ificat.ioii, pier instaliatio.n, footing drain installati. ln, and erosion contfol. measures. QLf. ohscrvatlons
and conclusions were documented in Field- Reports 1 ilirough 3, and in mciporandum titled.."Williams.
Residence — .Drainage linprovenients Recommendations •-• Edmonds, Washington;" dated. October I,
2012; all of which havebeen. submitted to you: We prey idusly piepamd:a geotwbnicai engiiieer)nl iepciit..
for alae propetly°titled "Geotechnical Engineering Evaluaiion — Williarns Residence —loot_ S. Vista.Del .Mar
-•• Edmonds; Washiington," dated Febniary 11, 2011.. 'We also prepared a plan reAew.letter for the project
datedJune 17, 2011,
4
C;onshtedor, Moaiton:og Suininmy Letier N46A File No. 93`23.B 11.
wiliiams. Residence February 8, 2013.
FAnionds, Washington page Z
Site Observations
We: njonitored drilled pier installation activities. on 7uly 27, 2()11 as dceumented in Field Report #2: We
observed :the drilling of 14, 1.8 -incl. diameter Doles advaiieed to depths of 20 to 23.5 feet below the ground
surface along the western, downhill side or the residence. The holes were drilled with a lirge drilling
auger and. ihr soil rxposed ui the cuttings mostly consisted of briawn-gnty, hlte to medium sand: We did
not. observe evidence .of caving or groundwater in lire holes, but we did observe moist to wet soil at the
bow.o n of a. few cif the holes. Afterrebar: cages were lowered. inio the drilled. holes, the holes were
backfilled with siruetural concrete to the same elevation in each hole,.
For 411 other areas of tbe.foatzdation, we evaluated the subgiade using a. Yriuch diameter probe rod under
axodcrate..presstire:. The exposed foundation. soils consisted of native, browt>'gray, fine to medium swid to
sand with silt, whichwe-interpreted as riati've. We found that the :native subgrade could be penetrated
approximately one to two inches. 'The subgrade was interpreted as medlurn.derlse to deh.Sc, suitable for
support of the planned foundation loads.
We. also observed the installation of the footing drains and drainage composite. rhe drains consisted of4-
inch performed pipe which ,;vas sturotitided v i.th crushed rock and covered with l'tltcr fabric. 'T.'Ire drains
appeared to :be installed .correctly and. were .located at or near the bottow of the footing, Drainage.
coIihad iJ:een installed along the taller }x�rtipns of the retaining: walls. The contractor unformed as
that theroof downspouts would :not be connecter tothe fooling drains, as we mcommeiided in our
geoteelmical report.
We visited the site ors January: 17, 21013 to. obsen?c the fi.nial.landscaping preparation. We Observed. that a
patio area was being created behind :he residence in the soutIhern. portion. of the backyard, acrd the .patio
subgr-ade appeared to be sloping Hway-t •onr the slope. Belo.w:the patio area, the ground slopes down for
about -three. ot-four fee: to a.small drainage ditch. that was. backfilled wil..h bentopiw to direct water to a
sirbsorface drain tWt is cotrrtected to .the storntwaier system. Along the top of slope,: a short berm (vas
cheated to grade the property back away from, the slope and to help pf.eVent water. #iota Fowhig ohio the
steep slope. The northern portion. of the backyard was graded relatively flat olid will, bE partially
veeetated. On the northeiir.side of the liouse; a 4 -inch perforated PVC drain was installed in a trench drat
was lined with filter fabric and baekfilled With washed rick._ Any'water.collected ..in this pipe will. be
directed.to the storm system. During our inost xecent site visit on.:fanuary 28., 201:3, we observed that.the
!NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
0
Constructiott.',�ioaitoring Sutnm.ary Letter NGA File No. 8323131.1
Wil hams. Residence. Fcbntary8, 2013
Unionds, Washington Page u
Landscaping xvw almost completed. We observed vegetation planted througLot. the backyard and side
yard. It was our opinion that the erosion control methods incorporated into: the landscape design are
itdequate attd should help prevent surface water from reaching the steep slope.
