The URL can be used to link to this page

BLD20110566.pdf4'' ofED IVU� CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH AVENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 nc. 189 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 Expiration Date: 11/2/2012 Parcel No: 27033600106100 - PFpjectAddress: _23414 EDMONDS WAY, EDM1 GRE EDMONDS WAY LLC - 29 UNITS STUDIO MENG STRAZZA VENTURE GENERAL CONTRCTNG LLC 2801 ALASKAN WAY SUITE 310 CHRIS DAVIDSON 2801 Alaskan Way SEATTLE, WA 98121 2001 WESTERN AVE, SUTIE 200 SUITE 310 SEATTLE, WA 98121 Seattle, WA 98121 (425)889-4381 (206)587-3797 (206)834-6402 LICENSE #: VENTUGC899LZ EXP:6/9/2013 DESCRIPTIONJOB CONSTRUCT (1) 3 -LEVEL MULIT-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING WITH 29 DWELLING UNITS AND OPEN PARKING BELOW. --"'LETED VALUATION: $2,824,695.30 COM PERMIT TYPE: Commercial PERMIT GROUP: 06 - Apartment/Condo New GRADING: N CYDS: 6000 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: VB RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: N OCCUPANT GROUP: R-2, S-2 OCCUPANT LOAD: 183 FENCE: N ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: 09 OTHER: N ----- OTHER DESC: ZONE: RM -EW NUMBER OF STORIES: 3 VESTED DATE: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 29 LOT #: BASEMENT: 0 1 ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 BASEMENT: 11000 1 ST FLOOR: 12288 2ND FLOOR: 12288 3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0. 13RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 620 OTHER: 0 FRONTi REQUIRED: E 15 PROPOSED: 15 1 REQUIRED: N 10 PROPOSED: > 10 RE UIRED: W 15 PROPOSED: >15 HEIGHT ALLOWED:35 PROPOSED:34.9 I REQUIRED: S 10 PROPOSED: 14 SETBACK NOTES: Height bonuses (25'+5'+5'=35' Max Height) 1 AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF THE LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27, THIS APPLIQ9TION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HIS/HER DEPUTY-4ND ALL FEES ARE PAID. l /- Z —I / a L—m"ailm Signature Print Name Date Release Date �— ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/ IBC110/ IRCI 10. ONLINE PPLICANT ASSESSOR OTHER STATUS: ISSUED BLD20110566 • Separate Permit Required For: Electrical, plumbing, mechanical, fire alarm and sprinler • Special inspections have been called for on this project and are noted on the approved construction plans and building permit. It is the owner and/or contractors responsibility to assure that reports are provided to the City on a weekly basis. Be advised -- if special inspection reports are not forthcoming, the Building Official may issue a "Stop Work" and no City inspections will be provided until such time as the reporting agency has complied and reports are reviewed and approved by the City. • Hose Bibbs (exterior faucets) are required to have a permanently affixed anti -siphon device installed. • In addition to the required pressure/relief valve, an approved listed expansion tank shall be installed on all hot water tanks. Per UPC 608. • Obtain Electrical Permit from State Department of Labor & Industries. 425-290-1309 • Gas pipe test must be observed by City Building Inspector, affidavits shall not be accepted. • Submit all special inspection reports to the City Building Inspector on a weekly basis. • Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of the building or structure. Check the job card for all required City inspections including final project approval and final occupancy inspections. • Provide combustion air per IMC -Chapter 7 for commercial and multi -family residential installations, and IRC Chapter 17 for one and two-family dwellings. • Any request for alternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes, ordinances or policies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. • Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. • Pursuant to UPC 608 a pressure regulator valve (PRV) shall be installed near the water shutoff. • Sound/Noise originating from temporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activities must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. • Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance for this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any City ordinance nor limit in any way the City """"s ability to enforce any ordinance provision. • New and existing buildings shall have approved address numbers, building nurgbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly visible from the street or road fronting the property. Address numbers shall be Arabic numerals or alphabet letters. Numbers shall be legible from the public way, at least 4 inches high with a''/2 inch min. stroke width on a contrasting background. INSPECTIONS THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. p PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 I ENGINEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 1 FIRE (425) 775-7720 PUBLIC WORKS 425 771-0235 1 PRE-TREATMENT 425 672-5755 1 RECYCLING 425) 275-4801 When calling for an inspection please leave the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being requested, Contact Name and Phone Number, Date Prefereed, and whether you prefer morning or afternoon. • E -Engineering Final • B -Setbacks • B -Slab Insulation • B-Exterior Wall Sheathing • B-Roof Sheathing B-Exterior Gypsum Sheathing B-Shear Nailing • B-Height Verification • B-Fire Stopping • B-Framing • B-Wall Insulation/Caulk • B-Insulation/Energy • B-Sheetrock Nail • B-Building Final • F-Fire Hydrant Verification F-Fire Connection Installation • F-Fire Connection Pressure Test • F-Fire Final P-Planning Final Iw LU � W w � H LL OZ Q � } Z Z W Z w CL d0 � LL O w 2 H N 25 z,Q y AF Fj 9 U c 3 0 0 d rn d` E U) U) N m J = Z U W Q m 7 U) Ul J U OrQ O 4)O O E.Eaw W MZ0O LUQW0 • C7N Z N_a L: wt"w 3 E~~ MV Ov ZLu� m H W OLL M _j �O O O N N � O N O//�w�/� N d C m W R �. w V CL Co O O O NU- m o E r N CL O E U 7 to ` M B LEI .. t i M CL �O C Ink V C6 M 01-1-1 Iw LU � W w � H LL OZ Q � } Z Z W Z w CL d0 � LL O w 2 H N 25 z,Q y AF Fj 9 U c 3 0 0 d rn d` E U) U) N m J = Z U W Q m 7 U) Ul J U OrQ O 4)O O E.Eaw W MZ0O LUQW0 • C7N Z N_a L: wt"w 3 E~~ MV Ov ZLu� m H W OLL M _j r R �. w V CL Co Iw LU � W w � H LL OZ Q � } Z Z W Z w CL d0 � LL O w 2 H N 25 z,Q y AF Fj 9 U c 3 0 0 d rn d` E U) U) N m J = Z U W Q m 7 U) Ul J U OrQ O 4)O O E.Eaw W MZ0O LUQW0 • C7N Z N_a L: wt"w 3 E~~ MV Ov ZLu� m H W OLL M of E°Moti Inspection Comments BLD20110566 06 - Apartment/Condo New Applied: 07/21/2011 Issued: 11/02/2011 Expires: 11/02/2012 �qc. 1 R90 Address: 23014 EDMONDS WAY, EDMONDS .INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1077 - E -Engineering Final 08/19/2011 MCCONNELL COM Comment: Gutters & downspouts connected to appropriate storm drainage systems? 1077 - E -Engineering Final 04/18/2012 MCCONNELL COM Comment: Sibrel also on site. Need one way signage and striping. Parking stall striping needs to be complete. Trash enclosure does not have gate, but okay to final per S.Fisher. S.Dunphy of OVWSD also gives approval to final. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 04/20/2012 MCCONNELL COM Comment: Parking striping completed. Directional signage being installed today. Fire Lane signage on order. Need to discuss Fire lane striping with FD. Striping scheduled for next Tuesday. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 04/30/2012 MCCONNELL COM Comment: Also need to sign off on bld20110468 - foundation permit for this building. 1077 - E -Engineering Final 05/04/2012 MCCONNELL CMP Comment: Approved. 1106 - B -Setbacks 04/18/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: Per Hansen Surveying March 7,2012 letter 1118 - B -Slab Insulation 02/09/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: , 1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In 02/03/2012 LAWLER COM Comment: first nine units 1130 - B -Mechanical Rough In 02/09/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1132 - B -Exterior Wall Sheathing 01/27/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1133 - B -Roof Sheathing 12/06/2011 LAWLER COR Comment: Between 50 to 80 percent of fasteners are overdriven. Add one flush fastener for each two over penetrated. Special inspector to confirm. 1133 - B -Roof Sheathing 02/07/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1134 - B -Exterior Gypsum Sheathing Comment: 1136 - B -Shear Nailing Comment: 12/13/2011 LAWLER CMP 01/27/2012 LAWLER CMP 1140 - B -Height Verification 04/18/2012 LAWLER Comment: Per Hansen Surveying March 7,2012 letter 5/4/2012 12:15:41 PM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 CMP Page 1 of 3 INSPECTION DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1141 - B -Fire Stopping �i 02/10/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1142 - B -Framing 12/22/2011 LAWLER PAR Comment: Okay to pre rock behind tub/showers at party walls 1142 - B -Framing 01/11/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: First 1/3 of building okay to insulate. 1142 - B -Framing 01/17/2012 LAWLER COM Comment: RC channel okay first 9 units 1142 - B -Framing 01/19/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: as listed in city binder on jobsite 1142 - B -Framing 01/23/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: All units okay, storage and garage remain 1142 - B -Framing 02/09/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 01/13/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: first nine units 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 01/25/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: 205,206.305,306 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 01/27/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: See job site notes 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 01/31/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: Ins and rc channel complete except storage and parking areas 1144 - B -Wall Insulation/Caulk 02/09/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1146 - B-Insulation/Energy 01/25/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: First nine plus 205,206.207&208 1146 - B-Insulation/Energy 02/08/2012 LAWLER COM Comment: Floor insulation at parking 1146 - B-Insulation/Energy 02/09/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 02/03/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: first nine units 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 02/07/2012 LAWLER COM Comment: Units 211,212,311,312,&105 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 02/08/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: RC channel at parking 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 02/09/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: All units 5/4/2012 12:15:41 PM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 2 of 3 INSPECTION Y DATE INSPECTOR ACTION 1150 - B-Sheetrock Nail 04/18/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1158 - B -Building Final 04/10/2012 LAWLER PAR Comment: one unit walk through 1158 - B -Building Final 04/18/2012 LAWLER COM Comment: 1.) Provide Fire, engineering, and planning final approvals - 2.) Thresholds at type A units to be 3/4" maximum with 1 to 2 slope 3.) Provide a shelf and pole within 48" reach range at type A closets 3.) Provide survey for carport setbacks 1158 - B -Building Final 04/26/2012 LAWLER CMP Comment: 1900 - F -Fire Hydrant Verification 04/19/2012 -SMITHM CMP Comment: APPROVED 1905 - F -Fire Connection Installation 04/19/2012 SMITHM CMP Comment: APPROVED 1910 - F -Fire Connection Pressure Test 04/19/2012 SMITHM CMP Comment: APPROVED 1985 - F -Fire Final 04/19/2012 SMITHM PAR Comment: ALL APPROVED?AWAITING PHONE LINES FOR FA MONITORING 1985 - F -Fire Final 04/30/2012 SMITHM CMP Comment: APPROVED 2000 - P -Planning Final 11/03/2011 COCCIA COM Comment: Note: Hello Gina, the contractor would like to change the hedge along the west side of the parking lot from Portugal laurel to a taller hedge of Emerald green Pyramidalis for additional screening. Seeing that it is located on the perimeter I wanted to make sure this is acceptable and that it does not have any permitting issues. Thanks for the help, Sean Lundquist Brumbaugh & Associates 2000 - P -Planning Final 04/18/2012 COCCIA CMP Comment: Ok 04/17/2012. 5/4/2012.12:15:41 PM 121 5th Ave, Edmonds Washington - Phone: (425) 771-0220 Page 3 of 3 SPECIAL iNSPECTION AND TESTING- AGREEMENT Permit #'H—d.P roi eet: prior to issrtance of a permit, .this form »rust be completed iii its enfireo, and returned to the City far• approval, The cornpletera' form nutst have .signatures of acknawledgment by: all parties. DUTIES AND RE'E'SPONS) BH:ITIES Spe6al•InspectionVirm and Special Inspectots: W.111.The Special Inspection firra.Of rm is special s inspection for the following types of work (separate forrns•must be submitted if snore: than one firm to be employed}: , ❑ Reinforced'Concrete ❑ Spray- applied Fireproofing El Bolting .in Concrete ❑ smoke Control Systems ❑ Prestressed Coni' to ❑`later -al Wood . ❑ Shotcrete &radIng/sofig ❑1StructutalObservatian ❑ Structurallvlasnnry 5Y .0 •StructuralSe[teel/ .dirtg ❑.Other Ll High:SiiengthB:olting ❑ Other. Aj,i diAdual insp rs to bo.emipToyed an tip rrpject will be `VABO certified -for the type of workthey are to inspect: If insp�ctaon is;for.x orlcthdis.not•cay.a.xed by tYze-WABO categories, -or the inspector is not W��BO wr ied,,a.detZ,ed-resume of*e inspector and £ori must be submitted. The xesume must show that the 'inspector and te.