DRAINAGE STUDY.pdfRECEIVED
.4
NOV 19 2015
Seaview Elementary School DEE111PMENT SERVICES
Mayfield Subsurface Drainage Improvements
Api E!� 1411 j APPLICABLE
CODE
(I
Playfield Drainage Study
I June 2015 LUpdated _November 201_511 Drainage Impact Study
w'n Olig rrqeqs'ry'
xntlm'l ml"tc'd permitting, the
rendisting illegal,
nomonformiro ,, or yf w)errnitted building, strueftire
or Site Mndulc« 'M'001 if; 0,11taide the HWPe of the,
rrmit, appi io: ui,�rt. , r' �,ms of whether Buch
11ildirig" at« W�,,turda it -,'i! tion is shown on the
site rh"%ii or w)Uflding,Btrudmreor
0 'i
unchtwn +"Tr"'v 'k -,"j:et of a separatti
MIN
siA.Anq
Engineers
RO, i I It"A"
FET)
k)",
y
5
17
A1,11t.) IMNAAG'��',,
P
ENGINEERING PlE Ww' Y'
Seaview Elementary Playfield 'Drainage Study
June 2015,(Uodated No em er 201
Prepared for:
Edmonds School District #15
Nick Chou, Design and Construction Manager
2042068 th Avenue West
Lynnwood, WA 98036
(425) 431-7161
Prepared by:
Thaddeus J. Egging, PE, LEEP AP BD+C
KPFF Consulting Engineers
1601 5th Avenue, Suite 1600
Seattle, WA 98101
(206) 622-5822
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
I
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
1. Overview
This study looks at the drainage impacts associated with the addition of an underdrain system to the Seaview
Elementary School Playfield located at 8426 188th Street SW, Edmonds, WA 98026. The existing and proposed
conditions were modeled using the Santa Barbara Urban Hydrograph method in StormShed2G.
2. Existing Conditions
In the existing condition, stormwater runoff from the field sheet flows away from the grade break that runs north -
south through the center of the field. The runoff then sheet flows into swales on the east and west sides of the
field where it is collected in a series of catch basins and conveyed to the northwest corner of the field (see Figure
1: Existing Conditions in appendix A).
For this study, the existing playfield was divided into two drainage basins (east and west) with a single point of
compliance at the existing catch basin in the northwest corner of the field (see Figure 1). The times of
concentration (Tc) for the existing basins were taken from the highpoint at the south end of the field following the
flow lines down to the swales on the east and west sides of the field, into the nearest downstream catch basin,
through the drain pipe system and ending at the catch basin in the northwest corner of the field.
When run through StormShed, the model for the existing conditions produced a total peak flow of 0.733 cfs
at 8.17 hours for the 25 -year event at the point of compliance catch basin (see Table 2-1). See StormShed
calculations report in Appendix C.
Table 2-1: Existing Conditions Results'
3. Proposed Conditions
Proposed improvements to the playfield consist of an underdrain system to collect runoff from the field. For the
proposed condition, the playfield was divided into three drainage basins (central, east, and west) with the same
point of compliance as the existing condition at the catch basin in the northwest corner of the field (see Figure 2:
Proposed Conditions in Appendix A). The first drainage basin is the central portion of the field that contributes to
the proposed underdrain system. The other two basins are the east and west portions of the playfield that do not
contribute to the underdrain system. The Tc for the east and west basins were taken from the highpoint at the
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
1
24-hour
East Basin
West Basin
Total
Weighted
Event
Precip. (in)
Peak Q (cfs)
Peak T (hrs)
Peak Q (cfs)
Peak T (hrs)
Peak Q (cfs)
Peak T (hrs)
2 -year
1.6
0.098
8.17
0.090
8.17
0.188
8.17
10 -year
2.5
0.272
8.17
0.251
8.17
0.522
8.17
25 -year
3.0
0.381
8.17
0.352
8.17
0.733
8.17
50 -year
3.2
0.426
8.17
0.394
8.17
0.820
8.17
100 -year
3.6
0.518
8.17
0.480
8.17
0.998
8.17
Table LjMdated November 2015 for H drolo is Soil
Grout C
3. Proposed Conditions
Proposed improvements to the playfield consist of an underdrain system to collect runoff from the field. For the
proposed condition, the playfield was divided into three drainage basins (central, east, and west) with the same
point of compliance as the existing condition at the catch basin in the northwest corner of the field (see Figure 2:
Proposed Conditions in Appendix A). The first drainage basin is the central portion of the field that contributes to
the proposed underdrain system. The other two basins are the east and west portions of the playfield that do not
contribute to the underdrain system. The Tc for the east and west basins were taken from the highpoint at the
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
1
south end of each basin, similar to the existing condition. For the central basin, the To was taken along the flow
line between the longitudinal underdrain pipes, and then downstream through the longest path of the underdrain
system ending at the point of compliance.
When run through StormShed, the model for the proposed conditions produced a total peak flow of . 0.927
cfs at 8.05 hours for the 25 -year event at the point of compliance catch basin (see Table 3-1). See StormShed
calculations report in Appendix C.
Table 3-1: Proposed Conditions Results'
°Table u, dated November 2915 fr.)r iy cL,gjU bra
4. Model Inputs and Assumptions
• Project Precipitation Values (in inches) taken from WSDOT 24-hour Isopluvial Map
• Existing drain pipe slope of 2.0%
• Proposed underdrain slope of 1.0%
• Existing impervious pathway around field perimeter is excluded from model
• See attached StormShed reports for specific basin model inputs
• ul ori tydirlgglc Soul Grow
5. Downstream of the Point -of -Compliance
From the point of compliance catch basin, stormwater flows through a 12 -inch pipe sloped at 2 -percent to an
existing drainage feature located along the north edge of the school site. The drainage feature surface flows at 1
percent slope to a 12 -inch pipe sloped at 2 -percent that discharges to the City drainage system.
The drainage feature consists of a trapezoidal Swale with a 2 -foot wide bottom, 1:5 side slopes,
f#ow defath-witl444 of n d_a,total de th of 1'-4". The feature is broken into
"North Portion" and "South Portion" (see Drainage Report for Seaview Elementary prepared by SVR, June 20
1996, in Appendix B). The play field is tributary to the "south portion". Additionally, a portion of the existing
parking lot also discharges to the "south portion" drainage feature.
Per the SVR Drainage Report (Appendix B) the drainage feature is designed to convey the 100 -year storm event.
F1gwever,_1! g.. -fl Via„ " er kt ... VR...fg:olt is o"I w 4ich or 25 eroent of the s�walo tl ....As fl yi�gpg
event i ni this c�e is the i ygan_gt rrl w w d ave 9 :jl�lt c, 1@( ty I sod �°� th Swale (lo il� t , r eit(
taNIN or 12inches dee -1 Nuf� y�alg_wg ooit o 2 C�(�. �tss ;oµ f�gr°y i E 1 he ooh kart"g..loL o��arrtrw ��to a of and
the d v lop d fief contrlb t m1 2w6wcfstper Table 1 ,fora total flow o 1.54 cfs rh outh-Portlm)" 4,eature has
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study - Edmonds School District #15
2
24-hour
Central Basin
East Basin
West Basin
Total
Weighted
Event
lPrecip.(in)
Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (hrs) Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (hrs) Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (hrs) Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (hrs)
2 -year
1.6
0.174 8.00
0.041 8.17
0.031
8.17
0.246
8.05
10 -year
2.5
0.467 8.00
0.111 8.17
0.086
8.17
0.665
8.05
25 -year
3.0 1
0.650 1 8.00
0.156 8.17
0.121
8.17
0.927
8.05
50 -year
3.2
0.725 8.00
1 0.174 8.17
0.135
8.17
1.035
8.05
100 -year
1 3.6
0.880 8.00
1 0.212 8.17
0.165
8.17
1.256
8.05
°Table u, dated November 2915 fr.)r iy cL,gjU bra
4. Model Inputs and Assumptions
• Project Precipitation Values (in inches) taken from WSDOT 24-hour Isopluvial Map
• Existing drain pipe slope of 2.0%
• Proposed underdrain slope of 1.0%
• Existing impervious pathway around field perimeter is excluded from model
• See attached StormShed reports for specific basin model inputs
• ul ori tydirlgglc Soul Grow
5. Downstream of the Point -of -Compliance
From the point of compliance catch basin, stormwater flows through a 12 -inch pipe sloped at 2 -percent to an
existing drainage feature located along the north edge of the school site. The drainage feature surface flows at 1
percent slope to a 12 -inch pipe sloped at 2 -percent that discharges to the City drainage system.
The drainage feature consists of a trapezoidal Swale with a 2 -foot wide bottom, 1:5 side slopes,
f#ow defath-witl444 of n d_a,total de th of 1'-4". The feature is broken into
"North Portion" and "South Portion" (see Drainage Report for Seaview Elementary prepared by SVR, June 20
1996, in Appendix B). The play field is tributary to the "south portion". Additionally, a portion of the existing
parking lot also discharges to the "south portion" drainage feature.
