Loading...
Complete_moreinfo_PLN20160054.pdfCITY OF EDMONDS l2I 5rh Avenue North, Edmonds WA 98020 Phone: 425 .7 7 I .0220 . Fax : 425 .7 7 I .022I .'Web : www.edmondswa. gov DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT . PLANNING DIVISION c. 1 g9 ù December 20,2016 Aidan Bird Studio Meng Strazzara 2001 Western Avenue, Ste 200 Seattle, WA 98121 Subject: Letter of Completeness and Request for Additional Information V/estgate Village Mixed Use Building Design Review Application PLN20 1 60054 Dear Mr. Bird, On behalf of the City of Edmonds Planning Division, I have reviewed the augmented design review application for the West Gate Village Mixed Use Building at 10032 Edmonds 'Way for completeness pursuant to Edmonds Community Development Code (ECDC) 20.02.002 and ECDC 19.00.030. The City has determined that the application meets the procedural submission requirements and therefore is complete. Please accept this letter as the City's notice to applicant of determination of completeness pursuant to ECDC 20.02.003. V/hile the application is procedurally complete, additional information and clarifications are needed for continued review of the application. Please respond to the following so review of this application can proceed: Planning Division Comments: 1. SEPA Checklist: The V/ashington State Department of Ecology updated the SEPA checklist in July 2016. The SEPA checklist submitted with the application is an older version of the SEPA checklist. Please revise and resubmit the SEPA checklist using the current version of the checklist. Here is a link to the word document of the updated SEPA Checklist. 2. Plan Consistency: There are inconsistencies in the plan sheets submitted with the application. For example, the square footage of the retail space in the east wing of the building changes (800 square feet and 1,100 square feet), landscape plan does not include frontage improvements, the Ll level layout changes, and more. Please ensure all of the plan sheets are consistent and accurately depict what is proposed. 3. Setbacks: Pursuant to ECDC 22.II0.010.C, setbacks are measured from the SR 104 right-of-way. The plans show the setback being measure from the curb of SR 104, which is not edge of the right-of-way. V/hile it appears the building would meet the 16-foot setback requirement from the right-of-way, please update the plans so the setbacks are measured from the correct location. 4. Massing and Articulation: ECDC 22.110.015.4.1.c notes: Where a single buildingfacqde exceeds 60feet in length, use a change in designfeatures (such as a combination of materials, windows or decorative details) to ørticulate the building so thqt it appears to consist of multiple smaller-scale building segments. There should be more variation in the building for the facades that exceed 60 feet. For example, the primary commercial facade along SR 104 is 78 feet wide. While the step back on either corner of this facade are differentiated with a different color and material The "wood" portion on the middle two floors make this appear as one segment instead of being broken into smaller building segments as described by ECDC 22.110.015.4.1 .c. 5. Amenity Space: a. In addition to the spatial requirements of amenity spaces (a minimum l5Yo of the project area) amenity spaces must also meet certain requirements for how they are structured. ECDC 22.110.070.C.2 and C.3. Specifically, amenity spaces shall provide a minimum of 20 percent planted pervious surface area (such as a rain garden, bioswale, turf, groundcover, soil or mulch). The remaining balance may be any paved surface with a maximum 30 percent impervious paved surface. The area of provided amenity space is identified; however, it cannot be determined what percentage of the amenity area is planted pervious surface and what percentage is impervious. Please clearly identify on the plans how the amenity area complies with the requirements of ECDC 22.110.070.C.2 and3. b. Pursuant to ECDC 22.1I0.070.C, sidewalks do not count toward the amenity space requirement. A portion of the required sidewalk along SR 104 is included in the amenity space calculations. Please remove the required sidewalk area (the 8-foot proscribed width) from the amenity space calculation and add additional amenity space as need to meet the20Yo required for the height bonus. 6. Public Space - Sustainability: ECDC 22.110.080.8 describes the overall goals for the landscaping in the Westgate Mixed-Use zone, including designing water-efficient landscaping to reduce irrigation requirement and using indigenous/native-in-character and drought tolerant plants. Please describe how the proposed landscaping addresses the requirements of ECDC 22. 1 1 0.080.8. 7. Height Bonus: In order to be eligible for the height bonus allowed by ECDC 22.110.090, a project must score at least eight points on the Height Bonus Score Sheet. The application material indicates the project would score a total of nine points and be eligible for the height bonus. Some elements are verifiable from reviewing the plans such as the amount of amenity space, but other elements cannot be determined. a. Green Building Program will be added as a condition of approval. Once design review has been approved, the architect will have to submit documentation that the building has been designed to meet LEED Silver/Built Green 4-5 Rating as noted on the score sheet. Page 2 of 5 b. Green Factor score will be added as a condition of approval. Once design review has been approved, in accordance with ECDC 22.110.070.8.2the landscape architect will have to submit the scoresheet with the project plans, certifying that the plan meets or exceeds the minimum green factor score and other requirements for the property. c. See comments in Item 5 above regarding amenity space. d. The claimed Miscellaneous Points cannot be determined from the application materials. Please provide the following information so these criteria can be evaluated: i. Identify the Car-Share Parking areas on the plans (minimum 2 spaces). ii. Identify the parking spaces and charging facilities for electric cars (minimum 4 spaces). iii. Identify the bicycle storage and indoor changing facilities on the plans. iv. Provide a description on how public art will be integrated into the provided amenity spaces. 