PLN197800033-4109.pdf2
CITY OF EDMONDS
SUBDIVISION APPLICATION
X LOT -LINE ADJUSTMENT $10
SHORT SUBDIVISION - 4 lots or less;
$10 per lot.
To be filled in by Planning
DATE FILE
FEES 0.60 REC'T # I4%62
APO'S ,/TITLE REPORT`�
LEGALS : ✓
Existing ropose
MAP `,,z:�RAOING PLAN
SUBDIVISION - 5 lots or more; fee is $8 per lot, or ENV. ASSESS. v CK'LISI
0005 per square foot of lot area in
the Plat, whichever is greater. Minimum E/A FEE REC'T #
fee is $50. This fee is applicable to (DetermineU by �—
both preliminary and final plat submissions.
f HEARING DATE SET:,!' l a'"+c]r - - t — L6
APPLICANT: William N. Campbell ADDRESS: 20026 - 88th Ave. W- PHONE: 776-1035
Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: Owner
OWNER: ADDRESS: PHONE:
If other than applicant
1. REQUEST THAT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY BE DIVIDED INTO LOTS.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 18717 - Olympic View Drive
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF ENTIRE PROPERTY See attached
To be completed by the Planning Department:
Use Zone LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & APPROVED
Kroll Map No. BY: DATE:
2. MODIFICATION OR VARIANCE OF REQUIREMENTS
Applicant re ucLests that the Planning Commission consider the following modifications:
Applicant requests that the Board of Adjustment hear a variance for the following:
Driveway slopes to exceed 14%
CERTIFICATION: I do hereby certify that I own the above legally described property, and
further, that all contiguous property which I own, which has not received
a previous subdivision approval, is included herein.
I further certify that the attached list contains names, addresses and zip
codes of all property owners within 80 feet of the subdivision as recorded
with the County Assessor.
I understand that street dedications may be required in conformance with the
Official Street Plan of the City of Edmonds.
Froperty Owner
11/76
In order to meet the requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971*
the responsible official must make a declaration of environmental impact as early
as possible in the process of evaluating a project. .
not required, a btatement of Necati e --Iarati will be placed in the file.
If an impact statement is required, a draft statement must be filed with this
informationoffice, public notice given and a revie;,i period of 30 days allowed. The final
statement' and comments must be filed with tile Department of Ecology, office of
the Governor and tile Ecological Commission.
''- Staff will assist you in any way vie can in accumulating
sEdmonds
and
~'wewould, appreciate your cooperntlon^ ,
/
l` Land:
'
,
Area /n acres
Soils type
L/m/t^w".",
topography (� slope) -- . �
' .
`
roximate slope of +1101%
Grading: estimated,rubio yds.
Filling: estimated cubic yds.
` - ' ��.
'2, Water:
^
Stream - estimated flow ( ) per minute
Will stream be altered?-
To what degree?
Impact on storm drainage (increase in run-off)
hiah-
class storm sewer ayjiteT
Esz/wm^,u area to be '.,`. __F.�
_
Estimated area in open spaceN/A
Shorelines-: within 200 ft. of Mean Higher High WaterAdjacent to shorelines zone N/A.
|
minimum oiamoxer m u,tzu* ^" .=.="`
% to be removed 30
Ground cover Rrush
' Proposed landscaping, if any ^
. ^ . `
`
'
4proposed development*
'
�
`
`
'
^
^`
. �
^
,
5.
EstimatedEstimated increase in auto trips-dailY
None
~~...~ for ,--li- transportation_
Degree of change on adjacent streets
6.
neighborhood Only
city-wide
�
regional
Vacant
Family
ultl
F! a m i I Y
Comm.
Other
North
_X
East
X
7, Effect on air quality:
- None
8. thanges in noise generation: None
SUBMITTED By
�
�
ol
of
W�
W,
in
oa
-
H
87•
G48¢ •
i
N
c? ^► Ito ��
_�k°
206 776 W35
, 7
!.Milt
ti_City` of Edmonds
Depa-rtment'of Planning
orth
250,: Sth N
��-Edmonds,..*WA 98020
,
Re -.Variance Application No. V 2778
':
Gentlemen:
a, list of properties whose driveways'��;.
Enclosed for Your information is a par:.;
ti
are not in compliance with the Edmonds code.
zy
V !4.
eously".4,-
re under construction The following houses a or were built contemporaneously
with mine:
z,
STATUS
SLOPE
S1 Under construction
o In
_f 9R.—
``112 Hi-g-hj-g-�n--rprive :�;
180 Completed April 1 9 7 -J_
920 0lyH _PICMPAuP o Under construction
Y11'86 Olympia. %
venue 22Completed May'1978
20%
Forest Deil Drive
23%
"`9525 Completed Aprif.;19
8 179th Completed 1978'
3 Place S W
8936 179th S W 19%
Completed 1977
Place S W 20%
Completed' 1978'' 8930 179th
20%
B934 179th Place S W
Completed 1978
18%
Park Road** Completed 1978
j�32 Pion
eer )neev Way,**. 15% 8
1 Completed 197
16%
1 07. Pioneer:Way.
2 3
d
as not utilized-.,';,`
*Share 8' of paving with two other houses a maximum of three years ol
steeper if public right of way w
**D would be
**Driveways noted
Additional houses constructed in last several years
STATUS
SLOPE
ADDRESS Completed yrs.
.31
_0 Comp 4�f
550:12th N* d Approx-
yrs."�'
Complete
27%
7 N*
x 3'YTS'..
�560,12th Avenue 23% Completed ApprO '3.
"S j2th Avenue W yrso
40Completed Approx.
12th, AvenueN . .
Drive Completed Approx. 3 yrs
24%
Wood Lake Dr eted Approx 3 yrs
26903 Compl
'-L'20604 Wood Lake Drive .....
18%
Completed Approx. 3 yrs
8305 203rd Place S W* 25%
Completed Approx-
8 20%
307 203rd Place S W* Completed Approx.. 3 yrs
OF 8 20% 3.
