PLN197900026-8270.pdf.. � �'dwr� ®�� COI ��
o a
.,
�...�
,,�
^'
F'Y �.L
iF® ��,
.,�
.. ,. ;..
��
ItJ•f• - 1
..,;.
i
. �. �.
}:
i
..
� .
> i
1�K
!
°��+
1
�
�
�
� McaW)
i
1
1 �C4=:
�..�
'
R�.<�
�+.
�.
iM
dI,M
- �'
'
V i
!)
i
i'
Ykn;
�'`-'
�j
�t
�
t
r
arsw
CITY OF EDMONDS FILE #
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT DATEs�
APPLICATION FOR VARIANCE FEE
REC'T #0 3 /
HEARING DATE:
APPLICANT I.UP GT10� ADDRESS °�la SKYUW 84V* CITY & ZIP 0*0Abe '79020
PHONE 774- - 46 5 Indicate type or degree of interest in the property: QW
OWNER: ADDRESS,CITY & ZIP PHONE
LOCATION OF PROPERTY(ADDRESS) g�l £� (NM ((j V Its
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERY: S(F(E '
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED & P R E
USE ZONE BY PLANNING DIVISION
ZONING ORDINANCE REQUIREMENT:
VARIANCE REQUESTED: A�-� gLgll-��Nc� 't° -ACT" �� �`(� M�`I �-� : -
(fjfTc� O-1 T 00W6,c, ZS St `c�F�e
:
F-
STATEMENT OF CONDITIONS AND REASONS FOR REQUEST, IN ACCORDANCE WITH STANDARDS AND CRITERIA
ATTACHED:k"c�IWtfJ(o 7`0tI` o�ILOP C,l AAr�7"-4'bZ�
I�.fl Cam' w MP O CaJ! iTWMa) SIUM M .A ra ass to Mul
_T M b (.I�Stt-'(. {'�e �r'1 vevo vN TO ice" '6i*i� i71�
LtN AN
STATE OF WASHINGTON)ssoLnk ft 6016) % 00 r"f gi, p is (1.oAflCOUNTY OF SNOHOMISH'
Signatur of Applicant, Own& or Representative
On this date, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and r t e State of
Washington, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared _ ,who, being
duly sworn, on /her oath deposes and says that (s)he has prepared a read the foregoing
statements and has acknowledged to me that the recitations contained therein are true, and has
signed this instrument as44e/her free and voluntary act and deed for the purposes ''therein
mentioned..
Subscribed and sworn to before me thi sq:P da of
..� residing aty—
_ ttitaec_'
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington.
x
`-1 ALLEGATIONS OF APPLICANT
POINT 1. The following are the special circumstances which apply to my property
which deprive me of rights and privileges which are enjoyed by other properties in
the vicinity under the identical zone classification.
U
POINT 2. The variance I am requesting will not be detrimental to the public wel
fare or injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of a zone in
which my -property is located because,
POINT 3. If this variance is not granted, an unnecessary hardship will continue
to the owner of this property, the cause of which is beyond his control because:
05 LL)ILL, 4we 70 l L;D . Pip hit AjUWfr ,ag � 7b
I
POINT 4. So as not to grant a special privilege to me by the granting of this
variance I submit the following conditions to be imposed so as not to cause.in-
consistencies with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity and zone
in which I am located.
S�=1bkCKS 10 90 g t CcDC=
c.0beDF �Dh�toaf� t'• £.
DFA
I ti
Recce r i nd i ngs of Fact by Board of Adj u6- tmen t- ��--
e Board of Adjustment for the City of Edrnonds finds in th
e case of �7viAruG►�ov1
File No. -��'7 ,� request for variance at
mviG phew Orty- the following: r
1. That notice was given according to Code requirements, and Affidavits attesting to same
are in the file.
