Civil Review 2 - Tree Cutting Plan recd 2-22-19.pdfTREE CUTTING PLAN-1
� II
OWNER: 4,R ffi
APN.:O EDECKE
A t01500
1'23;[E_285------
JJJ J
J
J�JJ A
j \ POWER \ fFIR \
J J PLO METER \IR
JJJ h') — — ---- \
� JJJJJJJJJIJ �
J JJJJJ 1
WATER J JJJJJ JJ / o
METER LL13J JJJJJJJJJ Q
SPLIT -RAIL J
W ENCE J J J J J �• \ �� o°
EXISTING HOUSE o N
Q a Lo �1 STAI S (18227 80TH AVE W \ 24"
v 18 55 SQ. FT.± (GR SS) EDMONDS, WA 98026) _°
j _ 4„E 1 ,421 SQ. FT.± ) \
_ \I
� Q 37.00_ o \' �' \
>
COD a 2 „FI \ o o /
Q
8"CED
GAS \ adl
v \
METER • : I
n ° �\ j
r o N G
J JJJ JJJJ
JJ\ �
JJJJJJ d
JJJ
4JJJJJJJJJJ
JJ JJJJJ
un
JJJJJJ
N\ I
I
LJJJJJ
JJJJJ
JJJJJ
�I
J JJ J
J J�J�
SD
� F\IR
�W\12h€S o 16"H
.II I L
T7//7J//�T/T�/ X l OWN R: ARMAUNI BARSAMIAN
---� I i TT///7T/
- -- --- ----. / APN.:00370800101300
SS
5'
\ 12' L\ 2 "MA
\ 8° ALD
„AL ° \ v \ \ MAP O�oo
U lJ �U 1 12 L o
O O z
\ 2"&
AL 10 'A o
\ cno
� zo
L L O n 4 "A D � o
\ o 1 A �o Lo
18,636 SO. FT.± (GROSS - - J N
18,636 FT. ± ( 0"M P < o
0
\8"M P 1 "ALD o z Q
15.0'
\ SLOPE BUFF R
B.S.B.L.
~ �1 D \
\8 EM \ \
_
20.0'
SLOPE BUFFER
/z/
P057 10'-O" F057
T
\ORANGE FENCE
2'"'x5" CEDAR
TRIM PIECE
012 x 5" FLT. HD,
SCREWS
METAL NIRINC ATTACHED TO
METAL F05T HOULD BE
SUFFICIENT ALTERNATIVE
DE7AIL
_AROEMENT
EXT'O GRADE
COMPACTED OR
EX15TINO 5UB6RADE
EXISTING VEGETATION LEGEND
EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE
RETAINED
EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO BE
RETAINED
EXISTING CLUSTER OF DECIDUOUS
� TREES TO BE RETAINED
BOUNDARY FOR PROPOSED NATIVE
VEGETATION MANAGEMENT AREA
TREE PROTECTION FENCING. SEE
DETAIL THIS SHEET
TREE RETENTION
NO EXISTING TREES ARE PROPOSED TO BE
REMOVED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. IN
ADDITION, IT IS EXPECTED THAT NO OFFSITE
TREES WILL BE IMPACTED BY THE PROJECT.
ANY TREE CUTTING PROPOSED ON THE SITE
THAT IS NOT A HAZARDOUS SITUATION AND/OR
NOT NECESSARY AS PART OF THE SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AT THE
TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION OR
THROUGH THE APPROPRIATE LAND USE PERMIT
APPLICATION AND REVIEW PROCESS. ALL TREES
THAT ARE TO BE RETAINED DURING THE
DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND TREES LOCATED
ON ADJACENT PROPERTIES MUST BE
PROTECTED ACCORDING TO THE
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOUND IN ECDC
18.45.050(H). IF DURING CONSTRUCTION IT IS
REALIZED THAT CERTAIN TREES THAT WERE
PLANNED TO BE RETAINED WILL BE DAMAGED
DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES,
REPLACEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED PER ECDC
18.45.050(F).
TREE PRESERVATION NOTES
1. THE DRIPLINE OF PROTECTED TREES SHALL BE MARKED PRIOR TO CLEARING AND
GRADING ACTIVITIES.
2. 3" OF COMPOSTED WOODCHIPS SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF ALL
RETAINED TREES.
3. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE PURCHASED IN CONTINUOUS ROLLS AND
CUT TO THE LENGTH OF THE BARRIER TO AVOID USE OF JOINTS. WHEN JOINTS ARE
NECESSARY, FENCING SHALL BE SPLICED TOGETHER ONLY AT A SUPPORT POST
WITH MIN. 6" OVERLAP, AND SECURELY FASTEN BOTH ENDS TO THE POST.
4. THE TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MAINTAINED A MINIMUM
OF 3' BEYOND THE OUTER EDGE OF THE DRIPLINE FOR ALL PROTECTED TREES.
FENCING SHALL COMPLETELY SURROUND THE REQUIRED TREE PROTECTION AREA.
FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE CITY AUTHORIZES THE REMOVAL OR
ISSUES A FINAL CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, WHICHEVER OCCURS FIRST.
5. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ANY LAND
DISTURBANCE ACTIVITIES.
6. NO STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE CRITICAL DRIPLINE IS
ALLOWED. DURING DEVELOPMENT, NO PERSON SHALL ATTACH ANY OBJECT TO ANY
DESIGNATED FOR PROTECTION.
7. REPLACE/REPAIR PROTECTIVE FENCING AS REQUIRED.
8. GRADE SHALL NOT BE FILLED OR CUT WITHIN THE DRIPLINE OF ANY TREE
DESIGNATED TO REMAIN WITHOUT PRIOR REVIEW BY THE CITY'S QUALIFIED TREE
PROTECTION PROFESSIONAL AND ADVANCE, WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE
DIRECTOR.
9. TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PRACTICAL, UTILITY TRENCHES SHALL BE LOCATED
OUTSIDE OF THE ROOT PROTECTION ZONE OF TREES TO BE RETAINED. BORING OR
TUNNELING UNDER THE DRIPLINE MAY BE CONSIDERED AN ALTERNATIVE, BUT SHALL
REQUIRED THE ADVANCE, WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR.
10. TREES AND OTHER VEGETATION TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM
EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION.
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
NOT TO SCALE
c
0
U)
Elf
J
dJ J
Q
W
N
z
0
W
00
0)
w
z
w
a
o
LLJ
w
0
c�
w(r�0
00
>
w
®
0
C1
C\l
w
>
D
0
C00
W
D
m
o
N
N
o
z
z
ri
cf)
w
Lo
:
00
0_w®�'
Q
Lu
Ow~z
IL
Co
O
Q
�
Q�
w
W
C\I
__J
T-
ILL
,of WASH
*f M. VARZ � o
_C
ZA
�o
0
U
Q
N
z
6 N
n o
II
>
>
>
>
>
cv
c
>
E
_Y
z
a
a
0
�2
u
Q
0
=
0 U
�
z >
z �
O
n
z Ld
Q
W
X
J
Q
Q
_
z w
z
W
N N
N
Q
J
z
Qr7
N
O cal
oC
�
n,
z
O
00 Q0
oC
>
w
z
\
Q Ln
Ln
w
Ld
"(_5
z
Lo
Ln
Ln
w w
N
Z N
cal
J �
(in
c�
Z
T,
LW
�Jv
coN
0
TREE INFORMATION SOURCE: LANKTREE SURVEY DATED 9-6-2018
WITH ADDITIONAL VEGETATION NOTED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
DURING SEPTEMBER 2018 SITE VISIT
(D ^ r
� V /
z 0 °'cn
o
c
N
o �