03 203rd Place S W* Completed Approx.,L
8 3 25%
304 203rd Place S W
eper if grade started at property line as required.
ould be ste
C:jh
C1 F C
william n. campblle
20026 88th west edmonds, washington 9,802
May 15, 1978
LEROY F. MIUDLETON - -
C. WAYNr JONr.".
LLOYU 11. NI.LSON - -
;Zea, ft4ff & �dQl1ee4rw, 10C, ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS • PLANNERS
7:4 M—. St,,-t • LAnunnl•., wash,n,:ion eNU:D . �.Nlhl 77',!4,14
June 6, 1978
File No. 5481
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL
Lot i
That portion oi' Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as per plat thereof
recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County, Washington,
and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the whole being more
particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said
Tract 72; thence N89°15123"W along the southerly line of said Tract 72, a
distance of 253.51 feet; thence N32°57'12"W, 58.78 feet; thence N67°15'06"W,
11.44 feet to an intersection with the southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive
at a point on a curve from which the radial center bears S85°17'54"E, 586.20
feet; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive
on a curve to the right,an arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central angle
of 2°02'40" to.a point from which the radial center bears S83°15'14"E, 586.20
feet; thence S67°15'06"E, 23.74 feet; thence S32°57'12"E, 60.26 feet; thence
S89°15123"E 87.33 feet; thence N8°53'59"E, 62.87 feet; thence N69°18'25"W,
8.75 feet; thence N7°01142"E, 66.00 feet to the northeasterly line of said
Tract 72; thence S50°32'00"E along the northeasterly line of said Tract 72, a
distance of 203.74 feet to the southeasterly line of said Tract 72; thence
S39°28100"W along the southeasterly line of said Tract 72, a distance of 23.55
feet to the point of beginning;
SUBJECT TO an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under and across
72 the following described property: That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View
+; Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of
Snohomish County, Washington, and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said
plat, the whole being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at
the southeast corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15123"W along the southerly
line of said Tract 72 a distance of 198.16 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence continuing N89°1523"W along said southerly line 55.34 feet; thence K
N32057'12"W, 58.78 feet; thence N67°15'06"W, 11.44 feet to an intersection with
the southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which
the radial center bears S85017'54"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along
said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an
arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central angle of 2*02140" to a point from
which the radial center bears S83°15'14"E, 586.20 feet; thence S67°15'feet;
23.74 feet; thence S32°57'12"E, 60.26 feet; thence S89'15123"E, 41.31 feet;
thence SO°44'37"W, 15.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; and
TOGETHER WITH an easement for utilities over, under and across the following
gs:1 described property: The north 5.00 feet of the south 20.00 feet of that portion
of said Tract 72 lying east of Olympic View Drive and lying west of a line which
begins at a point on the south line of said Tract 72, distant 143.93 feet east
of the east margin of Olympic View Drive and extends N8°53'59"E, 20.20 feet to
the north line of said south 20.00 feet;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
Lot 2
That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded
in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County, Washington,
and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the
whole being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast
corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15123"W, along the south line of said
Tract 72, a distance of 154.29 feet; thence N8"53'59"E,15.15 feet to the True
Point of Beginning; thence N89°15123"W, 87.33 feet; thence N32°57'12'"W, 6o.26
feet; thence N67°15'06"W, 23.74 feet to an intersection with the southeasterly
margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which the radial center
bears S83°15'14"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly
margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an arc distance of 55.86
feet through a central angle of 5°27'34" to a point from which the radial center
bears S77°47140"E, 586.20 feet; thence S69°18'25"E, 152.35 feet; thence
S8°53'59"W 62.87 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
_1 Page. 1 of
June 6, 1978
File No. 5481
{
j
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR W111IAM N. CAHPBELL
(coat.) j
Lot 2 (cont.) ? j
TOGETHER WITH the following described portion of said Tract 72: Commencing
at the southeast corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15'23"W along the southerly
line of said Tract 72, a distance of 253.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence continuing N89 15 23 W along the south line of said Tract 72, a distance
of 44.71 feet to the easterly margin of Olympic View Drive; thence Ni°07'30"E
along the easterly margin of Olympic View Drive a distance of 16.63 feet to a
point of curvature; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly margin of
Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an arc distance of 36.59 feet through
a central angle of 3°34'36" to a point at which the radial center bears
S859i7'54"E, 586.20 feet; thence S67°15'06"E,11.44 feet; thence S32°57112"E,
.58.78 feet to the southerly line of said Tract 72 and the True Point of Beginning; and
TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under and across
.the following described property: That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View
Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records
of Snohomish County, Washington, and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said
Plat, the whole being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at
the southeast corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15123"W along the southerly
line of said Tract 72 a distance of 198.16 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence continuing N89°15'23"W along said southerly line 55.35 feet; thence
N32°57'12"W, 58.78 feet; thence N67°15'06"W, 11.44 feet to an intersection with
the southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which
the radial center bears S85°17154"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along
said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an
arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central angle of 2°02'40" to a point from
which the radial center bears S83'15114"E 586.20 feet; thence S67°15106"E,
23.74 feet; thence S32°57'12"E, 60.26 feet; thence S89'15'23"E, 41.31 feet;
thence SO°44'37"W, 15.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; and
SUBJECT TO an easement for utilities over, under and across the following
described property: The north 5.00 feet of the south 20.00 feet of that portion
of said Tract 72 lying east of Olympic View Drive and lying west of a line which
begins at a point on the south line of said Tract 72, distant 143.93 feet east
of the east margin of Olympic View Drive and extends N8°53'59"E, 20.20 feet to
the north line of said south 20.00 feet;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
Lot 3
!' That portion of Tract 72, and Tract i1, Block C, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as
A,; per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish
County, Washington and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the
y whole being more particulary described as follows: Beginning at a point on
the northeasterly line of said Tract 72, said point being N5032100"14, 203.74
feet distant from the northeast corner of said Tract 72• thence S7°0i'42"W
66.00 feet; thence N69°18125"W, 143.60 feet to an intersection with the
southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which the
radial center bears S77°47140"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along the
southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right an arc
distance of 110.00 feet through a central angle of 10'45'05" to an intersection
with the northwesterly extension of the northeasterly line of said Tract 72;
thence S50°32'00"E along said extension and along the northeasterly line of
said Tract 72 a distance of 141.50 feet to the point of beginning;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington
Page 2 of 3
June 6, 1978
File No. 5481
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL (cost.)