2. T at the foregoing set forth Standards and .Criteria each have/hove not been met.
3. I addition thereto,
hoi
^y
i
40 herefore, the request for variance is Denied/C d, subject -to the followi special {
ondi dolls
i
ecti on 12.1 G.110 and i f a building permit and/or occupancy FJrmi t is not obtained �.
or the subject property within one year from the Bite of the Board's decision, theNcon-
Oitional use permit or variance shall be automatically null. and void.---"
w
TED:
Date
Dat
Date
Dat
lee
7
cision shall be effective on:
DATA
Fp
7
of Application: �23/ °� Date of iieari nge 7 9 ------
of Publication: Continuances: of Posting: �-�--�
of Appeal from Decision of the Board:
rRoa�aer e4107
i GIY ¢ CKNTRR
I !eo AVK. N
1 �
•� ,. r, o j•f rJ rtllr,D •yj"'�•yii�•-�w✓.Z,y zyj A' 4'I •Q� A. ,,taN... �w],•1. i '�;7 u'.1:i 7�. ii��i• r��,r���
i SR �•! �'�' ' $ 9+.. =f ,�I•Y``'jSr,It
'n F7 1 ! ! J' K (M i� rntl rfi�i 'ri�pMi:w ` __ '; FI; W''�, �� }M.oRr� -
111tt B f Gq �fj i(`{'• /, 'l `i1 1,'.v1Y6`� 4004
•
,i f�Y���l� •') ��I�J�, -fr�j ; � ..r , \Y •iiRNT s,r J � I
too11 p000p
phop"; of pool;"r J�+ x
ti ,..,I potT•' : bW��e���Q+: } i 'iR'•,i..:.4 3' iiJ s+o::.�i+W 11J1`'iL►�Y�' •.i .
tt. MO
CITY OF ED _ ` ;'
�,
;,��;
Office of the City Engineer Snohomish County, Washington j
Leif R. Larson
' `4Yi . August 10, 1971 1
, ` 4
• A 1!J f L r, N ))`
Mrs.
Robert DeLong ;,:
lymp
18416 O
is View Drive "
Edmonds Washington 98020
1p.
'I
Dear to -
Mrs. DeLong: '
l If.
The en ineering requirements for the subdivision (Planning.
g roved b this
Commission File No. 5-22-69) have been
ebe completed isdthe provision of J
office. The only remaining item to P lan re ared
1
aturn-around at the end of the easemenThisacan be installed at the ;
by Reid, Middleton 6 Associates, Inc. ;
time building permits are issued on
Yours very truly,
CITY-yO� ED ONDS ,;
iR /.: • _
�I
.•. too
RICHARD H. ALLEN
Assistant City Engineer
RHA : rf�"
14
to
l
�orP , i
ti fto
�.
po
A•i.i.• pop
or
j !%''
�1 t'
s
t.
0
1oFat Div011
� s
IaA
/oo
-
1
Ili
4s.
400
e
k
2
v
Z.
• i
1.
1
G
i
II glow
It
r \
1�r • 1 , .`V .. �' _...ram^" r
i
IVO
r
�• �� i
into \ ti�
r D /� ,
� v zz \ '�/
,. �r v�_
zsi 3 z �o�+
,. a•=
fu
z G N = Aall
\
c coz,� $o
gamea Z Z mN000t'gool,. ? �'9�'
.O.
9,
1 z n Noggig /0 a.�. A
into
�cX
st 44 toW Z1. N 4 T�
`.i° w
s
o•a a. g
60
to
a$4p logo
60
at
„
00
ice. , ^''��•�,� 4 a ,
N a� �.r s
1p
- 1 ' 7•�• •.
m 4Iv 'll ��. / ��YY I•
1ggggs
kk
4 it CIO
goteta p0 'V; . by t }ry R
WWI
110
910
MIA
,� � Z � � z � � cif '•= • � �,.:. �
a T .961 9rr1 a . v0
uo N 7P�' IL, • _ ,�s�, I
if
cao �e O'r
rk
IV
Ali
to
it
go.