� arexD lified by education Emd experience to perform the work and testing required by�tlze project design. and.specifications. 'The w.orkshallbe inspected for conformance with the plans -and specifications approved by the. City. Revisions and addenda sheets will not be used for inspection, unless theyhave-been approved bythe City. inspection recordsm shall include: • A daily fecbrd.to be maintained on site, itemizing the inspections performed. Anynaflconforrningwork shall be, brought to the immediate attention of :the contractor for resolution. :• A weekly report shall be submitted to the City; detailingthe inspections and testing performed, listing airy nonconforming work -and resolution of nonconforming items. • A final report shall be submitted to the brulding-departmentpriortothe Certificat .oi Oecugai�cy being issued. 'This report?hl indicate that inspection and testing was completed c ormance with the approved plans, specifications and approved revisions or addenda. Atzy u=esolved.disazepancies must be detailed.in the final report. ESUB. JUN 13 2011 LABuilding New -Folder= i 0Torms\SpecW inspectionSarm:docl0/25r10.10 WILDING OF w DT- Contractor: The contractor shall provide the special inspector or agency adequate notification of workrequinng inspection. The City approved plan and specifications must be made available, at the jobsite for -the use of the special inspector and the City inspector. The contractor shall maintain all daily inspection reports, on site, for review by all parties. The special inspection functions are considered to be in addition to the norislal inspections'performed by the City and the contractor is responsible for contacting the City to schedule regular inspections. No concrete shall be poured or other work covered until "approval is given by the .City inspector. Building Department: The building department shall review any revisions and addenda. The City inspector will monitor the special inspection functions for compliance with the agreement and the approved plans. The City inspector shall be responsible for approving various'stages of construction to be covered and for work to proceed. Design Prdfessi finals: The, architect and/or engineer will clearly indicate on the plans and specifications the specific types of special inspection required. and shall include a schedule for inspection and .testing. The architect and/or engineer will coordinate their revision and addenda process in such a viray as to insure that all required City approvals. are obtained, prior to work shown on the revisions being performed in the field. Owner: The pt,ect owner, or the architect or engineer acting as the owners agent, shall employ the special inspector or agency. ENFORCEMENT A four,of the special inspector or firm to perform in keeping with the requirements of the IBC.the approved plans and this document, may void this agreement and the Building Official's approval of the special inspector In such a case a new special inspector and/or f=- tivould need to be proposed for approval. A failure of the design and/or construction parties to perform.ia accordance with this agreement may result in a STOP WORIX notice being posted on the projectuntil-nonconforming items have been resolved. ACIKNOY&EDGMNTS I have read and a ee to.comply with Me tem ana conazuonN vl U14a Owner: "SCC �cti �-'[ LJ Signature Date `i Contractor; i/c_.,r�r�-�-��-<�'x�BTe / Date: G -/ 3 �'/ te-oP�ignatuze Date: Csz 7 Special Insp, Signature Date: ACCEPTED FOR THE crreb>i EWONDS BUILDING DEPT. By: Date: A 1-64, L: BuildingNew Polder 20101Forms\Speciai inspection form.docl0/2512010 June 9, 2011 E$-2039.01 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310' Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Mr. Matt Parent Subject: Plan Review and Response To Comments Proposed Apartment Complex 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington ' Reference: City of Edmonds Plan Review Comments Soldier Pile Shoring 23014 Edmonds Way Project# BLD20110410 & BLD20110411 Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences 'Studio Meng Strazzara Building Permit Submittal Plan Sheets Dated June 1, 2011 (Shoring Drawings Sheets SH1 and SH2, dated June 8, 2011) ..Earth Solutions NW, LLC Geotechnical Engineering Study ES -2039, dated April 6, 2011 Dear Mr. Parent`. In accordance with your. request, Earth Solutions. NW, LLC (ESNW) has reviewed the above referenced plan sheets and review comments prepared by the City of Edmonds. The pertinent geotechnical review comments are provided below, followed by our. response. City of Edmonds Comment. -1 Provide a letter. from the geotechnical engineer of record showing that he has reviewed and approved the shoring plans for compliance with the geotechnical report. ESNW Response — ESNW .has reviewed the shoring plans included as part of the above referenced Building Permit Submittal package (Sheets SH1 and SH2). Based on our review, the geotechnical recommendations have been appropriately incorporated into the design. 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 1 Bellevue, WA 98005 1 (425) 449-4704 • FAX (425) 449-4711 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC PES -2039.01 June 9, 2011 Page 2 City of Edmonds Comment 2 — Provide a photo monitoring program document signed by the geotechnical engineer, owner, and contractor per page 9 of the geo report. ESNW Response - A photo monitoring program document (with requested signatures) has been prepared, and is included as an attachment to this letter. As described in the attached monitoring program document, a photo survey of existing conditions around the site will be completed prior to the beginning of construction. Survey. monitoring points will also be established around the site perimeter (adjacent to proposed shored excavations), and will be surveyed weekly during the mass excavation activities. ' Please see the attached photo monitoring program document for additional details regarding the monitoring program. City of Edmonds Comment 4b — Justify the use of non -pressure preservative treated lagging at "temporary locations". It would seem to .be an invitation for the lagging to rot out, and the geotech report indicated a well compacted backfill without deleterious materials intermixed. ESNW Response - The use of untreated lagging at the locations specified on the shoring plans is acceptable from a geotechnical standpoint. The soldier pile and- lagging system is temporary where untreated lagging is specified. Concrete foundation walls will provide permanent support of the excavation (independent of the temporary shoring structure) and any long term degradation of the timber lagging would be insignificant with respect to the foundation wall performance. The immediate site perimeter along the alignment of the temporaryshoring Wall where untreated lagging %. prbposed will Largely consist of onsite landscaping areas (with the exception of the entrance. drive off 232"d Street Southwest). In our experience, .the settlement potential at the ground. surface associated with long term degradation of the temporary timber lagging is insignificant, and settlement at the ground surface is not expected. We trust this letter and geotechnical response to the City of Edmonds Plan Review Comments meets your current needs. Should you require additional information, or have questions, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Raymond A. Coglas', P. Principal Attachment: Photo And Survey Monitoring Program Document (signed) Earth Solutions NW, LLC. PHOTO AND SURVEY MONITORING PROGRAM DOCUMENT* . (Signature Page) OWNER Signature Print Name Company . Company Print Name] Company Date Phone Number Date �yZs 7e G Phone Number GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 6 Itt Date Phone Number PHOTO AND SURVEY MONITORING PROGRAM DOCUMENT Proposed Apartment Complex 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington ES -2039.01 The following process with respect to photo and survey monitoring shall be implemented prior to the beginning of construction: Photo Survey Prior to -the.. beginning of construction, photographs of immediately adjacent right-of-ways, building structures, and other related features shall be acquired for the purpose of documenting existing conditions. In addition, special attention and "close-up" photo documentation of the following shall be acquired: Existing cracks in pavements, sidewalks, and curbs. . Areas of obvious existing settlement or distress of structures (or ground surfaces) around the immediate site perimeter. Survey Monitorinn Prior to thebeginning of construction, survey monitoring points shall be established along the site perimeter where right-of-ways are adjacent to proposed shored excavations. This condition will occur at the south end of the site along 232"d Street SVV. A•minimum of three survey monitoring points (equally spaced) shall be established eight to ten feet back from the proposed shoring wall alignment. A baseline reading shall be acquired prior to the beginning of construction. During the shoring and excavation activities, readings shall be acquired weekly. Following installation of the soldier piles, but prior to excavation activities, survey monitoring points shall be established at the top of every third soldier pile to monitor pile deflections. A baseline reading shall be acquired prior to excavation .activities: During the lagging and excavation activities, readings shall be acquired weekly (unless otherwise specified by the geotechnical engineer). The geotechnical engines' shall review the survey monitoring data as .it becomes available. Following the completion of.�excavation activities, the frequency of readings may be reduced if the data indicate no significant shoring wall movements. The geotechnical engineer, surveyor, and contractor shall discuss the results.of the monitoring data following excavation. Typically, the frequency of readings is reduced to every two weeks and then to every month, assuming the data indicate no significant movements. �O SPE:CIAL.INSPECTION ANDTESTING S' ING AGREEMEN Perrin #: 11-41 Pl Froj eet: Prior to issuance of a permit; t1lis form must he completed in :its entirety an -d returned -to the- City for . approival. Tliv contpleted jorrzt must have signatures of acknotvl091-Tient liy atl patties. , DTJ-T]Mi S AND RESPONSIBUITIES Special Inspection Firm alxdSpecialln.spectors: The Special Inspection firm of will perform special must be submitted if more than_one firm is inspection for the :.Nlowing`types of work (geparate.fonm's°s to be employed):' , .,4 Reinforced -Concrete ❑ -Spray applied.Fireproofing ❑ Bolting in Concrete 0 Smoke: Control Systems ❑ :Prestressed Concrete C] Lateral Wood 0 Shotcrete V Structural Observation ❑ Structural. Masonry ❑'.Gradinglsoils .. Structur l.Steel/Vilelding jaQdl +� Other s r: ' » i � ►+ + ❑ High Strength Bolting ❑ Other. 111 ingividuel:uaspectois to be employed orAbis proje'd wi11 be WABO cert4cd for the type:of worIc they are to inspect, inspect, , forworlc t is riot eoveredby the WAB.C1 categories, or the inspector isnot WABO tiiicrl, a � resresumeoft1� a i neector mud firm maust be- submitted.. The resume must show that the ce> inspectaa aud;the:firm are q,14f-,dby, educatton artd experience to perform the work and:tesfing required by the project design and specifications. Thetvorlcshall be•inspectedfor conformance with the plans and speciflcati0ns.appr0ved by the City. -Revisions and addenda sheets -wilLnot-be used for inspection, unless they have been approved by the .City. Inspection records shall include: • A -daily record -to• b -e maintained-.om,sitei item='. 9 the inspections performed. Any nonconforming work shall be brought4o the immediate.attention of the: contractor -£or resolution. • A weekiy report. shall be submitted to the City; detailing the inspections and testing performed, listing any nonconforming -work and resolution of nonconforming items. • A final.report shall h :submitted to the building department prior to the Certificate:of Occupancy being. issued. This report Will'indicate that inspection and testing was completed in conformance with the approved -plans, specifications and approvedsevisions or addenda. Any unresolved discrepancies must be detailed in the final report. IT 8a B JUN 13 2011 L:1Building blew Folder 2010TormslSpepialinspec6on rorm.docl0l25/.2010 BUILDING DEPAFITMENT CITY OF reDMONDs . CIS COP Contractor: The contractor shall provide the special inspector or agency adequate notification of work requiring inspection. The City approved plan and specifications must be made available, at the jobsite for the use of the special inspector and the City inspector. The contractor shall maintain.all daily inspection reports, on site, for review by all parties. 