Total Legal Description
That portion of Tract 72 and Tract 11, Block C, p76 Sea View Tracts, as
per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Platsds , page age , records of Snohomish
County, Washington;
ed t, the
TOGETHER WITHat particulariyCdescrOibedpas follows: Beginning ic Avenue as shown on satdthe asoutheast
corner of said Tract 72; thence N89015'23"W along the south lineV f said
id Tract
72, a distance of 298.22 feet to the easterly margin of Olympic a
thence N1°07130"E, along said easterly
along tmargin
he outheasterly16.63 tmarginpofnOlympic View
curvature; thence northeasterly
Drive on a curve tothe
right
intersectiondwith the nce onorthwesterly extension off 223.37 feet through a the
angle of 21°49'55" toan
northeasterly line of said Tract 72; thence S50°32100"E along said extension
d Tract 72 a distncof
and along the norheastely line of northeasterlytcornerrof said Tract i72; thence S39°28a00"W, 23- 2eto
55feetto
the n�
the point of beginning;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
0�4Z 1 STEV,
o WAS"H'
y,"'
rss/01V LAho
The attachcd !'r:'I denrri^tion
has c
BY:
APPROVED: y Cr ;1neer
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF EDMONDS
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
TO:
MAIZ Y
0
Lu
SUSPENSE DATE:
MAYOR
As We Discussed
Investigate
and report
Take Appropriate
Action . ,
Prepare Letter/Memo for.
My Signature —
Mayor's Signature
Previously Ref'd
Status of Action?—__
For Your Information
Return
MAYOR'S ADMIN. ASS'T.
BUILDING OFFICIAL
CHIEF of POLICE
CITY CLERK
CITY ENGINEER
CITY PLANNER
FINANCE DIRECTOR
FIRE CHIEF
PARKS & REC. DIRECTOR
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORI
COMMENTS:
The Cit3Z shnul
th.qt- tbt3 dri-krp-wapq
rl have same way--guaranteelng—
wil e_4m1t-__1n_as__r_equ3_re.d..__
IL -:7 �v FROM: DATE:
- Z:
1.4
NAME CA M n SULL- 1:11.!. ?."o. 'S - 33- %S
HEARING DATE
• � 1'I;innlr' I':;1{x, ��1•�� 1`t)<•!1:!} f'n�[1'LI:i'I:i)
ITC0I2171':G R1.1+; 1'1
1. Right-of-way: 1
E1 ;'-r11 & SuFt=tct
2. Paving and Curbs: 2
C" is-r. 01.3 O4yHPtC- vW0 1)(2 .
IS svpFi o try'
3. Turn Arouid : 3
C1ttS'C' ttJ �?121JE�tq+� S I`� �VF�ICr�'v7
4. Sidewalks F, Planting Strip: 4
E1(tSi • SL) Fr,( C.I P*J-r O+J OLy"Pic-
Vjvw 'LIVE'
S. Access Easements: 5
rG(3?'"D -PER.. bQAW+�•1C., �4�t7
6. 1 ater Mains: 6
C1C t�.-r S- u Ft%i c t e'vi't'
7, Fire Hydrants: 7
C,X tS.T S,iFIC r ct t''* T
8. Sewers or Septic Tanks: F
S"t'C"j S c kit%t_ � S Px-Q u i R_e7>
g. Drainage: nstall all ncccsseiV 4torni sowers t
and drainage facilities per ordinance 1924 U
approved drni.tin�n ??1:ut. lChrre drainn.fjo j! across pri.,
property., all part.jcs hal-i.nsi Mw ownership interest
in the lands being platted Shrill providc, as a
restriction on the plat rinininc with the lalul,
that the City of Edmonds shall he held 11,111"IeSs
from any and all claims for damwcs, idvich inoy be
occasioned to adjacent land 1)), reason Or the
construction and operation of the drainage system,
m®
F,N'Gl%'C.RRIh(; RlsQUIhi7.-m.A,1:S FOR PLATS XND SI11OR"I ;ltt;•:S RP)III u}PItt
Page, Two (.°'1 },It'"� z2 rn m'T' }�} ' t't} PLETED
.— ' .__ }TtIr'lil},;r• Mpr-,, l.l.�,,,t.}. CIiP
unless, releases of dnmrigcs and/or droinai;e
easements are obtained from the other pr��pert}
owners affected by sale} drainas;c. :fin\• drihim'.c
prdblems created by channc of contour Burin}; plat
development must be corl-cctc(l, prior to plat
approval or release of plat Monet, Final. ;1pprova1
Of plat (release of plat bond) will be I,ithhcld
until actual drainripc ns installed Nis h(,cn in-
spected by the City Digineer. Frosion controls
shall be provided.
The following statement shall appear on all plat
sheets:
Commit: Olmcrs, and all persons hnv}nl! ally
present or subsequent o: m rship intcrest: iii
these lands, and the successors and assigns
of owners or other parties )laving; nily sn.id
interest, licrebv agree that the City of Ednrc»ds
shall be held hmnnless in ill respects from
any and ill claims for damngcs for iniunctitc
Tel ief which mar be occasioned no4•; or in the
future to acl j accnt land or iwprovc!i+cnts by
reason of the construction, operation :ind
maintenance or tte draina:gc system, aixl ]lord y
vmive and release tlic,City of Edi—nds from ;illy
and all claims for (birmpes, cxcbidins:,d;rmnc.c
caused solely by an act or omission of said
City and injunctive relief which the naauors,
or their successors or assigns,may themselvos
have now or in the future by renson'of the
construction, maintenance and operation of
said drainage system.
10. Utility Easements and Access there to:
W
11. undergrotind t",iring: 'ro he provide,} in nccorcl 11,
ance with Ordinance No. 1387. Street Lic,,liting
shall be also provided with the nccessary street
light standards and under -ground wiring connection.
Lt&t+-(s Not lrZ�'O•
12. Excavation and Grading: 1:xcnvation mid 12,
grading; shall conform to tlic I-equir0117cnts out-
lined in Chapter 70 of the iJnifoim 1io.ilcl.i.ryr; Code,
1967 Edition, 1101. 1. 1t1iero extensive };radin};
and drill are involved in the dcvelopment of a I)Iat,
a grading plan and specifications shall be prepared.
.E1'GINE P.TNG, RI:QU11Ut1;M'S t ItL 'Pw'1y r,aa SUBDIVl';1ONS
•Pa&e three
ENGINEERING All IINIS'f► ATIGii RliQ11II2li•1I:N'IS
In accordance i ith the platting rules nrd tet;ul.;l-
tions of the I;cilmonds Ci t-,• Cndc, the sponsor or
the application sil;lll advise the City I:nl;incer, ill.
waiting within 21 days of the ni}c)�c cl,ltc, the mctbr d
of assuring perfoivincc for the instillation of site
improvements. In:})ro\'ements: Imprc)vcrlerlts to he
provided by the developer shall conform to !"-ect.ion
12.08.350 of the .Edmonds City Code and to the fore-
going list of engineering requirements.