1
"' VONA
got
goo
view
9 /
it Noo,
Igogggg
AS
mm `
OD Zgot
r
y 'r '/r 4 , .1 ti r
E'%1.1* tD� �^ii'•.rb' � ':. ..• � • �'Igi l • •it, t, yttrLp l�
C
Ore`'�� 1
THE GRANTOR BRUCE BREDII01A.Pand GRETTG AN'N BREIWICI,, his wi.'� F - L.1 3 PAI 4
for, and in consideration of Assumption of e:;icting contract indebtedness only
conveys and quit claims to A/B CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a Washington corporation
the following described real estate, situated in the County of Snohomish
State of Washington, including any after acquired title:
AS PER ATTACiiAD LEGAL DESCRIPTION;
QSSCR I PT I M IN
PARCEL
a J14oss'
I%
Is
l�4 '
1140654
That portion of Lot 3, Block 2, Seahurst, according to the plat
thereof recorded in Volume 9 of flats, on page 90, records of
Snohomish County, IJashington, described as follows:
c• ,
1;
�y.
I'} °�y4,
¢ 'A.
Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; thence Worth
8b°12'4l1", �.est, along the South line of said Lot 3, a distance 4•
of 140.95 feet to the True Point of Beginning of the Tx ct of lSpV-I! iC
land herein described; thence North 17°22'22".,Bast, a di tahce � `.
of 82.67 feet to an intersection with the North line of said ,..
Lot 3; thence North 80 °51' 00" 1Jest , along the said` North line,
a distance of 173.24 feet to the Northwest corner of said Lot ,.$,• it
3; thence South 34°19'00" West, alonp the (Vest line of said `;T
Lot 3s a distance of 112.08 feet to the Southwest corner of •:
said Lot 3; thence..South 86°12040" East, along the South line
of said ld,�, 3; 'a distoxcQ .gf:,210•40a- feet to. the True Point of r ..�
,��
�c �.
'Be nn !,is ,,
gi inloop
PARCEL H At
i
A non-exclusive easement for ingress, egress and utilities.Io�.
over, under, across, .through and upon that portion of Lots let
recorded s and 4. Block 2,'Seahurst; according to the plat thereof ,
u
recorded in Volume 9 of Plats, on page 900 reords of Sno- �'";
described as follows
homishountY. Wnhington,, t .,�.s. tw`9irf.+ti' :�:' "; s','� �' :fr
d •.�;:. t y. .w.;•.! y,:,,Yed`ei,''..,�ti•.'�'., thence North
Beginning at the Southeast corner of said Lot 3; Of ,;,�
15°51'00" East, along the East line of said Lot 3, a distance
of 27.19 feet to the point of curve of a curve to the right having aa�;
radius of et to
feet; thence Northeasterly, along the are a.
of said curve to the right and consuming a central angle Of
of 1
1 feet to . Ma;. S.:
"Z1'2Z". ari arc'. ist tc;.rof••,•1q}, s� ,ng t
A low
of said hot 4; Mnce' NaYth 74 2 t10 West. along t e oIs
of said lot 4, a distance of 162.65 feet; theltce South 17°22' 22">
West, a distance'"of 171. 62 feet to an intersection with the South �h�'
line of said Lot 3; thence South 86*12140" East, along said South
line of said Lot
of 25a72 feet to an intersection with -a curve ;
having a radius of 20.00 feet; from which intersection the radius At
�
e bears South 72°37' 38" East; thence Northi h' ''•'
point of. -said curry
easterly, along the' arc of said curve, Abe �ng a curve to the r K N
and consurtinnr a .cetntral angle of 90 00 00 , an arc distance of 31.42 itsK
a distance of 20.00 feet to anf I
feet; thence North 17°22'22".East, from All
intersection with a curve having a radius ofbearaONorth�17g22'22"cFast;
All
intersection
20
intersection the radius point of said cure a'curva a;►. i
thence 1Jesterly,"along the arc of the latter,, aid curve, being f,
to the right arc£ eonsuminR.a central angle of:,90°00'00:l, an - of arc di$MIF
tance of 31,42 f®et ; thence North 17 °22 o22" EaithtahavinR a radius 17 � `t,
feet to -the point of curve of a curve t fi r.
