BLD20151484-1485_CANOD.pdf. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer.
sal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or
sal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
•oject is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
n in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
[9,T—ritical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A ciitical area report has been submitted awtd evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
1. t,/"'The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. ✓TJie proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
on, or oif the developtriont^ proposal site;
3. ✓ The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40.110, Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
6. ✓ The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
[Favorable Critical Area, Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations.Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
L y
V _ S attire
Date
he
requirements of critical arearegulationsmay be appealed according
t proposal or other" activity based on e
Appeals: An decision to approve, condition, or deny a development
din8 to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, df any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 12/16/2010
1.
2.
3.
. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
be no alteration of a Critical Area or its required buffer.
sal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or
sal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
•oject is within erosion hazard area. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
n in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
[9,T—ritical Area Report Required. The proposed project is within a critical area and/or a critical area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A ciitical area report has been submitted awtd evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
1. t,/"'The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. ✓TJie proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
on, or oif the developtriont^ proposal site;
3. ✓ The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40.110, Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
6. ✓ The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
[Favorable Critical Area, Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations.Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
L y
V _ S attire
Date
he
requirements of critical arearegulationsmay be appealed according
t proposal or other" activity based on e
Appeals: An decision to approve, condition, or deny a development
din8 to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, df any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 12/16/2010
OZOIRIS NOI!DNIHSVM '!S(INOVY(13 sa
N 8nN3AV H -L9 OL9
011 '83VYOH vyo.LsnO N3S3nHI 0I143
it
<
1W
T
t tLI IL 6m
LL,
T... ...... ..
rr
J T t L
e4
a Fr
HOE
LLJ
zw j)
r —41
DAV/
A�
E Ai iv
j p � ; � ", � -, i �. , 4 , I M
�t ln
tw
14,
A
5, $
pj
PiT gg
Hs
4m
a
62 jHb, 1p�oPyq e 1, m
w 6
.6-
�4 -
gvq
pin�p
2 t3 6
mu
2 �q,
w A,�
M.
oi
R
VR H H