Per the SVR Drainage Report (Appendix B) the drainage feature is designed to convey the 100 -year storm event.
F1gwever,_1! g.. -fl Via„ " er kt ... VR...fg:olt is o"I w 4ich or 25 eroent of the s�walo tl ....As fl yi�gpg
event i ni this c�e is the i ygan_gt rrl w w d ave 9 :jl�lt c, 1@( ty I sod �°� th Swale (lo il� t , r eit(
taNIN or 12inches dee -1 Nuf� y�alg_wg ooit o 2 C�(�. �tss ;oµ f�gr°y i E 1 he ooh kart"g..loL o��arrtrw ��to a of and
the d v lop d fief contrlb t m1 2w6wcfstper Table 1 ,fora total flow o 1.54 cfs rh outh-Portlm)" 4,eature has
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study - Edmonds School District #15
2
a.i-apacify.��f ��...�smw�fh 2«fe�sditd�ta the--pa�'k�,n._4i nod 1.�fsedi�iedtathe�.ay,f�e�d...s
$00-year-flow frorn4he-pfGpossd
favid i& 0 -.404.256-06,-
Additionally, 12 -inch pipes sloped at 2 -percent slope have a 6.55 cfs capacity. Well in excess of anticipated flows
at this site.
A downstream analysis has been performed to verify increased flows from the site do not adversely impact City of
Edmonds infrastructure. Refer to the Technical Memorandum in Appendix D for detailed information. At City of
Edmonds direction, the point of compliance for the analysis is the existing catch basin in 88th Avenue West. The
analysis showed that the increase in flows are minimal and will not adversely impact existing infrastructure.
6. Summary
While the addition of the underdrain system does increase peak flow from the playfield the downstream
infrastructure has adequate capacity for this flow. As such, no adverse impacts are expected with this project.
Edmonds School District will continue to maintain the existing drainage features as well as clean the inlet out
outlet pipes so as to maintain continued function.
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
3
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
Appendix A
Site Plans
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
Appendix A
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
Appendix A
J J (WD
NZ q }C] Q 2 q
rnQ p0 Ip-;� Z Z m JCCZUO Q
� w< xF- O 00 of cc0<5;;=
C, Cr of ~�o U FUw FaIz Ol< o
W=W=LL0 min w fnM WmOp�Om(w7
LLLL _ o r� a0 OOw
_ d U
O r x O N r 7[ O z} Z Z U p U W 0> Z
rU Z� Wtll W QZ- w -W ZF-
wUm O� W U rdr Uacna,jQZ O
�nw4 ZLLU 2%Rwzow !-
<aw g� zpo zd ��� ��woavz¢ w
--o qw w P.
z ooari ¢wZz�Ux 5
a0, W-4 O Pin O ZZZ wwgQUga O
Qpm Z� 05 Cq 4Q0 �? W CC
c9` Z FO U ��°w a wSw Oz P: 15 I
cc<U 3d w Z, 1% > Up �crnrx- ¢>F°'¢¢., Q
Z8Z W4 >,: W QO 4 y WOO 65EEZZE F-
px0 rw5 w ¢fin¢ ¢ F- m— c -U -"Dgz U
o QOy UQr Z CC�w R Uro OZ Lu 'n 0zF4- a
w}Z Oma O woo w O Wwz 0� )-M¢oQo
Woo' a_'sZ = oro 3 ��p ww<wZZww xw
QCL} Y m [L WWZ W J ¢aq ww[L (L m� OCC
TW
LL wwzwmw
W lV fq o OU .- W N Z t7 d' *-'i > Vf U !- `2 Q w 0 W.... _. t6 LL'
W
QLJ
wct7
Fw-
O
0
cwaz4
w
sn
-¢FO
wpCi
O
CC
a
X
wZU+a
Zt%Qtn
QoIS
[L
WLL!
dUZZ
p=
Fd2w
W-ZF=
F.R.
Qm
Z¢
opaU
LL
't,
m
Q W Q
w
x
mw
d
Q, W
c7�
x�W
r-p
zdp>
w
o
Oz
aOw¢
O?E
x z w
q
W
Op
F m
�qSi
=
r
� is
Z 0
Q J
JJJ d
OC]z
J
NCC
JZNO
a Q m
N
m O
in O Q N
F
Z
�O
Wo<<
UFF
moo
o
a .
>Mcn
Cl)
W $
Qto m
w
(� w 3
O z
Q w m
atS z z
6 a
O o
= U
Q
FILTER FABRIC
SECURED TO 2' X 2'
14 GA, WIRE FABRIC
EQUAL
2' X 2' WOOD OR � I o
EQUIVALENT I
8'— 12'
1 41
8'
PLACE 3/4'-1.5' WASHED GRAVEL IN
THE TRENCH AND ON BOTH SIDES OF
FILTER FABRIC FENCE ON THE SURFACE.
0
I
oj
Figure 3A: COE E1.1
Filter Fabric Fence Detail
FILTER FABRIC MATERIAL IN
C❑NTIN❑US ROLLS, USE STAPLES
OR WIRE RINGS TO ATTACH
FABRIC TO WIRE,
IV II
I WIRE MESH SUPPORT FEN�E
I
TO SUPPORT FILTER FAIMIC,
II I�
ffUW ,,I I 17W 1
BURY BOTTOM OF FILTER d
N MATERIAL 8' TO 12'
Via' MAX. I
L1\,
2 X 2 WOOD POSTS OR
EQUIVALENT
ONTRACT❑R/DEVELOPER SHALL MAINTAIN AND REPLACE
STRAW BALES TO INSURE PROPER EROSI❑N CONTROL,
CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL
EROSI❑N CONTROL METHODS BEFORE
OTHER WORK CAN BEGIN,
`IT
» . 0 L) S,.,. -E, D M.
11
R Vo IONS STANDARD DETAIL
MU
7/24/01 1
SCALE NTS I 0 No' E1.1
Figure 3B: COE E1.3
Inlet/Catch Basin Protection
.GRATE
•�
CATCH BASIN
CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL ER❑SI❑N CONTROL
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN,
THIS APPLICATI❑N SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES
DURING C❑NSTRUCTI❑N PERI❑D.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED ON
A REGULAR BASIS TO MAINTAIN
FILTRATI❑N EFFECTIVENESS,
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
ROVED r gar
D. GEBERT 10/06/03 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS
D, GEBERT 05/19/05
D, GEBERT 05/05/06 uarE scams JDWG No.
R.
ENGLISH 11/01/13 7/24/01 NTS E1.3
14
A4
Figure 3B: COE E1.3
Inlet/Catch Basin Protection
.GRATE
•�
CATCH BASIN
CITY INSPECTI❑N REQUIRED ON ALL ER❑SI❑N CONTROL
MEASURES BEFORE WORK CAN BEGIN,
THIS APPLICATI❑N SHALL BE
MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES
DURING C❑NSTRUCTI❑N PERI❑D.
SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED ON
A REGULAR BASIS TO MAINTAIN
FILTRATI❑N EFFECTIVENESS,
REVISIONS STANDARD DETAIL
ROVED r gar
D. GEBERT 10/06/03 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT TRAP FOR CATCH BASINS
D, GEBERT 05/19/05
D, GEBERT 05/05/06 uarE scams JDWG No.
R.
ENGLISH 11/01/13 7/24/01 NTS E1.3
lov, i 111 fa, j", im id ai � 111's 5
w
14
IS16
M
MS ; is H1881
i g
R,
i
TH-
co
co
V �v
LU
ilv
-M
s I
1w
V �v
Appendix
Drainage Report for Seaview Elementary
SVR Design
June 20, 1996
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
Appendix B
Seaview Elementary Playfield Drainage Study — Edmonds School District #15
Appendix B
D E S I G N C 0 M P A N Y C 1 V i I E n g i n e e r i n g
Drainage Report
For
Seaview Elementary
Edmonds, Washington
PERMIT SUBMITTAL
June 20, 1996
Prepared for: Edmonds School District #15
Prepared by: SvR Design Company
Address: 1008 Western Ave. #301
Seattle, WA 98104
Phone: (206) 223-0326
SvR #94015
P I a n n i n g L a n d s c i p e A i ( h i i e c c u r e
S
v
R
D E 5 1 G N
C 0 PI
P A N Y
C I, u I L n 1; h in . r i o g M a n n a of 41
TABLE OF CONTENTS
�,.. r,1 , . v la , ,A, i chi u c ¢ u� r .
Page #
I. Drainage Review
7
Overview .,. _....... .„w ..........
3
Existing Conditions .......................... . . , ............
3
Proposed Conditions ... , ........ „ .. . ......... . ... . ..... . . .