Subdivision ordinance \n. 17n3, Section 6. rc`ct}en
12.10.060 Apl).l).cation ;ind 1-ccs: (d) I'ilhl is '!rl}}}recc-
ment Inspection Fee - -An i'lspecti.on }cc i.n t lid amount
flZ L. Z percent of tile estimated :Collstructioil cost
for the public irgirovenlerits shall be proi•idcd sub-
sequent to the approval of the dc�-el.opmcnt and
engineering plans.by the Engineering Department.
Alternate method of providing site irlprovcments
are as 'follows
1. By furnishing, the City- of I:dh:t<)nds t•: i til n p-r-
fornlance bond'satisfactory to the Cit}• lautiineer,
in ttihich assurance is given t,te City t1l,:lt the
installation of the minimum hilprovcnients I%J l i l'*c
carried out as provided in Section 12.08.350 of the
Edmonds City Code. Tllel ie ount of -bond shnl l cox -or
110 percent of the Fligineers' estimate of Iaublic
works and utilityimprovements.
2. By actual installation of .jhj)rorcrncnts i.n
accordance with the provisions of section
12.08.350 and in accordance with the illstallnti.on
requirements and Linder the su}7ervisi.ola of the City
Engineer.
Regardless of the irtctlnd er-plo;;ed bx• the c}cvclopcl
for the installation of improvements. "0 improve-
nents shall be finally acccptcd I.)), the City of
Edmonds until the developer fln•r)islles the
Ath a bond in the ;lmount of l , percent of the.
-ost of said improvcm:'lits to gu;lrnilte(, s;iid iiil..
urovemcnts ngai.nst defects in i;«rl<m; nship ;lad/or
haterial.s for a period of two (2) years. from the
late of such final acceptance."
Uso, before final acceptance, till ns-hllil.t c}r;ll�ing
)f site improvements sb;ill be submitted by the
leveloper's engineer and approved by the City
F.noineer.
10
011)
IT 1:1:t'n!' ir.r 'n (T.).' f'LTTI:[)'
ENGINEERING P.EtiIII�mm-3irs miz Pj.j1is tu) SImmv, !(: s
Paga Four
The City Digincer will. mvie I) l ans for i ngiroi•c-
ments, prior to the start of constr>>cticn. ':ntif}•
the Cite Enginccr of the sclic(!i,lc of const»u.tion
prior to commencing Mork (NO h;t I(,k 1'; i l.L rr i (NPEP i'.-1fJ
IN THE PUBLIC I?t{r1T1'-(?I-t'.i\1' W,'I'II, tiltll" PIZED I',l'
ENGINEERING DEPNt11'd TQ ,
If you hati�e any'tl�iesti:bn5 coriccii�inc*, the above,
please contact the City Enginecr's office.
CaNIME rs
a.
b. I
c: c
Ca t�
\) g,Main Street . Edmonds, Washington 980200 G#,Rsaa
ƒ . .
-)
< * Jun 12, Ig7 .,(fanS a� 311 d
} File , aka! .
§L6 |2 1 NAP \
/ . PRELIMINARY cod ESTIMATE Q��u
R .
* .
WILLIA N. CAMPBELL .
+ : The following figures are strictly conceptual and are based on reason-
able assumptions of estimated footages and quantities. Actual costs will be
,determined aft r completion and approval . of all Plans an specifications. . .
:
2^$ D iveway .
\\)
Assume !a' width for 90 l.f, - 180 s. . IF $5.25/ s. . $ 5.0 \
Total b bond figure to 11� cost 2 . ..9 � . � ! 1,0 aR:s0 . .
} NIuN 2 e AE ENGINEERING . WATER SUPPLY , WASTE I;E!lIVIENT , ;ukvFY; A CA)A.T\A. rNGINEEINC,
%\ AIRPORT PLANNING a DESIGN , mA 6 NAS , PORT a INDUSTRIAL DEVEEonuE,I , 1E4 e e u!Y STUDIES
I
► �-.
CITY OF ED`intlDS REC£i',r
RECORD OF SHORT SUBDIVISION AN 2 9 i978
Public Works oc,
This is to certify that the properties as shown on the attached map (Exhibit "A") and
described as follows:
See Exhibit "B"
i
Have been divided -.under the provisions of the Edmonds Subdivision Ordinance (Sec.12.10)
File No.b S 33..7.i3r subject to the following conditions and requirements:
1.- Exhibit "C": Hold Harmless Agreement
2. Variance requir`dd to exceed maximum driveway slope to serve 3 single family homes
approved May 17, 1978. File V-27-78. Covenant required; recorded A #
3. Connection of all lots to sanitary sewers. t �-0 6 43037
4. Approved drainage plan per ordinance 1924.
5. Utility easements and access there to as required for utility service.
6. All wiring to be underground. {
7. Excavation and grading in conformance to the Uniform Building Code.
8. Access easement to be Installed In conformance with approved draw W0j-PMRtWr `
FOR
RI CORDING
CITY OF EDMONDS
By 1i1I.X� -f_
Page _._ Of W
I/we hereby certify that I/we are the legal owner(s) of the property described above.
I/we warrant that all representations are true and correct and understand that in the
event of any misrepresentation or failure to comply with the conditions and regulations
set forth herein, the City of Edmonds shall have the right to declare the subdivision
void and record a statement to that effect in the grantor -Grantee's Index in the office
of the Snohomish County Auditor.
Signed: �j P r �.3 ' " 1
Wi111am�, Camp
be
Emily L ampbeli���_7�
OLYMPIC BUILDERS
Dated this 19th day of June 19 78 By�William N.�C,ampbe , Partner
STATE OF WASHINGTON)
COUNTY OF SNOHOMISH) ss:
On this day personally appeared before me WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL and
E MILY L. CA M PBELL , to me known to be the individuals described in
and who executed the within and foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that the,__
signed the same as their free and voluntary act and deed, for the usd�>7 r-
Roses therein mentioned.
•,,Gtr �5r �
Given under my hand and official seal this 19th day of June
�,� /' � � 'yam �/ •-�i.
'hrr Jr. 1 C� .
,7606Z303 7 P4Cr �� Notary u51 i c in and or the Sty �lJ,f� I asM* ,g*ai
r e s i di g at.�p_c_.. ... .