Cor>cltiasioti
Bused on our fgirt--time obsenzations, ,it'is cxtr opi.ttion thtit: the earthwork activities at this site,. including
residential I-bundation subgrade; pier installation, subsurface drainage, and .er6siol3 control niethods were
completed ih.general accordance with our recornibendations,, contract plats, mid. specificatioi:s. The new
landscaped areas and the steep slope should be closely monitored ior:any signs of distress, Tf ally distress
is observed, we shoiuld.tie c6ht6ctcd-ininiediately to evaluait the conditions and provide recommendatiolis
for slope -repairs. Also, long -teen, ntaintemnce of the ins and landscaped areas is ibportant to prevent
water femb flowing over. the slope and 'creating instability concerns: All other reconrrnendations and
pr uti6m; presented in our report and .memb regarding, mainta niing, slope stability shoal() be strictly
fcillowed. We re o nmetid that our report and metro along with this letter be -passed on to futuine tiolne
0xvttets if the house is.sold.
0-0-0
NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
.C.Onstyuctioti.Monitoring Summary Letter
Williams K4eside.me
Edmolids, WaMii4o'n
N'dA File No. 8323B 11
Febraaq 8, 2013
Page 4
We. appreciate the opportunity to be of service- to you on this. project. We consider•our services .for: this
project to be CoaiPk.tp,'bn1es.s You q,iccificAl
Ity ontacf-us.tar additi6nal work. If you have any. questions.
rc.or require: ftwther infonnatio
regarding this leiter or req on, please UJI..
Sincerely, ,
:NELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOCIATES; :INC.
V
�D6 Dodoye-A]Ali
Project Geologist
KhAl.ed.M. Sha%rish,-RE
Principal
Two Copies Submitted
131)--KMS-bd
NELSON GEOTECHN[CAL ASSOCIATES; )NC.
August 09, 20:1.1
Robin Kearsley
Kearsley Homes, Tnc.
121any. Street
Moo, WA 99898
N
SUBJECT- House Sinking.
nis'letter'is to infdrin you that David Rvam and.Associ6les, lnc:(DM). silrveYots were % 6h --site 7/2-1/2011 and
C0171pleued the staking of the 1.5 house corkers and the 14 individual.piling locations. per our ag7eement:1111i]
hotist plans provided by Stott Miller Architects, dated SJUI/20-1.1.
Pleasecontactme if you Wye any qucstions or concerliA.
Sincerely,
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Robert.GAlermaqn-, P.I.S.
Senior Associate
Initials: rch
I Baum sbicing, cpnfirmation Letter.docx,
Pr<&c0slumber: KPAROW15-0001
. . . ... . .. ...... .. ....... . ............. ............. ........ .......
425.5932*W
Mi,.rhu, VII. -w 'DrIvk� Mf' ElAn-0
U
Am
DAVID EVAN a
ANc)ASSOCIATES INC.
September .1., 20.11
Robin Kearsley
Kearsley Homes, Inc.
6631 Norma Beach Road
Edmonds, WA 98026 .
SUBJECT: House Staking— Lot 8, Vista Del Mar
.1.7804 Vista Del Mar Drive, Edmonds, WA 93026
Dear Robin:
This letter is to inform you and Confirm that David Evans and Associates, Inc (DEA) surveyors were on-site
at the above referenced property on 7/2:1./201.1 and completed the staking of 16 exterior foundation corners
and the centers of the 14 individual pilings, per our agreement and house plans provided by Scott Miller
Architects, dated 5/0-1/2011.
Our field crew set hub and tacks at 16 exterior corners of the foundation walls and at the centers of each of the
14 pilings. See the attached sketch for locations of piling and foundation points staked.
Please contact ule if you have any questions ur Concerns.
Sincerely,
DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Robert C. Hermann, P.L.S.
Senior Associate
Initials: rch
Pile Nance:P:U<SKI:AIZn00(10002\0300(:Oi\•I\R-Oe-I I House StAiug C'onl'irmation L.etter_2.docx
Project Number: KEAR0000-0002
10_0 \-V( I Mil lilt, Vww [)IIVI' j ill. 200 FV1,14,11 t:V,tslnut;lint'ttS'UI Teloplimlo .1;-;.r ,10';1) J:. it •.nnih. .I_-
V.
cc
C.4
7
z
ra
uj
cc
t
cc
LU
,m
z
m
0
L�L
=1,
V.
cc
C.4
7
ra
ell
t
,m
=1,
1
ra
ell
l6t—
ra
ell