3,4
Offsite Analysis .... , .... „ ........ . ...... „ .... , .. . , . , ....
4
Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control . ...... . .......
4,5
II.. Figures
Figure 1 - Vicinity Map ...... , . . .......... . ... . . . „ ...... .
7
Figure 2 - Topographical Map .... , . „ „ .......... . . ........ . . ..
8
Figure 3 - Soils Map ...... , ... ...........
9
Figure 4 - Existing Site Plan ........... , „ ..... „ . , .. „ ..........
10
Figure 5 - Proposed Site Plan ................. . . . „ .......... .
11
Figure 6 - Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control Plan , , , , , , , , , , ,,, ,
12
Figure 7 - Impervious Vehicular Load Areas .... .. . ... . ..... « . , . „ ..
13
Figure 8 - Pervious/Impervious Areas ........ „ ........ „ .........
14
III. Appendix
June 20, 1996 i Seaview Elementary - Drainage Report.
Page 2 of 43
1 a r[ ui i m„ L or d. c i c I i r 11 i..¢ o[ i
. Drainage Review
June 20, 1996 2 Seaview Elementary - Drains,, e;, Report.
Page 3 �J3
V_
D E S I G N
C O M
P A N Y G:: r `r I
fr. n„ rG c ,. u 1 111
1 a r[ ui i m„ L or d. c i c I i r 11 i..¢ o[ i
. Drainage Review
June 20, 1996 2 Seaview Elementary - Drains,, e;, Report.
Page 3 �J3
S v R
D E S I G NC O M P A N Y C i v i I E n g i n e e r i n g P I a n n n g L a n d s c a p e A c h i t e c t u r e
Overview°
Edmonds School District is proposing modifications to the existing Seaview Elementary school
site. These modifications include building additions, parking and circulation changes, addition
of landscape areas, court yard changes, rerouting of utilities, and adding an educational drainage
feature. These improvements result in a net decrease in the amount of site impervious surface.
Based on the City of Edmonds Storm Water Management Ordinance, the storm drainage erosion
control, storm drainage detention, and water quality requirements do not apply to this site. See
Figure 1 for Vicinity Map. The following drainage report discusses the existing site and storm
drainage system, outlines the proposed site and storm drainage system, gives an offsite analysis,
and discuses the proposed temporary sedimentation and erosion control. Storm drainage
calculations are shown in the Appendix.
Existing Conditions
SITE
The existing site consists of two buildings, a north parking lot, a east bus drop-off, a west and
south play area, and a fire lane. The existing site is shown in Figure 4.
DRAINAGE
The existing bus drop-off sheet flows to the east into a series of catch basins located in a ditch
at the east edge of the pavement. From here the storm water in is conveyed through lines running
northwest across the north parking lot to the existing storm drainage system which runs east to
west along 188th Street SW. The north parking lot sheet flows into catch basins that are part of
the system that crosses the parking lot. A small offsite area to the east of the east property line
also drains into this system.
The existing west and south play areas sheet flow to the storm drainage system that runs east to
west along the south side of the existing buildings. This system connects to the storm drainage
system along 86th Pl. W. which connects to the storm drainage system along 188th Street SW.
The existing site improvement area includes a total pervious area of 0.52 acre, a total impervious
area of 3.69 acres.
Proposed Conditions
SITE
Edmonds School district proposes an addition to the north and south of the existing buildings,
adding a new gymnasium south, re -paving and modifying the north parking lot / east bus drop-off
/ fire lane / west and south play area /and court yard, addition of landscape areas, rerouting of
utilities, and adding an educational drainage feature. The proposed site is shown in Figure 5.
June 20, 1996 3 svmview Element �ary Drama qe Report,
Pa c 43
S
v
R
D E 5 1 G N
C 0 M
P A N Y
C i v i I E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g L a n d s c a p e A i c h i t e c t u r e
DRAINAGE
Proposed site drainage will discharge to the existing locations. New catch basins and storm lines
are proposed in some locations to accommodate the site improvements. The west play area, a
portion of the south play area, and the west roof downspouts will drain to the educational
drainage feature before discharging into the existing storm drainage system that runs east to west
along the south side of the existing buildings.
The proposed site improvement area includes a total pervious area of 0.88 acre and a total
impervious area of 3.33 acres. The existing and proposed areas are summarized below.
The City of Edmonds Storm Water Management Ordinance specifes that neither detention nor
biofiltration are required for this site since there is less than 2,000 SF of new impervious area.
Offsite Analysis
Sources of background information for the off site analysis include the following:
• A field visit was made on September 12, 1995.
The downstream system was determined by field investigation and using City of
Edmonds Storm Water System as -built drawings.
UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY AREA
A small area east of the north parking lot sheet flows to the lot (approx. 0.25 acre). A small
area east of the bus drop-off sheet flows into the catch basins along the east edge of pavement
(approx. 0.10 acre). An area to the east of the south play area flows to this area (approx. .5
acre).
DOWN STREAM ANALYSIS
June 20. 1996 4 seaviewle"IWIt" irange Rel'xowl
I ago 5 of 4,3
Vehicular
Non -Vehicular
Total Impervious
Pervious Area
Impervious
Impervious Area
Area (acres)
(acres)
Area (acres)
(acres)
Existing
1.06
2.63
3.69
0.52
Proposed
1.00
2.33
3.33
0.88
New Impervious/
-0.06
-0.30
-0.36
0.36
New Pervious
The City of Edmonds Storm Water Management Ordinance specifes that neither detention nor
biofiltration are required for this site since there is less than 2,000 SF of new impervious area.
Offsite Analysis
Sources of background information for the off site analysis include the following:
• A field visit was made on September 12, 1995.
The downstream system was determined by field investigation and using City of
Edmonds Storm Water System as -built drawings.
UPSTREAM TRIBUTARY AREA
A small area east of the north parking lot sheet flows to the lot (approx. 0.25 acre). A small
area east of the bus drop-off sheet flows into the catch basins along the east edge of pavement
(approx. 0.10 acre). An area to the east of the south play area flows to this area (approx. .5
acre).
DOWN STREAM ANALYSIS
June 20. 1996 4 seaviewle"IWIt" irange Rel'xowl
I ago 5 of 4,3
From the site the existing storm drainage system drains to the west along 188th St. SW
through a closed drainage system to 88th Ave W, and eventually flows into the Puget Sound,
The 1/4 mile down stream investigations showed no major existing problems. A few of the
catch basins need to be cleaned of debris.
Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control
A combination of Best Management Practices (BMPS) will be used to limit erosion and sediment
runoff during construction. Preservation of natural vegetation, limiting area of construction
impact, and efforts to limit the site construction to the dry season, will be used in combination
with erosion and sediment control facilities.
Temporary seeding will be used for erosion control in areas that would remain bare for more than
15 days. Areas exposed at any given time will be limited to the minimum as is practical.
Permanent seeding will be established as rapidly as possible.
BMPS include catch basin protection, silt fence and construction entrance, see Figure b for
recommended layout.
June 20, 1996 5 Seaview Elemenuuyage 6 n0af 49C'0
V
D E 5 1 G N
C 0 M P A N Y v I V'. i'r p; o n ¢s c; r ro (; A d'° A a ru n o �� w « L. �. iu d
.. ,. p : A u[
In c i, q o ,•<
From the site the existing storm drainage system drains to the west along 188th St. SW
through a closed drainage system to 88th Ave W, and eventually flows into the Puget Sound,
The 1/4 mile down stream investigations showed no major existing problems. A few of the
catch basins need to be cleaned of debris.
Temporary Erosion/Sedimentation Control
A combination of Best Management Practices (BMPS) will be used to limit erosion and sediment
runoff during construction. Preservation of natural vegetation, limiting area of construction
impact, and efforts to limit the site construction to the dry season, will be used in combination
with erosion and sediment control facilities.
Temporary seeding will be used for erosion control in areas that would remain bare for more than
15 days. Areas exposed at any given time will be limited to the minimum as is practical.
Permanent seeding will be established as rapidly as possible.
BMPS include catch basin protection, silt fence and construction entrance, see Figure b for
recommended layout.
June 20, 1996 5 Seaview Elemenuuyage 6 n0af 49C'0
S
v R
D E S
I G N C 0 M P A N Y
C i v i I'.i. rr ro r: i., r' �n p; P V a n iri fi in g
. Figures
June 20, 1996 6 Seaview Elementary - Drainage Report.
Page 7 of 43
June 20, 1996
(; v I [- g i m I= c r i n y, 1 11 o n n u I I K I v ii d s f, a p o A r , h e c l i i i
FIGURE 1 - VICININY MAP
LUX PAM
iil
7 Seaview Elementary - Drainage Report,
Page, 3 of 43
V
R
D E S I G N
C 0 M
P A N Y
June 20, 1996
(; v I [- g i m I= c r i n y, 1 11 o n n u I I K I v ii d s f, a p o A r , h e c l i i i
FIGURE 1 - VICININY MAP
LUX PAM
iil
7 Seaview Elementary - Drainage Report,
Page, 3 of 43
A"
v
R
D F S I G
N C 0 M
P A N Y
FIGURE 2 - TOPOGRAPHICAL MAP
June 20, 1996 8 Seaview Elemel.ghb-
eport.
