BLD20130698_CANOD.pdfCity of Edmonds
Critical Area Notice of Decisiol
Applicant:
Y�k
Property Owner:
Critical Area File
S
Permit Number:
C)
Site Location:
Parcel Number:
'K 'X�
Project Description:
Ej"'-Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
There will be no, alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer.
2. _4ZL' The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23,40,220, 23.50.220, and/or
23,80.040.
I The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
E] Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required, A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40,160:
I The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
on or off the development proposal site;
3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40.110, Mitigation requirements,
The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23,40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23,40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above, See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
,e
Reviewer Sinature Date
Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the
requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 12/16/2010
f i
r
E a
4
_+ ....,.»...., ._..._
pp
b
h•
t _
7
r i• p
VIN 1'1` i a� �, c i rC
reAI`� p is
�"A Y " ^,!� v:.. F
u
�powl
�
o�
R
&P � 1,�"�
62 IV P
a
w � � � � t
in
T, t1l
Michael and Monika Reis
7, a pix u
1 �p
525 Magnolia Lane �
Edmonds, Washington 98020-3419 'Tax account Parcel No. 27032500203800
LOT COVE GE (T of Area 5,999.8 s.f) LOT SLOPE: 15�q� Corner r f
�,7it
Existin : �Posed:�°
2,795.6 s.f 2795.4 s.f� ' Act
46.6% 46.6%
BUILDING T IGH CALCULATION: �d���
A�=+146.3 Average de �-�-148.4�i ������� �,�.�...� � .�..�...
E = x-150.2 tactual BldgPIt. _ +162.3 �
C" = +150.7' Max.Bldg Ht = +173 4'°..,,,k. ,..,,.,�.,..,,,. ..... .......... . �,...�....�..
D = +146.5'
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATIONS (Existing Building Constructed in 1953)
Existing hoof Surface: 2,902.9 s.f RECEIVED
Existing Paved areas: 840.3
Total Existing Impervious Surfaces: 3,743.3 s.f JUN 28 2013
Existing Impervious Lot Coverage: 62.39%
Proposed.Roof Surface (New _e_ Exist.): 2,979.9 s.f CA r( OFDMO14D �
Proposed Paved areas (Now + Exist.): 722.3 s.f,,(118 s.f of exist. to be removed)
Total Proposed Impervious Surfaces: 3702.2 s.f.
Proposed Impervious Lot Coverage: 61.71% Page ��o 4,