'The special inspection functions are considered to be in addition to the normal inspections performed by the- City and the contractor is responsible for contacting the City to schedule regular inspections. No concrete shall be poured ornther work covered until approval is given by the City inspector. Build ne Department: The building department shall review any revisions and addenda. The City inspector will. monitor the special inspection functions for compliance with the agreement and the approved. plans. The City inspector shall be responsible for approving various stages of construction to be covered and for work to proceed. Design Professionals: The.architect and/or.engineerVill clearly indicate on the plans and specifications the specific types of special inspection required. and shall include a schedule for inspection and testing. The architect and/or engineer will coordinate their revision and addenda process in such a way as to insure that all required City approvals are obtained, prior to work shown on the revisions being performed in the field. Owner:' as the owners agent, shall The project owner, or the architect or engineer acting the special inspector or agency.' ENFORCEIVIENT + A.f Kure of the special inspector or firm to perform in keeping with the requirements of the iBC, the approved plans and this -document, may void this agreement and the Building Official's approval of the special inspector• In such'a case a new special inspector and/or firm Wouldneed to be proposed for approval. A failure of the designand/or construction parties to perform in accordance with this agreement may result is a STM WORK notice beingposted on the-projed until nonconforming items have been resolved. , ACIKNOyyY,E GNMNTS , I have read and agree to comply with the te=rns and conditions of this agreement. �'iC' � rc-= C' � u��loQ Date. •iv .�` i- � Owner: Y u -c- Signature Contractor t/��. — -� +�- -,r Signature Date: I ng Signature ESU1 t;6P. Date Speciallnsp. Signature Date: ACCEP'T'ED FOR THE CTT*F EDMONDS BUILDING DEPT. By.G(/ Date: LA13uildingNew Folder 2.010NForMASperial inspection fomLdcc1W2512010 June 9, 2011 ES -2039.01 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Mr. Matt Parent Subject: Plan Review and Response To Comments Proposed Apartment Complex 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington Reference: City of Edmonds Plan Review Comments Soldier Pile Shoring 23014 Edmonds Way. Project# BLD20110410 & BLD20110411. Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering . • Construction Monitoring • Environmental. Sciences Studio Meng Strazzara Building Permit Submittal Plan Sheets. Dated June 1., 2011 (Shoring Drawings Sheets SH1 and SH2, dated June 8,-2011) Earth Solutions NW, LLC Geotechnical Engineering Study ES -2039, dated April 6, 2011 Dear Mr. Parent. In accordance with your. request; Earth Solutions NW,'LLC (ESNW) has reviewed the .above referenced plan sheets and review comments prepared by the City of Edmonds. The pertinent geotechnical review comments are provided below, followed by our response. City of Edmonds Comment' 1 Provide a letter from the geotechnical engineer of record showing that he has reviewed and approved the shoring plans for compliance with the geotechnical report. ESNW Response — ESNW .has reviewed the shoring plans included as part of the above referenced Building Permit Submittal package (Sheets SH1 and SH2). Based on our review, the geotechnical recommendations'have.been appropriately incorporated into the design. 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 0 Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 0 FAX (425) 449-4711 GRE Edmonds Way, -LLC June 9, 2011 PES -2039.01 Page 2 City of Edmonds Comment 2 — Provide a photo monitoring program document signed by the geotechnical engineer, owner, and contractor per page 9 of the geo report. ESNW Response - A photo monitoring program document (with requested signatures) has been prepared, and is included as an attachment to this letter. As described in the attached monitoring program document, a photo survey. of existing conditions around the site will be completed prior to the beginning of construction. Survey. monitoring points will also be established around the site - perimeter (adjacent to proposed shored excavations), and will be surveyed weekly during the mass excavation activities. Please see the attached photo monitoring program document. for additional details regarding the monitoring program. City of Edmonds Comment 4b — Justify the use of non -pressure preservative treated lagging at "temporary locations". It would seem to .be an invitation for the lagging to rot out, and the geotech report indicated a well compacted backfill without deleterious materials intermixed. ESNW Response - The use of untreated lagging at the -locations specified on the shoring plans is acceptable from a geotechnical standpoint. The soldier pile and lagging system is temporary where untreated lagging is specified. Concrete foundation walls will provide permanent support of the excavation (independent of the temporary shoring structure) and any long term degradation of the timber lagging would be insignificant with respect to the foundation wall performance. The immediate site perimeter along the alignment of the Temporary shoring wall w'h'ere untreated lagging is proposled will Largely consist of onsite landscaping areas (with the exception of the. entrance drive off 232". Street Southwest). In our experience, .the settlement potential at the ground surface associated with long term degradation of the temporary timber lagging is insignificant, and settlement at the ground surface is not expected. We trust this letter and geotechnical response to the City of Edmonds Plan meets _ your current needs. Should you require additional information, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, LLC Raymond A.-Coglas, P. Principal t(I Attachment: Photo And Survey Monitoring Program Document (signed) Earth Solutions NW, LLC Review Comments )r have questions, PHOTO AND SURVEY MONITORING PROGRAM DOCUMENT (Signature Page) OWNER Signature Print Name e coo—, Company Company Date Phone Number Date �zs 74�G S Phone Number - - - •--•GINEER Company r 6 CT Et Da to Phone Number PHOTO AND SURVEY MONITORING PROGRAM DOCUMENT Proposed Apartment Complex 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington ES -2039.01 The following process with respect to photo and survey monitoring shall be implemented prior to the beginning of construction: Photo Survey Prior to the beginning of construction, photographs of, immediately adjacent right-of-ways, building structures, and other related features shall be acquired for the purpose of documenting existing conditions. In addition, special attention and "close-up" photo documentation of the following shall be acquired: + Existing cracks in pavements, sidewalks, and curbs. Areas of obvious existing settlement or distress of -structures (or ground surfaces) around the immediate site perimeter. Survey Monitoring Prior to the beginning of construction,_ survey monitoring points shall be established along the site perimeter where right-of4ays are adjacent to proposed shored excavations. This condition will occur at the south end of the site along 232nd Street SVV. A minimum of three survey monitoring points (equally spaced) shall be established eight to ten feet back from the proposed shoring wall alignment. A baseline reading shall be acquired prior to the beginning of construction. During the shoring and excavation activities, readings shall be acquired weekly. Following installation of the soldier piles, but prior to excavation activities, survey monitoring points shall ble established at the top of everythird soldier pile to monitor pile deflections. A, baseline reading shall be acquired prior to excavation activities:, During the lagging and excavation activities, readings shall be acquired weekly (unless otherwise specified by the geotechnical engineer). The geotechnical engin4sha11 review the survey monitoring data as .it becomes available. Following the completion of.'excavation activities, the frequency of readings may be reduced if the data indicate no significant shoring wall movements. The geotechnical engineer, surveyor, and contractor shall discuss the results of the monitoring data following excavation. Typically, the frequency of readings is reduced to every two weeks and then to every month, assuming the data indicate no significant movements. spEcM +.AJ.`(I�P9L�.J1IO AND 11L��79.g1'\'lTl)�7�1i11YYTri�1 Fernrlit o: /1- 011 FYoj ect: prior to Issuance of apermit; this farm ttusi be cotttpietedin its entirety avd returned- to the. City for rt.proval, Vt o completad for"tt 1ttusi heave signaluras oaf aclartoyvle trtettt by a17patKies. UUTM, S AND RXM0'NSl! 1UTMS tSRectal YnsoectionTian alldSneclal.insnectors: The special7nspection fuzn.of v,�ill perform Special inspection ibr the followi4xtypes dfwork (separate.farms must be submitted if more than -one firm ie to -be employed);. .9 Reioforced•Concrete ❑ B61ting In Concrete. 12 T,restressed concrete ❑ Shotcrete , ❑ StructuralMaswY tructural S`t t- ldiug P.aiy ❑ 1111 Strength Bolting ❑� Spray applied Fireproofing 13 Sm01ce Control Systems 'Cl Lateral Wood '❑ StruotaralObservanon ❑ lzading/soils ; ther Ir ❑ . Other AU—inii vidueJ.inspactQw.to be employed on this project•willbe WABO certified for the type!of wort they are to inspect -Tf-j speo6oa is_ for•worIFthat isnot eavetedby the VJAB(? oategories, or the inspector isswMABO speotorand firm znustbe•submitted, The resume must dhow that the certiftecly a detailed resume ofthe in hppector•and the firm arc quallfledbyeducation and.expericnee top�rform the vs'ork and:iesting required ]xy the pr6jectdesign and speeificstaons. The *aticshall be inspected, for conformannewith the plans and specifwgions.appnovgdby. City. Revisions and addenda sheets will.not•bo usedfor inspection, unless they have been approvedby the.Ctty. Inspection records shall include: • A •dally record -to• b e maintains dente; itemizing the inspections performed. Any nonconforl=8 work shall he bcouglit:to the immediate.attention of the contractor for resolutign. A weekly report shaII be submitted to the City; detailing the inspections and- testing performed, listing anyuonconforming•work and resolution oftonconforming items. o A finalseport shall besubmitteti to the building department prior to the Certifica#e:of Occupancy being. issued. This report wal'indieate that inspection and testing was completed in conformancemith the approved plans, specifications and approved revisions or addenda, filly .tmresohmd diso6epancics must be detailed in the fine[ report. ® AUG 10 2011 UaddingNowfolder 2010Torm\SPwl"limpectio4fb=docl0125t20t0 SUILDING DEPARTMENT CITY OF EDMONDS Contractor: , The contractor shall provide the special inspector or agency adequate notification of work requiring inspection. The City approved pian and specifications must be made available, at the jobsite for the use of the special inspector and the City inspector. The contractor shall maintain all daily inspection reports, on site, for review by all parties. The special inspection function's are considered to be in addition to the normal inspeclaons performed by the City and the contractor is responsible for contacting the City to schedule regular inspections. No concrete shall be poured or other work covered until approval is givenby the City inspector. Butldlne Deuartment: shall review any revisions and addenda. The City inspector will monitor the special The building department inspection functions for compliance with the agreement and the approved plans. The City inspector shall be responsible foi- approving various stages of construction to be covered and for work to proceed.. . i Desi a Professionals: The architect and/or engimeer'wiill clearly indicate on the plans and specifications the specific types of special inspection required. and shall include a schedule for inspection and testing. The architect and/or engineer will coordinate their revision and addenda process in such a vvay as to insure that all required City approvals are obtained, prior to work shown on the revisions being performed in the field. Owner: The project owner, or the architect or engineer acting as the owners agent, shall employ the special inspeotor or agency. r +ORCOVICN,T A failure of the special inspector or firm to perform in keeping with the requirements of 1B C, approved plans and this document, may, void this agreement and the BuMaS Official's approval of the -apecial inspector. In such a case a new special inspector andlor fm wouldnecd to be proposed for approval. A failuro of the design and/or construction parties to perform in accordance with this agreement may result in a STOP WORK notice being posted on theproj ect until nonconforming items have been resolved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have read And agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. � - • � .�.k�eQ Datt..(��-1 owner :(-42Ei Mk4W`'N Y c„„,f—A Date: —/3-f( S`ignature `Date: e- special h�� E5TI � �/ Signature e: S ? (i 1 P �P• ACCEPTED FOR TSE_ CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPT. By; I.