of Woo feet; thence �ottheusterly, along the arc ofL.said curve ` ;tea ,
the right and con uming a central an file of 8.7'55v 38", a 'distance of ''�b:6� ,
feet; thence Smith 74*42'00" East, a distance. of $5.33 feet to the point
of curve of a ct}�rve to the right having a radius of 20.00 feet; thanes;;
Southeasterly..along the arc of said curve to the right and consuming j
a central angle .b•f 82°04' 11". a distance of 23.65 feet; thence Soutli' .,r„
7°22'll'i'West, a distance of 101.96 feet to an intersection with the 1
h li of said Lot 3• thence South 86°12"40" East, along said South
e
bout ne
lino a distance of 25.00 feet to the Point: of Beginning.
y
too
Is so
r
PARCEL C
An equal undivided 1/3rd interest in and to
propertyIP
Ad
the following described
All of tideland Lot ?Jo. Two in front of upland Lot No. Two in Section
13' Township 27, North. Range 3 Bast, I•l.AI. ,` all as conveyed by the State
of Washington bN Deed recorded :•larch 21, 1!106 under, ,luditorl•s 11;i1p
No. 10637.
All situate in •the County of Snohomish,.,St:ato, o,f. Washington..
*%4
ID
t�r7,9a7 -i # (v -A
46' C�
r5
M
y cw!.
��VVVI
aY
25,1Z � /3`•
11 :1 _-- -
V •
r
I
GOO
A � F
I� r r n
• � � N M M 11 1
K, A )Nor O //SOB iS �• ��
-+ r A C • � ' V
`Faw,C do,p z z Nli Al
two GO, Ln
�Q
z 4 I z
\za ztoo
z
r
onot 0 i�z �gm �r ?a9p/p�•
�n
j N O Gov B?�.kN fow
tot, Z M ib♦
a C� S f
°i two
a �
C � r
so
00000
C a
g i
`.
0 Otto
two
fit
IL
it
too to. to joe VC
00a ,'
too
i too too to,
two j
g` coo
r +r
cRot
Vol € �too
'�
O,.� �1 •�
AJ
101,96,
e� I
~ a7 41` `� yi�fO�
to 0
Arise
t to
o
motoot
a� `` W D
o �
a r•
N
A
O
I ` I
i
i
' S
i
A
s
NOTICE OF HEARING PETITION
FOR VARIANCE -x
BY EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
i"
All interested persons are hereby notified t t Wednesday, the
4
18th day of April 19 79 „ has been set as the
• y
date for hearing petition filed by A/B Co struction Coo
fr
for a variance - Lr€ri�?4XtI+�fi om required front
yard setback
I k'.
at 18418 Olympic View Drive i
r-
said property being zoned RS-12
a�c�t8g�xc�mocxl�€kazxf��t� • i ���
i
• i
i
i
Said hearing will be at 7:30 P.M. in the Council Chambers of the
Civic Center, Edmonds, Washington before the Board of Adjustment {
and all interested persons are invited to appear. t.
IRENE VARNEY MORAN
` City Clerks City of Edmonds
FILE N0: V-26-79
PUBLISH: 4- 2-79
W.
API
H....
♦ "i
It
Ipj
♦ I`.�� t
7W
,. e y
J` L,I ,.I,ii 4 k
1•
N G
0 BLIC ncAKI
`oil
'4 f 1, i .•A'R ., Yc ♦,t fl.: 9 t '.�,•a ;ir<tt
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT A „ ; xi?
I on
PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE ; _ 'A.
it
'Jil!
o
r Li• rJ, 1' ) 1r •'iK ♦t ri l.i�¢. iLL
too
to
N1,
eil
o
p r �•. ' o' i 1 y �. +'r
tIo
{21tk :C ,jyi ; j 1• 't•J �kI '�Y }..{
t •1 JiY '1 ! i. r C t , .. AAA. ,
rd • • • • F• > 1 YYYJJj
TT , ) t'.
} ftr'7.j 1•t It13 t j _ _ V • ,. Y • • • °• • • • •/.'• "•1
10
' 7Y1`
t�r, to t1,�F t.. .t,,• :ftt�jd7'ti;a,fr'7
VAIr AO&I rot "r lAN APPLICATION HAVING BEEN FILED FOR .r� Q ' LO ..1.
