bld20130931_Dedon-3.docx
City of Edmonds
TH
121 5 AVENUE NORTH • EDMONDS, WA 98020 • (425) 771-0220 FAX(425) 771-0221
Website: www.ci.edmonds.wa.us
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Engineering Division
Plan Review Corrections (3)
Plan Check : Date:
# BLD20130931 October 24, 2013
nd
Project Name/Address:
Dedonker New Single Family Residence 411 2 Ave N
Contact Person/Address/Fax:
Mike @ BDZ Construction mikebdz@gmail.com
Reviewer: JoAnne ZulaufDivision:Engineering
During review of the subject submittal, it was found that the following information, corrections, or
clarifications would need to be addressed. All Handouts and Standard Details referred to in these
comments can be accessed at our website: www.edmondswa.gov by choosing the Government tab and
Public Works| Engineering under Departments:
General Plan:
1. 10/24/13 Not Done. Especially the Drainage/Utility plan. 10/10/13 Not done. For clarity,
the City of Edmonds requires 3 drawings for review; a plot plan (site plan), a grading/tesc
plan (demo info can be included on this plan) and a stormwater/utility plan. Please review
the requirements for each plan in the handout B#73 New Single Family Residence,
sections 4, 5, and 6. Attached is an example of a site plan, a drainage plan, and a
temporary erosion sediment control (tesc)and grading plan for reference, though specific
information necessary may vary per project. The drawings that have been resubmitted are
far less clear than the originally submitted plans. It is very difficult to read and find
information. Redlining is not recommended with the amount of changes that were
necessary to these plans. Your contractor will need to be able to build from these plans. If
they are confusing, it is more likely there will be delays or other problems during
construction. I would strongly recommend that the plans be revised electronically.
2. Done.
3. Not Done. If you choose to continue to redline the plans, please consider using a larger
sheet size. Be sure to enlarge so that the scale will still be correct.
4. Not Done Please remove the note “Downspouts to Drain to Tightline…” from plans.
5. Not Done Please remove “Erosion Control See Plan” as there is not erosion control
shown on all plans and there is not a specific erosion control plan.
6. Not Done It is not clear what the “proposed building area” refers to. If it was meant to be
lot coverage then the numbers would not be the same as the impervious surface
calculations. See planning comments for more information.
DATE FAXED/E-MAILED 7/2/2017 PAGE ___ OF __
12
Plan 2: Stormwater/Utility Plan:
Stormwater: Please see the example plan provided.
1. Done
Done
2.
3. Done
4. Done
5. N/A
6. Done
7. Done
8. Done
9. Done.
10. Done.
11. Done.
12. Done.
13. 10/24/13 The outfall storm line is shown passing over/under/through the water meter. An 8”
pipe and a water meter box will not be able to be installed that close together. Please provide
a catch basin or clean out for the storm line to connect to located perpendicularly at the
property line and then a perpendicular connection to the existing storm catch basin in the road.
All private storm lines (footing drain lines and the outfall from the detention system) should be
combined on private property and only one connection should be made to the existing catch
basin.
Additional Comment:
10/24/13 It appears that Planning has provided comments regarding Lot Coverage. When making
changes to reduce lot coverage, please update the impervious surface calculations to reflect the final
measurements.
Please resubmit 3 copies of the revised plans/documents to a Development Services Coordinator. Please
contact me at 425-771-0220 if you have specific questions regarding these plan corrections.
DATE FAXED/E-MAILED 7/2/2017 PAGE ___ OF __
22