8. Stormwater Facilities: The design guidelines for the W'estgate Mixed Use zone contain many references to incorporating low impact development stormwater techniques into the overall design of the proj ect (ECDC 22.1 I 0.000, 22.1 | 0.030, 22.1 I 0. 05 0. C. 2, 22.110.070, and22.I10.080). While permeable concrete is shown on some of the parking spaces, the no rain gardens, bioswales or other stormwater technique referenced in ECDC 22.110 have been addressed. Please provide information and identiff on the plans how the stormwater requirements of ECDC 22.110 and ECDC 18.30 will be met. 9. Lot Line Adjustment: Please note that a lot line adjustment will be required condition since the amenity space and open space values are calculated on a project area of 48,980 square feet, which does not match the current parcel layout. 10. Parking Agreement: Given that all of the required parking stalls will not be located on the subject property after a lot line adjustment, a parking agreement must be recorded to ensure parking requirements are met. Please note this will be included as a required condition. Engineering Division Comments: 1. A preliminary storm drainage report and plan shall be submitted to the City to confirm project feasibility. a. Stormwater management system(s) shall be shown with invert elevations at facilities and connection to City storm system. b. For those areas where permeable pavement, bio-retention, or other LID technique is provided as a means of meeting stormwater management requirements, infiltration rates shall be provided consistent with City of Edmonds requirements. Refer to Handout E72B &,872D for additional information. Page 3 of5 2. Low Impact Development: ECDC 22J10 V/MU Design Standards requires sustainable site design, including low-impact storm water treatment systems. As such, the following applies to the project and shall clearly be shown on the plans: a. Pervious surfaces shall be integrated into site design and may include: pervious pavement, pervious pavers and vegetated roofs. Capture and reuse strategies including the use of rainwater harvesting cisterns may be substituted for the effective area ofpervious surface required. b. Runoff generated on site shall be routed through a treatment system such as a structured storm water planter, bioswale, rain garden, pervious pavement, or cisterns. (Please note, where pervious pavement is provided as a means of also meeting stormwater management requirements, flows from other adjacent areas shall not be directed to these permeable pavement systems). c. Stormwater runoff from sidewalks should be conveyed to planted parkways or landscaped rain gardens. Overflow from parkways and runoff from the roadways should be directed into bioswales and/or pervious paving in curbside parking areas, along the street edges where it can infiltrate into the ground. Perforated curbs through which street water runoff can flow to open vegetated swales may also be provided, where feasible. (Please note, where pervious pavement is provided os e means of also meeting stormwater management requirements, flows from other adjacent areas shall not be directed to these permeable pavement systems). 3. As noted during the pre-application meeting on91112016, the frontage improvements shall extend along the entire SR-l04/Edmonds Way property frontage. Driveway access points shall be consolidated and the eastern approach shall be removed consistent with V/MU zone requirements and access management plan (shown below). 4. Along a portion of Edmonds Way, the proposal shows the required 5-foot wide landscape buffer (between street and sidewalk), as well as an 8-foot wide sidewalk. In providing these required improvements, it appears as though a portion of the sidewalk will be located on private property. Clearly show or annotate the intent to either dedicate additional right-of-way to the City or provide a public pedestrian easement. )r O trlitlngdrlvew¡Vtoreñ¡¡ô O :¡¡rl.¡ dr¡vew.y ro rcmdè a t¡htlnt drlfdðy to bsme rlaht ru.nr dly O g¡¡rdn8 driveråy link lo lît.rn.l ck(U.tlon dr¡È a OO Cmclptu¡l inrcrñd c¡ßul¡ld drtr (¡lprerßtc k¡thl Access Management Master Plan o I oo. o 104 ril o OO l.- o O, l Page 4 of 5 a. Please note, within the general arcaof the intersection of 100th St SW and SR- 104, the planting buffer may be reduced or excluded, provided that the sidewalk is greater than 8-feet in width. 5. An internal circulation drive has been provided through the site. As perpendicular parking exists along one side of the drive and is proposed along the other, the travel lanes shall be 24-feetin width. The goal established within V/MU zone is to reduce impervious surface areas and therefore, the 24-foot width is also a maximum. Sidewalk areas that flow through the site shall be a minimum of 6-feet in width. Please provide a cross section that confirms these design dimensions. 6. Plans indicate Compact parking stalls to the east of Amenity Area l. Provide stall dimensions to confirm minimum dimensions of 8-feet x 16.5 feet. 7. Water and sewer utilities fall under the purview of the Olympic View Water & Sewer District. Please provide confirmation that OVV/SD has been made aware of the proposed project and that the proposal is found to be feasible from their perspective. According to ECDC 20.02.003.D, the above requested information must be submitted within 90 days (or by March 20,2017) or the application will expire. Since the application has been determined to be procedurally complete, a notice of application will be posted on the subject property and mailed to adjacent property owners within the next two weeks consistent with ECDC 20.03.002. If you have any questions of me, please contact me at 425-771-0220 or via email at kernen. lien@ edmondswa. gov. Y, Lien Senior Planner ô Page 5 of5