,slbk It a 0 0
to or 9
1 a t 0 At
a 0 a ot., a nf ard, a d a 0 0 9 0 9 9 a a' 0 6 0 a 0 4 a 0 low 0 0 10,11tsIol
Is or el
3rr�r �Y,
'� L (4.. ': Y'.0�^`1Y - , i�{• V riS { i f�D."�Ci93r k
! u
- • v f ,1;;
Alto 4". All
j Q J
DESCRIPTION OR ADDRESS. ..I•a�.4�.. . pe 1/4 91 to !'•�•',5
r f
,:
1 ,'1 .'.t Y13Ili to 11 1
f.T;4 ♦ •' I .•! 3v4 i I't i.a j1 t✓�`fy}..jf�..il'{i.
Its, ; is
ZONE CLASSIFICATION:. .. l • • • .
TIME & DATE OF HEARING . !.� . �... • , '� i
0 • � '.,.,
.. ... ... ... II
DATE 1
1.
k , ! rl'F 1 IME• DAY r�..
li
atlt. ,ttF it : 1 14
' J ♦.-t�,l 1 + a i .
Rtt { tt1 ,t[t1'"t 'it 1,.}' , ' ' 4 t \J -+•t It ,� s •'
t tlt r i,�f, 7 17�L`: }y t F,, ) i!' (»l , lIII:,i'igY.{' i
t' ' tfa 11� y�, i-$t , , y ,:.• , .1' f �it.' f °r••to
i, `?�h {1'{jrylk
1ri a Q`
1 )\. r i•1 ti. 4 1?• >3 �'f. 1 t ,'' _ ' I:' •!` 1N,1IF II t I
soi.14,
THE MEETING WILL BE HELD IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS. OF THE EDMONDS CIVIC
CENTER, 250 - 5th AVENUE NORTH, ANY PERSON INTERESTED IN THIS
PROPOSAL MAY APPEAR IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO IT, COMMENTS
CONCERNING THE APPLICATION MAY BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO OR. AT THE
MEETING,'of IN PERSON OR IN WRITING. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
OBTAINED AT THE PLANNING DIVISION (PHONE 775-2525 EXT• 227)• IN THE
EVENT THE AGENDA IS NOT COMPLETED ON THE ABOVE DATE, THE PUBLIC
HEARING WILL BE CONTINUED TO THE NEXT REGULAR MEETING AT THE SAME
TIIMEANDtPLACE• ,t 0. '°��>''ov ";j'
1, ? t l f i J AJ 1 Ay i
T { f : J; Jtf r ': 11 •. . Y IJ , '') of Q� P ,±I
f y'. ,,� 5M •{ }r ! a,r1�i4�•''rk.:�rA'fP
s ,. 1 ,. +,
A�/ ...9........ PUBLISHED,,. 9�
. . ••••••971 11
t ` ,' 1 ty},. .Zf
yt,.ef�7
rz y }� •,:
it t
w
TIJIC If o%rgrrn !e rV now ftwwa&d®rfar=L amoommm two `7/1 !''' ti 5'z''ir)
t{ t'1 fr 11
t The removal, mutilation, destruction, or 1
concealment of this notice prior to the date
of the hearing is a misdemeanor; punishable
A R N I N G® by fine and imprisonment. a r; ls
f. as ' t
• i A Ir7 I: .H
Jt
0
C.
Affidavit of Publication
STATE OF WASHINGTON,
COUNTY OF SHOHOMISH,
The undersigned, being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says
that she is Principal Clerk of the EVERETT HERALD, a daily news-
paper printed and published in the City of Everett, County of Snoho-
mish, and State of Washington; that said newspaper is a newspaper
of general circulation in said County and State; that said newspaper
has been approved as a legal newspaper by order of the Superior
Court of Snohomish County, and that the notice ....................................
Notice of HearingAr
:............................... ...................
.................... .. a printed copy of which is hereunto attached, was published in said
newspaper proper and not in supplement form, in the regular and
entire edition of said .paper on the following days and times, namely.
iIp
April 2, 1979
........... ......... .....................................................................
