CRA19920091.PDFi��
001,
J /�� � III ill III _
Critical Areas ChecklistCRA19920091!
Site information
7VAIW)e*/t'P-Z--Permit Number. Project tame: �N RERMII C.111INTER
Site Lo6ation: WJ 7 61(-Y90"6- WSAProperty Tax Account Number. 77Z1ft--T
Approximite Site Size (acres or square feet): Owe /f 44&
Have you filled out a Critical Areas Checklist for a project on this site before?
Generr,sl Site Conditions 6, e"G7ZW
1. Has the site been cleared or logged? --Date of most recent action:
4'6�*0 V ev
Soils /,Vopography
2. In.the Snohomish County Soil Survey, what is the mapped soil type(s)?
3. Describe the general site topography. Check all that apply.
Flat: less than 5 feet elevation change over entire site.
--,Amlling. slopes on site generally less than 15% (a vertical rise of 10 feet over a.
horizontal distance of 66 feet.)
-JE1i - slopes present on site of more d= 15% and less am 30% a vertical rise Hilly: rise
of 10 feet of horizontal distance.)
...Steep: grades of greater than 30% present on site.
Comments-
Hydroogy/Vegetation
4. Site contains areas of year-round standing water
5. Site contains areas of seasonal standing water. ---Approx. Depth:
6.
Site is in the floodway floodplain of a water course.
7. Sine contains a crep or an area where water flovKs oss the grounds surface? flows
are year-round? IT Flows are seasonal?
8. Site is primarily: forested meadow ;shrubs _;mixed
9. Obvious wetland is present on site:
'�' I
0
10. Wetland inventory or map indicates wetland present on site: 90
Yt:S eta
-d--
11. Ctitical Areas inventory or map indicates any Critical Area on site:
Fbr..,, amity .U-sie Only
fe90 19CI0
City .Of Edmonds !`
Critical Areas Checklist.
The Critical Areas Checklist contained on
this form is to be -filled out by any person
_preparing a Development Permit
""-Application for the City of Edmonds prior
to his/her submittal of a development -permit
to the City.
The purpose of the Checklist is to enable
City staff to determine whether any potential
Critical Areas are or may be present on the
subject property. The information needed. to
•complete the Checklist should be easily
available from observations of the site or
data available at City Hall (Critical Areas
inventories, maps, or soil surveys).
An applicant, or his/her representative,'must
fill out the checklist, sign and date it, and
submit it to the City. The City will review%
the checklist, make a precursory site visit,
and make a determination of the subsequent
steps necessary to complete a development
permit application.
With a signed copy of this form, the
applicant should also submit a vicinity
of the parcel with enough detail that Ci y
staff can find and identify the subject
parcel(s). In addition, the applicant is , r
encouraged to include any other pertinent
information or studies in conjunction with
this Checklist to assist staff in completing
their preliminary assessment of the site.;
I have completed the attached Critical Area Checklist and attest that the answers provided
factual, to the best of my knowledge (fill out the appropriate column below).
Owner / Applicant:
George Kairez
Name
Owner Rep.
Title
9117 Olympic View Drive
Street Address
Edmonds, WA 98026
City, State, ZIP Phone
Signature
Date
Applicant Representative:
Name
Title
Street Address
City, State, ZIP
Signature
�i
Phone
1 Date
Of
v
• • • 1
S S
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF EDMONDS
PLANNING DIVISION
June 14, 1993
TO: FILE CA-92-91
VIA: ROB CHAVE, PLANNING MANAGER
FROM: JOHN BISSELL AICP, CODE ENFORCEMENT TECHNICIAN
r,
SUBJECT: THREE PARTY CONTRACT FOR STUDY OF SLOPE STABILITY ON
j 'PROPERTY LOCATED AT 9117 OLYMPIC VIEW DRIVE.
On June 5, 1992 the City of Edmonds issued a citation to George Kairez for clearing and grading without
a permit on the property located at 9117 Olympic View Drive. As Part of enforcement Mr. Kairez was
Etguired to.obtain a clearing permit for the clearing. Prior to the processing of a clearing permit, a
critical areas study was required to assess the stability of the slope to the west of the subject property,
and any reductions in stability created by the clearing and the pushing of debris over the top of the bank
of,the slope, and list any mitigation or repair measures. Section 20.15B.150 requires the City, the
Applicant, and the Consultant conducting the study to enter into a three party contract. In this case the
applicant hired Geotech Consultants to perform the required study without entering into a three party
contract.
t
The City believes that the consultant who performed the work was qualified to perform the work. The
City also believes that the information presented in the consultant's report answered the question about
the slope stability. The City understands that the applicant did not enter into the three party contract as
required by code. However, the applicant has been cited and there have been numerous court hearings.
The citation was issued nearly one year before the writing of this memorandum. In addition the property
owner has submitted preliminary plans for subdivision review for a larger parcel which includes all of the
property that was originally of concern. This new application will require both critical areas review and
SEPA review. This larger parcel includes all of the property that was originally of concern. Therefore,
due to the extreme amount of time spent on the enforcement of this case, and the inclusion of the
property in a new development application, the City hereby waives the requirement of the three party
contract and considers the study complete.
The critical areas study does not recommend any mitigations. The clearing work was done over one year
ago, and the grasses and other natural vegetation on the site have grown back. Therefore there is no need
for erosion control mitigation.
C'
Any future work will be reviewed separately with a new critical areas review.
t.
i
F
PEI