Loading...
Ordinance 3982 Definition of Lot.pdfORDINANCE NO. 3982 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MODIFY THE DEFINTION OF "LOT" (ECDC 21.55.010), DEFINING "LOT OF RECORD" (ECDC 21.55.015) AND ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR DETERMINING "INNOCENT PURCHASER" (ECDC 20.75.180 AND 20.01.003). WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code has provisions against issuing development permits for lots created outside of the subdivision process; and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code contains no definition of a "lot of record"; and WHEREAS, an "innocent purchaser" may be allowed to develop a lot pursuant to RCW 58.17.210 and ECDC 20.75.180, and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Community Development Code contains no process or criteria for establishing an innocent purchaser, and WHEREAS, the Edmonds Planning Board forwarded a recommendation to the City Council with proposed amendments for definitions of lot, lot of record, and an innocent purchaser process and criteria after a public hearing held on July 23, 2014, and WHEREAS, after considering the Planning Board's recommendation at a public hearing held on September 16, 2014 the City Council finds the proposed amendment in the public interest; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Amendment to, Section 21.55.010 Lot. Section 21.55.010 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, definition of "Lot," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline: deleted text is shown in strike through): Page 1 of 8 21.55.010 Lot. Lot means a single traet of land legally ereated as a .ern ate building site Yit fOH4 fractional part of divided lands havin', fixed botyidarkk ,-Licipg of sufficient area and dimension to meet minimum zoning reouirements for width and area. The term shall include tracts or parcels. For purposes of this code, adjoining lots under common ownership, which were created without subdivision or short subdivision approval from applicable city or county governments, shall be considered as one lot and subject to the regulations contained herein. The terms of this section shall apply regardless of whether the individual adjoining lots meet current zoning requirements. (See also, Comer Lot, Flag Lot, Interior Lot, and Irregular Lot.) Section 2. Amendment to Chapter 21.55 ECDC "L" Terms. A new Section 20.55.015 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, untitled "Lot of record," is hereby added to read as follows (new text is shown in underline): 21.55.015 Lot of record. "Lot of record" means a single tract of land meeting anv one of the criteria listed below. A. Platted lots: 'N -]�+ - 1 . Amu Int —11—e boundaries vVere esfkk-M ]Jell ;n A ri—n—led . .... .. . ....... . . . ...... V -O.. — - L-1- --i""t, V1 milk J'1%4kk. 2. Any lot whose boundaries were estab,lisli in an unrecorded short plat approved y tlie Cit ol'Edrnoiids betweeii July 3, 1956 aricl piarch 214_CqgLLa11 short ►slats were required to be recorded). 3. Anv combination of two or more lots shoring a side lot fine as depicted in the following recorded plats: a. City of Edmonds b. Brackett's First Addition c. Genhart's First Addition d. Kellogg's Plat of Edmonds e. Albert B. Lord's Grandview Addition 4, Aiiy lot established 11 'p lnish Courit5l pawnor to the property's beipg it viexed into the City of Edmonds and: Page 2 of 8 a. whose boundaries were established by transfer of ownership before September 12, 1972, and the lot met all zoninia and subdivision r cJuirements in effect at the time of its creation. b. whose boundaries were established between Auust 19 1969mand September 12. 1972 by county approved short plat but not recorded µµwith the County Auditor's Office. c. whose boundaries wereestablishedon or after September 12; µµ1972wby county approved and recorded short plat. d. whose boundaries were established by county approved and recorded formal plat. B. Unplatted lots: 1. Lots created by deed nriorto July 3. 1 1956 2. Lots created through court order, will and testament. or other processlisted as exeniv lr oun l mlat L", , recluirenments by RCW 58.17.035 A 17,040 or t[WoUgh an exemption fromplattjp &Legulations provided byµ law at the Gine of creation of the parcel. 3. Lots that have been rnize i. throtigh a 1 reviomms lot detlerininatim reviewas legal lots. Section 3. Amendment to Section 20.75.180 Violation - Permits. Section 20.75.180 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Violation - Permits," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline; deleted text is shown in strike t retirt"): 20.75.180 Violation permits Development of Lots Not Divided According to this Chapter. No building permit, septic tank permit or other development permit, shall be issued for any lot 4-fac4-(mgr-Marce , f-Ia, j c-liv%c,1 1.in-yi latitm� - tlmm cl alt mrmle s�lpl 11 t � t r -sty 1a�r=n��i-l�;s�al�le�--tyre`-harr-rmg-�zn�i���--ambt-ai.a+d'..,r�.vm�alimr� frmlae�iac�ar-r a�ra�nim�er-timet t�mr�rrbli rmmt�=m=:�t�--1-1-1���m�ars�l�mL-`1�t�l-�tlrl����ruvieleh�vev�,..-tl��rlmihiticmn c�r�ataiecl-r n -t l"mmi:e+�m�l�al�rmemt-aaPl�ly-to-ami-n r-mc��;ct-l�rrrhase�=l�:om��al�;rwtl�o��tl--nc�t+ unless: 1 the subiect prom r is a lot of record as defined in 21.55015: or 21 the property owner is determmrl fined to be an innocent l trrchascr mrm accordance with 20,75.180.A. Where this s ctiop Page 3 of 8 authorizes a lot to be developed even though sucli lot does not �ITmeet the defilij tion for "lot of record" in 21.55.015,. -ail r development on said lot shall com-DIV with the Citv's develomt developinent reguj� atimis regardi, on-conforinitia lots. A, "Lot of record" status for fimocent urcliasei-s, An owner o L)ijja Obtain "lot of'record" status R)r a pareel LhaL.does not meet the "lot of record" definition. To obtain this status, the applicLji� davit with stifflicient.st)12 .. .