........
I
---•-•.................................................................. {
and that said newspaper was regularly distributed to its subscribers
during all of said period.
r �
............................... ........ ...:......... ......................
::.: _....:.............:
Principal Clerk
3rd
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
April 79
dayof................................................................... 19,........
....!/.......... ...... ........
.
otary Public in and for the State of Washington,
residing at Everett, Snohomish County.
5-2-1
w
N
FILE NO. V-26-79
APPLICANT A/B Construction Co.
01,
I
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
Notary Public in and for the
State of Washington I;
Residing at
�kk
4'
1979
:., a ..mow:... _. .. _.....
a NOTE`: APPLICANT OR REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT HEARING
i
AGENDA FOR EDMONDS BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT .x
COUNCIL CHA11BERS - 7:30 P.M.
i
a
APRIL 18, 1979
1
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. ROLL CALL
l•
3. WELCOME AND HEARING PROCEDURE TO APPLICANTS
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
5. CORRESPONDENCE
6. CONTINUED AGENDA
NCU-3-78 JOHN LARUE - Non conforming use permit to maintain
a non -conforming unit at 421 Sprague Street. (RMH)
7 AGENDA
V'19-79
CU-24-79
V-.22-79
V-23-79
CU-21I 79
I
V-24-.79
i V-25-79
V;-26-79
V-27-79
V-28-79
MARK'MCNAUGHTON.— Variance from required side yard
setback8etback at 21 3 96th Avenue '.•Jest . (RS-8)
NORSOL COMPANY - Conditional Use Permit for temporary
structure at 311 Admiral Way. (CW) - This is an
extension of. a Conditional Use Permit for the same
use granted March 17, 19760
LENARD ZAPARA - Variance from required side yard
setback at 9722 Cherry Street. (RS-12)
SCOBBY/OLSON - Variance from required sideyard setback
at 21721 80th Avenue West. (1101L)
212TH STREET PLAZA - Conditional Use Permit for
grading and filling at 212th Street S.W./west of.
72nd Avenue West.
LEWIS HIGLEY - Variance from required rear yard
set ac ,.from required lot width, and from width -length
ratio at 19910 76th Avenue West. (RD)
ANTHONY HOMES - Variance from required front yard
setback at 84 Spruce. (RS4)
A/B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - Variance from required
front yard setback at 18418 Olympic View Drive. (RS-12)
JOHN JONES - Variance from required lot width at
7511 La - Ballinger Way. (RSW-12)
R.A. CRAWFORD - Variance from required front yard
setback at 2r7ll 95th Avenue West. (RS-8)
PLANNER'S VARIANCE REVIEW FORM
FILE # V/ a(o-99
APPLICANT. /4 / 3 CG/vc,: trUclw cb/u
ADDRESS.0 ls,'qig olu, u,%Qw DrNje ZONING:
VARIANCE REQUESTED: ►q S� l�CIG
a sC.>ckf � � AJ c e.
ZONING CODE REQUIREMENT:_
OTHER PERTINENT FACTS:
VARIANCE CRITERIA - Section 12.16.100 ,
1. Does this amount to. a rezone? lip. rk4,3 44� ��p C,C` �•(,0,�0 ,
2.(a) Are there conditions and/or circumstances not general y, applicable to other
lands in the same district? 71J I
(b) Would strict enforcement of the zoning code deprive the pro ty owner of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district? O
3. Do the special conditions result from the actions of the applican`,?
4. Are there unnec'ess'ary hardships and practical difficulties in carrying out the
provisions of the zoning code? ,� a Q �1 i O�Q�CLtae
_ Aeor�
5. Will the granting of the variance be detrimental to the health safety, or welfare
of property owners in the vicinity? TKO
. a . A
6. Is this the minimum" variance that will make PMsible Ahe reasonable use of land?
7. Will the grant' ng of the variance general y be i n harmony an mpa i ble with thi s
zoning code? "�G ,; t O(D4"o CL,
5
Planner's Variance Review 12/77
FAA S FT
APPLICAflT I r
NCAR I NG : FILE
M
(01
d
P
L
CITY OF EDMONDS
CIVIC CENTER • EDMONDS, WASHINGTON 98020 • (206) 775.2525
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: May 8 1979
TO* A/B Construction Company
212 Skyline Drive
Edmonds, WA 98020
..