{u
FILE N0.-33-78' ..•,.{ ,_... .
r�f
EXHIBIT "V
Owners, and all persons having g any present or subsequent
ownership
interest in these lands, and the successors and assigns of owners or
�..
other parties having any,said•interest,•hereby agree that the City)
of Edmonds shall be held harmless in all respects from any and all
�k
claims for damages for injunctive relief which may be
Y occasioned
oned
now or in the future to adjacent land or improvements by reason•,T, 11,+
of the construction, operation and maintenance of the drainage system
and hereby waive and release the City of Edmonds from any and all
claims for damages, excluding damage caused coley by an act or
omission of said City and injunctive relief which the owners, or
their successors or assigns, may themselves have now or in the
future by reason of the construction, maintenance and operation of
said drainage system.
AN
06230375
i 8yrn
AUTI-IORIZED `
FOR '
RECORDING
CITY OF E.DMONDS )
1
By --1-niL&.__.._._
Page —2— Of _io
V nnr
� I t�Ct4K & 4d lodes eed, 14C. ENGINEERS SURVEYORS + PLANNERS
J:A kia u, ..U,.•1 IAnt ud ., Wahh,ngiun `slits, ft"• ,jtlb, 7P, 'I i.I i
• `,UTHORiZED
June 6, 1978 FOR
File No. 5481" RECORDING
ca'lY OF EDMONDS
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR WiLLIAM N. CAMPBELt.
Ily
':. L.o k l Page
-_ Of _�--
That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as per plat theeof
r
y recorded in Volume 3.of Plats, page.76, records of Snohomish County, Washington,
and of vacated Olympic Avenue as, shown on said plat, the whole being more
particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast corner of said
Tract 72; thence N89°15'23"W along the Southerly line of said Tract 72, a
i distance of 253.51 feet; thence N32°57'12"W,..58.78 feet; thence N67°15'06"W,
t4
11.,44 feet to an intersection with the southeasterly margin of.Olympic View Drive
at "a point on a curve from which the ,radial center bears S85°17'54"E; 586.20
r5 foci.; thence not' theasterly,along said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive
fi on a curve to the right,an arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central angle
of'2°02'40" to a point from which the radial center bears •S83°15'14"E,.586.20
feet; thence S67°15106"E, 23.74 feet; thence S32°57'12"E, 6o.26 feet; thence
3� S89°15123"E 87.33 feet; thence N8°53'59"E, 62.87 feet; thence N69°18'25"W, ;!
13.75 feet; thence N7°01142"!:, 66.00 feet to the northeasterly line of said
W Tract 72; thence 'S50°32'00"E along the northeasterly line of said Tract 72, a '
distance of 203.74 feet to the southeasterly line of said Tract 72; thence t'
S39°28100"W along the southeasterly line of said Tract 72, a distance of"23.55
feet to the point of beginning;
SUBJECT TO an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under and across �
;b the following described property: That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View
in Volume of Plats age 76, records of
w° Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded3 P
Snohomish County,, Washington,. and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said
9 plat, the whole being more particularly described as foiIows: Commencing at
the southeast corner of said Tract 72;'Chence N89°15123"W along the southerly
t line of said Tract 72 a distance of 198.16 feet to th�TrueYPoint of Beginning;
thence continuing N89,,°15123"W along said southerly line 55.313 feet; thence Y ' 1
N32°57'12"W, r' " 11.44 feet to an intersection with
! 58.78 feet; thence Nb7 i� 06 W,
the southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which
4 the radial center bears S85°17'54''E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along f
v said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an
arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central angle of 2°02'-40" to a point from
x which the radial center bears S83°i5'l4"E, 586,20 feet; thence S67°15'06"E,,
23.74 feet; thence S32°57'12"E, 60.26 feet; thence 'S89°15123"E, 41:31 feet; t
thence SO°44'37"W, 15.00'fee t to the True Point of Beginning; and s
TOGETHER WITH an easement for utilities over, under and across the following' r y ty
l described property:. The north 5.00 feet of the south 20.00 feet of that portion
of said Tract 72 tying east of Olympic View Drive and lying west of a line which s
begins at a point on the south tine of said Tract 72, distant 143.93 feet east
of the east margin of Olympic View Drive and extends N8°53'59"E, 20.20 feet to
the north Line of, said south 20.00 feet;
Situate inSnohomish County, Washington.
Zli
Lot 2 {
That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea-Viety Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded
IN
in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish County,''Washington,
and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the
whole being, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast
zi corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15'23"W,'along the south line of said
} Tract 72, a distance ni' 154.29 feet thence N8°53'59"Ey15.15 feet to the True
Point of Beginning; thence N89°15'23"W, 87.33 feet; thence N32°57'12"W, 60.26
fret; thence N67°15'o6"W, 23.74 feet to an intersection with the southeasterly
margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a curve from which the radial center
bears S83°15114"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along said southeasterly
margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an arc distance of 55.86
Y feet through a central angle of 5°27'34" to a point from which the radial center
.'s bears S77°47'40"E, 586.20 feet; thence S69°18'25"E, 152.35 feet; thence
S8°5315911W 62.87 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
.:.i
p f Page 1 of
MO b3031� va�332 rA564
June 6, 1978 ;
Fite No. 5481
LEGAL UESCRiPTION FOR WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL (cont.)
Lot 2 (cont.)
i
TOGETHER WITH the following described portion of said Tract 72: Commencing
at the southeast corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15'23"W along the southerly
r line of said Tract 72, a distance of 253.51 feet to the True Point of Beginning; t
thence continuing N89'15'23"W along the south line of said Tract 72, a distance
of 44.71 feet to the easterly margin of Olympic View Drive; thence NI°07'30"E I
along the easterly margin of Olympic View Drive a distance of 16.63 feet to a
point of curvature; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly.margin of I
r Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right an arc distance of 36.59 feet through
a central angle -of 3°34'36" to a point at which the radial center bears
S85°17154"E, 586.20 feet; thence S67°15'06"E,11.44 feet; thence S32'57'12"E,
58.78 Feet to the southerly line of said Tract 72 and the True Point of Beginning; an '
�t TOGETHER WITH an easement for ingress, egress and utilities over, under and across
-the following described property: That portion of Tract 72, Edmonds Sea View i
4 Tracts, as per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records
"fin of Snohomish County, Washington, and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said }
plat, the whole being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at
fa the southeast corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15123"W along the southerly e
line of said Tract 72 a distance of 198.16 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
thence continuing N89°15123"W along said southerly line 55.35 feet; thence
fi N32°57112"W, 58.78 feet; thence N67015'06"W 11.44 feet to an intersection with !
