Loading...
BLD20140454_1.PDFa CITY OF EDMONDS 121 5TH A VENUE NORTH - EDMONDS, WA 98020 PHONE: (425) 771-0220 - FAX: (425) 771-0221 �. 1s STATUS: ISSUED 07/08/2014 Expiration Date: 01/08/2015 Parcel No: 27031300101700 Permi -VIEW DR, EDMONDS MENRIT Y & ELSHARAWY KASS FRANCIS MENRIT Y & ELSHARAWY KASS MENRIT Y & ELSHARAWY KASS FRANCIS 9231 OLYMPIC VIEW DR FRANCIS 9231 OLYMPIC VIEW DR EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396 9231 OLYMPIC VIEW DR EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396 EDMONDS, WA 98020-2396 (206)423-8834 (206)423-8834 (206)423-8834 LICENSE #: EXP MODULAR BLOCK RETAINING WALL. WALL HEIGHT NOT TO EXCEED 36" ABOVE ORIGINAL GRADE. VALUATION: $0.00 PERMIT TYPE: Residential PERMIT GROUP: 58 - Retaining Wall/Bulkhead GRADING: N CYDS 0 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: RETAINING WALL ROCKERY: OCCUPANT GROUP: OCCUPANT LOAD: FENCE: ( 0 X 0 FT.) CODE: 12 t OTHER: ------- OTHER DESC: ZONE: RS-12 NUMBER OF STORIES: 0 VESTED DATE: NUMBER OF DWELLING UNITS: 0 LOT #. BASEMENT: 0 1ST FLOOR: 0 2ND FLOOR: 0 BASEMENT IST FLOOR. 0 2ND FLOOR. 0 3RD FLOOR: 0 GARAGE. 0 DECK: 0 OTHER: 0 13RD FLOOR 0 GARAGE: 0 DECK: 0 OTHER 0 BEDROOMS: 0 BATHROOMS, 0 IBEDROOMS: 0 BATHROOMS 0 :SQUIRED See Below PROPOSED: IREQUIRED PROPOSED IREQUIRED: PROPOSED: (EIGHT ALLOWED:3 PROPOSED:3 IREQUIRED, PROPOSED: IETBACK NOTES No,change proposed to existing setbacks. The retaining walls shall not exceed 3 feet in height over original grade since located withn he minimum required setback areas. I AGREE TO COMPLY WITH CITY AND STATE LAWS REGULATING CONSTRUCTION AND IN DOING THE WORK AUTHORIZED THEREBY, NO PERSON WILL BE EMPLOYED IN VIOLATION OF T'HF. LABOR CODE OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON RELATING TO WORKMEN'SCOMPENSATION INSURANCE AND RCW 18:27. PHIS APPLICATION IS NOT A PERMIT UNTIL SIGNED BY THE BUILDING OFFICIAL OR HISMHER DEPUTY AND ALL FEES ARE PAID me ed By ATTENTION IT IS UNLAWFUL TO USE OR OCCUPY A BUILDING OR STRUCTURE UNTIL A FINAL INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE AND APPROVAL OR A C'ERTIFIC'ATE. OF OCCUPANCY HAS BEEN GRANTED. UBC109/ IBC 10/ IRC110. ONLINE APPLICANT = ASSESSOR OTHER+1` t STATUS: ISSUED BLD20140454 • All work shall be entirely on the private property owned by Mr. El Sharawy. • Final approval on a project or final occupancy approval must be granted by the Building Official prior to use or occupancy of the building or structure. Check the job card for all required City inspections including final project approval and final occupancy inspections. • Any request foralternate design, modification, variance or other administrative deviation (hereinafter "variance") from adopted codes, ordinances orpolicies must be specifically requested in writing and be called out and identified. Processing fees for such request shall be established by Council and shall be paid upon submittal and are non-refundable. • Approval of any plat or plan containing provisions which do not comply with city code and for which a variance has not been specifically identified, requested and considered by the appropriate city official in accordance with the appropriate provision of city code or state law does not approve any items not to code specification. • Sound/Noise originating ffomtemporary construction sites as a result of construction activity are exempt from the noise limits of ECC Chapter 5.30 only during the hours of 7:00am to 6:00pm on weekdays and 10:00am and 6:00pm on Saturdays, excluding Sundays and Federal Holidays. At all other times the noise originating from construction sites/activities must comply with the noise limits of Chapter 5.30, unless a variance has been granted pursuant to ECC 5.30.120. • Applicant, on behalf of his or her spouse, heirs, assigns, and successors in interests, agrees to indemnify defend and hold harmless the City of Edmonds, Washington, its officials, employees, and agents from any and all claims for damages of whatever nature, arising directly or indirectly from the issuance for this permit. Issuance of this permit shall not be deemed to modify, waive or reduce any requirements of any City ordinance nor limit in any way the City's ability to enforce any ordinance provision. • Nothing in this permit approval process shall be interpreted as allowing or permitting the maintenance of any currently existing illegal, nonconforming or unpermitted building, structure or site condition which is outside the scope of the permit application, regardless of whether such building, structure or condition is shown on the site plan or drawing. Such building, structure or condition maybe the subject ofa separate enforcement action. THIS PERMIT AUTHORIZES ONLY THE WORK NOTED. THIS PERMIT COVERS WORK TO BE DONE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY ONLY. ANY CONSTRUCTION ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN (CURBS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, MARQUEES, ETC.) WILL REQUIRE SEPARATE PERMISSION. PERMIT TIME LIMIT: SEE ECDC 19.00.005(A)(6) BUILDING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1333 1 ENGINEERING (425) 771-0220 EXT. 1326 1 FIRE (425) 775-7720 PUBLIC WORKS 425 771-0235 1 PR&TRFATNM*4T 425 672-5755 1 RECYCLING 425 275-4801 When calling for an inspection please lease the following information: Permit Number, Job Site Address, Type of Inspection being requested. Contact Name and Phone Number. Date Prefereed and whether you urefer morning or afternoon. • B-Building Final City of Edmonds CITY COPY Critical Area Notice of Decision Applicant: Property Owner: El Critical Area File #: Permit Number: W$' BLZ201gO Site Location: Parcel Number: 2-1 03x3owo l-400 9.131 Project Description: Aide— ot V ❑ Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above. 