S
v
R
D E S I
G N C 0 M
P A N Y
C 1 V V I ff n ?, i n, e r i n Y I I" I n '1 1! u (I G Q a iti d ( a p
FIGURE 3 - SOILS MAP
USDA Soil Survey for Snohomish County Area classifies the soils in the vicinity of the site as
Alderwood- Urban land complex, with 2 to 8 percent slopes on the southeastern portion of the
site and 8 to 15 percent slopes on the northwestern portion of the site.
71ZY
June 20, 1996 9 Seaview Eleme�Df6noa
11 -Mg , fe4ffo"'
IS
'v
R
D E S
I G IN C 0
M P A N Y
June 20, 1996
d P ( 3 1, e! A r c 4 f i'v c L u r"
FIGURE 4 - EXISTING SITE PLAN
to Seaview Eleineota pjai0nfg4&eport.
a56
ire
.410
Ban 16
i A
lit
pm=m
h
Nato Fuspulamp f
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
T.
to
...........
S
v
R
D E 5 1 G N
C 0 M
P A N Y
v
4_ a ,, I n g it 1 M P, v II w n n I n f, L.. , of d �.,
i ', p e
/'1 i r,;.
Iv
FIGURE
5 - PROPOSED SITE PLAN
June 20, 1996 11 Seaview Elem9gw ?T�mjleporl,
"'Zoo
all, I Vill Q
i 19,
Cl)
'IT
IL
IL
00
BRA
I
I
Ng I
I I`
I
I
— I
—
In!
5
MP,
v
l'
k�o
li
a
I all,a
Rl
Sd 8
§
8
hT,
—TMG7
00
In!
5
MP,
v
l'
k�o
00
S v R
D E S I G N C O M P A N Y % �; rn r u Vu
FIGURE 6 - TEMPORARY EII.OSION/SLI)Im[ENTATION COMMOL
PLAN
June 20, 1996 12 Seaview Elem fye TpJaiBfip SOPO`
ID
m
0
A
W
..� ..
D E S I G N C O M P A N Y :, I. �� V II G �r� it a Ni uw V M t� L a is d u, r �;� p wu^, v R A a �¢ In V i'�, � t
FIGURE 7 - TMPDD VIOUS Vlr4,IHCUI,AR LOAD AREAS
June 20, 1996 13 Seaview Elemp-11�,t�Ro4tReporl.
S
v, R,
v
D E S I G N
C 0 M P A N Y
I li ro y„ k ri ¢ w, u d m i„ . P, V a n d in p 11V. 'n or j r u I c A f, Q
June 20, 1996 14 Seaview EIemP*- f 4.&evo t.
S
v
R
D E S I G N
C 0 M
P A N Y
(,' d u 1 1: o K 1 n c i" r i n g 0 1 a n 1u o n g u d , a ", r c h i(v� i, au I
III. APPENDIX
June 20, 1996 15 Seaview Elenipt ye 2ja1fgg teport.
Civil Engineering
R S
Planning
®
Landscape Architecture v R
D E S I G N C 0 M P A N Y C 6 v I I Eir''gineoring
D E S I G IN C 0 m P
Sheet of
Job #
F
Project , 1'
Planning L Peqigpeq by
P1
A N Y Checked by Date
e_'
4�' / .,/ I , .J
'u. Z"',
Civil Engineering
10, S R '•Planning
V R Landscape Architecture
D E S I G N C 0 M P A N Y C i V E i n o, (,, r i n 8
D E S I G N (1 0 m P
�P�
Sheet Of
Job # 2, -
Project
n Y L
A N Y Checked by Date
1 1
-t7
11
La
rc
UL
yq
ha
777
C5
UL
yq
ha
777
1/17/96 11:32:22 am SvR Design Company page 1
----------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: field100
NAME: field
runoff,
prop,100yr,
24hr
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
4.59 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERV'
IMP
PRECIPITATION — — :
3.00 inches
AREA..:
4.07 Acres
0.52 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:.
86.00
90.00
TC.....
62.77 min
62.77 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 150.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.3400
TcReach - Sheet L: 270.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0200
TcReach - Sheet L: 198.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0200
PEAK RATE: 0.92 cfs VOL: 0.65 Ac -ft TIME: 490 min
S
v
H
D E
S
I
G
IN
t.w II Ellyllluul Illy
Planning
Landscape Architecture
C 0 m P A N Y
'S
A
ko -Ar Y, 4�S
0
fp
allt!"It --lryro
-
Job #
Project
Designed by Date
Chocked by Date
1/17/96 1:51:14 pm SvR Design Company page 1
----------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: cb13100p
NAME: near
cbl3, 100yr, 24hr
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
0.25 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA,.: 0.10 Acres
0.15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN..,.: 86.00
90.00
TC..... 5.00 min
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 18.00 ns:0.1500
p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.11
cfs VOL: 0.04
Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: swwrf100
NAME: runoff
sw of wbldg, prop,100yr
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
0.15 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPElA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..: 0.00 Acres
0.15 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....: 86.00
90.00
TC..... 0.19 min
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 34.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.6000
PEAK RATE: 0.07
cfs VOL: 0.02
Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
0
co
cli
0
cj
0
v
6/20/96 6:31:33 am SvR Design Company page 1
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: nwwrf100
NAME: runoff nw of
wbldg, prop,100yr
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
0.07 Acres
BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPEIA
PERV IMP
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.00 Acres 0.07 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
CN....:
86.00 90.00
TC.....
0.19 min 5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 34.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr:
1.50 s:0.6000
PEAK RATE: 0.03
cfs VOL: 0.01
Ac -ft TIME: 500 min
S
v
H
D
E
S
I
G
N
• Liva trigineering
• Planning
LandscapeArchimmure
C 0 m p A N Y
-ineat at
Jab #
Project :?AV)�W EhfrY7
Designed by Datd—/�--7)•
Checked by Date _
%
Page 30 of 43
0
77=
M,
1/17/96 2:37:50 pm SvR Design Company page 1
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: crt100
NAME: courtyard, 100yr,
24hr
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......;
0.74 Acres BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPEIA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION....;
3.00 inches AREA..:
0.11 Acres
0,63 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min CN....:
86.00
98.00
TC.....
5.00 min
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 47.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50
s:0.2500
TcReach - Channel
L: 230.00 kc:21.00 s:0.0200
PEAK RATE: 0.43
cfs VOL: 0.16 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
hKV Z)
U�Wll uiyurom my
Planning
Landscape Architecture
C 0 m P, A N Y
-" ;?r'
-out
—1t.—
Job # 7"
Project
Designed by
Checked by Date
V
ti
D
E
S
I
G
N
hKV Z)
U�Wll uiyurom my
Planning
Landscape Architecture
C 0 m P, A N Y
-" ;?r'
-out
—1t.—
Job # 7"
Project
Designed by
Checked by Date
1/17/96 3:1:38 pm SvR Design Company page 1
------------
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: npkg100
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
RAINFALL TYPE....:
PRECIPITATION....:
TIME INTERVAL....:
NAME: n of n pkglot, 100yr, 24hr
0.20 Acres
TYPEIA
3.00 inches
10.00 min
BASEFLOWS:
AREA..:
CN....
TC....
0.00 cfs
PERV
0.02 Acres
86.00
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 30.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0440
TcReach - Channel L: 40.00 kc:42.00 s:0.0170
TcReach - Sheet L: 80.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0440
TcReach - Channel L: 70.00 kc:42.00 s:0.0440
impTcReach - Sheet L: 143.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0440
PEAK RATE: 0.09 cfs VOL: 0.03 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
BASIN ID: spkg100
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
RAINFALL TYPE....;
PRECIPITATION....:
TIME INTERVAL.....
NAME: s of n pkglot, 100yr, 24hr
0.13 Acres
TYPEIA
3.00 inches
10.00 min
BASEFLOWS:
AREA...
CN....
TC....
0.00 cfs
PERV
0.00 Acres
86.00
5.00 min
IMP
0.18 Acres
90.00
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 18.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
impTcReach - Sheet L: 143.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0440
PEAK RATE: 0.06 cfs VOL: 0.02 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
IMP
0.13 Acres
90.00
5.00 min
Page 34 of 43
1/18/96 3:21:58 pm SvR Design Company page 1
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: park100p NAME: n parking area, 100yr, 24hr
SBUH METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......: 1.40 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....: TYPEIA PERV
PRECIPITATION....: 3.00 inches AREA — : 0.38 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....: 10.00 min CN.... 86.00
TC...., 5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 45.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.5000
TcReach - Sheet L: 155.00 ns:0.0110 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.0440
TcReach - Channel L: 193.00 kc:42.00 s:0.0100
PEAK RATE: 0.77 cfs VOL: 0.29 Ac -ft TIME: 480 min
IMP
1.02 Acres
98.00
5.00 min
2 C3
. .... .. ..