the southeasteri margin of Olympic View Drive at
Y 9point on a curve from which �
the radial center bears S85°17'54"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along
said southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right, an
3 arc distance of 20.92 feet through a central 'angle..of'2*02'40" to -a point from }
which the radial center bears S83'15'14"E, 586.20 feet; thence S67°15'06"E
,. 23.74 feet; thence 532*57'12"E, 60.26,feet; thence S89°15'23"E, 41.31 feet;
thence SO°44137"W, 15.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; and '
SUBJECT TO an easement for utilities over, under and across the following f
described property: The north 5.00 feet of the south 20.00 feet of that portion
d of said Tract 72 lying east of Olympic View Drive and lying west of a line which
begins at a point on the south line of said Tract 72, distant 143.93 feet east i
of the east margin of Olympic View Drive and extends NV 53'S9"E, 20.20 feet to
R the north line of said south 20.00.feet;
' Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
1
Lot 3
',
x3 That portion of Tract 72, and Tract 11, Block C, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as
- per plat thereof recorded in ;Volume'3.of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish i
County, Washington and of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the
whole being more particulary described as follows: Beginning at "a point on
l the northeasterly line of said Tract 72, said point being N50°32100"W; 203.74 !'
feet distant from the northeast corner of said Tract 72; thence 57'01'42"W,
66.00 feet; thence N69°18'25"W, 143.60 feet to an intersection with, the
M� southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive at a point on a, curve from which the i
radial center bears S77°47'40"E, 586.20 feet; thence northeasterly along the
southeasterly margin of Olympic View Drive on a curve to the right an arc
g distance of 110.00 feet through a central angle of 10°45'05" to,an.intersection
:4
+3 with the northwesterly extension of the northeasterly line of, said Tract 72;
1 thence S50°32'00"E along said extension and along the northeasterly line of
x� said Tract 72 a distance of 141.50 feet to the point of beginning;
Situate -in .Snohomish County, Washington
5 AUTHORIZED
FOR
RECORDING
u1, CITY OF EDMONDS
I By —�
i' Page Of t_
�i
.,
Page 2 of 3
.180 623O3 7 5 3 3`? P's;5, 85
i
r�
Ld
June 6, 1978
File No. 5481
fi
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL (cont.)
Total legal Description y
That portion of Tract 72 and Tract 11, Block C, Edmonds Sea View Tracts, as 1
per plat thereof recorded in Volume 3 of Plats, page 76, records of Snohomish
County, Washington;
'? TOGETHER WITH a portion of vacated Olympic Avenue as shown on said plat, the
_ whole begin more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the southeast `
corner of said Tract 72; thence N89°15'23"W along the south line of said Tract
72, a distance of 298.22 feet to the easterly margin of Olympic View Drive;
thence N1°07'30"E, along said easterly margin 16.63 feet to a point of
curvature; thence northeasterly along the southeasterly margin of Olympic View
Drive on a curve to the right an arc distance of 223.37 feet through a central
angle of 21°49'55" to an intersection with the northwesterly extension of the
northeasterly line of said Tract 72; thence S50°32'00"E along said extension
and along the northeasterly ,line of said Tract 72 a distance of 345.24 feet to;".
,x= the northeasterly corner of said Tract 72; thence S39°28'00"W, 23.55 feet to i .?
the point of beginning;
Situate in Snohomish County, Washington.
STE
WASy .y
d
z
! A'
°F _ w•r rr N� . . � f
f IOHAL 00
All
ff+
t i
�•i3 `
`M a Cry q i f
— r )
—.1 of '
P i
A T
Fly.
r AUTHORIZED
FOR
RECORDING
Page 3 of 3 !
CITY LOF EDMONDS
By
80 62303 7 5 ,col 332 fliGi 5b6 Page -IA- Of_
J'.
c
SEP 25 i978
z
C0141UNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Puuuc , 0i� W'1
Building, Division
DATE: September 22, 1978
s
T0: FIRE DEPARTMENT
PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.�'
PLANNING DIVISION
SUBJECT: Drainage ,at Che address of 18719.01ympic View Drive
{y�s
r4:
..
William Campbell -Permit ;�770551
Z
requirements on
Please review and advise any outstanding
above, in order that they maybe given final approval and
a Certificate of Occupancy issued.
r
J
1( t
i
}µ
'.r
t`f
Harry M. Whitcutt
Building Official
HMW/ae
.. A.
4j t
FIE
113rios HARVE W. HARRISON
CITY OF EDIV MAYOR
• EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 96C2, - (2061775.2525
CIVIC CENTER
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
September 25, 1978
'Mr. and Mrs. William Campbell
8125 Frederick Place
Edmonds, Washington 98020
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Campbell:
Subject:
-
In response to your letter dated September 13, 1978, the
following items need your attention'prior to releasing the
funds:
1. Remove the existing pavement (marked in red on the
attached sheet).
2. Access easements for ingress/egress must be
recorded.
3. File and record the covenant required by the Board,
of Adjustment Hearing of May 17, 1978,(Minutes attached).
If you have any further questions regal. -ding this matter,
please feel free to contact Jerry Saterl'ie of the Engineering
Division, 775-2525, extension 220.
Yours very truly,
Ufa
D F. HERZBERG, P.E.
0
ty Engineer
JES:jak
Attachments
$1
�erie�t. in �ec.t.
f�
,
1N
:.
s� t. is
)fir
public portion of tine hearing was opened. Vern Dauer of 19707 44th Ave. W.
i
said the office portion' of the proposal would be for the Gwinn Construction
office. lie noted that at the City Council meeting the previous evening
when the right-of-way reduction was approved there had been traffic
problems discussed. He felt that to have parking at the front of this
I
-site would compound the traffic problems. Elizabeth Mathey of 8006
!
.240th St. S.W. said she was in favor of granting the variance. She
said the property had been an eyesore for- years because of neglect and
she felt the proposed use of the land was extremely compatible with the
area because of the small amount of traffic which would be generated.
She also felt the landscaping at the front of the site would be benefi-
cial to the neighborhood. She said she thought she spoke for other
+
people in the community. The public portion of the hearing was then
closed.
z.
Mr.Hovde felt there would be more and more of this type of planning,
with parking at the rear. He felt landscaping looks much better than
p
�
a parking lot and he noted that the City had reviewed ,the landscape
requirements: He did not feel the granting of this variance would
decrease the neighborhood's valuation or cause any problems whatsoever.