\Banding New poldw 2010 MLg\Spooial inspection (orm.doolOn 12010 RESUB AUG 10 2011 MOILDiNG DEPAFi DENT CITY OF E DWNDS Field Report Report#: 53659 • A.A R Testing Laboratory, Inc..7126 180th Ave N.E.,'Parfc'1.80; Suite C101, Redmond, WA 98052 S :Phone 425:881.5812-Fax,425 Sa1:S441 • Client: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Permit #: BLD 2011468 Seattle, WA 98121 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Contact: Matt Parent Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Inspection Performed: Lateral Framing Date: 2/1/2012 Time: Temperature: ,lorthwest building inspection, second side sheathing installation units 102, 103, 104, 105. ;hear wall panels are nailed off in conformance with 20 / S1.2. Distribution: 7 Distribute Clientd❑ Distribute Contractor Inspector: Panov, Krasimir Distribute Engineer ❑ Distribute Owner 0 Distribute Municipality ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden • • Field Report Report #: 54083 A:A:R. Testing Laboratory; Inc: 7126,11 80th Ave N.E., Park .180,, Suite C101, Redmond, WA 98052, Phone4258.81:5812 Fax 425:881:5441 Client: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Permit #: BLD20110468 Seattle, WA 98121 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Contact: Matt Parent Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Inspection Performed: Lateral Framing • Date: 1/24/2012 Time: Temperature: :or northwest building inspected second side sheathing installation into the units: 101, 205, 206, ?07, 208, 209, 210, 211. Inspected sheathing size, rate, and attachment. All the inspected was in ;onformance with the drawing and engineers RFI #19 on October 28, 2011. Distribution: ❑/ Distribute Client Z Distribute Contractor Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy Q Distribute Engineer ❑ Distribute Owner Q Distribute Municipality ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. • Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden ha Field Report Report#: 53210 Client: Venture General Contracting LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Contact: Matt Parent Inspection Performed: Lateral Framing Date: 12/8/2011 Time: Project Number: 11-248 Permit#: BLD20110468 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Temperature: :or the northeast building, inspected roof diaphragm, the following items were inspected: 'heathing type, size and span rate; nail size, spacing and pattern, truss bracing, HD -7's, A35's ind HD -2's installation at tops of shearwalls and at truss bearing places (for HD's). SII inspected items were in conformance with the approved drawing. W- Distribution: © Distribute Client 0 Distribute Contractor ® Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy Distribute Engineer F-1Distribute Owner R Distribute Municipality ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell a;. ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden Field Report Report#: 53090a Client, Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Permit #: BLD20110468 Seattle, WA 98121 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Contact: Matt Parent Address: 23014123020 Edmonds Way Inspection Performed: Lateral Framing Date: 10/28/2011 Time: Temperature: =or northwest building- Inspected sheathing installation for exterior shearwalls. Inspected sheathing size and spanrate, nail size, spacing and pattern at the following locations: 6/A -C, 4/A - A/1 -2, C/1-2, 1/A -C, A124-25, C/24-25, 25/C -B, 2/A-13, 25/A -C and 24/A -C. All the inspected terns were in conformance with the drawing. Distribution: 7 Distribute Client © Distribute Contractor © Distribute Engineer ❑ Distribute Owner Inspector: Shprits, Yevganiy © Distribute Municipality ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden Field Report Report#: 53089 Client: Venture General Contracting LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Contact: Matt Parent Inspection Performed: See below Date: 10/27/2011 Time: Project Number: 11-248 Permit #: BLD20110468 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Temperature: =or northeast building- performed lateral wood inspection for first floor shearwalls, inspected sheathing size, span rate, nail size, spacing and pattern. All the inspected items were in :onformance with the drawing. Inspected walls at the following locations: A -C/ 8,10, 14, 12 and V4-6 (panels were laying at the floor) and accepted for gypereting. Distribution: V] Distribute Client F-/1 Distribute Contractor ® Distribute Engineer F] Distribute Owner Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy © Distribute Municipality ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the wr(tten consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden Liar Field Report Report 9: 53093 Client: Venture General Contracting LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Contact: Matt Parent Inspection Performed: Lateral Framing Date: 10/24/2011 Time: Project Number: 11-248 Permit#: BL020110468 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Temperature: 1) For northeast building- Inspected 1st level shearwall sheathing and sheathing attachment for he following locations: A/22-12 and C/22-8. All the inspected items (sheathing size, nail size, ;pacing and pattern, as well as using galvanized nails at treated wood) were in conformance with he drawing (sl .2, s2.0a) Distribution: F-/� Distribute Client © Distribute Contractor Distribute Engineer ❑ Distribute Owner Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy [] Distribute Municipality [] Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Architect ❑ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden LA Opw C 1231 Field/Material Report Report #: 75429 A.A:R. Testing Laboratory,nc.7128 180th Ave.N.E., Park 180, Sulte 0101 R edmond, WA 88052 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Phone 425.881.5812 Fax 425.881.5441 " Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468, BLD20110469 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23014123020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/24/2011 Supplier: Concrete NW Air Temperature: 48 F Material Data: Concrete Concrete Temperature: 57 F ASTM C 1064 Plant Number: 125 Air Content: 4.8 % ASTM C 231 Mix Number: 0260A Slump: 4 " ASTM C 143 Time Sampled: 3:40:00 PM Truck Number. C057 Ticket Number: 127275 Added Water: 12 ByWhom: Contractor Number of Samples: 4 Air Entrainment (ozlyard): hoz Admixtures (oz/yard)) : mb200n 23oz Yards placed: 7.5/7.5 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: Northwest Bldg.- Stem walls. Southeast Bldg: Column Footings Grid Lines: NW Bldg. stemwalls- A124-25 and 25/A -D SE Bldg. column footings - C/8.2 and C/9.2 Remarks: Resteel was inspected prior to pour. It was in conformance with drawings (S2.0B and S3.2) by grade , size, and location. Concrete was placed by chute and was mechanically consolidated. E' Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector. Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 113166 10/31/201 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 47640 3790 C 1231 Cone Distribution: ,/ Client W-1 Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: Municipality © Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell C Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. 0 • 0 Field/Material Report Report #: 75426 A A4R:''Testing laboratory, M V71261,180th1Ave:N:E:;.Park 180, Suite CA 01; Redmond, WA�88052 °n . x r � :�= { Y � Phone, 425:881•.5612 Fax 425 881 5441 , � `; .� , Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468,69 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle. WA 98121 Address:' 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/14/2011 Supplier. Concrete NW AIr Temperature: 48 F Concrete Temperature: 58 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete Plant Number. 125 Air Content: 5.0 % ASTM C 231 Mix Number. 0365A55 Slump: 4 1/2 r ASTM C143 Truck Number. C137 Time Sampled: 3:50:00 PM Ticket Number: 127031 Added Water: 5 ByWhom: Contractor Number of Samples: 4 Air, Entrainment (oz/yard): Admixtures (oz/yard)) MBAE-90 4.0 Yards placed: 10.5 of 10.5 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: North building concrete piers at D/1, 3, 5, 7, 9.3 and 12.2. South building columns at G.4/10.1, 10.8, G.7/11.5 and K,U18. Grid Lines: Remarks: Resteel was inspected prior to concrete placement. It was in compliance with the drawing by grade, diameter, location, lap splice and concrete cover. Concrete was placed by pump and mechanically consolidated. ❑Q Conforming to. approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgenly 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39. Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set.# Total Load 112939 10/21/201 1 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 47900 PSI Method Fracture Type 3810 C 1231 Cone Split Distribution: © Client ❑d Contractor ❑ Owner Date Malted: © Municipality Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Field/Material Report Report#: 75218 A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, line. 7126180th Ave.N.E., Park 180, Suite C101, Redmond, WA 98052 Phone 425.881.5812 Faz 425,881.5441 Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Contact: Matt Parent Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Date: 10/12/2011 Project Number: 11-248 Permit # BLD20110468,68 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23014123020 Edmonds Way Grid Lines: North building -D/1-12.3 and south building at 10.1/D -E.1 (partly). Remarks: Steel plates for piers and dowels for columns were distillated per plan. Concrete was placed via pump and mechanically consolidated. Added was less that allowable shown on batch plant ticket. RJ Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Air Temperature: 52 F Area Supplier: Concrete NW PSI Method Fracture Type 112833 10/19/201 Concrete Temperature: 57 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete 2590 C 1231 Shear 112834 11/9/2011 Air Content: 4.5 % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 125 4090 C 1231 Cone 112835 11/9/2011 Slump: 4 3/4 " ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 0365A55 4180 C 1231 Cone 112836 11/9/2011 Time Sampled: 2:05:00 PM 12.6 Truck Number: C151 4310 C 1231 Cone Shear Added Water: -0- ByWhom: Ticket Number: 126905 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : Yards placed: 4 of 4 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: North building, reinforced concrete piers and a south building wall. Grid Lines: North building -D/1-12.3 and south building at 10.1/D -E.1 (partly). Remarks: Steel plates for piers and dowels for columns were distillated per plan. Concrete was placed via pump and mechanically consolidated. Added was less that allowable shown on batch plant ticket. RJ Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112833 10/19/201 7 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 32590 2590 C 1231 Shear 112834 11/9/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 51420 4090 C 1231 Cone 112835 11/9/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 52470 4180 C 1231 Cone 112836 11/9/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 54190 4310 C 1231 Cone Shear Distribution: �i Client © Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: © Municipality RJ Engineer U Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 101.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Field/Material Report Report#: 75216 A.A.R. Testing 1j_o tory,.Irto.:7126 1_8:6 A've.W:E., Park.,1BO,.Sutte 0101, Redmond, tNA'98052 Phone 425:881:5812 Fax -425.881:5441 Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 C 31 C 172 C 39 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468 Set # Total Load Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments 12.6 Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 2 301 4/23 02 0 Edmonds Way Date: 10/12/2011 Air Temperature: 48 F Supplier. Concrete NW Concrete Temperature: 57 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Cement Air Content: 5.8 % ASTM C 231 Plant.Number: 125 Slump: 41/2 ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 0160A Time Sampled: 9:30:00 AM Truck Number: C144 Added Water: 8 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number: 126899 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): 5.0 Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) Yards placed: 21 of 42 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: Patios for north building. . Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via pump and manually consolidated. Water added was less that allowable shown on batch plant ticket. Resteel per plan was not designed. C Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112829 10/19/201 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/3 46490 3700 C 1231 Cone Shear Distribution: ❑d Client 0 Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: ❑�/ Municipality ❑d Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client • and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: South and north buildings wall and column footings. Grid Lines: South -wall footing within grid M -K.9/17-17.2 and M/17-2-18; column footings U18, K/18, G.4110.1 and E.1/6.5. North -wall and column footings at 25/C -D. Remarks: Resteel was inspected prior to concrete placement. It was in conformance with the drawing by grade, size, location, lap splice and concrete cover. Concrete was placed by chute and mechanically consolidated. © Conforming to approved plans inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Field/Material Report Report #: 75217 MaborartorIn- 7128 asoq, ave ME.Ma Park 980, SuEh IR901� Ridm«ttcl. 