.. ... . ..............
Ui
W
<
it
0
to
til
3:
co
ti
c
. .....
no ....................
>_
Of
V)
fi
ID
Cl)
®r
. ......... ... . .........
D_
F7
ter
r'
15
P
CL
Z
Ir o <
ui
CV
01 .
L)
o
Y
ill
bo
yr
4
Q
ag .9
2 C3
. .... .. ..
.. ... . ..............
Ui
W
<
cr
to
til
3:
ti
c
. .....
no ....................
>_
Of
V)
fi
®r
. ......... ... . .........
F7
ter
r'
CL
Z
Ir o <
ui
CV
01 .
L)
o
Y
ill
bo
Q
ag .9
61,
0cn
T(o
r..3
l
b00
Li
0 <
c) 3:
3NVI SIl S ON.�
/_A0
r.
Lid
, -:
ui
I
L e
UJI
L z
L) Ui LLI
Wo� Llj:�
Cb
LY
LZ
Avr_
<
IV
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL FOR THE PUGET SOUND BASIN
Figure III -2.1 - Nomograph for Sizing Circular Drains Flowing Full
1000
900
800 .0001
700 2.0
600 .000,2
500 Minimum
0003 Allowable
400 ,00040001 Velocity
300 .0��� (Flowing 3.0
120
.0008 J5-.0002 Full )
108 p .001
c x,0003
200 96 a 0004
90 c .002-4--.0005-4.0
84
0006 �'+x
78 p .003- 0008
72 w
66 w 005.001 5.0
CA.
60 .006 �-
90 `54 —100 O .008 x,002 o p
80 48 .01 � �i w 6.0
70 w , 003' W.42
vi 60U ,0 00'5 p w 7.0
LL: Z 36 006 w a.
50 -
U Z 33 M 03' .008 a w 8.0
Z -30 a 27 . '�" r05 � � ... w
40 w 04 010 w
w �, � Z 9.0
Q p 2 ' " ,,, 06 .08 020 >- 10.0
x 30
U Cr ,• .030 U
18
20 1 .040. w -
w
g 050 >
080
.. .100
9 SAMPLE USE
8
7 8 24" dia. CMP @ 2% slope yields --20.0
6 17cfs @ 5.2 FPS velocity
(n = 0.024)
6 6
4 Values per Mannings Equation
Q= (1.49 ) AR :h s
3 n 0 30.0
's This table can be converted
✓ to other "n" values by applying
2 formula:
f'40.0
01 ni
02 � n2
1 1
III -2-8 FEBRUARY, 1992
Page 37 of 43
r
u
h
4
S 11 p wvn tngoneenng
Planning
bneer of
V n
Job
— — Landscape Architecture
�� I
Project ZZLI1,11
Designed by CJs + Date_ °..
D E S I G N C 0 M
P A N Y
Checked by Date,.
f) I"✓I..,m +,•„�,N' N.•°u' F" �.° "a a' ,md , ,.P
' II'r �na" �' �Ara+"d 9:
(» t % r4-1�
�.+...»
mx" .�.r
m� ..•�''�Y
����, � � '�"a. � e ary •,,,� � �'"7
t rn p�""u.Y�d°' .e'P°8� i.,y rt• 4mw.+x
W �, x�
9w,x .gym °.r+ .»
°.r'" ,d �.
.M
e
r
Page 38 f 43
Seaview Elementary - North side of Drainage Feature
SvR #94015
Date: 06/20/96
Page
Designed by JMG
Checked by _
Q for the six month - 24 hour storm was determined using the hydrograph method and Water Works software.
Q = 0.52 cfs
Determine slope.
S = 0.5%
Assume vegetation will be a grass -legume mixture.
Establish the height of vegetation during the winter and the design depth or flow (Design flow depth must be at
least two inches less than winter grass height.
Winter grass height = 6 in--_
Design flow depth (y) = 3.1 in �- a ; ", /
Determine mannings n.
n = 0.07
Select Swale shape.
Use trapezoidal shape.
Z = 5 :1 side slopes
Calculate bottom width (b).
b = Qn/(1.486y^1.667sA0.5) - Zy
b = 2.02 ft
Calculate the top width (t).
t=b+2yZ `
t = 4.60 ft
Calculate the cross sectional area (A),
A = by + Zy^2
A= 0.85 sq ft
S V
l vq Engineering
Sheet of m, mm,mm
— —
—
•Planning
Landscape Architecture
Jeb #
Project �YN ' ° •— 'r,.�
Designed by !� Dale JZ ", „ 9
D E S I
G N
C O M P A N Y
Checked by Date._
22,
asci
's3
+w a
Alt #1 Play Fields (south "
"1/2 of Asphalt Pkg Area"
k E r^
Note says "1.4ft",
should actually be
y
1' 4"
1
Nr �Wd,
2.
Swale is designed to convey the 100 -year
stor event. Q(100) from parking lot is 0.23cfs;
Q(100) from developed field is 1.26 cfs (per
Table 3-1) for a total flow of 1.54 cfs. Swale
capacity is 2.05 cfs (see appendix E)
��
Seaview Elementary - South side of Drainage Feature
SvR #94015
Date: 06/20/96
Page
Designed by JMG
Checked by _
Q for the six month - 24 hour storm was determined using the hydrograph method and Water Works software.
Q = 1.19 cfs
Determine slope.
S = 1.0%
Assume vegetation will be a grass-legume mixture.
Establish the height of vegetation during the winter and the design depth or flow (Design flow depth must be at
least two inches less than winter grass height.
Winter grass height = 6 in
Design flow depth (y) = 4 in
Determine mannings n.
n = 0.07
Select Swale shape.
Use trapezoidal shape.
Z = 5 :1 side slopes
Calculate bottom width (b).
b = Qn/(1.486y^1.667s^0.5) - Zy
b = 1.83 ft
Calculate the top width (t).
t=b+2yZ
t = 5.17 ft
Calculate the cross sectional area (A).
A = by + Zy^2
A = 1.17 sq ft
6/19/96 2:47:37 pm SvR Design Company page 1
BASIN SUMMARY
BASIN ID: nplay10
NAME: north
side of AC
play area
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
0.66 Acres
BASEFLOWS:
0.00 cfs
RAINFALL TYPE....:
TYPEIA
PERV
IMP
PRECIPITATION....:
3.00 inches
AREA..:
0.42 Acres
0.24 Acres
TIME INTERVAL....:
10.00 min
ICN....: 86.00
97.00
TC.....
5.00 min
5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF:
0.20
TcReach - Sheet
L: 18.00 ns:0.1500
p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.31
cfs VOL: 0.11
Ac -ft TIME:
490 min
BASIN ID: splay100
SCS METHODOLOGY
TOTAL AREA.......:
RAINFALL TYPE....:
PRECIPITATION....:
TIME INTERVAL....:
NAME: south side of AC play area
0.59 Acres BASEFLOWS: 0.00 cfs
TYPEIA PERV
3.00 inches AREA..: 0.36 Acres
10.00 min CN....: 86.00
TC..... 5.00 min
ABSTRACTION COEFF: 0.20
TcReach - Sheet L: 18.00 ns:0.1500 p2yr: 1.50 s:0.1600
PEAK RATE: 0.28 cfs VOL: 0.10 Ac -ft TIME: 490 min
IMP
0.23 Acres
97.00
5.00 min
❑ 111111D❑❑❑❑❑ ❑
mLUE=®1111m®1111 E® ®EUDHIMITUTIT1,1,11,1f®=11®®0® 11
Appended on: 08:11:38 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Existing (East) Event Summary
Event Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (firs),Ilyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) [Method,Raintype
2 year
0.0982
8.17
I 0.0616
1.3200
SBUH
TYPEIA
10 year
0.2716
8.17
0.1368
1.3200
SBUH
TYPEIA
25 year
0.3805
8.17
0.1829
1.3200
SBUH
TYPE1A
50 year
0.4256
8.17
0.2019
11.3200
1 SBUH
TYPEIA
100 year
0.5178
8.17
0.2406
1.3200
SBUH
TYPEIA
Record Id: Existing (East)
IDesign Method
SBUH
Rainfall type
TYPEIA
jd Intv
1 10.00 min
(Peaking Factor
484.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
IPervious Area (AMC 2)
1.32 ac
DCIA
0.00 ac
IPervious CN
86.00
IDC CN
0.00
Pervious ,r
23.52 min
IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description
SubArea
Sub cn
Open spaces, lawns,parks (>75% grass)
I 1.32 ac
86.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
86.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type
Description Length
Fslope [coeff Imisc I f T
Short prairie grass and lawns.: 186.00
1.50% U500
2.00
22.84
�Sheet
10.15ft:in
min
Channel
Other streams, man-made 461.00
100% 0M00
O�67
(cont)
channels and pipe ft
min
23.52
Pervious TC
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:26:34 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Existing (West) Event Summary
Event IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) jHyd Vol (acft) (Area (ac) IMethod Raintype
2 year
0.0895 !
