Loading...
Hwy 99 Edmonds - Civil ENGINEERING Comment Response Letter_190521.pdfNAVIX -i I r i May 21, 2019 JoAnne Zulauf Engineering Technician City of Edmonds 121 5th Ave N Edmonds, WA 98020 Subject: GRE Edmonds, LLC; Edmonds, Washington Permit #BLD20181622 Comment Response 23400 Highway 99, Edmonds, WA 98020 JoAnne, 11235 s.e. 6th street, suite 150 t 425.453.9501 bellevue, wa 98004 f 425.453.8208 navixeng.com a info@navixeng.com Thank you for the review of the GRE Edmonds, LLC permit submittal. We have received the review comments, dated April 4, 2019, and have revised the submittal documents accordingly. Please see our responses to your comments as indicated below. Genera Provide an itemized engineers cost estimate for both on -site and off -site (right-of-way) improvements, including traffic control and all utility installations. Use the King County Bond Quantity Worksheet (available on the county website) and utilize "write-in" sections where appropriate. a. The amount of the bond will be based on 120% of the City approved estimate for the offsite improvements. b. A 3.3% inspection fee is calculated for the project based on 100% of the City approved estimate for the entire project improvements. Response: An engineer's estimate has been prepared using the King County Bond Quantity Worksheet and is part of this resubmittal package. 2. Please add a note to plans stating "A separate right-of-way construction permit is required for all work within the city right-of-way." Please note, a ROW permit application with contractor's signature shall be provided to the city prior to issuance of civil construction plans. Response: This note is located in the "General Notes" section located on the Cover Sheet, C1.00. Hwy 99 Edmonds —Comment Response Letter_190508doc Page 2 JoAnne Zulauf May 21, 2019 3. Please provide a written response from the geotech that the civil plans are consistent with the geotech report. Response: A written response from the geotechnical engineer will be provided subsequent to the submittal of these plans. 4. Olympic View Water and Sewer District shall have their own approval block on pages specific to their review and approval. The applicant will be required to obtain OVWSD project approval prior to final approval of the civil plans by the City. Response: Olympic View Water and Sewer District is currently reviewing plans and a copy of approved plans will be provided to the City once obtained. Sheet C1.00 Please add Fire District 1 as Fire Prevention and Emergency purveyor. Response: The Fire prevention and emergency purveyor information has been provided on this sheet. 2. Please revise part 1 of the General Construction Notes to the correct year for the APWA/WSDOT. Response: Part 1 of the General Construction Notes has been updated to reflect the correct year. Sheet C2.00 In the southwest corner of the property there is a note #4 that says protect the utility pole and guy wire. On sheet C4.00, Site Plan, there is a note that the pole is to be removed. Please revise sheets to be consistent. Response: Note has been revised to be consistent. The pole is to be relocated and/or removed. Coordination with the telecom companies with infrastructure on this pole is ongoing. 2. Please add a reference to the Tree protection plan in the Landscape plans. Protection measures are to at minimum be referenced on this plan. Response: The tree protection plans have been referenced in Note 4. 3. Add note to plans: Existing sidewalk frontage improvements shall be maintained as long as possible during the course of construction. Response: Note 5 has been added to this sheet to require existing frontage improvements as long as possible during construction. 4. Show stockpile location and indicate requirements to keep it covered. Response: Stockpile location has been added to the TESC plan and a detail for plastic covering has been added to C2.20. Hwy 99 Edmonds - Comment Response Letter-190508doc Page 3 JoAnne Zulauf May 21, 2019 5. Add note: Install and maintain all TESC measures according to approved plans, City of Edmonds standard details, and all other measures that may be required during construction. Response: Note 6 has been added to this sheet. 6. Add note: All disturbed areas to be compost amended per 2014 SWMMWW BMP T.5.13. Response: Note 7 has been added to this sheet. Sheet C4.00 1. Please add a note to the plans that states the painted fogline and centerline will be restriped, as required, prior to project completion. Response: Note 1 has been added to this sheet to require the fog line and center line restriping prior to project completion. 2. Add note to plans: Utility patches with less than 20-feet of separation shall be combined and full width or half width overlay will be required depending on the extent of disturbance. Where utility patches fall entirely within one travel lane, the overlay shall extend to the centerline of roadway. Where utility patches extend into both travel lanes then a full width overlay is required. Response: Note 2 has been added to this sheet. 3. Please add note regarding #8 (sawcut), "Sawcut to be determined by the engineering inspector" Response: Note 3 has been added to this sheet. 4. As mentioned above, the pole in the southwest corner of the property is noted to be removed on this sheet and retained on the TESC sheet. The call out on the site plan references "note 1" but there is no note 1 on this sheet. Please revise as needed. Response: Note to remove pole is now consistent on each sheet. Sheet C5.00 Please provide additional information regarding the length, slope and location of the ramps on either side of the driveway. This information can be added either on the Site Plan or the Driveway detail. Response: Additional information has been added to detail 1/Sheet G.00 for the ramps. 2. The driveway detail on this sheet shows point elevations of 419.68 at west edge of garage opening and 417.86 at the east edge. It is unclear how the driveway with a cross slope of approximately 9.1 % at the building will transition into the garage where the floor elevation is shown at what appears to be a fairly level 417+ elevation (Sheet G006). Please revise drawings or provide additional information to clarify the plan. Hwy 99 Edmonds - Comment Response Letter-190508doc Page 4 JoAnne Zulauf May 21, 2019 Response: A note has been added to the driveway detail referencing the structural plans. The slab transition will be internal to the building to match civil spot elevations per the driveway detail shown in Detail 1/Sheet C5.00. Sheet C6.00 1. The city shall receive water and sewer plans approved and signed by Olympic View Water and Sewer District prior to the final city engineering review of the project. Response: Approved plans from Olympic View Water and Sewer District will be provided once approval is obtained. Sheet X of X - Traffic Control 1. Please submit a traffic control and haul route plan for review and approval. Individual plans shall be provided for all elements of work to be completed on Highway 99 and 234th. Response: Traffic control and haul route plans have been prepared by the contractor's consultant and are included in this resubmittal. 2. Disruption fees will be charged for closure of parking stalls and sidewalk areas. Clearly specify areas of closure and indicate the approximate timeframe for which you request the closure. Response: Areas of closure and timeframe will be specified on the traffic control plans or other contractor -provided plans and submitted to the City under separate cover. Sheet L1.3 Landscape Plan 1. Please revise matrix to note the Street Tree species as "to be determined by the City Parks Manager" and that it will be 3" caliper with 7 ft branching height. Response: Please see response from the Landscape architect. 2. The traffic on Highway 99 travels at a pretty high speed which means that the easier it is to see pedestrians trying to cross 234th, the safer it is, especially for cars turning up 234th. The plants proposed adjacent to the pedestrian ramp range in height at full growth between 2 ft to 4 ft. The areas with the Spirea and Lavender are of the most concern. Please revise the planting plan with low growing plantings for this area. Response: Please see response from the Landscape architect. Hwy 99 Edmonds - Comment Response Letter-190508doc Page 5 JoAnne Zulauf May 21, 2019 We hope you find the resolution of the review comments acceptable. Please feel free to contact me with any questions or coordination items you have at (425) 458-7900 or ioe@navixeng.com. Sincerely, Joe Taflin, P.E., LEED AP Principal Hwy 99 Edmonds - Comment Response Letter-190508doc