Loading...
LL-08-07 Staff Report.pdf CITY OF EDMONDS PLANNING DIVISION REVIEW OF A PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT FILE # LL-08-07 CONTACT PERSON/AGENT Debra Hustler APPLICANTS H. Dean and Debra Hustler PROPERTY OWNERS David and Beth Marriott / H. Dean and Debra Hustler PROPERTY LOCATION 19005 and 18917 Soundview Place PROJECT DESCRIPTION Adjust lot line between two adjacent parcels __________________ A. INTRODUCTION The applicant is proposing to adjust a lot line between two adjacent parcels; Parcel A is identified as 18917 Soundview Place (27031300402200) and Parcel B abuts on the south and is addressed as 19005 Soundview Place (27031300403200). Parcel B (Marriott) is sending 7,813 square feet to Parcel A (Hustler). Both Parcel A and B are currently developed with single family residences. B. ANALYSIS OF DESIGN: 1. Number of Lots Involved: Prior to Lot Line Adjustment - 2; Post Adjustment - 2 2. Lot Area: a. Minimum lot area required for RS-12 zone: 12,000 square feet b. Minimum lot width required for RS-12 zone: 80’ c. Area of each lot (approximate): Existing sf Proposed sf Parcel A (Hustler): 13,560 21,373 Parcel B (Marriott): 22,551 14,738 d. Lot width of each lot: Parcel A – variable from 73’ to 138’; Parcel B – approximately 75’. Parcel B is an existing non-conforming lot with respect to width but the proposed adjustment does not affect that. 3. Topographical Consideration: The proposed lot line adjustment involves sending a plateau area east of a hedge which marks the top of the slope of Fruitdale Creek on the Marriott parcel. The plateau is essentially at the same elevation as the Hustler’s existing parcel and joining it to that parcel is a logical adjustment. 4. Flag Lot Determination: The subject parcels are not considered flag lots. 5. Corner Lot Determination: Neither parcel is considered a corner lot. LL-2008-07 Page 2 of 4 6. Comprehensive Plan: Both lots are defined as Single Family Resource in the Comprehensive Plan and the current proposal appears to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. 7. Zoning Ordinance: The proposal appears to meet the intent of the Zoning Ordinance (ECDC 20.75.050). Both parcels are currently zoned RS-12, Single Family Residential with a 12,000 square foot minimum area requirement. As mentioned previously, both parcels are currently developed with single family residences. Further subdivision of either parcel is not permitted based on the minimum lot area requirements currently in effect. The plat currently indicates that 7,184 square feet will be conveyed. It appears that this is a typographical error since both before/after tables calculate to City of Edmonds Zoning Map, December 14, 2007 7,813 square feet being conveyed. The Marriotts have an existing shed on that portion of land to be conveyed to the Hustlers. The shed currently does not meet the side setback requirement for the zone (10’) on the north. As proposed, it would not meet the side setback from the new property line created by the adjustment on the west. The parties are aware of this and have agreed to remove the shed as part of the lot line adjustment process. 8. Access: No change in access to either parcel is proposed. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT: 1. SEPA Determination: Not required for this proposal. 2. Shoreline Master Program: Exempt from Shoreline Master Program permits. 3. Critical Area Determination: Not required for this proposal. D. REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS AND DEDICATIONS: The Engineering Division has reviewed the application and is not requiring any improvements or dedications. E. DECISION: The proposed lot line adjustment is Approved with the following conditions: 1.Include the lot line adjustment file number LL-2008-0007 on the documents to be recorded. LL-2008-07 Page 3 of 4 2.The shed currently on that portion of the Marriott parcel being conveyed to the Hustler’s shall be removed prior to final approval of the adjustment. A permit from the Building Division must be obtained to complete this work. 3.If included on the final plat, change the ‘Conveyance’ amount to 7,813 square feet rather than 7,184 square feet as listed on the preliminary plat. 4.Make sure all documents to be recorded meet the Snohomish County Auditor’s requirements for recording, including all signatures in black ink. 5.Submit the documents to be recorded to the City of Edmonds’ Planning Division for review prior to recording. Documents must have the city’s approval before they can be recorded. 6.Once the final documents are approved by the City, the applicant must record the approved documents with Snohomish County Auditor’s office. 7.After recording, please provide the City of Edmonds Planning Division with three copies of the recorded documents with the recording number on them. The City will not consider the lot line adjustment to be complete until this is done. F. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Land Use Application 2. Preliminary Lot Line Adjustment Map I have determined that the application is complete and have reviewed the application for lot line adjustment pursuant to Chapters 20.75 and 20.95 of the Edmonds Community Development Code. February 27, 2008 Michael Clugston, Planning Division Date -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PARTIES OF RECORD: Planning Department David & Beth Marriott 19005 Soundview Place Edmonds, WA 98020 H. Dean & Debra Hustler 18917 Soundview Place Edmonds, WA 98020 LL-2008-07 Page 4 of 4 RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION A request for reconsideration or clarification of this decision may be made by filing a letter and fee with the Planning Department within ten (10) working days of the date of decision. THE RIGHT TO APPEAL This decision may be appealed to the Hearing Examiner. In this case, a written letter and other items needed to appeal must be submitted to the Planning Division within fourteen (14) calendar days of the date of decision. Please contact the Planning Division for information. Note that per ECDC 20.105.010.A.2, appeals of lot line adjustments are limited to appeals by the applicant only of a denial of a requested lot line adjustment application. TIME LIMITS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND APPEALS The time limits for reconsiderations and appeals run concurrently. If a request for reconsideration is filed before the time limit for filing an appeal has expired, the time “clock” for filing an appeal is stopped until a decision on the reconsideration request is completed. Once the staff has issued his/her decision on the reconsideration request, the time clock for filing an appeal continues from the point it was stopped. For example, if a request is filed on day 5 of the appeal period, an individual would have 9 more days in which to file an appeal after the staff issues their decision on the reconsideration request. City of Edmonds, Attn.: Planning Division 121 - 5th Avenue North Edmonds, Washington 98020