8.17
0.0602
11.2900
1 SBUH
TYPElA
10 year
0.2506
8.17
0.1337
1.2900
SBUH
TYPElA
25 year
0.3522
8.17
0.1787
1.2900
SBUH
TYPElA
50 year
0.3943
8.17
0.1973
1.2900
SBUH
;TYPElA
100 year
0.4804
8.17
0.2351
1.2900
SBUH
TYPEIA
Record Id: Existing (West)
Design Method SBUH IRainfall type
TYPElA
Hyd Intv 10.00 min IPeaking Factor
484.00
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2) 1.29 ac i CIA
0.00 ac
(Pervious CN 86.00 IDC CN
0.00
Pervious TC 28.11 min IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea
Sub cn
Open spaces; lawns,parks (>75% grass) 1.29 ac
86.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
86.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type Description I Length Slope Coeff [ Misc TT
Short prairie grass and lawns.: 238.00 2000 27.82
1Sheet 1.50% X0.1500
0.15 n
mill
Cl anne]Other strcanis, man-made 1.97.00 2.00%
0.29
.0.0100
(cont) channels and pipe 1t
inir
Pervious TC
28.11
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:26:57 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Proposed (Central) Event Summary
Event Peak Q (cfs) Peak T (hers) flyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method 11aintype
2 year I
0.1736
8.00
1 0.0774
1.6600
SBUH
TYPElA
10 year
0.4668
8.00
0.1720
1.6600
SBUH
TYPElA
25 year I
0.6498 I
8.00
0.2300
1.6600
SBUH
TYPElA
50 year
0.7253
8.00
0.2538
1.6600
SBUH
TYPElA
100 year
0.8795
8.00
0.3025
1.6600
SBUH
TYPElA
Record Id: Proposed (Central)
Design Method
jHyd Intv
(Pervious Area (AMC 2)
Pervious CN
(Pervious TC
Type
Sheet
(Channel
(cont)
Channel
(cont)
SBUH
Rainfall type
10.00 min
IPeaking Factor
Calc
(Abstraction Coeff
1.66 ac
IDCIA
86.00
IDC CN
4.85 min
IDC TC
Pervious CN Calc
TYPElA
484.00
0.20
0.00 ac
0.00
0.00 min
Description SubArea Sub cn
Open spaces, lawns,parks (>75% grass) 1.66 ac 86.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2) 86.00
Pervious TC
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
TT
31.84
rain
0.86
rni.n
0,15
min
4.85
min
Pervious TC
Calc
Description
Length Slope Coeff Misc
Short prairie grass and lawns.:
20,.00 ft
1.50% 0.1500 2.00
0.15
to
IOther streams, man-made
417.00
1.00%0.0100
chajmels aiid pipe
11
Other streams, man-made
1.04.00
2,00%n 0.0100
channels and pipe
fl
Pervious TC
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
TT
31.84
rain
0.86
rni.n
0,15
min
4.85
min
Appended on: 08:27:16 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Proposed (East) Event Summary
Event Peak Q (cfs),Peak T (tars) 144yd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method, �Raintype
2 year
0.0407
8.17
0.0242
0.5200
SBUH
TYPEIA
10 year
0.1114
8.17
0.0539
10.5200
SBUH
TYPElA
25 year
0.1557
8.17
0.0720
10.5200
1 SBUH
TYPElA
50 year
0.1741
8.17
0.0795
0.5200
SBUH
TYPEIA
100 year
0.2115
8.17
0.0948
0.5200
SBUH
TYPElA
Record Id: Proposed (East)
(Design Method
jHyd Intv
IPervious Area (AMC 2)
IPervious CN
IPervious TC
Type
�Sheet
Clutimel
(cont
SBUH IRainfall type
10.00 min (Peaking Factor
(Abstraction Coeff
0.52 ac DCIA
86.00 DC CN
20.21 min 'DC TC
Pervious CN Calc
SubArea Sub en
0.52 ac 86.00
86.00
TYPE lA
484.00
0.20
0.00 ac
0.00
0.00 min
Description
Open spaces, lawns,parks (>75% grass)
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
Pervious TC Calc
Description Length[Slope[Coeff [c TT
(0.15
Short prairie grass and lawns.: 153.00 1 00"_ 0 ' ] 19.54
.5 7o . 1500 1
17t I ' �2.06
Jn jmn
Other streams, man-made 46:1.00 2,00% 0,0100 0.67
channels and pipe ft min
Pervious TC 20.21
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:13:30 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Proposed (West) Event Summary
f j
Event Peak Q (els) Peak T (hrs) 'Hyd Vol (aeft) Area (ac) Method Raintype
2 year
0.0312 I
8.17
0.0196
0.4200
SBUH
'TYPE 1A
10 year
0.0864 I
8.17
0.0435
0.4200
[SBUH
ITYPEIA
25 year
0.1211
8.17
I 0.0582
0.4200
SBUH
TYPEIA
50 year
0.1354
8.17
0.0642
0.4200
SBUH
'TYPEIA
100 year
0.1647
8.17
0.0765
0.4200
SBUH
TYPElA
Record Id: Proposed (West)
IDesign Method SBUH IRainfall type
jHyd Intv 10.00 min IPeaking Factor
IPervious Area (AMC 2)
(Pervious CN
(Pervious TC
(Abstraction Coeff
0.42 ac JDCIA
86.00 IDC CN
1 23.52 min IDC TC
Pervious CN Calc
TYPE lA
484.00
0.20
0.00 ac
0.00
0.00 min
Description SubArea Sub en
Open spaces, lawns,parks (>75% grass) 0.42 ac 86.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2) 86.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type Description Length Fs -lope Fc-oeff Fm-isc I _TT
Sheet Short prairie grass and lawns.: 190,00 �1.50% OJ500 2.00 23,24 0.15 ft in inin
Cliaiiiiel Other streanis, man-made 897.00 2.010% 0.0100 019
(cont) Ieliannels and pipe ft 111111
Pervious TC 23.52
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Table 1: Existing Conditions Resultsl
Ligkjga ted l c ens gr 2015 for F_Iyo
Proposed Conditions
SRI
Precipitation Volume: Edmonds, WA
2 -yr, 24 -hr
1.60 in
10 -yr, 24 -hr
2.50 in
25 -yr, 24 -hr
3.00 in
100 -yr, 24 -hr
3.60 in
The proposed improvements to the playfield include the addition of an underdrain system to
collect runoff from the field. These improvements, as described in the Seaview Playfield
Drainage Study, cause the peak flow from the playfield to increase by 04-3:70.194 cfs (from
0-4:760.733 cfs in the existing condition to Q-4-1-30,927 cfs, in the proposed condition) for the 25-
year event.-
The proposed improvements are limited to the playfield. Therefore, all of the other sub -basins
remain the same as the existing conditions.
When run through StormShed, the model for the proposed conditions produced a total peak
flow of 2-4623.522 cfs for the 25 -year event (Table 2). This flow would have a normal depth of
0-690.78 feet, or less than WY2-inch deeper than the existing flow, in the 15 -inch CMP just
upstream of the point of compliance structure CB 5-417.
TWINAMIN-111IT11
Table 2: Proposed Conditions Results' -
T ble jpd ted! orarnbt - 0 Qr 1091 LO—U ,
Sao
Precipitation Volume: Edmonds, WA
2 -yr, 24 -hr 1.60 in
10 -yr, 24 -hr 2.50 in
25 -yr, 24 -hr 3.00 in
100 -yr, 24 -hr 3.60 in
Model Inputs and Assumptions
• Project Precipitation Values (in inches) taken from WSDOT 24-hour Isopluvial Map
• Existing drain pipe slope of 2.00/6 A dote o 440/0 vtqs calculated for the e istio 15-ingLi
i MC uusi method described ,herr Shuster in the review,�a comrn�l kt stl
of 2% was used to be c nser at v )
• Proposed underdrain slope of 1.0%
• Residential areas modeled as: "Residential districts —1 /3 acre"
• Soils are Hydrologic Soil Group
• See StormShed reports (Attachment 3) for specific basin model inputs
Summary
The addition of the underdrain system at the playfield increased the 25 -year peak flow
approximately 5. 1.555 percent, from 2-.42-553.328 cfs to 2.2623.522 cfs. Proposed peak flow of
2.262152.2 cfs is much less than the 5.32 cfs capacity of the existing 15 -inch CMP upstream of
the point of compliance structure (CS 5-417). Additionally, proposed flows will run at 0.73
feet In the 15 -inch CMP, or te-tn'ust over half full.