'WA 88x52 Area °u,ho,425 889.5812 Fax' 425.88! 5 PSI Fracture Type �� ,w 10/17/201 7 4 X B Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468,69 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments 28 Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/10/2011 4820 Supplier: Concrete NW Air Temperature: 48 F Material Data: Concrete Concrete Temperature: 66 F ASTM C 1064 Plant Number. 125 Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Mix Number: 18350E Slump: 4 " ASTM C 143 Truck Number: C137 Time Sampled: Ticket Number: 126838 Added Water: -0- ByWhom: Number of Samples: 4 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Yards placed: 21 of 56 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: South and north buildings wall and column footings. Grid Lines: South -wall footing within grid M -K.9/17-17.2 and M/17-2-18; column footings U18, K/18, G.4110.1 and E.1/6.5. North -wall and column footings at 25/C -D. Remarks: Resteel was inspected prior to concrete placement. It was in conformance with the drawing by grade, size, location, lap splice and concrete cover. Concrete was placed by chute and mechanically consolidated. © Conforming to approved plans inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112825 10/17/201 7 4 X B 12.6 1/1 37420 2980 C 1231 Cone 112826 11/7/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 60500 4820 C 1231 Cone 112827 11/7/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 60690 4830 C 1231 Cone Shear 112828 11/7/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 58730 4680 C 1231 Cone Shear Distribution: © Client ® Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: Municipality © Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly ""' forbidden. Field/Material Report RePont #: 75215 A XR. testing LitE ratt�ry Arte X26 180t{t,Ave W , 'ark 180; 3e�1ie CaD1+ tam WA Mki - shrine 4 5 881 5812 Flax #�'��881 :;` Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23014123020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/6/2011 Supplier: Concrete NW Air Temperature: 48 F Material Data: Concrete Concrete Temperature: 58 F ASTM C 1064 Plant Number: 153 Air Content: 4.6 % ASTM C 231 Mix Number: 150170AG Slump: 4 1/2 " ASTM C 143 Truck Number: C139 Time Sampled: 9:15:00 AM 12.6 1/1 48090 3830 C 1231 Added Water: -0- ByWhom: Ticket Number. 588255 5910 C 1231 Cone 112737 11/3/2011 28 Number of Samples: 4 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): 2.0 Cone Shear Admixtures (oz/yard)): GLEN 25.0 Yards placed: 10 of 10 Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Sections of west sidewalk and curb at Edmonds Way along north building. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via truck chute and manually consolidated J❑ Conforming to approved plans inspector: Shpdts, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112734 10/10/201 4fc 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 48090 3830 C 1231 Cone 112736 11/3/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 74290 5910 C 1231 Cone 112737 11/3/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 78530 6250 C 1231 Cone Shear Distribution: Client rV1 Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: Municipality Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Grid Lines: Pad footings: 1 to 23 on D line, D/1, D/3, D15, D/7, D/9.2, D12.2, D13.5, D/16.5, D/17.8, D/20.8 and D/23; continuous footing: C to D/1 line Remarks: Resteel for each footing conforms to notes on page S2.Oa of approved plans. Slump and temperature tests were performed and a set of four cylinders were cast from concrete placed. Concrete placed via chute and mechanically consolidated. © Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Oliver, Frank 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Field/Material Report Report #: 75440 A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. 71261811th Ave.N.E., Park 180, Suite C101, Redmond, WA 08052 65 F Phone 425.881.5812 Fax 425.881.5441 Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Concrete Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/4/2011 Grid Lines: Pad footings: 1 to 23 on D line, D/1, D/3, D15, D/7, D/9.2, D12.2, D13.5, D/16.5, D/17.8, D/20.8 and D/23; continuous footing: C to D/1 line Remarks: Resteel for each footing conforms to notes on page S2.Oa of approved plans. Slump and temperature tests were performed and a set of four cylinders were cast from concrete placed. Concrete placed via chute and mechanically consolidated. © Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Oliver, Frank 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Air Temperature: 65 F Area Supplier: Concrete NW PSI Method Fracture Type Material Data: Concrete Concrete Temperature: 68 F ASTM C 1064 3/3 38310 Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 313 59520 Slump: 31/4 " ASTM C143 Mix Number: 18350E 28 4 X 8 12.6 Truck Number: CO60 Time Sampled: 2:00:00 PM Cone 112631 11/1/2011 Added Water: 10 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number. 126681 4610 C 1231 Cone Shear Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : Yards placed: 6 Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: Northeast building, column pad footing and portion of continuous footings. Grid Lines: Pad footings: 1 to 23 on D line, D/1, D/3, D15, D/7, D/9.2, D12.2, D13.5, D/16.5, D/17.8, D/20.8 and D/23; continuous footing: C to D/1 line Remarks: Resteel for each footing conforms to notes on page S2.Oa of approved plans. Slump and temperature tests were performed and a set of four cylinders were cast from concrete placed. Concrete placed via chute and mechanically consolidated. © Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Oliver, Frank 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112628 10/11/201 7 4 X 8 12.6 3/3 38310 3050 C 1231 Cone 112629 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 313 59520 4740 C 1231 Cone Shear 112630 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 3/3 59120 4710 C 1231 Cone 112631 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 3/3 57880 4610 C 1231 Cone Shear Distribution: © Client © Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: 0 Municipality © Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. &ar Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Exterior slab: Trash enclosure pad and northwest entrance approach. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via chute and manually consolidated. Temperature, slump and air entrainment tests were performed and a set of cylinders were cast from concrete placed. © Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Oliver, Frank 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Field/Material Report Report #: 75439 A.A.R. Testing Laboratorync. 7126180th Ave.N.E., Park 180 Suite C01, .Redmond, WA 9$052 Area Set # Phone 425.881.5812 Fax 425.881,5441 .. Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110468 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments 2/3 Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23014/23020 Edmonds Way Date: 10/4/2011 112625 11/1/2011 28 Air Temperature: 65 F Supplier: Concrete NW 63100 5020 C 1231 Concrete Temperature: 72 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete 28 4 X 8 12.6 Air Content: 3.8 % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 4870 C 1231 Cone 112627 Slump: 5 " ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 150170AG 12.6 Truck Number: C137 Time Sampled: 12:30:00 PM C 1231 Cone Added Water. 20 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number: 126671 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): 2.4 Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : Glenium 24.7 Yards placed: 21 &ar Design Strength: 3000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Exterior slab: Trash enclosure pad and northwest entrance approach. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via chute and manually consolidated. Temperature, slump and air entrainment tests were performed and a set of cylinders were cast from concrete placed. © Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Oliver, Frank 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112624 10/11/201 7 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 39220 3120 C 1231 Cone 112625 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 63100 5020 C 1231 Cone 112626 1111/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 2/3 61140 4870 C 1231 Cone 112627 11/1/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 213 59860 4770 C 1231 Cone Distribution: 0 Client F/� Contractor U Owner Date Mailed: W Municipality W Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly 400" forbidden. Field Report Report#: 52825 A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. 7126 180th Ave.N.E., Park 180, Suite 0101; Redmond, WA 98052. Phone 425.881.5812 Fax 425.881.5441' Client: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Permit #: See below Seattle, WA 98121 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Contact: Matt Parent Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Inspection Performed: See below Date: 9/30/2011 Time: Temperature: 1) For northwest building (permit BLD2011-0468) inspected epoxy wall dowel installation at slab on grade level for the walls along lines 25/A -C and A/24-25. The dowels were #4 at 18" on center, 6" embedment, 5/8" diameter bit, epoxy was Set XP. Hole preparation, epoxy application and dowel installation were in conformance with Simpson's instruction for use. 2) For southeast building (permit BLD20110469) inspected resteel for columns at basement level at grids F.4/10.1, F.4/10.5 and F.4/7,3 (prior top dowel installation). Resteel was in conformance with the drawing (S-2.OB) and top dowels will be inspected prior to concrete placement. Distribution: L Distribute Client [,#f Distribute Contractor Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy lv!�] Distribute Engineer ::] Distribute Owner Distribute Municipality , Distribute Other Reviewed by: Mike Blackwell Distribute Architect _ Distribute Other All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing is strictly forbidden Field/Material Report Report#: 75202 A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. 7126180th Ave.N.E., Park 180, Suite 6101;Redmond, WA 98052 Phone 425.881.5812 Fax 425.881.5441 Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Perm it# BLD20110468 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan 'Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Date: 9/20/2011 Supplier: Concrete NW Material Data: Concrete Plant Number: 125 Mix Number: 01600 Truck Number: C137 Ticket Number: 126314 Number of Samples: 4 Yards placed: 31 of 83 Design Strength: 3000 Air Temperature: 54 F C 31 Concrete Temperature: 66 F ASTM C 1064 Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Slump: 5 1/4 " ASTM C 143 Time Sampled: 9:15:00 AM 4320 C 1231 Cone Split Added Water: 10 ByWhom: Contractor Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Admixtures (ozlyard)) : Inspection Performed: Reinforced Concrete Location: Northeast building, slab on grade, all units. Grid Lines: Remarks: Insulation, vapor barrier and resteel installed per plan (S2.OA). Concrete was placed via a pump and mechanically consolidated. Added water was less than allowable shown on batch plant ticket. ,v! Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 112275 9/27/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 113 54200 4320 C 1231 Cone Split Distribution: Client Contractor ( owner Date Mailed: [; Municipality Engineer Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell Distribute other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. L CONFIRMATION #: FOELD MATERDAL TEST REPORT Mate lag Repoot Humbeir: J5011 0 A.A.R. TESTING LABORATORY, INC. Inspection Type "File No: I'- ;Z7/ Date: P.O. Box 2523 CEMENT P(Pipct:'11 irg-Z,� ItAY A r.� Redmond, WA Phone (425) 881-5812 Grids0 Add('e'ss':*1-..,,,�' 98073 Fax (425) 881-5441 ri"Z", k:F- 7Y S citngy. ine %7,0 gg Engine e r'.. CLIENT: ; eiiMPt &Itk Pert-1No!:- /Cv mi ATTHc Contractor: vi, Xi •MATERIAL DATA -FIELD: CONCRETE/MASONRY: �Cl 43 ASTM C231 ASTM C173 ASTM C140 CONFORMING TO APPROVED PLANS X YES 13 NO Explain it "NO" (S:TMC71 7 �2 Inspection Performed/Location Inspection Type k TIME:, ACTUAL CEMENT Location � yx F&5-✓ A C_ 6 Grids0 A ri"Z", k:F- 7Y Remarks ; eiiMPt &Itk ,9 �Tki: yh?l ,g_4�L cse-,,C4rr uM X& 11C_4_zz_1y ifCURING 4� J77 -yr(�. FA7 tOl,' /ft49-4i:'L WATER •MATERIAL DATA -FIELD: CONCRETE/MASONRY: �Cl 43 ASTM C231 ASTM C173 ASTM C140 CONFORMING TO APPROVED PLANS X YES 13 NO Explain it "NO" (S:TMC71 7 �2 ASTM C138 ASTM C1019 r ASTM C1064 MATERIAL DATA -LABORATORY: CONCRETE: ASTM C78 ASTM C39 ASTM C192 ASTM C617 ASTM C1231 ASTM C42 SUPPLIER AGES/ (FC) PLANT NO. MIX NUMBER TRUCK NO. # TICKET NO A AIR SPECIFICATION SLUMP SPEC, AIR CONTENT SLUMP (1e-7Vcje!Zj-F Al L80 ACTUAL CEMENT #OF SAMPLES.: SET NUMBER- SIZE YARDS PLACED DESIGN STRENGTH AMBIENT TEMP. CONCRETE TEMP. FLY ASH yVR bIA- I%lt ifCURING • INSPECTOR: Wmi-05 REVIEWER: REPORTED. BATCH DATA MATERIAL TYPE CEMENTTYPE DESIGN (LBS.) ACTUAL CEMENT FLY ASH SAND AGGREGATES tO AGGREGATES (e WATER ADMIXTURES ADMIXTURES AIR ENTRAINMENT. ADDED WATER By wtionn: ALL REPORTS ARE CON DERED CONFIDENTIAL AND ARE THE PROPERTY OF CLIENT AND AAR TESTING. LABORATORY INC. REPRODUCTION EXCEPT IN FULL, WITHOUT T1 iE WnrTTE11 CONSENT OF MR TESTING IS STRICTLY FORBIDDEN, 11 Field/Material Report Report#: 74960 A.