Lamothe.Traffic Impact Worksheet..Approved.5.5.11.pdfJ
City of Edmonds
L eJ=
Traffic Impact Analysis Worksheet
Name of Proposed Project:
Owner/Applicant
Name
P u. 3,;,�_ JoZ.
Street/Mailing Address
F d ✓vm-6Li 1J A
City l State Zip
Telephone: `t L 5) 3 (P f ' / i 5-
Applicant Contact Person:
3e__�
Name
Street/Mailing Address
City
Telephone:
Traffic Engineer who prepared the Traffic Impact Analysis (if applicable):
Firm Name Contact Name
Telephone: E-mail:
THRESHOLD LEVELS OF ANALYSIS
State Zip
Project Traffic Levels Sections to Complete
1. Less than 25 peak -hour trips generated I and 7 only (Worksheet/Checklist)
H. More than 25 peak -hour trips generated All sections
1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
a. Location - Street address:
b. Specify e\isting land use:
3 zy i,4,111, S4_.
0 ,4,,,f_
EkfA-- yeaz(-,
a vicinity map and site plan.)
c. Specify proposed type and size of development:
b UU � �e • d"a (# of residential units and/or square footage of building)
Rodsed on 6124110 B82 - Trn1f1c Impact Analysis Workshee/ Page I of 5
d. Date construction will begin and be completed:
e. Define proposed access locations: fU I A--
f. Define proposed sight distance at site egress locations: A/
2. TRIP GENERATION
Source shall be the Eighth Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
manual. For independent fee calculations, the current edition of the ITE manual may be used.
ADT = Average Daily Traffic
PM Peak -hour trips (AM, noon or school peak may also apply as directed by the City Engineer)
a. Existing Site Trip Generation Table
l PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
b. Proposed Project Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak-1 lour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
c. Net New Project Trip Generation Table:
PM Peak -Hour Trips
Land Use Daily (ADT) IN OUT
d. State assumptions and methodology for internal, link -diverted or passby trips:
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Tra, f e Impact Analysis Worksheel Puge 2 Uf 5
3. TRIP DISTRIBUTION
Prepare and attach a graphic showing project trip distribution percentages and assignments. For
developments that generate over 75 peak -hour trips, the City Engineer reserves the right to require
trip distribution to be determined through use of the City traffic model.'
a. SITE ACCESS ROADWAY/DRIVEWAYS AND SAFETY
a. Have sight distance requirements at egress location been met per AASHTO requirements?
b. Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Analysis:
Intersections to be evaluated shall be determined by the City of Edmonds Traffic Engineer
Existing Conditions LOS Delays
Year of Opening LOS Delays
Five Years Beyond Change of LOS llelays
Land Use
c. Describe channelization warrants:
(Attach striping plan.)
d. Vehicle Storage/Queuing Analysis (calculate 50% and 95 °%v queuing lengths):
50 % 1 95 %
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
Five Years Beyond Change of
Land Use
e. If appropriate, state traffic control warrants (e.g. stop sign warrants, signal warrants):
f. Summarize local accident history2 (only required for access to principal and minor arterials):
' Available upon request at City of Edmonds Development Services Department
z Available upon request at City of Edmonds Police Department
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Traffic ImpactAnalysis ;vor* sheel Page 3 o f 5
5. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Provide the following and other planned development traffic within the city,'
a. Describe existing ADT and peak -hour counts (less than two years old), including turning
movements, on street adjacent to and directly impacted by the project.
b. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, the year the
project is fully open (with and without project traffic).
c. Describe the estimated ADT and peak -hour counts, including turning movements, five years
after the project has been fully open (with and without project traffic).
d. State annual background traffic growth factor and source:
6. LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) ANALYSIS
a. Summarize Level of Service Analysis below and attach supporting LOS analysis documentation.
Provide the following documentation for each arterial street or arterial intersection impacted by
ten or more peak -hour trips. Other City -planned developments' must also be factored into the
LOS calculations.
Existing Conditions
Year of Opening
I,OS I I LOS
Existing Lel�t�-s
With Project. Without Project
Five Years Beyond Change of With Project Without Project
Land Use
b. Note any assumptions/variations to standard analysis default values and justifications:
' A list of planned developments are available at the City ulxfn request for public records
Revised on 6124110 E82 - 7 rafJ1'c Impact Analysis Worksheet Page 4 o, f 5
7. MITIGATION RECOMMENDATIONS
State recommended measures and fees required to mitigate project specific traffic impacts. Traffic
impact fee shall be calculated from the Edmonds Road Impact Fee Rate Study Table 4 (attached)
and as identified in ECDC 18.82.120, except as otherwise provided for independent fee calculations
in ECDC 18.82.130.
1 CHANGE IN USE
(_ Fee for prior use shall be based on fee established at the time the prior use was permitted. If the
previous use was permitted prior to the adoption of Ordinance 3516 (effective date: 09/12/04),
the 2004 ECDC 18.82.120 impact fee shall be used.
ITE Land Use Category
Per Unit
Fee Rate
New Use
M,c.� .a-�, (3u,c�
$ 3 '�
Prior Use
Units in
square feet,
# of dwelling,
of , etc.
X (G U v =
X
Fee
New Use Fee: $ -Z, Z Y Prior Use Fee: $ f 0,f tv:1 = $ i
U NEW DEVELOPMENT
Units in
ITE Land Use Category Per Unit square feet,
Fee Rate # of dwelling,
of , etc.
New Use $ X =
U OTHER
MITIGATION FEE RECOMMENDATION:
INDEPENDENT FEE CALCULATION: $200.00 +consultant fee $
TOTAL TRAFFIC IMPACT FEE 1 $
City of
Division Approval
Date
No impact fees will be due, nor will a credit be given, for an impact fee calculation resulting in a net negative.
Revised on 6124110 E82 - Trafflc Inipaci Analysis Worksheet Page 5 o f 5