As such, the City storm system has adequate capacity to handle the increased runoff resulting
from the proposed playfield improvements.
Attachment 2
Seaview Elem. Playfield
Basin Analysis
Friction Method
Solve For
lf:st0
Capacity of 15" CMP
Manning Formula
Full Flow Capacity
Roughness Coefficient
0.024
ft/s
Channel Slope
0.02000
ft/ft
Normal Depth
1.25
ft
Diameter
1.25
ft
Discharge
4.95
ft3/s
Discharge
4.95
ft/s
Normal Depth
1.25
ft
Flow Area
1.23
ft'
Wetted Perimeter
3.93
ft
Hydraulic Radius
0.31
ft
Top Width
0.00
ft
Critical Depth
0.90
ft
Percent Full
100.0
%
Critical Slope
0.02638
ft/ft
Velocity
4.03
ft/s
Velocity Head
0.25
ft
Specific Energy
1.50
ft
Froude Number
0.00
Maximum Discharge
5.32
ft"/scf
Discharge Full
4.95
ft3/s
Slope Full
0.02000
ft/ft
Flow Type
SubCritical
`%�',` ,lni'%ut',, ,
Downstream Depth 0.00 ft
Length 0.00 ft
Number Of Steps 0
Upstream Depth 0.00 ft
Profile Description
Profile Headloss 0.00 ft
Average End Depth Over Rise 0.00 %
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SolBdafld�P4wMaster V81 (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03]
8/14/2015 10:48:26 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2
Capacity of 15" CMP
WPO W_
Normal Depth Over Rise
100.00
%
Downstream Velocity
Infinity
ft/s
Upstream Velocity
Infinity
ft/s
Normal Depth
1.25
ft
Critical Depth
0.90
ft
Channel Slope
0.02000
ft/ft
Critical Slope
0.02638
ft/ft
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SOIBdatl Master V81 (SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03]
8/14/201510:48:26 AM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2
Appended on: 08:14:13 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin A Event Summary
_ ___--------- ..,
Attachment 3
Seaview Elem. Playfield
Basin Analysis
Event
IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) jHyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method Raintype
2 year
0.0333 8.17 0.0294
0.9600 SBUH TYPEIA
10 year
0.1429 8.17 0.0754
1 0.9600 SBUH TYPElA
25 year
0.2185
8.00 0.1051
10.9600 SBUH TYPElA
100 year,
0.3201 8.00 0.1432
0.9600 SBUH TYPEIA
Record Id: Basin A
Design Method
SBUH
(Rainfall type
TYPElA
jHyd Intv
10.00 min
IPeaking Factor
484.00
Pervious
TC Calc
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2)
0.96 ac
IDCIA
0.00 ac
Pervious CN
81.00
DC CN
0.00
Pervious TC
15.19 min
DC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Sinooth Surfaces.: 0.011
Type
Sheet
Sheet
Channel
(interin)
Description
SubArea Sub cn
Residential districts - 1/3 acre
0.96 ac 81.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
81.00
Pervious
TC Calc
Description
Length
Slope Coeff Misc TT
(Short prairie grass and
110.00 ft
5.00%
0.1500
[1.60 10.37
lawns.: 0.15
n ni in
Sinooth Surfaces.: 0.011
95.00 ft
4.00%0.0110 1.60 1.25 min
Concrete pipe (n=0.012)
f1.00
[2.00,7t290
0.0120 3.58 min
Pervious TC
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
15.19
min
Appended on: 08:14:50 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin B Event Summary
Event IPeak Q (cfs) (Peak T (hrs) IHyd Vol (acft) (Area (ac) method Raintype
2 year
0.0291
9.17
0.0319
1.0400
SBUH
TYPElA
10 vear
0.1091
8.50
0.0817
1.0400
SBUH
TYPE 1 A
=25year
0.1666
8.17
0.1138
1.0400
'SBUH
TYPElA
100 year
0.2459
8.17
0.1551
1.0400
SBUH
TYPElA
Record Id: Basin B
(Design Method
SBUH
(Rainfall type TYPElA
jHyd Intv
10.00 min
(Peaking Factor 484.00
Abstraction Coeff 0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2) 1.04 ac
JDCIA 0.00 ac
Pervious CN
81.00
DC CN 0.00
(Pervious TC
42.32 min
DC TC 0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description
SubArea Sub cn
Residential districts - 1/3 acre
1.04 ac 81.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2) 81.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type
Description
Length Slope Coeff Misc TT
Short prairie grass and
110.00
1 60 14.95
Sheet
lawns.: 0.15
ft
.00500
2 %
0.1
in min
Short prairie grass and
330.00
0/.00
[5-
1.60 2496
Sheet
(lawns.: 0.15
't;
0.1500
in rvr v n
Channel
Conca-cte pipe (n=0.012)
865.00 2.00%0.01211 140 min
(interni)
It
Pervious TC
42.32
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:17:41 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
FIELD Event Summary
Event jPeak Q (cfs) jPeak T (hrs) jHyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method Raintype
2 year 0.1878 8.17 0.1212 2.6000 SBUH TYPE 1 A
10 e4'0.5222 8.17 0.2694 2.6000 SBUH TYPElA
F2 5 year 0.7327 8.17 0.3602 2.6000 SBUH TYPElA
100 year 0.9980 8.17 0.4738 2.6000 SBUH TYPEIA
Record Id: FIELD
(Design Method SBUH lRainfall type TYPElA
(Hyd Intv 10.00 min (Peaking Factor 484.00
Abstraction Coeff 0.20
(Pervious Area (AMC 2) 1 2.60 ac JDCIA 0.00 ac
Pervious CN 86.00 JDC CN 0.00
Pervious TC 25.44 min [DC TC 0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea Sub cn
Open spaces, lawns,parks (>75% grass) I 2.60 ac 86.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2) 86.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type Description Length Slope Coeff [Misc TT
Carmel Other streams, man-made 460.00 _F2_
00% 0.0100 0.67
cant channels and pipe ft I min
Sheet
Short Prairie grass and lawns.: 179.00 1.50 % 0.1500 1.60 24.77
11.15 ft m min
Pervious TC 25.44
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:15:07 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin C Event Summary
Event IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) Hyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) IMethod Raintype
2 year 0.5431 8.00 0.1815 1.5800 SBUH TYPElA
10 year 0.8817 8.00 0.2989 1.5800 SBUH 1TYPEIA
L25 year 1.0680 8.00 0.3645 1.5800 SBUH ITYPEIA
100 year 1.2905 8.00 0.4432 1.5800 SBUH 'TYPElA
Record Id: Basin C
(Design Method
ISBUH (Rainfall type
TYPElA
(Hyd Intv
1 10.00 min (Peaking Factor I
484.00
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2)
1.58 ac JDCIA
0.00 ac
Pervious CN
98.00 IDC CN
0.00
Pervious TC
6.20 min IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea
Sub cn
Impervious surfaces (pavements, roofs, etc) I 1.58 ac
98.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
98.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type Description Length Slope Coeff Misc TT
(Sheet Stnoot h Surfaces.: 0.011 1200.00 ft 2.00% 0.0110 1.60 in 2.98 min
(Channel (interm) IGrassed (n=0.030) 175.00 ft 1.00% 0.0300 F 1.72 min
Channel (interm) Concrete pipe (ii=0,01.2) 542.00 ft 2.00% 0.0120 F 1.50 min
Pervious TC 6.20 min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:15:22 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin D Event Summate
Event IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) jHyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method Raintype
2 year 0.0080 8.00 0.0055 0.1800 SBUH ' TYPE 1 A
10 year 0.0337 8.00 0.0141 0.1800 SBUH TYPEIA
25 year 0.0509 8.00 0.0197 0.1800 SBUH i TYPE 1 A
100 year 0.1732 8.00 0.0269 0.1800 SBUH TYPEIA
Record Id: Basin D
(Design Method I
SBUH
(Rainfall type
TYPElA
(Hyd Intv I
10.00 min
(Peaking Factor
484.00
lawns.: 0.15
(Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2)
0.18 ac
JDCIA
0.00 ac
Pervious CN 1
81.00
IDC CN
0.00
(Pervious TC I
4.05 min
IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description
SubArea
Sub cn