1. There will be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer. 2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or 23.80.040. 3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230. Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30. Critical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160: AQ n",,} swb,,+eJ le:Ver da�cd 'Vi lv b'y Gee" C M5'J*Wk X"t. 1. The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120, Mitigation sequencing; 2. ✓/ The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare on or off the development proposal site; 3. ✓/ The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest; 4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC 23.40.110, Mitigation requirements. 5. /The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best vailable science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and 6. The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards. ❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of noncompliance. Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal. ❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s). Reviewer /Oie Date Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any, for the permit or approval involved. Revised 1211612010 0231 1 0 Viiew 0 a= , r� 9Ls� V,Hr tv Man no Scale' RECEIVED MAY 12 2014 UEVELOPMEW SERVICES CTR. r,,Ty OF EDMONDS Ak1 �o�k S�,.si1 lot.c�/ ow•.eJ by Mr. El S4.as+AZ7 Modular block retaining wad . KG less [hart 36" height Site Plan scaw 1"-20R Description of Work retaining wall less [hart 3'-0' in setback PlanningfEngineering Dept Into. - Address: 9231 Olymplo View Drive. ' Tax Aoct No. Z7031300101700 (main Muse) Tax A=ccL No. 27031300703100 t,%6 ,[GGAL DESC2fTItl)) Critical Areas it Applied for Zoning RS-12 - Use: SFR Lot Area (M-) 37AU.75 —� �uZ tit! bF: —top `4 t . 2p� kANANG s �e a'99 tag e 'o e� • tom' 'vP60 Xo ote�tlY by'�a' ape 'os ., ram' e the e= %*Oa e � w gOT f ji�8; �� 01.ee�4 ° ww S�i�'b��l - a �v h rv� NIA 01C b Zone- Corner Fla&— etba ks gg!! fired Actual Front v Sides �6s- Rear Other Heights 1 r►� rC.� a:n � � cJzi is 9�v, no'1' e,x ce-eci 3� : r+ �n t•�I►' o� tr o �� ^� fVh:n i e►�K/'►1 iC.� Ni r� 9GTao�C.� 1rt a . Page A-1 w OEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. RECEIVED 13256 Northeast 20th Street, Suite 16 Bellevue, Washing on 98005 MAY 12 2014 (425) 747-5618 FAX (425) 747-8561 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES CTR. CITY OF EDMONDS Eddie El Sharaway c/o Seaview Business Development 8818 — 205d' Place Southwest Edmonds, Washington 98026 Attention: Steve Gray Subject: Landslide and Erosion Hazard Assessment Modular Block Walls El Sharaway Residence 9231 Olympic View Drive Edmonds, Washington Dear Mr. Gray: May 9, 2014 JN 14062 via email sc3gray@yahoo.com This letter presents our geotechnical observations and conclusions regarding the landslide and erosion hazards on the property in relation to the modular walls that were constructed on the east side of the lot in 2009. In order to prepare this letter, we have visited the site on two separate occasions. This has allowed us to observe the existing conditions in the areas of both the eastern modular walls and the critical areas. A short rockery existed through the central portion of the eastern property line prior to the 2009 construction of the modular walls. It is obvious that this rockery is older than the modular walls, and was likely constructed at least as long ago as the residence itself. This rockery appears to retain some fill. To the south of the rockery, two short modular walls were built in 2009 to create more level space alongside the driveway. These walls have an exposed height of approximately 3 feet each, and they are set back 3 to 4 feet from each other. We understand that the modular walls were constructed in front of an old short rockery that was pre-existing at this location. At the time of our first visit in February 2014, there were pavers located behind the old rockery in the central portion of the eastern property line. This allowed the potential for vehicles to be parked close to, and create a surcharge on, the rockery. At the time of our May 7, 2014 visit, we observed that the pavers had been removed, and the area within at least 8 feet of the backside of the rockery had been covered with landscape bark. Also, a short fence had been erected along the driveway. These measures will prevent the area behind the old rockery from being used as parking. There is a hedge alongside the driveway through the area of the modular walls, preventing vehicles from driving off the driveway -to park on the area behind the modular walls. Based on our