Mr. Hatzenbuhier agreed, and felt the proposed development would greatly
,
improve the area. Mr. Leraas noted that the Council's action in reducing
the right -of -gray had made this a minimum variance. MR. HATZENBUHLER`THEN
MOVED, SECONDED BY MR. HOVOE, TO APPROVE V-24-78 BECAUSE IT MET THE CRITERIA
FOR A VARIANCE, IT WOULD ENHANCE THE iIEIGHBORHOOD, AND IT MOULD NOT BE
DETRIMENTAL TO THE SAFETY AND WELFARE OF THE AREA. MOTION CARRIED.
AGENDA
V-27-78 WILLIAM N. CAMPBELL - Variance to exceed the maximum i4`, driveway slope
to serve three single-family homes at 18715, and 18719 Olympic
vi
.18717,
View Dr. (115-12)
Mrs, Luster said the Planning Department was recommending denial of
the variance, as requested, but an alternative proposal was submitted:
which she mould review. The first variance requested was not recommended
for approval because it was.not a minimum variance in that it was possible
to reduce the safety hazards created by the 22".� slope by redesign of the
2
driveway, and because the driveway slope situation was created by the
applicant and was not a result of outside action. .Mrs. Luster showed-.
location the the She this
3r
the of proposal and a slide of, site. said
would not amount to a rezone and the use would be compatible with zoning
° s,
}
in:the area. The; alternate proposal would have driveway slopes not to
•
exceed 18.4a, whereas the original proposal had some as great as 22".
Strict enforcement of the Code would deprive the applicant of reasonable
r?
access .tohis property.... Topography of the areacreatedtheprohlem ands-�
7
the alternative. proposal appeared to be a feasible solution. Granting
of the variance would not be detrimental to others in the vicinity as it
would improve the site problems, would create fewer steep climbs. amt_
u
�£
would move.._the.dr_i.vcoray. aetay__frgLiTthe curve on Ol,rnpic Vregr Dr. A lot
ine.adjustment would be required, and an a'pplrcatron"tiad Been made for
that. :'firs. _Luster felt that granting of the variance would be compatible
with the Zoning Code as it, would provide safer access to the lots and
w._
'"Stfe'"r'econmended
cni
nave the. access away from „the , curve in Ol'y`mpi"c Vretir Di
3R.
"approval"'of'ttie ai ternative plan. She added that a'"covenant should be
t
filed to indicate that the owner assumes responsibility to reconstruct
xr
the driveway to City standards if the City should widen the roadway of
Olympic View Dr. Mrs. Derleth asked what had been the requirements of
$xt
the subdivision when this property was subdivided. ' Assistant City
,,.
Engineer Dick Allen explained that at the preliminary design stage
9� P P Y g 9
BOARD OF ADJUS11)[11T
Page 4 - May 17, 1978
there is certain topography required but the house plan is not with the
layout. The election of the developer of the property under single
building permits was such that there were certain trees and topography
changes not desirable on the part of the applicant, and when inspections
were made of the driveways after they were installed they were not in
accordance with the code standards. Mr. Ailen said subdivisions are
only approved on conditions that they are meeting the City code, but
j
in this case the code standards were not meta lie said that at the
subdivision hearing there was a knowledge of steep topography, but there
1
were various options for placing the houses. The public portion of the
hearing was opened;
John Anderson of Reid, Hiddleton & Associates said their new plan was
given a favorable reconunendation by the City Engineer. Mr. Anderson
felt the driveways, indicated would not be detrimental to the 'safety of
the area or to the future owners of the domes. He explained the
various grades at the different locations on the property. lie said
the applicant would be willing to reduce that percent of slope to no
v
more than a maximum of 20'., but the applicant felt it would be an
additional hardship on him and detrimental to the property if the
alternative access as proposed would be implerented. He said that of
the a1ternatiyeJ s_.approved the existing; paving will have to ke—torn`out
and an 18" maple tree which is a;'pe`rt"af"'tfie ae`stfiefics"'of tfie pt`ope`rty '"
will have to be removed. tie displayed a, drawing illustrating driveways
in the vicinity which have greater:' grades, and lie said they were not
asking for anything the neighbors haven't had. He also displayed a' }
photograph of neighboring driveways. lie said they are not going right II
doom to the right -of -Tray with the steep slope and there is room to.
back two cars to get onto the right-of-way without any safety problem.
He felt it would be extreme hardship if the applicant were not adored
to utilize his existing paving, and he said the applicant was willing to
bring.that up to City standards. sir. Allen was asked why_ the alternative
-access was:;. considered safer than that proposed by the applicant. fie said
i
.
• ' "'I
that by _changing tie,slope.you.are also reducing the run -out area`and -
he o-7a"s concerned about the,,approach angle to the street He expanded
`Z
on that and 'said he`was also concerned with the sight"distances as they ;
approach there He_ noted that the road has 3 general curve to the Join-
ward and—t_ the_rnght as .orie_ approaches south to north tir-ttovde com=:
z
merited that 0tympic„V�ew Dt is a nightmare of An
— _...
responc that travei�nq north on Olymptic you would take two right turns.
and with the proposal you make a gradual curve lie thought the existing
paving and widening of it was the best choice 6i11 Campbell. architect
for the project, said that when the plat was conceived he felt it desirable
to locate the driveways adjacent to the other access points on Olympic.
He said he'had considered it since this problem had arisen, and he urns
xj
really trying to save the trees and the env ironumnt; He thought the
excesses in slope were fairly modest in.comparison to other examples in
the City. ;'lie said he would do what the Board wanted, but he would prefer !
to leave the driveways, as they are. lie thought that with a widened
driveway the siring would be better off the street and they would just be
ham,
improving what they already had. The public portion of the hearing was `
ri
then closed.
Hovde asked how the existing driveways wee constructed, that there
r
,,44r.
must have been permits. 'Mr. Campbell responded that he had building'
f
permits on all of the houses with driveways shown essentially as they
�±
are. Mr. Allen said that in their review of building permits they
reviewed the driveways. iir, said they issue a n:ereo on the face of each j
nn
permit given to the applicant saying that driveways must conform to -
slope standards. -From that there is no point at which the builder calls
and says he is ready for inspection of the driveway prior to paving
and other construction. He said the driveways were in when they -made j
1
BOARD OF ADJUSi'MEHT
Page 5 - May 17, 1978
y }
1
i
an inspection of the site and it v.as discovered at that time that
they were not in conformance with the slope standards. Mr. Hovde
thought it looker: impossible to meet the standards. iir. Allen said
it is not usual that a topographic plan goes in with a single family
!
building permit application. He said it is assumed that grading will
be done to conform to steep slopes. City Attorney Wayne Tanaka noted
that the fact that a permit is issued does not mean a person does not
}i
need a variance, and the fact that a building permit was issued does
X
not excuse the necessity for a variance in this case. Mr. Roy.said
he found the tr..ucti_ve._.._He.