&R.' Testing t aboratOry, i0c.14 2618100 Phone 4Z5:E Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Contact: Matt Parent Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Date: 8/16/2011 Project Number: 11.248 Permit # BLD20110411 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Grid Lines: Remarks: Sampling concrete for tests only. Concrete was placed via pump. Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Air Temperature: 51 F Size Supplier: Cadman Set # Total Load PSI Method Concrete Temperature: 65 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 49810 Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 30 9/13/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 Slump: 5 11ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 4PMP806 Cone Shear 111485 9/13/2011 28 Time Sampled: 9:30:00 AM 1/1 Truck Number: 0298 5490 C 1231 Cone Split 111486 Added Water: 4 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number: 995191 1/1 71590 5700 C 1231 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) Yards placed: 11 of 20 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Pile #'s 44-49+. Grid Lines: Remarks: Sampling concrete for tests only. Concrete was placed via pump. Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 111483 8/23/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 49810 3970 C 1231 Cone 111484 9/13/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 111 71300 5680 C 1231 Cone Shear 111485 9/13/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 69010 5490 C 1231 Cone Split 111486 9/13/2011 28 4 X 8 .12.6 1/1 71590 5700 C 1231 Cone Split Distribution: V Client �/, Contractor [] Owner Date Mailed: Municipality 41 Engineer (; Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. sr ' EP 19 2011 I, EVLo -,, rr- JfENTSERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Soldier pile Vs 36-51. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed by chute at above locations. Concrete sampling for compressive strength only. * Added on site. Wj Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI 111471 8/22/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 53840 4290 Method Fracture Type C 1231 Shear AUG u 0 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR, Distribution: 0 Client [; Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: CIN OF EdaMOND': Lvj Municipality Fo' Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Field/Material Report Report#: 74959 p ?t iaa 726 180thp E ,r p�1ri:SQt, pAveeptiN 4�i �2S V V7 `Yv� TX '. � : a v'ic . CS3,`vk ,"-�� Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110411 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Date: 8/1512011 Supplier: Air Temperature: 50 F Cadman Material Data: Concrete Temperature: 68 F ASTM C 1064 Concrete Plant Number: Air Content: % ASTM C 231 54 Mix Number: 4PMP806 Slump: 51/4 " ASTM C 143 Truck Number: 0305 Time Sampled: 9:45:00 AM Ticket Number: Added Water: 7 ByWhom: Contractor 995005 Number of Samples: Air Entrainment (ozlyard): 4 Yards placed: 11 of 20 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : GLEN 15.0* Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Soldier pile Vs 36-51. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed by chute at above locations. Concrete sampling for compressive strength only. * Added on site. Wj Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI 111471 8/22/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 53840 4290 Method Fracture Type C 1231 Shear AUG u 0 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR, Distribution: 0 Client [; Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: CIN OF EdaMOND': Lvj Municipality Fo' Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Soldier piles #'s 64-73. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via a pump. Sampled concrete for compressive strength testing. ' Added on site. [v] Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load 111422 8/19/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 45960 PSI Method Fracture Type 3660 C 1231 Shear AUG 3 0 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Distribution: Client Contractor _ j Owner Date Mailed: �I Municipality Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Field/Material Report Report#: 74958 A.A.R. Tastitt� I.�b�ira�tRry� �Ir� 7.9�2�}�'fJ80f+thA4AAv�eataF E � PyBrk 1 8�t�ita ;y`�1Q =�y{ � � ,� "'{•'Ck �.++, , hV,V 1M TV 1 �i� ��i�2�R �2 `i " " ..... , „l��s Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110411 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Date: 8/12/2011 Air Temperature: 56 F Supplier: Cadman Concrete Temperature: 66 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 30 Slump: 53/4 " ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 4PMP806 Time Sampled: 12:30:00 PM Truck Number: 0285 Added Water: 4 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number: 994848 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) : GLEN7500 7.0` Yards placed: 20 of 20 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Soldier piles #'s 64-73. Grid Lines: Remarks: Concrete was placed via a pump. Sampled concrete for compressive strength testing. ' Added on site. [v] Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load 111422 8/19/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 45960 PSI Method Fracture Type 3660 C 1231 Shear AUG 3 0 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Distribution: Client Contractor _ j Owner Date Mailed: �I Municipality Engineer ❑ Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. Field/Material Report Report #: 74950 AAA. Testing;! at oratory; lnc. 7126180th Ave'N.E.. Park 1801 'UkA Gfbf' 13edlrtand. W ►° SQ 2 . Phone 425 881.1812 Fax 425.88154+sk1, Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Project Number: 11-248 Contact: Matt Parent Permit # BLD20110411 Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Seattle, WA 98121 Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Date: 8/11/2011 Grid Lines: Remarks: On site for the following: 1) Concrete placed by chute at above locations. IV Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Biisserd, Jonathan (JD) 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Air Temperature: 58 F Size Supplier: Cadman Set # Total Load PSI Method Concrete Temperature: 70 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 50670 Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 30 9/8/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 Slump: 6 " ASTM C143 Mix Number: 4PMP806 Shear 111398 9/8/2011 28 Time Sampled: 10:00:00 AM 1/1 Truck Number: 273 5550 C 1231 Shear 111399 Added Water: N/A ByWhom: Ticket Number: 994564 1/1 73240 5830 C 1231 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) Yards placed: 10 of 10 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Soldier piles #52, 53 and 54. Grid Lines: Remarks: On site for the following: 1) Concrete placed by chute at above locations. IV Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Biisserd, Jonathan (JD) 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load PSI Method Fracture Type 111396 8/18/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 50670 4030 C 1231 Cone 111397 9/8/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 72590 5780 C 1231 Shear 111398 9/8/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 69670 5550 C 1231 Shear 111399 9/8/2011 28 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 73240 5830 C 1231 Cone Split Distribution: i% Client d' Contractor ❑ Owner Date Mailed: n Municipality se, Engineer `J Architect Tested By: Mike Blackwell ❑ Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly ,ewe► forbidden. F �, .-.h* SEP 19 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Cfk. CITY OF EDMONDS • u \ EDMONDS WAY APARTMENTS \ MONITOR REPORT \\ 09/14/11 „Q., EXIST. CONC. P RET. WALL „0„ SET REFLECTOR N ON RET. WALL "M" (TYPICAL) L„ SET REFLECTOR ON NEW PILING (TYPICAL) NEW RET. WALL \ �o �G i 0� ASPHALT p \ WALK A O� I S,. �6 \ f� „T„ C „U, I- A „K„ 1O „J" SET TACK IN I.. LEAD IN CURB (TYPICAL) ' v" PROPOSED H.. BUILDING T „X....Y„ .,Z„ „AA„ „G„ SET PUNCH ON�G "F" TOP OF PILE (TYPICAL) "DD" "EE" „FF„ E.. "GG" JJ„ "KK,. HH ,.11„ "JJ" „LL" „A„ „B„ „G„ SET PK IN ASPHALT (TYPICAL) 232ND ST SW RECEIVED SEP 15 2011 CTR. DEVELOPMENTSEN CITY OF CE S L_ C CD 0 O ILI a N Z 0 LU 0 m O ol co S 5 q G 000 s s 0 m p 0 0 0 0 5 pp p 0 m m + 0 0 4 0 U m C O, C C O O C U N 9666606 Ci 0 00 W Lu V G C O 000000" O O O T O s Q 0 C C O O O O o O co O O C O O Cl G �p C + OOO T T W U W 500000 0 U W 0a0oor�0 V W 53 5000 m m 0 0 0 0 0+ s C O UIRRC!oq O T O O CD CT! T O U Z Oo 0000000000000 Ua0 ZC G O O D J2Zom ., p(rt)FO 00 a� ainUOU��HF- �CleXle 00000 U C) C)U 01- G a' p W►iC7x- X�Y >>C YAC O a' `o' O 00000 1-�HHHH UUUVU 40.adLL 8LLlU� o � 95-1 Ctt t U luLUUj _J X.O wWwww O -1 ° _j T O cl NM C3 00 O CO) m m O a0 co -TT" p' OCD CDtf1CDCDOC4a[? OCANtati r r 4. cO�LSCaD r! V �N _ gWcM+7�Pi s r ��_pp marts oW �p _ a�% s00 00 CDM c0'�c�c�i t�f epi c�e�i QW cr) Cco �+T N 0MOCMtt t--10 co iii =T M1 CO O NCi 4f r IR CD =T M1CDT ci�T� � M1 � �TTCD'�ii NN C2 T W (Np��pMT�pc�ppCO �0ppf Cb N T MM �NeRiFmR M CO2MNNN 04 �c T� S ii00 t@pc�ENN cVNNN M M M N N OW M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M =rT O0M10OT M1Uf1MTq� ' T V000CD MQTON M to SN co 7T V C NT OCDOCoC] TMG)Os It 0 �n mer �T T G +�r CDN�p$ 06 r- CV M ^ O 'T T �Z C m M MODm NOG! p z V V- V V- V /� A co w1� CA O "vf� L p Ian T •^ T c0 T m T r 0 T — p aDCDCDM1 T T T T O N N N N N N ��j N 5 z N N N N N N N Z N N N N oo� 'CM9 il " ' a o o490 ' sags CO) d U� C iW+ N O O co co) Ol co T O MMM777 C�5 T G CR cp :� Up m o ice' Wp T C O a co d'QW m pMpRR�apii�.p��ptttOpI�NpCTp MMMc+�Mc��lc�c+f ��llJ 0 M So�mc�c�lc+f �p �p �p �GW p� �p �p00 c�iWma Qg1T L T G �0 CD CD Cq 1-z 0 M1 O�mN M 4M9 JT M1CD WN M1 C! T r OTO, �p �A JT Z T m��q C N N Nf NNMOM� aI1n M W 5 S4MNOCDtt?M McOMMNNN C3'— T TN CS co, co (0V)Mm� co- �p R �� O W HERR 0 W O W NOo C3 Q O Q `N JT � COOM1M1T�}�ODO M1 � tn TQiTp� .t0 J �WOCDppm CIQTC]Nh J < �M1M1QlN ��FO�p�pp C1 r C�Z � O NTTM{ppr •f W CO C CD OAnI® O � _�r.� CDS rCpr CDNaD�j N M M1 O Z TO Cb C .= w C11l S c)�CO 0oZ � Q T � T mmmoNNNN vT � T aD !� O► T N T T T T T T T T T 05z CD T T !^ CD T I r 0Qa NNNNN N NNNN OrNMTNM�tl1 o000ir�. G C p CDM1CDdDOTN T� rNiVNM1 �� N'O MSO NNM1NN M1 M1M1M1M1h M1 Q a M1M1 M1!� • r- - L -A F w a a ni d to 0 Z 0 to m O) 03 Q co O U n LY m 0 Z O U a N Z U O 0 0. W J m Cn N Q Z O O �ppp-I O b O00o000000 lc�lc�lc�l rOS]ro0.- Ca Q O00 t Q O O O O O QOt000C 0300 0 0 U ui a�cm cc c lUJ goc�a�000*-ago�o?oo 0 oQvvovo o00000000a000e7QoQ V m cm cm cm t v oovvoovv$ooOQvoov a o o r v v o r r p r r r 0 Co v Z e�0000eaoovdooQd000 CL Q ZZZ22 2 VUU UVUVUUV = = 2 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z aaaaaaaaa,.aaaaa�-a.aa O j LS r r r C co cnCDm��mmCDCD�mCOhen[p� en N ep N M �- O O F r �p IA CA ��ra rl�lnlV rrtnlflcpCfl~I�ItinID[VC CD c7 Cn7 C4f)C)C)C)CC17cco)(4) CO) m )c 0)C) � r APpnn000�ODNN I� V: In CO W P% Gqm W)0 ci CD N NM crl 0 KS 0 C rc+loOO �ncnn.0 Lc) olSpM(c+pT�Cgpry� C7mMCil M C�1u700��0ppt�NDp ClMr- cq pU, cV AR S$ salgescVs C7 c+1 V) er1C.) CV) comC4e+1McMC.1chMM •^C2 0 ON t 00r•N OO co naoraM4m (4Pn .- O co LC) 1• LO W1. cC) U) r- qr �p CO C, OVr C%J e- ONet0crinC6 CO I- ,wqtv*,d� CD an C� st CA to CA CO CA M a co rr C cAoLnu) rrrr Ln mit d C6 QZ �C4.cm ccrpp.-.�rrrr.rrrprpf�rr NN(O�JNryCC44 OWN N N N N N cv N N N N N N N N C r 00 mOrC4m enionaowo��lc�n �a c+fMMC��C�fMCc�'��7lMc'�MMMi'!c'>MM Q Z� r C 0 inN�NCONQOICpCA�rC7K)W mo reocDtCKfPti� doi-�to�i3 r >l i tiwootiti��ti� �O W C*mMMMcn Innl�.ni CO) enco cr)V) C7 C7 c9 J Zq r _ C*4Il- N t� 'It bOsOfCpONNC4�OD 't Iq cq CV co M Ci r ehcc Sa Mmomc In rl- Go YaC�Yty (cwyMC(D+�c+�c+� AA A mV)r- 0'LUINNC�i rcrpV.-T a(( �NN° CCV(VCVN�NM�NpNa�Mo�p NCOv C�iN C7MMCbMMcefMcM1C9CSMMtococD m �1 r MtoGo �c9NCD000A�CDat�nMCO nPNODt►n0 CDppNf� OMP- aD 2 NamCt?OODd t �m �in O O E O Z MCnwtnIn N %-- N n- N V-�y N Cr��r��-jj N N govV Nrr-T--r�-e�rrF N N N N N Vv N 1-voc) �CK7CAO O NNc'7c'SMMe+fa Cn,�p r-nnl. r-nl-nnnrnnnnr-n m O) 03 Q co O U n LY m 0 Z O U a N Z U O 0 0. W J m Cn N Q Z • 0 • \ EDMONDS WAY APARTMENTS \ MONITOR REPORT \\ 09/09/11 „Q„ EXIST. CONC. P RET. WALL. "0" SET REFLECTOR N ON RET. WALL „M" (TYPICAL) „L„ cep �C) �G O� ASPHALT p \ WALK .0 p S„ SET REFLECTnP ON NEW PILING (TYPICAL) NEW \RET. WALL F- SET PUNCH ON CC "F" TOP OF PILE "DD" (TYPICAL) "EE" FF„ "GG" 'HH""II" "JJ" "KK" "LL" SET PK IN ASPHALT (TYPICAL) 232ND ST SW RECEIVED SEP 12 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTFi. CITY OF EOMONIriS /�� „ K„ yO J SET TACK IN I r LEAD IN CURB 1 (TYPICAL) V" PROPOSED H„ BUILDING „W, ..X,. ,.Y„ ..Z„ "AA„ „G„ „BB„ SET PUNCH ON CC "F" TOP OF PILE "DD" (TYPICAL) "EE" FF„ "GG" 'HH""II" "JJ" "KK" "LL" SET PK IN ASPHALT (TYPICAL) 232ND ST SW RECEIVED SEP 12 2011 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTFi. CITY OF EOMONIriS E, O C 0 4 O Z O m 0 V N V N V N N . V 1V -4 N -4 V V V w J ivi J O V o 0 O o y -0(J" CO o OmaDVm �m a V.wN-+WNjO a N 1313131313 mmmmco N N Z 00 N NNNNI N N NN aoao Z0 pO IVNNNNNNN13 Zvi pO i Vc00000w J J J i 0 9D— OmOcO i O i i W�j .r► J J t7�A J 1 6— apapapapaptpmmm i O J J Otppp J J J� AAAA _^ J o 7 1 J(,] mWruCA V 1MJ� ?O co co 0 ?QD Cn 3000 W 1113 ?O 54 PMJ iZ mr.