A
TRAIISMITTING: Board of Adjustment Meeting Minutes
RE: V-26-79
i
S
i
i
AS YOU REQUESTED:
FOR YOUR INFORMATION: XX
3 AS WE DISCUSSED:
FOR APPROVALS
FOR YOUR FILE:
I
REVIEW AND COMMENT:
COMMENT AND RETURN:
MINUTES OF MEETING: April 18, 1979
REMARKS,
i
1
M1
v:
%Y
^n
HARVE H. HARRISON
MAYOR
PLANNING DIVISION
f
f
�
Ilr
f
t
t
f
f
f
S
I
1
ti
I
MOTION:
r
Ms. Medina asked the applicant if there were other vacant lots
in the area. Mr. McGee stated that there were. He said that
the proposed subdivision was to put a street up off to the
side of these lots at the hammerhead turnaround. At that time,
Heasked if the street would serve the lots on the south side.
The sewer construction is placed on the south side. Mr. McGee said
that this variance will definitely impact his view house. Ms.
Stole asked Ms. Luster to clarify this inasmuch as it was her
understanding that there were only three lots involved. Ms.
Luster stated that it was her opinion that this only involved
three lots and that if there were, indeed, six lots, she had
been given misinformation. Chairwoman Alice Stole suggested
a postponement of a decision on this variance request. Mr.
Hugh Preston of 314 7th North stated that he owned the property
to the east. He said it was his understanding that when Mr.
Bennett made the agreement with the City that all of the roads
would serve the three lots which his mother was selling in the
area and that if Dr. McGee sold his property on the south side,
he would also have to deed an appropriate amount of property on
the south side to the City. As he understands it, it was
strictly for the three lots which his mother owned at that time.
Dr. McGee stated that he asked that question of the Planning De-
partment when the land was ploted and that was not the answer fie
got. Dr. McGee questioned whether tapes from the Planning Com-
mission meeting were still available as that was over a year ago.
He said that it was his understanding from that meeting that the
road would serve all six lots. He said that this house would still
come within six feet of the turnaround and is still over 50%. of
the required setback. Mr. Clyde Hagland, designer, stated that
if you design a house to fit the setback, the changes can some-
times be very drastic and the shape of the house would be most
difficult. This is a very odd lot and the grade problem itself
presents a design difficulty. The public portion of the hearing
was closed.
Mr. Paul Roy and Mr. Bill Leraas questioned the fact that this was
a minimum variance. Mr. Harold Hatzenbuhler said that he was
not sure that this variance couldn't be reduced from the amount
they are asking for. Ms`. Medina said that she could not visualize
what is happening in this area and felt she could not make an in-
telligent decision; therefore she would have to vote no. MR. PAUL
ROY MOVED, SECONDED BY MS. ALICE STOLE, TO DELAY THIS VARIANCE
REQUEST UNTIL THE MEETING OF MAY 16, 1979 SO THE BOARD CAN TAKE A
BETTER LOOK AT THIS SITUATION. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Wayne Tanaka,
City Attorney, cautioned the members of the Board to remember not
to talk to people for and/or against this during the time this is
being considered.
V-26-79 A/B CONSTRUCTION COMPANY - Variance from required front yard setback
at 18418 Olympic View Drive.
Ms. Nancy Luster stated that the zoning in this area is RS-12 which
requires a 25' front yard setback and the applicant is requesting
a variance on this setback. Ms. Luster presented slides of this
property showing the site plan and said that there are no buildable
lots directly in front of this piece of property. She said that
this variance would not amount to a rezone. This is view property
and it does not appear that there is a possibility of another struc-
ture obstructing the view of this property. She went on to say that
this is at the end of an access easement and a large portion of the
house will be located within the 25 foot setback. Ms. Luster stated
that the staff has some concern because of the construction of the
easement in that it could create some traffic and safety problems as
far as maneuvering in and out of the area is concerned. The staff
feels that a better design could be drawn up which would better suit
this site and a design should be more reasonable as far as the amount
of required setback is concerned. Ms. Luster said that the staff
recommends denial of this variance request because of the amount of
variance being requested, the location of the house to the easement,
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page moll- April 181 1979
I;
f
r
B
0
and because it does not appear that this is a minimum variance
as well as the fact that it appears there could be other op-
tions in designing this so it would be more in keeping with this
lot. The public portion of the hearing was opened.