observations, neither the pre-existing rockery nor the modular block walls can be subjected to surcharges from vehicles getting close to them. The eastern portion of the property that is occupied by the residence, yard, driveway, and eastern walls slopes gently toward the northeast. On the western portion of the lot there is a tall, very steep bluff extending down to the BNSF railroad tracks that were installed alongside the Puget Sound. This bluff continues to the north and south for quite a distance. Due to the Inclination of the bluff it would definitely meet the City of Edmond's criteria for both a landslide and erosion hazard area. This bluff is prone to periodic landslides that are most often naturally occurring "skin" slides that GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. El Shara way JN 14062 May 9, 2014 Page 2 affect the near -surface few feet of soil that loosens over time due to weathering. These slides typically occur during periods of heavy rainfall, and result in mudflows that can, at times, reach the BNSF tracks. The risk of this type of slope movement exists for all of the nearby lots. The eastern modular walls are located on the opposite side of the residence from the steep bluff. They are over 100 feet from the crest of the bluff. Work associated with the walls did not disturb the bluff itself, or the area within at least 100 feet of the bluff. Considering the extensive distance from the bluff, and the very limited fill that was placed behind the modular walls, they in no way decreased the stability of the bluff. Additionally, because the bluff and the area behind it were not disturbed by the construction of the walls, they have not increased the potential for soil erosion on the bluff. In our professional opinion, the minimum 100-foot buffer maintained between the modular walls and the steep bluff was sufficient to prevent adverse impacts to the critical area on the site or the surrounding lots. The walls have not increased the amount of surface water or sediment being discharged to surrounding lots. In fact, the placement of vegetation and gravel on the ground behind the modular walls has decreased the potential for erosion and sediment transport for any surface runoff that would naturally travel toward the northeast with the slope of the ground. Please contact us if you have any questions, or if we can be of further service. MRM: at Respectfully submitted, GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. Marc R. McGinnis, P.E. Principal GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. EXEMPTION FROM CONTRACTOR REGISTRATION VERIFICATION FORM D The undersigned property owner or authorized person as described below, has applied for a building permit from the City of Edmonds . and claims that he/she/it is exempt from providing contractor registration in accordance with the provisions of RCW 18.27. The property owner or authorized person, by their signature below, hereby verifies to the City of Edmonds that: ❑ Value of work under $500.00. The aggregate contract price of labor and materials and all other items required for the project is less than $500.00 and is not part of a larger operation to be undertaken on the property. This exemption does not apply to a person who advertises or puts out any sign or card or other device which might indicate to the public that he/she is a contractor, or that he/she is qualified to. engage in the business of contractor. RCW 18.27.090(9). ❑ Owner who contracts for a project. A property owner contracting with registered contractors for the project, and who him/herself is not performing any activity of a contractor for the purpose of leasing or selling improved property that he/she has owned for less than twelve months. RCW 18.27.090(11). [�- 4�Vork performed personally on own. property. Anyone personally working on property he/she owns, or at which he/she resides, as long as the property owner, or resident, does not perform any activity of a contractor on his/her property for the purpose of selling, demolishing, or leasing the property. RCW 18.27.090(12). ❑ Use of own employees. Property. owner using him/herself or his/her own employees to perform maintenance, repair, and. alteration work in or upon his/her own property. RCW 18.27.090(13). ❑ Licensed Architect, engineer, electrician or plumber. All work performed under this permit will be performed by an architect, civil or professional engineer, certified electrician or certified plumber operating within the scope of his/her certification. RCW 18.72.090(14). ❑ Other. Specify which provision of RCW 18.27.090 applies: THE UNDERSIGNED PROPERTY OWNER OR AUTHORIZED PERSON HEREBY VERIFIES THAT ALL INFORMATION PROVIDED- ON THIS FORM IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF HIS OR HER KNOWLEDGE AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT -0IF ANY OF THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS FORM IS FALSE HE OR SHE UNDERSTANDS THAT THE BUILDING PERMIT WILL BE DAWDIATELY REVOKED AND ALL FEES PAID FORFEITED. � I�I DATED this �� day of�J-L) , 20_� PROPERTY OWNER/AUTHORIZED PERSON Prinf Name WITNESS L:\TEMP\BUILDING\HANDOUTS REVISED IN 2009\PREVIOUS HANDOUTS\FORMS\CONTRACTOR EXEMPTION FORM D.DOCREVISED 7/07