�m000mOo r, 1340 OOOAA V V sY r A�1Npp WQOODOmA iOtfl �D f" p OapVAiV AaD�tp�Cf►f3►�3 VmOD 1 r wwwnww m�'O to inisc CA nwwwwww ��'a� m om wwwwNwNwNwwww "gNNNNN(ppN"p� m oO v� O O c'S� p NNN �(�11 CD �— O CD w cftWCh 000(�,� W WCDOf W NN y W CT ODONW � 00— W A W V V 011 J W J (r�JO CP wNNO w iZ 1r 00J�V w �ZZ O -*V JwV 4CD00 3 JZ O�•CD i__jul � iD r �p AJA.tT(nwV ODp0 wNWOD iD r ChO wODwANOwQN aD-�oVV-+Ch �D r a1 ODwCbCPCD0001 � �� WO��ODvvOwO m 0, AODODODO aa'c6o'cr�'ccS'°ID°� <IL ,+NWWAChC1 < O� JNW�VGOWODW < J� Go0fAco a �� V co W�WC34m p 91 co �OOo W O N �D 3 rg� wwwwwwc�www 0 o Q r p o 0 0 o Q 4 �D 0 * WwwwwwwW o op O O Q Q o 0 OWD Lr C V D _,L O i N W 0 C 0Q00 W N J O W co W co C-2 V4 (0 f NNN NN"'�NNN 13131313131313"' OOO J i i Z� 0 mm�comcoO Z� mmmapapcDO� AZa �o a0o fQ�l w tp�f1 �ONO� wA ao �C ( mmaoAAAA ?J cow00 o QIM V V =,pC �� VAN 4,hL-4 NmCSmOmPO A fo -4-86 -+aD J -►CrtA V W00/010A CO V V 0 c W @off W W co W W W W W W co w w w w w w W �m Q �mmisw0) o� *W J : (m i1 �C co 0 3 �__ c o V V w J ym i+ 3 Ta O• -*,I�W-V coob WWv 613613 J� w-4cn P. __j J�'► NSA W O WON -+ 00 W�,t 00 W 00 �Q 10 < iP i www W i W N Cf ww C� W Ch of mo 10 < �0wwwwwww 1A N OD Cf W V V mo 10 < C *CW1aA r �° O (PC MCIO0 41 4t DaDUOD O ,0= * AChC01WChODp W W V� V m W W W W °.�mC O Coo 1.h 00 3 i VOWtD i000 3 j OD wO W •i 3 j� TT TA-+(TTO mmmmm 00 �3 mm mm �m 00 rrrrl mmmmm - rrrrrrr vvvvvvv r- N c�c�nve��4a�.� 00cmi�min�� A-1-i-IOnaoD XXCKo ��-1�� 00000 �i,Zlo�i:i 0 0 7C�—x0-nm 7CA7CAAA `0 � 0 -i 00000 0 m 0 a a XXXM� o C�caX10 -00Z$r c c 000 oaoo000 oaa±�aaao rQQa r oao000C3 *g000aooc 0000000 m om o (D c9 00o am, 000aapoo � oapooCpD0o r 0 0 0 r O 0 0 i O p g g = , r pi OJ Q 0 0 0 0 po O 0) m � o 606 0000006m 000000.6.6 r 000 r m<Q� 000 ��j OO p 6000400 Q 0 0 0 3 o ® o m V p 0 J J r'4 v A RECEVVED SEP 12 2011 OEVELOWiEOFN fl SERVICES CTR CITY EOMONOS N J O m O Z v CD m v a m Z co a 0 m W 7 m a m 0 m co m' m v c m O 0 O Z c -1 O z O c n _J O N • N 0 V J►AV V AWwG r W CA ft4 W V W NNa,(A 0V AWNOmco VO W amOD40► a NR"sN�Nr'.'%s'�`iN�►N"N'N��."itN�.�i�.i"O mmm m W40 4 m co z�� i A?AA i i .J i i AAAcnW i j J i i i �V c.TN 1 W -4 i a" j &n -4 W a) wWWW 00OD04LN0OD46tA000 N-j'Do V -4 a �Z bo V Viob�L NOOOAWM-4-40 V OWin 0, mmpp V AD)CAw WNth D f - www W(A WW g wwWwww "19 mox W W O N OD N W N W AV N N W N W NW W W �t N i i m i -4V1 J J 0 Z �1WCD pcpa W c710aD0CS j W Wlco WCOlf L" K) 0cooA94 61 -NOLnf io �•W+rc" wwWwwwWWwwwww caww VV ONOeVV-4-4m VVVV+rIV>VVV+iVV V T �•` OODcOnm O VOD :7tO10Adc7� O N Wi WNcm— Vi6 Qw .�<+ p i � J wwww 0000000 www 0o0rb''c Wo Wo w �0a Ww pC v� WN OtoCD co r" c mcommmcoWmm J i i J .i J i i i f i i WW r► •.,► 1 coo i J Zb� (o!o!o0pODOD�NbCD AAA W W W AAAA c7f V ••• w V V�0 rl r V rm to AL 3 C (Acp7p0L"!W � �—• 4- CDWAGD�-j -4 -j-4 (v cpca lLnl W aa�I W W W W a&��1s��w W W W W W W W W W W W W o> W NOOc7�W(�1w:�1�(�11W WNNNNNNNNN��jjN-+-+i-� W W WNiW-Jcl�U� V W!DAAA W W W c710fDOWJ �� pW W(AlvWDWCaNNoComcoDa�oV�Wtw.t pW WWW N :A �+a �` CAWCA r 4 v 4-4-4 V (A (il cawWWWWw -4 (?I -4 .•.1 i —4 N a tip V V .i J m ca Wc7�cr &V D nc a-&"WWmWc" : 0ic ccccc000020200 cccccccCC C cC vo zzzz l J x Z♦ I 2 Z ZX 22 ZX § zx T=on zx Z c c z =A Z 02=n x o r -;K Y0Tmvvnawo�N-<X*C � 06.o0opo0ocoaooa0o o o O p J .0 O 4 0 O O G; i o J 0 O 0� O pp C 4Q O 0 O 0 b 000 d 00 m _? W 00000000000000006 m �oQo�o�oaog�scc�g� � � c� Q O O O G O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 m oocogobooboobb$oo 0 0 0 0 O O O i 0 0 1 0 0 0 _ 0 E N W m v z O C M At 9 m z 0 0 X CD m 3 d 0 m SEP 12 2011 DEVELOPMENT ECTR IT( OF DMONDS Ma Field/Material Report Report #: 74960 A A R.;7esting l:ab�ratory, Inc. 7,11261 80th Ave.N.E:,Park, 180j, S_ C1gi,.Fi r til Phone42�,8 Client Name: Venture General Contracting LLC Contact: Matt Parent Client Address: 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 Date: 8/16/2011 Project Number: 11-248 Permit# BLD20110411 Project Name: Edmonds Way Apartments Address: 23012 Edmonds Way Grid Lines: Remarks: Sampling concrete for tests only. Concrete was placed via pump. W Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load 111483 8/23/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 49810 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: PSI Method Fracture Type 3970 C 1231 Cone Distribution: C1 Client !Jj Contractor L I Owner Date Mailed: %; Municipality [VI Engineer I. ] Architect Tested By: Mike Holtz Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. CJC.1^ 5 �Z70 v'k:',A', :t� %..~ :ti::C;:. '7`J SEP trya 11 DEVELOPIJ AT SERVICES 1 R. CITY OF EDMONDS Air Temperature: 51 F Supplier: Cadman Concrete Temperature: 65 F ASTM C 1064 Material Data: Concrete Air Content: % ASTM C 231 Plant Number: 30 Slump: 5 11ASTM C 143 Mix Number: 4PMP806 Time Sampled: 9:30:00 AM Truck Number: 0298 Added Water: 4 ByWhom: Contractor Ticket Number: 995191 Air Entrainment (oz/yard): Number of Samples: 4 Admixtures (oz/yard)) Yards placed: 11 of 20 Design Strength: 4000 Inspection Performed: Concrete Location: Pile #'s 44-49+. Grid Lines: Remarks: Sampling concrete for tests only. Concrete was placed via pump. W Conforming to approved plans Inspector: Shprits, Yevgeniy Samples Tested in Accordance with ASTM: C 1231 C 31 C 172 C 39 Sample ID Test Date Age Size Area Set # Total Load 111483 8/23/2011 7 4 X 8 12.6 1/1 49810 2nd Inspector: 3rd Inspector: PSI Method Fracture Type 3970 C 1231 Cone Distribution: C1 Client !Jj Contractor L I Owner Date Mailed: %; Municipality [VI Engineer I. ] Architect Tested By: Mike Holtz Distribute Other Reviewed: Mike Blackwell All tests in accordance with the requirements of ASTM C 31 for casting and curing concrete specimens in the field excluding Section 10.1.2 (required use of a maximum -minimum thermometer). All reports are considered confidential and are the property of the client and A.A.R. Testing Laboratory, Inc. Reproduction except in full, without the written consent of A.A.R. Testing Laboratory is strictly forbidden. CJC.1^ 5 �Z70 v'k:',A', :t� %..~ :ti::C;:. '7`J SEP trya 11 DEVELOPIJ AT SERVICES 1 R. CITY OF EDMONDS VO zot t 6 S2&/ VQ? April 13, 2012 ES -2039.02 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC 2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 310 Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Mr. Matt Parent Subject: Final Letter — Geotechnical Services Edmonds Way Apartments 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington Reference: Earth Solutions NW, LLC Geotechnical Engineering Study ES -2039, dated April 6, 2011 Earth Solutions NW, LLC Photo and Survey Monitoring Program Document ES -2039.01, dated June 9, 2011 Dear Mr. Parent: Earth Solutions NW«C Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical Engineering • Construction Monitoring • Environmental Sciences APR 2 3 2012 DEVELOPMENT ERVIC SS CTR. CIT In accordance with your request, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) provided geotechnical monitoring and testing services during the shoring and earthwork phases of construction. Services were provided between August 2011 and March 2012. Geotechnical monitoring and testing included the following: Temporary and permanent soldier pile wall installation — An ESNW representative was onsite during the soldier pile wall installation to confirm pile embedment depths and soil conditions. Periodic site visits were also conducted during the excavation and lagging to confirm soil "cut face" stability. Based on our observations, the soldier pile wall installation was completed in general accordance with the approved plans and our geotechnical recommendations. Coordination with project surveyor in implementation of site monitoring program (soldier pile wall / adjacent right-of-ways and existing structures) — Prior to beginning the site earthwork activities, ESNW met with the contractor and project surveyor to confirm frequency and locations of survey points for the site monitoring program. Guidelines provided in the referenced Photo and Survey Monitoring Program Document were reviewed and implemented as applicable. Monitoring points were established along adjacent right-of-ways, soldier piles, and existing structures (where appropriate). 1805 -136th Place N.E., Suite 201 0 Bellevue, WA 98005 • (425) 449-4704 0 FAX (425) 449-4711 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC PES -2039.02 April 13, 2012 Page 2 Review of survey monitoring data and confirmation of shoring wall performance — Hansen Surveying collected the monitoring data during the 'excavation and shoring phases of construction. Baseline data (prior to the start of earthwork) were collected on July 19, 2011. Monitoring continued through substantial completion of the earthwork. The last set of monitoring data was collected on December 5, 2011. Periodic visual observations by the undersigned and his representative were also performed as part of the overall monitoring program. Based on the monitoring data and visual observations, excavation related movements were insignificant, and generally within the horizontal and vertical positional accuracy of the surveying instrument (0.02 feet). In this respect, the excavation and soldier pile shoring systems demonstrated good performance. Confirmation of building foundation subgrade and allowable soil bearing capacity — Foundation subgrade soil was observed and tested (as necessary) to confirm acceptable bearing conditions. The building foundation soils were observed to be acceptable for foundation bearing and the design allowable soil bearing capacity of 5,000 psf. Confirmation of slab -on -grade and pavement subgrade stability — Areas of pavement and slab -on -grade subgrade were observed and tested (as necessary) to confirm stability and acceptable support characteristics. The pavement and slab -on -grade subgrade was observed to be acceptable for support of these structures. Compaction testing of structural backfill soils — Compaction testing of structural fill soils was completed as necessary during the earthwork phase of construction. Field density tests were conducted in accordance with ASTM Test Designation D2922 (Nuclear Gauge Method). Two representative soil samples were returned to our laboratory for analysis of the maximum dry density and optimum moisture content in accordance with ASTM D1557-02 (Modified Proctor). Density test results indicated an acceptable level of relative compaction at the tested locations. Based on our observations and testing, and to the best of our knowledge, it is our opinion the earthwork construction was accomplished in general accordance with the approved plans and our geotechnical recommendations. We trust this final letter and summary of geotechnical services meets your current needs. Should you require additional information, or have questions, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, Raymond A. Coglas, P.E. Principal cc: Mr. Bruce Moe (Email only) Earth Solutions NW, LLC October 10, 2011 ES -2039.02 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC 2801 Alaskan Way Suite 310 Seattle, Washington 98121 Attention: Mr. Matt Parent Subject: Addendum Report ECDC 23.80.070 — Specific Hazards Proposed Apartment Complex 23014 Edmonds Way Edmonds, Washington Reference: Earth Solutions NW Geotechnical Engineering Study (and sieve data) ES -2039, dated April 6, 2011 Dear Mr. Parent: 'arch Solutions ihI W tic Earth Solutions NW LLC • Geotechnical bigineering • Construction Monitoring; • Environmental Sciences In accordance with the request of the City of Edmonds, Earth Solutions NW, LLC (ESNW) has prepared this addendum to the original geotechnical report referenced above. Specifically, the city has requested that we address development standards as they relate to alterations and development within erosion and landslide hazard areas. With respect to alterations of erosion or landslide hazard areas, ECDC 23.80.060 specifies the following: A, Erosion and Landslide Hazard Areas. Activities on sites containing erosion or landslide hazards shall meet the requirements of ECDC 23.80.060, Development Standards — General Requirements, and the specific following requirements: 2. Alterations. Alterations of an erosion or landslide hazard area and/or buffer may only occur for activities for which a hazards analysis is submitted and certifies that: a. The development will not increase surface water discharge or sedimentation to adjacent properties beyond predevelopment conditions; b. The development will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties; and c. Such alterations will not adversely impact other critical areas; '1805 - 136th Place. N.E., Suite 201 4 Bellevue, WA 96005 0 ( 425) 449-4104 • FAX 142.i) 419-4714 GRE Edmonds Way, LLC October 10, 2011 ES -2039.02 Page 2 With respect to the above criteria regarding alteration of erosion or landslide hazard areas, the following is concluded from the earlier geotechnical study (referenced above), and subsequent observations during the recent earthwork phase of the project: Surface water will be collected and infiltrated onsite. Any surface water that leaves