Mr. Ron Johnson of 212 Skyline Boulevard, Edmonds, spoke stating
that this site is very difficult because of the easement and if
you were to push the house further to the west, the structure
would be much more difficult. He went on to say that the house
as it sits now is 46 feet deep and that puts it within 48 feet
of the embankment. The northeast corner of the house would be
approximately 15 - 16 feet from the easement road. Mr. Johnson
said that he has a recommendation from the engineers that the
house be located as far away as possible from the embankment.
Mr. Jerry Maury, owner of the property adjacent to the south
at the end of the easement road, asked whether they were planning
to build up to the asphalt road. Mr. Harold Hatzenbuhler stated
that the easement line is another 5 feet from the road. Mr. Jerry
Maury spoke again stating that he was concerned that this might cre-
ate a fire hazard if they build too close to the asphalt, will there
be a o�lo�gnn with fire trucks getting through. Ms. Valerie Olson
of 1��2 Olympic View Drive,stated that she had a letter from the
Engineering Department at the time this was all platted and there
was to be a much larger turnaround at the end of the road. The
letter stated that no building permits would be issued for Lot C
until that turnaround was enlarged. She went on to say that, at
the moment, water has flooded down that turnaround. Ms. Stole
asked to see a copy of the letter and Ms. Olson gave her a copy of
the letter from the Engineering Department which was signed by
Dick Allen on August 10, 1971. There was no further audience
participation and the public portion of .the hearing was closed.
Mr. Harold Hatzenbuhler stated that he didn't feel this was a rea-
sonable request. He said that he visited the site and the only
way he could turn around is to back up in the driveway. He did
not see how fire trucks could attempt to come down into that area.
Chairwoman Alice Stole said that she would like to see this plan
used, but she saw some problems which would have to be worked out,
particularly in the area of fire protection. MR. HAROLD HATZEN-
BUHLER.MOVED, SECONDED BY MR..JACK BYRD, TO DENY THIS VARIANCE
REQUEST TO THE FACT THAT TT 'IS NOT A MINIMUM VARIANCE AND.IT WOULD
BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE SURROUNDING AREA. MOTION CARRIED.
V-27-79 JOHN JONES - Variance from required lot width at 7511 Lake Ballinger
Way. RSW-12)
Ms. Nancy Luster stated that this is a variance from the required
lot width. The area is zoned RSW-12 and the code requires a 80 foot
lot width. Ms. Luster stated that this property involves separate
zoning. Lots 3 and 4 meet the minimum square footage requirements
for the RSW-12 Zone. This variance would not amount to a rezone
of this property and this request is in conjunction with the sub-
division of the property. Because of the unique configuration of
the overall piece of property, this would be the only reasonable
way to subdivide this lot into four pieces. Ms. Luster went on to
say that everything around this propertyis virtually built up, so
that, too, dictates the manner in which the property can be subdivided.
Ms. Luster_ stated that the exact variance request would be a 10 foot
reduction in the overall lot width on Lot 4 and on Lot 3 a 4 foot
request. The staff felt that this appears to be a reasonable variance
and they do not feel the applicant created this situation. The staff
recommended approval of this variance because it appears to be a mini-
mum variance for this location, because this area was previously platted
as 70 foot lot widths and it is not possible to get the now required
80 foot lot width. The public portion of the hearing was opened.
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
Page -12- April 18, 1979
hd "bSc ° 04 uU
.I
? 1ot OT
Va��9
G,Q
V!4ip
�y
\ �,Q�
n
J-4m IL
a L 11
to I
A-4.
rx w
ti Fi i
�;