­ 122 LjIltist submit aii an,,,, i documentation to demonstrate that: The (, u)_I'P MY ippLlic�Lqt did not have actual pots e 1� r i,%,w (lie subdivision of (Iiq in question. If the qpp&ant had knowledge of the subdivision (e.g. knowledge that t��)ar�q , Lsin guestion wcrc.j�n of the same parcell 11 not of its Mealit y. tile itmoccpt purcliaUs y se Statnia ot be granted, . . . ....... . ........... . . __I f (lie pa! 1 Thc Iq�,2CMI:_iCc -cel is consistent witli an arm's letiggh tran��qq�lolv �4�,Lp - LIK9L TliP Owner%j" pias L tju- —hase the pro -e -t Re 4. At the time Of PUrebase- there was some existing deed. record or survey showing IT .................. the subiect parcel as a separate lot: and 5. The parcel had a separate tax ID parcel number prior to the purchase of the property by the qpplicant. B. The innocent Durchaser status may be approved subiect to condi(ions Of anDroval reogiring the appficatit to make itn')rovernetits to the p o ert v that likellaave been required by the city bad theµocrt been rpqerly sL . _�&,,unless it is determined that such improvements have already been constructed. - a A " , oatuj� 1311"Al tAl C Aii nffjrrnatjV- of j"no lot of --o-A" a+- A-11 1— I — W, — cetit lv� recorded with the county auditor. Section 4. Ari endment to Section 20.01.003 Permit type and decision framework. Section 20.01.003 of the Edmonds Community Development Code, entitled "Permit type and decision framework," is hereby amended to read as follows (new text is shown in underline): Page 4 of 8 20.01.003 Permit type and decision framework. A. Permit Types. TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III -A TYPE III -B TYPE IV -A TYPE IV -B TYPE V Zoning compliance Accessory Outdoor dining Essential public Final formal plats Site specific Development letter dwelling unit facilities rezone agreements Lot line adjustment Formal Technological Design review Final planned Zoning text interpretation of impracticality (where public residential amendment; area - the text of the waiver for amateur hearing by development wide zoning map ECDC by the radio antennas architectural amendments director design board is required) ..... _..... Critical area ........ SEPA Shoreline Comprehensive determinations determinations substantial plan amendments development, shoreline conditional use, shoreline variance Shoreline Preliminary short Conditional use Annexations Exemptions plat permits (where public hearing by hearing examiner is required) Minor amendments Land Variances Development to planned clearing/grading regulations residential development Minor preliminary Revisions to Home occupation plat amendment shoreline I permit (where management public hearing by permits hearing examiner is required) Staff design Administrative _ Preliminary formal review, including variances plat signs Final short plat Land use permit Preliminary extension requests planned residential development Sales office/model Guest house (ECDC 17.70.005) Innocent Purchaser Determination Page 5 of 8 B. Decision Table. Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. r1Pl')1.:I): MAYOR DAVID O. EARLING l ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : CI' IL,ERK, SC')`I l SSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Page 6 of 8 PROCEDURE FOR DEVELOPMENT PROJECT PERMIT APPLICATIONS (TYPE I — IV) LEGISLATIVE TYPE I TYPE II TYPE III -A TYPE III -B TYPE IV -A TYPE IV -B TYPE V Recommendation N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Planning board Planning board by: Final decision by: Director Director Hearing Hearing City council City council City council examiner examiner/ADB Notice of No m Yes Yes w Yes Yes Yes No application: Open record No Only if Yes, before Yes, before No Yes, before Yes, before public hearing or appealed, open hearing hearing planning board planning board open record record hearing examiner to examiner or which makes which makes appeal of a final before hearing render final board to render recommendation recommendation decision: examiner decision final decision to council to council or council could hold its own hearing Closed record No No No Yes, before the No Yes, before the review: council council Judicial appeal: Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Section 5. Severability. If any section, subsection, clause, sentence, or phrase of this ordinance should be held invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 6. Effective Date. This ordinance, being an exercise of a power specifically delegated to the City legislative body, is not subject to referendum and shall take effect five (5) days after passage and publication of an approved summary thereof consisting of the title. r1Pl')1.:I): MAYOR DAVID O. EARLING l ATTEST/AUTHENTICATED : CI' IL,ERK, SC')`I l SSEY APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY: Page 6 of 8 BY .. JEFFREY B. TA[ADAY, CITY ATTORNEY FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK: November 14, 2014 PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL: November 18, 2014 PUBLISHED: November 23, 2014 EFFECTIVE DATE: November 28, 2014 ORDINANCE NO. 3982 Page 7 of 8 SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE NO. 3982 of the City of Edmonds, Washington On the 18th day of November, 2014, the City Council of the City of Edmonds, passed Ordinance No. 3982. A summary of the content of said ordinance, consisting of the title, provides as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF EDMONDS, WASHINGTON, AMENDING PORTIONS OF THE EDMONDS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CODE TO MODIFY THE DEFINTION OF "LOT" (ECDC 21.55.010), DEFINING "LOT OF RECORD" (ECDC 21.55.015) AND ESTABLISHING A PROCESS FOR DETERMINING "INNOCENT PURCHASER" (ECDC 20.75.180 AND 20.01.003). The full text of this Ordinance will be mailed upon request. DATED this 19th day of November, 2014. .C1'1R1, S'TT PA...� M