..the.alternativefrom. .S.taff_to.be_coils felt
there wouid:,be, more -room to stop with ,that,aitern3tive. He didn't
fee tithe whole thing should be torn out but he thought somebody should
have; looked at the grade lines fir..Visser. agreed that the alternative
solution was the better. Mr. Leraas said he had gone up and dorm the
driveway and. felt there was'a'si9 t impairment to the south. lie favored
the second alternative did
as firs. Sfote i4r. Canpbell said he would
accept the'atterRa0 vg tie said he thought -these are subtl finds of
"tliin9s £hey are dealing with. Mrs. Derleth was concerned that develop-
ments get to this stage before such questions are resolved. Given the
*if;
alternatives", she felt the last one was the best solution. MRS. STOLE
MOVED TO. ACCEPT THE ALTERNATIVE RECOMI.IENDATION FOR V 27-78 BECAUSE IT
IS"A-REASONABLE VARIANCE AND:APPEARS TO BE A MINIMUM VARIANCE THAT
CAN BE'ALLOWED UNDER T14E CIRCUMSTANCES; BECAUSE IT WILL BE "A SAFETY
e
i sir
FACTOR AND NOT DETRIMENTAL; AND THAT THE OWNER WILL ASSUME RESPONSIBILIT'(
FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF T14E DRIVEWAY TO CITY STANDARDS IF THE CITY WIDENS
{ ,
THE ROADWAY OF OLYt1PIC VIEkI DR. Gene Greenway, one of the partners in
Olympic Builders,
said the covenant was not a reasonable requirement.
He said the City was trying to make them assume costs that other tax-" '
payers do not have to assume. He said it was an unreasonable restraint
the
on sale of the property. fie said he had been told: this had been
implemented.in the last two months, and they were the only builders
being given,this burden. fir. Roy responded that Olympic View Dr. is
unique and probably never will He said
change. the City probably should
have prevented them from building the driveway, then tney could have
excavated the'hillside--at a.larger cost to them MRS STOLE THPI
REPHRASED HER MOTION, -THAT fIE: ALTERNATIVE RECO I,IEilDATIOr1 FOR,'(r27 7.II..8E
ad
APPROVED BECAUSE TO STRICTLI;,EttFORCE 7..HE Z01i;lG CODE WOULD BE DEPRIVING .
...._
x.
THE'APPLICANT OF RIGHTS ENl YE0 BY_O.THERS AND..GRAtTI1lG �F THE VARin'!CE
WOULD NOT DE,_DET2Ir1EliTAL TO,SAFETY; BECAUSE THE ALTERNATIVE
i
, IS A SAFETY
FACTOR Fl !D SIZE FELT •IT. TO BE:.RLASOt7ABLE FURTHER THAT l COVENA 1T -,BE--
FILED REQUIRING THE 0!LIERS TQ:RECONiSTRUCTSO�CiZT-Y_3TAil
<%
10
.�PDSiTjLE DRI"E:b1YS
ON 80711 PROPCRTIES_ AFFECTED BY THE ACCESS IF 1PICVIc"
r
OLY DR, i$ EVER
1JhDEt[ED. -John Anderson objected to the requirement ofconstruction to
"Ci because
�"`' x f;�
yEy—sstandards" the City standards are not now met and any
F
reconstruction would not meet .City .-standards. MRS. STOLE STRUCK FROM
HER t10TION THE WORDS —TO CITY STANDARDS `IN THE REQUIREMENT FOR RECONSTRUC-
i
DZZ
`%CNDEd THE MOTION. OF T1EDRIVEIAYSiR. POFir. Hovde'obJected
to the covenant, saying if the City should widen the street
I
y,
they could
cut back the driveways and change the grade. lie said they will have to
resiope an area for a short distance to make it to back
i
{
passable get
up there again. Ile felt the
i
covenant should be emitted. A ROLL CALL
VOTE WAS TAKEN,
s
WITH MRS. STOLE, MR: ROY, MR. HATZENGUHLER, MR.;VISSER,
AND MR. LERAAS VOTING YE ND MR. IIOVDE, MR. BAILEY, AND MRS. DERLETH
VOTING NO.QlOTION CARRIED. A, recess
#
V-30-78
short was announced.
R. E. DUROCHER - Variance requesting"1,000 sq. ft. reduction onlot7 size and 1' from required rear yard setback at 9528 220th St. S.W. (RS-8)
i
rz
..i
Mr. Leraas advised that he has worked with Mr. Durocher and he asked to
be
r
W.h
e excused from this hearing. tie left t rostrum. - Mrs. Luster said
the variance was in conjunction with a recent subdivision. She said it
would not amount to a rezone. Because of the location of an existing
b
09,
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
�b
, Page 6 - May 17, 1978
t6.
i
{
i
A
City of Edmonds
Edmonds, Washington
F*Mry 9 79
Washington
)AY —00u* S $ 0-
PIP
0 THE cupmll ems
TOUR
2=6 SM A". V-
City of.tovw"*
EdMU6. Wfflhi*gtM MM
EDMONDS BRANCH
OPLES NATIONAL BANK OF WASHINGTON
EDMONDS. WASHINGTON
�RIPTION Cost m Dapesit re
4 14 of IS
r4ij,vew " BRv
WARRANTS REDEEMED
BONDS a COUPON$ RED11:114go,
PRINCIPAL
INTEREST
SN
109hy.
00
Cou""a
Ms
,RY
Y
NO.
r�--- ' -- '-'-
!
! `
! .
DATE: /g
MEMO TO: Building Division
Community Development Department
FROM: Engineering Division'
f .I
Public Works Department
SUBJECT': FINAL INSPECTION
^.�
PROJECT: mil ,��t 1C1 C�(��,�c ���.ti 1 ki Ijr--
APPROVED NOT APPROVED
Q Engineering Division'
BY:
(� Water Division
BY:
Sewer Division
3E
BY:
#�
r.
!'
"I
f
L
Y,
y
i
,
SUBDIVISION STS US
SHEET ~
DATE
COMMEN PS
COCi ILETE;D
i
i
- 11-
� t