Residential districts -
1/3 acre
0.18 ac
81.00
Pervious Composited CN
(AMC 2)
81.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type
Description
I Length Slope Coeff Misc
F TT
Sheet
Short prairie grass and
F5O.00 ft 25.00% 0.1500 1.60
2.90
lawns.: 0.15
do
nein
Channel
415.00
1.15
Concrete pipe (n=0.012)
ft [2.000/ [0.0120
min
intern
4.05
Pervious TC
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:15:50 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin E Event Summary
Event IPeak Q (cfs)'Peak T (hrs)'Hyd Vol (acft) (Area (ac) Method'Raintype
2 year
0.0143
8.17
0.0126
0.4100
SBUH
;TYPE 1 A
10 year
0.0611
8.17
0.0322
0.4100
'SBUH
TYPElA
25 year
0.0935
8.00
0.0449
0.4100
SBUH
TYPElA
100 year `
0.1370
8.00
0.0611
0.4100
SBUH
TYPEIA
Record Id: Basin E
(Design Method
SBUH
IRainfall type
TYPElA
IHyd Intv
10.00 min
IPeaking Factor
484.00
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
(Pervious Area (AMC 2) 0.41 ac
IDCIA
0.00 ac
(Pervious CN
I 81.00
IDC CN
0.00
(Pervious TC
15.09 min
IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description
SubArea
Sub cn
Residential districts - 1/3 acre
0.41 ac
81.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
81.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type
I Description
I Length
Slope
FCoeff
FNfisc TT
S deet
(Short prairie grass and
180.00
6.00%
��
0.1500 1.60 14.29
lawns.: 0.15
ft
in
niia
Channel
Channel
290.00
(intermPervious
(Concrete pipe (n=0.012)
ft
2.00%
0.0120
0.80 min
TC
15.09
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:16:03 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin F Event Summary
Event IPeak Q (cfs) (Peak T (hrs) Hyd Vol (acft) jArea (ac) (Method Raintype
2 year 0.0096
8.17
0.0077
0.2500
SBUH
TYPE I A
10 year 0.0412
8.00
0.0196
0.2500
SBUH
TYPEIA
25 year 0.0633
8.00
0.0274
0.2500
SBUH
TYPElA
100 year 0.0922
8.00
0.0373
0.2500
[SBUH
�TYPElA
Record Id: Basin F
Design Method
IHyd Intv
Pervious Area (AMC 2)
Pervious CN
Pervious TC
SBUH
[Rainfall type
10.00 min
IPeaking Factor
Sheet
(Abstraction Coeff
0.25 ac
IDCIA
81.00
IDC CN
10.34 min
IDC TC
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea
Residential districts - 1/3 acre 0.25 ac
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
Pervious TC Calc
TYPE 1A
484.00
0.20 _
0.00 ac
0.00
0.00 min
Sub cn
81.00
81.00
Type
Description
I Length Slope Coeff rMisc
TT
Sheet
Short pra irte grass and
lawns.: (D 15
120.00 [7.000, 0.15001.60
ftin
9.71 min
Channel
Charm)
Concrete pipe (n=0.012)
225.00
2 12.00% 0.0120
0.62 min
(interPervious
10.34
TC
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:16:15 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin G Event Summary
Event
IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) Hyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method Raintype
2 year
0.0265
8.50
0.0245
0.8000
SBUH
TYPElA
10year
0.1147
8.17
0.0628
0.8000
I SBUH
TYPEIA
L-T5year�0.747
8.17
0.0876
0.8000
SBUH
TYPElA
100 year
0.2530
8.17
0.1193
0.8000
SBUH
TYPEIA
Record Id: Basin G
Design Method
SBUH
IRainfall type
TYPElA
Hyd Intv
10.00 min
IPeaking Factor
484.00
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2) I 0.80 ac
IDCIA
0.00 ac
Pervious CN
81.00
IDC CN
0.00
Pervious TC
18.03 min
IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description
SubArea
Sub cn
Residential districts - 1/3 acre
0.80 ac
81.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
81.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type
Description
Length Slope Coeff Misc TT
Short prairie grass and
265 [7509,,,
[in.0060 17.81
Sheet
lawns.: 0.15
0.1500
ft
ruin
Channel
(intern)
Concrete pipe (n=0.012)
80.00 ft 2.00% 0.0120
0.22 min
Pervious TC
18.03
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:16:57 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin H Event Summary
Event
IPeak Q (cfs) IPeak T (hrs) jHyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) Method FRaintype
2 year
I 0.0959 I
10.17
1 0.1243 4.8700
SBUH TYPElA
10 year
0.4045
8.67
0.3398 4.8700
SBUH TYPElA
25 year
0.6410
8.50
0.4823 4.8700
SBUH TYPElA
;100 year
0.9604
8.50
0.6672 4.8700
SBUH TYPElA
Record Id: Basin H
Design Method
IHyd Intv
Pervious Area (AMC 2)
Pervious CN
Pervious TC
Type
(Sheet
Cliari el,
(i r� terr�n)
SBUH
Rainfall type
TYPElA
10.00 min
Factor
484.00
Abstraction Coeff
0.20
4.87 ac
IDCIA
0.00 ac
79.00
IDC CN
0.00
46.85 min
IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea Sub cn
Residential districts - 1 acre 4.87 ac 79.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2) 79.00
Pervious TC Calc
Description LengthSlope Coeff Misc TT
Short prairie grass and 710.00 5.00% [0-
.15001.60 46.08
lawns.: 0.15 ft �in arnin
Concrete pipe (n=0.0 12) 280.00 2.00% 0.0120 � OM78 min
Pervious TC 46.85
min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
Appended on: 08:17:09 Wednesday, November 11, 2015
Basin I Event Summary
Event
IPeak Q (cfs) (Peak T (hrs) ,Hyd Vol (acft) Area (ac) I ethod `Raintype
2 year
0.0182
8.17
0.0162
0.5300
SBUH
;TYPEIA'
10 year
, 0.0783
8.17
0.0416
0.5300
SBUH
;TYPEIA
25 year 0.1192
L
8.00
0.0580
0.5300
SBUH
TYPEIA
100 year
0.1747
8.00
0.0790
0.5300
1 SBUH
ITYPEIA
Record Id: Basin I
Design Method SBUH Rainfall type
TYPEIA
Hyd Intv 10.00 min Peaking Factor
484.00
(Abstraction Coeff
0.20
Pervious Area (AMC 2) I 0.53 ac IDCIA
0.00 ac
IPervious CN 81.00 IDC CN
0.00
IPervious TC 15.75 min IDC TC
0.00 min
Pervious CN Calc
Description SubArea
Sub cn
Residential districts - 1/3 acre 0.53 ac
81.00
Pervious Composited CN (AMC 2)
81.00
Pervious TC Calc
Type Description Length Slope Coeff Misc TT
Sheet sliort praiHe grass, and lawns.: 0.15 166.00 ft 4.00°Io 0.1500 1.60 in 15.75 min
Pervious TC
15.75 min
Licensed to: KPFF Inc.
H ["'l L]L- i HI IIJ HHI I Il H'.flu' 14"'T'If i
oil 0 mill 1 111 III■ ■'■111111111 III■1111111111 ■I■111■■■111111.■■111111 0■W■0■111 ■■■■11111111111111111000
■■■■■■111111■
x
n
❑ ❑❑®❑ ® ® ODM® BEIRDH® IM0❑❑® ® m ❑L= m❑❑®®❑m
❑ ❑❑❑❑❑❑ HIM ❑
Seaview Playf e d - Exiist na Swale
Friction Method
Manning Formula
Solve For
Discharge
Ihptot Data .
Roughness Coefficient
0.350
Channel Slope
0.01000
ft/ft
Normal Depth
1.00
ft
Left Side Slope
5.00
ft/ft (H:V)
Right Side Slope
5.00
ft/ft (H:V)
Bottom Width
2.00
ft
f1tesiults
Discharge
2.05
ft'/s
Flow Area
7.00
ftz
Wetted Perimeter
12.20
ft
Hydraulic Radius
0.57
ft
Top Width
12.00
ft
Critical Depth
0.26
ft
Critical Slope
3.18308
ft/ft
Velocity
0.29
ft/s
Velocity Head
0.00
ft
Specific Energy
1.00
ft
Froude Number
0.07
Flow Type
Subcritical
Downstream Depth
0.00
ft
Length
0.00
ft
Number Of Steps
0
Upstream Depth
0.00
ft
Profile Description
Profile Headloss
0.00
ft
Downstream Velocity
Infinity
ft/s
Upstream Velocity
Infinity
ft/s
Normal Depth
1.00
ft
Critical Depth
0.26
ft
Channel Slope
0.01000
ft/ft
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods SoIB8addp~Master V81(SELECTseries 1) [08.11.01.03]
11/16/2015 5:4:26 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 1 of 2
Seaview Playfl'eld - Existing Swale
VF, Ut,Dstal
Critical Slope
3.18308 ft/ft
Bentley Systems, Inc. Haestad Methods Sol lloO Master V81(SELECTserles 1) [08.11.01.03]
1111612015 5:44:26 PM 27 Siemons Company Drive Suite 200 W Watertown, CT 06795 USA +1-203-755-1666 Page 2 of 2