the site would enter the existing storm system along Edmonds Way, and would not be a sediment laden discharge. The development envelope is located along Edmonds Way, and at the base of any surrounding sloped topography. Engineered retaining walls support excavations along the development perimeter where sloping topography exists. In this respect, the development will not decrease slope stability on adjacent properties. a Based on the findings of our original study, soils are comprised largely of competent native advance outwash and glacial till deposits. Overall stability throughout the site and surrounding properties can be characterized as good. Given the observed construction of shored excavations and permanent engineered retaining structures, development related alterations to the site will not impact other critical areas. With respect to design standards related to development within erosion or landslide hazard areas, ECDC 23.80.060 specifies the following: 3. Design Standards. Development within an erosion or landslide hazard area and/or buffer shall be designed to meet the following basic requirements unless it can be demonstrated that an alternative design that deviates from one or more of these standards provides greater long-term slope stability while meeting all other provisions of this title. The requirement for long-term slope stability shall exclude designs that require regular and periodic maintenance to maintain their level of function. The basic development design standards are: a. The proposed development shall not decrease the factor of safety for landslide occurrences below the limits of 1.5 for static conditions and 1.2 for dynamic conditions. If stability at the proposed development site is below these limits, the proposed development shall provide practicable approaches to reduce risk to human safety and improve the factor of safety for landsliding. In no case shall the existing factor of safety be reduced for the subject property or adjacent properties; b. Structures and improvements shall be clustered to avoid geologically hazardous areas and other critical areas; c. Structures and improvements shall minimize alterations to the natural contour of the slope, and foundations shall be tiered where possible to conform to existing topography; Earth Solutions NW; LLC GRE Edmonds Way, LLC October 10, 2011 ES -2039.02 Page 3 d. Structures and improvements shall be located to preserve the most critical portion of the site and its natural landforms and vegetation; e. The proposed development shall not result in greater risk or a need for increased buffers on neighboring properties; f. The use of retaining walls that allow the maintenance of existing natural slope area is preferred over graded artificial slopes; and g. Development shall be designed to minimize impervious lot coverage; With respect to the above criteria regarding development within erosion or landslide hazard areas, the following is concluded from the earlier geotechnical study (referenced above), and subsequent observations during the recent earthwork phase of the project: « The development envelope is located along the base of areas of sloping topography, primarily located along the west margins of the development envelope. Excavations along the base of the existing sloping topography utilized engineered soldier pile wall - shoring systems and permanent engineered concrete retaining walls. The engineered retaining structures are designed to support areas of sloping topography. In this respect; stability is not decreased as a result of the development activity. Static and seismic factors -of -safety with respect to slope stability meet (or exceed) the minimum required values of 1.5 and 1.2 (static and seismic, respectively). • To the degree possible, clustering .of structures to minimize disturbance to sloped areas of the property was accomplished. w The structures and related improvements were. located in a manner that minimized alterations to the sloped areas of the site. Where applicable, improvements are "tiered" (or contoured) to conform to existing topography. • The development area is largely located at or near the base of existing sloping topography (along Edmonds Way). In this respect, from a geotechnical standpoint, the most critical landforms consisting of sloping topography and vegetation are preserved. Based on the findings of our study, the development does not increase the need for added buffers on adjacent properties. ► Retaining walls that minimize disturbance to natural slope areas are utilized instead of graded artificial slopes. • The development does utilize an infiltration facility. In this respect, impervious lot coverage is effectively minimized. Earth Solutions NW, LLC t GRE Edmonds Way, LLC October 10, 2011 ES -2039.02 Page 4 We trust this addendum report meets your current needs. Should you require additional information, or have questions, please call. Sincerely, EARTH SOLUTIONS NW, .LLC. l0 110 k Raymond A. Coglas, P.E.»-a Principal Cc: Studio Meng Strazzara` Attn. Mr. Chris Davidson — Email Only Earth Solutions NW, LLC D.F C D 11 +° SPECIAL INSPECTION AND TESTING AGREEMENT Ci v' Pern>tit Project: fat. I'g9a ,Prior to issuance of a perinit, this form must be completed in its entirety and returned to the City for approval. The completed for•rn must have signatures of acknowledgment by all parties. DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES Special Inspection Firm and Special Inspectors: The Special Inspection firm of �%� _L p will perform special inspection for the following types of work (separate forms ust be submitted if more than one firm is to be employed): ❑ Reinforced Concrete ❑ Bolting in Concrete ❑ Prestressed Concrete ❑ Shoterete ❑ Structural Masonry ❑ Structural Steel/Welding ❑ High Strength Bolting ❑ Spray applied Fireproofing ❑ Smoke Control Systems ❑ Lateral Wood ❑ Structural Observation OCT 2 5 2011 BUGDN, Y OF GDMODS ❑ Grading/soils f� Other �u��d�l.o E�to�DCarN ❑ Other All individual inspectors to be employed on this project will be WABO certified for the type of work they are to inspect, If inspection is for work that is not covered by the WABO categories, or the inspector is not WABO certified, a detailed resume of the inspector and firm must be submitted. The resume must show that the inspector and the firm are qualified by education and experience to perform the work and testing required by the project design and specifications. The work shall be inspected for conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the City. Revisions and addenda sheets will not be used for inspection, unless they have been approved by the City. Inspection records shall include: • A daily record to be maintained on site, itemizing the inspections performed. Any nonconforming work shall be brought to the immediate attention of the contractor for resolution. • A weeldy report shall be submitted to the City; detailing the inspections and testing performed, listing any nonconforming work and resolution of nonconforming items. • A final report shall be submitted to the building department prior to the Certificate of occupancy being issued. This report will indicate that inspection and testing was completed in conformance with the approved plans, specifications and approved revisions or addenda, Any unresolved discrepancies must be detailed in the final report. LABuiidino New Folder 20lO\Eorms\Specinl inspection forn.doc10125 /2 01 0 0-py Contractor: The contractor shall provide the special inspector or agency adequate notification of work requiring inspection. The City approved plan and specifications must be made available, at the jobsite for the use of the special inspector and the City inspector. The contractor shall maintain all daily inspection reports, on site, for review by. all parties. The special inspection functions are considered to be in addition to the normal inspections performed by the City and the contractor is responsible for contacting the City to schedule regular inspections. No concrete shall be poured or other work covered until approval is given by the City inspector. Building Department: The building department shall review any revisions and addenda. The City inspector will monitor the special inspection functions for compliance with the agreement and the approved plans. The City inspector shall be. responsible for approving various stages of construction to be covered and for work to proceed. Design Professionals: The architect and/or engineer will clearly indicate on the plans and specifications the specific types of special inspection required. and shall include a schedule for inspection and testing. The architect and/or engineer will coordinate their revision and addenda process in such a way as to insure that all required City approvals are obtained, prior to work shown on the revisions being performed in the field. Owner: The project owner, or the architect or engineer acting as the owners agent, shall employ the special inspector or agency. ENFORCEi4)ENT A failure of the special inspector or firm to perform in keeping with the requiremenis of the IBC, the approved plans and this document, may void this agreement and the Building Official's approval of the special inspector. Da such a case a new special inspector and/or firm would need to be proposed for approval. A failure of the design ancilor construction parties to perform in accordance with this agreement may result in a STOP WORK notice being posted on the project until nonconforming items have been resolved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I have read and agree to comply with the terms and conditions of this agreement. l' Owner: �c S �> �-L�- Signature {`�Qk-,-,,✓ Date Contractor: Date: Date: �q Date: to ! ACCEPTED FOR THE CITY OF EDMONDS BUILDING DEPT. By: (il / Date: LABuilding New Folder 2010\Forms\Speciai inspection form.docl0/25/2010 2476 Westlake Ave N #102 Seattle, WA 98109 Tel: 206 283 0066 info@cross2dg.comgo www.cross2dg.com CROSS 2 DESIGN GROUP April 11, 2012 Leonard Yarberry, Building Official City of Edmonds Building Division City Hall 1215 th Ave. North — 2nd Floor Edmonds, WA 98020 Re: Edmonds Way Apartments — North Building Edmonds Way and 232nd Street, Edmonds, WA 98026 RCW 64.55 Building Envelope Certification Dear Mr. Yarberry, Cross 2 Design Group (C2DG), is providing the following brief information related to the services we have provided to date on the above referenced project. During construction, C2DG made periodic site visits to observe representative samples of the installed work related to the documents which include details, plans and specifications that had been developed for the project. The building envelope design documents address the following areas of the building — exterior walls, roofs, covered stairways, and penetrations. This letter certifies that in our opinion the work has been performed in substantial compliance with the building envelope construction documents and in accordance with RCW 64.55. Our opinion is based on our periodic observations of the representative samples of work during the construction phase and our final site visit and review at the completion of construction. Please contact me if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, Brad Minogue, AIA, LEED Tm A.P. �o Senior Architect RECEIVED Cc: Bruce Moe, Venture General Contracting, LLC APR 17 2012 Jeb Hardan, Studio Meng Strazzara DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Hansen Surveying 17701 108th Ave. SE PMB 208 Renton, WA 98.055 (425)235-8440 Fax (425) 235-0266* March 7, 2012 Venture General Contracting Attn: Mr. Bruce Moe 2801 Alaska Way Suite 310 Seattle, WA 98121 RE: Edmonds Way Apartments, 23014 Edmonds Way, Edmonds, WA 98026 Dear Mr. Moe: On December 5, 2011 our field crew took field survey measurements to ascertain the as -built elevation of the top of the structure of the North Building at the Edmonds Way Apartments project. The top of the structure elevation was measured to be 390.0 feet. The maximum allowed building height per City Code for the North Building is 390.05'.. On February 14, 2012 our field crew took field survey measurements to ascertain the as -built elevation of the top of the structure for the South Building at the Edmonds Way Apartments project. The results of those field measurements are as follows: As -built top of parapet elevation: 411.55 feet. Maximum top of parapet elevation allowed per plan: 411.64 feet. The as -built elevations were derived using the two bench marks — TBM#1 & TBM#2 - listed on the Cover Sheet - C101 of the "City of Edmonds, Edmonds Way Apartments, 23014 Edmonds Way", civil construction plans dated July 14, 2011 — NAVD88 Datum. On February 14, 2012 our field crew took field survey measurements to ascertain the as -built locations of the foundations for the North Building and South Building. The foundations and finished floors for both buildings were found to be within an inch of their respective design locations for horizontal placement relative to the property lines and finished floor elevation as shown on the approved construction plans. Both the North -Building and South Building are constructed within the property boundaries. Please call or email with any questions. Sincerely, Rodney G. Hansen, P.L.S.