CANOD.pdfCity of Edmonds
Critical Area Notice of Decision
❑ Conditional Waiver. No critical area report is required for the project described above.
1. There will be no alteration of a -Critical Area or its required buffer.
2. The proposal is an allowed activity pursuant to ECDC 23.40.220, 23.50.220, and/or
23.80.040.
3. The proposal is exempt pursuant to ECDC 23.40.230.
❑ Erosion Hazard. Project is within erosion hazard area.. Applicant must prepare an erosion and
sediment control plan in compliance with ECDC 18.30.
Critical Area Report Required'. The proposed project is within acritical area and/or a critical, area
buffer and a critical area report is required. A critical area report has been submitted and evaluated
for compliance with the following criteria pursuant to ECDC 23.40.160:
1. _� The proposal minimizes the impact on critical areas in accordance with ECDC 23.40.120,
Mitigation sequencing;
2. The proposal does not pose an unreasonable threat to the public health, safety, or welfare
T" on of off the development proposal site;
3. The proposal is consistent with the general purposes of this title and the public interest;
4. / Any alterations permitted to the critical area are mitigated in accordance with ECDC
23.40.110, Mitigation requirements.
5. The proposal protects the critical area functions and values consistent with the best
available science and results in no net loss of critical functions and values; and
6. / The proposal is consistent with other applicable regulations and standards.
❑ Unfavorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project is not exempt or does not adequately
mitigate its impacts on critical areas and/or does not comply with the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160 and
the provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. See attached findings of
noncompliance.
Favorable Critical Area Decision. The proposed project as described above and as shown on the
attached site plan meets or is exempt from the criteria in ECDC 23.40.160, Review Criteria, and
complies with the applicable provisions of the City of Edmonds critical area regulations. Any
subsequent changes to the proposal shall void this decision pending re -review of the proposal.
❑ Conditions. Critical Area specific condition(s) have been applied to the permit number referenced
above. See referenced permit number for specific condition(s).
M-C1U,5S-do-
Reviewer
,14
Vp
S igna re
Date
Appeals: Any decision to approve, condition, or deny a development proposal or other activity based on the
requirements of critical area regulations may be appealed according to, and as part of, the appeal procedure, if any,
for the permit or approval involved.
Revised 12/16/2010
'� r �' r� � ✓I 'v, .Z (t h
e%eci-inicc7l En
gine,erinp cyncf Ecirth Sciences,
April 25, 2014
Mr. Greg Jacobsen `��, ..
c% Krannitz Gehl Architects
765 NE Northlake Way
Seattle, WA 98105
SUBJECT: SUPPLEMENTAL EVALUATIONS
Proposed West "yard Grading and Hot Tub
741 Hanna Park Road
Edmonds, Washington
Project No. 13-133-01
Dear Greg,
AUG 13 2015
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
COUNTER
In accordance with a request from Bryan Irannitz, this is to confirm our evaluations and
recommendations regarding the subject minor west yard grading and siting of the
Proposed hot tub as shown on the attached Figures 1 and 2. We have previously
prepared' a geotechnical evaluation report dated December 4, 2013 for your new
residence.
SUPPLEMENTAL EVALUATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The existing bluff slope that borders the west side of the site is considered to be a
Landslide Hazard Area based upon its height and very steep inclination per the criteria
presented in 23.80.020 B of the Edmonds code.
Based upon our previous site observations and shallow explorations and revieof
geologic map, the bluff is composed of very dense/hard gdr . • soils.
Our previous observations of the existing bluff slope
slope revealed no evidence of deep seated
slope on the site or on the
adjacent properties, wr - •observe evidence �, w
P. ®. BOX 276, Issciq+ucrh, WA 98627-0276 - Phone. (425) 39 ..,391-4228.�
�-�228 Fox., 42�
Jacobsen
CLOSURE
April 25, 2014
This letter was prepared with the skill and care ordinarily exercised by local members of
the geotechnical profession practicing under similar, conditions in the same locality.
We make no other warranty, either express or implied,
Variations may exist in site conditions between those described in our previous report
and actual conditions encountered during construction. Unanticipated subsurface
conditions commonly occur and cannot be prevented by performing reconnaissance or
explorations. Such unexpected conditions frequently require additional expenditures to
achieve a properly constructed project. If conditions encountered during, construction
appear to be different from those indicated in our previous report, our office should be
notified.
Sincerely,
GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
James A. Doolittle
Principal Engineer
Attachment: Figures 1 and 2
dist: 1 /Addressee
Project No. 13-133-01
Page 3
COMBINED STEEP SLOPE BUFFER
AND BUILDING SETBACK PER GEOTECH
r REPORT
30'0'" — ORDINARY SETBACK
MAX EAVE PROJECTION INTO
STRUCTURE SETBACK
30" EAVE EXCLU61ON FROM
HEIGHT RECTANGLE -.
EX15TING LANDSCAPING
• 5HRllBBER�'
a �w*
PT B EXISTINGREBwENCE
(TO 159 DEMOLICHED)
4,3.97—�.. 44.7V, N
„
fi r" d ✓ 0 " `y -. y AUTO COu
M W ✓' v'W
r� r
KTIAL�
wo
AT &RADE I ► ,� R
tlq
TRRACIE dP r ✓ a rr°fy"� t'
»� IIUTTUB ��
e TuAiGRADFb s -
�r, "
m x
Hot Tub
ck
r
w� ATER EATURI
119\C ER•' .
p
'i
40(
i
rUTILI
4 r y
le,
PT 0
449
ad v .
JUN(
p \ ✓.° "� � LOCK
17 aJ 16'-�Ar W 1 MAN
FT.0
Pi, DI 43.9
42.88' ,
AVER
F"h C MEA+
I 42,66' REC9
-ADJACENT PROPERTY
40 STRUCTURE FOOTPRINT
BUILDING SETBACK
vKa rtnrcrN acvnar
ref: Portion of Site Plan transmitted 4/22/14,
by Krannitz Gehl Architects
Proposed Hot Tub Buffer + Setback
Proposed Residence Replacement
EOSPECTRUM OONSUC ANTS" INC. 741 Hanna Park Road
" f •Edmonds, Washington
+aaca��.J°rnN�r�( En�/na®Nn8 and ,'r�rr^,Cta S'cr/amn��rap
Proj. No13-133 I Date 4/14 Figure 2
Proposed. Grading Area:
ref: Partial Site Plan transmitted 4/22/14,
by Krannitz Gehl Architects
GEOSPECTRUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
+r,��+�^/-rn/s:w/ Ens/nasi/n® and Eorfh �,�rny,
(13OUNDARY CALCDiINN w
Proposed West Yard Grading
Proposed. Residence Replacement
741 Hanna, Pare Road
Edmonds,.Washington
Proj. No13-133 1 Date 4/14 Figure 1
w